Why Humans Are Frugivores

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 76

  • @DuarteAntunes1998
    @DuarteAntunes1998 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You're Right Bro, nuts are desirable too

  • @unusuallyordinary
    @unusuallyordinary 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Eating meat is a learned behavior. You will never find a child that wants to hurt an animal!

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      100%

    • @unusuallyordinary
      @unusuallyordinary 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mikem4481 A child's logic is still better than no logic.

    • @cottonycircle4640
      @cottonycircle4640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mikem4481 no kid would want to eat raw meat but most kids love fruit. Every animal follows its intuititio

    • @KK-lg8uz
      @KK-lg8uz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      seems like we've been learning that behaviour for 3.4 million years. Thats a lot of learning

    • @unusuallyordinary
      @unusuallyordinary 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KK-lg8uz We were foragers long before we learned how to kill and eat animals.

  • @My80sWorld
    @My80sWorld 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can I have a list of tender leaves vegetables good for humans you mentioned?

  • @NextLevelFitness7
    @NextLevelFitness7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love the idea of this but why can’t we get all the nutrients we need from a fruitarian diet? Why are fruitarians often deficient and led to meat? Why do fruitarians lose sex drive? How much fruit would a person need to eat to be healthy?

    • @justice4all529
      @justice4all529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We can get everything from fruit .
      You are assuming we need a continuous sex drive..

    • @lokomotive28
      @lokomotive28 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@justice4all529 i was fruitarian and same happened to me and i lost 2 teeth , eyebrow turned white hasn’t turned back

    • @helenalovelock1030
      @helenalovelock1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fruit doesn’t even give humans the essential macro nutrient … protein.
      Fruit contains non essential macros.

    • @niamhmckinney4027
      @niamhmckinney4027 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@lokomotive28that's awful. No doubt you were told by the fruitarian community that it was all "detox".

    • @KK-lg8uz
      @KK-lg8uz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lokomotive28 do the opposite and your health will improve loads. Humans evolved as obligate carnivores. Eat mostly meat. If you want proof of this check out the video by Barry Groves: Homo Carnivorus What We Are Designed to Eat

  • @freedomisoutside
    @freedomisoutside ปีที่แล้ว +3

    People on here are so upset when they should be thankful. Most people don’t find out this simple truth until they’re severely ill from literally eating everything BUT fruit.
    Nothing in nature cooks. We aren’t designed anything like carnivores, omnivores or even herbivores. Cooking makes it possible for humans to ingest foods they otherwise would not in a natural setting. Fruits are the only category of food that all humans can comfortably eat the full spectrum of. (no matter their blood type, ethnicity, orientation etc.). If you HAVE to cook it to comfortably consume it, obviously your ancestors didn’t always consume it & chances are didn’t start consuming it by choice but out of desperation due to migrations & lack of natural food source. Fruits are the only foods that don’t dehydrate the body. It’s really obvious when you put yourself in the shoes of ancient humans who did not spawn into existence with weapons, tools, recreational fire or a constant supply of clean water (outside of the naturally distilled water within fruit). *Cues “humans are atleast 70% water” quote*. Meat, dairy, starches, grains ALL dehydrate the body no matter if they are raw or cooked!

    • @niamhmckinney4027
      @niamhmckinney4027 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They "dehydrate" the body? Where is your proof for this statement? Also, why is it, then, that all long-term fruitarians I've seen look emaciated, depleted, pale, with sunken eyes and dark circles, and dried out looking skin? One particular couple comes to mind. They're in their 60s and look absolutely haggard, with very lined faces and almost scary eyes. They look long-term depleted and starved of nutrients.

  • @mmabagain
    @mmabagain 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The only diet my blood pressure stays low on is fruit. I have tried carnivore and my BP stays high. 150/100.

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mmabagainglad to hear that! a fruitbased diet is the true ancestral diet. Modern day ancestral diet dont examine 50 million years of primates living on fruits and greens as the overwhelming majority of our species diet. They just want to imate what desperate recent primates did at a time of no food and starvation in awful conditions.

  • @Insp.CountMortisWinshipKlaw
    @Insp.CountMortisWinshipKlaw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I went 100% raw fruit/green leafy veg 3.5 years ago to heal psoriasis. 17 years of god awful psoriasis gone in 18 months but I lost half of my hair within the first 6 months. I went completely bald by the third year. I cant seem to find an answer anywhere as to why this happened. I am male and when I bring this subject up it is dismissed like its nothing. It has caused me major depression.

    • @ana-mariaalrasul9231
      @ana-mariaalrasul9231 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It usually happens due to low calorie intake when going raw. What kind of baldness do you have? It could be autoimune baldness, thyroid baldness, male pattern baldness (google the difference). Check your ferritin, iron, hemoglobin, B12, vitamin D3, TSH, fT3, fT4, anti TPO, anti Tg.

