I just switched my Flywoo Explorer lr from Betaflight to Inav and I'm very happy with it. I fly slow cruise mostly anyway and the position hold works great. The OSD gui in Inav is much better and Inav also has mission planner.
It's interesting seeing the old issues of loss of alt on movement ect. I remember doing a lot of work with DJI on this on their car number drones and today they have largely made this a thing of the past. Flying dead straight and keeping altitude in flight was always key issues. It's funny these things come back up again many years later as betaflightn starts it's journey on these modes. Looking good though. Pleased these are coming.
The one reason why I moved from betaflight to inav when started to learn fly, because betaflight did not have alt hold mode. In github was said that developers against it at all and do not want to implement it:) I really surprised to hear that it will be added :)
there is a GPS Rescue. Otherwise, you want "Land" I think. That can put you into Angle Mode and lower the quad safely with a properly set throttle value (slow descent). You would not want ALT HOLD with just Angle Mode (no POS HOLD) as it would drift off due to not being perfectly level or wind.
Use this build option in 4.6dev, then set failsafe to land. With this configuration the drone will alt hold when failsafe and then will descend at 1 m/s (or whatever is set for the new CLI parameter). Ctzsnooze was testing this, read the pr (the comments especially since idk if this is documented at the top of the PR)!
I would love to see more INAV like features available in BetaFlight. I tried INAV awhile back and had tuning issues that made me give up and go back to BetaFlight. With the new build system, I could see BetaFlight being expanded in ways that might require H7 processor processors with more storage to run all the new features together but that would still leave older processors usable. We might finally have a good reason to buy H7.
I was thinking they had a position hold available in 4.6 but don't see it yet. Is it coming out did I miss something? About to test my first GPS quad and don't want to flip to Inav something I've never used.
Is there any possibility that BF 4.6 or later at least will support optical flow and range finder sensors (such as MTF-01 from MicoAir) instead of baro and gps to control althold and poshold modes? In your opinion of course :)
You're absolutely right, I flashed bf4.5 from Inav 7.1, and even on defaults the jitter in the camera was gone in the same craft. However for gps Inav is still more tested and reliable - the way it slows to a poshold and ascend is much preferred. for whatever reason Bf still has sanity checks by default which is a huge risk for long range.
is there a way to combine altitude hold and horizon mode. I want to make a line of sight trick drone with this whoop board it has an onboard barometer that i've never used.
When I started tuning my own quads I started with betaflight and I tried inav on a couple of my quads and didn't like the preformance I was getting. It seem to me that inav wasn't as refined as betaflight. Maybe I didn't give it a proper chance? It just every time I messed around with inav I was never happy with the results I got. Who knows???
gps altitude from what I recall isn't very accurate, and barometric seems to be better. Do either Inav or Betaflight have the ability to adjust the mix of gps / barometric data that's used as inputs?
I thought there was an altitude hold like a while back. I'm on bf 4.3 on a quad and went to set it up and here I am. What happened to that feature in the past. And now guess I have to update the fc to get it again? Ugh
Thanks, Mark. Hey, I wanted to tell you that you were right - it is (apparently) quite "rude" to rip my 5-9" 8S quads around the neighborhood. They got together and sent an emissary to let me know that their moral has bottomed out due to my "hobby"... I was like, "Oh, I thought everyone loved seeing my robotic aircraft ripping 80-115 mph right over their treeline..." What a bunch of wussies, huh?
My neighbors love my 6s drone 😂 they're always coming over and asking "what's that screaming noise we keep hearing?" Anyone who's seen my drone has been impressed
@@serenestateofbeing1062 Yeah, weird - mine hate everything about it... sign 'o the times, I guess. Everyone's dumbed down and emotional and afraid of everything.
@mlentsch i fly at my parents house and they got 5 acres which probably helps. that sucks though man, everyone is different i guess. Have you tried out the fpv cycle 3s tp3? Or the 1s version, the babytooth, is even quieter. Quietest drone i own are those toothpicks. The 3s version is really fun and definitely way quieter than your 8s quad 😂😂
@@serenestateofbeing1062 I have a 6S 3.5" that's probably the best flying quad that I have, but still a bit loud... I fly my walksnail betafpv 2s whoop which is fun, but... you know - I have the need 4 speed! I wonder how they'll like my winter build when it's complete... 11" geprc pulsar, 12S - should draw between 8-9 kW. LOL!!!!
Very interesting, do you think that position hold will be added in BetaFlight in one year ? I hope that RTH in BetaFlight will also become very reliable.
@@uavtech But we also have to thank the original author of alt hold: "bakwc". He left and closed the PR before it was finalized because ctzsnooze can be irritating at times. ctzsnooze then copied the PR and simplified it
@@uavtech bakwc was the one who originally coded this up. ctzsnooze copied the pull request and modified it after bakwc quit before alt hold was finalized.
Oh gosh - when I started learning to fly FPV, there was nothing I wanted more than alt hold and pos hold. But now - and keep in mind that I do not do long range cruising - I cannot think of a scenario where I might find alt hold useful. Or fun.
I just switched my Flywoo Explorer lr from Betaflight to Inav and I'm very happy with it. I fly slow cruise mostly anyway and the position hold works great. The OSD gui in Inav is much better and Inav also has mission planner.
It's interesting seeing the old issues of loss of alt on movement ect. I remember doing a lot of work with DJI on this on their car number drones and today they have largely made this a thing of the past. Flying dead straight and keeping altitude in flight was always key issues. It's funny these things come back up again many years later as betaflightn starts it's journey on these modes.
Looking good though. Pleased these are coming.
@6:00 Betaflight will also alt hold using ONLY positioning data from an m10 gnss module! No baro needed!
Might need your help to set this up!
