Quartz64 Model A - PCIe & SATA SBC

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ค. 2024
  • Quartz64 Model A single board computer review and demo, including running Manjaro with a MATE desktop, and testing the board’s PCIe slot and SATA port.
    The Quartz64 and accessories shown in this video were purchased from Pine64, where you can find out more about the board here: www.pine64.org/quartz64a/ -- and also on its Wiki pages here: wiki.pine64.org/wiki/Quartz64
    My previous video in which I connected the SATA PCIe card to the RockPro64 and ran OpenMediaVault is here:
    • ROCKPro64 PCIe SATA Card
    And my initial review of the RockPro64 is here:
    • ROCKPro64 SBC with PCI...
    More videos on SBCs and wider computing and related topics can be found at / explainingcomputers
    And you can access exclusive members-only videos and other perks by becoming a channel member here: / @explainingcomputers
    You may also like my ExplainingTheFuture channel at: / explainingthefuture
    Chapters:
    00:00 Introduction
    00:48 Unboxing
    03:59 Specifications
    07:58 Manjaro
    10:43 SATA Port
    12:08 PCIe Slot
    14:16 More Tests
    16:03 Wrap
    #Quartz64 #Pine64 #PCIe #ExplainingComputers
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 485

  • @GooogleGoglee
    @GooogleGoglee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    A new video? "... Let me go take A CLOSER LOOK"

    • @FunIsGoingOn
      @FunIsGoingOn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This! 😂

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      :)

    •  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      New? Old too! Let me goa closer look entire channel

  • @bradw256
    @bradw256 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Bummer. I'm sure it's frustrating to deal with a board that has so much unrealized potential. However, I appreciate the fact that you are willing to do the testing to save the rest of us the headaches. Thank you.

    • @Grandwigg
      @Grandwigg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This. Very much. I'm so glad he makes it so easy to figure out what SBCs are available and get a good handle on capabilities.

    • @kek777pasj
      @kek777pasj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i'm pretty sure this SBC th-cam.com/video/lsfE83wIjko/w-d-xo.html VIM4 is the only one SBC that can play TH-cam in browser without frame drops (even, as it was shown on video, via XWayland), without HW decoding/rendering but still.

    • @wayland7150
      @wayland7150 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Get Geoff Gearling to recompile the kernel.

  • @valentin_4028
    @valentin_4028 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a couple of people mentioned on Channel Update July 2022, It is enjoyable to watch your videos on Sunday morning.

  • @MarcusPHagen
    @MarcusPHagen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I saw an article on the Quartz64 A last week. It started with a headline about the board being in stock & available. Nothing was mentioned about the lack of mature software!
    Thanks, Chris, for saving me from spending $100+ & hours of frustration. Your SBC reviews are an oasis of useful information in the ocean of vapid commercial hype.

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Thanks Marcus. One of the things I've learnt in the past few years is that many articles in the computing press are minor re-writes of press releases. Even some "reviews" repeat that the manufactuter says in their literature . . .

    • @MarcusPHagen
      @MarcusPHagen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ExplainingComputers Very true! That's why thorough reviews like this have become a "must have" step in my pre-purchase research. I've been burned too often by enthusiastic writeups & TH-cam shills.

  • @skf957
    @skf957 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Makes me appreciate even more the work and support from the Rpi foundation.

  • @cheesyboofs
    @cheesyboofs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    To say that this was a generous review is an understatement Chris. I'm not so sure the rest of us would be as kind over a year on from such a purchase and it is still not fully functional. Keep up the great work.

  • @AndrewAHayes
    @AndrewAHayes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    This had so much potential but has been IMO neglected by the programmers at Pine, to not have a fully working desktop over a year after launch is unheard of, maybe they should relaunch it as The Lemon Pi!

    • @alliejr
      @alliejr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      That's the secret sauce of Raspberry Pi-- software and long-term support.

    • @kyeongsushin3145
      @kyeongsushin3145 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      They intentionally release boards with immaturely supported (relatively new or obscure) chipsets, so as open-source enthusiasts can tinker with them and hopefully add mainline kernel supports to them in a relatively early time. Pine64 themselves don't really provide any software support to the devices (maybe a basic BSP boot image or two, and that's about it). While it is a bit doubious business model, they are welcomed by open-source communities because some boards are better than no board.
      So, you really should not buy random boards from them unless you are okay with that. Some old boards (based on Allwinner A64, RK3399, etc) are pretty well-supported, but new board, not necessarily.

