@@fozziedabear4782 God Bless our Police Officers that have to deal with this kind of ignorance on a daily basis. The patience they have to maintain when confronting such stupidity day in and day out is truly extraordinary. Whatever they are getting paid is nowhere near enough for the working conditions they have to endure.
I have learned that in America there is a secret law called “failing to kiss the cops’ as$”. All he had to do was look at the store cctv to find out if she did it but he preferred to taser the woman instead.
@@LCee7 Agreed, the man is horrible. Now Publix has to pay for their security officer's actions. No sympathy for this man. Hopefully Publix let him go.
SAME! And I have PTSD that is triggered nearly every time I see cops which triggers heart episodes and I pass out. Not ideal. I handed him my reciept and said "I have PTSD and a heart condition. I'm going to sit so I don't hit my head when I pass out in a few seconds. I'm okay. I don't need medics." By the time I woke up he had checked my receipt, told Walmart I didn't steal...and called medics lol.
Then you should be on your knees thanking her for standing up for your Civil Rights. This cop admitted he had NO IDEA if she paid for her things. He didn't even know what item he was looking for if he had her receipt! Stopped her car unlawfully with only one person's word and phone call, tased and handcuffed. Where's your brain?
Because of people continually and willingly giving up their rights police think they can do this. Charges were dropped and she received a settlement because the cop was wrong. Edit no settlement received because when you investigate yourselves you always come out on top.
The dipsh!t was just going for a money grab, and she got what she wanted. Thankfully her frivolous lawsuit got shot down, "with prejudiced", I love it! Thank goodness for body cams!
Showing a receipt is not that hard to prove your innocence. If you don't show your receipt, how will they know that the car is really stolen or not? It called common sense.
@@MisterMikeTexasYEAH AND THAT'S HOW THEY PROVE IT BY ASKING FOR A RECEIPT, SHE DIDN'T SHOW IT AND SO HE TASERED HER.. HE DID A GREAT JOB.. ARE YOU SERIOUSLY DEFENDING THAT LOW LIFE..
So she chose to be tazed and arrested instead of showing a receipt!? It's been a while since I've seen this high level of stupidity. Her parents must be so proud.
@@LAkadian They found the receipt, she purchased everything. She 👏 wuz 👏 jus 👏 keepin' 👏 it 👏 real 👏 yo! lol she tried to sue Publix for fiddy grand too. Case dismissed. Clearly a mental giant, this woman.
This exact thing happened to me last year, I was mistaken for a guy wearing similar clothes, I showed my receipt and after 30 seconds I was on my way, untazed and unhandcuffed.
I had a similar situation to this where I went through a self checkout line with about 5 items. One of them was a cooler that was too big for a bag so I put the other items in the cooler and then dragged it out. Im guessing an employee just saw the last second when I was pulling the cooler and told a cop that I might have been stealing. A cop approached me in the parking lot and asked if I had a receipt. Instead of arguing and yelling, I showed him the receipt and the other paid for items in a bag inside the cooler. He apologized and we both laughed about it and then I left. That entire interaction lasted about 20 seconds. I then went home and watched Netflix. It was a peaceful day.
In her case, no one saw her steal and no one saw facts giving reasonable suspicion that she stole. I hope she enjoys the money that she receives from Publix.
@@ToluRobertson Do you know how many times they got these situations and is true? Whatever the situation is, if an officer politely ask for your ID, receipts or any other document. Just hand it over.
He was also very wrong. She was right for standing up for her rights not to be searched without a search warrant. He had no credible suspicion of a crime
@@ET2carbon Wrong. If its said that she might've stolen something then he has a right to investigate. Her fault for not showing the dang receipt and causing so much drama with kids in her car
@@Sekou-yr2rrthat is not considered as a right. If the police ask you for a receipt, id, license etc you have to cooperate. He didn't ask to search her personal belongings, her faking receipt he asked for. You are enabling this behavior. It's not your right to deny, it's your duty to cooperate. You have it all wrong dear. Democracy comes with responsibilities not anarchy.
@@vlimavlima44 yeah you’re right. I got in my feelings because I’ve been accused of doing something I didn’t do & the police got involved. There’s no repercussions for people making frivolous accusations
The absolute division in these comments really shows where were at as a society. We can't even agree how laws should be enforced or how rights should be protected.
NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO STEAL! Why the situation worse than what it already is! I'm glad she didn't win her lawsuit! She provoked this reaction with her, "I can do what I want" ATTITUDE!
Why should we have to prove our innocence when men died in wars, real violent wars with real deaths and real blood shed to ensure our rights to be innocent until proven guilty? It may seem trivial to certain minded people currently until it starts to infringe on their rights. Everything starts small then grows out of hand. One tiny right at a time will be taken until we have none left.
@@mistyevans8160 Stop lying about the law. "Innocent until proven guilty" is for the courtroom, not for a lawful police stop. Your drama queen act does not make your lies any truer.
Literally🤦♂️ 80% of these videos are people not following basic orders from an officer where quick compliance would have them going on with the rest of their day
@@bear3663No they don’t. There may be a store policy not to engage, but security officers have an inherent right to stop someone and detain them if they believe they have shoplifted.
@@captainkev10 My information is from the court documents. The reason why the case was dismissed was because they had settled amicably out of court. She had filed a stipulated motion to dismiss, which is why the case was dismissed.
Exactly. The officer did what he was called to do. How else would he have handled the situation? Everyone is saying it was an unlawful stop, but if the store called him, he needs to look into it. How else besides asking for the receipt? Is she really $50,000 richer now over this? if she is, then she knew exactly what she was doing.
For those who are curious, she was charged with resisting without violence and spent 24 hours in jail before all charges were dropped. She did file a $50,000 lawsuit against Publix, but it was later dismissed
@@thefather5765 You dont have to prove your innocence or help them investigate. The police had zero evidence to escalate that to the point of force used.
It doesn't need to. The officer was committing crimes against this woman. His personal opinion of her doesn't matter, only the legal one does and he had no lawful reason to detain her in the first place.
@@Suzi.68 That's not really accurate though. No one stated that she stole anything. They didn't watch as she checked out, that's not a crime on her part, nor is it reasonable suspicion of one. They're just mad that she didn't show a receipt after they failed to watch her checkout. Perhaps they should pay more attention in the future.
She wanted this to happen. Plus she did it in front of her kids! How sad! I feel so sorry for our men and women in the blue who has to put up with this crap from ppl
@@blueforest4589 Except for the fact that the accusers were the store employees and she was still in the parking lot which is the stores property. If she was accused and on the property she DID have to show proof of purchase. They arent just gonna let someone accused of stealing who was on the property items were stolen from walk free. On private property all you need to be accused of stealing is word from the store manager, failure to comply with proof of purchase or waiting until the store can provide proof you didnt purchase the items is grounds for detainment until said proof is provided. She then resisted arrest which, no matter the circumstances, is illegal.
Ummm you meant incredibly forceful. Call the supervisor means call the supervisor. Not play judge and jury. Then tell bystanders to leave and get away and not record? Where is the patience
@@billreamer2524 Officer was in the right, people crowding around just makes the scene worse, he was trying to defuse the situation and this woman is obviously looking for attention/victim status.
I was accused of walking out on a tab at IHOP. The manager told cops inside of IHOP that me and three friends skipped out without paying. The cops ran outside and detained us very aggressively. The waitress came out screaming at the cops telling them that she told us to leave payment on the table. We also tipped very generously. After all of that the manager was fired I was given a $100 dollar voucher. The police department pulled me over 3 days later and apologized to me face to face.
You live in a wild country. In Russia, in this case, they would not aggressively detain you. They would just talk to you if you didn't pay. If you refuse to pay, you will be taken to the police to issue you a fine. Nobody would draw a gun. He would have been in a closed holster. In Russia, police officers kill about 10 people a year during arrest. Most of these killings take place in the Caucasus. There are terrorists there, it is difficult to negotiate with them.
@@intuitivefire Do you people not read descriptions before jumping to conclusions? Description of vid: "Following her arrest, the officer found the receipt that proved she rightfully purchased the goods. The woman later sued Publix for $50,000 in damages"
This is why my brother gave up being a cop. There is just to much negativity being a police officer. He actually was an Minneapolis officer and left before the george Floyd arrest
Well they don't exactly get out on the streets to fight and bring down the most malicious criminals. The crimes they should be fighting and working to prevent or taper aren't being carried out as their top priority. It's more BS like this and traffic ticketing . The petty stuff . And for the record not all cops are pieces of crap but some are
I don't know his situation, but I believe he should have stayed on the force because he could have made a difference and touch some kids life in the area
It’s a business, all it take it’s them to say we don’t think she paid. The police then investigate… she obstructed and interfered with an investigation??? If you are innocent you do not act like this towards police officers who are simply trying to INVESTIGATE
@@bear3663 No she's at fault for not showing a receipt. The store called the cops for possible theft so he has every right to investigate. But she's the one causing the mess by being difficult. Learn the law kiddo
@@FunGamerFever She isn't required to prove her innocence. The store didn't accuse her of stealing and their security officer didn't see her steal either.
This had nothing to do with pride and principles, this was just a straight up attempt to get 15 minutes of fame and a golden lawsuit settlement… she thought she had a cash cow here, which the judge proved otherwise, and all of this foolishness right in front of her children, giving them a lifetime of traumatic memories from this nonsense! What a great mother…
We see this behavior all the time. This Officer gave this woman so many chances. All she had to do was hand over that slip of paper and the Officer would have let her go. She turned this whole thing into something it didn't need to be. Our actions have consequences. 😒
@bear3663 , did she win it? I looked it up yesterday, it said the suit was dropped or something like that. What crimes do you think were committed against this woman?
@@kendrasowell2411 Yes, Publix paid her, which is why she motioned for the court to dismiss the case with prejudice. He unlawfully detained her without reasonable suspicion of a crime. He assaulted her and committed false Imprisonment.
@@bear3663they paid her nothing “nope :). “The woman later sued Publix for $50,000 in damages. The case was dismissed with no settlement by a Duval County Florida judge in December 2021.” Publix paid nothing and she cannot file anymore lawsuits. Happy to educate you
@@dougk5187 The cop was wrong Upon arrival, the woman told the officer that she had a receipt but refused to show him and accused employees of racially profiling her. After questioning the woman multiple times, the officer stated he was going to arrest and tase her, which he did shortly after. Following her arrest, the officer found the receipt that proved she rightfully purchased the goods. The woman later sued Publix for $50,000 in damages. The case was dismissed with prejudice by a Duval County Florida judge in December 2021.
The cop had alternative choices. One choice, was to have Publix provide evidence of their allegation. The choice of the cop was to not expect the accused person to prove their innocense .. because in America we are presumed innocent until proven guilty. If Publix was refusing to allow the officers to review video inside the store, then it was in fact Publix who was not cooperating with the investigation, in which they bore the burden of providing evidence to support the allegation they were making. This woman actually went to a register with a cashier present , so another choice the officer could have made , was to go inside and speak with the cashier's. He and no other officer made what should have been the most reasonable choice ... INVESTIGATE. A mininmum wage worker making an accusation does not constitute probable cause. Without probable cause, there should be no expectation of an officer to perform a search of person or their vehicle without their consent. That is another right afforded to us , as American citizens. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits searches of persons and their properties without a warrant executed by a judge, the motor vehicle exception still demands probable cause exist for the search to be considered LEGAL. This woman stood on her rights, right's this officer was very well aware of as he entered into this engagement. He understood the limitations the law provided him , and CHOSE to exceed those limitations. Ultimately she was innocent, and acted within reason to her rights as an American.