    • @Julottt
      @Julottt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Iodine deficiency because soils are depleted and most fruits are picked too early.

    • @helenalovelock1030
      @helenalovelock1030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No where near enough protein which is an essential macronutrient. You will have been deficient in bioavailable nutrients.

    • @KK-lg8uz
      @KK-lg8uz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thats because humans are obligate carnivores, evidence of this stretches back 3.4 million years. Watch the video by Barry Groves: Homo Carnivorus What We Are Designed to Eat.

    • @KK-lg8uz
      @KK-lg8uz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thats because humans are obligate carnivores, evidence stretches back 3.4 million years. Watch Barry Groves: Homo Carnivorus What We Are Designed to Eat.

  • @MishaElRusito
    @MishaElRusito หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't eat meat and I'd love to eat just fruits but the fruits today are not even close to being as nutritious as the fruits even 100 years ago. The soil is polluted by all the chemicals, the GMO etc The only solution I think is to buy land far away from the roads and factories, deep in the nature and grow your own food.

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MishaElRusito I dont recommend "just fruits", you need greens on a fruitbased lifestyle for it to be sustainable. Regardless of what happens to the soil, our anatomy stays the same I.e primate designed for a pre tool, pre fire, pre tractor, pre pots and pan era - fruits and leafy greens.

    • @MishaElRusito
      @MishaElRusito หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fruitkid4759 🙌🙌🙌

  • @dianaalexdaniel
    @dianaalexdaniel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome, Video, so, True, have a Wonderful, March 1st, love, Diana Lipski a soon to be 12 years Vegan and I love this Loving Lifestyle ❤️ Raw is our Way for God 🙏

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You got this!

  • @FuryBlurry
    @FuryBlurry ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel it but we probably don't just like fruits we like alot of nuts too. Also if we in cold environment we probably won't find much fruits so we probably eat grains and beans. Plants the grow beneath the ground. We probably like to eat more whole grains and beans in the cold. Also it's more satifiing to eat grains as well 😋

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Frugivore means a large part but doesnt necessary mean exclusive.
      Nuts are healthy but in nature, would be difficult to access and excess leads to issues.
      I also dont think they as visually pleasing as fruits.
      Grains and beans can be a part of a healthy diet, however, we cant eat them raw and dont have them visually pleasing raw
      . So the point of the video is, we couldn't possibly be biologically designed to eat something we cant even eat in its raw form.
      Eat whatever you like though. Peace and love and veganism

    • @FuryBlurry
      @FuryBlurry ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fruitkid4759 Yup I feel it but we need to cook our food in a cold environment to warm up and survive unless your in the tropics and its hot all the time then your good. Plus cooking makes some food more bioavailable. Just my thoughts.

  • @Jewlz4ever
    @Jewlz4ever 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What do you think about that all prey animals have eyes on the sides of their heads (cows, birds, fish, etc.) so they can see their predators coming… but humans have front-facing eyes?

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I weigh that out towards the rest and see that the overwhelming majority of attributes point towards the same conclusion- frugivores

    • @Lonwolf.
      @Lonwolf. ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Gorillas, chimpanzees, and orangutans all have eyes in the front of their head as well, and they all eat a fruit-based diet.

    • @arh7303
      @arh7303 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is because primate ancestors were aboreal, (lived in trees), and so, they needed eyes in front to watch for branches. We developed hands for swinging and color vision for *detecting fruit *. So, we share front facing eyes with predators, but for a different reason, we evolved as tree dwelling fruit eaters. I learned this in anthropology 101. ❤

    • @Jewlz4ever
      @Jewlz4ever 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arh7303 I tried the fruit diet and my health suffered. I also believe in God, not evolution. Jesus ate fish.

    • @KK-lg8uz
      @KK-lg8uz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Lonwolf. gorillas only eat 5% fruit. They also ferment those plant fibers into short chain fatty acids. Maybe you weren't aware of this but herbivores basically absorb a high saturated fat diet from the fermentation of plant fibers. We cant do this to a large enough extent which is why we have to get these saturated fats from animal sources. The studies on saturated fat being casual of heart disease have been shown to be wrong, and contradicted by other studies showing its protective. Nutritional anthropologists have shown evidence of meat eating going back 3.4 million years. Meat is our natural human diet. Keep an open mind and watch the video by Barry Groves: Homo Carnivorus What We Are Designed to Eat

  • @TheInterestingInformer
    @TheInterestingInformer ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fruits are an important part of the human diet, more so than most animals. However it’s important to note that eating ONLY fruit is dangerous for your health, and if you want to stay healthy be sure to include grains, legumes, and other vegetables!