    • @RetroGameStream
      @RetroGameStream 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@PeterKropotkin42069 Gatekeepers are in every community. Use a computer however you want, that's kinda what Linux is about, right?

    • @AndrewAHayes
      @AndrewAHayes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@countorlock3148 Me too! I originally intalled a Red Hat version that came on a magazine CD ROM although I had dual boot as Red Hat was used as a learning tool only, luckily I leared CLI on my Amiga in the late'80s and the transition from Amiga CLI to Linux was easier because of this, Im no expert far from it but I do try to do things from CLI, its so fast! and the OS is lightening fast, back in my Amiga days we used to call Windows Windoze as 3.1 was so so slow LOL

    • @AndrewAHayes
      @AndrewAHayes ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PeterKropotkin42069 I wouldnt call my self a scrub but im neither an expert, i can acheive what I set out to do.

  • @PeterJasper
    @PeterJasper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Looks like the Quartz64 Model A is a SBC with potential, but lacks software support even one year after release. Thanks for another high quality review.

    • @StolenJoker84
      @StolenJoker84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I was thinking the same thing. Seems they released a whole lot of hardware features just for the sake of saying “We have this”. I know SBCs are for tinkering, but kinda useless to have hardware available that isn’t actually usable - like having 4 different video outputs on a device who’s own webpage says the software doesn’t support video output.

    • @mikavsn
      @mikavsn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      aggree like another pine64 board less software support

    • @StolenJoker84
      @StolenJoker84 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Tony Yeah, this isn’t likely for the average user. I just find it odd that even a year later, the official software is still in “beta” (basically) and lacks video support on a device that has 4 dedicated video outputs. But I do agree that for someone who has the knowledge and time to spend developing for the hardware, this isn’t likely as big of an issue.

  • @bertblankenstein3738
    @bertblankenstein3738 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    The appeal of the sata port had me excited, but what good is it if you can't use it (at least easily). Thank you for testing out this board, saves many of us the expense and headaches.

    • @setgeeks
      @setgeeks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why can't there be sub $50 sbc with a Sata port that works? It would make some serious money.

    • @bertblankenstein3738
      @bertblankenstein3738 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@setgeeks agreed, I think there are many of us that would like to use an SBC as a lan connected fileserver.

    • @jamesowens7148
      @jamesowens7148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@setgeeks It's called a thin client like fujitsu futro, HP Txxx or Dell WYSE

    • @ronaldglider
      @ronaldglider 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@setgeeks They have been around for a long time: take a look at the "Banana Pi"

    • @MarquisDeSang
      @MarquisDeSang 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's easy, simply write your own driver and do you own reverse engineering ; )

  • @deanstyles2567
    @deanstyles2567 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    What good is an SBC without working software? Honestly at this point I'd struggle to justify any ARM SBC not called Raspberry Pi if the maker's idea of software support is 'let the community do it for us'.
    Thanks for showing us all these SBCs 🙂

    • @AndrewAHayes
      @AndrewAHayes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      This attitude is becoming endemic to manufacturers in China, eg. Creality the 3D printer company does this with their Marlin firmware although you do get a printer that can only just produce a print but forget about the bed probing working correctly or any Marlin features after 2017

    • @SeverityOne
      @SeverityOne 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thanks for saving me the effort of writing exactly your comment. There appear to be very, very few, if any, SBCs with decent software support that aren't a Raspberry Pi.

    • @rpavlik1
      @rpavlik1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I mean, on some level that's actually the point of Pine64, they work to get open hardware out there and support the community building on it. Stuff like this can be really good for folks working on Linux development, prototyping for custom development, etc. Not all these boards have the same target market.

    • @repatch43
      @repatch43 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SeverityOne Very few? Are there any? Hell, I'd be happy with software that AT LEAST supports the features the board has!??!

    • @JoseEduardo-dg2ki
      @JoseEduardo-dg2ki ปีที่แล้ว

      No smooth DE = no software
      You are right in expecting a full experience after such a long time, but I think its excusable since its basically a community project.
      Buy the older module if you want a change, or a Raspberry pi if its that what yoy expect in the end of the day.

