COP28: King Charles says dangers of climate change are no longer distant risks | BBC News
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2023
- King Charles III has urged world leaders gathered in Dubai to make the COP28 climate summit a "turning point".
In a speech on the second day of the conference, the monarch warned that despite some progress "we remain so dreadfully far off track".
He called for "genuine transformational action", a day after the meeting opened with stark warnings on global warming.
The King said he has spent “a large proportion of my life trying to warn of the existential threats facing us over global warming, climate change and biodiversity loss”.
He said that despite this, decades later there is 30% more CO2 in the atmosphere now than back then, and almost more than 40% more methane.
Subscribe here: bit.ly/1rbfUog
For more news, analysis and features visit: www.bbc.com/news
#COP28 #ClimateChange #BBCNews
Rich people telling other folks why they should be happy barely scraping by. 👎
Absolute joke of a narrative.
As is this bloke! ✌️🤡
You wouldn't listen to a poor person either would you
Well I guess he could exercise his power and seize ownership of all the power companies, forcing them not to make record profits by increasing prices. And he could order the armed forces to reconquered former countries of the British Empire that are rich in natural resources.
@@SarthorShe has no such power. The government has all the power, he's just a figure head. A puppet of the state.
Do as we say, not as we do.
right👎👎👎
better still ignore everything they say, always and forever
@@PhyzzFizzWEF puppet
@@tommyhall6695 yep
Never do what they say.
70,000 attendees! How did they get there? The arrogance of these people!
@MatthewPlant05 never heard of zoom. This is the most polluting COP meeting ever. King Charles carbon footprint dwarfs a small nation.
@@MatthewPlant05 Obviously you've never heard of this thing called the internet, yet you've managed to comment on it without even noticing it exists, quite an achievement, no wonder you fall for the climate scam.
Then they will go back home to their Energy Sucking Mega Mansion with numerous bedrooms and bathrooms that nobody uses! Our governments have already handed us over to these Evil Elite Non-governmental organizations
So true
They want to bring all these ideas in and change the climate but they want us the public to pay for it. Why do the UK cabinet drive around in V8 petrol automatic Range Rover's the tell us to buy electric?
Their hypocrisy defies belief. It's like Red Nose day when rich "celebrities" tell the rest of us to dig deep and give what you can.
The king, the prime minister, and the chancellor of the exchequer all go to a conference and travel in separate planes. After all three of these champions of climate change end their weekend jolly they jump back on their choice of transport, each in his own plane and return to the jolly old uk and tell us all about "ZERO CARBON BLAH BLAH BLAH". 160 "dignitaries pitch up in their own form of transport, the local lads arrived by air conditioned camel all others flew in on ZERO CARBON planes. I have every confidence in these brilliant leaders.
Have you ever been to Israel by road?
Shows it's all a load of bollocks
Yeah he should ride there on a donkey?
@@steverichmond7142
They could've gone on a webcam ;)
@@steverichmond7142 only by el al, the food is better & the security is 1st class
It's certainly his favourite subject. But, our King runs 4 homes in England, 3 in Scotland and 1 in Northern Ireland.
Total hipocrite do as i say not what you want
Hundreds actually, boats, planes, cars
Not to mention he and others all flew there in their private jets. It's do as I say not as I do. They think we are all stupid. Yes raping the earth for resources is not new, but one energy option is not the answer. IMHO.
He doesn't though, the taxpayer runs them
I dont know why he's getting involved in this -he's making himself look even more silly.
"So I gave up my private jet"
Oh wait no I didn't
But he wants YOU to give up virtually everything.
@@thesmallnotesduo ole' Charles Richmond sausage fingers won't be giving up anything.
Agreed my friend but he's very willing to give up millions of 'his' citizens. Overpopulation and all that@@edgarfriendly5321
He made a speech 20 years ago saying that both our ice caps will have disappeared by 2015??? Still there i think.
They're bigger than ever.
@@lewtube6436 False. What is your source?
Did he? Where's your source?
Did he forget his speech the other day giving the green light to new oil and gas drilling in the north sea? Doesn't he know he has a larger carbon footprint than some countries!
you know that BP came up with the term 'carbon footprint' dont you?
@@PhyzzFizz I don't care who came up with the term. It doesn't stop it being a real thing. You are completely missing my point.... The hypocrisy of King Charles telling people to act now on climate change.
If people listen then it's worthwhile I guess, but I don't see him using his political power to act. Talking about the issue isn't getting us anywhere.
@@PaulWelsh you dont care because you brain has been fried by this no stop nonsense attack. just stop oil from making up popular slogans lol mug
@PaulWelsh using manufactured statistics to drive an agenda does not make it a real thing.
Although it is called the King's Speech, it is always written by the government! And has been for a very long time! HMK does not necessarily agree with its contents.
Is that why he chose to fly to COP using his private jet?