Obviously you didn’t read the description where it says all charges were dropped because she bought and had a receipt. She is also suing Publix for $50,000. So shut it bozo.
@@aljigga Obviously you didn't read my subsequent comment and response defending her for having the receipt. Still doesn't change the fact she refused to show it. This is how things escalate. Bozo!
@@rajakandabowla6194 Maybe spend a few decades of your life being followed around in stores, accused stealing and generally treated like a suspect and then get back to me on how you'd react.
Good thing you said "literally". I 'd hate for anyone to think you were speaking rhetorically. Or hyperbolically. Or ironically. Thank you for making that distinction.
“Hey there ma’am, some workers in the store didn’t see you pay. Can I see your receipt?” “Sure, I’ve got it right here.” “Thanks, you have a good day now”. She chose getting tased and spending the night in jail over this interaction.
This interaction never should have happened in the first place. She paid for her items and there was no reasonable suspicion to detain her. She went to jail because of the officer's criminal actions.
@@Galbator-hz5sz An officer can't detain on mere suspicion, but it has to be based on facts giving reasonable suspicion of a crime. Refusing to show a receipt isn't reasonable suspicion. Watching someone pick up items and not pay at checkout would be reasonable suspicion.
@@bear3663 the employees told him she didn't pay that's enough to be detained, not arrested. On the other side she could have remained silent and not showed him anything but she didn't follow the lawful order out of the car.
@@brad4187 Burden of proof is on the accusers.. Not the other way around. Why did you steal my car? Should you know be investigated? How do you prove you didn't steal it?
My gym is in the same shopping center. It's the only Publix I've ever been to that has a police officer parked in front and standing in the lobby from open to close 7 days a week. The nearby Walmart has such massive shoplifting problems, they also have security in the parking lot and the lobby at all times. It's also the only Walmart left that doesn't have ANY self-checkouts. I used to joke with my friends that I moved to a side of town that you need a bullet proof vest to do your errands, and it's not because of the cops. I've had to duck and run for cover in our Walmart a few times over the years due to gang activity, as well as loss prevention tackling people trying to run out after getting caught shoplifting.
Why is it that people of a certain group on national news are disproportionately robbing, stealing, and destroying property and expect to be treated like upstanding, law abiding citizens?
The store made that claim. Nobody else did. I believe, and I don't know the full story and what that officer had done prior to the encounter, they should have asked for some semblance of evidence before making that probable cause.
Would it be easier to show receipt? Yes maybe so, but the accuser should be providing the evidence. It's innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent... if she didn't steal anything, she shouldn't have to prove it to someone who is falsely accusing her...
people who are guilty. She may have gone to jail but she was guilty of nothing when the police enocuntered her. She had stolen NOTHING. She acted irrationally but she did not attempt to harm the arresting officer. She was falsely accused and many would act irrationally at that point.
Law Enforcement needs to be uprooted, demolished and replaced with something more just and equitable. Law Enforcement are modern day slave catchers and slave patrol.
Haha, yeah these Terminatrixs' are starting to become highly resistant to conventional tasers and stun guns, they need to increase the voltage or wattage or whatever is holding the electrical charge. In most cases people tased immediately lock up and fall, she was actually resisting the charge and seemed to still have some fight in her after her collapse to the ground, though the taser did it's job, I'd say it was just barely effective.
This happened to me before. I showed the officer my receipt, he apologized and I went on with my day. 1 minute inconvenience turned into jail time and traumatization of a kid..grade A parent right here.
he is begging her .. he's trying to stop it from escalating. I show my receipt every time I leave Costco. I am not offended. Woman has chip on her shoulder.
Amen I can honestly say that my mother would have behaved like a lady and for that matter it was police officers who saved her life and my fathers. Great job officer.
For $50,000 tase me 10 times. We the people have no obligation to aid in an investigation. Our rights are eroding by the day because of sheep like you just going along to get along. Hopefully she sues the cop and his agency for violating her civil rights. Hope this officer has long career as a dog catcher. Thats about the ceiling for his investigation skills. Someone who knows their rights and stands up for them sir is no fool. I call them Patriots. If you enjoy freedom?
@@russ7414 you're correct. I work with cops and attorneys everyday in local govt. Most just do their job. Others don't know how to do their jobs and are low IQ. Most cops aren't super intelligent actually
Worse there not her kids and she teaches these lessons too them...also leaves her sisters kids kids in the vehicle while she steals she has no receipt if so why not take the kids in why not show it she has none
I m blk and this is crazy. Just show your receipt. You have kids watching just show the receipt. This is uncalled for. We are not always right. Period.
Seriously, those poor kids. No child needs that kind of trauma over some misplaced sense of pride or whatever it was making her choose the taser and jail over nothing.
@@jeremyhodges7956 She had her receipt and refused to show it. 🤔 Officer was doing his job and deserves an apology from this woman. She wanted this hassle.
Okay, I completely understand what it feels like to be accused of something you didn’t do. It’s happened to me. However, when you have evidence or proof of something, YOU hold the power because you just pull out the receipt, say absolutely nothing and go on your merry way. These situations where you’re arguing, wasting time, getting angry, frustrated etc. It just shows the other person that they’re getting under your skin. I’ve been pulled over twice in my life by police. One time for speeding as I was on the way to the hospital to see my dad who’d been taken I’ll. I quietly got in their car, explained things and I was asked to attend a speed awareness course that’s all. The second time, I had no MOT because it slipped my mind after the death of my sister. Again, I explained the circumstances and they let me go. Not saying all police and civilian interactions go well but in this case, just show the receipt and then make your complaint afterwards.
There is no requirement to prove your own innocence . Either the cop has evidence and probable cause enough to make an arrest or he does not. You are in no way legally responsible to help with the cop's investigation.
@@coltonrusso3011 An employee not watching her go through the checkout is not reasonable suspicion of a crime. If they saw her stealing, THEN that would be reasonable suspicion. If they saw her pick up items from the shelf and walk out of the store, THAT would be reasonable suspicion of a crime. Her paying with a cashier, and there being an employee who didn't watch her do so, that's not her fault and is not evidence of a crime. They didn't call 911, the officer was working as security for Publix.
I've been a police officer in a major metropolitan police department for 23 years now. I have experience. I am now going to tell you how the law works in this instance. You can agree or disagree, but the law is the law. Any crime that is categorized as a misdemeanor and was NOT committed in the presence of an officer (in other words the officer did not witness the crime), that crime needs to have a victim who wants to press charges. In that instance, the officer is basically facilitating a citizen's arrest on behalf of that victim. That is exactly what is occurring in this video. The officer is conducting an investigation into a possible crime, in which the victim (the store with the employee acting on behalf of the store) wants to place the individual under arrest for the theft they believe she committed. An officer faced with this situation basically has three options; Option #1- Investigate to find proof of guilt (or innocence). Option #2- Don't investigate and cite and release or arrest solely based on the statement of the victim (in that case, the victim/store assume all legal responsibilities). Option #3- The victim decides they want nothing done and the officer let's the person go, whether they are guilty or not (the option all cops prefer) In this video, the officer was doing his best to achieve the #1 option and help the woman prove her innocence. The officer is wrong in that the woman's decision to not show a receipt is absolutely her right. Her decision to not identify herself is also her right. But those decisions leave the officer with no choice but to go with option #2 (keeping in mind that the victim is wanting to press charges). In this case, the officer is acting on behalf of the victim and facilitating THEIR arrest. Once the officer has told you that you are under arrest (which this officer did a multiple of times), it is of course still your legal right to not say anything or hand over the receipt, but you certainly do not have the right to physically resist the officer, or not comply with his/her verbal commands (you actually never have that right, which I can explain further if someone wants). The officer has not only the legal right to take you into custody, but a duty to do so on behalf of the victim who is requesting the arrest/cite. Now, on top of the theft charge, you will receive an additional misdemeanor charge of resisting an officer. If the officer gets injured during the resisting, it becomes a felony resisting charge. Now to the tasing part..........While I would not have tased this woman, that doesn't mean the officer was not lawful in doing so. In order to tase someone, an officer must have a present threat of physical danger. In other words, you can't tase someone who is running away from you or someone who is just verbally uncooperative. But someone who is squaring up with you like a boxer or wrestler, or in this case, someone who has already proven they are going to fight you if you go hands on (like this lady did at 3:48), is able to be legally tased. Again, while I would not have tased this woman, she was still legally "taserable". I know getting tased looks bad, but let's not forget that she put herself AND THOSE KIDS in that situation. Bottom line is officer was 100% legal in what he did. Could he have handled it different and not tased her? Sure...But then the officer is actually going hands on and fighting with her. I guess you have to "pick your poison". I hope this helps people understand from an officer/legal point of view. I welcome all questions, but please don't come at me with rude comments. thnx
So what about when the woman offers to go to the store to confirm she paid and the officer says no? He does not allow her to prove her innocence the way she wanted. He wanted done his way imo and he infact did taser an innocent person.
Finally an intelligent cop who understands that law. Her mistake was resisting. I would have remained silent or told cop if I don't show you the receipt am I under threat of arrest? If he says yes, I would compy under threat of arrest and take it up with a lawyer. Interesting how many make false reports, 911 calls and cops never harass or arrest them. When will they arrest those who make false reports, complaints or 911 calls?
He had no lawful commands to issue. None. Therefore he had no right to use force. She does not have to comply with unlawful commands. He was investigating an alleged crime and she’s not required to aid in that investigation. There was no legal grounds for him to issue any commands until he had PC. This encounter was consensual because he was investigating hearsay. She did not have to comply. He just cost the city a couple hundred grand, and I’m sure Publix will get sued as well.
😩 I love how the cop made sure he turned off the camera right at the end because he knew the woman was right the whole time and he didnt want you to see him asking that guy if there was anyway to view the camera footage 😭 thats what he started saying it right before he turned it off
Exactly. Years ago I was leaving a store and lost prevention came out and asked me for my receipt. I gave it to them and went on my way. I did not get hysterical.
Imagine been beaten by a terrorist who should have been acting as a cop, I didn't see any evidence of a crime apart from hearsay, the people who accused this woman and the terrorist should now be beaten, eye for and eye
@@trvman1 do you think the burden on proof should be on the individual? You would be perfectly fine living in a police state in which cops have the authority to require you to present whatever papers they want you to present whenever they want it, without a reasonable suspicion or probable cause? Case law has held that witness testimony isn’t grounds for a detainment, and this video exemplifies why perfectly. Humans are unreliable, and often get things wrong or mistaken things to be something they’re not. You know, if tomorrow everyone just gave in to liberals and started to stop fighting gun restrictions then we’d just lose those rights….. The moment you stop using your God given rights is the moment you lose them. Yeah you could give them up and just show the receipt, but why? We are not second class citizens to LEOs, we have rights that are supposed to protect us from these things.
That's fine. If you ever get pulled over and the police ask you to get out of the car, be sure to stay in your car. Then if they ask you to put your hands out the window, be sure not too. If they just ask to see your license and insurance, be sure to refuse to do that. Then if they approach your car, be sure to drive away because you feared for you life with the police just asking you to do some SIMPLE thing(s). Then be SURE to say you didn't do anything wrong as the judge watches the video. :) I would LOVE to see what you do when you go out of a Walmart and they ask to see your receipt. I would bet you would not show it, cause a scene and most likely get arrested and then sue WalMart and the police. Not that you would win, but I am sure you would not mind eating the lawyers fees to prove your point.
