When Not Showing Your Receipt Goes HORRIBLY Wrong
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2022
- Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • Bodycam Shows Florida ...
Law&Crime Network’s channel: / lawcrimenetwork
Source:
Articles-
bit.ly/3eYsGcT (contains a copy of the citizen complaint and internal investigation report)
bit.ly/3RFn865
bit.ly/3Sc76Qu
Fla. Stat. § 901.151- bit.ly/3rxIgNV
Fla. Stat. § 812.015- bit.ly/3xzw9Fr
Fla. Stat. § 901.15- bit.ly/3zaI4cs
Bent v. State- bit.ly/3qMtLHq
JSO Response to Resistance Policy (Order 551)- bit.ly/3qLfhYq
Fla. Stat. § 843.02- bit.ly/3rxR6eD
Zivojinovich v. Barner- bit.ly/3zicI3N
Vadimsky v. City of Melbourne- bit.ly/3oET50V
Robinson v. State- bit.ly/3BR9A1h
Seiracki v. State- bit.ly/3BNhoBb
![[UNCUT] ฝันรักห้วงนิทรา | EP.8 (4/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RDYJYiDwsj0/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for watching today's episode. Be sure to watch to the end to see the aftermath of this incident. It helps the channel out a lot too! See you in the next one. Cheers!
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Hi brother,
the photo looks like racist click baiting. why did you guys photoshop a foreign asian police who had nothing to do with the video?
Just a heads up, law and crime has a history of stirking/flagging video's that use any of "their" material.
@@DCG909 which is public domain
It’s crazy after the arrest he’s willing to go in and check the cameras when she was willing to go inside and clear up the incident.
Cops will literally kill you because they think they are busy.
She lost me when she pulled out the Race Card ..
@@wmb5240Clown pfp, circus in your head.
prior to the arrest he stated he had no access to the cameras.
i totally side with the lady. the walmart rep has no grounds for demanding ID without probable cause (and, clearly, there existed no probable cause).
Racist assholes that’s why. I would never move to Florida even though this is a nationwide issue in the US.
“We investigated ourselves and determined we did nothing wrong.”
Golden comment
good ol' blue line JUSTICE ⚖
Police should never police the police. Nine times out of 10 they'll find themselves innocent of any wrongdoing and nothing will get done.
Officer,! I searched myself and found no contraband.
YET AGAIN! They investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing!
lol yes. it's like someone being accused of a crime but they investigate themselves and say "there was no wrongdoing. i did not commit that crime." such useless POS
Exactly how fuckin pathetic fuvkin tyrants
I'd fight it to a higher court. That was BS
We dont need to prove our innocence.....they need to prove our guilt
That’s for the courts to decide. They don’t actually have the power decide guilt or innocence, though they think they are judge, jury, and executioner.
@@mixedviews3536 wrong. They cant make you do something to "prove your innocence"....and they can only arrest you if they have reasonable evidence that you are guilty.
It doesnt matter about the courts....you are ALWAYS innocent UNTILL proven guilty.
The cops need to ASSUME you are innocent untill they have reasonable evidence that proves otherwise
@@mixedviews3536 judge dredd
@@iseehowitis9382 yessss! Good reference: D
It’s always been guilty until proven innocent, nothing changes
It is a policy of UK police that officers MUST NOT work as security guards at the same time. Now I see why.
its also a policy of uk police to encourage mysogyny and racism and to dismiss complaints against fellow officers especially domestic violence and drunk driving
It was bad verbiage. He was working off duty but still working as a police officer.
Majority of officers make shit money until they get years in which leads to secondary jobs, example a city of 155,000 paid 1-3 years of service $15-18 an hour, in said city I was maintenence Supervisor of 280 luxury apartments that ranged from $1200 - 4000 a month and I was making $22 an hour and free apartment with 3 years as Supervisor experience
There are questions here, if he was working security, why didn’t he view the video first before accusing this woman of theft, and why didn’t any other employee take the time to check the footage before this huge mistake was made? If they found out after all of this that she didn’t steal the items this stupid cop would’ve arrested her anyway from secondary charges stemming from the false arrest and accusations, fruit from the poisonous tree as they say!
@@ibrahim-sj2cr mysogyny and racism ? not sure what planet you are from as thats the dumbest statement i expect to read this month , well done , go speak to a cop for 5 minutes rather than following the blm mantra of black=victim
The complaints and ways they deal with ..... legitimate ...... complaints is to the point of criminality . Until they answer to crimes they commit and stop closing ranks to avoid accountability then respect is lost and the police force is a complete farce .
When did we start saying "guilty until proven innocent"... it's the poilce and stores burden to show proof, not hers!
July 4th, 1776
I know, the whole video starts out with the cup telling her she has to prove her innocence. I'm gonna taser you. what a fucking lunatic. when they profile trash to wear their costumes to assault and batter and taze common men and women
@@lilpenguin092 lol, some historian you are! July 4th 1776 is what created the start of due process "innocent until proven guilty'...
Around 2016
Exactly... There is a reason we don't do listen and believe, cause this is why.
Some people think when an accusation is done, police needs to arrest the person and that person needs to show they are INNOCENT.
But that is NOT TRUE! Cause a person in jail cannot find evidence in jail of their innocence.
Doesn't matter what accusation is done... if you have no proof of allegation, you are false allegating someone.
The officer could only detain them to find out their side of the story and request the person to stay till they finish the investigaton.
If they did steal.. they would be hunted down with a warrant.
If they didn't they can move along...
Officers crimes are washed away after 5 years but they make ours stay with us for life.
They're not officers, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo
@@mikeveis6393💯
“Guilty until proven innocent.”
Not in "tHe LaNd oF tHe fRee."
That’s meant to apply to courts of law
This blows my mind. Where I live the self-service machines ask if you even want your receipt printed.
Exactly, 99% of the time, I do not take the receipt when I make a purchase. My online bank statement provides all the "proof of purchase" I have ever needed.
Where ever I go I always get a receipt
My local grocery emails my receipt to me. If I don't have my phone with me I can't show a receipt.
@@kingmichaeln1 I shall now.
Half the places I shop, I don't even get a paper receipt, it goes to email or an app.
So it's not investigate, arrest,jail.....it's arrest,jail,investigate .....I understand now
Wow, poor lady got tasered and wrongfully arrested but sue for only $50k. I’d definitely sue for $5 million in that case.
im sure you would have gotten 5 million, you are so intelligent
Depending on the state there is a cap for how much a person can sue for. So even if you win you may get way less than what you asked for by law in that state. its unfortunate.
The funny thing is that she is accused of stealing food. Food theft in a country where people spend 3% of their income on food. It's just bullshit! 😀
Civil suits are a whole different beast. There are lower thresholds to actually win the case than criminal court (more probable than not for civil, beyond a reasonable doubt for criminal), but you first have to prove a monetary value for what’s called “actual damages” (some kind of concrete number, not just IAED) before you can seek punitive damages, which is what would be paid for gross negligence above and beyond actual damages. Legal Eagle has some pretty good videos explaining the civil process compared to criminal law.