Did he really !!!!!?
Imagine him in the economy class of a passenger flight. You can't! Because private jets is how the higher class travel.
No, he used a boat and rows from UK to Dubai, stop spreading lies 😂
@@theresamcghee8362 And Sunak took one, and Cameron, all seperate, they couldn't get the RAF to fly them together.
The hypocrite could have used Zoom
Am I the only person who finds it insane when billionaires grill normal people about these issues? Gaslighting at its most cartoonish.
Cos it's all lies
Not at all - it's disgusting listening to these pampered and privileged billionaires and trillionaires preaching to us and robbing us at the same time. This overgrown spoiled brat is a perfect example of the parasite class.
And your opinion is worth more than a starving child's?
It's a criminal's Jerkoff. Getting away with a con gives them an orgasm!
I find it insane that anyone believes we can change the climate. Utterly absurd and a huge waste of money.
Do some research and it is easy to call this nonsense out. These people are the biggest hypocrites of all.
They are also untouchable and no law can take down the King 👑
Why, just why are these people travelling in private jets and at the same time asking us, the ones that have no the same means as they have, to make sacrifices.
Such level of hypocrisy is unbearable. 😔
They are the overclass. You vill eat ze bugz.
Windsor has lost it Village Idiot again ...
The finest education UK could provide and he turns out to be a lying
Thicko with NO knowledge of Science or Physics
Jug eared Tvvat
th-cam.com/video/jNd0HEvFWLs/w-d-xo.html
Because it’s all a scam on taxpayers who these people aren’t to provide tax credits & legislation to benefit Green Tech that will provide no real benefit !!
@@consultant2678A Celestial change of age that is currently occurring makes for a fine opportunity to tax and control the slaves under the guise of their Climate Change agenda.
People are too idle and distracted or side swiped by fear and virtue signalling to wake up.
Birthing pains as the New cyclical age comes in.
Let them eat cake
David Bellamy pity he ain't here anymore but loads of good people out there calling this out .
He was a good honest man. Today they have no voice sadly.
Top man he was but because he spoke out against it he got cancelled
He was wef aswell I'm affraid
Bellamy was a star. He called all this bs out at the very beginning and paid a very heavy price for it.
A man of such wealth & privilege could not be more unsuited to taking up any cause about the future of humanity.
The hypocrisy is off the scale.
Your issue is that you think someone can be a "wrong person" to promote a good cause. Hypocrisy is not good but it's better than this message not being shared. The King may have privilege and wealth but that does not make him unsuitable here. His word is listened to by the millions, let him speak. He's devoted his life to public service and he cares deeply about this cause. He's more suitable than most.
@@iilluminumooconfirmed1676 He hasn’t ‘devoted his life to public service’. He inherited the position. If he really wanted to serve his public & the planet he could downsize his financial empire.
@@cushyglen4264 like you would give up an inheritance. Be realistic.
He didn't ask to be where he is.
Well said. Their days are numbered. The wonderful irony in this all is that it is they who will be ‘reset’.
@@paulgibbons2320 Apologists like yourself are part of the bigger problem.
Meanwhile back in England I'm freezing my butt off, and can barely afford energy bills.
Sounds like a you problem 😂 😮!!
'The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants' - Albert Camus
Meaning what with regards to the speech?
Camus was a guy who cheated on his wife so much that she ended up in a psychiatric hospital. Celebrate and emulate him as much as you want, don’t expect people to find someone credible because they’re quotable
- Person with an opinion
Nice one.
@@public.publictyranny will do whatever they can to try n show they support us. When they don’t give a damn
@@ErenYega747you have to separate the artist from his work. He wrote things that will inspire generations for generations to come.
Here's a man with multiple homes, cars, boats and planes that are used regularly by him his family and entourage, with a holiday Castle in Balmoral with 50,000 acres telling us we are the problem for using more than we need, unbelievable hypocrisy!
I have little doubt that he flew their by private jet.
Of course. You don’t pay tax on private jet fuel.
Why would this point be so necessary? So you listen to the speech? Are you jealous? What a bad human being you are? Or shit?
He's the Prince of Davos, not the King of England.
He isn't the king of England. He's the king of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. There hasn't been a king or queen of England since 1707. Try and catch up, Eeyore.
@@markcynic808 Neither is apt, so it's fine, Zebedee.
@innovirtua
The mental incontinence is strong in you, oh braying one. Some food for thought, 🥕.
@markcynic808 who cares?! We get his point
@poolplayerpoolplayer7430
I care, and that's all that matters. I dislike ignorance and those, like yourself, that believe such ignorance deserves to be defended.
King Charles should be giving China his Klaus Schwab speech.
even more so india - they are peddling russian oil to the west at hudreds of billions in profits
Why?
