Ranking All Pathfinder 2e Classes (pre Player Core 2) - My Personal Favorites and Least Favorites

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @RebelThenKing
    @RebelThenKing  24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hey all, I've got a NEW ranking which includes all of the changes from Player Core 2! Check it out to see how the new rulebook affected the standings: th-cam.com/video/-9oRpLLNxSg/w-d-xo.html

  • @VoicesOfChaos
    @VoicesOfChaos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My favorite is actually Gunslinger! I just really love how they are designed around reloading, it makes each subclass feel so unique and makes planning out your actions really interesting. I could see the pattern you describe being boring but I found myself moving a lot to get a better position and had some other actions that provided interesting options.
    On the other hand my least favorite is Investigator so I pretty surprised that it is so popular. it just feels very boring and lackluster to me. Just like Gunslinger and Inventor might be off-flavor for some I feel like the Investigator just belongs in a less action-filled game.

    • @RebelThenKing
      @RebelThenKing  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It really is a good class, and I do like that you can pick up additional reloads as you progress to keep things interesting. I think that since I'm playing through Agents of Edgewatch and Outlaws of Alkenstar right now maybe I'm just a bit burned out on guns and gears and cities and would prefer to get back to swords and magic basics.

    • @RebelThenKing
      @RebelThenKing  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Interesting point about the investigator. I'm also kind of surprised at how popular it is. In fact I would dare say that's the class whose popularity most surprises me. It almost reminds me of how sometimes a band writes a whole album, has one song on it that they think is only ok, but it turns out to be their biggest hit.

    • @Dezbood
      @Dezbood หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Gunslinger is fun! I just wish running reload was built in, instead of being a class feat

  • @elizj
    @elizj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm loving the witch updates! It's no longer just a slightly different wizard, and I'm loving that my familiar is so helpful in combat.

    • @sethb3090
      @sethb3090 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Remaster witch is sweet

  • @BestgirlJordanfish
    @BestgirlJordanfish 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    For me top 5
    5) Magus
    4) Gunslinger
    3) Bard
    2) Swashbuckler
    1) Thaumaturge
    I think the big thing the gunslinger needs for spice is alternative reloads. Aid, Inventory, or running 10 feet to get into position could be real fun
    And then also alternative openers, like recalling knowledge, setting aid, or enhancing an ally's initiative
    God for me Fighter is nice, but yeah I agree I'd rather have subclasses, and I think there are elegant ways they can do that. Like...
    *Fighter Paradigms*
    • Weapon Master - Gains heightened Proficiency with a single weapon type including their Advanced Weapons and a bonus starting Feat with an Activity involving a Strike that you can use with this weapon.
    • Brute - Gains heightened proficiency with simple weapons, unarmed attacks, and improvised weapons
    • Arms Master - Gains heightened proficiency with all weapons, and once per turn can swap equipment drawing or exchanging one weapon for another as a free action

  • @grinningbuck
    @grinningbuck 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    2-for-1, today! 🎉

  • @shanemattox6827
    @shanemattox6827 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You really gave me hope for gunslinger through till the end...

    • @RebelThenKing
      @RebelThenKing  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haha. It is a perfectly fine class, and I actually would almost prefer playing in a party that went full steampunk in one campaign and used Gunslinger, Inventors, Alchemists, and an Investigator. That would be really, really fun. I suppose it's just maybe that after having played in Alkenstar and Agents of Edgewatch for the last 2 years now I'm itching to be a druid in the mountains.

  • @jeffersonromao4999
    @jeffersonromao4999 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My top 3 Martial:
    - Monk
    - Swashbuckler
    - Magus
    My top 3 Spellcaster:
    - Witch
    - Sorcerer
    - Psychic

    • @anthonywalden239
      @anthonywalden239 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What would you label Kineticist as martial or caster?

    • @jeffersonromao4999
      @jeffersonromao4999 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Caster! They can cast spells endlessly.

