Well the audio is getting better but i think it was cliping a bit still. is that the Rode wireless go or go2 ? i guess you wend with custom dead cat if its the wireless go since that models deadcat did not stay on that good. what setup are you using when you record? you might want to lower the input gain just a tad. Been dreaming of a pinion beltdriven bike for a while :D it looks so nice. but i have to put in some more hours and years until i can buy a bike for over 2000€ first i need to do my recovery after a open heart surgery.
@@kamratdennis the audio has small problem indeed but that is not the mistake 😁. It is wireless go. I wish I had the go 2. Thr gain is the lowest , also I have very loud voice 😅. I hope your recovery goes fast 😊🙏
In Europe, internal gears are a thing. And also, there is a type of bicycle which has a fully closed chain protector box. These come close to a belt drive in longevity because you don't get any dirt on your chain at all. When you mentioned light weight, I had mixed emotions. The belt itself is much lighter than the chain, of course. But you need the gearbox, which is usually heavier than a derailleur set. What you did not mention in that section, is that you don't feel any chain slacking vibration under your foot. It's hard to imagine that you feel your chain feeding back into the pedal, but once you've ridden the much lighter belt drive, you know what I mean. And belts are so comfortably silent. In the ecologic aspect, I'd like to add that we use about the same mass of lubricant through a chain life as we use as plastic on the belt. Additionally, the chain has to be manufactured and lasts only one half of a belt life in perfect conditions. And, in top, the lubricant gets spewed into the environment, whilst most of the belt is put to the trash when it's at the end of its life. So that's a little better for the environment, too.
Hi Peyman! Thank you for your feedback of great experience! I started with the belt 9 years ago (it's the older, narrower version that can potentially go off the rails although that never happened in the end). It equips 1 of my 2 travel bikes. I drove approx. 20 thousand km knowing that the bike was an almost new opportunity. For me, saving oil and cleaning products, not to mention the grease stains on bags and clothes that require more detergents and disposable gloves when doing maintenance on a chain, all of this pollutes enormously. As soon as I made the change, I noticed that with a belt, you gain in efficiency because there is not all this metal friction and wear = energy! On the climbs, we realize that it is easier with a belt. Finally, the total absence of noise, especially freewheeling at night to approach wildlife, is something very precious:)
Well, there is a better Option: A chain glider with a Pinion or Rohloff. The Belt however has a bit more deformation work done to it. Once you protect the chain from the elements it is a very potected thing. And easy to work with. On our travelbikes we have that system and never had any issues with the chain. However a chain shifting system will wear out way faster than a fixed chain system.
@@radekkuszyk the product is called chainglider. It is basically a housing for a chain, that fits snuggly around a single speed chain. Thus you don't have to worry about debris in your chain.
I would love to try belt drive but price level for belts and sprokets are insane. Industrial and automotive belts are few times cheaper and I really cant see any justification for that big difference.
these belts genuinely are more expensive to produce compared to older style machinery belts But they are still pretty marked up and overpriced because Gates kinda has the market cornered
Hi, I'm riding a Tout Terrain Metropolitan with belt drive since 2011. And I had to change the belt after 25.000 km. For me it was the perfect decision. Wish you have a good ride.
Chains are $20 a pop and last reasonably long when regularly cleaned. I'll admit, if I cycled around the world the belt drive system would no doubt be superior, but I use my bike to commute to work and go on weekend joyrides. The cleaning is more work, but I only spent $300 on my bike second hand. I just don't think belt drive systems are a good value unless you fit a certain niche.
@@11marcian mine did costs around 1200$ but I use it since 10 years.... Yea no heavy driver. First chain. The belt is slowly looking through the tire 😂. But an E-Bike this class is 2 times heavier and easy over 2500$
Glad to see you have reached the same conclusion as Alee. I don't think I'm ever going to be doing such epic rides as you two but I've been using gearboxes for years and like them so my next bike will have a belt if I can find a suitable one. I prefer to buy 2nd hand bikes for both cost and green reasons, but finding a small touring bike with a belt drive s/h is tricky. Belts are still uncommon. It's great to catch up on where you have got to. Ive not seen any of your vids since you got stuck with the Pandemic. So I have 2 years-worth to watch now!
I have two bikes with belt drive now ( Priority Apolllo abd Trek District 4). I will never go back to chain. For me, its the convenience. No more cleaning greasy and dirty chains. And I save money going to the bike shops for tune ups.
Not really. Alee's videos are even more detailed: th-cam.com/video/PhXTl7gApVA/w-d-xo.html But it great to see 2 people I trust reaching much the same conclusion after serious real-world testing.
Thanks for your report! For Globetrotters or Dirt track drivers I also see the benefit of a durable belt and enclosed gearbox. I bought a bicycle with belt drive for my wife, who has got problems with her knees and thus cannot bring high pedal power. For such a specific usecase, the deflection force of the beltdrive is significant versus a well greased or oiled chain. Easy to switch to chain though.
For shorter trip, like a few weeks or couple of months, I can live with chain. If I decide to do a very long trip, a year or more on the road, definitely go for the belt drive.
I like my chain and XT gears on the touring bike with bar end shifters. Very basic but reliable. I like the idea of the pinion gear box but for gravel tracks and cycle lanes I could not justify the cost versus the benefit. I appreciate that it’s perfect for round the world touring. Great video! Thank you.
That is positively, the most extreme realistic tests, I think you could put the two systems under. Bravo, loved it! I've never seen so much stuff on a bike. *visions of additional new storage options on my bike, dancing in my head, lol. I've got a rear pannier rack and 50L saddlebags and room on top like you, but wow, you've got some serious storage on there.
I'd choose a belt, if i could afford it. Unfortunately even if the belt itself is not that extreme in price, a hub gearbox is just way out of my league at the moment.
You are right of you consider Rohloff or Pinion. But Shimano Nexus or Alfine are much more affordable. However, Nexus 8 or Alfine 8 have 307% of gearing range, which could not be enough for hilly terrain Alfine 11 has 409%, which is OK.
i am not sure if i want that on my mountainbike but let me tell you... you sir got an interesting life thats for sure... maybe one day i also do these kinds of travels switching from the adrenaline side of cycling to the adventure spectrum.
Very interesting. As an auto mechanic having serviced belt and chain drives that have done probably done a combined 100 million kilometers the chain is by far superior in longevity of operation if you can keep it clean and lubricated by a similar factor of 3-5x. With the design of bikes and how long it takes to refill a tank on a car vs person though I can see why it would not be practical to run a internal gearbox plus heavier drive be it shaft or or chain and to have the extra components like a timing case to keep everything clean and lubricated.... I dare say with modern materials and machining though we will soon see a chain an encased chain or shaft drive soon enough that will be essentially maintenence free for 100,000km or more.
Chains are better in enclosed systems that keep the chain lubricated well and clean. The disadvantage to an enclosed chain is increased size and weight, and in the case of a bicycle, very difficult or even impossible on some designs as many bikes route the chain around the frame so the frame either needs to be welded around the enclosed chaincase or the chaincase needs to be assembled from separate parts. This problem is also present with most belt drive systems, except for the Veer Split Belt system. Either way, the main problem with belt drives on bikes is the price, with the previously mentioned Veer kit starting at $350 and a replacement belt costing $100. While replacing the drivetrain components on a derailleur bike might add up to somewhere near the price and the chain at least needs to be replaced quite a bit more often that a belt, than maybe over enough time it's worth it. For a bike that already has an internally geared hub or a gearbox and has a chain drive, a belt drive system likely wouldn't be any cheaper as the chain lasts longer as it is always kept in a straight line and wider, stronger chains are used because there is no need to fit in many gears side by side like on a derailleur cassette. And if you're starting out with a derailleur bike and want to convert it to belt drive, you'll need to get a new rear wheel with an internally geared hub or replace the hub on the already existing wheel, either of which costing extra money.
