Statics: Lesson 19 - 3D Statics About a Particle, Calculating Unit Vectors

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 40

  • @nukelyboy77
    @nukelyboy77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    for those who dont know, system solver in a ti 84 or any graphic calc is just making a matrix in this case you make a 3x4 matrix, and hit in the numbers for your i,j, and k after that go to home screen 2nd matrix rref(the matrix you made) and enter

  • @JetteroHeller83
    @JetteroHeller83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    8:54 I spent twenty minutes on this problem, thinking I made a mistake. Your method was correct you just plugged in the wrong value into your calculator.
    -0.5/2.06 and not -0.5/2.006
    The correct answers are:
    BA = 954 N
    CA = 858 N
    DA = 932 N

    • @zachrosedahl2813
      @zachrosedahl2813 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I also got confused there good thing others caught that as well.

    • @824justice
      @824justice ปีที่แล้ว +1

      here i am and got those exact values. good eye

    • @TheZectorian
      @TheZectorian 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Another reason to use variables until you want the answer

    • @gunter_2_1_k12
      @gunter_2_1_k12 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought I was going crazy lmaoo I just caught it and was checking to see if others did too

    • @kingbranden1369
      @kingbranden1369 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good catch.

  • @georgesadler7830
    @georgesadler7830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    DR. Hanson, thank you for a positive introduction to 3D Statics About a Particle. These are difficult problems in 3D.

  • @21RinOsc
    @21RinOsc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Hi professor, I’ve followed you since I took statics in 2015-16 but I am unsubscribing for a bit because you are taking up my feed with your re-uploads. I will re-subscribe after you have added your new intro but I will always thank you for being the best resource in engineering courses on TH-cam. Thank you so much Dr. Hanson

  • @maryseglah5293
    @maryseglah5293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You are the best lecturer ever. God bless you sir 🙏🙏

  • @ErikHicks
    @ErikHicks ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Around 2:37 it sounds like he's listening to the old video for the dimension :)

  • @StevenLinehan-x4e
    @StevenLinehan-x4e 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dr. Hanson, hour book has the x and y axes opposite the way you have it in your book on Page 65

  • @zackjj944
    @zackjj944 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The z dimension is 2 metres (he forgot to write it down, he notices at 2:55 ). If you pause in the begging and try to solve it you will need that information.

    • @ambrose_8
      @ambrose_8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      10min laytorr...

    • @nicolasguyader3635
      @nicolasguyader3635 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good thing it made me realize it was not going to work

  • @hebahalsoufi8908
    @hebahalsoufi8908 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you so much Dr. Hanson for your effort , you are such a great person ,thank you.

  • @annahanderson976
    @annahanderson976 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Its a sad day when you cant use your smart calc on the test. No system solver :(

  • @terrenceliesegang9223
    @terrenceliesegang9223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My calculations, based on your values, come up with Tab=963.140N, Tac=846.632N, Tad=937.400N Using excel matrix calculation. Retired EE auditing class for fun.

  • @lollol-dh9vq
    @lollol-dh9vq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so so much, God bless your soul.

  • @saosinohsix
    @saosinohsix ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Forgive me if I am wrong; however, if you are considering that the 2500N is in the positive Z direction, then shouldn't the coordinates of B be (-0.5, 1, 0)?

    • @josephh.1243
      @josephh.1243 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is correct I think. I had the same question.

    • @MasonP32
      @MasonP32 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@josephh.1243 also ran into this issue

    • @tomferbend3323
      @tomferbend3323 ปีที่แล้ว

      i think the Fz equation should have been -.873TAB-.9704TAC-.8964TAD=-2500N (neg 2500N).
      i'm thinking we're noticing same thing. am i wrong?

    • @kkkk_sskk
      @kkkk_sskk ปีที่แล้ว

      Is this for the lambda ac coordinates? (C?) i ran into the same problem too

    • @areebasidd21
      @areebasidd21 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pretty sure he divided everything by -1 so that all the signs would be positive@@tomferbend3323

  • @maniksharma5263
    @maniksharma5263 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just have a question; why cannot we take (x,y,z) in a regular way i.e the way we use in quadrant system which will make B(1,.5,0) , can you explain?

  • @jonathanlorens2312
    @jonathanlorens2312 ปีที่แล้ว

    BTW I used EXACT numbers for the unit vectors in calculation (irrational numbers like root(17)/17) and when I solved the system my answers were each, on average, about 1% higher than what you got. How do you go about using sig figs, how about in the real world??

  • @waichingwong11
    @waichingwong11 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very Nice Lecture

  • @jonathanlorens2312
    @jonathanlorens2312 ปีที่แล้ว

    God bless! What was the scripture at the end?

  • @paulsitchon5814
    @paulsitchon5814 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm confused in lambda method particularly on how to get the coordinates of points.

    • @wasjuswa
      @wasjuswa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You base it on the illustration of the problem

    • @agronmorina8797
      @agronmorina8797 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The way I think about it is that 2 cables are anchored in a flat surface (x and y) and the third one (z) is anchored somewhere up in a hill.

  • @kininnat3189
    @kininnat3189 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can anyone tell me I'm not clear about point B why he got B(0.5,-1,0)?

    • @sengulseydaylmaz2637
      @sengulseydaylmaz2637 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      İf you look the shape it is written (.5) it means 0.5. It is already given. You just need to check one by one the coordinates to write. ( Thanks to you, I realised .5, I tried to calculate like 5)

  • @andyjunior
    @andyjunior 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙂

  • @mr.papalavaskia9795
    @mr.papalavaskia9795 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    BEAT SOME OF YOUR WISDOM INTO JOHHNY WEEEEAAK SOUCE