Edit: Yes, punitive damages can be capped by various jurisdictional guidelines for different types of cases. I forgot to mention that the first time around.
@@sally8708 Not really true. There are many cases where the police officer simply hand-cuffs a citizen, then releases them immediately without using a taser, but the city agreed to pay $50k. In those cases, the citizen didn't have visible physical damage but their right was violated, and the punitive damage was paid for the loss the freedom, which is protected by the constitution. It is not always true that the victims have to prove physical damage.
He actually says "without your receipt I can't prove you didn't steal it". He's got the law upside down. He has to prove that she did steal it - innocent until proven guilty
Nowadays stores don't give you receipts. I pay cash for everything so I have to ask them for a receipt.
what he's getting at is "you look like a person (black) that would steal something". Cops are the worst.
Innocent until proven guilty is not the case alot of the time.
@@marshleslie2476 Throughout history it has never been the case. It is a new thing over the past 400 years and everybody is terrible at it. Just watch any accusation on TV or the internet and the second it comes up people have decided on the guilt or innocence of the person with little to no information.
That's why they need better training, they police like there shit don't stink.
*completes purchase
"do you want your receipt?"
"no"
"we got em boys, 5-0. swarm in."
Remember when they automatically gave you a receipt? Now I have to ASK them for my receipt. Wtf.
I NEVER say no to that question. You shouldn't either.
Yeah like sometimes it can bypass a print and save a bit of thermal paper, but even with fast food it's like "wait a sec is that the right order?" sometimes
@@BillCollins0707 I always say no, why do I need a receipt of purchase AFTER I PURCHASED IT
I don't need to prove anything to anyone
@@Bananasinpajams yea sure, i never have to return anything ever. i just throw it away if its not correct or doesnt work.
The fact that it only takes four to six months in the police academy is a absolute "JOKE" It takes longer than that to pass the 5th grade. Two years for a license barber , and about four years to be a journeymen electrician.
Great point. I've often thought the same. They're grossly ignorant of the law they're supposed to uphold.
You can bet Publix jumped at the opportunity to settle for $50k, or less. She should have started at no less than $500k. I can't recall if she's suing the police department/city. Hopefully she is. She deserves a lot more than $50k.
she black 50k is like 5million to them
I'd take the 50k. Imagine how long a 500k settlement, etc.would take. In many cases money doesn't stink. A day to remenber, a story to tell and 50k. Why not.
@@johannes1553 I hear ya. I'm saying they would have probably settled for $500k just as quick. For a million dollar plus settlement, yes, I could see it being dragged out a lot longer in court.
@@VagPoop_I just saw a black teen get $350,000 because they took him out of his car and cuffed him for a minor traffic infraction
How can a suit be dismissed with prejudice if it's settled amicably? Isn't dismissing with prejudice something done to warn a litigator or plaintiff that their suit is considered frivolous, and similar suits should not be brought before that court again? Just a question, because that detail seemed really odd to me.
Other than that, these videos are great. They tend to be balanced, nuanced, and fair. Nice work.
Internal Affairs are one of the major issues with policing today, everytime the exonerate an officer like this they undermine the profession and earn the hate and disrespect they so desperately desire.
Umm... Actually, the problem is that being a cop is a dream job for a psycho whilst at the same time, a psycho is the dream candidate for police recruiters. What you all need to wake up to is the fact that your Government is putting the school-bullies in charge of the playground. The US out-Chinas China; _that's_ the problem.
Amen!
This guy was not working as a police officer. He was OFF DUTY working as a security guard. How is he allowed to act like he is in his official capacity as an officer? And how does he have the same protections that he would have as an officer? At that point he is nothing more than a store security guard. No cop should ever be allowed to work in this type of position.
another fair question is he using gear paid for by the state for police use? when he is moonlighting?
store security guard and he doesnt have access to store cameras?
Security guard, arresting a customer. He wants to search her. Whoa!
I’m so sick of internal investigations. Needs to be a third party!
It would be infiltrated and corrupted days later. There is no justice.
America isn’t what they say it is anymore.
Idk, I’ve found that when it comes to investigations people are never satisfied. Third party? Obviously fake and a cop out. Internal? Obviously fake and a cop out.
I’m not sure what the solution is cuz it is a problem and I agree corruption is hard to expose.
The DA's office should do their job and play a more active role in reviewing internal affairs issues, rather than letting police 'police' themselves.
I just wish a third party would investigate joe and hunter Biden.
Yea. Even if they found dishonest ways around that it would still be a step in the right direction.
She indicated she was willing to go back into the store to resolve the issue but he deliberately chose the path of pain and excessive violence and should be not only fired but charged for his crimes.
Really? Which planet are you on?
@@jpnewman1688 interesting how two people can watch the same video and arrive at opposite conclusions..
Do you know what de-escalation training is ?
Because it's blindingly obvious that this guy doesn't have a clue what that is..
If a store accuses some one of stealing, they better IMMEDIATELY have PROOF of such crime in order to arrest !
The lady is quite right that it's EXTREMELY aggravating to be accused of theft !
You don't get to walk up to someone and accuse them of stealing and start demanding reciepts & ID when you have zero proof of any crime...that would make ANYBODY who shops there a POTENTIAL CRIMINAL that MUST PROVE THIER INNOCENT or recieve this EXACT TREATMENT OF EXCESSIVE VIOLENCE..
@@jpnewman1688 I'm fairly certain you misread the comment.
@@leboef7098 not. It's the people who still believe that government is there to "serve and protect" sheep and to hold sheep dogs accountable are the ones mistaken.
@@aaronhumphrey2009 did you watch the entire video and see what happened to this sheep dog?
I bet you voted repeatedly, right?
It's not a laughing matter but she was amazing for saying "no I'm not" every time the LEO kept saying "you're going to jail". She's a legend.
Righttt,😅 I was just amazed how the Officer said “I’m gunna taze you”*points gun, and she opened her chest right up, like saying “Go for it” Like whaaaaaat that was gangster. ( incredibly inhumane tho, we all know that was an unreasonable use of force and full abuse of power) That cop kinda sucks for that
@@famefree499 she literally took a tazer to the _______ ! she gets an A++ from me
Here in America, I guess you are guilty until you prove you're innocent.
Here in America, "reasonable" people would rather show you their receipt than risk having their children taken from them. They would also rather show you the receipt rather than be arrested or tased. She did the right thing offering to go back in the store with him and talk to the checkout person who checked her items, but when the officer refused or ignored that, seriously she escalated the rest of that on her own accord.