@@trvman1 You ignored everything I said and responded with whataboutism 😂 You are the embodiment of ignorance. You may be fine with giving up your freedom to politicians and police but the majority of this country is not. If a cop came knocking on your front door today, and told you they were searching your house because your neighbor made up whatever reason he wanted, I’m sure you’d let them in and do a full search eh? Without a reasonable suspicion or probable cause. That’s simply because you are a follower, a sheep, that will be herded wherever your masters want you to go. Why? Most likely due to your genetics and child rearing. Poor unfortunate you.
I went to Walmart yesterday and bought maybe 10 grocery items. I never bag my items. As I was leaving the greeter asked me for my receipt for the first time in many years. Because I have not stolen anything since I was 6 years old, I was briefly offended, but showed it to him. I asked him if he was asking everyone for receipts. He stalled but then told me it was because I had not bagged my items. Like I said, I never do and never get stopped. But, I am not going to make a scene or harass some older guy who has to check people.
You’re actually under 0 obligation to show the Wal-mart greeter your receipt since you did not agree to that prior to entering the store. Only places like Sams club, Costco, etc are allowed to do so because you agree to it in order to be a member. However, if a cop walks up to you and asks to see the receipt because there is suspicion of you not paying for an item, you have to provide it because theft is a crime. Now if she were just minding her own business and wasn’t suspected of theft, she wouldn’t have to provide anything to the cop.
@@GraV21 she was minding her own business. Publix didn't accuse her of stealing anything and the cop said he didn't know if she stole anything or not. If he was so unsure if a crime had been committed why did he escalate it to physical violence?
@@evorider3689 you think not showing a receipt is escalating the situation to be tased? The cop had a choice and he tased her for not showing him a receipt. She offered to go back in the store but he refused, that is being uncooperative.
@@nikkimcdonald4562 he said that’s because he doesn’t have access to the cameras. The theft prevention team are the ones who likely notified the cops. All she had to do was pull out the receipt and prove everyone wrong and file a complaint/get a lawyer afterwards. Instead, she would rather fight and argue with the cop not caring at all for the kids in her custody. This is never okay. He wasn’t being disrespectful whatsoever. Publix def were accusing her, that’s why what looked like the two store managers were outside. The store has a right to protect its property especially if they never see you checkout. That’s why she lost her lawsuit.
I had what should have been, a confrontation with a fast food employee, while my 12 year old nephew was in the passenger seat. I look back on that very valuable lesson I taught him: negotiate, deescalate situations. The person in the drive-thru was rude at first and then I was polite in return- I didn't blow up things because he didn't have what I initially wanted. Instead,I thanked him and the establishment for what they were able to give us. We ended up getting a good discount. My nephew was impressed and I still remember his words: you didn't make a big deal, talked to him the right way - mom would have made the biggest scene. Be careful how you conduct yourself in front of the children in your life.
That’s fast food. I’ll teach my kids to stand for their rights and not give them up. To not cower to public servants who wish to violate my constitutional rights. I wore this country’s uniform to defend my rights and you better believe I won’t be violated
@@mathewserrano2262 Well, good for you Rambo. You’re going to be fighting the windmill all your life and you’re carrying on the legacy of bull headed opposition toward any kind of authority to your son so he can be like minded, assuring a life of confrontation. BTW, did you have that same attitude toward those placed in authority in the military? You know, those officers who admitted you had all the rights and then apologized to you for “defending your rights”? Yea, right.
@@dynodon331 the military is not a democracy. The constitution doesn’t apply the same. I’d be proud if my son didn’t lay down like a coward. Stand for something or live on your knees
Premises have cctv and full of guards, they have to issue evedence first to accused someone of stealing. They can not forced someone to show their proof of not stealing whey they're have no evidence
@@secondary5913 1) She can refuse to give id because he is questioning her about a misdemeanor (5th amendment). 2) she does not need to show a receipt, there is zero legal standing for her to have to provide one. 3) he saw kids in the backseat and claimed she left them in the car, but he is assuming that, he cannot prove it. 4) he admitted he did not see any video. Finally, there is no state where a police officer can make an arrest for a misdemeanor they did not witness, with a few exceptions. Theft is not one of those misdemeanor exceptions. There is a reason the charges got dismissed. This was a bad arrest.
@@secondary5913 Do you show receipt or do you earn 50K because officer did everything wrong. Innocent till proven guilty not guilty till proven innocent.
I know exactly what you mean, Martin. Imagine having to deal with being racially profiled every day. You could not pay me enough to have dark skin in this country.
She had no obligation to do so and the officer had no legal standing to arrest her since burden of proof is on the accusing party. She was protected by the 4th amendment from unreasonable searches or seizures. Someone simply saying they believed she stole something did not merit the officers actions. An officer educated on law they are supposed to enforce would have known this but then again there is an IQ cap as to how smart you can be to be police.
Poor kids..my heart breaks for them. As a mom, I would NEVER put on a show like this, especially if my kids were present. That stuff stays with kids..forever.
She settled outside of court. Meaning: that she was not in the wrong and they were. How could she have known she was going to be followed and detained unlawfully? I respect our officers, but they need to fully know what laws they are trying to enforce. And not try to strip our rights. Those were not her children, but she showed them how to stand up for their rights. The officer was in the wrong. So the lawsuit she settled for an undisclosed amount says. And before a reply says it was publix, yes indeed. This particular officer was working for publix that day.
Imagine, as a parent, putting your ego above your children and choosing to make them watch something that will probably be engraved in their minds forever. That short but very important experience will have a huge impact on them.
@@viralsheddingzombie5324 I can say with 100% confidence and years of experience, this is exactly how EVERY accused shoplifter acts. They instantly go full batshit crazy to make as big of a scene as possible in hopes you let them go.
Between showing the officer the receipt and getting tasered I would have easily chosen the first option 🤔😮 I completely understand the woman sentimient and frustration but one has to choose their battles 🤷🏻♀️
As a cop is it so hard to go in the store with her as she asked to check the cameras and yes they can get access to the cameras if they simply asked Now i know she was wrong to resist after he said she was under arrest but why oh why wont they simply do their job and do their investigation 1st b4 escalating situations and customers dont have to show their receipts
To me it is a decision of what will be less of an intrusion into my life. I can stand my ground and get into a conflict with an officer where I go to jail...or I can show the receipt. Maybe I have the right not to show it...but what action do I choose to end the situation with the least intrusion into my life...I show the receipt.
Your choice :) it's called freedom babby :) nothing wrong with strechen them rights when you wana. nothing wrong with complying to get things over faster. For all we know this poor lady keeps getting the stink eye from one person in that store and has complied in the past.
@@Zagroseckt If she didn't steal anything just show the freaking receipt. Now she has a car full of kids that are traumatized was it worth it I think not!
Because of complacent idiots like you, that's why this things happen. Everything is now whatever cops want to do rather the correct process for things and respecting rights
Everybody knows that when you're innocent and can immediately prove it, the best course of action is to deny everything and make it appear as though you are 100% guilty!
hmm, so an accusation and an assumption is all it takes to be required to prove your innocent? didn't this happen in the United States? (innocent until PROVEN guilty?) ps. not assisting a LEO with their investigation is not obstruction. while the LEO is at it mabey they should demand she show the title or a bill of sale for the vehicle she's driving. maybe a receipt for the clothes and shoes she's wearing too. or mabey go talk to the complainant? see if they can provide any evidence of her guilt? 🤔
COP: Hi ma'am, I was called here to investigate a shoplifting. Do you happen to have a receipt of your purchase? WOMAM: Yes I do. Here you go. COP: Thanks, Have a great day!
Cop- "There is reason to believe that you were shoplifting. Can I see your receipt?" Woman- "No, I'm not going to do that because that makes no sense at all." CULTURE
If he suspected of her a crime. Then do his job and investigate. Ask witnesses. If not. You have no proof. So you have to let her go. It's not the other way around for her to help with his investigation. Clearly he didn't do his job.
This woman was willing to walk back in the store and waste all that time going through security footage to prove that she didn't steal...but was unwilling to simply show a reciept to prove that she didn't steal and be on her way
@@Andriggdy17 Yes, and? She could have simply showed the receipt and been on her way, but she wanted to escalate things into an arrest so she could pursue a lawsuit instead.
She should have complied whether she stole or not! She had children in the car who are going to be forever traumatized by her are not caring enough about them! All over a receipt and her not caring !!!
The story is easy. Any American citizen is INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty....it's a recent phenomenon where the police like to think the opposite is true now...that you have to PROVE your Innocence or get arrested.
I must commend this cop for being polite respectful, soft-spoken and self-restraining, with this intransigent lady. It's very simple! Just show your receipt to prove you paid for the product you have, from the shop. Profiled or not profiled, the law says you must do this, on demand by a competent authority. What's so difficult to show a receipt?
I liked how the cop was being polite, respectful, soft-spoken and self restraining, with this intransigent lady. the best part was when the cop was speaking in a soft spoken tone. soft spoken tone relaxes my anxiety.
I would have showed my receipt, especially with children in the car, and deal with the situation later, if I was racially profiled like she said. The children should not have seen this !
i would not have shown my receipt. if i did not steal no way im going to show it. only thing she did wrong was resist. if she didnt resist, and didnt steal, it would be a good law suit.
Yeah but, it would have been a lot easier if the police officer would have followed her advice and gone into the store and reviewed the video tape and questioned the witnesses like any other normal police officer!!!
@@jeremyhodges7956 Well, I wouldn't go as far as saying she staged it from the start. But, I think it's fairly obvious that she was bothered by the fact that she was asked for a receipt, and then tried to escalate that into a lawsuit. There are clues all over the place. She slipped up and said she didn't have the receipt, when she actually did have it, and she stopped mid-sentence, as if she realized it was a bad idea to outright lie, and wanted to take her words back. She also repeatedly asked to be Tased... who would do that? And, despite how many times she was warned that she needs to provide identification (mainly in the longer version of this video, not this one that clips out the first half), she refused to provide ID. It's definitely as if she wanted to get herself Taser'd and arrested.
@@jeremyhodges7956 What they do is scan something and put it back in the cart like they didn't already scan it, then when they get ready to leave they put on an act like a typical shoplifter does and puts the item from the cart into the bag skipping the scanner. This is why they ask for reciepts and not just hold them in the security office waiting for police pickup.
These children are being taught from over emotional adult children, they will become the same as the adults that teach them, it’s a vicious never ending cycle
@@pjp7259 it slowly ends as these children slowly realize (some don’t of course) that they’re parents are it good role models, they see the officer being nice and will never forget how both behaved, some people realize that and some don’t, it’s up to these children to wake up as they grow up and end the cycle edit: not good role models
@@gotti512 I mean who wouldn't knowing whats going todays world cause of gas going up food prices going up,This is why everyone is starting to do this.and especially when I whent to a store yesterday the eggs were almost $5.00 I almost cried. 😭
So many yellow bellied, un American cowards, willing to roll over and give their rights up to PUBLIC SERVANTS. What a joke that you’re willing to give up constitutional rights to dressed up clowns with a tin badge. The “Don’t tread on me” crowd? More like “let me roll over and step on me daddy, while I lick your boots” crowd. Sickening and un American. Founders and vets are rolling over in their graves
![ไลฟ์สุ่ม iPhone 295 บาท... โกงมั้ย?[ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.97 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gdstHEE4UUE/mqdefault.jpg)
Hand clapping is a time honored technique to prove innocence.
