Riot is Paying Hackers To Break Vanguard

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 เม.ย. 2024
  • In a cruel twist of fates, Riot is now paying people to crash their servers.
    Link to the hacking bounty:
    hackerone.com/riot/?type=team
    Join in to get unique emotes, badge and spoilers for future videos:
    / @necrit
    MERCH:
    ► www.designbyhumans.com/shop/N...
    Links:
    ► / necrit94
    ► / necrit94
    ► / necrit94
    ► / discord
    ► / necrit94
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 962

  • @jsc1jake512
    @jsc1jake512 หลายเดือนก่อน +928

    A lot of companies use this tactic, I think they call them "White-hat hackers." Meaning they offer their skill at hacking to companies in order to hack their systems and find flaws or access points, then lets the company know about these so they can fix them, this significantly reduces the chances of "Black-hat hackers" (criminal hackers) being able to access their systems. It's the essence of fighting fire with fire, who else would know better about how hackers work and think than an actual hacker?

    • @RlVlN
      @RlVlN หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      Yep as soon as I saw the title it made me wish again that I got a pc when I was younger and not a console. White hat hacking is a good side job and I think some people make it their main source of income too

    • @MattHatter360
      @MattHatter360 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      I can confirm that's exactly it :D
      Source: I'm studying cybersecurity at uni

    • @Careless-sv6cf
      @Careless-sv6cf หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Yhup this is why I'm working on my B.S. in cyber security. Companies pay top dollar for you to find ways to break into their online systems so it can be fixed.

    • @Raymuk
      @Raymuk หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Spy vs Spy type shit

    • @darkmatter9651
      @darkmatter9651 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      it sounds kinda smart tbh

  • @Langharig_Tuig
    @Langharig_Tuig หลายเดือนก่อน +264

    The wildest thing about this all is that somehow Hytale still isn't canceled, hot damn!

    • @liqiye3611
      @liqiye3611 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      if it came out, will it be a riot games game !

    • @friendlyfire3412
      @friendlyfire3412 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@liqiye3611 but at this point is it worth it?

    • @liqiye3611
      @liqiye3611 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@friendlyfire3412 i hope they are making something else like some runttera pve game

    • @Biocdon
      @Biocdon 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@liqiye3611Hope? Wtf, why another goofy ahh boring ahh Riot League game that nobody plays, instead of a competition for MC? real question

    • @liqiye3611
      @liqiye3611 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@Biocdon i agree on the last part, but calling riot games ao no one plays them is something is not true att all.

  • @cyberrb25
    @cyberrb25 หลายเดือนก่อน +347

    I mean, this is standard procedure. There is a bounty system for almost any and every security system, so people find out and inform back. They're usually pretty decent (usually in the range of a million bucks or even with extra zeros).

    • @adem4674
      @adem4674 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I would highly doubt there is any sort of bounty for VAC lmfao. The lazy asses over at valve would need to actually update their (non-existent) anticheat if they had one. Valve ain't doing that. They too lazy to actually improve their games.

    • @marcusjohansson668
      @marcusjohansson668 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Correction, there _might_ be a bounty system for closed source applications, open source do not need it because the users check the code with extreme pettiness finding every single weakness FOR FREE.
      Also makes the software WAY safer.
      But that would also mean profit would go down, and we all know what that means.
      Profit > user safety every time.

    • @Wildcat12
      @Wildcat12 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@marcusjohansson668 LMAO. There's plenty of very good reasons companies don't open source their shit. The Riot code leaks from a few months back show exactly why. The moment their anticheat code got made public they saw a 30% increase in cheating. Open source is great for applications that are smaller or allow the user a large degree of control, but not for anything that requires heavy security. And calling open source "WAY safer" is still insane. Just 2 weeks ago almost every Linux system had an intentional RCE backdoor built-in, which had been there for months/years unnoticed. Open source is not inherently any safer for the user.
      I love open source code, it's great for me as a dev. But acting like it's a universal best case is ridiculous.

    • @marcusjohansson668
      @marcusjohansson668 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Wildcat12 The point you completely missed in that whole rant not only shows you have no idea what you are talking about, but that with open source, things like the riot leak would not even happen, because there would be nothing to leak.
      The XY "hack", that did not happen, was found BECAUSE IT IS OPEN SOURCE. LMAO
      Maybe you should focus on the backdoor CIA INTENTIONALLY left in windows FOR YEARS when they found it instead and be worried about that.
      But you show the precise problem in the world, most people are fanboys of capitalism, and therefore hurt themselves.
      There is a definition for it: "useful idiot"
      Google that.
      But I'm actually not saying Leagus should be open source (even though that would be GREAT), I am talking about Vanguard only here.
      The kernel level ROOT KIT you just "trust me bro" installs.

    • @marcusjohansson668
      @marcusjohansson668 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Wildcat12 You talking about the XZ hack that didn't happen BECAUSE it was open source? LMAO
      Yeah, you seem very informed indeed.

  • @BoneWalker
    @BoneWalker หลายเดือนก่อน +225

    Riot: We promise not to cause no issues with our anticheat.
    See y'all again in three months.

    • @peacepham7838
      @peacepham7838 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It has been running for years...

    • @Scorpia260
      @Scorpia260 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Your gamer mouse driver: "We make no promises and don't give 2 shits about the known vulnerabilities in our kernel level driver."

    • @agnuswulf
      @agnuswulf หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      @@peacepham7838 And to this day still causes issues with Valorant. It's not the tragic shitshow it was on launch, but still. Also, next time Riot suffers a data breach, Vanguard info will be more acessible too, so...

    • @peacepham7838
      @peacepham7838 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@agnuswulf Data breach on Vanguard? That won't happen. So you do know the last data breach was Social engineer right? Do you really thing normal employee clearance can have access to security department with encryption? The breach was come through a new LOL employee, that's why League source code got out, because that's the base code every League employee work on.

    • @Braxtonkai
      @Braxtonkai หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      waiting for the bug/feature where our PC needs to ask Riot's servers for permission to perform issues outside of the game or client

  • @lMMl24680
    @lMMl24680 หลายเดือนก่อน +176

    People always use “looking at your search history” like some kind of strawman. Try looking at your bank account, the passwords to every single thing you ever log into, any confidential info, your loans, everyone you communicate with, your legal records, and any other info that can be used against you in any way.