Cop did try to de-escalate at first, but neither of them were willing to make concessions to the other. Notice how the very first second we get of this encounter the woman is shouting, refusing to look the officer in the eyes, and seems to WANT to turn this into a spectacle. She knew what she was doing. Maybe the officer profiled her, but how do you combat profiling? Don't feed into the stereotype further... Do the unexpected and actually be pleasant, show the receipt, and get back home with your kids and groceries. If it was an overstep by the officer, file a complaint the normal way. If it gets squashed, at least YOU didn't stoop down to their level just for them to beat you with experience. I don't think I have ever had a problem with showing my receipt to an employee or security guard. Why would I unless I had something to hide?
@@Bancheis
@@undercoveragent9889 That's a bit ridiculous and quite inflammatory my dear friend. First of all, expecting people to have some personal responsibility is not the same as justifying lethal force. Saying that someone escalated the situation is not the same as saying the officer should respond in kind. I am merely explaining that there were multiple ways this situation could have turned out differently, and you have to pick and choose your battles.
Being asked to show your receipt when you came out of a grocery store is not the same as being asked to provide identification when you are not legally obligated to. If you choose to make a fuss over it instead of just sighing and showing the receipt, then you have to take some responsibility for the direction the rest of the encounter goes because you decided you wanted to be difficult. Maybe a normal grocery worker would say "F- it, not worth the hassle" and walk away, but if the employee of the establishment doesn't do that, you have an easy way to make them leave satisfied that they did their due diligence.
You can call me names and whatever you want. I think that is unreasonable, but you have a right to do so. I assume you are just a troll and want to pick a fight. People who act like that just have to deal with whatever consequences come from such a decision. Happy holidays fellow internet person. Keep bringing joy to the comment sections.
I know it will fall on deaf ears, but as a resident of Jacksonville, I immediately emailed the mayor regarding this.
You did the right thing. Who knows, maybe your email actually got read and made a difference.
As a resident, I would get ahold of Publix as well. The manager created the situation by making the claim without checking video. He could have asked her to stop while he does so or asked the cops to hold her briefly while they did so (she even offered to wait or go with), but him and the cop did it the hard way, assuming she was guilty and assaulting her. The manager should be fired for profiling her resulting in assault and arrest when she was never guilty. Being angry and stubborn and such are part free speech and refusing to show id or receipt - while possibly silly and throwing gasoline on the fire - is perfectly legal. Somebody should go audit the store while that manager is working, see whom else he wants to profile.
@@TCK-9 That's a good point, the manager could have easy do that. It is offensive to be accused of being a thief where you are totally not.
@@beatricem1838 probably not unless you are literally in the government in Jacksonville and being ambiguous to not drum up to much attention
You might wanna share with family and friends. You might naturally get a soft boycott going
The worst part of this is that she had to wait for six hours in order to get the darts removed, that's just wrong.
From her “private area”, holy crap. Imagine being tased in there. That must have hurt!
I just started the video and I’m browsing the comments, and oh my gosh wow! I don’t know if I want to watch the rest… That sounds terrible. And she has her kids there!
Knowing how things work in an ER, she only had to wait so long because she was brought in being under arrest. That's commonly done if it's non life threatening. When all others are taken care of then she is attended. This is normally because officers have spewed their version and of course, the victim waits.
The worst part is there was no regard for her children, and the officer made coercive threats to call state child endangerment...the usual threats to black women with children etc., It's clear he was racially profiling her and felt good saying how all the shoppers are black, sounded like something he says in private but much worse.
Just their way os saying, "Respect muh 'thority."
The fact that someone can just accuse you and all of a sudden that "reasonable" suspicion. You'll have to taser me for my new boots and fur coat, thank you very much!
"How am I supposed to prove you're innocent if you don't show me the receipt" It's crazy that an officer can so blatantly disregard the constitution and the concept of innocent until proven guilty SMH
Exactly.
@@skitz042o2It's difficult to tell if he is an idiot or was intentionally ignoring the fact that he needed proof or at the very least probable cause beyond the manager saying "I didn't see her pay".
Law enforcement doesn’t like the constitution.
cops arent a court... in the court its innocent until proven guilty
@@john2g1It's difficult to understand if you are just an idiot, ATA already said he would have had probable cause.
I love the grading of the lady, not only did she refuse to assist in his investigation she also suggested several alternate ways to investigate lmao
I'm with her in principle. Like showing i.d. it will happen when certain requirements are met. Granted she let her eo.tions get to her and exploded. I agree with the stance though. I'll never show my receipts. I will go inside. Talk with the employees, then potentially sue the business when they have no proof( because I'm not a theif)
I have no legal obligation to assist with an officer's investigation. And I hate that the quickest way to resolve this would have been to give up her rights and show the receipt.
@@ianbattles7290 exactly
I agree.. just because "He" got a call doesn't mean that
the accusations of the store is valid. It is up to the store to provide proof of which she mentioned that he could view the camera footage. He chose not to and automatically assumed she would assist him in his investigation. This is the problem with this type of stuff..." Hey You will assist me in doing my job although I personally did not see you stealing but I took the word of the store employee".
@@xenosayain1506 Shopkeeper's rights says you are never going to win that suit.
Interesting: the use of a taser was found to be justified in the police report but Audit the Audit said with her arms at her side there was no justification for its use. It's almost like if any institution investigates itself isn't going to find itself guilty. Hmm.
So you expect sheep dogs not to lie?
I would say it lowers the odds( considerably?).
White RACE SOLDIERS ALWAYS DEFEND EACH OTHER
No clue why he said that in his report but as soon as she was passively resisting and trying to avoid being taken out the situation was entirely justified by police standards I would think.
I know that sounds crazy but it always comes down to if you are charged or whatever you need to fight it in court. Not on the road etc.
I don't know if it's really worth it to taser her but she had specific warnings and ignored it. This probably was the main reason why he wasn't charged. Especially if he had a representative from the union defending his interests.
@@nomore-constipation Maybe because he had no probable cause for the arrest or because Ms Crowell was open to go back to the store. The officer was only interested in her ID and not in verify if a crime was committed.
I give her an "A" for knowing her rights and having the courage to stand her ground. She even kept it up in the back seat of the police car after being tased. She did give him great alternatives to pursue whether or not a crime had been committed and was offering to stay/ not trying to flee. I wish her lawyer would have helped her file a Federal lawsuit for violating her civil rights.
I never understood why it is necessary for the store to demand to see your receipt after you've gone through checkout. With the cameras all over the place it's just another invasion of privacy.
How is it an invasion of privacy to show a receipt? The store prints the receipt as a proof of purchase. It’s a lot easier to flash a piece of paper than to go through the cameras confirming every single purchase. Please just use ur head for 3 seconds
It's lazy to have to ask a customer for a receipt, security/cop should have been on the cameras and watching!!! Just because a staff member didn't see her pay doesn't mean she automatically stole anything!!! Cops are scum!!!