And head moving side to side
It's very scary we share the same streets with these styles of people
Agreed, and the fact that they wear badges and have guns is even scarier!
Police?
It’s a terrifying thing to know these tyrants are out here
@@fozziedabear4782 I think he’s talking about the woman
@@fozziedabear4782 God Bless our Police Officers that have to deal with this kind of ignorance on a daily basis. The patience they have to maintain when confronting such stupidity day in and day out is truly extraordinary. Whatever they are getting paid is nowhere near enough for the working conditions they have to endure.
After watching all these videos, I have learned one thing. Clapping your hands and yelling over cops ALWAYS makes the situation better.
Lol
The dimwitted bufoons over on twitter disagree. Which means, without a doubt that you are correct.
lol
I would like, but funny number
I have learned that in America there is a secret law called “failing to kiss the cops’ as$”. All he had to do was look at the store cctv to find out if she did it but he preferred to taser the woman instead.
So sick of these people.
Yeah, I'm sick of store security unlawfully detaining paying customers without reasonable suspicion of a crime.
@@bear3663 I’m sick of nasty people. It takes a few brain cells not act like a complete fool. Most people cause their own damned issues. No sympathy.
@@LCee7 Agreed, the man is horrible. Now Publix has to pay for their security officer's actions. No sympathy for this man. Hopefully Publix let him go.
YOU SAID IT!
And it’s getting worse thanks to the incompetent and corrupt administration running America into the ground.
I get why she’s angry, and I’ve been in the same situation. However, unlike her, I showed my receipt, got an apology, and I went home.
Imagine that, complying and being let go.
SAME! And I have PTSD that is triggered nearly every time I see cops which triggers heart episodes and I pass out. Not ideal. I handed him my reciept and said "I have PTSD and a heart condition. I'm going to sit so I don't hit my head when I pass out in a few seconds. I'm okay. I don't need medics." By the time I woke up he had checked my receipt, told Walmart I didn't steal...and called medics lol.
you sound like a normal person with common sense…
Then you should be on your knees thanking her for standing up for your Civil Rights. This cop admitted he had NO IDEA if she paid for her things. He didn't even know what item he was looking for if he had her receipt! Stopped her car unlawfully with only one person's word and phone call, tased and handcuffed. Where's your brain?
Because of people continually and willingly giving up their rights police think they can do this. Charges were dropped and she received a settlement because the cop was wrong.
Edit no settlement received because when you investigate yourselves you always come out on top.
I heard that if you clap your hands while yelling, it means you’re right
Sounds legit... 10/10 would try 😳
It only works if you keep repeating the same phrase over and over again while clapping
Haa!!! Haha 👍
It is so annoying when they clap like that
LOL🤣
He was very calm and patient. She caused so much drama
Yeah,peoples like drama
@@MilaKorolyovaThose kinds of people are called Karens. The people i focken hate
OK KAREN
The dipsh!t was just going for a money grab, and she got what she wanted. Thankfully her frivolous lawsuit got shot down, "with prejudiced", I love it!
Thank goodness for body cams!
@@anitasparks5841ok wakanda
Showing a receipt is not that hard to prove your innocence. If you don't show your receipt, how will they know that the car is really stolen or not? It called common sense.
Or, picking your battles wisely. Somethings are just not worth fighting over!
It's not on you to prove innocence. It's on the prosecution to prove you guilty.
Wonder what she does to the old Walmart greeters that I asked for the receipt on the way out at Walmart 😬
@@kevinmalone3210exactly. sometimes being happy and at peace is better than being right. Now all this inconvenience for nothing. smh
@@MisterMikeTexasYEAH AND THAT'S HOW THEY PROVE IT BY ASKING FOR A RECEIPT, SHE DIDN'T SHOW IT AND SO HE TASERED HER.. HE DID A GREAT JOB.. ARE YOU SERIOUSLY DEFENDING THAT LOW LIFE..
So she chose to be tazed and arrested instead of showing a receipt!? It's been a while since I've seen this high level of stupidity. Her parents must be so proud.
Because she stole, and the items in her possession were not on the recepit, or she had no receipt.
Her parents are monkeys
@@LAkadian They found the receipt, she purchased everything. She 👏 wuz 👏 jus 👏 keepin' 👏 it 👏 real 👏 yo! lol she tried to sue Publix for fiddy grand too. Case dismissed. Clearly a mental giant, this woman.
Stupidity is in epic proportions in America today. The dumbing down of America has arrived full force.
Because she was being profiled by store employees... and she was tired of it
This exact thing happened to me last year, I was mistaken for a guy wearing similar clothes, I showed my receipt and after 30 seconds I was on my way, untazed and unhandcuffed.
Enjoyed your groceries and all too I bet
Exactly
Good job laying down and letting them violate your rights.
Its just disgusting behavior, would have taken a few seconds to show him and saved those children that trauma. So selfish
Another unevolved, brain dead pos who can't follow simple instructions
I had a similar situation to this where I went through a self checkout line with about 5 items. One of them was a cooler that was too big for a bag so I put the other items in the cooler and then dragged it out. Im guessing an employee just saw the last second when I was pulling the cooler and told a cop that I might have been stealing.
A cop approached me in the parking lot and asked if I had a receipt. Instead of arguing and yelling, I showed him the receipt and the other paid for items in a bag inside the cooler.
He apologized and we both laughed about it and then I left.
That entire interaction lasted about 20 seconds.
I then went home and watched Netflix.
It was a peaceful day.
In her case, no one saw her steal and no one saw facts giving reasonable suspicion that she stole. I hope she enjoys the money that she receives from Publix.
Nah dude, that cop wanted to taze you, you just got lucky - thats how these idiots think.
@@ToluRobertson Do you know how many times they got these situations and is true? Whatever the situation is, if an officer politely ask for your ID, receipts or any other document. Just hand it over.
I hate to "yea but" you (having said that you know I am going to, lol) but, you didn't steal anything.
But you missed the chance to sue them for $50K
That officer was very patient! Her stupidity speaks volumes!
He was also very wrong. She was right for standing up for her rights not to be searched without a search warrant. He had no credible suspicion of a crime
@@ET2carbon Wrong. If its said that she might've stolen something then he has a right to investigate. Her fault for not showing the dang receipt and causing so much drama with kids in her car
That cop is a bully. Fighting for your rights is not stupidity
@@Sekou-yr2rrthat is not considered as a right. If the police ask you for a receipt, id, license etc you have to cooperate. He didn't ask to search her personal belongings, her faking receipt he asked for.
You are enabling this behavior. It's not your right to deny, it's your duty to cooperate. You have it all wrong dear. Democracy comes with responsibilities not anarchy.
@@vlimavlima44 yeah you’re right. I got in my feelings because I’ve been accused of doing something I didn’t do & the police got involved. There’s no repercussions for people making frivolous accusations
The absolute division in these comments really shows where were at as a society.
We can't even agree how laws should be enforced or how rights should be protected.
Maybe they should be enforced with fact and not claim. But you are Americans and ignorant
Justice is not made by the people, for the people. That's why they always say get a lawyer.
NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO STEAL! Why the situation worse than what it already is! I'm glad she didn't win her lawsuit! She provoked this reaction with her, "I can do what I want" ATTITUDE!
@@michaelorosco1436 SHE DIDN'T STEAL!!!
@@michaelorosco1436 nobody stole anything.
i love how she's willing to go inside and look at cameras to prove her 'innocence' but wont just show him the receipt IN HER HAND lol
Why should she make his crime against her easier? HE has the burden of proof, not her.
Why should we have to prove our innocence when men died in wars, real violent wars with real deaths and real blood shed to ensure our rights to be innocent until proven guilty? It may seem trivial to certain minded people currently until it starts to infringe on their rights. Everything starts small then grows out of hand. One tiny right at a time will be taken until we have none left.
It literally says she purchased the goods appropriately. This was that store profiling her.
@@bear3663 Stop lying. "The burden of proof" is for the courtroom, not for a lawful stop.
@@mistyevans8160 Stop lying about the law. "Innocent until proven guilty" is for the courtroom, not for a lawful police stop. Your drama queen act does not make your lies any truer.
Had this happen to me once when walmart thought i stole something, all i did was stay calm and showed them the recipt and went on with my day...
Literally🤦♂️ 80% of these videos are people not following basic orders from an officer where quick compliance would have them going on with the rest of their day
That’s it. Show the receipt.
So if they would have asked you to spread your cheeks to show you are not hiding anything would you have complied? 🤔
Porque a los weros nunca les piden el recibo? Y solo a ti y la mujer afroamericana si.Eso se llama racismo pendejo!
@@mannnews yes
She was so weird. She didn’t steal, she just wanted to act ignorant.
The cop was the one committing a crime. Now Publix has to pay her for their security officer's actions.
@@bear3663No they don’t. There may be a store policy not to engage, but security officers have an inherent right to stop someone and detain them if they believe they have shoplifted.
@@dessiehenderson3328 The issue is that there wasn't reason suspicion of a crime. Publix settled outside of court.
@@bear3663where did you get information? The case was dismissed.
@@captainkev10 My information is from the court documents. The reason why the case was dismissed was because they had settled amicably out of court. She had filed a stipulated motion to dismiss, which is why the case was dismissed.
Much respect to the officer. He did everything he could to work with the woman… She did it to herself… 👍🏾!
Exactly. The officer did what he was called to do. How else would he have handled the situation? Everyone is saying it was an unlawful stop, but if the store called him, he needs to look into it. How else besides asking for the receipt? Is she really $50,000 richer now over this? if she is, then she knew exactly what she was doing.
He looked like he was struggling. Seems a bit pathetic she got out of the car . I didnt think there was any need to tazer her. So yeah I disagree
@@moongoddess8568 She isn't $50,000 richer. Her case was thrown out of court.
The officer tried to work with her. She was looking for a fight. All she had to do was answer his questions it all would have been over
@@michaelwillis9449 thank you! Attitude from the beginning.
For those who are curious, she was charged with resisting without violence and spent 24 hours in jail before all charges were dropped. She did file a $50,000 lawsuit against Publix, but it was later dismissed
Officer was within his rights
@@stevesandwichproductions1043 You Prat. She didn't steal. She paid for the stuff. I'm guessing you've never been accused of stuff you never done.
@@1flinns why she didn't show him the receipt then?
@ Mr. Brags
Thanks for the continuum, 'cause I'm sure there are lots who wantedto know the outcome of this scenario.
@@thefather5765 You dont have to prove your innocence or help them investigate. The police had zero evidence to escalate that to the point of force used.
She handled that tasing like it’s been done before.
She handled it like a boss
She did have considerable padding.
She may have gotten tazed a number of times in the past, and had developed an immunity of sorts, to being tazed.
Bulls×××!!
On my mama and pappy 😂
Note to self: clapping your hands to emphasize your point will not endear you to the cop who is questioning you.
It doesn't need to. The officer was committing crimes against this woman. His personal opinion of her doesn't matter, only the legal one does and he had no lawful reason to detain her in the first place.
@@bear3663 she was accused of a crime and was under investigation. absolutely that cop had a right to stop her and ID her
@@Suzi.68 That's not really accurate though. No one stated that she stole anything. They didn't watch as she checked out, that's not a crime on her part, nor is it reasonable suspicion of one. They're just mad that she didn't show a receipt after they failed to watch her checkout. Perhaps they should pay more attention in the future.
All In front of her kids. My heart breaks for the kids
She dinna do dat👏🙄🙄
It’s common in da hood
unfortunately prolly nuttin new
@@Profesah_411 It's common in the trailer park too lol
She be trynna teeching her kids how 2 deal with da Paul is and geet away with it. Not diz time itch.
