The Pak's plan was based on a war game played in the Pentagon, USA. The game plan had considered and ruled out the possibility of the Indian Army crossing the international border. The reason for this miscalculation was that the Indian PM would not dare to cross the IB. The Pak weaned on such myths as each one of them was equal to ten dal-rice-eating Indian jawans.
Americans believed that Pakistan armed with the most advanced American weapons would win the war against India armed with British & French weapons which were considered less advanced than US weapons.
@maryam aslam It is universally accepted that Pakstan lost the 1965 war - even pak analysts say that. There's enough evidence for that on TH-cam, just do some search. Pakstan's goal for the 1965 war was to occupy more Indian territory in the state of J&K. Pakfauj didn't achieve that goal, moreover the Indian army was knocking at Lahore's door. Listen, some free advice for you. It's better to remain silent and be considered a fool, than to open your mouth and confirm it to the others. Now, run along and go play with the kids, otherwise mummy China will come and do the same with you what it's doing with the Uighurs......
Sir what are your views on the application of laser weapos as antipersonal under the cover of antidrone weapons as Bharat will need to scorch the land to defend ourselves with Afghanistan overhang3
Nitin: Pakistan's Patton tanks in Asal Uttar were detroyed not only by Indian Centutian tanks but mosthy by the second world war vintage Sherman tanks.
Lal Bahadur Shastri 's little known repartee to President Gen . Ayub Khan of Pakistan.Gen Ayub was a hurly burly , Sandhurst trained Pathan. Ayub Khan used to feel very superior to Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji 's height.Lal Bahadur Shastri ( around Indo- Pak War of 1965 ) -"Gen Ayub Khan Kahate Hein Ki Yeh Hindustani Kya Ladengey. Yeh Log To Dhoti Pehentey Hain. "Mein Ayub Khan Ko Kehta Hoon - Phir Kya Agar Hum Dhoti Pehentey Hain. MERE JARNAIL TO PATLOON DALATEY HAIN. " -------------------- Another of him : Hamare pakistani bhai kehte thay ke nashta Amritsar mein aur dupahar ka khana Dilli mein hoga. Magar hum to abhi datun karne nikle thay, jo Lahore pahunch gaye" .
Was Col Hayde of complete Irish ancestry, or an Anglo-Indian? Because there were definitely a lot of Anglo Indian officers in the Armed Forces for the first few decades after independence.
Thank you for your acknowledgment, keep following our in-depth reports to know more about such topics. Check out Our recent video on how India is strengthening its air power - th-cam.com/video/DTJFlcfV_nc/w-d-xo.html
My understanding on "Why Lahore is centre of gravity for pakistan" :- 1. It is the major economic hub, because of still heavily agriculture reliant pakistani economy. 2. Majority of their armed forces officers and foot soldiers come from punjab. So, moral damage. 3. Punjab is population- heavy part of Pakistan, just like Balochistan is the land-heavy part. All comments, *additions* , criticisms are welcome.
I really appreciate the way you dwell deep in stats through stories. I have been following Simply Nitin for my SSB. Sir it would be great if you add some maps in the background explaining the naration. You are using it but it would be great if you add some more. JAI HIND
India's main attack was directed at Chawinda area where its only armored division was deployed. Lahore had secondary importance. Indian attack on Lahore was a poorly planned, weak, infantry led attack that immediately failed. On the first day, Pakistan blew up the bridges over the Ichogil canal and the battle was practically over. Indian attack did succeed at a strategic level as it diverted Pakistani forces away from Jammu
In fact, he miscalculated war reserves if he correctly understood the reserves of ammunition and had he continued the assault the Indian forces would have captured Lahore as well as pak occupied kashmir
Thank you Nitin for the insights, very nicely presented and articulated... Appreciate the whole Stratnews team for the excellent work they are doing, sometimes I wonder that you guys are like Lotus.... inspite of being NDTV you are still faithful towards India.... Perhaps you should have donated some blood to Pranoy, Barkha, Rajdeep, Nidhi, Srinivasan and many others who silent supported the Hate India agenda for 3+ decades. Naman to you all for this great service to our mother land. JAI HIND. Vande Mataram
Also to dispel this notion that had Pakistan have captured Akhnoor bridge then India would have lost Kashmir. It’s all wrong as then India wouldn’t have settled down there and then neither the war would have finished on 21st September. Even after losing that sector, India would have launched counter attack by mustering more forces there. It would have made Pakistan to consolidate its grip.
