Mikhail Tal vs Vasily Smyslov - 1959 Candidates Chess Tournament
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ค. 2014
- Mikhail Tal employs the Closed Breyer variation against Vasily Smyslov's Caro-Kann Defense. Do not however be detracted by the word 'closed', as the position by move 7 is anything but. A tactical and dynamic position quickly arises where an emphasis on time/development, move order details, and precise calculation are paramount. The 1959 Candidates Tournament was held in three cities of Yugoslavia. The first 14 rounds were played in Bled, rounds 15-21 in Zagreb, and rounds 22-28 in Belgrade. This was game 30 from round 8 between Tal and Smyslov.
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ GOOGLE+ google.com/+ChessNetwork
★ LIVESTREAM / chessnetwork
Internet Chess Club (ICC)
chessclub.com
A gem from 1959 between Tal and Smyslov.
Thank you in advance for any +1's/likes/shares.
Enjoy..
Thank you! Nobody does this better.
Great commentary as always. I love watching these videos during breakfast. Thank you Jerry!
Tal was something else, he was just on another level, he was seeing chess like nobody ever, every game of him is art.
YES! keep the Tal coming. (ps. i feel like its been ages since you've done a historical game glad to see this though)
These reviews of games are my favorite thing to watch ever. And of my favorite thing to watch ever, Tal games are my favoritest.
The magician from Riga ..great always !!
jerry u are awesome u are one of my top ten favorite people on earth ive never disliked a single one if your videos keep rocking dude
Connie Goodman Thanks Connie. Glad you enjoy the videos.
Awesome i love watching your vids:) Keep up the great work !!!
Wow, you can't help but smile when watching Tal play
This was a fantastic video to learn from. Thanks for the upload Jerry, very informative.
Great and thanks Hex :)
Thanks Jerry this content is amazing!
Thanks for the coverage jerry
Thank you Jerry! I really like these reviews.
Love your analyses and observations.
Ive seen this game before but still very cool, thanks jerry!
Thanks for the great game
great work
fantastic video
great video, truly instructive!
Henning Wrage Thanks Henning.
Very interesting alternative Caro Opening variation. Led to even more interesting continuations.
Other than Magnus Carlsen vs Fabiano Caruana - 2nd Sinquefield Cup 2014, this is my favorite commentary of yours. Thanks for all the games!
Hello, thanks for the video
Yes I love Tal. Can we have some more Tal videos please :)?
Why Can't I Think Of A Name? matojelic Chanel ils the best
I would have gone wrong a million times.
Thank you really informative.
Tal WAS amazing!
Tal is the best! Please do more Tal videos!
Liked and +1'd like always. Thanks Jerry!
as always, thank you, as always +like, and as always, you're the best teacher I have ever had(and i'm including my school teachers in this ranking).
Nice compliment. Thanks martín.
I am not into chess, but you are making it very interessting, keep it up.
Cool! :)
Awesome analysis! Can you do more Tal videos? :D
Always excellent.
Wow.
10 games for the price of one from Jerry.
Very entertaining.
Brilliant analysis.
Great game! Tal was always my favorite after my Fischer blind infatuation. [Smyslov - and Tiamanov - I appreciate because they were both professional musicians along with being great Grandmasters]. Tal overcame so much. This convinces me to try d3. Thank you Jerry!
Welcome Billy. :)
Great game & analysis. Tal was always exciting, & Smyslov solid.
And now I am going to watch this video. Even before watching, I know it is going to be fantastic analysis...
Thank you Timur.
Poor Smyslov. Tal really put the pressure on him and didn't let him breath for a second. I love watching his games, such beautiful tactics.
We still learn great lessons from the past ,and this game proves it :)
Tal is my fav GM :) his tactical shots are incredible
Thanks for explaining how the pawn push gets stopped near the start. So often I see moves like this that I know shouldn't work but I don't know how to stop them
Welcome :)
At 19:00 I believe you showed the Morphy line of attack giving away the knight and rook for a quick devastating cm Morphy he understood materialistic greed in chess
That's gold, Jerry! Gold! ;)
Hi Jerry. Could you explain why Smyslov prefers Qa6 as opposed to Qb6 on move 12? His move seems awkward. Queen moving to b7 isn't feasible with the knight and prevents the bishop from going there, whereas Qb6 doesn't seem to have any glaring weaknesses. Double pawn doesn't seem bad if he takes, nor NxQ and Qb6 allows black's queen to stay on the black diagonal which is better.
Qa6 blocks in his a-pawn, prevents light bishop movement and doesn't appear to accomplish anything aside from maintaining pressure on a2 which has no practical importance.
Sean C I m wondering the same, but maybe just 13. NxBc8 and black doesn t want to let white plays a favourable endgame with the Bishop pair...
More tal please.
What a splendid game!
I have a follow up question for you ChessNetwork , At 15:57, what if after ...Nf6 then following up with Qxh7+ Nxh7 and now grabbing the black queen with Rxa1.? Is that any better for the white side?
Thanks! I don't think so. I think it's worse since after Qxh7+ Nxh7 Rxa1 there is NxN NxN and Rxf+
16:55 Ruck E8 seems good to me, or do I then miss something really important..?
what happens if, after b5, white plays Bxf7, and only after king move, Bd2?
Another reason why Tal is my favorite attacking grandmaster ever! I have no idea how he sees these attacking tactics
What Is the analyse board that you use? i cant seem to find this exact one
I believe it is ICC's Blitzin or Dasher
Smyslov left a glass of whisky 'en prise' and Tal took it 'en passant'
On 16:36, what about Rxd8 immediately? the 2 immediate forced replies are Ne8 and Rxd8.
If ..Rxd8, then Qxf7 and I don't see a good reply.
If ..Ne8 then just Rxe8 and Rxe8 is forced to delay the mate (I think).
EDIT: Nevermind, On 16:36, after Rxd8, ..Rxd8, Qxf7, Ne8 defends the g7 mate threat and threatens mate as well. Black has more counter-play than I thought.
Well analysed! White could even play Queen capturing knight and winning more quickly instead of knight capturing pawn in the analysis!
was there any time constraints on this match. sorry for being oblivious
It's a game from the candidates tournament so i'm sure that there was time control. Probably the standard time for FIDE major events. Roughly 4 hours for the entire game.
Smyslov should exchange Queen for Rook at 17:19, then capture Tal's Queen and go for end game.
"Hi, this is MATO.. today I'll show you a bea..." oh no wrong channel srry
Hello everyone! Oops ...
I look up to Smyslov as the most regular player of the first rank.
Hi jerry, its everyone
What if 6 ... F5 7.Kg5 and black plays h6 (instead of e4)
3.-e5 was risky. The game opens up too fast.
Could smyslov give up his queen for a rook with check and only then recapture tal's queen at 17.15?
Somebody : Wasn't rook × bishop better than Q × p at F 7 ?
What if
6. .... f5
7. Neg5 h6
and only then e4
18:20 black knight to B3, discovered check, picks up rook?
So it would seem. But if you look a little deeper, Black winds up down a whole rook in that variation: 30...Nb3+ 31.Nb6 Na1 32.Na8 Nc2+ (32...Ba8 33.Ra1) 33.Kd2 Ba8 34.Kc2
Finall tally: White has a rook and bishop, vs. Black's lone bishop.
like it thx
just got into chess…are u a GM or IM? very intuitive
NM lol
toTALly a bruTAL game! Tal at his best😄
The Wizard from Riga.It seemsz so logical... Wonder why I can;t find his moves. So Obvious and logical. I just am not logical.
first
n1