ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ธ.ค. 2010
- Charlie talks about how video and editing techniques and technology have improved over time. He reviews Primeval and The Sex Inspectors. Stewart Lee talks about how the perception of teenagers on TV has changed over the years. Grace Dent talks about love storylines in soap operas.
- บันเทิง
Stewart Lee and Charlie Brooker in one program!
My two favorite British comedians!
I was really moved by Stewart Lee's part
I wanna cuddle Charlie, so jealous!
Skins is possibly the least-realistic portrayal of teens, depicting them all as sex-crazed misogynists and drug addicts.
Just watching that comedien I don't know the name of. It was movingly true what he was saying. Its exctly how Skins makes me feel as a 16 year old.
I bought the Children of The Stones DVD solely off the back of this episode.
I actually like the BT adverts, I like Kris Marshall.
"The pussy loves that Madeley"
Utterly agree with Stewart Lee. I was on the cusp really; being a teen in the 90s, it was kind of half way between Children of The Stones tele (those progs that Russell T Davies started writing that were clearly inspired by it, and The Demon Headmaster) and at the same time Grange Hill being a teensy bit more sexual with teen pregnancies and the like, and on the horizon Hollyoaks. It was all rather awkward and you weren't entirely sure how you were supposed to be
Skins actually gets more serious towards the end, at least for the original cast in Seasons 1&2. I never bothered after that.
8:50 Oh Jesus he's completely right
DEH WONE in the Screenwipe HAUS!
@Urielthemagicalcrab I think you mean Stewart Lee. A great stand-up comedian
Obviously didn't see past the episodes with parties where they show their problems and troubles which have true emotion behind it.
Children Of The Stones seems to be about (older) children, hence the title. Skins is about young adults. I'm not saying it isn't a bit OTT for Michelle to greet Tony like that, but I can say from experience that a lot sixth-formers are like they're portrayed in Skins. Not all (or even most) obviously, but Skins isn't representing every 16-18 year old in Britain, as Stewart suggests.
What episode of Monty Python was that?
@whikless Don't flatter yourselves. At best people who do like Skins tend to be louder and more effusive about it.
did you miss the whole bit about editing?
@whikless Never watched an episode of Skins in my life.
i watched skins because of the lesbians in it and that
As an avid fan, no I didn't actually.
I'm not basing my disapproval towards Stuart Lee based on solely this one example.
Christ being a teenager was fucking awful
I think Lee's analysis would have been much better had he compared a current children's show with Children Of The Stones. From the shows I've drifted into on daytime tv, so many older kids are shown as smart mouthed, over confident and brattish. I admit I don't see enough to give a considered opinion, but I've not seen any portrayals of quiet, thoughtful kids on children's tv.
I wouldn't call Skins a masterpiece but I think Mr. Lee is fairly unfair there. I like him but I'm sick of him pushing the divisiveness of "If you're not an outsider like me you don't get art". I feel like I need to apologise to him for feeling included!