Did they capture Jawahar Tunnel as well!! There is a saying in Marathi,'Naak Dable ki tond Ughadte' ( Meaning,if you press/shut the nose,Your Mouth opens) When will our Kashmiri Brothers will understand!! Pakistanis love Lahore more than Kashmir itself!! Great Strategy, Still holds True!! Dhairya Dikhaya Indian Army Ne!!
Forget 🇮🇳 we have battled hardened PAF and our arm forces. You will get good taste now and onward. In the name of Abhinandanva, it was just a trailer, rest part2 after embarrassing ouster of Indians from Afghanistan. Remember quality matters not quantity.
Also, the Indian forces were in a state of flux and in the process of reorganization and the 1962 debacle led Ayub Khan to assume that India was a pushover. The outcome was surely not a stale-mate. India won the war.
Why didn't Pakistan try to wrest Kashmir from India in 1962 but tried to do so in 1965? ------------- My answer ----------- Very interesting question . In 1962 Pakistan was not politically / diplomatically prepared to militarily annex Kashmir . In fact Pakistan was even prepared to help India to jointly face the Chinese threat , Further , Pakistan was then an Alliance partner of USA .USA had directed Pakistan not to open another front against India . India , Pakistan , Chinese relations changed very dramatically after 1962 Pakistan under the guidance of Bhutto struck an anti deal with China whereby , inter alia , Pakistan gifted 5000 sq km plus of POK-i.e. Shaksgam Valley to China . By 1965 , Pakistan had China as an ally . Kennedy was gone in 1963 . Also , most important for Pakistan’s 1965 Indian attack decision Nehru had also died in 1964. Pakistan though that the new Indian Prime Minister , Lal Bahadur Shastri was a weak and indecisive leader and lacked stature especially when compared to Nehru. PM Lal Bahadur Shastri ‘s weak personality image was further bolstered by PM Shastri ‘s , sort of appeasement of Pakistan in the Rann of Kutch crisis in early 1965 Most important factor for Pakistan ‘s decision to attack India in Kashmir in1965 was that after her defeat in 1962 India had started expanding exponentially her armed forces both in numbers and equipment. Pakistan felt that if delayed further Pakistan , which was militarily superior to India till then , would never be able to wrest Kashmir from India. So ,Pakistan attacked Kashmir calculating that a weak Indian PM would keep the war limited to Kashmir. But PM Shastri with totally unexpected resolve , bravery and decisiveness .He counter attacked Pakistan across the International Border in Punjab forcing Pakistan to withdraw its forces from the Kashmir front and to , later , accept a ceasefire
Why are you forgetting to metion battle of chuvinda where your army left their tanks and run away. How flopped your attack on lahore and your army run away from there as well. Kashmir was total under us, we relieve it by the pressure of UNO
Chutiye ho kya he kashmir didn't completely came into ur control ur SSG commandos had entered kashmir and tried to destabilize kashmir by creating insurgency but our indian army killed all of those insurgents cum soldiers kashmir didn't came in ur control whereas we captured haji pir pass History padho ISPR ke propaganda nhi
Yes the brilliant Indian move was to deflect attention Which i suggested to Armenian defiance department In KARABAK war to attack the OIL PIPELINE of Azerbaijan, but they said no , because the British have send them a warning not to do so . And we all know what happened.
It doesnt matter , wars are done to put someone in place like China did in 1962 , the y gave away whole northeast and fyi aksai chin was in there control since 1959.
Do share your insights about certain non military dimensions like America's debacles in certain fronts in Iraq as like in public domains by Jullian Assange and his disciples (won't name though)
See the account of conquest of Lahore by Lt. Gen HS Panag. Gen. Panag became the commanding officer of the very battalion that conquered Lahore 12 years after the fact. It was a battalion of 4 Sikh regiment and how not one single soldier of the 4 Sikh regiment fought for 16 days of the 17 day war. They were all dead or Pows.