    • @sirbobulous
      @sirbobulous หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      And even if Riot don't do it when the inevitable data breach of their systems to some other hacker happens then those people will have access to that info.

    • @leetri
      @leetri หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      You do know that Riot can already access literally all that if they really wanted to, right? If you install literally any software, that software can access all your info or brick your PC. That's why you're only supposed to open and run files from trusted sources.

    • @leoschafer5172
      @leoschafer5172 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      ​@@leetri Programs that are not running as admins can not read arbitrarily from ram (and don't allow they to capture keystrokes that another program receives [Ctrl/alt keybinds are an exception to this]). They can only read everything that's on your hard drive.
      So even if the client is "bad" it will not be able to get your passwords if you don't save them directly to your disk.

    • @leetri
      @leetri หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@leoschafer5172 Tell me then, how do viruses and other malware do it without admin access? Tons of youtubers have gotten hacked recently because they simply clicked on a scam link or opened an infected file.

    • @jfsebastian8499
      @jfsebastian8499 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@leoschafer5172 the client can just get them with a keylogger

  • @doloran-
    @doloran- หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Anyone remember when the Korean league of legends anti cheat client was leaking player IP's for years up until like last week? Bueller? Anyone?

  • @ashjongasa
    @ashjongasa หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Uninstalled league. Thanks vanguard for making the decision for me.

    • @VertixW
      @VertixW 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      cheating communities propaganda consumer lol

    • @ashjongasa
      @ashjongasa 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      @@VertixW whatever you say chinese spyware supporter

  • @slikugleop
    @slikugleop 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    it is now the end. no more leauge, was considering installing vanguard if forced booted from launch was removed. but sadly it is not.
    "Finally, Riot Vanguard is an on-boot application. That means if you do choose to disable it and later decide you’d like to play League of Legends, you will have to restart your computer."
    ~I am free from this acursed game!~

  • @JesiAsh
    @JesiAsh หลายเดือนก่อน +307

    Looks like we were fighting against scripters and not smurfs

    • @waynebellinger1481
      @waynebellinger1481 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂

    • @sacarymoviesamu
      @sacarymoviesamu หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      hahaha. At least smurfs happen on first days / weeks of split

    • @mendokuse8888
      @mendokuse8888 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Smurfing is allowed why would they fight it

    • @MikeSion
      @MikeSion หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@mendokuse8888"we" the players

    • @mendokuse8888
      @mendokuse8888 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MikeSion mb

  • @vivi1649
    @vivi1649 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    If you want to league your legend, you now have to van your guard.

  • @katacutie
    @katacutie 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    "What do you think riot would do with your information?" is the dumbest question ever, no offense. Data is the biggest market of today, and this gives Tencent the absolute easiest (and cost effective) way to get as much data as they want from millions of westeners. Riot is Tencent's stooge, they are 100% owned by them and therefore obligated to do what they're told. Their passive aggressive post insulting their players and saying that they actually don't meet Tencent too often means literally nothing, since no one can fact check their claims.
    And also, the bounty is meaningless. The data is encrypted, only Riot (therefore Tencent and the ccp) knows what they're stealing.

    • @MrMCKlebeband
      @MrMCKlebeband 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      yeah... i am not even that worried about data "breaches" because the worst possible people already have access.

  • @andreivrasmas9406
    @andreivrasmas9406 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    22:17 Morde mains for old schoolers.
    Viego mains for the new playerbase

  • @paulogmf
    @paulogmf หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    It's okay guys, Tencent would never steal our data...

    • @jonathanabgrall6075
      @jonathanabgrall6075 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Unless you're an Amish Tencent has your data already.

    • @gelzal2870
      @gelzal2870 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jonathanabgrall6075 And control in your pc?

  • @tobidobidu1129
    @tobidobidu1129 หลายเดือนก่อน +164

    Its kinda insane to me to where the general mindset of the public has drifted to.
    We had 2 decades of consensis that you should never give anyone online your data. And bit by bit that mindset got brittled down.
    Cookies became a thing, with a short massive outcry when the public realised what they were.
    Facebook became a thing, with a massive outcry after peoples data got sold behind their backs.
    TOS‘ more and more integrated permission to use personal info, which everyone warned each other about.
    Now all of that has gotten so normal that millions of people go: „Access to my entire PC and sensible data? As long as I can play my videogame thats fine. They promised not to fuck me over so I can trust them.“

    • @BoneWalker
      @BoneWalker หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      inb4 a farmer comes in to setup their "you're just mad cause you script" strawman

    • @psyolia
      @psyolia หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      Exactly this. Will never install a kernel level anti-cheat. Even if riot is honest what they say about data collection and privacy terms, they still can be hacked, resulting in hackers having kernel level access to my system. Also the Linux part was so much bs. Ofc there aren't any linux players anymore if you keep announcing vanguard will come, which (for good reason) does not run on linux by design.

    • @Scorpia260
      @Scorpia260 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      You're not wrong. But the security field itself has also changed over time too. It is quite literally impossible now to fully prevent an attack or breach. Now security is all about making it difficult and layering solutions. If you are a more difficult target than someone else, then you are safer. Windows Defender is pretty good these days. But in my opinion, no one should consider their PC a truly safe space unless they have never connected it in any way to the outside world.
      We have no choice but to live in various shades of risk. Riot' is 100% right when they say that they don't need kernel level access to get everything. And that holds true to a large swath of games and software people install without a thought before now. It's honestly great that this is forcing people to actually think about the choices they are making to install something.
      And frankly, Vanguard forces people to actually update their damn machines and drivers that are riddled with decades old vulnerabilities. So that's kinda nice, lol.

    • @obeywario1
      @obeywario1 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      you gave Valve your data by using Steam.

    • @Rigele100
      @Rigele100 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      then you should stop using the internet at all, cut your pc/laptop/whatever from the internet and kick yourself back to the year 1900 and if you want to play "something" start using old CD's again so you dont need the internet for something. :)

  • @Pandoso01
    @Pandoso01 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    someone has the clip of piratesoftware talking about vanguard, cant find it, the date works too, i can go scrub the vods

    • @AssassinGamer
      @AssassinGamer หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same, I want to hear it aswell.