Man who travels by helicopter and has over 200 bedrooms in various palaces around the country whilst accepting millions of dollars in cash payments, stuffed into supermarket bags from oil shieks tells us how serious climate change is and how the people are going to have to make sacrifices. I feel a South Park episode coming.
Exactly
At least someone is. After living in Key West Florida for 28 years, it's pretty obvious anyway.
Plus gaining peoples assets who die without making a will, and have no family. Disgusting.
Yes - and the overgrown, pampered, sheltered, spoiled brat isn't even bothered by his own hypocrisy.
Keep whining😂
he got to Dubai in private jet yeah piss off with this
I came here on my private jet to preach about climate change. 😂
I don't believe you own a private jet.
@@public.publicNo, he travels on flying carpets.
It's not the jet that is the problem. They collect money for cleaning the lakes, rivers and ocean and don't clean the environment like they promised to. They don't remove chemicals from the food supply and water or provide adequate water treatment plants. All the world leaders, not just this British leader. Psalm 2
OOh an insy winsy small mind, nice to met ya.
Did you listen to Him
Hi BBC can you do a breakdow of the carbon footprint to host this event including all the flights and also of the war in ukraine, Libya, Iraq and afghanistan?
They use Carbon offset by planting a tree to cover themselves about flying alone in a jet.
Boring Charles flies in on his own Private Jet
Fishi Sunak flies in on his own private jet
Boring William flies in on his own private jet
Because they know its all just a big con
You are correct sir
I'm glad to say the majority of the general public have got more common sense and they won't fall for this nonsense
You mean the bumpkins who believe conspiracy theorists and corrupt politicians over scientists?
So 'common sense' to you is ignoring the global scientific consensus? Frankly, common sense is overrated. Global warming is not intuitive, it requires complex analysis of data.
Which part is nonsense?
@@axelbruv
Climate emergency and netzero
@@axelbruv The part where they pretend humans can control an ever changing world climate with millions of variables, many of which we dont know about or understand, just by reducing CO2, how about that little part?
It is barely above freezing here today in Aberdeen. I have just been for a walk along the coastal path and with my binoculars I counted 115 offshore wind turbines. Not one of them was turning due to there being no wind. Apparently the answer is to have even more wind turbines which will stand absolutely still on the very days when we need more electricity. Someone really has not thought this through.
@andrewdalziel4006 Cambusbarron Stirling Minus 1 Cent @14.45
Electricity is stored.Jeez do some research.
Solar panels..that'll surely work great in a country where it's usually pissing with rain 80% of the time.
Not only that, but the blades go into land fill.
We need WAVE POWER
A 30% increase of carbon when it's only 0.04 % of the atmosphere is not a lot but most of it can be attributed to the dignitaries gathered in the once desolate fishing port of Dubai for the COP28.
He blatantly lied,when he said CO2 had increased by 30%
A/ It's still a trace gas at 0.042% (420ppm)
B/ The warming effect trails off to almost zero past 300ppm, according to a science paper from Prof William Happer
C/ CO2 levels were dangerously low in 1870 at 280ppm. If that had continued to 150ppm, the plants would suffocate. We saved the planet by man's contribution.
No, he is correct. He's not saying that the proportion of CO2 has increased from 0.03% to 30.03%, he is saying the absolute proportion of CO2 has increased by 30% so from 0.03% to 0.04%
@@stevec6427 Well, it's disingenuous. He's "spent his life" trying to warn us. He's what, 70? Some warning. CO2 has been far far higher. Net Zero is the true step to population collapse.
@stevec6427 the plants will love the increase in co2
@@P05BMR5Q no it does not work like that. They can't suddenly process more CO2 just because it's present. You need more plants to process more CO2.
If they are destroyed in wild fires. We have less. The science is not bullshit. Try listening to it.
Let him use his own money then if he feels sensitive about these things since him and his have done quite well out of modern society, frankly I could not care less about any of these things much less feel like paying for any of them.
No he hasn't. A hundred years ago he would have been an emperor in control of 1/4 of the world.
The hug a tree brigade personified ! and a great friend of the WEF. Does anyone actually take anything this guy says seriously ??? They have spent hundreds of years very successfully perfecting their public image, and they've done a great job ?????? " All that glitters isn't gold "
I am a tree hugger going back to the 70s. I have made a fortune out of sustainable profits. You are obviously working for Big Oil. Despicable. I take him very seriously having worked in the polluted oil fields of Nigeria.
Are you not even listening to David Attenborough either? Or to the many scientists warning us?
Charles used to say that his plants used to grow faster, if he talked to them, until he found out he was breathing CO2 onto them lol.
From a man who hasn’t done a hard days work in his life telling us to work every day not go anywhere ,no car , no holidays turn heating off and no meat .
Would those 'mitigations' happen to be less people? Maybe a world population of 500 million by any chance?