@@tandavaar1598 Indians have very short memory. You forgot Abhinandanva and Kashmiri Chai. In just 1st day of 1965 war PAF had crippled 40% of IAF air force. The dream of capturing Lahore was drained by Pakistanis though they were 1:5 ratio. That's why quality matters not quantity. Post Balakot is a solid proof.
Nitin bring both sides in your shows to discuss. Don't make your Godi media obsessed watches fool.This is all Indian one sided propaganda. PAF M.M.Alam had recird 11 Indian planes hunt in 1965.
Very interesting topic, like many others BUT, all such topics are of the PAST India has the capability to be a $30 TRILLION economy that has never reached even $3 trillion Nitin, please focus your remaining years on the future of India. How does Indian technologies in the armed forces compare to the latest and greatest. How can the Indian forces become a hard power. How to improve the economy to become a hard power. Power projection - serious projection, not a 20 min discussion based on questions from viewers Be serious Nitin
Absolutely. Indian Army is known for its cowardice. Its biggest cowardice was in 1971 war. Due to Indian Army's sheer cowardice Bangladesh was liberated.
You can always invent numbers but the Indians generals who fought the war call it a draw. There have been only two decisive battles between India and Pakistan, one in 1948 when Pakistan threw out Indian Army from 35000 Sq. mi. of Kashmir now called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit And Baltistan. India avenged this in 1971 by conquering 55000 Sq. mi. of what is now called Bangladesh. One correction, in 1971 India did not conquer half of Pakistan it only conquered one-sixth of Pakistan.
The Pak's plan was based on a war game played in the Pentagon, USA. The game plan had considered and ruled out the possibility of the Indian Army crossing the international border. The reason for this miscalculation was that the Indian PM would not dare to cross the IB. The Pak weaned on such myths as each one of them was equal to ten dal-rice-eating Indian jawans.
Pakistanis think that Indians being veggies can easily get beaten
Americans believed that Pakistan armed with the most advanced American weapons would win the war against India armed with British & French weapons which were considered less advanced than US weapons.
@@prakashwarty4020 America forgot that weapons alone doesn't win wars
It was the idea of General Jayant Chowdhury to attack Lahore. His father was the Raja of Taki, West Bengal. He also captured Hyderabad in 1948.
This was great. We really should make this standard information at schools in India.
Thanks
Absolutely 🎯
@maryam aslam hahahaha says someone who has been ruled by pakfauj since day 1.....you got the attention you wanted, now bore off.
@maryam aslam It is universally accepted that Pakstan lost the 1965 war - even pak analysts say that. There's enough evidence for that on TH-cam, just do some search. Pakstan's goal for the 1965 war was to occupy more Indian territory in the state of J&K. Pakfauj didn't achieve that goal, moreover the Indian army was knocking at Lahore's door. Listen, some free advice for you. It's better to remain silent and be considered a fool, than to open your mouth and confirm it to the others. Now, run along and go play with the kids, otherwise mummy China will come and do the same with you what it's doing with the Uighurs......
@maryam aslam abba dabba jabbba 🐐🐐🐐🐐
I am here to answer any queries
Very informative. I do read all your books, including the 1965 - Turning the tide.
Thanks Pradeep
But the Pakistanis, loosing war after war, till date has not learnt it's lesson.
Thanks Nitin
Sir what are your views on the application of laser weapos as antipersonal under the cover of antidrone weapons as Bharat will need to scorch the land to defend ourselves with Afghanistan overhang3
Nitin: Pakistan's Patton tanks in Asal Uttar were detroyed not only by Indian Centutian tanks but mosthy by the second world war vintage Sherman tanks.
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 fake news 👉🐖🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 don't spread fake videos here 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 bzdil_pki_bakras🐐🐐🐐🐐
@@kaaaah2003 hiramandi gadhera__babbudaar___®®®®
I love your narratives! Very professional & patriotic, many a times neutral too! No jingoism and it makes you credible.
🙏
I like your one thing the most i.e you recommend one book at last of video.
This is so incredible.