    • @RebelThenKing
      @RebelThenKing  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I just switched from playing a wizard to a kineticist in one of my campaigns (we soft TPK'd and decided to retire some characters, who are literally retiring due to old age). I opted to stay in a protection/support role and use Timber Sentinel. I feel like I'm doing more magic-based protection than I ever could as a traditional caster.

  • @jonathanbennison9220
    @jonathanbennison9220 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:07
    Off braandd for me perhaps, a bit,
    But I agree that a Debuff specialist (that competes on par with the buff specialist)
    An effective Debuff specialist, called a Witch or Hag?
    Beautiful

  • @bokajon
    @bokajon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Going hard till the end! I respect it!

  • @jonathanbennison9220
    @jonathanbennison9220 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:38
    I'd like to see beast shape forms that approximate Barbarian, Fighter, and Rogue archetypes.
    Stealthy Sneak Attacks Panther , Accurate Strikes Eagle, or Reckless Raging Badger/Boar etc.

  • @jonathanbennison9220
    @jonathanbennison9220 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:41
    Ranger : Changes :
    Pack Hunter?
    Could you elaborate?
    As is, the Ranger + Beast master, already can have 2 or more stronk kompanions, that can bring a large nukber of either,
    Bonus precision dmg, or, bonus accuracy with Flurry.
    Flurry can bring Agile, and really decrease the total amount of map inside a +5 Strike turn.
    Precision, across those 5 low MAP strikes, could also add up fairly significantly. Even without Flurry.

  • @tuffemily1431
    @tuffemily1431 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Will say Maestro bard has a feat to increase the bonus to +3 by level 8 so it can scale if u want it to take the multi muse feat in advance

  • @jonathanbennison9220
    @jonathanbennison9220 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Phoebe posted a short about the alchemist in PC2.
    I wonder how you feel.
    Excited?

  • @jonathanbennison9220
    @jonathanbennison9220 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    21.45
    Balance the alchemist against the Kineticist...
    Bombs as often as the gate powers...

  • @y813lnJack
    @y813lnJack 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The witch just looks so cool. I'm so happy with the changes

    • @RebelThenKing
      @RebelThenKing  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The witch is easily the "winner" of PC1, imo.

  • @Pathfinder2nde
    @Pathfinder2nde 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't get this video TODAY, considering that player core 2 had been distributed to some youtuber :o

  • @mattweber7283
    @mattweber7283 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Math time! Doesn't Kineticist arguably have 21 subclasses? 6 choose 1 = 6, plus 6 choose 2 = 15. I haven't seen much of the Kineticist in play, but I have to think that, say, a Water-Fire Kin would play and feel at least somewhat different than a Water-Wood Kin, for example.

    • @RebelThenKing
      @RebelThenKing  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is a good point. I suppose I sort of count the "combo" sub classes as singular though. For example, I don't count the Thaumaturge subclasses as more than the # of implements, even though you do pick up extras and have multiple combinations as you move along. To be fair thought, that is different than the kineticist since that kineticist can have "two subclasses" at level 1. Hm. I guess this is my thinking: # of subclasses = # of rulebook entries to read. 6 elements, 6 rulebook entries, 6 subclasses. 66...6 oooooooh no what have we done.
      Also Psychic and Wizard have dual-subclasses, but with both of those one of the subclass options feels more impactful than the other so it's almost like a 1.a, 1.b kind of situation in my mind.

    • @mattweber7283
      @mattweber7283 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RebelThenKing Thanks for your thoughtful reply! Really enjoy your channel.

  • @jamesphegan3087
    @jamesphegan3087 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can't tell what you're rating these on. Just your fondness for them?

    • @RebelThenKing
      @RebelThenKing  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mostly whether there are any glaring mechanic problems (only a few classes still have them pre PC2), and then a lot of personal opinion. When I tried a numeric grading system pre PC1 (1) trying to numerically measure criteria other than strict DPS or healing ability results in an opinion anyway, and (2) there were so many ties I just had to go to a personal opinion tiebreaker.