    • @jcps17
      @jcps17 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      From the looks of it its his stream from 4 days ago. Vod duration is 12:11:39.

    • @vanatrix1942
      @vanatrix1942 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I saw a short of him talking about it, but idk if I'd be able to find it again

    • @sinistressdreams7243
      @sinistressdreams7243 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I took the time and looked over the last 4 vods. Its the one 4 days ago. He talks about it at 07:18:00 (or a bit sooner) but you should find it.
      VOD from 13.04.24

    • @naclnyx6786
      @naclnyx6786 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So glad others are looking for it. I wanted to find it too

  • @koenyboy500
    @koenyboy500 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Gotta love how Necrit KEEPS TALKING about Vangaurd and its working.
    Meanwhile the problem is that Riot has been hacked at times and it's not Riot we fear with the Kernel level stuff but what hackers are able to do with it.
    And I know other anticheats also have this but they don't have a bullseye painted upon them. This has.
    I feel safe with what Riot does. I don't feel safe with what other people will do once they get it.

    • @davo4074
      @davo4074 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      your also forgetting Riot games may have nice people as their employees but what about its parent company that it legally has to answer to and legally has to give that parent company anything it wants on demand...

  • @BM4Dayz69
    @BM4Dayz69 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    @17:40 Riot doesn't care about what you do with your computer, but Tencent would.

  • @chochetto
    @chochetto หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "Do you think they are interested in your search history" YES!!! YES THEY ARE

  • @Notllamalord
    @Notllamalord หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Cant wait to find my credit card and address on a database after Riot's "flawless" ccp data extractor gets hacked

    • @neonoir__
      @neonoir__ หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      linked with your full name, email and hardware id of course :))

    • @kauanjos3199
      @kauanjos3199 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They already have it

    • @timosyska9894
      @timosyska9894 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      „But maaan what does riot want with your browser history.“ most dystopian shit I’ve heared

    • @Juuz9
      @Juuz9 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      oh no, the whole 32.93$ of yours are in danger... anyway

    • @timosyska9894
      @timosyska9894 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@Juuz9 projecting?

  • @wrathfuldemon3422
    @wrathfuldemon3422 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Having a korean based system where your account is linked to YOU as a PERSON is a way better solution to combat cheating/botting than installing some software that has control over my pc more than I do and could get hacked any day due to some stupid crack that it might have.

    • @tingispingis
      @tingispingis 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      How is that a realistic solution lol

    • @wrathfuldemon3422
      @wrathfuldemon3422 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@tingispingis Well, i'd rather have my account tied to any sort of identity document (how it's done in Korea/China) rather than having a program running on my PC at all times.

  • @heychrisfox
    @heychrisfox หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Entire community: "Hey, could you deal with the trolls and griefers that are in 1:3 games that I play, constantly ruining my experience?"
    Riot: "No, but we can install malware on your computer and fix a problem you didn't know existed."

    • @ethanstyant9704
      @ethanstyant9704 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      spyware more accurately

    • @HiSodiumContent
      @HiSodiumContent 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ethanstyant9704 Wake up, Ethan. You've been in a coma for the past 5 years. We've been trying to get through to you. Your family misses you. Wake up.

    • @davo4074
      @davo4074 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      bro this is literally boiled down to its finest sauce so sad but true.....

  • @whysoserious9214
    @whysoserious9214 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    2009-2024 RIP

  • @minhquanvu2944
    @minhquanvu2944 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    RIP. Nickyboi's Cassiopeia

  • @worldboxvn8214
    @worldboxvn8214 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Riot probably ban me when they saw my tristana Search history. I hope it is not a perma ban

  • @Warm_Fireplace
    @Warm_Fireplace หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Did you actually watch pirate software stream?
    How can you tell he "got impressed" when he literally says "ill never play i game with kernel level anti cheat".
    And complains about how this is an option but not the "correct one".

    • @marhaven4421
      @marhaven4421 หลายเดือนก่อน

      do you have a link to the stream? i tried to find it but i aint got time to sift through multiple 12h streams

    • @ramirocarnicer2503
      @ramirocarnicer2503 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Absolutetly, I remember watching the short and he ended it saying he is not going to play any game with Kernel level anti cheat. Using his video and then cutting it short is shameful!

    • @davo4074
      @davo4074 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      not only is it not the "correct" one its the lazy one, kernel level anti-cheats dont make it more secure it automates the detection process for the devs. In essence its using ChatGPT for an essay but in the dev world.....

  • @mercifulservant9619
    @mercifulservant9619 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    the yellow fking chart at "12:50" include the free skin mod users btw

    • @posizzisop2389
      @posizzisop2389 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      absolutely not. Nobody is getting banned for skin mods

    • @prideless2122
      @prideless2122 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@posizzisop2389 what makes you think that?

    • @posizzisop2389
      @posizzisop2389 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@prideless2122 what do you think a hardware ban is

    • @prideless2122
      @prideless2122 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@posizzisop2389 "getting banned for skin mods", did you already forget what you typed or what xd, skin mods are custom ingame skins which alter the files of league of legends. No Hardware mods lma0

    • @tomisjoblom5998
      @tomisjoblom5998 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@prideless2122Actually the skin changer is flagged by Vanguard as its 3rd party program that alters your game files.

  • @deusvult1307
    @deusvult1307 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Iam already seeing it. most peopel will have the "We couldn't install a required dependency. Please try again, restart your computer or reach out to us at Riot Support."

  • @kolliwanne964
    @kolliwanne964 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    I dont even believe that Rito/Tencent is stealing all my data through vanguard. The issue is that I dont want to install a backdoor in my computer that just BEGS to be exploited by some third party hacker one day. Just now Korean pro players get DDOS's because the korean anti cheat system (yes they have an additional one) got broken and now the hackers sell the ip adresses.
    Thanks but no thanks. I would rather register my ID card for one fixed account, than willingly installing a rootkit on my main computer. Maybe if I ever have too much money and get a secondary PC/Laptop I will come back. But until then I wont install LoL again.

  • @oldman7408
    @oldman7408 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Riot gonna lose so much money with these hacking competition 😂

  • @Ultraporing
    @Ultraporing หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    As a person that implemented anti cheat measures in our online multiplayer shooter, I can confidently say that hwid (hardware id) circumvention is easy and detection is only a bandaid. Most payed serious cheats do that automatically. But it helps^^.