Lal Bahadur Shastri 's little known repartee to President Gen . Ayub Khan of Pakistan.Gen Ayub was a hurly burly , Sandhurst trained Pathan. Ayub Khan used to feel very superior to Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji 's height.Lal Bahadur Shastri ( around Indo- Pak War of 1965 ) -"Gen Ayub Khan Kahate Hein Ki Yeh Hindustani Kya Ladengey. Yeh Log To Dhoti Pehentey Hain.
"Mein Ayub Khan Ko Kehta Hoon - Phir Kya Agar Hum Dhoti Pehentey Hain. MERE JARNAIL TO PATLOON DALATEY HAIN. "
--------------------
Another
of him : Hamare pakistani bhai kehte thay ke nashta Amritsar mein aur
dupahar ka khana Dilli mein hoga. Magar hum to abhi datun karne nikle
thay, jo Lahore pahunch gaye" .
I appreciate,your indepth knowledge and the way of speaking. Thee cheers to you.
Was Col Hayde of complete Irish ancestry, or an Anglo-Indian? Because there were definitely a lot of Anglo Indian officers in the Armed Forces for the first few decades after independence.
Very well documented... Learning more and more about how India is defending it's borders well.... 🙏👑👏
Thank you for your acknowledgment, keep following our in-depth reports to know more about such topics. Check out Our recent video on how India is strengthening its air power - th-cam.com/video/DTJFlcfV_nc/w-d-xo.html
I don’t know where Kartarpur is but India could have captured and kept it as a reparation/ punishment for starting the 1965 war.
Day dreaming....Abhinandanva?
@@kaaaah2003 remember 1971 ? Day dreaming 🤪🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 impotent bzdil _bakra_pki©©©©©
@@kaaaah2003 sn of a bzdil gn
@@kaaaah2003 1971 was also a dream but it was materialized and Siachen was also a dream but was materialized in 1984.
Best of the best. Keep it up StratNews!
Thanks Nitin for giving inside information about 1965 War
Yahya didn't want to attribute the success to Akhtar Malik, maybe another reason was he was an ahmadiya
मेरे एकमात्र नायक हमारे भारतीय सेना के सशस्त्र कर्मी हैं जो राष्ट्र की अखंडता और सम्मान की रक्षा के लिए रक्त और जीवन का सर्वोच्च बलिदान देते हैं।
My understanding on "Why Lahore is centre of gravity for pakistan" :-
1. It is the major economic hub, because of still heavily agriculture reliant pakistani economy.
2. Majority of their armed forces officers and foot soldiers come from punjab. So, moral damage.
3. Punjab is population- heavy part of Pakistan, just like Balochistan is the land-heavy part.
All comments, *additions* , criticisms are welcome.
Bang on
Thanks Nitin sir.
A positive comment from you means a lot for me. 🙏
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐖🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 don't spam fake videos here 🤣😂🤣😅
As always ,simple and informative, thank you for another wonderful episode
All of Nithin's videos are to put mildly outstanding . A must see for anyone interested in history in general and military history in particular
I really appreciate the way you dwell deep in stats through stories. I have been following Simply Nitin for my SSB. Sir it would be great if you add some maps in the background explaining the naration. You are using it but it would be great if you add some more.
JAI HIND
Incredible India ... incredible Indians
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏🙏🙏🕉️🕉️🕉️
th-cam.com/video/0VBn2gLPD7w/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐖🐖😜🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪😂😂
@@kaaaah2003 bhaag Bakra bhaag®®®
@@kaaaah2003 don't spam fake videos here 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂
India's main attack was directed at Chawinda area where its only armored division was deployed. Lahore had secondary importance. Indian attack on Lahore was a poorly planned, weak, infantry led attack that immediately failed. On the first day, Pakistan blew up the bridges over the Ichogil canal and the battle was practically over. Indian attack did succeed at a strategic level as it diverted Pakistani forces away from Jammu
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐷😅😅😅😜🤪🤪🤪
Keep your propaganda in your pocket Katore 😜😜😜😜😜🤣😂🤣😅🤣
Spread your fake news somewhere else..we all know you lost in 1965 war 😂😂😅🤣🤣🤣
Faraz Katore Khalid 😅😅🤣🤣🤣🤣
J N Choudhury, the tiger of bengal....I think he is one of the finest army cheif after our god Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose.....❤
In fact, he miscalculated war reserves if he correctly understood the reserves of ammunition and had he continued the assault the Indian forces would have captured Lahore as well as pak occupied kashmir
Mr Nitin...