  • @TheBestRTaken005
    @TheBestRTaken005 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thanks for giving it your best shot and showing the good, the bad, the ugly... The raw data

  • @thighdude7
    @thighdude7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you for taking the time to test & share with us. Hopefully this board will mature and your next round of testing will show much better results....

  • @sbc_tinkerer
    @sbc_tinkerer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Been wondering about this board for quite a while. Thank you! And, at the risk of being pedantic, you spin 180 to get to the other end. 😉

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      So true! I got my angles wrong there. I'm so used to spinning 90.

    • @largepimping
      @largepimping 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ExplainingComputers I just assumed you were spinning it 90 deg twice...

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@largepimping :)

  • @tanaytole6514
    @tanaytole6514 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am getting addicted to the knowledge I recieve from your videos keep it up

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for watching. :)

    • @ronaldglider
      @ronaldglider ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ExplainingComputers EC will make sure you stay addicted!

  • @briankleinschmidt3664
    @briankleinschmidt3664 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A year is more than enough time to get things ironed out. You were very generous.

  • @joeg3950
    @joeg3950 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the video, Christopher. You have been kind to the manufacturer of this SBC. Your production quality and presentation skills are top notch!

  • @RoboNuggie
    @RoboNuggie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A very interesting board, thanks for testing it out!
    That keyboard - I bet it's older than a lot of your viewers 🙂 (AKHTER are still in business I believe which is cool)

  • @mikefinn2101
    @mikefinn2101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video waited one week for this, I will be waiting patiently for the next one always enjoy EC video I look forward to each and every one. Glad Peter is teaching all new and exciting new things and taking his time. He is so kind to do so. I can't thank you enough.

  • @NewAgeDIY
    @NewAgeDIY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks Chris. Interesting SBC with lots of potential
    Off topic. I understand that the UK is having a heat wave. Hope it’s cooler in your new studio. Stay safe! See you next Sunday!

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Greetings! We indeed about to have to very hot days (maybe 40C). The studio space was OK this afternoon. Maybe not tomorrow . . .

  • @rootpotato
    @rootpotato 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Not even a good doctor like yourself can save this patient . . . It has lots of showroom appeal, but let's face it, it's a flop in the cold light of day . . . Won't be rushing out and buying one of these!

  • @PinakiGupta82Appu
    @PinakiGupta82Appu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Authentic review. You put a lot of effort into making such videos. Pine64 has potential when used as a NAS or a personal GIT server by using GTEA or maybe it can also be utilised to host a personal website. But using it as a daily driver, that too, by hooking up so many wires will be a real challenge. It's not easy for someone like me. Pressed the Liked button as usual.

  • @TheGrisu486
    @TheGrisu486 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    and again a very good, very interesting video with lots of authentic information.
    I have to be careful not to immediately order the new, great SBC, which I actually don't need at all.
    The same procedure as last time ...

  • @SchoolforHackers
    @SchoolforHackers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like retro bits too, but I seriously like following SBC boards and development. Thanks Chris!

  • @Crabbyfeet
    @Crabbyfeet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Always loved these kinds of videos on a Sunday evening! Awesome video by the way.

  • @davidglenn6468
    @davidglenn6468 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for another interesting session & for testing this interesting looking SBC, before we wasted any money on it. I do hope this will improve in time & will be watching your channel for updates. Like you & others, I like the idea of this SBC, but it does look like we are a way off having a good working one! Keep up the good work Chris. Thx

  • @demonsty
    @demonsty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    starting my lazy sunday off with a great video from christopher. gonna be a good day!

  • @AMDRADEONRUBY
    @AMDRADEONRUBY 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice just what I needed for my Sunday a new video from you Christopher have a nice week

  • @jose.inestroza
    @jose.inestroza 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Similar to other boards, a SBC like this shows a tremendous potential to be unlocked over time with software updates, something not recommended for more mainstream products. This is the reason why it has a spotlight on this channel. Thanks Mr C.B.!

  • @donkink3114
    @donkink3114 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well done video as usual, with a very interesting sbc.