How many times do you have to PROVE you paid for something? Some cops are just power hungry idiots! @@ezay8694
"You won't give me your i.d, so I don't know if you stole or not"
The logic of this one sentence says it all
More like.... "You haven't done anything illegal.... but I want to run your ID to see if you have any warrants"
@@airtec87 Nah they don't need a warrant to arrest people they don't like
ore video and then really arrest her later at home? Or not to put yourself on the spot by tazing and arresting a woman who won't cooperate,
why doesnt the silly monkey give the reciept
Huh lmfao
Remember that judge that was caught pushing a full cart unpaid for merchandise out of wal-mart... TWICE, but was never even arrested?
Pigs
Yes, his name was Williams. He was never arrested for it.
She asked for his sergeant before he shot her!
They investigated themselves and found no wrong doing. Imagine that.
the police investigated themselves and found no wrongdoing 👀 25 complaints filed against him, quite the sterling reputation, and those are just the citizens who went to the trouble to file formal complaints…yet in the end the force remains in force…well done as always
25 complaints about "racial biasing". Sounds like a pretty spotless record honestly, if that's the worst that he's had filed against him.
25 complaints from black people who totally never use the line "It's because I'm black right?" to deflect from their refusal to follow lawful instructions of a police officer.
Play stupid games, win "shocking" prizes mofos.
Wouldn't you like to see nationwide statistics of how many complaints that are investigated by the same dept are found as NO WRONGDOING. I'd be quite shocked if it wasn't at least 90%. It's a complete travesty that the department that TAUGHT the officer how to act...investigates these allegations against cops.
@@Reinforce_Zwei so I suppose the woman in this video was just a mofo playing stupid games?!?
@@Reinforce_Zwei Dude, You are not required to assist in any investigations by police. You have a 4th and 5th amendment right to not answer any questions. She exercised those rights and was tased for it. Take your jackboots somewhere else. Talking to cops does no good for anyone..ever.
One of these days that bastard is going to run into the wrong individual at a party.
I’ve always considered myself a supporter of law abiding law-enforcement. I admit, when I first saw your channel, I thought it was a witchhunt against all police officers. After watching many of your videos and extremely thorough references to the legal statutes I have done a complete 180° turn around and appreciate everyone of your videos and all your hard work. I especially appreciate how you grade the officers at the end to show that you were being extremely fair based on their interactions.
There's a big gaping hole in our laws. Citizens have certain rights and obligations depending on the nature of the encounter. Their obligations in a casual chat are very different from cooperation in a crime investigation. But police have no duty to inform you which it is. They don't have to explain what evidence they're going on. So you think it's a friendly chat, they think it's a crime scene, and you talk past each other. You're left to guess on what's needed of you in a situation.
Same. It speaks well that occasionally we'll read comments accusing AtA of simultaneously being anti-police and pro-bootlicking. That is when I know I'm following a channel that has balance. 😅
Thank god nobody cares
@@CandanceIsMyName
there is a reason why a rap group made a song called fuck the police
These videos are so valuable. The analysis is top notch.
When you pay for an item it belongs to you. They have to prove you stole it. Not the other way around.
Not necessarily, all a cop needs is a store representative to levy an accusation. Then the accussed needs to present proof of purchase or it can be construed as theft. if they had to be detained, they then can look at camera footage to determine the truth. Theres several factors that must ALL be met for a accusation to be levied, and only certain people can take any action
@@Rebel3000 agreed. Of course, you may be spitting into the wind on this channel.
@@Rebel3000 no they would have to have seen you take without paying. Unless you wanna lose your job and have your store or yourself sued in a civil lawsuit. The reason why is a lot of people wouldn't pay full attention to people coming and going if they are working unless it's their jobs to mainly do so. There is many court cases about this with stores. There is a big reason why ata always uses court cases in his video. Theresa a good reason why stores have cameras its ti catch and charge the person with theft. Also not every time your going to see someone buy their items unless you are at the check out area and are paying full attention
Yes, and they can detain you until they’re satisfied that no crime was committed.
@@Rebel3000 Wrong. The accuser needs to provide evidence that they stole something.
I give her a lot of credit for not showing the receipt. Cops get away with invading our privacy so often because most of us take the path of least resistance, thereby never holding the police accountable for these breaches. It would’ve been easy for her to show the receipt and prove she hadn’t stolen anything, but she stood her ground despite the officer escalating the situation.
It’s not her job to prove her innocence, it’s his to prove otherwise
Manager made an accusation, that gives rise to reasonable suspicion. The detention was lawful.
Well the fact she didn't have a receipt, shows she was shoplifting
@@ToxicTeemoOCE so shes guilty until proven innocent in your delusional little brain?
@@ToxicTeemoOCE you didn't watch the video did you 🤣
@@gagewallen3840 yes, I saw her refusing to provide a receipt, because she didn't have one. If she did, she would have provided it.
Audit, the audit should be a nationwide television broadcast show. You do an amazing job.
No
How does giving her ID help determine if a crime has happened? This lady was willing to go back into the store so this officer can complete his investigation but this officer didn't want to do anything but get ID and arrest her.
I.D.s are like crack to cops
That GARBAGE "COP" also lied when she told him to go look at the video and he said that he can't.
THAT'S A BOLD FACED LIE!
Cops OFTEN go and have the store manager show them the videos.
THAT'S CALLED INVESTIGATING!
The run ur name for warrants . They are not just gonna interact and not ask or get the name . Simple maths and u made it sound like rocket science
@@SofaKingGoood It is that simple. They are trained that everyone is a possible criminal. Always get the ID no matter what so they can run it for warrants and add the name into their system. Cop could have just run her plates but that need for the ID is strong. It also shows the public who is the alpha in the encounter. He needed to show her "who's the boss".
Shhhh you'll confuse all the cops and cop lovers with such logic. It hurts their little egos when you come up with a better solution.
Here's another insane thing: "off duty cop acting as security guard." Why on Earth does he have police powers when acting as a private security guard? That's not right.
Because he’s not off duty, this TH-camr is an idiot. This specific Publix is down the street from and they always have a cop up there because of crime and they are on duty. It’s been like that for years.
On top of that, they are using equipment that was purchased with tax payer money to work for a private corporation.