Excellent explanation 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Thanks a lot 🙏🙏
We salute to you sir.
Thank you for your acknowledgment.
Sir, your book , turning the tide is not available on kindle. Please take action .
Sir hats of for the services, happy to hear you, huge fans like any other in a million. Fantastic oration
English version of the book unavailable for past 2 years .Only Hindi available.Do something on this
Sure. Will request the publisher
Thank you Nitin for the insights, very nicely presented and articulated... Appreciate the whole Stratnews team for the excellent work they are doing, sometimes I wonder that you guys are like Lotus.... inspite of being NDTV you are still faithful towards India.... Perhaps you should have donated some blood to Pranoy, Barkha, Rajdeep, Nidhi, Srinivasan and many others who silent supported the Hate India agenda for 3+ decades. Naman to you all for this great service to our mother land.
JAI HIND.
Vande Mataram
Not silently supported, actively participated in hate India campaign. That's why their TRP is at the nadir.
This is one of da programs I always look forward. No matter how many numbers u receive on LIKE button pls don't stop dis programs
Thanks for this video
Thanks for the history.
Fascinating details. I would like to buy that book
Nice video 👍 Make more of such content..
Major general Akhtar Malik was a Ahmadi, that was why he was replaced with Yahya Khan
Ironically 6 years later another Ahmadiyya named Iftikhar Janjua captured Chhamb.
Excellent presentation
The Jats!! 🙏
Sir do share your insights about Americas wars in Iraq and libya..
good one
Also to dispel this notion that had Pakistan have captured Akhnoor bridge then India would have lost Kashmir. It’s all wrong as then India wouldn’t have settled down there and then neither the war would have finished on 21st September. Even after losing that sector, India would have launched counter attack by mustering more forces there. It would have made Pakistan to consolidate its grip.
Did they capture Jawahar Tunnel as well!! There is a saying in Marathi,'Naak Dable ki tond Ughadte' ( Meaning,if you press/shut the nose,Your Mouth opens)
When will our Kashmiri Brothers will understand!!
Pakistanis love Lahore more than Kashmir itself!!
Great Strategy, Still holds True!!
Dhairya Dikhaya Indian Army Ne!!
WORLD SHOULD OFFICIALLY RECOGNISED KASHMIR AS PART OF PAKISTAN 🇵🇰❤️
Excellent 😊 sir
Thanks
India did threaten Lahore but got a bloody nose and retreated back 😮to east side ichoo gill canal .
🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 will always lose to mighty powerful 🇮🇳🇮🇳 whether it attacks from front or back 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🇮🇳 🐅
🇵🇰🐐
@@tandavaar1598 🤣🤣🤪🤪💥💥
Forget 🇮🇳 we have battled hardened PAF and our arm forces. You will get good taste now and onward. In the name of Abhinandanva, it was just a trailer, rest part2 after embarrassing ouster of Indians from Afghanistan. Remember quality matters not quantity.
@@kaaaah2003 in Afghanistan bullet wasn't fired....🤔....must be the pki_bstrds....__
..has to be😂😂😂😂
@@kaaaah2003 bhaag chakkas bhaag
Mega Episode.
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐖🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 don't spam fake videos here 🤣🤣🤣😂
@@kaaaah2003 pki_bzdil_bstrds__@©©©
@@kaaaah2003 th-cam.com/video/gV3v5TESOLU/w-d-xo.html
Also, the Indian forces were in a state of flux and in the process of reorganization and the 1962 debacle led Ayub Khan to assume that India was a pushover. The outcome was surely not a stale-mate. India won the war.
True
Iam from laddakh Kashmir plz Kashmir ko jeeny do azadi do nahi rahna chahtay hum Bharat Kay sath
Chala ja phir kisna roka h
But still many Paks must be smiling that it was the JAT Reg that got there first.