Or why don’t we go back to being in thousands, so that we can live like hunter gatherers without need for agriculture…
It doesn't need to be less people, just reducing our reliance on fossil fuels would help massively and would be achievable. Relying entirely on a resource which rockets in price every time there is a war in the most unstable part of the world isn't working out too well. We need massive investment in nuclear, tidal, wind and solar all of which are cheaper and not subject to the same price fluctuations
@@ashishvatsavai6982 The elites will still need their slaves to do the heavy lifting so they can live in luxury.
Population is beginning to decline ... Japan as an example
thats what theyre aiming for a 90 percent reduction
Not a mention of the various Weather Control technologies being used ! Such as the extensive Chemtrails , shown to make forest/bush fires explosive and uncontrolable . Or the various agencies and companies that boast of redirecting atmospheric currents .
Many of the fear engendering events cited , coincide with weather control systems starting , or being used .
The average person doesn’t look into the information that you’re referring to… I know exactly what you’re talking about and I agree completely. This gathering of people is akin to devil worshipping cult.
Your delusions are so crazy that even Hollywood couldn't make them into a movie without people thinking it's too ridiculous.
Why would a criminal tell the truth ?
@@matt79hz Why should anyone care what a dumb peasant has to say?
Tell him to lead by example ,then we will follow ,but we know he’s not going to do that
I'm not aware of him owning massive fossil fuel corporations. In fact, by the things he has said over the decades, he would more likely be into renewables and eco work.
@@SarthorSthe things he's SAID, not done. You don't see the backroom deals with oil sheikhs
@@SarthorS Yes he can afford to do it ….also he could take a train instead of a private jet but he doesn’t want to do it ,because it’s inconvenient for him , and doesn’t suit his elitist lifestyle, but it’s okay if NetZero is inconvenient for the rest of us
@SarthorS But he's also a supporter of homeopathy, which is scientific nonsense. He has no scientific legitimately. That said, he's not wrong, I just think he is entirely the wrong person to say it.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 He's a huge public figure. He is better suited to saying it than nameless scientists. So long as he passes on actual science, it's fine. And yes, no one should listen to him if he starts babbling about homeopathy, but he isn't talking about that garbage.
From the man who makes a helicopter trip (on average) every other day. Sacrifice is for the plebs!
I have been on the earth in England for 65 years. The summer is still hot ( most of the time ( and the winter is still cold ) and politicians, yeomen, scribes and notaries still spout hypocritical s- - t -.
According to my old man, climate change doesn't effect England when I pointed this fact out to him.🤣😂
Your personal anecdotal experience is worthless compared to the mountains of data that proves, beyond doubt, that global warming is rapid and real.
A political King cannot be a constitutional monach at the same time.
It's right wing political parties that have turned scientific fact into political opinion.
@aanttz4803 He isn't King. The Bernician posted on You Tube 5 th August 2020 Appears Parliaments Deposed QE II of Sovereignty, Face like a smacked arse, I've worked out it happened ON or just before SHE entered Parliament minus the I.S.C. lying on a wee table by HER side 14 th October 2019. Explains why Charlie wasn't Crowned with it , but had it on HIS Head when emerging from behind drapes.
We need to get rid of the " royal family" we have little gimps like Andrew who are protected because they are "royal".
Nothing party political about exercising your survival instinct.
We kind of need him given the clown like state of our government these days.
There was once a king who believed he could command the sea to not come in.
This time the sheeple meekly obey.
If you are talking about Canute, he knew he couldnt command the sea to stop. He was making a point lol
SPOILER ALERT... he drowned!
And the one that had a bacon as a best friend?!! Jimmy Jimmy!!! ✌️🤡
@@retiredbore378 There's no point talking facts to climate change deniers. If they cared about the truth, they wouldn't be CCD's.
LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ??? ALONE ??? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I thought he said that he wasn't going to get into politics when he became King
Global warming shouldn't be political. It's not remotely controversial in scientific circles, only by politicians who see it as a threat and inconvenience.
He may not have been telling the truth 😊
It's another "read my lips" moment.
And he picked the WRONG politics.
In other words poor people have to change their ways, but the rich (the problem) do not!
Just shows how many lies you can tell while sounding sincere.
It's called an "interglacial period". They never tell you that do they.
How could they pretend to save us if they told us the truth? C'mon.
A Klaus Schwab speech.
"warmest temperature on record"
75% of those global thermostats in weather stations are inside urban heat islands, in cities, large towns and next to runways.
Who are they trying to fool?
and the cheating baskets are using ground temperatures instead of air temperatures
Absolutely false. The measurements are carefully controlled and standardised.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 Yes, carefully controlled and standardised. I would add to that carefully located too, inside urban heat islands. The variant between urban and rural setting can be much as 6C warmer during day and night by 8C.