The problem as briefly mentioned in the video is rigidity. A shaft drive system needs to be seriously well secured and that weight/complexity on a bicycle isn't desirable for efficiency losses.
Chain on bike wears quickly because it's exposed to external contaminants like water, salt, sand etc. Zero friction cycling has done extensive testing on this. How different chain lubes affect chain longetivity in different riding conditions. Waxing the chain can actually prolong its life about 3-5x of a normal wet lube
Nice, very informative. Picked up an e-bike with a belt drive and the main selling point I heard was "you wont get oil on your upholstery(car)or furniture in the home"(folding bike) ha ha, glad iv'e been doing some research, belt drives are so much more.... btw mine is a "gates" hearing that brand puts a smile on my face. Great vid, -Cheers
Pinion gearbox system seems to weigh 2.5 pounds more than XT triple 9 speed chain set which is just over a bag of sugar in the UK at 2.2lb. The difference between belt weight or chain is irrelevant when you look at the overall weight difference. Many thanks great video as always!
There's a huge difference in how many gears overall you can achieve with a 9sp triple vs an integrated gearbox for a belt. The chain easily surpasses the belt weight ratio in that regard. If you were to compare apples to apples then you would have used an xt 9sp 1x crank vs the belt drive. You also wouldn't need to just be limited to a single group set. The integrated gearbox has limited graduations so you can easily use multiple combinations of chain based hardware to match the gearbox. Cheaper, lighter etc etc.
@@alicenchainrings1326 Not really. All you'd ever need to do to the gearbox is change the oil every 6k miles which is super easy. It's vastly easier than changing the hydrologic brake fluid which is a standard on bikes at this price point.
Current belt drive systems are a sea change. Caveat is that belt drive systems have evolved Phenomenally over recent years. I think the flex and elasticity issues were mostly eliminated, if memory serves.
I am curious why you don't use a chain (belt) enclosure. That would fully enclose your belt so it's protected from mud, sand, branches, etc, making maintenance even less necessary! It would also protect your pants from getting caught between the belt and sprockets, and keep your pants/clothing cleaner. With a belt drive, you have a unique opportunity to use an enclosure because you have a straight belt line, unlike derailleurs where the chain moves sideways. A belt enclosure would make your touring bike even more robust. Thank you for your honest and unbiased video. Most reviews on TH-cam are commercial in nature and quite useless.
I have gone back to chain after breaking belts once a week I ride 250 miles a day and my chain has gone just over 18,000 miles as of now have not cleaned it or done any maintenance in the chain the belt I was cleaning it once a day to keep it going I think I will get 25,000 miles out of the chain on my bike
Well yeah the problem is even I'm not live in backwater country, to get rohloff or even pinion bike is amazingly difficult, not to mention the price and the import tax. 🤦
Seems like the lightweight belt is offset by the internal gearboxes, and ends up having just as much overall machining hours and tiny parts to break. Easier than derailleur maintenance, but belt and internal hub/Pinion gearbox parts are harder to get. Seems to be a total wash, to be honest. If you have the money to spend: yes, a new belt drive bike is awesome. If you don't: be happy with what you have. The Pinion box is several thousand dollars ... The belt-split frames are also thousands of dollars... We don't even have a wheelset, brakes, cockpit, bottom bracket, headset, cranks, pedals, or even the Gates Carbon Drive gearset. I mean - $12k isn't exactly a "super expensive" bike, compared to the BS full carbon bespoke road frames costing $30k+... But for ⅒ the price, you can build a truly amazing chain-drive bike, if you know what you're doing. I bought a bare frame to build a fatbike (Framed Minnesota 2.0), and ended up spending ½ of what it would have cost to buy the bike pre-built, then upgrade and customize. 14 months later, not a single trip to the bike shop
i also build a bike from a scrapyard frame. i actually just spend not more than 200€ for that. it is more friendly to the environment because of the recycling and also this bike last surprisingly long. i dont like it that everything must be specialized for belt drive like you say it is extremely expensive. also belts for industry machinery are extremely expensive too
@@anguismemes1666 Gates Carbon Drive belts are reasonable, and might cost equal or double the price of a chain... But to get a bike belt-drive happy is not a simple feat. I had a $350 full susp beater frame (KHS AM-2000) ready for belt conversion... Until I cracked the seat-stay tube 2" down, last year. 😭 At least it was a fun idea
Lemme one up you guys on the sustainability: built a commuting bike from literal trash that was lying around mine and a friend's workshops a couple weeks ago, it drives really similar to a fix-gear but has a rear hub brake (coaster brake?). Anyways it was built while I'm saving money to repair my MTB that was crashed into by a an electric scooter. Anyways English is not my first language so please excuse any mistakes and have fun riding your bikes
I would go with the hub gearbox and a chainglider. This leads to a similar protected drive system compared to the belt and it lasts about the same time as a belt. And you can get any chain replacement anywhere. Additionally you get less force onto your sprockets since the pinion will increase the torque on the front gear. Compared to a straight attach gear.
nice and clear video, about the gates belt. and you don't get paid for it. I hope they will see it so that you get recognition for your work. beautiful really beautiful😅
I tour and commute with Gates carbon belt drive bike and they are revelation compared to chain drive derailleur bikes which are primitive and real PITA to keep running sweetly and quietly. The moment a drop of rain or mud falls on them they start to make an awful racket or lose all their lube, rust or just jam up sound like a noisy sewing machine. Gates belts are truly low maintenance and very durable with a very long lifespan. The Gates carbon belt on my bike is 6 years old and has covered about 50k km and still looks and performs like new. Not a single problem with it. Totally silent. The sprockets are also fine as well. What's not to like? Derailleurs and chains of course!
Very cool in the city, chains are available everywhere, maintenance is master around the world, in the African continent I could put together two used chains before I would wait for a belt replacement.
For me the best with belt drive is that you dont have to try to get the dirt and grese from your hands every time you have done something with your bike. No more oiling and chain cleaning.
I have a belt drive. I do find it starts squeaking quickly. I need to clean and grease it 2 or 3 times a week, coz I find the noise irritating. Furthermore I've had issues with the eccentric bracket, where it got too lose and water and dirt got inside. So make sure it's tight and check regularly. Thirdly you really need to know all the ins and outs of the system, since most bicycle repair shops in the world don't. It was a steep learning curve for me and I had a lot of issues, which cost me a lot of time. In hindsight a chain would have been better for a gear noob like me, but the more I learn, the better it gets. Make sure you can at least completely take the bike apart and clean/replace all components before you leave!
Cant agree more, i work at a bikeshop and love recommending the belt drive, but not one single brand is capable of delivering belt drive in significant time. The waiting times are that bad that customers switch to chain for their purchase… really sad
Belt is definitely less maintenance. Chains will rust easily , especially near Salt water! And chains to get clogged with dirt. I always preferred belts on motorcycles. I have not tried a belt bicycle but I would definitely go for one if I was in the market for it. Belts are harder to install but they really last a long time and are very smooth. So I agree!!
I've been riding with a Shimano Nexus 8 and Gates belt for maybe 4 years now, just as a weekend bike and work commuter. One thing worth noting is that belt tension is pretty important, and that setting it either requires use of a proper tension measuring tool (which I don't have) or use of the slightly dodgey Gates app which uses your phone microphone to detect the frequency of the belt as you "pluck" it, in the same way as you'd tune a guitar. Bizarrely my bike only has a threaded tension adjuster on one side of the rear axle, which makes setting tension whilst keeping the wheel straight very hard. Surely most bikes have these adjusters on both sides, like you'd find on a motorbike?