    • @zeronothinghere9334
      @zeronothinghere9334 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      They are not banning hardware ID, they are banning the TPM 2.0 module. Which, I should note, is not as easily bypassable as TPM 1.0

    • @Ultraporing
      @Ultraporing หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@zeronothinghere9334 I see, thanks for clarifying.

  • @AleeWiksa
    @AleeWiksa หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:30 from what I remember the Urgot clip was abusing the old League client bug where you could add unexpected amount of point to masteries from the old mastery tree system, such as summoner spell cooldown reduction mastery, which led to this bug specifically, as you ended up starting the game with 100% cooldown reduction on your spells leading to infinite amount of flashes and smites in the game.

  • @cookiecreep9204
    @cookiecreep9204 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Hiring white collar hackers to test security is standard, but the rest of the post...
    The post was so goddamn condescending, all to excuse kernel-level access, which they do not need. No game should demand this much access and just promise to be nice, while if anything goes wrong, its my machine that suffers.
    And they decided to completely ignore things those programs do catch that have nothing to do with cheating, like unrelated development software, VMs and so on.
    No security goal excuses demanding this much access for a game.

    • @Braxtonkai
      @Braxtonkai หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      a lot of needs from a small indy company

    • @MisterAssasine
      @MisterAssasine หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      dev software and VMs are not caught. It only prevents playing FROM a VM.

    • @Dotum
      @Dotum 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      VMs aren’t blocked,and never have been like the guy above said. The program does detect if you use a virtual machine and LAUNCH a riot program.

    • @BabyKnxckz
      @BabyKnxckz 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Vms can fals alarm and get u banned u dont have to play for them just having then installed or running a progress in the background can trigger the always active vanguard

  • @jeromegrudzinski5122
    @jeromegrudzinski5122 หลายเดือนก่อน +122

    Riot can have my search history if they like Futa lillia and soraka then I dare them

    • @jansonshrock2859
      @jansonshrock2859 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      while they're at it they will take the log in info to your bank account and your email and social media passwords too, ooh maybe they'll also want to take your address and sell that to people too

    • @sirbobulous
      @sirbobulous หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      A sophisticated art enjoyer then.

    • @ibrahim5463
      @ibrahim5463 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Dude futa lillia never came to my mind and now i can't get it out

    • @OwnerOfGlory
      @OwnerOfGlory หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jansonshrock2859 TH-cam knows your real name, address, and their parent company is Google, so let's not talk about your search history. If you want to watch content that has been labeled for adults, you need to give them your credit card. The site you are using knows more about you than any hacker ever will.

    • @WholesomeVolibear
      @WholesomeVolibear หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Dont forget kindred too

  • @Barrosy
    @Barrosy หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    17:45 considering Riot is a commercial business, why wouldn't they want to collect interesting data on our machines to sell it off to the highest bidder? It has happened before and therefor I understand the negative thoughts a lot of people have about the whole matter.

    • @Dotum
      @Dotum 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It would be massively illegal if they did, but again that’s only if it’s found out.

    • @BabyKnxckz
      @BabyKnxckz 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Other companies have done it got fined for it but compared to the money they made the fine was nothing

  • @Blu_Moon_Owl
    @Blu_Moon_Owl หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    6:35 you what’s ironically funny, I’ve seen practically unstoppable enemy Vayne players when first really playing League (I started last year in February). So when pretty new/low level, Vayne destroyed us almost every time there was one in game. Maybe it was a bot at times.

  • @ricardomillares3695
    @ricardomillares3695 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    This didn't age well. PCs are going to shit. Just uninstall all Riot shit. Not worth it.

  • @DreamingBlindly
    @DreamingBlindly หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The notes:it's literally sitting there (menacingly) 😂 that's definitely a programme's note

  • @jelomun2
    @jelomun2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They said its not gonna be supported for windows 7 and windows 8, but its not supported for windows 10 2017 version and older.. so yea rip that..

  • @vladislavkaras491
    @vladislavkaras491 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for all this information!

  • @TheOVJM
    @TheOVJM หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The problem still isn't the harvesting of information but the massive security risk that the a kernel level anti cheat is. If, for instance, a backdoor access is found in it then every system that has that anti cheat is in danger of being compromised.

  • @redmouse22
    @redmouse22 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    1/15 games is tough, but atleast its no where near the top fps games which have as many cheaters as 1 / 3 games having cheaters (and thats for 5v5 games like val / csgo / r6 -- i can only imagine that literally every BR game like Apex has a cheater in litterally every top lobby)

    • @Nigolasy
      @Nigolasy หลายเดือนก่อน

      This statistic got made public a little bit earlier than this post. The same day I had a highly suspicious Kaisa in my enemies team.
      Playing Leona, I was literally unable to hit my E during laning phase. Only when team fights started and 3 or more skill shots came flying towards that player, I could land my E.
      I kept telling me: "Jesus, they are good at dodging. Must be a really good player" and even a friend of mine said: "Yeah, Leona E is a pretty small hit box" but I literally felt like I was going insane, not hitting E's I would usually hit.
      After I saw that statistic, I was sure that player was using an on/off script where you turn it on if needed and play normal otherwise. Because there were moments, when that player didn't dodge the easiest skill shots and then they dodged everything.

  • @bladescythe6589
    @bladescythe6589 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Patch 14.8 Vanguard is implemented in my country. My Lol client that I can run consistent at 80 fps at max settings became unplayable even at lowest graphic settings and resolution going from 1920x1080 to 1360x720 because of Vanguard. I can't even access my practice tool.

    • @Dneptun4o
      @Dneptun4o หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      stop using a potato

    • @Yo1chiHiruma
      @Yo1chiHiruma หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well my ultra potato laptop without a dedicated gpu could run Valorant with steady 60fps, so there is that

  • @hyd3334
    @hyd3334 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My probelm with Vanguard is not how it operates or how much access it has, but rather how much it can break a device, ever since i installed it my pc has been worse, much more blue screen's, sometimes my mouse just doesnt work... I guess its time to say goodbye to Lol.

  • @OnlySamCan
    @OnlySamCan หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    13:34 that graph just shows there has been a lot of hardware bans, there is not any way for us to confirm how many of those where legit or false positives.