@Sjb-on5xt Nonsense. The weather stations are not placed to skew the data, and differences in urban/rural areas is accounted for. Besides, there are many, many stations at sea where these factors do not exist.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 Many were placed there years ago in rural settings, in orchards and green fields. Some placed near 2miles of concrete runways for pilots to use. Then over time the towns and cities encroached around them. Whatever reading you get from them now is corrupted. So they should either be relocated or exclude them from the global average. The fact that they include this corrupted data shows what a con it is.
What a wonderful example he sets! 😂😂😂 This emperor has no clothes 😮
Don't place Faith in this world 🌎 place your hope and faith in Jesus
I do hope his private jet supplies levels of comfort befitting of a king.
It would be do sad to see him have to choose between eating and keeping his kids warm like some of us do.
Such an inspiration.
Wishing you well with your litterpicking, recycling, upcycling, thrift shop donations, horticulture, fuel limitation, beach clean ups, hazardous chemical control, supporting local shops and reaping natures harvest etc...
Why - as he's supposed to stay out of politics and remain neutral in all things - is he even there? He was told not to go last time.
They could have hosted the whole thing on Teams. It's just a Jolly for the overrated power holders
Since when did King Charles become a scientist, He failed his eleven plus, didn't he?
he once stood in a dustbin, may be he should get back in one
Weather modification..
King Charles the Third lecturing us commoners on our Carbon Footprint is as absurd as his ancestor Henry the Eighth giving marriage guidance!
Your lecture is worse than useless.
Let’s start with
No more wars !!
No one can deny the effect on the environment .
Put the same Investment into the economy instead of war . Quite simple really.
Couldn't they have had a zoom conference, and having it in Dubai one of the biggest oil producers there is...or was that intentional to drive the message home?
My Carbon Footprint is around 20% of the UK average per capita.
What is Charlie's personal footprint?
What is the average Carbon Footprint of those attending COP28?
IF we really do need to work towards a zero Carbon future, the wealthiest people should first reduce their CO2 contributions to my level!
No wonder his mum never wanted to hand over the crown
Just 96 months to save world, says Prince Charles 2009
We have 18 months to save world, Prince Charles warns Commonwealth leaders 2019
Prince Charles: we have 18 months to save human race 2019
How may years or months does it give it now.?
1:12 " I pray with all my heart." and worship myself.
There is a lot of whinging in the comments but this is a good speech and these are important points.
Then why do you have a BBC bot's username then?
Exactly. Like him or not, what the king said is true. The king shouldn't stick his head in the sand and neither should we.
This is a political position and the King should not be engaged in politics. He is flouting the constitution. The problems and policy reaction to climate change is a matter for political debate which his government ministers are there to conduct in parliament. If he wants to promulgate climate change policies, he should give up the crown.
Thing is, most members of the public *are* very concerned of climate change. It’s not like it’s divisive rhetoric like other things.
It’s a matter for all life on Earth! This isn’t about policy?! This transcends politics! What an absurdly moronic comment!
@MaxAndrew no there not.
@MaxAndrew it's left wing propaganda!!
@@poolplayerpoolplayer7430 Imagine thinking caring about the environment is propaganda. 😂
Time to make Britain a REPUBLIC
Booo!
Because modern military ammunition has a shelf life ; Not more than nine years; This means that it must be made for a specific task , and it should not be stored randomly ; waiting for an event to happen ?
The earth belongs to God
No no, we must mine it for all the metals to please the climate change cult or we are all doomed.... to listen to more of these ignorant speeches!
Amen
Charles has never done a days hard work in his life, but he owns so much.
that means he had powerfull grand daddies
I think you are jealous, you don’t have your parents maybe, you don’t raise children maybe, you are a slut?
Extinction rates (1500-2009) peaked around 1900 at 50 per decade. Extinction rates have declined dramatically to around 4 to per decade in the 2000s. So the extinction rate is very low: 900 known lost species for 2.1 million known species in 500 years (IUCN), so from observations there are an average of slightly less than 2 species lost every year. Out of a known species total of over 2 million. That gives an annual percentage loss of less than 0.0001%. That's background extinction. At that frequency it will take over 930,000 years to reach 80% extinction of species experienced at the K-T boundary that saw the extinction of the dinosaurs. Of course, extinction is a natural part of the evolution of life on this planet with the average lifespan of a species thought to be about 1 million years (cf 930,000). It is estimated that 99.9% of all plant and animal species that have existed have gone extinct. It should also be noted that no families or genera have become extinct in the last 500 years. In fact marine diversity at the taxonomic level of families is the highest it has ever been in the Earth's long history (see Sepkoski Curve). In a review of 16,009 species, most populations (85%) did not show significant trends in abundance, and those that did were balanced between winners (8%) and losers (7%) (Dornelas et al, 2019). There have been only 9 species of continental birds and mammals confirmed extinct since 1500 (Loehle, 2011). No global marine animals have become extinct in the past 50 years (McCauley et, 2015 using IUCN data).
There is no climate crisis.