About your complaint about the outdoor industry making things lighter but less durable: yes, I agree! I personally still really like a light bike though, so I make my bikes light by making sure there's nothing on it I don't need. My bikes are relatively light but very durable, because I just make them very minimalist. Personally I believe that's the best way to make a bike lighter.
Thanks here is a video of my comparison between Pinion and Rohloff, this video might be answering a part of yoir question 😊 th-cam.com/video/Rg8wh5qlHlk/w-d-xo.html
Belts aren't inefficient but internal gearboxes are. At least compared to a brand new chain system. Chain and belt lose efficiency when put under stress but a belt loses less efficiency but starts with a little less efficiency. The break even point is around 120W so below what most experienced riders put out. Internal gearboxes lose 6-8% compared to a brand new derailleur system in optimal position (straight Chainline) but the reduced maintenance is worth it IMHO. I use my bike for commuting and switched to a belt system because I hated the maintenance. And I will never turn back.
Nice, I only just found your channel. I live in Cape Town. I recommend riding through the Cederberg mountains, North of here (if that isn't already your plan). All the best. Feel free to contact me if you need some local info.
Also have pinion with belt. Efficiency drop is significant (10-20%), when I am on Pinion bike I cannot really keep up with riding buddies at all. However when I switch to the eagle I have no problem at all. Also mine usual home loop of 25k is 1:25 on pinion while on sram eagle I can make it in 1:10. I am no racer just casual rider but I would say this is clearly biggest drawback.
Interesting, thanks for input. I have totally different experience. I don't feel that difference when it comes to efficiency between Pinion C line and the Shimano Derailleur drivetrain. I feel much bigger gap when I am on a Rohloff bike. I have been touring with all these 3 drivetrain 😊. Which Pinion gearbox are you using?
@@NomadsTrails Pinion C1.12, I would say it is same efficiency if I am chilling and going just relaxed pace. The more I push to pedals the bigger drag is. I would say it is exponential. Probably thats why I feel it most when I am riding with buddies.
Hi, Peyman a little late in a reply but if you can manage it ???what chainring ___Sprocket combination do you use. Great video as usual very imformative
I wish I had a friend like you man lol, I bet you know how to survive and work on your bike with all kind of tips. What you do looks amazing to do but I couldn't survive alone with my knowledge lol
Definitely belt drivetrain is better as you concluded, I need to save to buy a belt drivetrain touring bike because I have big plans! Right now I’m touring with what I have, a 1993, 7 speed , Japanese Nishiki Meridian, chromoly steel and got a smaller chain ring and a bigger cassette to get 20.5 gear inches, I have crossed Central America and now doing the Colombian Andes, almost 4,000km. So getting that proper bike should not stop you from embarking in that adventure, I feel my bike is not ideal because of the geometry and want disc brakes and wider tires but I haven’t had any problem so far. Cheers Payman! Say hello to Matilda, hope she is doing better now, we miss her!
Hi, well said 🙌🏼, never let the equipments to stop you from your adventures, you don't always need the best of the best. it is important to go out and live it!
If we compare the low line chain drivetrain to a belt with many Kms with no maintanace in bad conditions - maybe belt is better. However, if we compare top of the line chain drivetrain which is properly maintained, ideally waxed, with a belt or shaft drives - they are inferior to chain currently.
Peyman, thanks for the review! I’m wondering how many teeth your front and rear sprocket are? As heavily loaded as you are, I’m wondering these details of your drivetrain. I know you’re a strong guy but I’m curious if you are geared more for climbing. Thanks!
You compare a little bit apple with cherry aren’t you? Chain with derailleur is heavy stressed. With pinion or Rohloff it is completely different. How long lasts a chain with these hub gears please?
My friend used the same belt (Cube Hyde race or something, fitness bike) and it broke in 18 moths. Needless to say this probably doesn't apply to all models, but we rode together for most of that 18 months, the chain happened to last some 5-6 month longer. Only had to replace it due to it expanding. For our experience, belt is not the way to go, but hey, tomato, tomato.
@Ulgima Corvus We can judge the belt performance based on one case IMO. Also how many km did u ride in 18 months? The cause of braking can be wrong way of handling the belt and braking the carbonfiber cords. In my experience and many other cyclists out there which I have spoken beafor publishing this video, belt lasts around 3 times more than chain. But if I buy a car and crash it I can't expect the car to work perfectly well the next day. 😊
The guy is sharing a story from experience and you're writing it off as a single incident? But your single experience should be the only truth? Instead it might be something you could learn from. Good luck on your gaslighting journey
@@whitelotus_zero I don't think we can learn much without understanding why the belt broke. It would be the same if the chain had broken instead of the belt. Was it an exceptional failure or due to normal wear and tear? As with anything a sample of one isn't very accurate. Sounds like Nomad Trails is pulling from much more experience. I would rethink posting little to no substance, escalating and making accusations.
I'm surprised you didn't mention the noise. I'm not sure how it is with bicycles. But for electric motorbikes, one of the main reasons they use belt drives, is because it's much quieter than a chain.
I have several old bicycles with chains. They are over 50 years old. Can you imagine belt after 50 years? It would turn into crispy paper. Also I like to ride my bike on high gear standing on the pedals full weight. That would kill belt within weeks of riding. Belts works well where tension is smooth and constant, for example in the car where they drive item that have constant resistance.
If you're doing a world tour yes, if not, it's a lot of expense. As, of course it means some sort of internal gear system and a frame that can be separated. So you are looking at £1500 to £2500 extra.
indeed it is super the great option for a world tour.As you mentioned indeed it costs but if you have the financial possibility to get this drive train for even a commuting bike. in a long run it will pay off, because of the durability and also you won't change, clean and oil your drive train.
@@NomadsTrails but your belt cost 10 times more than a 11 speed chain. also you mentioned changing the casete that is actually not necessary if you change your chain in the right time
awesome video. even if the belt in itself isnt more sustinable than a chain due to the fact that its made out of rubber and carbon, concidering a Rohloff or Kindernay gearhub is preadjusted and will outlast most people, and you need no bearadjust,enttools and so on, I think its the most ecofriendly option. And you get more time riding your bike as a bonus:)
Nowadays bikes come mostly with 1 X 12 drive trains. My experience is the chain and cluster doesn't last long, so IMHO pinion with belt has better as it is lower waste
Hello, one aspect among the ecological ones is that the Gates Carbon drive cannot be recycled. If properly disposed of, a chain can be melted down while the carbon drive is hazardous waste.Liebe Grüße
Hi, i see your point. Being more ecological is an interesting question. It needs scientific research imo. true the chain drive train is made out of metal and metal is recyclable. but for making the chain drivetrain energy being used and for recycling it also, add on top of that all the transportation and packing material. also i am not sure if there is no way to recycle the belt. so this is something which needs a research. but my guess is belt is more ecological. but it is just my opinion i can't back it up with any data :)
@@NomadsTrails absolutely, there are so many aspects in that topic. It is music of the future but If things like "Elektrostahlverfahren" or Elektrolichtbogenöfen are running on "Renuable Energy" things made of metal would show their advantge. I hope we will see an ecologic transformation in the prodoction of our environment friendly Bikes and everything. Liebe Grüße und gute Fahrt!🙋🏼♀️
Fluorine in many chain lubes is very toxic. (anything advertising teflon has fluorine in it) Neither are most solvents used to keep especially dry lubes liquid for applying them good for environment. I doubt there are many chain lubrifications which aren't harmfull for environment in one way or another. And cleaning chains from the worst gunks needs pretty strong solvents.
@@tuunaes Totally right. It is a shame that most cyclists use harmful products and "need" a very clean chain. One product I would like to mention is Atlantic "Bio Kettenöl". It is made mostly of renewables and does not contain toxic stuff. It's biodegradable and it works fine also under our shitty conditions here in northern Germany with loads of mud, rain and salt for half a year. We clean our chains with rags and they shine! These products are milestones, I am not here to make an advertisement... Milestones in my eyes and products that harm the environment sould be forbidden because there are alternatives. With that and a proper recycling a chain can become environment friendly.