Wow. This reminds me of a situation that happened to me and my friends one day and all the police had to do was watch the cameras. Long story short my car broke down at a del taco, we just needed to jump my battery so we walked around asking everyone for a jump. We finally found a construction worker that helped us out. We go inside del taco one last time to use the restroom and grab a water cup before we left. As I’m pulling out the parking lot the damn manager is like running after my car taking pictures of us. At first I kinda slowed down but I just brushed it off like whatever n kept it moving. I thought he was mad at my friend cauze he took lemonade instead of water lol. But my buddy was like bruh I just grabbed water to lol idk why he was doing that. We completely forget about that whole incident and as the day went on I was driving across a bridge that entered into a different city. We noticed a cop staring right at us as we drove by him but we didn’t really pay much attention to it. Until I come to a stop sign and a cop lets me go first when he had the right away. I nod my head with a wave saying thank you as I thought he was just being polite. Nope! He pulls right behind my car and was on my ASS. When I finally take another turn he flips the lights on to initiate a traffic stop. But before I could do anything like 7 undercover cars swarm all around us, mind you this is like mid rush hour traffic so they stop all cars in the area blocked off an entire intersection. Literally within in seconds of that first cop pulling us over we were surrounded by 30 cops with guns pointed at us and everything. They completely stopped all traffic and actually evacuated people out of the cars that were next to ours. Just completely blocked off the entire street it was fkn crazy! They made me throw the keys out the window, step out back up to the sound of my voice etc etc… same with my two buddies in the car. They made me walk backwards until my back hit the barrel of a cops shotgun. The cop even said “go ahead move one muscle please give me a reason to shoot you.” They then handcuffed and separated all 3 of us into different cop cars where we would spend the next 2 and half hours in the heat with no ac in the middle of California summer. The police wouldnt tell any of us why this was happening for hours except one dick ass cop coming back to yell at me every 5 minutes while they were searching my cars asking me “where the f*** is the gun at?! You don’t want to tel me okay don’t worry when we find it, we’ll make sure you get the maximum sentence.” Then would slam the door and go back to ripping my car apart. They threw my homework for college all over the car floor and spilled my drink all over it. They ripped my center console off its factory seal. Just completely destroyed my car. I kept trying to tell that coo I had no idea what they were talking about I kept asking them why they were doing this and told them there is definitely no gun in my vehicle! After they couldn’t find the gun they finally had a cop come talk to me. Again this is like 2-3 hours later. The officer said look we don’t know much except your license plate came back as “under investigation for an armed robbery” that occurred earlier this afternoon in the neighboring city (Citrus Heights PD of Sacramento county) That’s all we know and we have police from that city on the way out here to come talk to you. We were in the city of Folsom CA when all this happened. Finally after another couple hours, 2 officers from Citrus Heights PD showed up and they were even worse!!!! Treated us like we were straight dirt. They said this guy was robbed at gun point for his wallet at a del taco by a black guy with short dreads and a red shirt. Which just happens to fit my friends description to a T! They said the victim was on the way to see if we were the people who indeed robbed him. This entire time we kept saying check the del taco cameras we had absolutely nothing to do with this shit. We’re not that kind of people!!!!!! Nope they didn’t believe us. So much for innocent until proven guilty 🤦♂️ while we waited for the victim to show up the police kept harassing us and trying to scare us into snitching on each other. But none of us had anything to do with this crap! “Don’t want to talk to us huh? That’s okay will make sure you get the maximum sentence for all your charges.” Dude they were so evil man. They were ready to destroy all of our lives right there!!! We were so excited when the victim got there cause he can see we weren’t the ones who robbed him! But nope. He fkn points out my black friend cause he looked exactly like the real guy who robbed him. But he told the cops he didn’t see my car or me n my other friend that was with us. They tried to scare us into telling the “truth” again but we already were!!! So they arrested my buddy for armed robbery. No gun was found and it was solely based on the victim pointing him out. They let me and my other buddy go but not without more threats. Again we kept saying to check the damn cameras at del taco. They didn’t care. I even went to visit my buddy in Sacramento county jail and on my way out. Get this. 50 cops swarm me as I was getting into my car parked at a parking meter right in front of the jail entrance. I was detained YET AGAIN! For 2 hours because they forgot to take my license plate out the system. DUDE WTF!!!!!!
It took them 1 week for them to check the del taco cameras to see it was a different guy who robbed that man in the parking lot. So my friend did a week in jail for absolutely nothing. We filed complaints but we were young n dumb but also scared to take action against them. We definitely should have tho and it’s one of my biggest regrets. This was definitely way before body cams. Ahhh sorry for the so called short story lmfao but as I started typing it just makes me so frustrated as I reminisce this horrible memory. Those cops treated us like we were FBI most wanted.
Sacramento County Jail
Sacramento Police Dept
Citrus Heights Police Dept
Folsom Police Dept
All of Sacramento county and the cities within it are all corrupt af. They have 0 good cops their alll rotten! Cause if the so called good cops can’t point out the bad ones when they fuck up. Then their all rotten. OooooOoo sorry for the long post but god this makes me so mad. All they had to do was watch the damn camera and none of that would of happened. I wish we filed a lawsuit against them. We need accountability. I’m sorry I didn’t do my part when I should have but we were young, dumb and didn’t know any better. But one thing was for certain. We were scared of retaliation if we did go forward with that. Stay safe y’all. Again. I’m Sorry for the long comment.
Why do they always want you to maintain a calm demeanor while they screw you over?
Being calm is the best mode of behavior regardless of the situation. You maintaining a calm demeanor (and maybe knowing some basics about your rights) is actually in your benefit, even if the police officer "wants" you to have it. This is chess - not checkers.
It’s just a power trip-they generally want you to overreact which is why they tell you to be calm so much. They want total control over your body, and mind, because they believe they are superior to a normal citizen
@@depletable it also makes people more sympathetic to you because you're calm and collected while the officers are obviously escalating the situation. Helps a lot in court later
I am not gonna lie - based on the employees report of shoplifting, and her response and actions, I would have thought she was likely guilty of shoplifting.
If the lady was calm, and just showed her receipt, problem solved. I’m sorry, but if a police officer or employee asked me to see my receipt, i would just show them. Why make a mountain out of a molehill?
If a police officer questions you regarding a possible crime and you’re innocent, does that mean you should be belligerent, loud and rude?
Instead it’s racism racism racism.
When i interact with police or store employees, I’m polite and cooperative. I have never been tased or arrested.
Its great how he threatens to take the kids to dcf if she doesnt give up her rights
When youre kidnapped by the state and taken into captivity after they've tased/beaten/killed/arrested your mom... He is the first monster you meet. But not the worst.
He didn’t even validate the claim. Too lazy to watch the video first. Loved being the big man bully. Nothing more.
What do stores even have security cameras for, if they can't look at it to see if someone stole?
We need to show Ms. C THAT WE SUPPORT HER AND HELP GIVE HER A GIFT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR STANDING UP FOR HUMANITY, GOOD HUMANITY...
Need to ditch qualified immunity so badly. Why a person can't be responsible for their own actions and decisions is beyond me
There’s a deeper issue: why are ordinary people required to know the law but police officers aren’t?
There is a use for QI, but as it's implemented now, it is waaay too vague, way too broadly applied and has too many loop holes for cops to use.
The idea that a police officer should be harder to sue in civil or criminal court than a general person is completely asinine. It should be easier. We give an incredible amount of power and responsibility to police. They should be swiftly and harshly dealt with when they do wrong.