  • @edsteenhorst6484
    @edsteenhorst6484 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very esoteric. Thank you for sharing this. I hope that Pine finds money in their budgets, to continue software development to match the hardware.

  • @waynestewart1919
    @waynestewart1919 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweet SBC! I wish I could get my PinePhone to work as a reliable full-fledged SmartPhone. Thanks for being awesome! I'm sure it enjoyed the pep-talk.

  • @michaeljijus980
    @michaeljijus980 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr.Chris.
    You rock as always.
    ThanX for posting this!!!
    Enjoy your day!!!

  • @tonysheerness2427
    @tonysheerness2427 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You had the board for 1 year and the software is still in development, in the computing world 1 year is a life time and things move very fast. This board should never have been released.

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Your point is well made.

    • @tonysheerness2427
      @tonysheerness2427 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ExplainingComputers Raspberry PI because of its excellent software support is first choice for mission critical applications where reliability and free of software bugs are very important. Who would buy Pine if after 1 year its hardware is still not supported?

    • @bobwong8268
      @bobwong8268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, I was very excited and now a little...
      Thanks Chris, for showing us a status report on its development.

  • @tonytenbreock8546
    @tonytenbreock8546 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks for a review of this board. Sad that the Pine64 group can't get it together. To quote the late great coach Chris Schocor, "Potential is what you lose with."

  • @GiulianoMazzina
    @GiulianoMazzina 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As someone that was born in 1981 and watched computers come out that were large and heavy and seeing SBCs in 2022. I wish I was rich, I'd buy every one of them just to have them. Tiny computers are the best!

  • @Richardj410
    @Richardj410 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the info. I've always liked learning things on your channel.

  • @Reziac
    @Reziac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Veddy interesting, especially as I have a Pinephone that's more or less the same base unit. (I don't use it as a phone, but as a micro-portable, with the excellent Pine keyboard.) It runs Manjaro/KDE, and while programs are slow to load, once they get going performance is smooth enough. Will be pleased to see future developments for these Pine64 units.

  • @peterjansen4826
    @peterjansen4826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You know that somebody loves his keyboard and that it is durable when the originally white keycaps got yellow. I love it, Christopher. Nice keyboard for typing.

  • @garrockwaters304
    @garrockwaters304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for another excellent SBC video and thanks for saving me the money for NOT buying another POS Pine board!

  • @samtab1807
    @samtab1807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video loved it. Thank you. Happy Sunday

  • @monolofiminimal
    @monolofiminimal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    First and foremost, just wanted to give again my thanks for your hard work as always. I don't really have access to these things, so I experience the world of sbc's vicariously through you as proxy and value it greatly.
    I think on the side it'd be rather fun to be an sbc collector - though I would not let any of them idle :) would put them to work
    Videos like this are gold to me, because we are basically rife with choice when it comes to sbc, so when it comes to pitfalls, information like this are important factors. I await a "next gen" sbc to pop up by one of these many companies, so many possibilities in design and hardware, I'm sure the "bestest sbc's" are still a ways to come.

  • @player07441
    @player07441 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm not going to buy another sbc, I'm not going to buy another sbc. Ooooo a new explaining computer vid time to buy

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      :)

    • @Reziac
      @Reziac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm fairly sure Chris could use his collection for decorative wall tiles.
      Covering his entire wall.
      :D

  • @JeffGeerling
    @JeffGeerling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    03:24 I like the "SanDish" eMMC 🙂

  • @toxiccan175
    @toxiccan175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I’m hoping to use this board as a server. The extra Ram and the SATA slot make it a good contender as long as the headless software performs properly with good stability.

  • @chromerims
    @chromerims 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Glorious unboxing. Thank you.

  • @Bassotronics
    @Bassotronics 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing about boards that have certain issues is having fun trying to tackle the issues and even writing program code that can bypass the issue at hand temporarily while the company sorts out the official launch of the kernal or program for full compatibility.

  • @rmcdudmk212
    @rmcdudmk212 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like a cool little SBC. 👍

  • @rezamolaee8185
    @rezamolaee8185 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice review there Sir, Thank you.

  • @sunfoundermakereducation8590
    @sunfoundermakereducation8590 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video, thank you, Christopher.