@@kaffeemitcola6506 Actually biodegradable doesn't automatically mean lack of harmfull for environment in some way substances. It just requires them to break down. That allows still lots of not entirely harmless things. (and renewable could be used even for botulinum toxin) So without full list content it can't be known if it lacks harmfull in short term substances. And clean drivertain is requirement for achieving chain's high efficiency. Dirt in chain drive train will easily start degrading efficiency and also increase wear and tear: Dirt/sand contains lots of quartz, which harder than most metals. Couple km on wet unpaved road is enough to have grinding machine going eating chain drive train. So to be ecological any chain lubrification should also try to keep chain clean.
Internal gear hub with chain not belt is better. You even said you went from derailleur to internal with belt. Did you even tour with internal and chain? Good luck finding a belt in the middle of no where.
Even though that belt is plastic/rubber whatever it's still strong. Cars use that kind of belt, in local old sawmill there's 3 friction belts what makes sawblade turn and it gets it power from traktor and those belts are soon 20 years old :D Very bad looking, but still working :D
Do you ever get issues with cable stretch affecting the gear changing on Rohloff/pinion etc? (I went to gevenalle friction shifting because of those issues) my cycle buddy is upgrading to Rohloff with belt drive. But I'm the mechanic out of the 2 of us
i have a cube hybrid bicycle with bosch chain driven motor, for two years did no maintenance at all, my friend has specialized hybrid with belt, he is on his third motor in one year
Your friend most probably have a Brose middrive motor that are often used in Specialized ebikes. Within the motor itself is a belt that often tears up. It has nothing to do with the Gates carbon drivetrain, and there isn't any chain inside the Bosch motor itself as well. You will find Bosch motors or any other motor driving a chain on a bike, and find the same Bosch or other motor driving a belt on another bike. Inside a Bosch motor you will find only gears on the mechanical part of it, whereas in Brose motors you will find gears and a belt inside as well, which can be seen as the Achiles heel of the motor. On the flipside, the belt causes the Brose motors to be way less noisy as its competitors in the middrive section and having less friction, so that you feel less resistence when you ride the ebike without the motor support.
Hot waxing chains helps them stay clean. I think a full chainguards, like the Dutch use on their grandma bikes, would keep a chain from having to be cleaned. They need to make one that will work with derailleurs.
I'm not surprised. Coming from a motorcycle rider I would take belt drive over chain any day. And I would take shaft drive over belt on top of that. I'm not sure if there are shaft driven bicycles out there....
I want to comment on the topic efficiency: Whenever I mention belts to other cyclists I always get the comment: "But Efficiency". I think this is a very unfitting comment for two reasons: 1. The difference in efficiency isn't that great at all. You wouldn't feel it. This should only really matter to competitive cyclists, who care about every watt and every second. 2. The efficiency of a chain is only better when in perfect condition. In reality the efficiency of a chain drops much faster than that of a belt when in contact with moisture and dirt. This means that unless you're cleaning and relubricating your chain before every ride the belt is actually more efficient.
Good comment, I bike commute all year round and and by now I can clearly feel the difference between a well oiled, clean drivetrain and one that needs some love. It's a pretty arbitrary number but I'd say it feels like I need to work 10-20% harder.
I kinda hate my belt drive system. Because they're so silent and smooth by design, the second they make even the tiniest bit of noise it drives me insane vs the constant clinking of chains and sprockets. I also hate that they're a plain to tension properly compared to a chain, they make removing the rear wheel for flats a pain, and I can't fit a geared hub with my 350w hub motor. Overall I just don't see the appeal as a commuter. Eventually I will probably look into replacing it with a chain
I have made a very small mistake while recording this video, let me know if you did notice it!
Greeting from Uganda-Tanzania border crossing! 😊
Well the audio is getting better but i think it was cliping a bit still. is that the Rode wireless go or go2 ? i guess you wend with custom dead cat if its the wireless go since that models deadcat did not stay on that good. what setup are you using when you record? you might want to lower the input gain just a tad. Been dreaming of a pinion beltdriven bike for a while :D it looks so nice. but i have to put in some more hours and years until i can buy a bike for over 2000€ first i need to do my recovery after a open heart surgery.
Shimano Alfine or as you said it "Alpha Line" 😉
@@kamratdennis the audio has small problem indeed but that is not the mistake 😁. It is wireless go. I wish I had the go 2. Thr gain is the lowest , also I have very loud voice 😅. I hope your recovery goes fast 😊🙏
Spraying so much silicone spray and your disc looked exposed hahaha
You went from no. 10 to no. 10, where as you should have said no. 11.
In Europe, internal gears are a thing. And also, there is a type of bicycle which has a fully closed chain protector box. These come close to a belt drive in longevity because you don't get any dirt on your chain at all.
When you mentioned light weight, I had mixed emotions. The belt itself is much lighter than the chain, of course. But you need the gearbox, which is usually heavier than a derailleur set. What you did not mention in that section, is that you don't feel any chain slacking vibration under your foot. It's hard to imagine that you feel your chain feeding back into the pedal, but once you've ridden the much lighter belt drive, you know what I mean. And belts are so comfortably silent.
In the ecologic aspect, I'd like to add that we use about the same mass of lubricant through a chain life as we use as plastic on the belt. Additionally, the chain has to be manufactured and lasts only one half of a belt life in perfect conditions. And, in top, the lubricant gets spewed into the environment, whilst most of the belt is put to the trash when it's at the end of its life. So that's a little better for the environment, too.
Hi Peyman! Thank you for your feedback of great experience! I started with the belt 9 years ago (it's the older, narrower version that can potentially go off the rails although that never happened in the end). It equips 1 of my 2 travel bikes. I drove approx. 20 thousand km knowing that the bike was an almost new opportunity. For me, saving oil and cleaning products, not to mention the grease stains on bags and clothes that require more detergents and disposable gloves when doing maintenance on a chain, all of this pollutes enormously. As soon as I made the change, I noticed that with a belt, you gain in efficiency because there is not all this metal friction and wear = energy! On the climbs, we realize that it is easier with a belt. Finally, the total absence of noise, especially freewheeling at night to approach wildlife, is something very precious:)
Hi Didier, thanks for sharing your experience. Indeed the Belt is a fantastic innovation in bike industry. It is too good 😁
Well, there is a better Option:
A chain glider with a Pinion or Rohloff.
The Belt however has a bit more deformation work done to it.
Once you protect the chain from the elements it is a very potected thing. And easy to work with. On our travelbikes we have that system and never had any issues with the chain.
However a chain shifting system will wear out way faster than a fixed chain system.
@@theonly5001 Chain glider? What do you mean? 🤔
@@radekkuszyk the product is called chainglider. It is basically a housing for a chain, that fits snuggly around a single speed chain. Thus you don't have to worry about debris in your chain.
@Felix Leipnitz O yes, I know it 🙂. Although it covers whole chain, some dust penetrates it quite easly. It makes chain service less rare.
same Belt-Setup, same bike. Absolutely happy since 15'000 km. I completely agree with him.
🙌
Please send a link to but belt and caset
I would love to try belt drive but price level for belts and sprokets are insane. Industrial and automotive belts are few times cheaper and I really cant see any justification for that big difference.
these belts genuinely are more expensive to produce compared to older style machinery belts But they are still pretty marked up and overpriced because Gates kinda has the market cornered
It's called economies of scale. If every bicycle had belts they'd be cheaper, but for now it's very low volume and this high priced
and these rohloff speedhubs are insanely expensive too
Maybe in the future, this will get cloned and sold at a cheaper price by a certain country.
