Marshall 1987x vs Electro-Harmonix Mig 50 comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @thorinbane
    @thorinbane ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pretty close. For the 1/4 or less price I would certainly go with the Mig

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah the MIG is a real sleeper! One of the best amp deals out there@

  • @hirampriggott1689
    @hirampriggott1689 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems slightly more headroom and bite with the Marshall over the Mig 50, but a nominal enough difference in a live setting that no one can tell.

  • @onefelibata
    @onefelibata ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow, the mig sounds very good!

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, it's a really cool amp. Kind of like a cross between a Bassman and a Marshall.

    • @onefelibata
      @onefelibata ปีที่แล้ว

      @@billl.4410 I've settled with the bugera 1960 (non infinium for the plexo sound). Sounds idêntical tô the 1959 superlead.

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@onefelibata I've had one of those. Great sounding amp!! Good call.

  • @antilaw9911
    @antilaw9911 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video! I've owned 2 mig100 in the past. So I know their tone. I think 100 watts is too much headroom for that tone so the now new Electro made them 50 watts. For more controllable and easier breakup. I remember the sound was bold full bodied up front. I also know Marshall's very well because I own them. I like the snarl of a marshall but prefer the darker warms of the mig. These amps do have a true audio path signal. I played one using my tone bone hot British pedal. Totally melted my mind! Im buying it! That classic Aerosmith sound and tone I hear in my head now a reality at my fingertips. Old Aerosmith is the guitar sound I love.

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @antilaw9911 Thank you for your comment. I've owned a MIG100 too. It's a different design than the 50. The 100 is a master volume amp based on the 2203. The 50 is a non-master volume amp that is a Bassman/Plexi hybrid.
      Both are great amps!! MIGs are total sleepers IMHO.

  • @BellsCuriosityShop
    @BellsCuriosityShop ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching on the Kindle and the Marshall wins in this situation. Mig is virtually identical (mids sound different). Not sure you'd hear the difference in a mix or on-stage. I wanted a Mig from when Sovtek launched them, but I've got an old Carlsbro that has that sound.

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you for watching and for your comment. Carlsbros are absolute sleepers. They're hard to find here in the US, but they sound great!

  • @johnb4024
    @johnb4024 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder what the Mig would sound like with el34s? Or Kt66s?

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm planning to do that test eventually. I think EL34s would be cool with this amp

    • @goVLDaniel
      @goVLDaniel 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      U can use *KT-66* , that more clarity & tight than *6П3С-Е (6L6/5881)*
      But u need to simple correct *bias* .
      This amp have big transformer (New handmade by Leonid Musaev Sovtek Mig-50 _made in Russia_ model 001 .I don't know about electro-harmonix).
      Sometimes I use this head with external amp with *EL34* (R&R power 150 50W-EL34) & sound very good, juicy and power low end. That's better then 6П3С-Е.

  • @K3v0P3N80
    @K3v0P3N80 ปีที่แล้ว

    1987x all the way. I can tell the difference. Why I own the 1987x. Amazing tone out of it.

  • @ken3404
    @ken3404 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dig the playing..... Definitely prefer the Plexi over the EH.... Any mods? Bright cap? its hard to tell on my computer, it sounds like the channels are bridged.

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No mods and no channel bridging. I was using an attenuator here (SPL Reducer) which does affect the tone a bit.
      The Plexi takes the attenuator better than the EHX. Without the attenuator they're a bit closer but the Marshall still wins.

    • @KoolKatDave
      @KoolKatDave ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, but a good bargain at $700 over the pricier Plexi.

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KoolKatDave 100% correct. Amazing price/ tone ratio

    • @ken3404
      @ken3404 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@billl.4410 An attenuator is a must with a Plexi.... I tried a master volume mod on one of my 1987x's and I wasn't thrilled. It seemed to lose something with the mv, so I took it out and went back to the attenuator. I have the Weber mass lite which seems to get along with my Plexis...

    • @billl.4410
      @billl.4410  ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@Ken I agree. This amp has a master volume mod, which sounds pretty good, but for this clip I used the attenuator so both amps would have the same attenuation source.
      As for master volume mods, there are several different ways to do, I like the "Lar-Mar Type 2" that was designed by Ken Fisher.
      But ultimately, running the amp wide open and using the attenuator does yield better results, so yes I agree with you.

  • @bobdillon1138
    @bobdillon1138 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These types of amps need to be on for at least half an hour to get the tubes hot to hear them at their best.

  • @usernameihavechosen289
    @usernameihavechosen289 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    EL34 vs. 5881

  • @allekzio
    @allekzio 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The most interesting thing is that MIG can now be bought new for only $400
    The creator of the MIG amplifier now lives in Russia and continues to produce these amplifiers.

    • @mr.giggles4995
      @mr.giggles4995 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The original guy sells them for $400? Or are you referring to the Electro Harmonix reissue?

    • @allekzio
      @allekzio 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mr.giggles4995 Reissue. Now it called SOVTEK MIG-50

  • @pjmtry7
    @pjmtry7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rythm Marshall wins, lead.....not too much diff!