  • @miguelagueda3928
    @miguelagueda3928 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The PCIe connection, despite what the physical connector might look like, is a PCIe 2.0x1, as is the only available PCIe provided by this chip. There's another chip from this family, the RK3568 that adds an additional 3.0x2 conection to the SoC.

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  ปีที่แล้ว

      The PCIe generation is indeed 2.0. But the physical slot type is x4. :)

  • @13soxs
    @13soxs ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bravo Chris, more good stuff.........

  • @BryanBenoit
    @BryanBenoit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another interesting video. Thanks Prof Barnatt!!!

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad to see Mr Scissors making his contribution! :)

  • @mummoorthy6511
    @mummoorthy6511 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for video support

  • @dfs-comedy
    @dfs-comedy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the SBC reviews... the bread and butter of this channel!
    This SBC looks like it could have had potential, but seems a bit half-baked. And SBC makers should have learned from the Raspberry Pi Foundation that top-notch software support is far more important to market share than fancy hardware.

  • @rorytruman
    @rorytruman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me too, I really liked the look of the original board so was excited to see this one. For me the interesting bit was gigabit LAN and PCIe with potential for a private router type arrangement. I was disappointed to hear you have had the board so long now Chris and bits like the SATA ports still are not supported in the recommended distro. Bonus marks for perseverance 😃

  • @PJ-om2wq
    @PJ-om2wq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mainline kernel support is going well on the quartz64, and they do have the advantage of being an open hardware design as well (you can download the schematics for the board). Personally I use the pgwipeout kernel with Debian bookworm on mine and it's rock solid stable. The only thing that I can't get working at the moment is the mipi-dsi LCD panel but I'm sure eventually it will work. If you buy one be sure to get a woodpecker serial adapter for console at the same time.

  • @KCYT2010
    @KCYT2010 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Useful info to know. Thanks !

  • @androth1502
    @androth1502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    that keyboard needs a visit to the 8-bit guy for a retrobright :)

  • @AraceaeFanatics
    @AraceaeFanatics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome, been looking forward to this one.

  • @mattybbg6850
    @mattybbg6850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the blue-tac SSD 'cradle' Christopher.

  • @alanthornton3530
    @alanthornton3530 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    An interesting SBC video on a Sunday afternoon @ E.C. It's a shame the software support isn't in place especially after having the board for a year. I've often wondered about the durability/longevity of SBC's with components soldered directly to the board, what's your thoughts on this? Looking forward to the next instalment :)

  • @skyak4493
    @skyak4493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the review. It is clear the performance is still potential. It does make me wonder about the model B -> does the M2 work and at what performance level? I am still looking for the perfect home server SBC.
    The pcie slot is exciting with it’s potential for a broad range of high speed functionality, but my opinion is that connectivity will be a long hard fight to realize.

  • @jls9225
    @jls9225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have a good weekend Christopher. As Always, Be Smart and Stay Safe.

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, you too!

    • @jls9225
      @jls9225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ExplainingComputers Your Welcome, Christopher

  • @brianwood5220
    @brianwood5220 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the video Chris. Your hard work is appreciated.

  • @ChrisHalden007
    @ChrisHalden007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. Thanks

  • @TeddehSpaghetti
    @TeddehSpaghetti 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I eyed this board, but ended up pre-ordering a Rock5 Model B. I'll need a m.2 breakout board to use a PCIe card, but the other hardware specs and AI processor in the Rock5 seem to be seriously upping the SBC game. It's exciting to imagine something using the NPU for a smart PiHole and enhanced ad-blocking, or building a firewall that uses the NPU for modifying rules on the fly.

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The Rock 5B will I think be an excellent board.

    • @TheRealNici
      @TheRealNici ปีที่แล้ว

      have fun not getting any of the NPU to work, since that relies on BSP linux with a proprietay userspace stack that needs a very specific userland

    • @rpavlik1
      @rpavlik1 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought there was some progress on getting open drivers for the npu on rockchip...

    • @TheRealNici
      @TheRealNici ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rpavlik1 no, there is nobody working on this as far as I'm aware, and being involved in RK3588 mainlining myself, I'm pretty well aware. Besides, the RK3566 on the Quartz64 would use the same driver.