@@anguismemes1666 Shimano makes nice hubs for less. If you're doing trips like this you want the best.
Your choice of words in explaning and grasp of the English language is excellent. ! You are a real expert on such bikes. great job !
Hi, I'm riding a Tout Terrain Metropolitan with belt drive since 2011. And I had to change the belt after 25.000 km. For me it was the perfect decision. Wish you have a good ride.
Glad to hear you like it. Thanks 🙏
Chains are $20 a pop and last reasonably long when regularly cleaned. I'll admit, if I cycled around the world the belt drive system would no doubt be superior, but I use my bike to commute to work and go on weekend joyrides. The cleaning is more work, but I only spent $300 on my bike second hand. I just don't think belt drive systems are a good value unless you fit a certain niche.
Only 300$? Its like 1500PLN its huge amount of money.
@@11marcian mine did costs around 1200$ but I use it since 10 years.... Yea no heavy driver. First chain. The belt is slowly looking through the tire 😂. But an E-Bike this class is 2 times heavier and easy over 2500$
@@11marcian if that's alot of money, then you've got bigger problems...
@@murrijuana2842 mam idk where you are from, but here in Poland we are all poor. I and my family drive one bicycle. We call it pierogowe zawody.
@@11marcian I'm in America, lot of people have money but almost everyone is lonely and unhappy.
Glad to see you have reached the same conclusion as Alee. I don't think I'm ever going to be doing such epic rides as you two but I've been using gearboxes for years and like them so my next bike will have a belt if I can find a suitable one. I prefer to buy 2nd hand bikes for both cost and green reasons, but finding a small touring bike with a belt drive s/h is tricky. Belts are still uncommon.
It's great to catch up on where you have got to. Ive not seen any of your vids since you got stuck with the Pandemic. So I have 2 years-worth to watch now!
У меня старый велосипед Бриджстоун на ремне и планетарке,3 скорости,ему уже 40 лет и до сих пор родной ремень)
I have two bikes with belt drive now ( Priority Apolllo abd Trek District 4). I will never go back to chain. For me, its the convenience. No more cleaning greasy and dirty chains. And I save money going to the bike shops for tune ups.
Wow! Probably the most comprehensive review of the belt drive system. Keep doing what you’re doing. Thank you.
Not really. Alee's videos are even more detailed: th-cam.com/video/PhXTl7gApVA/w-d-xo.html
But it great to see 2 people I trust reaching much the same conclusion after serious real-world testing.
This guy has made a great contribution to all of mankind. Just saying
Thanks for your report!
For Globetrotters or Dirt track drivers I also see the benefit of a durable belt and enclosed gearbox.
I bought a bicycle with belt drive for my wife, who has got problems with her knees and thus cannot bring high pedal power.
For such a specific usecase, the deflection force of the beltdrive is significant versus a well greased or oiled chain.
Easy to switch to chain though.
For shorter trip, like a few weeks or couple of months, I can live with chain. If I decide to do a very long trip, a year or more on the road, definitely go for the belt drive.
For sure chain dose the job but the belt is incredibly convenient and long lasting 😊
I like my chain and XT gears on the touring bike with bar end shifters. Very basic but reliable. I like the idea of the pinion gear box but for gravel tracks and cycle lanes I could not justify the cost versus the benefit. I appreciate that it’s perfect for round the world touring. Great video! Thank you.
Top ! It's a very good thing to see someone who knows what he's talking about, from experience. Thank you and have a good trip !
Most welcome 😊
That is positively, the most extreme realistic tests, I think you could put the two systems under. Bravo, loved it! I've never seen so much stuff on a bike. *visions of additional new storage options on my bike, dancing in my head, lol. I've got a rear pannier rack and 50L saddlebags and room on top like you, but wow, you've got some serious storage on there.
Thanks 🙏, indeed recording and editing equipments are heavy 😅
@@NomadsTrails I bet and lithium batteries aren't exactly light either.
@@MrBilld75 and harddrives and cameras and so on... but I see it as good training and helping my legs to get stronger. So I don't complain about it 😁🙌
I'd choose a belt, if i could afford it. Unfortunately even if the belt itself is not that extreme in price, a hub gearbox is just way out of my league at the moment.
You are right of you consider Rohloff or Pinion. But Shimano Nexus or Alfine are much more affordable. However, Nexus 8 or Alfine 8 have 307% of gearing range, which could not be enough for hilly terrain Alfine 11 has 409%, which is OK.
i am not sure if i want that on my mountainbike but let me tell you... you sir got an interesting life thats for sure... maybe one day i also do these kinds of travels switching from the adrenaline side of cycling to the adventure spectrum.
🙏😊
Good to see you doing this stuff, great presentation and impartial analysis, thank you sir 🙏🏽
Very interesting. As an auto mechanic having serviced belt and chain drives that have done probably done a combined 100 million kilometers the chain is by far superior in longevity of operation if you can keep it clean and lubricated by a similar factor of 3-5x. With the design of bikes and how long it takes to refill a tank on a car vs person though I can see why it would not be practical to run a internal gearbox plus heavier drive be it shaft or or chain and to have the extra components like a timing case to keep everything clean and lubricated.... I dare say with modern materials and machining though we will soon see a chain an encased chain or shaft drive soon enough that will be essentially maintenence free for 100,000km or more.
Chains are better in enclosed systems that keep the chain lubricated well and clean. The disadvantage to an enclosed chain is increased size and weight, and in the case of a bicycle, very difficult or even impossible on some designs as many bikes route the chain around the frame so the frame either needs to be welded around the enclosed chaincase or the chaincase needs to be assembled from separate parts. This problem is also present with most belt drive systems, except for the Veer Split Belt system. Either way, the main problem with belt drives on bikes is the price, with the previously mentioned Veer kit starting at $350 and a replacement belt costing $100. While replacing the drivetrain components on a derailleur bike might add up to somewhere near the price and the chain at least needs to be replaced quite a bit more often that a belt, than maybe over enough time it's worth it. For a bike that already has an internally geared hub or a gearbox and has a chain drive, a belt drive system likely wouldn't be any cheaper as the chain lasts longer as it is always kept in a straight line and wider, stronger chains are used because there is no need to fit in many gears side by side like on a derailleur cassette. And if you're starting out with a derailleur bike and want to convert it to belt drive, you'll need to get a new rear wheel with an internally geared hub or replace the hub on the already existing wheel, either of which costing extra money.
The problem as briefly mentioned in the video is rigidity. A shaft drive system needs to be seriously well secured and that weight/complexity on a bicycle isn't desirable for efficiency losses.
Chain on bike wears quickly because it's exposed to external contaminants like water, salt, sand etc. Zero friction cycling has done extensive testing on this. How different chain lubes affect chain longetivity in different riding conditions. Waxing the chain can actually prolong its life about 3-5x of a normal wet lube
Nice, very informative. Picked up an e-bike with a belt drive and the main selling point I heard was "you wont get oil on your upholstery(car)or furniture in the home"(folding bike) ha ha, glad iv'e been doing some research, belt drives are so much more.... btw mine is a "gates" hearing that brand puts a smile on my face. Great vid, -Cheers
Thanks, indeed for me the durability is the main point 💪
Perfect guide for choosing a belt system. Красавчик!
Pinion gearbox system seems to weigh 2.5 pounds more than XT triple 9 speed chain set which is just over a bag of sugar in the UK at 2.2lb. The difference between belt weight or chain is irrelevant when you look at the overall weight difference. Many thanks great video as always!
🙏🏼
There's a huge difference in how many gears overall you can achieve with a 9sp triple vs an integrated gearbox for a belt.
The chain easily surpasses the belt weight ratio in that regard.