She wanted this to happen. Plus she did it in front of her kids! How sad! I feel so sorry for our men and women in the blue who has to put up with this crap from ppl
What about the kids?😅
@@Bodaduchee Exactly lmao, There will always be 2 types of people in this world, The ones with a brain and the ones without
I can tell he didn't want to taser her
@@blueforest4589 She doesnt have a right to not provide proof of purchase. How is that her right?
@@blueforest4589 Except for the fact that the accusers were the store employees and she was still in the parking lot which is the stores property. If she was accused and on the property she DID have to show proof of purchase. They arent just gonna let someone accused of stealing who was on the property items were stolen from walk free. On private property all you need to be accused of stealing is word from the store manager, failure to comply with proof of purchase or waiting until the store can provide proof you didnt purchase the items is grounds for detainment until said proof is provided. She then resisted arrest which, no matter the circumstances, is illegal.
The Policeman was incredibly patient.
Ummm you meant incredibly forceful. Call the supervisor means call the supervisor. Not play judge and jury. Then tell bystanders to leave and get away and not record? Where is the patience
@@billreamer2524 Officer was in the right, people crowding around just makes the scene worse, he was trying to defuse the situation and this woman is obviously looking for attention/victim status.
@Aron Gladden I don't think so. if she was innocent, it just simple show him what he asked or bank statement. that's it.
@Aron Gladden yeah… because innocent people refuse to show proof of their innocence 😂
You are absolutely insane!
@Aron Gladdenyou a 🤡
So glad he called her out… “I’m gonna go to NAACP” his response “ that’s why you did what you did”
She did nothing unlawful, unlike this officer. Now she gets paid.
@@bear3663Incorrect. Lawsuit DISMISSED.
@@chrisx2k6 She motioned to the court to have it dismissed with prejudice after she got paid by Publix.
@@bear3663 ahhhhh see this is the truth ty for explaining
@@bear3663lies
I was accused of walking out on a tab at IHOP. The manager told cops inside of IHOP that me and three friends skipped out without paying. The cops ran outside and detained us very aggressively. The waitress came out screaming at the cops telling them that she told us to leave payment on the table. We also tipped very generously. After all of that the manager was fired I was given a $100 dollar voucher. The police department pulled me over 3 days later and apologized to me face to face.
When did this happen?
You live in a wild country. In Russia, in this case, they would not aggressively detain you. They would just talk to you if you didn't pay. If you refuse to pay, you will be taken to the police to issue you a fine. Nobody would draw a gun. He would have been in a closed holster. In Russia, police officers kill about 10 people a year during arrest. Most of these killings take place in the Caucasus. There are terrorists there, it is difficult to negotiate with them.
They only come when called. Manager started the whole thing, by your version. Good they apologized.
What?! No complmentry tazering?
@@shaniraymer2801 Roswell NM around 2009.
Why didn't she prove herself as being honest? Why would she put herself and those children through all this turmoil? Plain ridiculous.
Because she was a liar she stole whatever they said she stole
Because she's a thief and does this all the time! Cannot understand the mentality of these people! Shameless!
@@mariaparker7545 read the bio. they found the receipt and was proven that she didnt steal smh people dont know how to read
@@intuitivefire Do you people not read descriptions before jumping to conclusions? Description of vid: "Following her arrest, the officer found the receipt that proved she rightfully purchased the goods. The woman later sued Publix for $50,000 in damages"
@a-dallas-184 ask your mom if she read the manual before swallowing numerous sperm cells! Because if she did, I'm sure you wouldn't be here
This is why my brother gave up being a cop. There is just to much negativity being a police officer. He actually was an Minneapolis officer and left before the george Floyd arrest
Well they don't exactly get out on the streets to fight and bring down the most malicious criminals. The crimes they should be fighting and working to prevent or taper aren't being carried out as their top priority. It's more BS like this and traffic ticketing . The petty stuff . And for the record not all cops are pieces of crap but some are
I don't know his situation, but I believe he should have stayed on the force because he could have made a difference and touch some kids life in the area
what is "why my brother gave up..."? this video has nothing to do with "your brother". So dont assume we know why he "gave up".
@@JackPeloquin because of dealing with people acting like animals, like the woman in this video.
So it's the ppl fault? I'm jus ask'n and smdh..
God bless this Officer. Holy crap the patience on this guy. Ugh.
Yes, patiently violating her rights and attacking a paying customer.
It’s a business, all it take it’s them to say we don’t think she paid. The police then investigate… she obstructed and interfered with an investigation??? If you are innocent you do not act like this towards police officers who are simply trying to INVESTIGATE
Wrong. They have to provide proof. The audacity of you boot lickers is just crazy.
@@bear3663 No she's at fault for not showing a receipt. The store called the cops for possible theft so he has every right to investigate. But she's the one causing the mess by being difficult. Learn the law kiddo
@@FunGamerFever She isn't required to prove her innocence. The store didn't accuse her of stealing and their security officer didn't see her steal either.
Sometimes what we fear, ends up being the reality we create.
Basically Star Wars
Well said. This was certainly an example of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Truth
Wow that’s a great statement ! I’d love that on a T-shirt 😀
That's what ignorance and poor education leds to, to live off of assumptions and personal prejudices instead of reacting logically and accordingly.
When keeping it real goes wrong.
Yeah keeping it real ignorant
😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂
Best comment on the interwebs. 🤣
She sounds just like Maize a regular caller on the Jessie Lee Peterson show!
Das Amazin'
I👏 DON'T 👏STEAL👏
This had nothing to do with pride and principles, this was just a straight up attempt to get 15 minutes of fame and a golden lawsuit settlement… she thought she had a cash cow here, which the judge proved otherwise, and all of this foolishness right in front of her children, giving them a lifetime of traumatic memories from this nonsense! What a great mother…
She did receive a settlement.
So she had the receipt?
@@FREE-kh5vx Yes, she did have a receipt.
yes@@FREE-kh5vx
@@bear3663 The description says she didn't. Do you have another source for that?
We see this behavior all the time. This Officer gave this woman so many chances. All she had to do was hand over that slip of paper and the Officer would have let her go. She turned this whole thing into something it didn't need to be. Our actions have consequences. 😒
The officer was committing crimes against her. Now she is given a winning lawsuit.
@bear3663 , did she win it? I looked it up yesterday, it said the suit was dropped or something like that. What crimes do you think were committed against this woman?
@@kendrasowell2411 Yes, Publix paid her, which is why she motioned for the court to dismiss the case with prejudice.
He unlawfully detained her without reasonable suspicion of a crime. He assaulted her and committed false Imprisonment.
It was settled out of court, so legally it wouldn't Publix lost. Just like Walmart and the family of the shooting victims.
@@bear3663they paid her nothing “nope :). “The woman later sued Publix for $50,000 in damages. The case was dismissed with no settlement by a Duval County Florida judge in December 2021.” Publix paid nothing and she cannot file anymore lawsuits. Happy to educate you
I thought when a cop said you're going to jail and you say " no I'm not ". Then they had to automatically had to leave you alone.
america just isnt the same anymore 😞
So did she.
If she had clicked her ruby red slippers heels 3 times while chanting that makes cops go away and then criminals are free to commit crimes.
So what was the reason for her arrest ? She hurt his “wittle feelings”?
@@dougk5187 The cop was wrong Upon arrival, the woman told the officer that she had a receipt but refused to show him and accused employees of racially profiling her. After questioning the woman multiple times, the officer stated he was going to arrest and tase her, which he did shortly after. Following her arrest, the officer found the receipt that proved she rightfully purchased the goods. The woman later sued Publix for $50,000 in damages. The case was dismissed with prejudice by a Duval County Florida judge in December 2021.
This was easily avoidable too. Never let your pride get in the way. She left the cop no choice...
It's not about pride but u wouldn't understand
The cop had alternative choices. One choice, was to have Publix provide evidence of their allegation. The choice of the cop was to not expect the accused person to prove their innocense .. because in America we are presumed innocent until proven guilty. If Publix was refusing to allow the officers to review video inside the store, then it was in fact Publix who was not cooperating with the investigation, in which they bore the burden of providing evidence to support the allegation they were making. This woman actually went to a register with a cashier present , so another choice the officer could have made , was to go inside and speak with the cashier's. He and no other officer made what should have been the most reasonable choice ... INVESTIGATE. A mininmum wage worker making an accusation does not constitute probable cause. Without probable cause, there should be no expectation of an officer to perform a search of person or their vehicle without their consent. That is another right afforded to us , as American citizens. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits searches of persons and their properties without a warrant executed by a judge, the motor vehicle exception still demands probable cause exist for the search to be considered LEGAL. This woman stood on her rights, right's this officer was very well aware of as he entered into this engagement. He understood the limitations the law provided him , and CHOSE to exceed those limitations. Ultimately she was innocent, and acted within reason to her rights as an American.
They cut half of the video
They accused her of stealing and the lady really didn’t she asked to go see the camera he didn’t want to bc they had no proof
Wow, what a boot licker
Clapping hands ALWAYS works!!! Proof of innocence undisputed!
Lmfao
Right 🤣😂🤣😂
Always satisfying seing entitled bitchez getting pwned
clapping hands = seal, ARF ARF ARF ARF ARF! because she stole the "T" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@hardkore360 Niiice 😂
What a disgrace. If you did not steal show your receipt and be on your way.
She literally says "I'm not showing you the receipt because I don't got a re- I mean, ummm... " lol
OOOPS!! 🤭
Obviously you didn’t read the description where it says all charges were dropped because she bought and had a receipt. She is also suing Publix for $50,000. So shut it bozo.
@@aljigga Obviously you didn't read my subsequent comment and response defending her for having the receipt. Still doesn't change the fact she refused to show it. This is how things escalate. Bozo!
@@rajakandabowla6194 Maybe spend a few decades of your life being followed around in stores, accused stealing and generally treated like a suspect and then get back to me on how you'd react.
Good thing you said "literally". I 'd hate for anyone to think you were speaking rhetorically. Or hyperbolically. Or ironically. Thank you for making that distinction.
“Hey there ma’am, some workers in the store didn’t see you pay. Can I see your receipt?”
“Sure, I’ve got it right here.”
“Thanks, you have a good day now”.
She chose getting tased and spending the night in jail over this interaction.
This interaction never should have happened in the first place.
She paid for her items and there was no reasonable suspicion to detain her.
She went to jail because of the officer's criminal actions.
Lmao exactly
Just show your receipt. It’s not hard! SMH
@@Galbator-hz5sz An officer can't detain on mere suspicion, but it has to be based on facts giving reasonable suspicion of a crime. Refusing to show a receipt isn't reasonable suspicion. Watching someone pick up items and not pay at checkout would be reasonable suspicion.
@@bear3663 the employees told him she didn't pay that's enough to be detained, not arrested. On the other side she could have remained silent and not showed him anything but she didn't follow the lawful order out of the car.
This was one of the most frustrating things I've ever seen
She should've showed the receipt, he was trying to do his job, don't make it hard. He was being nice, she was being aggressive
I’m with you!!
@@brad4187 she didn't have to show him anything. he needed to investigate. She did offer to go back inside with the officer!
@@brad4187 Burden of proof is on the accusers.. Not the other way around. Why did you steal my car? Should you know be investigated? How do you prove you didn't steal it?
@@mrkennyfernand She sued and she lost her case.
She did say she “got no receipt” then quickly pivoted.
She didn't say that.