  • @wasabigun
    @wasabigun ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video 🤓

  • @MrYungilike
    @MrYungilike 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Chris for this test, which is cool. I'm wondering whether or not a 10GigE and SFP+ PCIE card could work on this? And how about the iperf3 data of the 10 GigE.

  • @renobodyrenobody
    @renobodyrenobody 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Chris, I am in quarantine in Shanghai :/ Thanks for the video!

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry to hear that. I hope that the situation improves.

  • @loginregional
    @loginregional 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gotta love SBCs. One of these days...
    Don't be afraid to tweak the kernal. There's a conflict to squash!

  • @thewatcher5271
    @thewatcher5271 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I So Look Forward To Your Videos Every Sunday & This Time I Tend To Agree With The Commenter Below With The Wild Font. This SBC Is Just Lacking. I'm A Fan Of M.2 & SODIMMS But No SATA & USB 3 At The Same Time!?! I'm Like You Though, I Like The Name But The Proof Is In The Pudding. Isn't That What You Guys Call Kidney Pie? Have A Good Week! 8-)

  • @pavan13
    @pavan13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome Video

  • @Leezorc
    @Leezorc ปีที่แล้ว

    AS always great video.

  • @KAELHGC
    @KAELHGC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good video!! 🎥

  • @Dilson1327ify
    @Dilson1327ify 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good SBC.

  • @MrLosttheplot
    @MrLosttheplot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hi chris. ive bought some glasses so i can watch my computer screen comfortably. all you do is measure from nose to screen, and see a optician, they work

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Excellent! Glasses for computer/desk use do indeed make a lot of difference when you pass a certain age! I've worn them for about 10 years now.

  • @squelchstuff
    @squelchstuff 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I genuinely thought that Pine might have come up with, if not a serious challenger to the Raspberry Pi, but rather had carved a niche of its own with the connectivity options. It is such a shame that this hardware lacks the software support it so obviously needs.
    A very diplomatic summary there Chris, but thanks for your insights.

  • @wamy7619
    @wamy7619 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The other thought that crossed my mind besides not being supported by the OS is power issue.
    Still interesting concept to include those in an SBC.

  • @energymarketchile
    @energymarketchile ปีที่แล้ว

    Radxa Zero gives you much more for the same price level... Thanks for making this video. Greetings from Ottawa.

  • @yjk_ch
    @yjk_ch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the one of the real reasons why Raspberry Pi is successful is that they not only ship the finished hardware, but also finished software to the end user. And now I can see why it took years to ship an full 64-bit OS to Pis: They really cared about the software, and wanted to ensure that it works flawlessly.

  • @esra_erimez
    @esra_erimez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you happen to be planning on doing a review of the Mekotronics RK3588?

  • @nrnoble
    @nrnoble ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As always, an excellent script for the video. Clearly not just "winging" it, or if you are it's impossible to tell the difference... Overall, the software is still in the bleeding edge alpha category which is good to know before spending any money with higher expectations.

  • @Ibrahimdude
    @Ibrahimdude 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:53 I Do Love The "Open Sesame" Written On The Box Right Stanley
    He say Yes Chris.... Good Boy :)

  • @mattkilleen7174
    @mattkilleen7174 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What do you do with all these SBCs when you're finished reviewing them?

  • @repatch43
    @repatch43 ปีที่แล้ว

    All of these sorts of boards are ALWAYS so tempting, especially with how hard it is to get Pis right now. And then you find out the state of the supporting software and I just say 'no'. It's not worth farting around with what might be great hardware if the software is a trash heap. Thanks very much for reviewing this board. Maybe in 5 years it'll be worth looking at.

  • @yuhaz
    @yuhaz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great vid, thx!

  • @muddyexport5639
    @muddyexport5639 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks!

  • @YanFei-zi7mm
    @YanFei-zi7mm ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks - this is interesting.

  • @qg786
    @qg786 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a great looking SBC with great potential. I can see it as a cube shaped NAS box. With a big heatsink and fan. I'm in the process of creating a PiNAS drive (following your tutorial thank you) for the cctv I'm trying to set up. It's just that the Pi4's all seem to be out of stock lately. It's on back order so I'll have to wait. 😕

  • @oguzsavas1140
    @oguzsavas1140 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks.