How dare you use facts
Basing climate problems on extinction rates over hundreds of years is a very inaccurate way of understanding this issue. For one thing, conservation efforts have ramped up considerably in recent times, and so many species are protected from full extinction. This is not to say that huge swathes of the natural world is not is trouble - it is.
@hgbnkbggj2915 There are areas of the natural world experiencing difficulties, but these are no due to a global man-made climate crisis, because that does not exist.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 Using data from observations would seem to be the best way to understand this issue.
@@OldScientist Obviously! But not only from extinctions from the reasona above. It massively misrepresents the issue.
Our overlords don't mind flying private jets to join climate summit nonsense talks.
You realize that this is a trick to get you to ignore what they are actually saying, right? Like Republicans saying 'they want to take your guns away' to stop people listening to those talking about sensible gun control laws in the US.
Losing the support of many of his 'subjects'. Never had a seconds monetary worry or concern about everyday worries of his subjects.He really needs someone to enlighten him about everyone's concerns and worry.(if anyone dare).
That's not his job. That's the job of his government. And we were the ones who voted in the people who control it.
@sheilagill8385 i'm still wondering what Deal he had to make with Parliament in order to sit on the Throne.
*Shame his best friend Jimmy can’t see him now.* 😢
*Luckily his brother Andrew is here for him.* 👌🏼
those 3 together could save the world with all their special youth work
@@PhyzzFizz 💀
Why do you continue to reference a renowned ***ophile in your comments? Your ongoing interest in JS is disquieting.
He goes on to say the earth does not belong to us, which is true irony given that this is coming from the head of the royal family whose entire wealth and indeed the platform thereby from which he seeks to lecture the rest of us is based upon the premise that all land ultimately belongs to the king.
Yes, even the ground your own house sits upon.
It did not take long for KC to turn his back on his mothers teachings to interfere in politics did it?
In reality climate alarmism is the latest version of Plato's Noble lie, promoted in our generation to protect and extent the privileges of the Davos elite anf elite wannbes. Professor of phiysics ( Emeritus) Princeton University. William Happer.
It ties in with the vax,QR codes,Biometrics,Digital ID, Digital Currency and funky Claus.
Those illuminati boys are rascals aren't they?
Cheers.
Such heart felt words from a man who takes a separate private jet from his counterpart who lives in the same city.
Billions of people have their own private car and don’t take the bus. We ALL are guilty. Charles is in a role that commands the highest security and that means he has to have his own private vehicles. It’s not even his choice.
@@twyscapeso!
non of us are prefect, I still use pastic bag and look at my spelling.
The majority of Canada's wild fires were human caused no by nature. The carbon has been regreening the planet, plants thrive with increased cabon and in turn they give back oxygen.
doing his paymasters bidding, why is a king being political, Klaus will be proud
2 Krauts together.
He's not the one who decided to turn scientific fact into political opinion. And he's not the one who is in the pay of anyone. That would be the right wing politicians who you follow.
@@SarthorS Unfortunately for you, the right has facts on it's side, the models he is promoting have already been demonstrated to be wrong by real world data, unlucky.
define right wing@@SarthorS
@@dannypickering7360 Depends on where you are. In most first world countries, right wing would mean generally preferring the status quo, generally preferring money over people, generally preferring less government and more free market.
In the US, dial that up many times and add in Christian extremism, denial of certain sciences, demonisation of socialism, anti-education, anti universal healthcare and welfare programs and massively pro gun. Also throw in a hefty does of nationalism.
That's laying it on thick of course, but you have a significant amount of the right wing that are like that.
There is only one King....and this is not Him!!!
That thou art.
@@homosapienssapiens4848 fool on the hill......
The difference is, this king exists.
@@SarthorS .....you are so stupid underground.....
Jesus is God, He exists, I've met him. He won't put up with this nonsense. He said "it [climate change] is an excuse not to help the poor"
Who is getting tired and HATEFUL of these ELITE PSYCHOS
💯
Does anyone know what the first loss risk guarantees he mentions at 07:10 are?
use your imagination. what does it sound like? probably connected to later comments about insurance. Hope of the World. Insurance. Might be. Julian Assange thinks about setting up insurance policies against war. I'm far from convinced but these ideas are in the air.
What a shame we have either a liar or a deluded King.
He’s a WEF puppet , therefore a liar 😮
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo
Me thinks you are bang on point.
Well maybe if you brought down your own carbon footprint that would be a start! What a hypocrite!
Just think if this man campaigned for honest labeling on foods we could all choose if we wish to buy meat raised in Britain or failing that the nearest suppliers to save on transportation pollution. If we are not given this information how can we shop responsibly. Also how about campaigning for ready meals containing products such as mash potatoes and preformed chips which have had the potato starch removed for its usefulness in forming other meat products to make those apparently oh so nice so called deli slice thinner than a piece of paper. Start there Mr. Windsor with honest food labelling. Stop the rise in Value extended products especially those which contain cellulose/added gluten/potato starch etc.