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐷🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 don't spam fake videos here 🤣😂😂😂😂
Great ..please provide a discount on books for people following you
Will try
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐷🤪😅😅😂😂😂😂😅
@@kaaaah2003 don't spam fake videos here 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 th-cam.com/video/gV3v5TESOLU/w-d-xo.html
Why didn't Pakistan try to wrest Kashmir from India in 1962 but
tried to do so in 1965? ------------- My answer ----------- Very
interesting question . In 1962 Pakistan was not politically /
diplomatically prepared to militarily annex Kashmir . In fact Pakistan
was even prepared to help India to jointly face the Chinese threat ,
Further , Pakistan was then an Alliance partner of USA .USA had directed Pakistan not to open another front against India .
India , Pakistan , Chinese relations changed very dramatically after
1962 Pakistan under the guidance of Bhutto struck an anti deal with
China whereby , inter alia , Pakistan gifted 5000 sq km plus of POK-i.e.
Shaksgam Valley to China . By 1965 , Pakistan had China as an ally .
Kennedy was gone in 1963 . Also , most important for Pakistan’s 1965
Indian attack decision Nehru had also died in 1964. Pakistan though that
the new Indian Prime Minister , Lal Bahadur Shastri was a weak and
indecisive leader and lacked stature especially when compared to Nehru.
PM Lal Bahadur Shastri ‘s weak personality image was further bolstered
by PM Shastri ‘s , sort of appeasement of Pakistan in the Rann of Kutch
crisis in early 1965
Most important factor for Pakistan ‘s
decision to attack India in Kashmir in1965 was that after her defeat in
1962 India had started expanding exponentially her armed forces both in
numbers and equipment. Pakistan felt that if delayed further Pakistan ,
which was militarily superior to India till then , would never be able
to wrest Kashmir from India. So ,Pakistan attacked Kashmir calculating
that a weak Indian PM would keep the war limited to Kashmir. But PM
Shastri with totally unexpected resolve , bravery and decisiveness .He
counter attacked Pakistan across the International Border in Punjab
forcing Pakistan to withdraw its forces from the Kashmir front and to ,
later , accept a ceasefire
Why are you forgetting to metion battle of chuvinda where your army left their tanks and run away. How flopped your attack on lahore and your army run away from there as well. Kashmir was total under us, we relieve it by the pressure of UNO
This was already mentoned by Author, the plan was to threaten and not capture.Brainless. Thats why Pakistan is in such hopeless position today.
Chutiye ho kya he kashmir didn't completely came into ur control ur SSG commandos had entered kashmir and tried to destabilize kashmir by creating insurgency but our indian army killed all of those insurgents cum soldiers kashmir didn't came in ur control whereas we captured haji pir pass
History padho ISPR ke propaganda nhi
Also pl listen to Dr. Ishtiyak Ahmed on this topic
Pl inform us why Pakistanis halted their initial walk thru advantage.
Salute to then PM for bold decision to cross international boundary
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐷🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 this is incongruous to my query you are simply trying to eulogize pak forces who are habitual losers and are pampered for nothing
@@kaaaah2003 don't spam fake videos here 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 th-cam.com/video/gV3v5TESOLU/w-d-xo.html
👍👍
I didnt know this interesting
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐖🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 bhaag ktMlley__sley__@®®®®®
@@kaaaah2003 don't spam fake videos here 🤣😂😂😂🤣
@@kaaaah2003 hiramandi gadhera __pki_bstrds__@©©©©©
I would like to buy that book
Yes the brilliant Indian move was to deflect attention
Which i suggested to Armenian defiance department
In KARABAK war to attack the OIL PIPELINE of Azerbaijan, but they said no , because the British have send them a warning not to do so . And we all know what happened.
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐖🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 dont spam fake videos here 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 th-cam.com/video/gV3v5TESOLU/w-d-xo.html
😂😂😂🐐🐐🐐🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
but in pakistan text book they say pakistan won this war
Col hayde was Anglo Indian
I CALL IT IS POLITICAL WAR.EX NAVY. 67693.
Does not matter
As We gave them back
It doesnt matter , wars are done to put someone in place like China did in 1962 , the y gave away whole northeast and fyi aksai chin was in there control since 1959.
If you give back the territory that you won by spending blood, you have just lost the whole war
@@viksingh3875 India also has the situation of 2 hostile neighbours , so it always wants to calm one front and that has been the case .