    • @TheInterestingInformer
      @TheInterestingInformer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      all due respect thats rubbish and dangerous misinformation.
      @@EiaGoddess

    • @TheInterestingInformer
      @TheInterestingInformer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@EiaGoddess fruits are packed with sugar, fiber, water, and some vitamins and minerals. You WILL die of kwashiorkor’s or from the result of insufficient fatty acid chain consumption.
      I seriously hope for your sake you aren’t solely eating fruits, but also if you genuinely believe breathing air will satiate your caloric and nutritional needs, I can see the effects of your diet has already cause some deterioration of your mental state.
      I wish you all the best!

    • @TheInterestingInformer
      @TheInterestingInformer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EiaGoddess 🫥

  • @efehansahin2172
    @efehansahin2172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cause baboon also eat berries!

  • @nishiki393
    @nishiki393 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good to see you Clinton... and you make an interesting point here!

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why thank you :) what’s your fav fruit ?

    • @nishiki393
      @nishiki393 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fruitkid4759 hard to say ck, but some top choices that come to mind immediatly are **strawberries**, blueberries, watermelon, nectarines, persimmons, and 1 type of mango (the one you DON'T have to wait until very soft, I like the multi-colored one), and apples, especially ones like a good Honeycrisp). It's hard to imagine a world w/o bananas though, yet I know we risk that w/monoculture disease, etc).
      Other melons, when really good ones are selected, are also awesome.
      I don't know what that long one in your thumbnail is, lol. I know there are like oodles more types of fruit that most of us have never even heard of/seen that are not commerical crops... sad. One such one is colloqually called a Strawberry Tree, and we have several of them on our HOA grounds. I have long read and heard they edible, but a neighbor from France says they are there and she says (and demonstrated) she eats them, so I tried a few too. Not as delectable as they look, but still interesting, and so neat to just pick and eat from nature like that. I have one that grows next to my deck, so I can even pluck some occassionally from there now. Instead of ruing the mess they make, I can enjoy them now, lol.
      Now you rue the day you ask me a question, lol ;-)

    • @nishiki393
      @nishiki393 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fruitkid4759 here is a picture of a Strawberry Tree... very interesting and alluring fruit... best when in final ripe stage, when red I've found from trying:
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbutus_unedo

    • @nishiki393
      @nishiki393 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      goes from yellow, to orange, to red, as you might imagine

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nishiki393 yea its tough to pin down a favorite when there are so many to choose from. that strawberry tree one looks super interesting. kinda looks like a vibrant lychee. so the taste didnt match what you were expecting? ive had similar experience with some fruits, but think i didnt eat them ripe or they contained 90% seed to edible fruit ratio and i was put off lol

  • @efehansahin2172
    @efehansahin2172 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you eat fruit only. You pick up every tiny thing your teacher or friend did to you. I even saw them in my dreams. Sort of healing from micro injuries.
    When you eat rice you go like "what?". 😄 And you show up in their dreams.
    My point: there is no point I enjoy both diets. Depends on how my mood is👏

    • @dj-fe4ck
      @dj-fe4ck 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same with me. If I had to choose between one or the other, than definitely starches

    • @efehansahin2172
      @efehansahin2172 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dj-fe4ck if I was on Holliday's somewhere. I wouldn't even bother about starches. I never tried durian. I would so love :)))

  • @mindfulmomentswithColm
    @mindfulmomentswithColm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Agreed

  • @polibm6510
    @polibm6510 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Look at our stomach pH (1.5). We are scavengers or at least carnivores...

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If that was the case, would we not see more baseline biological desire for raw flesh, blood and relish in the sight of dead animals. Not the case however, every single human without fail loves the look and taste of fruit. Even children

    • @polibm6510
      @polibm6510 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fruitkid4759 No. It's been millions of years since we discovered fire, so we've long been used to cooked meat. And as far as fruit is concerned - the sweet taste has two meanings: on the one hand, the certainty that the given food is not harmful (just as the bitter taste discourages consumption) and on the other hand, it is a sign that it is energetically important. However, in the past, fruit was only available for a limited time of the year, so the human body coped with the fructose in it. But too much glucose is harmful. Find TH-cam videos on this topic here...

    • @KK-lg8uz
      @KK-lg8uz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fruitkid4759 he just ruined your argument, you should acknowledge it. You're going to damage yourself long term if you keep eating like this. The fruit you eat doesnt even exist in nature, humans cultivated all of them. You're young enough to figure this out. Look up Dr. Andrew Chaffee his videos are excellent.