I heard that too 🤣🤣🤣
My god how do people live life being like this 😳
Same way u live life wondering.😄
she was well within her rights.....which the police officer was trampling on
That’s not a human being.
Because of a government that panders to them, pays for them, and keeps them in perpetual state of victimhood.
@@csmidt2885 not really she was suspected of a crime and refused to id. That’s not well within your rights…
My gym is in the same shopping center. It's the only Publix I've ever been to that has a police officer parked in front and standing in the lobby from open to close 7 days a week. The nearby Walmart has such massive shoplifting problems, they also have security in the parking lot and the lobby at all times. It's also the only Walmart left that doesn't have ANY self-checkouts. I used to joke with my friends that I moved to a side of town that you need a bullet proof vest to do your errands, and it's not because of the cops. I've had to duck and run for cover in our Walmart a few times over the years due to gang activity, as well as loss prevention tackling people trying to run out after getting caught shoplifting.
Hmmmm I wonder why?
Maybe the store is losing $10000's of dollars due to theft?
That's a very good reason 👍
What's the address of this Publix?
Well they need better security don't harass and assume with all your customers
Why is it that people of a certain group on national news are disproportionately robbing, stealing, and destroying property and expect to be treated like upstanding, law abiding citizens?
Must be Atlanta on Martin Luther King Dr😭
"this store thinks you stole something"
"here's my receipt"
"ok thank you have a nice day"
how hard is that 🤦🏼♀️
exactly what im saying.
"this store thinks you stole something"
"where is the evidence?"
How hard is that?
Yeah we should all have to prove were innocent without evidence of actually being guilty. Your a dingbat.
The store made that claim. Nobody else did. I believe, and I don't know the full story and what that officer had done prior to the encounter, they should have asked for some semblance of evidence before making that probable cause.
Would it be easier to show receipt? Yes maybe so, but the accuser should be providing the evidence. It's innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent... if she didn't steal anything, she shouldn't have to prove it to someone who is falsely accusing her...
"I didn't steal nothin" is the same as admitting guilt.
She didn't steal.
If she stole then there would have been a theft charge too.
Stale.
Megan Markel spotted!
My dad always used to say "if you're in the right, keep your double negatives to yourself"
When will people learn that when a cop says "you're going to jail" he's not asking for your opinion, it means you're going to jail?
NO you are innocent till proven guilty .. its America ... He had no prove she stole, no probable cause WHAT SO EVER >
Since when does cooperating mean giving up your rights?
@@Halfhounded probable cause Not there .. at this point its a hearsay, No need for cooperation
Did the cop get fired for tasing the lady?
people who are guilty. She may have gone to jail but she was guilty of nothing when the police enocuntered her. She had stolen NOTHING. She acted irrationally but she did not attempt to harm the arresting officer. She was falsely accused and many would act irrationally at that point.
Law Enforcement is absolutely necessary for a Society to exist.
Law Enforcement needs to be uprooted, demolished and replaced with something more just and equitable. Law Enforcement are modern day slave catchers and slave patrol.
Hahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahha
Yep California defunded next you know riots stealing and fires
What Law he was enforcing? Receipt Law 😂
Once you let the American government take care of your failures… welcome to N. Korea.
I though she took that taser pretty good to be honest. LOL
It had to make it thru some large cans!
Its probably happened multiple times 😂
Haha, yeah these Terminatrixs' are starting to become highly resistant to conventional tasers and stun guns, they need to increase the voltage or wattage or whatever is holding the electrical charge. In most cases people tased immediately lock up and fall, she was actually resisting the charge and seemed to still have some fight in her after her collapse to the ground, though the taser did it's job, I'd say it was just barely effective.
@@okaysingtome7495 It sounds like you are advocating death to non-violent but unpleasant people
I hoppe all of you got a taste one day LOL
She's such a reasonable woman.
Super classy. I wish she was my neighbor
"Well I didn't believe her at first but then she started clapping with every word and that convinced me."
Those claps be bad, not sure if the tasing was in order tho
😂
Too funny 🤣🤣🤣
She needed tazing. I just knew he was going to be wrong but nope, she was begging to go to jail.
@Fullashit Ministries
Too funny 🤣🤣🤣
This happened to me before. I showed the officer my receipt, he apologized and I went on with my day. 1 minute inconvenience turned into jail time and traumatization of a kid..grade A parent right here.
Ohhhhh cool...... You are a sheep!!!!
Another 1 🙄🙄
That turned in to a pay day right there
@@timothyaycock The case was dismissed with prejudice by a Duval County Florida judge in December 2021.
@@nortonyatzee7254 And Publix paid her $50K
he is begging her .. he's trying to stop it from escalating. I show my receipt every time I leave Costco. I am not offended. Woman has chip on her shoulder.
When you deal with someone like this, this is the minority of incidents that make the news and probably couldn't have been done any better.
I bet you haven't been falsely accused and thought it was because of your skin colour.
1. HE ESCALATED
2. IS THIS AMERICA. Is this a country where you're innocent until proven guilty or you're guilty until you prove your innocence?
@@paulrprichard well your theory would be wrong if the store employee had the same skin color.
@@paulrprichard F U , N.
Grandpa had a saying - Those who won't listen must feel❗🤔
My mother was such a classy lady. Im so happy for having my mother.
What??? she's my mother as well!! How you doing my Sister.
@@stephenhumphrey7935 is she your mother
Classy, our mother was
Amen I can honestly say that my mother would have behaved like a lady and for that matter it was police officers who saved her life and my fathers. Great job officer.
man mines was one of a kind
There is a difference between remaining silent and being a fool. Never silent, just a fool.
Better to remain silent and thought of a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt...
Some people are just delusional.
When they get shrill and hysterical you know they’re guilty
@Gook King who are you people talking about
For $50,000 tase me 10 times. We the people have no obligation to aid in an investigation. Our rights are eroding by the day because of sheep like you just going along to get along. Hopefully she sues the cop and his agency for violating her civil rights. Hope this officer has long career as a dog catcher. Thats about the ceiling for his investigation skills. Someone who knows their rights and stands up for them sir is no fool. I call them Patriots. If you enjoy freedom?
No wonder cops are retiring early, and there are shortages of new applicants.
Oh, but here are plenty of minorities applying. That was the whole plan all along.
Right. Because so many make bad choices
@@russ7414 you're correct. I work with cops and attorneys everyday in local govt. Most just do their job. Others don't know how to do their jobs and are low IQ. Most cops aren't super intelligent actually
@@russ7414 no pal lol. Most AREN'T that intelligent
@Brandon X that's because their chief is probably dirty. With cops it starts at the top
How is it with some people that they always yell the loudest when they're in the wrong?
The loudest was the victim who was upset that the officer was committing crimes against her. At least she gets paid.
She’s setting a bad example for her child that’s in the backseat, over something as simple as refusing to show the officer her receipt.
As the old adage goes, "The fruit doesn't fall far from the tree." So, those kids may end up being as combative as her, or worse.
Worse there not her kids and she teaches these lessons too them...also leaves her sisters kids kids in the vehicle while she steals she has no receipt if so why not take the kids in why not show it she has none
Generational ignorance. Bring on da reparations!
Too right.
@@blueforest4589 won’t you just go away? You are here to fight anyone whose opinion does not align with yours. That makes you a bully.
I m blk and this is crazy. Just show your receipt. You have kids watching just show the receipt. This is uncalled for.
We are not always right. Period.
Seriously, those poor kids. No child needs that kind of trauma over some misplaced sense of pride or whatever it was making her choose the taser and jail over nothing.
How does the story end?
Amen
@@chasesymonds4804 whatever, I'm proud of this lady. This cop should be arrested and fired.
Exactly
This is why everytime I buy something I ask for a receipt.
You could also just be polite when questioned. That works too.
Or the police officer could just do his job and the store could not just assume that's why I always leave my receipt behind
Or the police officer could just do his job and the store could not just assume that's why I always leave my receipt behind
@@jeremyhodges7956 She had her receipt and refused to show it. 🤔 Officer was doing his job and deserves an apology from this woman. She wanted this hassle.
@@jeremyhodges7956 WTF ARE YOU SAYING, YOU MUST BE A VERY LOW IQ PERSON
Okay, I completely understand what it feels like to be accused of something you didn’t do. It’s happened to me. However, when you have evidence or proof of something, YOU hold the power because you just pull out the receipt, say absolutely nothing and go on your merry way. These situations where you’re arguing, wasting time, getting angry, frustrated etc. It just shows the other person that they’re getting under your skin. I’ve been pulled over twice in my life by police. One time for speeding as I was on the way to the hospital to see my dad who’d been taken I’ll. I quietly got in their car, explained things and I was asked to attend a speed awareness course that’s all. The second time, I had no MOT because it slipped my mind after the death of my sister. Again, I explained the circumstances and they let me go. Not saying all police and civilian interactions go well but in this case, just show the receipt and then make your complaint afterwards.
Fascinating
What is an MOT? I've never heard of that before. I'm sorry to hear about your sister, but I'm glad they showed you kindness in that situation.
There is no requirement to prove your own innocence . Either the cop has evidence and probable cause enough to make an arrest or he does not. You are in no way legally responsible to help with the cop's investigation.
Legally she is not required. Because of people continually and willingly giving up their rights now police think that they can do this. Bravo!!
Not everyone thinks a total compliance is the way to go
I don’t understand why she doesn’t just show her receipt. Oh my gosh. This cop is so amazing. He was crazy calm.
Crazy calm as he unlawfully detains, unlawfully threatens, attacks and unlawfully arrests a paying customer.
@@bear3663 he had reasonable suspicion of theft.
@@coltonrusso3011 No, he did not. Her not showing a receipt is not reasonable suspicion.
@@coltonrusso3011 An employee not watching her go through the checkout is not reasonable suspicion of a crime. If they saw her stealing, THEN that would be reasonable suspicion. If they saw her pick up items from the shelf and walk out of the store, THAT would be reasonable suspicion of a crime. Her paying with a cashier, and there being an employee who didn't watch her do so, that's not her fault and is not evidence of a crime. They didn't call 911, the officer was working as security for Publix.
Ever heard of not doing something on principle?
I've been a police officer in a major metropolitan police department for 23 years now. I have experience. I am now going to tell you how the law works in this instance. You can agree or disagree, but the law is the law. Any crime that is categorized as a misdemeanor and was NOT committed in the presence of an officer (in other words the officer did not witness the crime), that crime needs to have a victim who wants to press charges. In that instance, the officer is basically facilitating a citizen's arrest on behalf of that victim. That is exactly what is occurring in this video. The officer is conducting an investigation into a possible crime, in which the victim (the store with the employee acting on behalf of the store) wants to place the individual under arrest for the theft they believe she committed. An officer faced with this situation basically has three options;
Option #1- Investigate to find proof of guilt (or innocence).
Option #2- Don't investigate and cite and release or arrest solely based on the statement of the victim (in that case, the victim/store assume all legal responsibilities).
Option #3- The victim decides they want nothing done and the officer let's the person go, whether they are guilty or not (the option all cops prefer)
In this video, the officer was doing his best to achieve the #1 option and help the woman prove her innocence. The officer is wrong in that the woman's decision to not show a receipt is absolutely her right. Her decision to not identify herself is also her right. But those decisions leave the officer with no choice but to go with option #2 (keeping in mind that the victim is wanting to press charges). In this case, the officer is acting on behalf of the victim and facilitating THEIR arrest. Once the officer has told you that you are under arrest (which this officer did a multiple of times), it is of course still your legal right to not say anything or hand over the receipt, but you certainly do not have the right to physically resist the officer, or not comply with his/her verbal commands (you actually never have that right, which I can explain further if someone wants). The officer has not only the legal right to take you into custody, but a duty to do so on behalf of the victim who is requesting the arrest/cite. Now, on top of the theft charge, you will receive an additional misdemeanor charge of resisting an officer. If the officer gets injured during the resisting, it becomes a felony resisting charge.