Do share your insights about certain non military dimensions like America's debacles in certain fronts in Iraq as like in public domains by Jullian Assange and his disciples (won't name though)
Fence
Did pakistan get any support from china in 1965
What you are going to do? The Chinese have captured Indian territories in Ladakh, Chowkidar has any courage to snatch back?
@@kaaaah2003 don't spread fake news here, go save your 🇵🇰🇵🇰 there is blast in Quetta 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
Pakistan got only fake promise from its Abbu 🇨🇳🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kaaaah2003 sn of a bzdil_gn🐐🐐🐐🇵🇰🇵🇰
@@kaaaah2003 puncture putra🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐🇵🇰😂😂😂
Father son stories.😂
Abbu defeated stories 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤪🤪
@@Joy_IR89 😂👍
@@Pahadiblood09 🤣🤣
There's nothing to notice
U r repeating a matter again and again
Lies Lies Lies. Why you don't talk about Battle of Chawinda.????? What happened to your's famous armoured core???
Check the BBC report
@@debudey6365 which BBC report?? We are talking about chawinda know as mother of tank battles in which your offensives failed to penetrate lahore.
See the account of conquest of Lahore by Lt. Gen HS Panag. Gen. Panag became the commanding officer of the very battalion that conquered Lahore 12 years after the fact. It was a battalion of 4 Sikh regiment and how not one single soldier of the 4 Sikh regiment fought for 16 days of the 17 day war. They were all dead or Pows.
You cowards were bludgeoned and defeated four times in a row....next time we take no prisoners.
Keep your propaganda in your pocket Katore 🤪😋😋😋😋😋😂🤣😅
@@tandavaar1598 Indians have very short memory. You forgot Abhinandanva and Kashmiri Chai. In just 1st day of 1965 war PAF had crippled 40% of IAF air force. The dream of capturing Lahore was drained by Pakistanis though they were 1:5 ratio. That's why quality matters not quantity. Post Balakot is a solid proof.
Nitin bring both sides in your shows to discuss. Don't make your Godi media obsessed watches fool.This is all Indian one sided propaganda. PAF M.M.Alam had recird 11 Indian planes hunt in 1965.
@@kaaaah2003 LOL PAF is poor air force which didnt even have fuel to fly it's rotten old aircraft, let alone fight with India in 1965 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Very interesting topic, like many others
BUT, all such topics are of the PAST
India has the capability to be a $30 TRILLION economy that has never reached even $3 trillion
Nitin, please focus your remaining years on the future of India. How does Indian technologies in the armed forces compare to the latest and greatest. How can the Indian forces become a hard power. How to improve the economy to become a hard power. Power projection - serious projection, not a 20 min discussion based on questions from viewers
Be serious Nitin
There can't be no future without the past.
@@tandavaar1598
Good!
Then let India spend a lot of time on her past, enough to the extent there is no future
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html
@@kaaaah2003 👉🐖😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@nrao8977 for a future worthwhile .. past is the base....ain't it...
India attack ,on September 6,1965
on Lahore was in short “ Cowardly”.
Your generals are idiots who just assumed India can't cross international boundary
You cowards were bludgeoned and defeated four times in a row....next time we take no prisoners.
LOL first take those coward 93000 surrendered wet pants from East Pakistan, then comment here 🤪😂😂😂🤣👎🤣
Absolutely. Indian Army is known for its cowardice. Its biggest cowardice was in 1971 war. Due to Indian Army's sheer cowardice Bangladesh was liberated.
@@SumiOccult 😂😂😂😂
You can always invent numbers but the Indians generals who fought the war call it a draw. There have been only two decisive battles between India and Pakistan, one in 1948 when Pakistan threw out Indian Army from 35000 Sq. mi. of Kashmir now called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit And Baltistan. India avenged this in 1971 by conquering 55000 Sq. mi. of what is now called Bangladesh.
One correction, in 1971 India did not conquer half of Pakistan it only conquered one-sixth of Pakistan.
At that time Kashmir was not part of india ..
You cowards were bludgeoned and defeated four times in a row....next time we take no prisoners.
Keep your fake propaganda in your pocket. We defeated you black and blue 4 times and bombed your Abbu in Balakot 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ali Katora mosavi 😂😂🤪🤣🤣🤣🤣
th-cam.com/video/bNcFF9PMINY/w-d-xo.html