How many people missed that she offered to go back to the store with him and talk to the clerk who checked her out, but he refused?
Law Enforcement, “Useless when they’re needed the most, destructive when they’re needed the least.”
There is no situation that cannot be made worse by involving the police.
ignorance of the law is no excuse unless you're a cop then it's a defense to keep qualified immunity
"How dismal it is to see present day Americans yearning for the very orthodoxy that their country was founded to escape." - Christopher Hitchens
@@eltorocal There is no situation that cannot be made worse by involving the police. So sad and true and true
I know, right!? So simple. He could have just walked back in with her. I like simple solutions. I just thought of another, she could have simply shown him her receipt. How much easier would that have been?
@@okcommut3r.... simple how it is the cop and the store's job to prove that she is a criminal and not her job to prove her innocence. Burden of proof lies with the accusers.
@@tomm487 Here is Tom, another burden of proof guy who thinks this video is a depiction of a courtroom trial. I’m surprised you did try to jam the word “onus” into your comment as well. Let me try though, try to entertain your misinformed thought. If such a think as burden of proof exists in this video interaction, the real burden was that the officer was attempting to investigate the claim of theft and the accused was doing everything possible to thwart his efforts to discover the truth. Her behavior is what let to the unfortunate situation. His actions were justified.
On some level there has to be a point where you're like oh well I know I didn't steal hand him the receipt it's done take your complaint that someone accused you of being a thief take that complaint and follow it later this is ridiculous sometimes it's not worth it
"Well I don't have to call your Mom to come get them" You're really threatening to take someone's child away from them by calling CPS over them not showing you their receipt? This dude is scary.
All this over a stupid receipt these cops really need to pick their battles better
his feelings are hurt so he has to make her hurt too
This is the worst part of the video for me
There was an unmistakeable sadistic tone to his threat there. What a horrible man. His little "You're going to jail!" taunt was also rather pathetic. Looks like they're going to clear him on this one, but hopefully fate catches up with him and he gets fired. Clearly not fit to be a police officer.
@@robswan4170 why wouldn't they. Thanks to all the insanity since BLM started almost all the good copsquit. The standards were lowered and replaced by bullies. I know 3 state troopers who left because of executions of random cops after floyd. One got pulled over a year later and was shocked at the crap the ndw recruits were getting away with.
Basically is because of the lack of accountability towards the bad apples. The good ones rotted, quit, and abandoned the job fof their safety. All were left with is mostly bullies.
WITNESSED SHOPLIFTING is the key here.
No one witnessed her shoplifting. No one!
There was nothing to witness, because she's not a thief. She was presumed to be a black thug thief based on the clerks unconscious (probably conscious) bias.
@@malcolmjelani3588 that is a stretch, as much of one as the shopkeeper stating she may have shoplifted. Your blackness is showing, try to avoid the "racializing" of everything you encounter.
but they didnt witness her paying. that's why the asked for a simple receipt check, something solvable in 5 minutes
Sorry the COPS are not the court they are not there in render any verdict. They will detain you on reasonable suspicion and let the court decide. The dimwit could have shown the receipt to remove any reasonable suspicion he may have had and instead wanted the drama she got.
@@silverwolf6866 the suspicion was not reasonable
Can you hear the massive amount of stress in his voice, this guy can not handle his emotions or remain calm when he thought he was going to need force, someone who cant handle that stress is a wild card and the next time her might pull the wrong weapon when using force
If a cop has to use multiple different threats to get you to comply, it’s because they have no PC to talk to you in the first place.
True.
Let's be honest, there needs to be accountability with store managers or employees that call the police and make a false claim.
More so like the cops need to remember that their jobs are there to serve and protect the citizens, not big conglomerates. The way I see it the view of this call should have been "I recieved a call of someone accusing her of a crime, I need to see something proving she has commited this act you accuse her of! "
I'm amazed at the response time! He got there and was able to find her all before she made it to her car and drove off. I can't even find my own car that fast
I just asked them on Facebook why they have managers too stupid to check a camera
@@greyspot00 they sit outside the store here
I'd be willing to pay a traveler to fly a sign outside their storefronts
The store employee didn’t say they saw her steal just that they didn’t see her pay.
Is purchasing something and then reentering/exiting a store with that merchandise in your hand/bag considered "probable cause" of shoplifting?
And just because that person didn't see her pay doesn't mean she didn't.
Highway Patrol: "Another motorist said you ran a red light. I didn't see it, do you have any proof that the light was green? If not, I'm arresting you." 😂
@@selmaave9145 "Well I said you planted drugs on me, Officer, *so that's (apparently) all the evidence you need to arrest yourself!!!"*
@@therainbowhomestead398 absolutely
25 times before! He needs to be fired!
My question is why does a off duty officer still have his police issued equipment? Body cam, taser, etc.
"We investigated ourselves and have found that we have done nothing wrong." This is insanity. We are paying for our own oppression.
and officer gets an F for turning off his body camera during his investigation
Love your channel. Keep up your great work
She's going to jail for not proving me she's innocent
How about you doing your job and proving she's guilty?! Comply...obey...be a good obedient citizen! This Nanny state behavior from the State is out of control! They work for us, not the other way around!
This isn't "nanny state" this is "Gestapo state".
@@thewhitefalcon8539 Yeah I know bro and it's running wild. But I'm happy watching these videos, that people are learning their rights and fighting back!
“You’re under arrest for not cooperating.”
That’s not a crime. It’s an inconvenience to the cop.
Edit: spellcheck thanks to @:p
You're
EXACTLY!!!!
@@ashaman011 fair is fair
Perfect
@@ashaman011 Nah; proper grammar is too intelligent for that moron. (the cop; not OP. OP is fine. I'm mocking the cop because the cop didn't know how to do his job)
I was surprised it took him so long to threaten the children. Usually kids and pets are their go-to.
im surprised he didnt taze the kids too
@@handyvan3422 Really? You've seen a lot officers tazing kids afer arresting the parent?
@@toasternfriends3329 He tazed her for nothing, so why not to taze kids?
@@lesp315 Stupid logic. I'll ask again, where have you seen police officers tazing kids buckled in the backseat of a car?
Really !!
It 100% makes sense to show your reciept.
No. It does not.
I mean, it is an option for sure. It 100% makes more sense for the officer to do his job and now unlawfully detain this woman, assault her or arrest her.
The ole "I can't prove you didn't steal anything if you don't show me your ID"
Only problem is that this lady was willing to go back into the store to let the officer complete his investigation. He didn't want to do an investigation. He just wanted to lock her up.
That part
Yup. "I don't have access to the footage". LIAR!!!
👏👏
The sheep dog was angry when the sheep didn't obey its commands.
That's one racist pig of a cop, The less of cops on our streets like him the better.😠
"I dont know if she paid for her stuff or not." So, he admitted it. How do they not understand that the burden of proof is on THE STORE to prove that she DID steal and not on her to prove she DIDN'T!
its horrifying.