    • @sugihara5091
      @sugihara5091 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Is that you argument? We dont know if its false positives? What a terrible argument

    • @OnlySamCan
      @OnlySamCan 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@sugihara5091 I'm not even making an argument just stating we cant just take that graph see big number and assume every one of those cases where perfectly executed.

    • @sugihara5091
      @sugihara5091 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@OnlySamCan In the case of an anticheat where it is not heuristics based you can guarantee that the bans will be 99% effective. not to mention that the graph was hardware based, how big you think the margin of error is for a HARDWARE ban, think about that

  • @fernandogonzalez6759
    @fernandogonzalez6759 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I would say... that graphic that riot pulled is really really tricky... cuz you are seeing the quantity of games with scripters AND bots... but they aren't telling you from WICH gamemode is pulled the data and who is who, you don't see what % of that massive graphic are bots and what % are scripters and also you don't see what gamemode were played with the bot or the script, is a VERY CONVINIENT graphic to show... could be just the botting that happens in ARAM and plaver vs computer mode... you know... later they inflate the elo based grapic with "IN GRANDMASTER ARE A HIGH AMOUNT OF SCRIPTERS, CHEATERS AND EXPLOITERS" when in reallity there aren't cuz grandmaster have a low count of players... so the problem are like a 0.01% of the global players are cheating so we are pulling our spyware in every server besides china (how ilarious) so we lose basically 20% of the global player base that actually don't cheat

    • @fernandogonzalez6759
      @fernandogonzalez6759 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "1 of 15 games have a scripter or a cheater"... again... in WICH gamemode? aram? player vs ia? low ranked? high ranked? all of them? obviously they will not say it cuz it would be most probably player vs ia...

    • @fernandogonzalez6759
      @fernandogonzalez6759 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and in the raked graphic you see where are the most players they don't tend to cheat... that is totally contradictory with riot premise of "a lot of players are cheating" cuz iron, bronce, and silver aren't cheating...

  • @privateName419
    @privateName419 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    UMMM IS IT JUST ME OR IS LEAGUE BUGGY SINCE VANGUARD. I updated just yesterday. Since then whenever i join a match even TFT my pc crashes. EVERY FKING MATCH. Oh well at least I Have a reason to quit for good this time. Never crashed before the update.and never crashes when doing anything else

  • @phecdaDia
    @phecdaDia 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    One major thing that bugs me about the dev post is that they showed that their old non-kernel level anticheat "Packman" worked. It worked well even. But now just because that got broken we take out the nuclear option to force kernel level anticheats which run 24/7. A non-kernel level anticheat works just as well. Even kernel level anticheats can easily be bypassed. Hardware bans don't work.

  • @Adonna2424
    @Adonna2424 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    so the stats only look at ranked games so why does someone who doesn't play ranked or SR have to have this? Honestly, who gives a shit about cheaters, I'd rather protect my personal security than worry about a made up stat in a game that means nothing in comparison.

    • @AtakenSmith
      @AtakenSmith หลายเดือนก่อน

      If your personal information is that important to you and you feel like Riot is the biggest threat to it (which is false imao) then don't play the game. Do you use Facebook or google...? I mean it's a stupid question, you are on TH-cam. (Owned by Google) They are known to steal and sell your information. Like a bunch of very used other product, services or companies.

    • @Adonna2424
      @Adonna2424 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AtakenSmith it's Tencent and China I worry about. I use fake info for accounts and refuse to dl any apps that require my personal info.

  • @MakiW2409
    @MakiW2409 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Vanguard is already useless, hackers nowdays dont need to hack directly to the anti-cheat system, they usually use color recognition and some scripts to help the mouse aim towards those lines, and guess what games likes to use color outlines for their characters? Yeah, ain't no way, vanguard has 0 chance to detect periferals if those get spofeed again and again.
    And Vanguard doesn't do any shit to match fixing, trolling etc etc...

  • @rice1925
    @rice1925 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    One big issue that's going to come from Vanguard is the collegiate scene. Most college/universities public computer labs have their computers wipe after logging out (deletes any installed content, aka LoL). Since Vanguard requires a restart, playing LoL will no longer be possible on any school pc's (which is surprisingly going to limit a LOT of people).

    • @SkywalkerOne1977
      @SkywalkerOne1977 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Maybe their grades will improve?

    • @drjamaymay405
      @drjamaymay405 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The college players don't play in computer labs. They use their own computers or a set of esports computers.

    • @rice1925
      @rice1925 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @drjamaymay405 as a college player, I can confirm the majority of them use the public labs

  • @IonicSuperNova
    @IonicSuperNova หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great A Coverage on this Topic Necrit!!!

  • @ccchhhuuuiii
    @ccchhhuuuiii หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is solely and purely to protect pros and streamers. Regular players don't see cheaters and will never see one. Its a fraction or a tiny segment of a miniscule sample of people that may find a cheater.

    • @drjamaymay405
      @drjamaymay405 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most popular esport, probably a good decision.

    • @shreeanshmahapatra2313
      @shreeanshmahapatra2313 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you are in bronze then it makes sense that you will never see cheaters.

  • @zeross39
    @zeross39 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The part that worry me is if we cheat in other games it might false detect. Like it's my problem if i cheat on my single player games using cheat engine or some other things. should not affect my league account.

    • @sotilaskarkuri
      @sotilaskarkuri หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That's my problem with Vanguard too.

    • @DarkDodgers
      @DarkDodgers หลายเดือนก่อน

      This brings up another question: Why the heck are you cheating in other games? If it's single player it's whatever but online too!? C'mon guys. ARE WE NOT ADULTS!?

    • @zeross39
      @zeross39 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@DarkDodgers yeah i said it single player. for some old games cheat engine can sometimes be used to patch some compatibility issues too.

    • @sotilaskarkuri
      @sotilaskarkuri หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@DarkDodgers did you read the original comment? we were talking about singleplayer games mostly. and in multiplayer gamers? ever hosted a server in GTA V just for you and your friends to fuck around with cheats and shit?

    • @wanyshu1671
      @wanyshu1671 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ngl, when I play Terraria with my friends, I always duplicate Wormhole potions (used to tp player to player). We're not using them to break the game or something, it just helps making the game a little faster paced and fun on big maps.

