Statics: Lesson 21 - Introduction to Moments rXF, Torque

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 73

  • @gregbowman1965
    @gregbowman1965 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Wow……took statics 40 years ago in the Fall of 1984. You make it fun to learn!
    All young students are blessed to have a great teacher like you! God bless you……..

  • @garrettschienschang4399
    @garrettschienschang4399 4 ปีที่แล้ว +180

    I love your content. Its great for helping me get through statics with all the online courses this semester. also
    p1: "What's torque?"
    me: "Just a moment."
    .....
    p1: "How many moments you need?"
    me: "Just a couple."

    • @theantil7
      @theantil7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Came here to say precisely this, you beat me to it lol

    • @maysondamian4231
      @maysondamian4231 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      i guess Im asking randomly but does any of you know a method to get back into an Instagram account??
      I was stupid lost the login password. I love any assistance you can give me

    • @mrchembe5051
      @mrchembe5051 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      made himself laugh , classic
      lol

  • @yaadav2102
    @yaadav2102 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Not all heroes wear capes. Jeff Hanson is one of them. Thank You G

  • @quinnpuffer7901
    @quinnpuffer7901 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jeff Hanson you seriously have made learning so much fun and I hope you understand that you have really made a difference in the lives of the people who learn from you. I appreciate your videos so much. I'm actually having fun learning statics now

  • @jaydean5243
    @jaydean5243 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jeff just found your series of Vids on Mech Engineering finally someone who KNOWS how to teach!,

  • @Willifordwav
    @Willifordwav 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I'm from the south, so I really appreciate your accent haha. I feel like my uncle is teaching me about statics.

  • @unusuallyy
    @unusuallyy 4 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    what a Brillant and simple explanation thank you sir wow!!!!

  • @نزارالمنجم
    @نزارالمنجم 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    hey just a moment this dude is actually making statics funny

  • @Jschlick100
    @Jschlick100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Got my first Statics midterm today, this video helped me a lot, thanks❤

  • @sergeantbarnes4109
    @sergeantbarnes4109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    That just a moment joke cracked me u!! I am ashamed of myself 😂😂😂

  • @JamalsJournal
    @JamalsJournal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    8 × -7 is 56, not 42. Nice lecture, by the way. You really make everything easy to grasp.

  • @SurprisePickle
    @SurprisePickle 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    I love you jeff but I'm not crazy right? -7*8= -56 right?? I dont see anyone saying anything in the comments so I feel a little crazy

    • @kay_em5910
      @kay_em5910 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      for a second i thought was going insane🤣🤣

  • @OK-ns1dm
    @OK-ns1dm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    hello, im on my final year mechanical engineering and i just understood the concept and how to calculate torque and moment using vectors. Thanks. Your videos are amazing !

  • @PlaysPlaystation
    @PlaysPlaystation 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I'm glad you are remaking this series! I am in my summer statics right now, except the hibbeler 5th edition seems to be one chapter ahead of what you are on or something because moments is chapter 3 now.

    • @giftd4002
      @giftd4002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I use the Global Edition and Rigid Body Equilibrium is Chapter 5. I used to be so clueless until I found this gem of a channel

  • @hyundeokseo5227
    @hyundeokseo5227 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir you are saving a lot of engineering guys out there

    • @Lily-of1gi
      @Lily-of1gi 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      And gals 😉

  • @Carbon-Aura
    @Carbon-Aura หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He really meant it when he said he'd call a positional vector "How to get to Grandma's house," for the rest of his videos

  • @georgesadler7830
    @georgesadler7830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Professor Hanson, thank for a classic analysis and introduction to Moments and Torque in mechanics one.

  • @adamgriffith6702
    @adamgriffith6702 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    "Dont wanna get ya all worked up there" LMAOO

  • @marcosaldana7628
    @marcosaldana7628 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Great video but 7x8=56 not 42

  • @Jauertussen1
    @Jauertussen1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi the way i usually do this at work is just taking all different forces and "rotate" them until they are 90deg to the plane then do the cos of angle to determine the length. then i can do the moment equilibrium equasion. of course in extreme cases this can be quite a mess but usually its just a few forces. so i can draw a 2 d diagram, with all the forces being eather + or - the length

  • @senorslap4613
    @senorslap4613 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you for saving me from Michael Seica

    • @senorslap4613
      @senorslap4613 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      OMG guys this is my first time getting TWO likes tysmm!!

  • @cc-gg6cd
    @cc-gg6cd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you struggle with cross products there is a solver on the TI36x Pro it's under the 'vector' menu's 'math' option, it's a bit of work to enter it all in but it's a great double check.

  • @sathyaprakash777
    @sathyaprakash777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    the super intuitive definition of position vector which makes taking moments easy.

  • @gavinliu9710
    @gavinliu9710 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    just review what I learned before during the lockdown, really helpful, fully appreciated

  • @sjaoenvf
    @sjaoenvf ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome explanation of r vectors in your example. thx.