Because America is authoritarian. Our national motto for policing is "just comply, and if you did nothing wrong then you can win in court", despite everyone knowing the court system is broken too. It really is just the way things work here, do as your told. I don't think it matters to him whether he's legally in the right or not. He may very well know he's wrong and just not care.
Of course he admitted it. It was the truth. That is why he was investigating the claim and asking for her receipt. The store made the accusation, but he's the one who is profiling?
Why do people believe they have a right to refuse to show a receipt? Like who lied to them and told them this?
@@Froward_Thinker People absolutely have a right to refuse to show a receipt. Like I said, the burden of proof is on the ACCUSER to PROVE she stole something. It's not up to HER to prove she didn't.
It really would have been easier to call his supervisor, but he would rather take her in front of kids. Shame on this officer. He escalated this far beyond any risk.
She is trying to show him how to do a proper investigation and he refuses to learn.
"I can't prove you didn't take anything." Ok, but can you prove she DID steal something?
Innocent until proven guilty is the biggest illusion in this country. It's a phrase that's merely spoken but never practiced, especially by police.
Then he tries to ID her so he can see if she has any warrants or something to arrest her for. These cops don’t give a damn about right/wrong or guilty/innocent. All they care about is bringing someone in on a charge.
This is the fundamental issue we have with the police and why reform is needed. They are not here to protect us or keep us safe. They are only here to bully and push us around.
People saw her leaving with stuff? Is that enough "probable cause"?
@@tigera6 Should you lose your freedom *just because someone else THINKS you did something wrong?*
@@tigera6 she’s leaving with stuff from a grocery store where everyone leaves with stuff. Assuming someone stole something is ridiculous.
She needs to sue the store as well.
She sued and settled with the store
I love how she offered to go inside to watch the security footage with the officer and he declines only to go on to ask about checking them after the arrest
What a weird thing to say “ you won’t show me your ID so I don’t know if you stole” 🤷🏻♂️ what?
I'm glad she stood her ground
next time she will get shot= and she can stand her ground....( either she runs the show or the police) ????????????????
She should’ve been allowed to defend herself with deadly force against that weirdo kidnapping a old women.
Yeah. We'd all be living in 1984 if she saved herself the trouble and showed her receipt.
The fact that they can purge the details of complaints after 5 years is straight up villainous. They could have a complaint accusing him of hiding bodies for the mafia and the police department will just say "derp! Guess we just don't know for sure."
If you received, and rightly deserved, a traffic ticket (speeding, reckless or careless driving etc) 5 or more years ago, should your insurance company still be allowed to hold that against you?
Obviously, this is not a case of “few and far between” complaints filed against this officer, and I suspect the nature of the complaints will affect how long the complaints remain actively on his records.
Ridiculous! What other job does this? People want to be cops because they have unlimited power and they know it.
@@tanya5322 uhm, if I excessively beat up an innocent person then yes it should be help against me. Tf kind of comparison is this loll
@@tanya5322 huh? they do. You get points on your DL they don't just go away. Can you get 25 complaints at your job?
Well shit your right that's like if I came up to you never known you and said you shot up a school I don't know so you did it to
This was a good one thanks for posting.
I hope Publix is sued for falsely accusing someone of a crime. I also hope the cop loses his job for complete incompetence.
I can't believe the cop said on camera "I don't know if she stole anything or not."
He didnt know she was being accused and he asked for a receipt
He admitted he had no pc of a crime to arrest in that statement alone.....The employee stated they had NOT SEEN HER pAY.....They did not say they had seen her steal....BIG DIFFERENCE......
Dude has a history of similar complaints, laughs at the idea of profiling, then says they have a right to profile people, dude was laughing after the taser, and has been cleared of similar shit in the past... dude knew more or less he was gonna get away with it.
He was dealing with a thug. How would you have handled it better?
@@ryanblanchard2508 I would never be a cop in the first place as it takes a special kind of mentality, and resilience to be that way, and have the correct training, that I recognize not everybody is cut out for, including this man. Instead of your whataboutisms, just see where they went wrong, and we can all learn from this.
It's almost like... if you work in an area that's 90% the same type of people, that 90% of your interactions will be with those people.... hmmmmm... How do statistics and population demographics work again? Some race baiting idiot around where I used to live tried to pull the same shit... '75% of the people X county pulls over in this neighborhood are black!'.... Well, 'this neighborhood' was like 85% black, so, statistically, they were underrepresented..... IOW, they needed to pull over MORE black people, if they were going by the numbers....
@@robertthompson5084 I love how you isolate on that one fact, therefore that justifies his behavior when it has been explained he went above and beyond, into an escalation that led to an unnecessary use of force and arrest. That behavior would not be tolerated of any person, white or black or any other person. Just because a person shoots off their mouth, is not justification for to use force and incarcerate them.
@@ryanblanchard2508 the cop had no right to even ask her, let alone assault her as her successful lawsuit will attest
Good for her standing up for her rights
Sue the store manager. Store and the security guard!
Unless they have evidence of theft, you need not show your receipt. The worst they can do is ban you from the store.
you never need to show receipt. retailers, especially large corporate chains, have everything on video and likely in store loss prevention - smart ones even have fairly strict requirements before even accusing anyone of theft, knowing this kind of scenario likely and their enterprise being held liable in lawsuits. i'm amazed at how well lemmings queue up for receipt checks on the way out the door, those people are the worst = shop with the morons, wait in line to checkout, then wait in line to exit? gtfoutta here - go check the cameras jajajajaaaaa
After I pay for everything and you still ask for receipt that's a no. After I swipe my card or cash. All of that now belongs to me. I need not show you a damn thing. It no longer belongs to the retailer. It belongs to me.
@@krizpy99onwax39 agreed but the problem is, they can trespass you from the store and you cant shop there anymore.
Walmart doesn't show me proof they purchased that merchandise. Imagine if they did. Everybody would be bargaining complaining about how cheap they got it and for what they're selling it to you for.
Not in KCMO
the way he kept trying to touch her creeped me the hell out.
Yeah, that was weird.
His whole spectrum of behavior is definitely rapist mentality.
Trying to calm someone down by touching them is the complete opposite.
If you had said this was a security guard who did this, I wouldn't have been shocked. This is ridiculous.
I was uncomfortable with the officer reaching in and touching on the lady while he talked to her in a very condescending tone. NO way I would show him anything either.
You missed a grade. The Internal Affairs Department also deserves a "F". Apparently, no one in the Jacksonville Sheriff's Department understands the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty.
They never find issue with the cops here. They're a whole brute squad.
More like an F-
This is why many police forces are called gangs/mafia/etc.