  • @LulleLin
    @LulleLin หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Imagine if hackers start to somehow install cheats on ppls computers and perma ban that computer from league, just to f with ppl

    • @jonathanabgrall6075
      @jonathanabgrall6075 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ngl this is the first legitimate concern i see about this. Specially in regions relying more on internet cafés, PC bangs etc.
      At the same time considering how big League is in these regions i'm sure Riot thought about it. Like an hardware ban isn't irreversible.

    • @LulleLin
      @LulleLin หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jonathanabgrall6075 true, but if u possess litte to no knowledge about computers, and still have to prove that you did not do it.
      For examples, hackers can just "hack" their own computers and claim they got hacked, i guess for now it still works as it should, if they cheat they still get the ban anyway, untill proven not guilty of the intentional hacking in game

  • @kiranmi.94
    @kiranmi.94 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Vanguard will not be enou-th" lolol @ 18:13. big fan necrit thanks for all your work

  • @OnyHipHopMusic
    @OnyHipHopMusic หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Cool stuff , now on another note , is Vanguard gonna stop deleting installed files of every VPN in the world ? like can someone have theyr games installed and be able to work remotely to pay theyr bills? lmao
    its rly cute what they say they are doing , but theyr anticheat just blocks everything it gets its hands on , no matter if its actually a cheat or a non harmfull VPN , doesnt even matter if you have the game open ( Vanguard opens with windows, will not allow VPNs to work correctly even with games closed). Just FYI closing Vanguard wont solve , as Vanguard swipes the already installed files of the VPNs making them unusable until we reinstall. And ofc next day will happen again unless the game is uninstalled. Never been able to keep playing Valorant due to this reason , i guess its bye bye to League as well lmfao

  • @supportyourself5501
    @supportyourself5501 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    17:47 Riot not, but Tencent does...

  • @Dragonheng
    @Dragonheng หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    What bothers me about the article:
    Timestamps are not consistent.
    The rank graph is also a thing. Fewer players equals higher impact. Seen on all elos but less.
    The Bugbonty program is a thing with cheats you can always earn constant money, with the betrayals you could end up in jail if you're stupid.
    It's not the issue that it runs in kernel.
    It's the other things:
    Always On, Force TPM and Force Secure Boot.
    This forcing is my core problem, just like always being on.
    What else Vanguard brings with it.[Bugs!!]

  • @SuagulishusR
    @SuagulishusR หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You know since I'm stuck in Riot iron hell I tend to see more cheaters but I sometimes encounter them in Norms playing Yumi Soraka and Jinx oddly enough it was very strange it was just a jinx that would farm and only farm and kept farming until the game ended. In the enemy noticed and kept killing her I've also noticed it with the ram is jungle you'll just see this really bad Ramos that's just farming and sometimes just stands there doing nothing and it's absolutely blasted by the enemy jungler and simply goes back to farming.
    Hopefully Riot Vanguard fixes this

    • @Shiftry87
      @Shiftry87 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That almost sounds like a lvling bot that was used.

  • @darrenong1278
    @darrenong1278 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think what is being said about the cooldown for abilities is client sided, and that is the reason why the spam the abilities might be wrong. From what I remember there was a mastery which reduces your summoner spell cooldown and somehow they hacked it so they can put as much points in it as they want.

  • @jltg34
    @jltg34 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The heavy leaning on the slippery slope fallacy is just disappointing. Logically, there's a limit of invasiveness that will absolutely protect against all cheats. The idea that the AC will have to escalate and escalate until you're playing on console is just silly, and frankly, dishonest...

  • @123FireSnake
    @123FireSnake หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    7:25 it doesn't mean that at all, Rito might want to pretend that it does but that's a ridiculous claim

    • @illusionofartYT
      @illusionofartYT หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hmm im curious how so? And what proof? I'm genuinely curious cause this is all new to me

    • @123FireSnake
      @123FireSnake หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@illusionofartYT Rampant boosting, horrible balance, myriad of bugs that can be abused for months on end, leavers in every second game. How the hell's that a healthy competitive scene. Moreover ranked is the default queue for most players, that again shows you that the majority of players don't really take it seriously. At least they are slowly fixing the ranking system itself but the game quality is still ass.
      In other words the statement that that implies a good competitive scene is wild conjecture with no proof.
      My credentials for these claims are Diamond/Master and playing the game for 14 years (fuck me i'm old).
      All it means it that ranked has ever so slightly higher bragging rights than normals, because of course they still do have that, but the ranked system is far from in a good state, and it's not been in a good state since season 1

  • @zeronothinghere9334
    @zeronothinghere9334 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "legally" here means that the kernel has to handle the kernel calls from software in user mode, as in, the computer allows Vanguard to do this, not that they can by law access files on your computer that they shouldn't.

  • @bassyey
    @bassyey 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    11:24 It depends on TPM module they use. Most people aren't buying those TPM boards anymore. Modern TPM is CPU-based already. That's why custom builds can use Windows 11.

  • @edvard4068
    @edvard4068 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This is a willful miss of the actuall issue. Yes Riot will have eyes on them when they release this software. But what happends in 5 years when this information is no longer openly talked about. We are not only expecting Riot to stand on principle on privacy but we are also expecting them not to fall for pressure from any third party groups that might have an interest in direct access to millions of players computers. I am sorry let the cheaters reign. Every single tech company have shown us that everything is up for grabs as long as the price is good enough.

  • @davidnymann5423
    @davidnymann5423 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Vanguard isnt going to change a thing

  • @Jack1Wilians
    @Jack1Wilians หลายเดือนก่อน

    i think an easyer way to do this is to add your social security numbers to online games company side so if we hack the only way to get a new account would be through getting a new social security number, or create a similar effect number for the purpose of online discourse

  • @larrynx15
    @larrynx15 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    On our public computer shops we can't play now

  • @lstrk4390
    @lstrk4390 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I understand the explanation, but I still don't trust it, and at a point it won't be enough. So I'm quitting league for a while still

  • @lucianoformisano2274
    @lucianoformisano2274 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    No link to the Pirate Software stream recorded?

    • @phantomtigerman
      @phantomtigerman 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hopefully someone has it

  • @chouderr1089
    @chouderr1089 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    when was the PirateSoftware stream on this? I would like to see it.