Now to the tasing part..........While I would not have tased this woman, that doesn't mean the officer was not lawful in doing so. In order to tase someone, an officer must have a present threat of physical danger. In other words, you can't tase someone who is running away from you or someone who is just verbally uncooperative. But someone who is squaring up with you like a boxer or wrestler, or in this case, someone who has already proven they are going to fight you if you go hands on (like this lady did at 3:48), is able to be legally tased. Again, while I would not have tased this woman, she was still legally "taserable". I know getting tased looks bad, but let's not forget that she put herself AND THOSE KIDS in that situation.
Bottom line is officer was 100% legal in what he did. Could he have handled it different and not tased her? Sure...But then the officer is actually going hands on and fighting with her. I guess you have to "pick your poison".
I hope this helps people understand from an officer/legal point of view. I welcome all questions, but please don't come at me with rude comments. thnx
So what about when the woman offers to go to the store to confirm she paid and the officer says no? He does not allow her to prove her innocence the way she wanted. He wanted done his way imo and he infact did taser an innocent person.
Yeah but if the officer presented that he wants to prove she is innocent maybe she would react differently...
Finally an intelligent cop who understands that law. Her mistake was resisting. I would have remained silent or told cop if I don't show you the receipt am I under threat of arrest? If he says yes, I would compy under threat of arrest and take it up with a lawyer. Interesting how many make false reports, 911 calls and cops never harass or arrest them. When will they arrest those who make false reports, complaints or 911 calls?
He had no lawful commands to issue. None. Therefore he had no right to use force. She does not have to comply with unlawful commands. He was investigating an alleged crime and she’s not required to aid in that investigation. There was no legal grounds for him to issue any commands until he had PC. This encounter was consensual because he was investigating hearsay. She did not have to comply. He just cost the city a couple hundred grand, and I’m sure Publix will get sued as well.
😩 I love how the cop made sure he turned off the camera right at the end because he knew the woman was right the whole time and he didnt want you to see him asking that guy if there was anyway to view the camera footage 😭 thats what he started saying it right before he turned it off
She could have easily just showed receipt. She knew what she was doing!
She could have. He could have chosen not to attack paying customers.
@@bear3663🤡
Exactly. Years ago I was leaving a store and lost prevention came out and asked me for my receipt. I gave it to them and went on my way. I did not get hysterical.
@@ginajoseph8776 💯
She is just like a child. I don’t know how these police officers deal with the scum of the Earth every day like this.
I hate scummy people who pay for things.
@@lizd2943 I hate people
Age como mulher de rua, não como criança.
@@lizd2943 Hi there, looter.
Hi there, insurance salesman.@@Cavpal
Imagine being told what’s gonna happen to you and it does and u act surprised 🤦♂️
Imagine been beaten by a terrorist who should have been acting as a cop, I didn't see any evidence of a crime apart from hearsay, the people who accused this woman and the terrorist should now be beaten, eye for and eye
“Po Po done tased me!”
@@trvman1 do you think the burden on proof should be on the individual? You would be perfectly fine living in a police state in which cops have the authority to require you to present whatever papers they want you to present whenever they want it, without a reasonable suspicion or probable cause? Case law has held that witness testimony isn’t grounds for a detainment, and this video exemplifies why perfectly. Humans are unreliable, and often get things wrong or mistaken things to be something they’re not. You know, if tomorrow everyone just gave in to liberals and started to stop fighting gun restrictions then we’d just lose those rights….. The moment you stop using your God given rights is the moment you lose them. Yeah you could give them up and just show the receipt, but why? We are not second class citizens to LEOs, we have rights that are supposed to protect us from these things.
That's fine. If you ever get pulled over and the police ask you to get out of the car, be sure to stay in your car. Then if they ask you to put your hands out the window, be sure not too. If they just ask to see your license and insurance, be sure to refuse to do that. Then if they approach your car, be sure to drive away because you feared for you life with the police just asking you to do some SIMPLE thing(s). Then be SURE to say you didn't do anything wrong as the judge watches the video. :) I would LOVE to see what you do when you go out of a Walmart and they ask to see your receipt. I would bet you would not show it, cause a scene and most likely get arrested and then sue WalMart and the police. Not that you would win, but I am sure you would not mind eating the lawyers fees to prove your point.
@@trvman1 You ignored everything I said and responded with whataboutism 😂 You are the embodiment of ignorance. You may be fine with giving up your freedom to politicians and police but the majority of this country is not. If a cop came knocking on your front door today, and told you they were searching your house because your neighbor made up whatever reason he wanted, I’m sure you’d let them in and do a full search eh? Without a reasonable suspicion or probable cause. That’s simply because you are a follower, a sheep, that will be herded wherever your masters want you to go. Why? Most likely due to your genetics and child rearing. Poor unfortunate you.
I don't think I would've wanted the children to see all of this so I probably would've just showed a receipt!
Exactly
@@deidremontrose4379 Read top part - officer found receipt
@@CMD1984 She did
What receipt
Teaching your kids to have attitude
She’s not thinking probably the Sargent can’t save you
A reasonable supervisor should be able to help her. She committed no crime, unlike the officer.
@@bear3663 she stole from the store
@@laurenbaynes No, she paid for her items.
I went to Walmart yesterday and bought maybe 10 grocery items. I never bag my items. As I was leaving the greeter asked me for my receipt for the first time in many years. Because I have not stolen anything since I was 6 years old, I was briefly offended, but showed it to him.
I asked him if he was asking everyone for receipts. He stalled but then told me it was because I had not bagged my items. Like I said, I never do and never get stopped.
But, I am not going to make a scene or harass some older guy who has to check people.
You’re actually under 0 obligation to show the Wal-mart greeter your receipt since you did not agree to that prior to entering the store. Only places like Sams club, Costco, etc are allowed to do so because you agree to it in order to be a member. However, if a cop walks up to you and asks to see the receipt because there is suspicion of you not paying for an item, you have to provide it because theft is a crime. Now if she were just minding her own business and wasn’t suspected of theft, she wouldn’t have to provide anything to the cop.
@@GraV21 she was minding her own business. Publix didn't accuse her of stealing anything and the cop said he didn't know if she stole anything or not. If he was so unsure if a crime had been committed why did he escalate it to physical violence?
@@evorider3689 you think not showing a receipt is escalating the situation to be tased? The cop had a choice and he tased her for not showing him a receipt. She offered to go back in the store but he refused, that is being uncooperative.
@@evorider3689 you can disobey orders from police .She was under no obligation to give him the receipt.
@@nikkimcdonald4562 he said that’s because he doesn’t have access to the cameras. The theft prevention team are the ones who likely notified the cops. All she had to do was pull out the receipt and prove everyone wrong and file a complaint/get a lawyer afterwards. Instead, she would rather fight and argue with the cop not caring at all for the kids in her custody. This is never okay. He wasn’t being disrespectful whatsoever. Publix def were accusing her, that’s why what looked like the two store managers were outside. The store has a right to protect its property especially if they never see you checkout. That’s why she lost her lawsuit.
I had what should have been, a confrontation with a fast food employee, while my 12 year old nephew was in the passenger seat. I look back on that very valuable lesson I taught him: negotiate, deescalate situations. The person in the drive-thru was rude at first and then I was polite in return- I didn't blow up things because he didn't have what I initially wanted. Instead,I thanked him and the establishment for what they were able to give us. We ended up getting a good discount. My nephew was impressed and I still remember his words: you didn't make a big deal, talked to him the right way - mom would have made the biggest scene. Be careful how you conduct yourself in front of the children in your life.
110%!!!!
That’s fast food. I’ll teach my kids to stand for their rights and not give them up. To not cower to public servants who wish to violate my constitutional rights. I wore this country’s uniform to defend my rights and you better believe I won’t be violated
@@mathewserrano2262 Well, good for you Rambo. You’re going to be fighting the windmill all your life and you’re carrying on the legacy of bull headed opposition toward any kind of authority to your son so he can be like minded, assuring a life of confrontation. BTW, did you have that same attitude toward those placed in authority in the military? You know, those officers who admitted you had all the rights and then apologized to you for “defending your rights”? Yea, right.
@@dynodon331 the military is not a democracy. The constitution doesn’t apply the same. I’d be proud if my son didn’t lay down like a coward. Stand for something or live on your knees
@@mathewserrano2262 Respect!
Cop: "Your going to jail"
Lady: "No I'm not"
Cop: "Ok, have a nice day."
🤣
🤣😂
SURE HAVE A NICE DAY.
😂
Premises have cctv and full of guards, they have to issue evedence first to accused someone of stealing. They can not forced someone to show their proof of not stealing whey they're have no evidence
Tasing should be standard operating procedure.
Yep. She was given so many chances to comply and refused. She was rightfully tazed
Imagine having to deal with that every day, could not pay me enough.
@@hayloft3834 Those "assumptions" could've been proven wrong much quicker if that woman cooperated.
@@secondary5913 1) She can refuse to give id because he is questioning her about a misdemeanor (5th amendment). 2) she does not need to show a receipt, there is zero legal standing for her to have to provide one. 3) he saw kids in the backseat and claimed she left them in the car, but he is assuming that, he cannot prove it. 4) he admitted he did not see any video. Finally, there is no state where a police officer can make an arrest for a misdemeanor they did not witness, with a few exceptions. Theft is not one of those misdemeanor exceptions. There is a reason the charges got dismissed. This was a bad arrest.
@@secondary5913 Do you show receipt or do you earn 50K because officer did everything wrong.
Innocent till proven guilty not guilty till proven innocent.
I know exactly what you mean, Martin. Imagine having to deal with being racially profiled every day. You could not pay me enough to have dark skin in this country.
@@Phisherman86
Like ya mammie
There is just something disturbing about someone who yells at you, but won't look at you.
And slaps her hands together like a monkey.
@@schrisdellopoulos9244 okay?
@@blueforest4589 what did you see against the law? Should probably brush off those law books and skim over them
@@blueforest4589 Entire lawsuit dismissed in court WITH prejudice.
Goes to show you don't know anything.
@@blueforest4589 Yeah. It's called "guilt".
This officer was SO incredibly kind, sweet, compassionate. He did not want any of this to happen
Um in most states need evidence before they approach a shopper ! This is a massive lawsuit against the police and the store.
This is unlawful detainment. This woman was accosted by a police officer without probable cause or reason, merely suspicion. Sickening.
Tasing is compassionate? Terrifying children is compassionate? Caling a citizen a b----h is compassionate? Not on my planet.
He tased an in unarmed woman. He then threatened people recording to go away. And the store never seen her steal.
@@deadeyetopher8621you would think so but her civil case was already dismissed with prejudice which means she can’t bring the suit.
I'm so sick of these people lying. That she did not do it. This is so troubling to see. Her poor children. Poor excuse of a parent.
She should be charged with child abuse
Cop: Show me your receipt
Me: Here you go officer
Cop: Have a nice day
Lol
Hello?!! This was absolutely ridiculous.
You don't like your rights?
Shows ur protected ignorance!
That’s not how it works.