Make children's menus in restaurants etc. contain real foods and not low grade mechanically recovered products. Children deserve a better start in life than this chemically and mechanically manipulated food.
Cleaning emissions and making use of wool and other natural fibres would be a better use of money. Plastic clothing is cheap but it sure ain't healthy.
The planet is not at risk, it will be here long after it gets rid of us as a scourge, it is us at risk and the science community have destroyed the food chain right round the world. The science community needs to be reigned in and made to work on improving our food production methods and not for the profits of Big Pharma.
And for goodness sake Mr. Windsor a Zero Carbon future would be the death of us all as the planet would not be able to support life.
Brilliant totally agree 👍
Why not send your comments to The Rt Hon Mark Spencer MP, the Minister of State (Minister for Food, Farming and Fisheries)?
Your sentiments are (generally) admirable, but you are lambasting the wrong man!
Wishing you well with your own personal efforts to save the planet - litterpicking, recycling, upcycling, thrift shop donations, horticulture, fuel limitation, beach clean ups, hazardous chemical control, supporting local shops and reaping natures harvest etc...
We ALL have a part to play.
I totally agree we should all do our part, But of course we all like to talk about, it but none like to actually check out these things for themselves and then act accordingly. One visit to my local authority land infill/re-cycling plant on their open day was very informative not for what was said but more for what was not said, the actual layout and signs used for vehicles appeared to have their own story to tell. It was a very interesting couple of hours well spent.
I find it interesting that you think that complaining to the Min of Ag would be correct, or an effect way to go to try and get waste products getting in preformed and mechanically recovered foods removed. This is the dept which is actively promoting the use of extended value products in general and the modern more they tell you labelling the more vague is the actual labelling of food. That wonderful use of cellulose in foods, which due to the properties of dehydration is always listed on the labelling at its dry weight and appears to be only a small part of the contents, where as once you rehydrate it to its normal moist state it is the no 1 ingredient. Needless to say they never state what the cellulose or it's origins are.
It is the min of ag that supervises and allows the majority of imported meat to be sold under the false labeling of British meat. Encourages fish farming which is one of the most horrendous industries ever invented.
All this and more to avoid farming in a sustainable way in keeping with nature, We build cars but do not include air cleaning filters in the design of the cars to clean the air as the car is being driven. Why would we after all we buy cars for speed and looks and not the ability to clean up the air they are polluting.
We know we need to clean up after ourselves but currently it is the same people who are responsible for the dirty air who also control the use and applications of the laws.
So who does that leave? Who is above such matters and can be considered anything like neutral enough to have a real impact on modern day pollution rackets and believe you me much of it is a racket with lots of grants and others monies available to those who wish to manipulate the system.
Throwing money at these industries will not solve the problems of pollution. It is a moral issue and can only start to get somewhere when we start to consider it a moral problem. Companies which used public water need to be obligated to return clean water back into the system after they have cleaned it up. A pulp mill which does not clean up the water it uses is just abusing lax laws which allow it to just pour it waste into the waterways and left to the tax payer to pay the costs of a cleanup after a disaster or whatever which is about the only time clean ups really seem to happen.
Meanwhile the increase in polluted foods is ever growing and humans from the poorer communities pay the price, the rise in coeliac disease which is almost at plague levels, auto immune diseases and other areas which are very very related to the modern food productions methods. In effect we are using poor people and the undereducated who are easy to influence through advertising as recycling plants. The lungs of pedestrians which currently are the only ongoing air cleaning filters of the the air in many major towns and cities.
There is more to the pollution problems than plastic and fossil fuels - first we need to work out what pollution is - And I ain't never seen a good all encompassing definition of what constitutes modern day pollution. Until we can work out the difference between pollution and by products we are on a none starter,
.
@@shawroberts5149
People in attendance gently tossing captain crunch as the King passes by.
*As is tradition.*
So the British taxpayers have to cough up again, why doesn’t the wealthy royal family give some money,
Usual BS........
GOP - Short for People deciding which bugs you'll be eating.
I vote YES to saving the planet.
I vote NO to green taxation.
So you're happy if other people save the planet for you, so long as you don't have to life a finger or change anything about the way you live?
@@SarthorS That's a cynical way to flip it. You could be even more cynical and question the motives of these involved. It's a meeting exclusive to millionaires and people motivated by money, wealth and property.
You could come to the conclusion as many have, they are simply motivated by greed and are simply finding creative ways to justify ever increasing taxation.
Which you certainly can back up looking at their previous patterns of behaviour.
The rich have benefitted the most by ransacking the earth for resources to sell. The Oil industry particularly.
Is it not right that they should shoulder a large/larger proportion of the cost of resolving the problem of our damaged environment.