  • @geoslavic4154
    @geoslavic4154 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They can say anything about what Vanguard does and doesn't, we still won't know what's going on in the background.
    As in, they can say it doesn't do X, but it does X anyways.

  • @sanayeonnie1688
    @sanayeonnie1688 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Pls touch the V2 lux in LoR 😭 i don't under why she got another one

  • @enciphered7650
    @enciphered7650 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    If you ever have to say "they aren't interested in your search history" you have already crossed a line.

  • @lavarsch
    @lavarsch 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When you look how much cheats costs (at least from what i could find overall, not specifically lol) they are often really expensive. It's a whole market. and seeing how many people cheat (again, not specifically lol), i think $10 000 isn't "that much" compared to people who are willing to spend $20+ monthly, sometimes even way more.

  • @Braxtonkai
    @Braxtonkai หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    account leveling via scripting won't be fixed by this for the most part, doubly so with innovations in AI. you already can train AI to play a game like a player using inputs

  • @zeronothinghere9334
    @zeronothinghere9334 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When did Pirate Software talk about Vanguard? Please, I need this ;-; All the stream VODs are too long and none of them titled Vanguard, their youtube channel does not have it

    • @minxnoraen6943
      @minxnoraen6943 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      around 6:50:00 4 days ago a 12:11:XX stream on twitch

    • @zeronothinghere9334
      @zeronothinghere9334 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@minxnoraen6943 Thanks

  • @kexcz8276
    @kexcz8276 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Damn, If I wasn't mechanical but software engineer instead! 😂

  • @doomanubis
    @doomanubis หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    funny how much data and knowledge they have on cheaters and how common they are or know intro bots had full lobby of them, and yet they couldnt stop anything or even admit how bad it is, unless its time to push kernal lvl access so many years later

  • @lordmonocr6206
    @lordmonocr6206 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The stat that says that we’ve probably seen scriptures is really interesting. I didn’t think I’ve ever seen one personally but maybe I have. Just never really noticed

  • @limo2675
    @limo2675 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    3:50 it's false, the no coldown on flash was due to a cheat engine exploit that allowed you to use multiple mastery points on the same mastery. So instead of 5 mastery points you could use 30 on coldown reduction.

    • @sidawan9297
      @sidawan9297 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So you proved the statement to be true, cuz cheat engine can only influence information stored on your side.

    • @limo2675
      @limo2675 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sidawan9297 There wasn't a check in mastery system not in cooldown. Even the worst programmer know that the skills need to be checked server side.

    • @Karavusk
      @Karavusk หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah there were somewhat local cd abuses but this one was just a mastery point oversight. A real CD exploit happened with botrk which made the active have 0 CD

    • @Braxtonkai
      @Braxtonkai หลายเดือนก่อน

      what I think is funny is instead of chasing the mouse, (keeping people from flashing on no/.01 sec CD) they don't have a net looking for things that shouldn't happen. X person flashed twice within ~200 seconds? red flag.

    • @limo2675
      @limo2675 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Karavusk It was a smartcast bug or settings bug.

  • @cloudshifter
    @cloudshifter หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I still find Vanguard to be a stupendous method of anti cheat. Obv you will be able to capture a cheater if you have absolute control over your clients PC (since vanguard assumes a control level above administrator rights), including everything they own and even access to their devices like webcams etc. You can even access their private bank info. Riot will not do it but if one person breaches them it's over.
    If Vanguard decides by it's own to change a tiny line of code by accident (which let's be honest even the riot client is a broken mess of spaghetti code which barely works half of the times) where it matters on your PC, it might be unable to ever open again.

    • @Nigolasy
      @Nigolasy หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm pretty sure Vanguard is not a sentient software that can change itself.

    • @drjamaymay405
      @drjamaymay405 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Vanguard has been in val for 3 years and they only had small problems right with the software launch.
      Skepticism is completely reasonable, but bricking the players PC's shouldn't be of concern this deep into Vanguard's lifespan.

  • @alphawolf5294
    @alphawolf5294 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    what are they going to do that monitor that has built-in AI that basically pings your screen about potential ganks? It is like cheating without running a program.

    • @Braxtonkai
      @Braxtonkai หลายเดือนก่อน

      AI use is another can of worms

  • @cyberdevil657
    @cyberdevil657 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have been training for this my whole LIFE LMAO!!!!

  • @drbowser166
    @drbowser166 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    If Riot were to investigate player's computers...Do you think they will finally see how popular the furry characters are and give them more skins? Maybe I should put together a folder for that named "RIOT LOOK HERE" and hope they get the hint. Other furries should do the same.

    • @RlVlN
      @RlVlN หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm not a furry but after watching Hazbin Hotel and Helluva Boss. . . well idk

    • @gelzal2870
      @gelzal2870 หลายเดือนก่อน

      (⊙_⊙)?(*゜ー゜*)(°ー°〃)

  • @cyberdevil657
    @cyberdevil657 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Vangaurd has not even been released and they already found ways to make cheats even more tedious with 0 detection if u have a spare 5 $ and a iq above 80 to install some code on a raspberry pi.. This will be a disaster..

    • @drjamaymay405
      @drjamaymay405 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You need a raspberry pi to cheat now.
      That is quite massive, would-be cheaters are probably going to stop because they don't care enough to buy one.

    • @cyberdevil657
      @cyberdevil657 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@drjamaymay405 lol I think quite the opposite.. If you cheat with a raspberry it will be even more stealthy...
      And believe me that you can be a complete idiot and just install it.
      U dont need to be a tech savvy person. That's the worst part

    • @BabyKnxckz
      @BabyKnxckz 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@drjamaymay405anyone who cheats in league is invested enough to buy a rasperri pi

  • @keganrodhe8625
    @keganrodhe8625 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope that winrate for low ranked accounts isn't used to directly ban players, I used to have 80% winrate around 5-6 years ago (without cheats and without smurfing) as I almost never played and suddenly got a ton of free time and decided to spend a couple of weeks grinding and improving

  • @JackDaniels-ct5wz
    @JackDaniels-ct5wz 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    it still to this day just informs me of the vanguard update, and I do not have it installed... idk what this is about xD

  • @123FireSnake
    @123FireSnake หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    They can try what they want I ain't installing that shit. And you did mention Thor. Though he cleared up some stuff he also stated that you should absolutely not run that kind of anti cheat. :D

  • @IMDee
    @IMDee หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I dono guys, the post isn't selling me. Just saw the vanguard notification in the league client. It said that my system is "ready for vanguard". Moments after seeing that I uninstalled the game. I don't think I'll be coming back anytime soon. I don't trust Riot especially since they don't share the whole story. Sure the graphs are pretty , their motives are noble, but the price is just to damn high. I will not allow a driver to stare "menacingly" at my system waiting to strike. If the thing does nothing without a game, the why have it running. If it's running it must be doing something :)
    So .. as far as I am concerned this is the line I am not willing to cross and Riot can go play league with themselves and vanguard. I am dropping this like a hot potato

    • @Silverinis
      @Silverinis หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      See you soon!