Internal Affairs needs to be abolished and replaced by a citizen review board
Innocent until proven guilty is a phrase that applies to the courtroom, not the street. A police officer can arrest anyone for just about anything. That doesn’t mean he is right, but it is within his authority. Imagine if an officer approached a suspected bank robber and said I need to detain you a moment and figure out if you committed a crime, but the suspect says “I didn’t do it” so the officer just has to let him walk away.
He wanted to review the store tape, caught himself almost asking about it, and turned off his body cam.
Turning off body cam is in itself a true punishable crime (as far as i remember).
@@someguy7629 its not
@@emergensiexit Then it should be.
@@emergensiexit if DAs would actually do their fuckin job it would be. That's tampering/removal of evidence.
@@someguy7629 in some states it ia a fireable offense.
Instead of resisting. Get out the car, refuse to provide a receipt and say” arrest me”. Then sue the store
I'm with her 100% for not showing her receipt.
She filed a lawsuit and lost. Also Her lawyer argued she lost her job over this. Justice was served
I work in loss prevention and everything this guy did was way out of line. You have to have evidence before you approach somebody you believe to be committing a crime (theft/shoplifting). You can never go off of just suspicion. This guy should not be a cop. He even acknowledged in the aftermath of tasing her that he didn't know if she paid or not. Completely inappropriate behavior on his part.
All because the cops ego got bruised.
So walking out of the store with items and not going through the cash register is not more then suspicion?
He has gotten away with this type of behavior for a long time, THIS was not the day he was going to change.
Innocent until proven black?
Proabably everyone is guilty. Even proving innocense wont be good enough
@@tomw7647 you ever walked into a store with a bottle of drink you purchased at a different store and not had a reciept?
If so, youre a criminal
What does her id have to do with anything? Also she mentioned going into the store and the cop denied it. The cameras would’ve solved everything but he assumed she was guilty with zero proof.
Because I wasn't his idea and that hurt his ego.
thats not entirely accurate. the cop had probable cause to investigate her due to the phone call and not producing the receipt, which would have solved this instantly and not even require her producing an ID. but since she didnt produce the receipt it made her look even more suspicious then originally because shes clearly reguarded. i think the use of that taser was both reasonable and enccesary. i was tired of hearing that women screech. too bad it didint make her shut up.
funniest thing is how many times ive walked straight out of a store without paying and this has NEVER happened to me. ive had a couple employees spot me over the years, but never even said anything. and i was always long gone before anyone had time to get there. assuming the cops were even called. it honestly boggles my mind that this actually happens to people,,, grocery stores, home depots, walmarts. god dam. the day the cops pull up im not even going to fuss. my tuime will be up.
He didn't assume anything. He was responding to the store telling him she didn't have a receipt.
@@ponetastic too bad you are entirely incorrect. She had no reason to legally show her receipt. The cop should’ve taken it up with the store. Not accuse her and tase her. READ THE LAW
@@ponetastic how wrong can you be?
This power hungry officer CONTINUALLY repeats "You're GOIN TO JAIL", MANY, MANY TIMES OVER. This guy has issues....
That was sickening the way the cop threatened to make her life far harder by getting some sort of child service involved.
A lot of them resort to all sorts of sick head games. It's gross the amount of low life filth that's tasked with policing our streets.
There's no threat worse than telling someone the government will take care of their children.
Woman involve children and the law to take children away from their fathers everyday for selfish sickening reasons
actually it's policy...child services must be called...what's commonly done however are cops being nice and letting relatives take children...
@@ywe3 what’s policy? What happened where policy would be taken into action. She didn’t break the law…there was no policy being acted on. The cop used it as a threat
She was literally assumed to be guilty, my house and fridge are full of shit I never had to prove I bought. Imagine a cop pulling you over and asking for the receipt for the clothes your wearing or to see the title to your car, or the lease for your apartment. He assumed she was a thief because somebody vaguely suggested she might be. Absolutely ridiculous, good for her for standing up to him but I really wish she didn't have to.
@@sparkyUSA1976 I've seen it. It was crazy. Wasn't he an attorney? He was totally cooperative, argued with them a little because after he identified they ran his name. That pissed them off so then to show they are Alpha Cops they said he had to prove he had rights to use the dumpster. Literal garbage cops.
@@sparkyUSA1976 LOL I saw that one too. It amazes each time how little cops know about the law. What doesn't surprise me is how cops are getting such a crappy name for themselves these days. People used to like having cops because they could feel safe that they were doing their jobs. Nowadays most people want to defund the police... Not quite sure why we would want to defund the police considering how AMAZINGLY they handle things
She literally had a piece of white paper she could have handed to him, shown the date and logo of the store, and would have drove off in seconds later. No, she wasn't legally obligated but she was accused of a crime and had the ability to dispel suspicion in literally moments. She opted in to be combative and argumentative every step of the way.
Imagine if she was on your property and in possession of stuff from your fridge. She wasn't on her property, she was on the private property of someone else and they had every right to ask her for evidence that she purchased the products.
@@XxNightmare128xX She gave an alternative of re entering with the officer and looking at the cameras but he refused.
My Ex and the father of my only child has been a police officer since our 20's and has offend has many police officers do, work OFF DUTY to make financial ends meet anyway, security officers may carrier fire arms but, they don't have the training of police officers in fact, their jurisdiction is within the establishment which they work. YES they can follow a suspect throughout the store and contain them when attempt to leave BUT THEY HAVE TO CALL THE POLICE OF THAT JUSDICTION TO ACTUALLY ARREST THEM, THEY HAVE NO ATHORITY TO DO SO THEY HAVE TO CALL THE REAL POLICE TO EFFECT THE ARREST. Now you have an off duty police officer working as security at a grocery store, he knows the law and is held at higher standards because he KNOWS THE LAW but what does he do, he accosted this woman in her car in the parking lot and demands she show her receipt because she STOLE. OK, SHE repeatedly stated I don't steal, let go back into the store and talk to employee that checked me out and the video which would confirm my ACTIONS , I don't steal!!! The off duty police officer TEASED HER FOR NOT SHOWING HER RECEIPT FOR HER PURCHASES BEFORE HE CALLED THE ON DUTY POLICE OFFICERS, SERIOUSLY!!! She had the receipt for her purchases and yet this off duty police officer indangered her life put the children is was responsible for at the time and she had to rely on those children to call her and family to let them know where she was, SERIOUSLY, WHAT IS WRONG WITH OUR SYSTEM???? How long did that take??? How many REAL CRIMINALS WERE PERPETRATING DURING THAT TIME? That's a RHETORICAL QUESTION. The off duty police officer abused his authority as store surety guard and finally dragged this woman out of car then teased her when her arms were at side then called 911 when she was on the ground because she refused to show him her receipt for her purchases. Thank God he didn't pull his police issue firearm!!!
when she called him a bald turkey 😂😂😂😂
Lol. "His actions have been cleared by his partner and good buddy who spends weekends with him grilling and fishing."