Why is the solutions these rich people come up with always involve squeezing more cash from those already entrenched in poverty?
I do personally believe some of the science. Fore sure. But I don't believe green taxes provide an ethical way to resolve it.
@@SarthorS The systems in place did not think twice about entering my bank account to ceise money to recover 'Child Support' Debt. (Fictitious I might add)
I don't understand why they are not equally comfortable raiding the bank accounts of billionaires and millionaires to save the planet.
Raiding my bank account changed what I eat for my dinner. You go from eating meat and vegetables to tins of beans. If you raided the bank accounts of say Jeff Bessos or Bill Gates.
It would not change anything at all.
They are comfortable raiding the banks of people who have nothing.
But not people who have wealth beyond comparison. It is never a solution which is on the table.
Its a sociotal double standard.
@@paulgibbons2320 I don't necessarily disagree with you, and I'm not being cynical. I just tend to see the flaws or falsehoods in things people say. If they have a good enough answer to the problems I point out, backed by real evidence, then I won't help but agree with them.
This rarely happens though. I mean, it's the internet. Most people just post the first thing to enter their head, or worthless talking points, without giving it any actual thought. Your reply is, at least, coherent.
Those with wealth and power have always controlled the world, and even with democracy, it's still true to a great extent. I do agree with you that these sort of people are the ones most responsible for the climate problem. But I also know that your and my opinion are utterly worthless and will have absolutely zero impact on the course of events. But at least we are not turning people against the cause like the Just Stop Oil idiots.
@@SarthorS seeing the flaws an falsehoods in what people say is A very good discription of cynicism lol 😂 but I don't consider it a negative discriptor. Don't worry I'm happy for you to be cynical.
Most people don't have the time or inclination to fully express themselves online.They see it as a waste of time. This probably makes them smarter than people who do waste time on line.
That's not an indicator that their thoughts on an issue are not well founded. Think more kindly of people.
The environmentalists of just stop oil are funded by the oil company's and are been used to make a mockery of the issue.
Don't underestimate what a dirty game that is been played out in the media. The just stop oil protesters have the right message. But dark forces won't let you support it.
Be kinder to people. 👍
I just hope that we see some kind of real action because I have witnessed precious little being done in the UK over the last 12 months.
Climate change🤣😂 When I was a wee boy it was called seasons.
Seasons werent making enough money.
I'll say it because nobody else will *'The King has got no clothes on'*
🤣
You are both obviously far right. 😅
@@philipparker1319 🤣suppose you know what that means? No laughter allowed.
@@philipparker1319And that would make you woke.
@@philipparker1319if you are including me in the "both" in your post, so I can begin to try to understand your point can you please:
1. Explain your reasoning?
2. Define what you mean by "far right"?
Thanks
The UK is responsible for only 0.9% of global co2 emissions.
Even if the UK managed to stop this 0.9% , 99.1% of emissions come from other countries.
China , US, and India are the ones who can make the difference. Meanwhile in the UK we are subject to ever increasing green taxes on the energy we all use. Where are these taxes going?
The tories stopped subsidies for solar and just about killed the industry a decade or so ago. Every roof could be generating power. The roof of every supermarket , a missed opportunity. With battery storage a huge necessary industry was hobbled by the tories , now they are taking coal fired power stations out of mothballs to fill up the shortfall in our energy generation. And we pay GREEN TAXES FOR THAT?
They think the world revolves around western politics. It’s truly stupid.
I have to pay £12.50 a day in London to drive as I can’t afford a new car. 😢
Watching these people makes me feel physically sick 🤢
If these people really cared about climate change, they would be investing heavily in Tesla. Instead, Bill Gates shorted Tesla....
Would it not be more appropriate for the king to stay at home and show some leadership?
Yes if he believed any of the words coming out of his mouth.
This is about control and profit.
That was a lot of hot air. Blah blah blah blah. Don't look up.
Says the richest person in Britain with the biggest houses. Absolute hypocrisy
Yawn. Still waiting for someone to show me a rise in sea levels, i live at sea level and it hasnt moved at all. And as sea level is universal, it cannot rise in one place and not in another.
Hello
Very good!! ❤
He’s always so well dressed!
Doesn’t he have people to help him wash & dress? More to cook his meals, more to drive his limousines, more to clean his many palaces, more to write his speeches. Yet he walks with such assurance, quite independently, without any visible support. What a guy! 😮😮😮
He also has over a dozen navies, armies, air forces, governments and a vast array of police forces. What is your point?
Even as the toothpaste put on his toothbrush for him…
@@nevrobinson8530that was when he had broken his arm, years ago. Do keep up.
Guys, guys... The Desert is experiencing a drought...
And bad forestry management caused wildfires..
The people in the room caused it so....
Is the British people willing to have a political king carrying out a private agenda. I thought the Royal family was supposed to be non political? Did I get it wrong? Hypocrisy