If you were to compare apples to apples then you would have used an xt 9sp 1x crank vs the belt drive. You also wouldn't need to just be limited to a single group set. The integrated gearbox has limited graduations so you can easily use multiple combinations of chain based hardware to match the gearbox. Cheaper, lighter etc etc.
That 600%+ range is a consideration too.
@@obliviondio also that gear box is probably a nightmare to work on for the home mechanic
@@alicenchainrings1326
Not really. All you'd ever need to do to the gearbox is change the oil every 6k miles which is super easy. It's vastly easier than changing the hydrologic brake fluid which is a standard on bikes at this price point.
I really missed you, i would have pushed you all the way to Tanzania. Enjoy the adventure brother. With love from Uganda. #mukigabiketraveler
Current belt drive systems are a sea change.
Caveat is that belt drive systems have evolved Phenomenally over recent years. I think the flex and elasticity issues were mostly eliminated, if memory serves.
I am curious why you don't use a chain (belt) enclosure. That would fully enclose your belt so it's protected from mud, sand, branches, etc, making maintenance even less necessary! It would also protect your pants from getting caught between the belt and sprockets, and keep your pants/clothing cleaner. With a belt drive, you have a unique opportunity to use an enclosure because you have a straight belt line, unlike derailleurs where the chain moves sideways. A belt enclosure would make your touring bike even more robust. Thank you for your honest and unbiased video. Most reviews on TH-cam are commercial in nature and quite useless.
Well on my 90-year-old bicycle with 2sets of chains that still looks great and works well
You are amazing, I admire that you are a couple that makes any stop, may God continue to bless you, hugs Edvaldo, Brazil. 05/24/2022
I have gone back to chain after breaking belts once a week I ride 250 miles a day and my chain has gone just over 18,000 miles as of now have not cleaned it or done any maintenance in the chain the belt I was cleaning it once a day to keep it going I think I will get 25,000 miles out of the chain on my bike
Well yeah the problem is even I'm not live in backwater country, to get rohloff or even pinion bike is amazingly difficult, not to mention the price and the import tax. 🤦
Seems like the lightweight belt is offset by the internal gearboxes, and ends up having just as much overall machining hours and tiny parts to break. Easier than derailleur maintenance, but belt and internal hub/Pinion gearbox parts are harder to get. Seems to be a total wash, to be honest.
If you have the money to spend: yes, a new belt drive bike is awesome.
If you don't: be happy with what you have.
The Pinion box is several thousand dollars ... The belt-split frames are also thousands of dollars... We don't even have a wheelset, brakes, cockpit, bottom bracket, headset, cranks, pedals, or even the Gates Carbon Drive gearset. I mean - $12k isn't exactly a "super expensive" bike, compared to the BS full carbon bespoke road frames costing $30k+... But for ⅒ the price, you can build a truly amazing chain-drive bike, if you know what you're doing.
I bought a bare frame to build a fatbike (Framed Minnesota 2.0), and ended up spending ½ of what it would have cost to buy the bike pre-built, then upgrade and customize. 14 months later, not a single trip to the bike shop
i also build a bike from a scrapyard frame. i actually just spend not more than 200€ for that. it is more friendly to the environment because of the recycling and also this bike last surprisingly long. i dont like it that everything must be specialized for belt drive like you say it is extremely expensive. also belts for industry machinery are extremely expensive too
@@anguismemes1666 Gates Carbon Drive belts are reasonable, and might cost equal or double the price of a chain... But to get a bike belt-drive happy is not a simple feat. I had a $350 full susp beater frame (KHS AM-2000) ready for belt conversion... Until I cracked the seat-stay tube 2" down, last year. 😭 At least it was a fun idea
@@Karl_Kampfwagen what chains do you buy?
Lemme one up you guys on the sustainability: built a commuting bike from literal trash that was lying around mine and a friend's workshops a couple weeks ago, it drives really similar to a fix-gear but has a rear hub brake (coaster brake?). Anyways it was built while I'm saving money to repair my MTB that was crashed into by a an electric scooter. Anyways English is not my first language so please excuse any mistakes and have fun riding your bikes
I would go with the hub gearbox and a chainglider. This leads to a similar protected drive system compared to the belt and it lasts about the same time as a belt. And you can get any chain replacement anywhere.
Additionally you get less force onto your sprockets since the pinion will increase the torque on the front gear. Compared to a straight attach gear.
nice and clear video, about the gates belt. and you don't get paid for it. I hope they will see it so that you get recognition for your work. beautiful really beautiful😅
I often wondered why more motorcycles don't use belts. They seem like they could/should be better.
belts can withstand only human torque, not motor's
I tour and commute with Gates carbon belt drive bike and they are revelation compared to chain drive derailleur bikes which are primitive and real PITA to keep running sweetly and quietly. The moment a drop of rain or mud falls on them they start to make an awful racket or lose all their lube, rust or just jam up sound like a noisy sewing machine. Gates belts are truly low maintenance and very durable with a very long lifespan. The Gates carbon belt on my bike is 6 years old and has covered about 50k km and still looks and performs like new. Not a single problem with it. Totally silent. The sprockets are also fine as well. What's not to like? Derailleurs and chains of course!
Indeed Alex, the Blet drivetrain is a big improvement 🙌🏼
I totally agree. My new Priority 600X with Pinion gearbox with Gates belt drive is awesome. All of my other chain drive bikes are jealous.
I got my priority 600x about a month ago, absolutely love it! Quiet and clean.
EXCELLENT!
Thank you for the real WORLD test!
Very cool in the city, chains are available everywhere, maintenance is master around the world, in the African continent I could put together two used chains before I would wait for a belt replacement.
For me the best with belt drive is that you dont have to try to get the dirt and grese from your hands every time you have done something with your bike. No more oiling and chain cleaning.
Has anyone the situation when nexus 8 caused damage to dropouts (literally pressed into them)? How did you solve such a problem?
I have a belt drive. I do find it starts squeaking quickly. I need to clean and grease it 2 or 3 times a week, coz I find the noise irritating. Furthermore I've had issues with the eccentric bracket, where it got too lose and water and dirt got inside. So make sure it's tight and check regularly. Thirdly you really need to know all the ins and outs of the system, since most bicycle repair shops in the world don't. It was a steep learning curve for me and I had a lot of issues, which cost me a lot of time. In hindsight a chain would have been better for a gear noob like me, but the more I learn, the better it gets. Make sure you can at least completely take the bike apart and clean/replace all components before you leave!
Belts don't need lubrication. The Gates manual explicitly tells you not to oil the belt.
Bicycles with belts in Uganda are very hard to find even spare parts but I would really want to own one. Much love
Excellent opinions. Keep enjoying your adventures, my friend.
Cant agree more, i work at a bikeshop and love recommending the belt drive, but not one single brand is capable of delivering belt drive in significant time. The waiting times are that bad that customers switch to chain for their purchase… really sad
Belt is definitely less maintenance. Chains will rust easily , especially near Salt water! And chains to get clogged with dirt. I always preferred belts on motorcycles. I have not tried a belt bicycle but I would definitely go for one if I was in the market for it. Belts are harder to install but they really last a long time and are very smooth. So I agree!!
I love to bicycle. See a lot more than in a car specially when the traffic isn’t bad. Not going to attempt cycling around the world though. Thanks
I've been riding with a Shimano Nexus 8 and Gates belt for maybe 4 years now, just as a weekend bike and work commuter. One thing worth noting is that belt tension is pretty important, and that setting it either requires use of a proper tension measuring tool (which I don't have) or use of the slightly dodgey Gates app which uses your phone microphone to detect the frequency of the belt as you "pluck" it, in the same way as you'd tune a guitar. Bizarrely my bike only has a threaded tension adjuster on one side of the rear axle, which makes setting tension whilst keeping the wheel straight very hard. Surely most bikes have these adjusters on both sides, like you'd find on a motorbike?