  • @jimadams7765
    @jimadams7765 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    After all this time, I have only just noticed the "custard pi" in the opening credits. An interesting excursion ensued to a very interesting "cooking channel".

  • @riffdex
    @riffdex ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you show the model B next? The documentation says there’s an m.2 slot but I don’t see where it is in the stock photos.

  • @alerey4363
    @alerey4363 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't know why Pine released the board without the needed hardware support, in particular for key features like sata and PCIe, which are supposed to be features the rest of the SBCs lack.Thank you for your honest and clear review Professor, as usual.

    • @knerduno5942
      @knerduno5942 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean software support? For the past couple of years they have been steadily releasing hardware without much of any software support.

    • @alerey4363
      @alerey4363 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@knerduno5942 yes, the video shows a really poor performance at least in the desktop environment

    • @knerduno5942
      @knerduno5942 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alerey4363 Because nobody is working on video drivers. Heck seems to be no drivers for the SATA port. Really sad.

  • @crystalsheep1434
    @crystalsheep1434 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very Intresting

  • @montecorbit8280
    @montecorbit8280 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At 6:39
    Request going forward....
    While going through the ribbon cable connectors I realized that it would have been better if you had used a pointer of some type. My original thought was something like a crayon like shape made out of plastic, (so it doesn't get wax on the parts and the plastic won't damage the delicate electronics).
    This may be something to look into for future videos.
    Will there be a"Mr. Pointer" in the future??

  • @lesliedeana5142
    @lesliedeana5142 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fill my noggin with much needed info sir!

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Greetings Leslie! I hope that all is well with you. Have you found the members-only videos?

  • @parrotraiser6541
    @parrotraiser6541 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Obviously, there's more work to be done on the board/OS combination, which will attract rhose who like that sort of thing. Assuming that they can get ir to a reasonable approximation of "working", where would the sterngths and weaknesses of the Quartz put it in the market?

  • @IgabodDobagi
    @IgabodDobagi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm just curious if you actually use any of these sbcs for any purpose other than just tinkering around with them every now and then. Like, do you have one set up as a NAS or as a retro gaming system? Or do you have one set up as a weather station for daily use? Or do you just use your full desktop computer for that stuff still and the sbcs are still in the "big boy toy" category for the time being? For me it is just sitting on my book shelf as sort of a novelty item, but I only have the Raspberry Pi 3 which I got 6 or 7 years ago or something like that. It just didn't have enough oomph to satisfy any of my own needs so I've just been using my normal desktop computer for all of the purposes I can think of for an sbc.

  • @perrymcclusky4695
    @perrymcclusky4695 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Truly it is a fascinating SBC. I would be interested in a follow up video, once the software is "all" working properly. Definitely this SBC shows the possible future of SBC hardware. Looking forward to you next video!

    • @knerduno5942
      @knerduno5942 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good luck with that. The PinePhone has been out over two years and still no stable OS for it. Also, their original Pine64 SBC, most of the distro developers for it dropped support for it quite fast,

    • @perrymcclusky4695
      @perrymcclusky4695 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@knerduno5942 …and that is why I’m not abandoning my Raspberry Pi anytime soon. LOL.

    • @knerduno5942
      @knerduno5942 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The thing is Pine64 gave out 10s of thousands of dollars in donations to about five different Linux OS projects who are making a mobile OS for the PinePhone, and still no stable OS for PinePhone? What did they do with all that money? I hear ya. I am very hesitant to buy anything more from them until something gets done. I have delayed buying their PinePhonePro ($400 is a bit much for the specs), and their SOEdge because both of them are lacking in software support. They released the SOEdge, and no a peep from them about it since it was released some time ago.

    • @perrymcclusky4695
      @perrymcclusky4695 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@knerduno5942 Yup, hardware without decent software support is like having water at the kitchen table without a glass.

    • @ronaldglider
      @ronaldglider ปีที่แล้ว

      @@knerduno5942 _ 10s of thousands of dollars_ sounds like a lot, but it is a drop on a hot plate

  • @mickb00
    @mickb00 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would the Quartz model fit into the Rockpro64 NAS case. Using the Rockpro64 but got the 2gb model at launch and now with a good few dockers running its starting to creak. Would this work with the same power adapter and case. Currently running 2 3.5 disks 12 and 14tb and a SSD.