INAV can do that. And also - not using Baro alone is not a benefit. Benefits comes from customization.
The one reason why I moved from betaflight to inav when started to learn fly, because betaflight did not have alt hold mode. In github was said that developers against it at all and do not want to implement it:)
I really surprised to hear that it will be added :)
Hope they will add AltHold instead of Drop feature at failsafe. Thanks for great video!
there is a GPS Rescue.
Otherwise, you want "Land" I think. That can put you into Angle Mode and lower the quad safely with a properly set throttle value (slow descent). You would not want ALT HOLD with just Angle Mode (no POS HOLD) as it would drift off due to not being perfectly level or wind.
Use this build option in 4.6dev, then set failsafe to land. With this configuration the drone will alt hold when failsafe and then will descend at 1 m/s (or whatever is set for the new CLI parameter). Ctzsnooze was testing this, read the pr (the comments especially since idk if this is documented at the top of the PR)!
@@uavtechnew alt hold code replaces old land failsafe mode with a more controlled altitude managed descent. It's in the pr by ctzsnooze
Thanks for that video helped me out a great deal on a hybrid build with walksnail and Anolog thermal mix.
I would love to see more INAV like features available in BetaFlight. I tried INAV awhile back and had tuning issues that made me give up and go back to BetaFlight. With the new build system, I could see BetaFlight being expanded in ways that might require H7 processor processors with more storage to run all the new features together but that would still leave older processors usable. We might finally have a good reason to buy H7.
bro came outta nowhere and is like the new bardwell
Thanks for all the info and tips, Mark! 😃
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
I was thinking they had a position hold available in 4.6 but don't see it yet. Is it coming out did I miss something? About to test my first GPS quad and don't want to flip to Inav something I've never used.
Is there any possibility that BF 4.6 or later at least will support optical flow and range finder sensors (such as MTF-01 from MicoAir) instead of baro and gps to control althold and poshold modes? In your opinion of course :)
I ❤ your BF videos 🌱
Does only Alt Hold is coming? I thought also Pos Hold is coming.
It's strange for me to see Altitude Hold Mode even on 4.5.1 in the old configurator. Is it safe to try it on 4.5.1?
You're absolutely right, I flashed bf4.5 from Inav 7.1, and even on defaults the jitter in the camera was gone in the same craft. However for gps Inav is still more tested and reliable - the way it slows to a poshold and ascend is much preferred. for whatever reason Bf still has sanity checks by default which is a huge risk for long range.
yup
is there a way to combine altitude hold and horizon mode. I want to make a line of sight trick drone with this whoop board it has an onboard barometer that i've never used.
When I started tuning my own quads I started with betaflight and I tried inav on a couple of my quads and didn't like the preformance I was getting. It seem to me that inav wasn't as refined as betaflight. Maybe I didn't give it a proper chance? It just every time I messed around with inav I was never happy with the results I got. Who knows???
gps altitude from what I recall isn't very accurate, and barometric seems to be better. Do either Inav or Betaflight have the ability to adjust the mix of gps / barometric data that's used as inputs?
yes, both do.
I thought there was an altitude hold like a while back. I'm on bf 4.3 on a quad and went to set it up and here I am. What happened to that feature in the past. And now guess I have to update the fc to get it again? Ugh
I don't use a GPS but want to have the hold feature and know I don't it a long time ago.
Thanks, Mark. Hey, I wanted to tell you that you were right - it is (apparently) quite "rude" to rip my 5-9" 8S quads around the neighborhood. They got together and sent an emissary to let me know that their moral has bottomed out due to my "hobby"... I was like, "Oh, I thought everyone loved seeing my robotic aircraft ripping 80-115 mph right over their treeline..." What a bunch of wussies, huh?
My neighbors love my 6s drone 😂 they're always coming over and asking "what's that screaming noise we keep hearing?" Anyone who's seen my drone has been impressed
@@serenestateofbeing1062 Yeah, weird - mine hate everything about it... sign 'o the times, I guess. Everyone's dumbed down and emotional and afraid of everything.
@mlentsch i fly at my parents house and they got 5 acres which probably helps. that sucks though man, everyone is different i guess. Have you tried out the fpv cycle 3s tp3? Or the 1s version, the babytooth, is even quieter. Quietest drone i own are those toothpicks. The 3s version is really fun and definitely way quieter than your 8s quad 😂😂
@@serenestateofbeing1062 I have a 6S 3.5" that's probably the best flying quad that I have, but still a bit loud... I fly my walksnail betafpv 2s whoop which is fun, but... you know - I have the need 4 speed!
I wonder how they'll like my winter build when it's complete... 11" geprc pulsar, 12S - should draw between 8-9 kW. LOL!!!!
@mlentsch same I love going fast. It completely changed my addiction for fast cars into an addiction of fast drones. And omg dude 😂😂
Very interesting, do you think that position hold will be added in BetaFlight in one year ?
I hope that RTH in BetaFlight will also become very reliable.
It all comes down to an individual coding this up. Example: for ALT HOLD we have Chris Thompson to thank (handle: CTZSnooze).
@@uavtech But we also have to thank the original author of alt hold: "bakwc". He left and closed the PR before it was finalized because ctzsnooze can be irritating at times. ctzsnooze then copied the PR and simplified it
@@uavtech bakwc was the one who originally coded this up. ctzsnooze copied the pull request and modified it after bakwc quit before alt hold was finalized.
Thanks. I did not see that!
Oh gosh - when I started learning to fly FPV, there was nothing I wanted more than alt hold and pos hold. But now - and keep in mind that I do not do long range cruising - I cannot think of a scenario where I might find alt hold useful. Or fun.
Look forward to update to 4.6 to test it out 👍👍👍🫡🫡🫡