Yes, I haven't seen a one-sided adjustment on any bike. It sounds a bit "cost effective"...
Maybe your bike has an eccentric bottom bracket to adjust the tension?
About your complaint about the outdoor industry making things lighter but less durable: yes, I agree!
I personally still really like a light bike though, so I make my bikes light by making sure there's nothing on it I don't need. My bikes are relatively light but very durable, because I just make them very minimalist. Personally I believe that's the best way to make a bike lighter.
Nice to see your exploits again. You might address the durability and any maintenance of internal gearboxes sometime. Hope ya'll are both well..
Thanks here is a video of my comparison between Pinion and Rohloff, this video might be answering a part of yoir question 😊
th-cam.com/video/Rg8wh5qlHlk/w-d-xo.html
Sensacional!!! Esse é o melhor sistema transmissão.
Belt is basically a single-speed chain, and single speed chain you can put into enclosure and never service it.
I like the belt drive but in our place its hard to find belt in the bike shop
Just bought en ebike with belt drive. Sooo nice. Can recommend.
Thanks Peyman, great video, very informative!
Great review of the belt drive train. An eye opener indeed. A bit pricey for a layman like me but doable.
🙏🏼
Hi - great video !! I have a Bulls ebike with a belt drive and I love it.
Keep up the good work 👍
🙏🏼
The most informative, concise video I've seen. Awsome
Belts aren't inefficient but internal gearboxes are. At least compared to a brand new chain system.
Chain and belt lose efficiency when put under stress but a belt loses less efficiency but starts with a little less efficiency. The break even point is around 120W so below what most experienced riders put out.
Internal gearboxes lose 6-8% compared to a brand new derailleur system in optimal position (straight Chainline) but the reduced maintenance is worth it IMHO.
I use my bike for commuting and switched to a belt system because I hated the maintenance. And I will never turn back.
Do you have a source for the 120W breaking point?
Nice, I only just found your channel.
I live in Cape Town. I recommend riding through the Cederberg mountains, North of here (if that isn't already your plan).
All the best.
Feel free to contact me if you need some local info.
Also have pinion with belt. Efficiency drop is significant (10-20%), when I am on Pinion bike I cannot really keep up with riding buddies at all. However when I switch to the eagle I have no problem at all. Also mine usual home loop of 25k is 1:25 on pinion while on sram eagle I can make it in 1:10. I am no racer just casual rider but I would say this is clearly biggest drawback.
Interesting, thanks for input. I have totally different experience. I don't feel that difference when it comes to efficiency between Pinion C line and the Shimano Derailleur drivetrain. I feel much bigger gap when I am on a Rohloff bike. I have been touring with all these 3 drivetrain 😊. Which Pinion gearbox are you using?
@@NomadsTrails Pinion C1.12, I would say it is same efficiency if I am chilling and going just relaxed pace. The more I push to pedals the bigger drag is. I would say it is exponential. Probably thats why I feel it most when I am riding with buddies.
Hi, Peyman a little late in a reply but if you can manage it ???what chainring ___Sprocket combination do you use. Great video as usual very imformative
Ich danke dir für ein ausführliches Video. Klasse gemacht.
I wish I had a friend like you man lol, I bet you know how to survive and work on your bike with all kind of tips. What you do looks amazing to do but I couldn't survive alone with my knowledge lol
Definitely belt drivetrain is better as you concluded, I need to save to buy a belt drivetrain touring bike because I have big plans! Right now I’m touring with what I have, a 1993, 7 speed , Japanese Nishiki Meridian, chromoly steel and got a smaller chain ring and a bigger cassette to get 20.5 gear inches, I have crossed Central America and now doing the Colombian Andes, almost 4,000km. So getting that proper bike should not stop you from embarking in that adventure, I feel my bike is not ideal because of the geometry and want disc brakes and wider tires but I haven’t had any problem so far.
Cheers Payman! Say hello to Matilda, hope she is doing better now, we miss her!
Hi, well said 🙌🏼, never let the equipments to stop you from your adventures, you don't always need the best of the best. it is important to go out and live it!
I admire your tenacity .
2:07 : How to prevent curious people from touching and twisting the belt in your absence?
My surprise is I understand your English!
I'm French!
Good advice in your video!
If we compare the low line chain drivetrain to a belt with many Kms with no maintanace in bad conditions - maybe belt is better.
However, if we compare top of the line chain drivetrain which is properly maintained, ideally waxed, with a belt or shaft drives - they are inferior to chain currently.
Did you mean efficiency wise?
Aint nobody got time to clean and maintain chain and casssete weekly.
Thanks for the profound analysis ;) Good luck on your journey.
Peyman, thanks for the review! I’m wondering how many teeth your front and rear sprocket are? As heavily loaded as you are, I’m wondering these details of your drivetrain. I know you’re a strong guy but I’m curious if you are geared more for climbing. Thanks!
Hi Mark, Most welcome, front sprocket 39T and rear 32T :)
Thank you so much! Speaking of ecology: the chain is made of metal and easily recycled, not sure about the belt.
Yeah. It can’t be recycled. But neither do the billions of Kevlar belts used in automobiles and motorcycles that get tossed away every year
With over 6000 miles on my HaiBike (Bosch center drive) I'm looking forward to my next e bike being belt drive.
Keep us updated 😁🙌
i got a giant reign e+3 with normal chain and have almost 10k km down still with my first chain and the chain is still in good condition.
You compare a little bit apple with cherry aren’t you? Chain with derailleur is heavy stressed. With pinion or Rohloff it is completely different. How long lasts a chain with these hub gears please?
Your cycling adventures are epic!
get a suntour ncx as a suspension seatpost instead of the canecreek, it's a bit heavier but much better
thanks for suggestions, never tested this, but maybe in the future. so far been very happy with CaneCreek.
@@NomadsTrails the bushings wore down pretty quickly on the ones I had in the past.
Phooey. There's zero post open on my bikes.
Great review, thank you bro and safe travels. :)
🙏
My friend used the same belt (Cube Hyde race or something, fitness bike) and it broke in 18 moths. Needless to say this probably doesn't apply to all models, but we rode together for most of that 18 months, the chain happened to last some 5-6 month longer. Only had to replace it due to it expanding. For our experience, belt is not the way to go, but hey, tomato, tomato.
Why did it break though?
@Ulgima Corvus We can judge the belt performance based on one case IMO. Also how many km did u ride in 18 months? The cause of braking can be wrong way of handling the belt and braking the carbonfiber cords. In my experience and many other cyclists out there which I have spoken beafor publishing this video, belt lasts around 3 times more than chain. But if I buy a car and crash it I can't expect the car to work perfectly well the next day. 😊
The guy is sharing a story from experience and you're writing it off as a single incident? But your single experience should be the only truth? Instead it might be something you could learn from. Good luck on your gaslighting journey
@@whitelotus_zero I don't think we can learn much without understanding why the belt broke. It would be the same if the chain had broken instead of the belt. Was it an exceptional failure or due to normal wear and tear?
As with anything a sample of one isn't very accurate. Sounds like Nomad Trails is pulling from much more experience.
I would rethink posting little to no substance, escalating and making accusations.
@@whitelotus_zero you're not very bright
I'm surprised you didn't mention the noise. I'm not sure how it is with bicycles. But for electric motorbikes, one of the main reasons they use belt drives, is because it's much quieter than a chain.
LOVE IT!
what is your current bike specifications? Thanks
Thanks. Here you can read about my current bike: tout-terrain.de/de/die-produkte/fahrraeder/expedition/silkroad/1332/silkroad-xplore-ii-26?c=199
I have several old bicycles with chains. They are over 50 years old. Can you imagine belt after 50 years? It would turn into crispy paper.