  • @robertoandres2203
    @robertoandres2203 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I hope I can run into you someday and ask for an autograph, im your fan :)

  • @Spiceshit123
    @Spiceshit123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good lesson 😌👍
    From iraq ❤️🇮🇶

  • @anasalangar9762
    @anasalangar9762 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep up the great work

  • @kaan8550
    @kaan8550 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much, God bless

  • @petrosconstantinou2340
    @petrosconstantinou2340 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do I get Dora the explorer kind of vibes so I can learn? It works, Sir you are the reason I passed. Thank you so much!!

  • @takeguess
    @takeguess 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are the man! Thanks

  • @emrecoskun1564
    @emrecoskun1564 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    damn this guy is freakin good

  • @andyoteng1095
    @andyoteng1095 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    7 * 8 is not -42

  • @anthonylamotta4889
    @anthonylamotta4889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you thank you thank you

  • @pseudorealityisreal
    @pseudorealityisreal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! I understood the concepts.

  • @zachrosedahl2813
    @zachrosedahl2813 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was worked up

  • @kingbranden1369
    @kingbranden1369 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    12:04 Okay so I had to stop because I didn't understand this explanation at all.
    The best way I ended up finding to think about this is to just visualize a 3D plane with x, y, and z axis. If you take ANY two rays that only have x and y components and start at (0,0,0) then a ray with just z components like (0,0,1) will always form 90 degree angles with both rays. In fact the z axis itself is perpendicular to the x and y axis both.

  • @multipleorganfailure3449
    @multipleorganfailure3449 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant.

  • @davidbenter8137
    @davidbenter8137 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. Hanson I may see one problem. When you did r2 you said the distance is 24 on the x. If this is a right triangle shouldn't "x distance" be different then your Hypothesis???
    If the same then, then we have adj=24" opp=12(5)^(1/2)" and of course hypo = 24"

  • @aaronpuente5865
    @aaronpuente5865 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice

  • @angeloumagboo8848
    @angeloumagboo8848 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank youuuuu!!

  • @kevin5698
    @kevin5698 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I Stan for Jeff Hanson

  • @dysonbenko6388
    @dysonbenko6388 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you mentioned you had another video that explains how to use ti-36 pro to solve the equations, just wondering what video that is?

  • @ahmadismail1319
    @ahmadismail1319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    7x8=56, not 42. But i'm guilty of using a calculator 8=)

  • @waichingwong11
    @waichingwong11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very useful video.

  • @jonathanm9545
    @jonathanm9545 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good and bad moments

  • @nagimka986
    @nagimka986 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you not just do normal basic moment calculation for the last example?
    when do i use the 3D position vector equation and when should i use normral moment.

  • @hedy7548
    @hedy7548 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the intro had me dyiing LMAOO

  • @henryboot4218
    @henryboot4218 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I appreciate your corny ass jokes they help me focus

  • @abdulmoiz4773
    @abdulmoiz4773 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    sometimes sir give me the vibes of walter white if he does nt stop teaching.

  • @juanm_23
    @juanm_23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For r x F can you use rFsin(theta) where theta is the angle between r and F?

    • @jacobdavis5691
      @jacobdavis5691 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah should give the same result

  • @farhadjoya7882
    @farhadjoya7882 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do we multiple three vectors?

  • @redvenom9304
    @redvenom9304 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow 🤩

  • @jonathanm9545
    @jonathanm9545 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Coupling effect

  • @ibrahimalnahdi2381
    @ibrahimalnahdi2381 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:28 that was actually funny 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @Chloholio
    @Chloholio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm having trouble understanding where the r2 comes into play.

    • @toxicorb9793
      @toxicorb9793 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's just another position vector to choose from as long as its tail starts from the point you're trying to find the moment of to anywhere on the line of action of the force. In the example, both r1 and r2's tail began from point A and they both intersected with the force's line of action which is why they both yield the same result when you take the cross product of either r1 x F or r2 x F. As long as a position vector starts from tail on point to force line of action, it can be used (they both "get to Grandma's house" in Dr. Hanson's words)

    • @trexinvert
      @trexinvert 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Both r1 and r2 gives you the "same" answer, because the "cross product" calculation. The r1 is the most straightforward position vector, but say on an exam that distance 24" and 30 deg is "not given" whatchagonnado? However, if you take a closer look the distance r2 is given. Bingo. Use that.. For students who are just "trying to keep their heads above water" and barely passing this course, they will not have an understanding of "line of force". Then probably fail this problem. So, you must thoroughly understand what "line of action" means so that you can easily pick your moment arm(r, position vector) coordinates. Best way to get a "solid understanding" is to solve the same problem with different r position vectors. Keep on.

  • @elsayounes346
    @elsayounes346 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    King

  • @Ernestoks
    @Ernestoks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice joke about moment!:)

  • @luigianchondo7241
    @luigianchondo7241 ปีที่แล้ว

    All I did is sin(60)*24*100 to get -2078