    • @laikhoabang
      @laikhoabang หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Wdym, necrit literally summarised why vanguard staring menacingly is a bit misleading? It's because you can't trust the operating system that is window so they created their own checking driver just checking it periodically to make sure that everything is fine. You can switch to Mac with their os and should be fine i believe.

    • @maxxorb6515
      @maxxorb6515 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@laikhoabang piratesoftware read the article, according to him this is bullshit, it is always on, even when you're not playing.

    • @Braxtonkai
      @Braxtonkai หลายเดือนก่อน

      how does mac work with TPM thing? Or does it since it's only a windows thing?

    • @angelortiz7231
      @angelortiz7231 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love all the cheaters saying im leaving cuz i dont trust their shit. Players who have nothing to jode dont cate about this. Its only cheaters and people with something to hide who care

  • @andreslang9833
    @andreslang9833 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If I use a "cheat" (like motherlode) in a game like Sims 4, will vanguard detect me and ban me? Also, I have mods in Skyrim, idk if it affects it aswell

    • @valeriaarecar4761
      @valeriaarecar4761 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If Vanguard detects your mouse or headphones as scripting idk man

    • @BabyKnxckz
      @BabyKnxckz 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It should not but it happend before

  • @nope7200
    @nope7200 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    we dont need kernel level presence it will expose so many things on the user's system. Majority of players dont cheat. it is often the top percentile of players which is a low amount of people and the new accounts. this just sounds like a product that someone within riot wants to expand to look good in their resume or track record.

  • @user-mz3ov7pd3y
    @user-mz3ov7pd3y หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Necrit when we getting back to opinion pieces and not shilling for riot? please

  • @davo4074
    @davo4074 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    ye see the funky thing about this is, kernel level anti-cheats.... dont actually make their games more secure 😅 all it does it automate the process for the devs..... basically the devs are too bloody lazy to actually come up with proper solutions so they go with the "uses ChatGPT for a college essay" card and try to spin it as this end all be all thing. when truth is its a crock of shit 🤣valorant is riddled in cheaters and no one admits it simply becuase they spent hundreds on skins they can never re-sell ahahaha me included like, but atleast i can see through the fog.... 13 years of my life i spent on league. now i have to leave it behind........

  • @Smilling_Sadface
    @Smilling_Sadface หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Idk how vanguard usually behaves since I don't play valorant. I simply disable it from autostarting on startup, and then manually start in services to play league without needing a reboot, the vgc service would also automatically stops once I close league client or riot client.

    • @neonoir__
      @neonoir__ หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thats just the vanguard tray icon you're disabling. If you actually disabled vanguard (vgk.sys in task manager, check, it's there) the option to launch your game is greyed out

    • @Smilling_Sadface
      @Smilling_Sadface หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@neonoir__ yeah, what I disabled is the tray icon on the startup tab in the task manager, the service wasn't running, there's smth called vgc in services it's not disabled it was simply set to manual. I have to manually start it before I start the riot client to play league (if not the league launcher is greyed out), and once it's running there would be something called "vanguard-user-mode-service" and under it is the vgc. exe service, and once I close the riot client it automatically stops as well and disappears in the task manager and also stops running in the services.

    • @Smilling_Sadface
      @Smilling_Sadface หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@neonoir__ no, not quite right, I just tested it again but it seems like if starts the riot
      client but don't launch LoL and simply sign out and close the riot client the vanguard user-mode service will remain running in the task manager but if I launch LoL and then sign out through League client and "x" riot client, the service will automatically stop as well.

  • @evilofalfa
    @evilofalfa หลายเดือนก่อน

    correct me if im wrong but swapable TPM is not common anymore in recent hardware, and most of it in old hardware spesifically on motherboard wich is there is litteraly connector to buy and swap your TPM but in recent newer hardware (motherboard) it was directly inside, and what im talking is only PC, laptop user dont had swapable TPM at all

  • @Remmyson2148
    @Remmyson2148 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What would riot do with our search history and information from our computer? ... they sell it... just like old school twitter did even though they said they wouldnt... they then got fined an amount less than they made in selling the information.... thats what riot can do. Note the people that would make this decision wouldnt necessarily be riot rather it would be their owner Tencent which is a chinese government backed company... Also if the playerbase is so unaware of all the hacking as described then perhaps the hackings isnt as impactful which begs the question if this is even
    needed?

  • @razamondo
    @razamondo หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    0:58 I went and watched to vod as Thor has been very outspoken about how much he dislikes kernel anti cheat and can confirm he still dislikes kernel level anti cheat because of the level of access it gives but he agrees with their methodology as he understands its the most efficient current method but that it will be bypassed eventually as with all anti cheat as its a continuous cat and mouse chase/tug of war that never ends between game devs and cheat devs and that he will just wait for the next iteration of anti cheat that will come after kernel when it inevitably gets bypassed.

    • @razamondo
      @razamondo หลายเดือนก่อน

      ahh he brings some of it up at the end of the video

    • @ddomekk38
      @ddomekk38 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Could you send a link? Cant find it anywhere

    • @razamondo
      @razamondo 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ddomekk38 on his piratesoftware channel go to his live tab, a Noita vod streamed on the 13th of april, that is 11:55:00 long. He starts talking about it at 6:45:53

  • @jpuc5568
    @jpuc5568 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very great thing to do as you have the most powerful minds in the world hacking and exposing vulnerabilities to you, you are also arming yourself with said power

  • @danieldani5922
    @danieldani5922 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In what Stream did Pirate Software go over the Vanguard Post? I am interested in what he says about it there.