Also I like to ride my bike on high gear standing on the pedals full weight. That would kill belt within weeks of riding. Belts works well where tension is smooth and constant, for example in the car where they drive item that have constant resistance.
If you're doing a world tour yes, if not, it's a lot of expense. As, of course it means some sort of internal gear system and a frame that can be separated. So you are looking at £1500 to £2500 extra.
indeed it is super the great option for a world tour.As you mentioned indeed it costs but if you have the financial possibility to get this drive train for even a commuting bike. in a long run it will pay off, because of the durability and also you won't change, clean and oil your drive train.
@@NomadsTrails but your belt cost 10 times more than a 11 speed chain.
also you mentioned changing the casete that is actually not necessary if you change your chain in the right time
U r a brave heart....adventure lover also bicycle lover
I wish I could trip like you are. But I am very very happy that you get to do it godbless
awesome video. even if the belt in itself isnt more sustinable than a chain due to the fact that its made out of rubber and carbon, concidering a Rohloff or Kindernay gearhub is preadjusted and will outlast most people, and you need no bearadjust,enttools and so on, I think its the most ecofriendly option. And you get more time riding your bike as a bonus:)
Nowadays bikes come mostly with 1 X 12 drive trains. My experience is the chain and cluster doesn't last long, so IMHO pinion with belt has better as it is lower waste
Hello, one aspect among the ecological ones is that the Gates Carbon drive cannot be recycled. If properly disposed of, a chain can be melted down while the carbon drive is hazardous waste.Liebe Grüße
Hi, i see your point. Being more ecological is an interesting question. It needs scientific research imo. true the chain drive train is made out of metal and metal is recyclable. but for making the chain drivetrain energy being used and for recycling it also, add on top of that all the transportation and packing material. also i am not sure if there is no way to recycle the belt. so this is something which needs a research. but my guess is belt is more ecological. but it is just my opinion i can't back it up with any data :)
@@NomadsTrails absolutely, there are so many aspects in that topic. It is music of the future but If things like "Elektrostahlverfahren" or Elektrolichtbogenöfen are running on "Renuable Energy" things made of metal would show their advantge. I hope we will see an ecologic transformation in the prodoction of our environment friendly Bikes and everything.
Liebe Grüße und gute Fahrt!🙋🏼♀️
Fluorine in many chain lubes is very toxic. (anything advertising teflon has fluorine in it)
Neither are most solvents used to keep especially dry lubes liquid for applying them good for environment.
I doubt there are many chain lubrifications which aren't harmfull for environment in one way or another.
And cleaning chains from the worst gunks needs pretty strong solvents.
@@tuunaes Totally right. It is a shame that most cyclists use harmful products and "need" a very clean chain. One product I would like to mention is Atlantic "Bio Kettenöl". It is made mostly of renewables and does not contain toxic stuff. It's biodegradable and it works fine also under our shitty conditions here in northern Germany with loads of mud, rain and salt for half a year. We clean our chains with rags and they shine! These products are milestones, I am not here to make an advertisement... Milestones in my eyes and products that harm the environment sould be forbidden because there are alternatives. With that and a proper recycling a chain can become environment friendly.
@@kaffeemitcola6506 Actually biodegradable doesn't automatically mean lack of harmfull for environment in some way substances.
It just requires them to break down.
That allows still lots of not entirely harmless things. (and renewable could be used even for botulinum toxin)
So without full list content it can't be known if it lacks harmfull in short term substances.
And clean drivertain is requirement for achieving chain's high efficiency.
Dirt in chain drive train will easily start degrading efficiency and also increase wear and tear: Dirt/sand contains lots of quartz, which harder than most metals.
Couple km on wet unpaved road is enough to have grinding machine going eating chain drive train.
So to be ecological any chain lubrification should also try to keep chain clean.
Internal gear hub with chain not belt is better. You even said you went from derailleur to internal with belt. Did you even tour with internal and chain? Good luck finding a belt in the middle of no where.
thanks for sharing your precious experiences.
How many gears does your hub have?
And were you comfortable going up hills?
Pretty cool! Thanks for sharing
Even though that belt is plastic/rubber whatever it's still strong. Cars use that kind of belt, in local old sawmill there's 3 friction belts what makes sawblade turn and it gets it power from traktor and those belts are soon 20 years old :D Very bad looking, but still working :D
Do you ever get issues with cable stretch affecting the gear changing on Rohloff/pinion etc? (I went to gevenalle friction shifting because of those issues) my cycle buddy is upgrading to Rohloff with belt drive. But I'm the mechanic out of the 2 of us
I had to adjust the Rohloff 2 times because of the this (I would guess). But I haven't touch the pinion. It works perfectly fine like a first day. 😊
Very well argument, good review, one more sub, when you visit Portugal?
i have a cube hybrid bicycle with bosch chain driven motor, for two years did no maintenance at all, my friend has specialized hybrid with belt, he is on his third motor in one year
Your friend most probably have a Brose middrive motor that are often used in Specialized ebikes. Within the motor itself is a belt that often tears up. It has nothing to do with the Gates carbon drivetrain, and there isn't any chain inside the Bosch motor itself as well. You will find Bosch motors or any other motor driving a chain on a bike, and find the same Bosch or other motor driving a belt on another bike. Inside a Bosch motor you will find only gears on the mechanical part of it, whereas in Brose motors you will find gears and a belt inside as well, which can be seen as the Achiles heel of the motor. On the flipside, the belt causes the Brose motors to be way less noisy as its competitors in the middrive section and having less friction, so that you feel less resistence when you ride the ebike without the motor support.
Hot waxing chains helps them stay clean.
I think a full chainguards, like the Dutch use on their grandma bikes, would keep a chain from having to be cleaned.
They need to make one that will work with derailleurs.
Encasing "chain salad" gear system would require huge box.
And not straight chain lines would still wear and tear parts.
6 years ago I saw a Cube tour bike with a partial plastic guard on a 3x.
I'm not surprised. Coming from a motorcycle rider I would take belt drive over chain any day. And I would take shaft drive over belt on top of that. I'm not sure if there are shaft driven bicycles out there....
Efficiency is more important on bike, so I don't think so.
I saw a prototype that looked cool, but it never made it to the market.
this guy is so badass it's just mindblowing
Odlican video,odlicno rečeno svaka cast,sta li je sledece sto ce izmisliti😃✌️✌️
Informative video.
What do you think about your Silkroad? Have you ever broken a spoke?
I want to comment on the topic efficiency: Whenever I mention belts to other cyclists I always get the comment: "But Efficiency". I think this is a very unfitting comment for two reasons:
1. The difference in efficiency isn't that great at all. You wouldn't feel it. This should only really matter to competitive cyclists, who care about every watt and every second.
2. The efficiency of a chain is only better when in perfect condition. In reality the efficiency of a chain drops much faster than that of a belt when in contact with moisture and dirt. This means that unless you're cleaning and relubricating your chain before every ride the belt is actually more efficient.
I agree 🙌
Good comment, I bike commute all year round and and by now I can clearly feel the difference between a well oiled, clean drivetrain and one that needs some love. It's a pretty arbitrary number but I'd say it feels like I need to work 10-20% harder.
Fair point!
I didn't even know there were bikes with belts until I saw this video
How is much upkeep is the hub? Also, I'm 90+ kilos and make a lot of torque, I would worry about damaging the gears on a expensive hub.
I kinda hate my belt drive system. Because they're so silent and smooth by design, the second they make even the tiniest bit of noise it drives me insane vs the constant clinking of chains and sprockets.
I also hate that they're a plain to tension properly compared to a chain, they make removing the rear wheel for flats a pain, and I can't fit a geared hub with my 350w hub motor.
Overall I just don't see the appeal as a commuter. Eventually I will probably look into replacing it with a chain