If I was in that situation, I'd show a receipt and ask for an apology. Not traumatize poor kids for pride.
no i would educate them all on the law
She had no obligation to do so and the officer had no legal standing to arrest her since burden of proof is on the accusing party. She was protected by the 4th amendment from unreasonable searches or seizures. Someone simply saying they believed she stole something did not merit the officers actions. An officer educated on law they are supposed to enforce would have known this but then again there is an IQ cap as to how smart you can be to be police.
Because your weak
@@lGuileWilliamsl or you can just show your receipt simple as that no need to act like a victim o wait she's blck they love using their victim card.
Notice how the cop said they seen her not pay, then later told the guy he didn’t see her. So what are we learning here?
Poor kids..my heart breaks for them. As a mom, I would NEVER put on a show like this, especially if my kids were present. That stuff stays with kids..forever.
"Poor kids.." Agreed. Publix's security should never have commit crimes against this lady in front of these kids.
She settled outside of court. Meaning: that she was not in the wrong and they were. How could she have known she was going to be followed and detained unlawfully? I respect our officers, but they need to fully know what laws they are trying to enforce. And not try to strip our rights. Those were not her children, but she showed them how to stand up for their rights. The officer was in the wrong. So the lawsuit she settled for an undisclosed amount says. And before a reply says it was publix, yes indeed. This particular officer was working for publix that day.
Absolutely....
blame publix for subjecting those kids to discrimination from such a young age
@@mistyevans8160 glad he tased her lol
She says she doesn't steal but she sure lies
She didn't steal.
Imagine, as a parent, putting your ego above your children and choosing to make them watch something that will probably be engraved in their minds forever. That short but very important experience will have a huge impact on them.
It is imperative that our children see and understand abusive government.
@@viralsheddingzombie5324 I can say with 100% confidence and years of experience, this is exactly how EVERY accused shoplifter acts. They instantly go full batshit crazy to make as big of a scene as possible in hopes you let them go.
Between showing the officer the receipt and getting tasered I would have easily chosen the first option 🤔😮 I completely understand the woman sentimient and frustration but one has to choose their battles 🤷🏻♀️
As a cop is it so hard to go in the store with her as she asked to check the cameras and yes they can get access to the cameras if they simply asked
Now i know she was wrong to resist after he said she was under arrest but why oh why wont they simply do their job and do their investigation 1st b4 escalating situations and customers dont have to show their receipts
Why didn't she give the receipt
He was soooo patient...I couldnt do that job. She acted like a kid.. A hugh thx for his duty
She acted like a true thief🤣🤣🤣
She shouldn't have to show a recie0t because some 16 year old says she stole
To me it is a decision of what will be less of an intrusion into my life. I can stand my ground and get into a conflict with an officer where I go to jail...or I can show the receipt. Maybe I have the right not to show it...but what action do I choose to end the situation with the least intrusion into my life...I show the receipt.
Your choice :) it's called freedom babby :)
nothing wrong with strechen them rights when you wana. nothing wrong with complying to get things over faster.
For all we know this poor lady keeps getting the stink eye from one person in that store and has complied in the past.
@@Zagroseckt If she didn't steal anything just show the freaking receipt. Now she has a car full of kids that are traumatized was it worth it I think not!
Stand ground and get paid later. The suit will settle for at least 700k to 300k within the yr. Kids see worse on Fortnite.😂😂😂😂 I can't get this lucky.
Because of complacent idiots like you, that's why this things happen. Everything is now whatever cops want to do rather the correct process for things and respecting rights
Well she got 50,000 dollars off of it so.. if I knew I’d get lots of money from being a victim of police brutality I’ll take the punishment
Lol! That little scream at 3:55 got me cracking up! 😂😂
Everybody knows that when you're innocent and can immediately prove it, the best course of action is to deny everything and make it appear as though you are 100% guilty!
Especially if you want to sue for any damages from the arrest instigated falsely.
seeming and are, are two very different things.
Everyone is innocent in America until you prove guilt
He needs to be fired and never be a cop nowhere cause hes an _ _ _ _ _
hmm, so an accusation and an assumption is all it takes to be required to prove your innocent? didn't this happen in the United States? (innocent until PROVEN guilty?) ps. not assisting a LEO with their investigation is not obstruction. while the LEO is at it mabey they should demand she show the title or a bill of sale for the vehicle she's driving. maybe a receipt for the clothes and shoes she's wearing too. or mabey go talk to the complainant? see if they can provide any evidence of her guilt? 🤔
COP: Hi ma'am, I was called here to investigate a shoplifting. Do you happen to have a receipt of your purchase?
WOMAM: Yes I do. Here you go.
COP: Thanks, Have a great day!
Your name would be Travis
Exactly !
Exactly that could have easily happened. But she opted for her kids go through her mother being arrested in front of their eyes.
needs to play the victim card!! lol
Papiere, bitte
Cop- "There is reason to believe that you were shoplifting. Can I see your receipt?"
Woman- "No, I'm not going to do that because that makes no sense at all."
CULTURE
Unfortunately he didn't gave her 10 warning sh0ts.
Yup this is how people with this attitude are raised. Always gotta make things difficult.
Then ppl wonder why each generation of kids grow up acting like this smh...
If he suspected of her a crime. Then do his job and investigate. Ask witnesses. If not. You have no proof. So you have to let her go. It's not the other way around for her to help with his investigation. Clearly he didn't do his job.
It’s disgusting to see this lady act like this - what a doof
"I don't steal!" I just permanently borrow things without paying.
She paid for her items.
My receipt? Sure, here you go.
Thanks mam. Have a good day
So simple, right?!
Rights were violated,I'm sure it's okay with you.
It wasn't Anna it was you officer all you
You made a mess officer
Exactly!
This woman was willing to walk back in the store and waste all that time going through security footage to prove that she didn't steal...but was unwilling to simply show a reciept to prove that she didn't steal and be on her way
And that’s how u secure the bag boys & girls
It is the principal of it all. She was in the right and the detainment was unlawful as well as the demand for her receipt.
The cop was willing to harass her instead of checking the camera footage this was all about him flexing his authority
Cause she a theif.
@@bear3663 no it wasn’t
"I guess you gave me what I wanted." is not something a victim says.
...and she STILL complained
You Guys Realize She Was Innocent And Actually Purchased Her Goods Right?
@@Andriggdy17 Yes, and? She could have simply showed the receipt and been on her way, but she wanted to escalate things into an arrest so she could pursue a lawsuit instead.
@@Andriggdy17 There's a reason that her suit was dismissed with prejudice. You just can't act like this in a civil society.
She was being sarcastic to his comment
She should have complied whether she stole or not! She had children in the car who are going to be forever traumatized by her are not caring enough about them!
All over a receipt and her not caring !!!
Yep, not complying is also why she lost her lawsuit. Her own fault this happened
Love when people walk up after the fact acting like they know the entire story.
Sounds like how the police do things.
Turns out they were RIGHT. She had a receipt but chose to assert her 4 th amendment rights
@@briancasey7693 still should've showed the receipt so she wouldn't have to go through that cause.
@@lucid523 She wanted to be the next "victim". They love looking for those chances.
The story is easy. Any American citizen is INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty....it's a recent phenomenon where the police like to think the opposite is true now...that you have to PROVE your Innocence or get arrested.
I must commend this cop for being polite respectful, soft-spoken and self-restraining, with this intransigent lady.
It's very simple! Just show your receipt to prove you paid for the product you have, from the shop. Profiled or not profiled, the law says you must do this, on demand by a competent authority. What's so difficult to show a receipt?
I can't find any law that says this...in fact most seem to put the burden of proof on the store....though profiling is most definetely illegal....
I liked how the cop was being polite, respectful, soft-spoken and self restraining, with this intransigent lady. the best part was when the cop was speaking in a soft spoken tone. soft spoken tone relaxes my anxiety.
It’s very difficult to show a receipt when you don’t have one.
@@alicekramden8640If she didn't have one, then a reason could be, because she actually did steal from the store.
I would have showed my receipt, especially with children in the car, and deal with the situation later, if I was racially profiled like she said. The children should not have seen this !
if anything they should have learned what, "stop/not resisting" was.
i would not have shown my receipt. if i did not steal no way im going to show it. only thing she did wrong was resist. if she didnt resist, and didnt steal, it would be a good law suit.
@@D1711-i1o Excellent point!
Yeah but, it would have been a lot easier if the police officer would have followed her advice and gone into the store and reviewed the video tape and questioned the witnesses like any other normal police officer!!!
No it’s good the kids saw it. It teaches them how adults should not act and the respect law enforcement deserves. Good job Law Enforcement. 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Let her sit in jail a few days and maybe she’ll wake up
As someone who had to check receipts at doors I can tell you for a fact people do this just to have a lawsuit in the end like this woman attempted.
Ding ding ding ding - bingo.
I believe it ..
How can that be she didn't steal anything so how could this be her plan
@@jeremyhodges7956
Well, I wouldn't go as far as saying she staged it from the start. But, I think it's fairly obvious that she was bothered by the fact that she was asked for a receipt, and then tried to escalate that into a lawsuit. There are clues all over the place. She slipped up and said she didn't have the receipt, when she actually did have it, and she stopped mid-sentence, as if she realized it was a bad idea to outright lie, and wanted to take her words back. She also repeatedly asked to be Tased... who would do that? And, despite how many times she was warned that she needs to provide identification (mainly in the longer version of this video, not this one that clips out the first half), she refused to provide ID. It's definitely as if she wanted to get herself Taser'd and arrested.
@@jeremyhodges7956 What they do is scan something and put it back in the cart like they didn't already scan it, then when they get ready to leave they put on an act like a typical shoplifter does and puts the item from the cart into the bag skipping the scanner. This is why they ask for reciepts and not just hold them in the security office waiting for police pickup.
It’s sad that nobody ever recognizes the children in these situations. Where are the adults?!
She got herself arrested that’s what happened
These children are being taught from over emotional adult children, they will become the same as the adults that teach them, it’s a vicious never ending cycle
@@pjp7259 it slowly ends as these children slowly realize (some don’t of course) that they’re parents are it good role models, they see the officer being nice and will never forget how both behaved, some people realize that and some don’t, it’s up to these children to wake up as they grow up and end the cycle edit: not good role models
Oh, I'm sure they'll be fine at home with dad....😂🤣
@@brianmoore6490 what dad
When she told them kids, "call y'all momma", she knew it was about to kick off. 🤣
💀those poor kids watching her auntie get tased🗿
Which may mean she put the kids in harm's way possibly, especially if it's not her kids. Just show the reciept and be done with it.
@@himarihina that wasn't her first rodeo!
God Bless the Blue. Its a good ole southern "ho down" out there.
lol you already know 😂 she was with the shids 🤣
Why do people resist ? Cuz they guilty
Actually she wasn't..She had a receipt
Oh my gosh… and to subject those children to ALL THAT cuz she wanted to act a fool 😖🤮
she gotten that $50,000 though by sueing the store lol.
She acted like that because she wants money.
@@gotti512 I mean who wouldn't knowing whats going todays world cause of gas going up food prices going up,This is why everyone is starting to do this.and especially when I whent to a store yesterday the eggs were almost $5.00 I almost cried. 😭
So many yellow bellied, un American cowards, willing to roll over and give their rights up to PUBLIC SERVANTS. What a joke that you’re willing to give up constitutional rights to dressed up clowns with a tin badge. The “Don’t tread on me” crowd? More like “let me roll over and step on me daddy, while I lick your boots” crowd. Sickening and un American. Founders and vets are rolling over in their graves
She won 50000 because they were wrong.