  • @dj-fe4ck
    @dj-fe4ck 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Humans are starchivores or starchitarians

    • @dj-fe4ck
      @dj-fe4ck 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/KWYRs30v7UE/w-d-xo.html

    • @codykizer4871
      @codykizer4871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      only following our migration away from our natural habitat which is that of the tropics near the equator. immediatly following fruits, starches in my opnion are a great runner up option however no where near as dialed in for optimal digestion and overall bodily performance as our natural born diet of fruits n leafy greens is for us. We are biologically and physiologically frugivores. there can be no denying this without its roots of denial being deep in the soil of cognitive dissonance.

  • @KK-lg8uz
    @KK-lg8uz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    we dont have to cook meat to eat it and we have 3.4 million years of evidence of meat eating. Those fruits you eat dont even exist in nature, humans cultivated all of them. They are also seasonal and in many parts of the world, during many periods of time in human evolution, fruits weren't even readily available. Animals always have been. We also have the digestive system of a carrion feeder/carnivore. Our gut pH is around pH1.5 and a frugivores is pH7. We have the same gut pH as a vulture. Nutritional anthropologists tell us that we were scavengers before we were hunters, which lines up with what physiologists know about our digestive system. Humans evolved as obligate carnivores. Anyone interested should watch the video by Barry Groves: Homo Carnivorus What We Are Designed to Eat

  • @omarrios5627
    @omarrios5627 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Makes sense

  • @alainroger-r8b
    @alainroger-r8b ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wrong. The first nations were eating RAW their meat. A long time ago.

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Would you be okay living on raw meat ?

    • @alainroger-r8b
      @alainroger-r8b ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fruitkid4759 not me, It takes time to do something like this. But I try different diets to see what is going on because the authorities lied to us, eons ago.

  • @r-e-s-o-n-a-n-t
    @r-e-s-o-n-a-n-t 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No.
    Humans and monkeys share many anatomical similarities due to their common evolutionary ancestry, but there are also significant differences, particularly in their digestive systems. Here's a comparison highlighting key differences:
    1. Digestive Tract Length
    Humans: The human digestive tract is relatively short compared to body size, reflecting an omnivorous diet that includes a significant amount of cooked food, which is easier to digest.
    Monkeys: The digestive tract of many monkey species is longer relative to their body size. This is especially true for leaf-eating monkeys (folivores) like colobus monkeys, which need a longer digestive tract to break down fibrous plant material.
    2. Stomach Structure
    Humans: Humans have a simple, single-chambered stomach designed for an omnivorous diet that includes both animal proteins and plants. Our stomachs produce acid to help break down food, particularly proteins.
    Monkeys: Some monkeys, like colobus monkeys, have a more complex stomach with multiple chambers, somewhat similar to a cow's stomach. This adaptation helps them ferment and digest tough plant material like leaves. Other monkeys, such as fruit-eating species, have simpler stomachs more similar to humans.
    3. Dietary Specialization
    Humans: Humans have a highly adaptable digestive system that can process a wide range of foods, including cooked and raw plants, meat, and processed foods. Our diet has evolved to include cooked food, which is easier to digest and allows for better nutrient absorption.
    Monkeys: Different monkey species have different dietary specializations. For example:
    Frugivores (fruit eaters): Monkeys like spider monkeys primarily eat fruit, and their digestive system is adapted to process high-sugar, high-water-content foods.
    Folivores (leaf eaters): Monkeys like colobus monkeys consume a lot of leaves, requiring specialized stomachs for fermenting and breaking down cellulose.
    Omnivores: Some monkeys, like baboons, have a more generalized diet similar to humans, consuming fruits, plants, insects, and small animals.
    4. Teeth and Jaw Structure
    Humans: Human teeth are designed for an omnivorous diet, with incisors for cutting, canines for tearing, and molars for grinding. The human jaw structure has evolved to accommodate a wide variety of foods, including cooked foods that require less chewing.
    Monkeys: Monkey teeth vary by species, reflecting their diet:
    Frugivores: Typically have large incisors and canines for piercing and biting into fruit.
    Folivores: Often have high-crowned molars with sharp ridges for grinding leaves.
    Omnivores: Have a more generalized set of teeth for processing a variety of foods, similar to humans but usually more robust for harder, uncooked items.
    5. Metabolic Rate
    Humans: Humans generally have a slower metabolic rate, which is partly due to our relatively longer lifespan and the ability to store fat for energy. This slower metabolism allows for more efficient energy use from a wide variety of foods.
    Monkeys: Many monkey species have a higher metabolic rate, especially those that are more active and have diets rich in fruits, which provide quick energy. This higher metabolic rate requires frequent feeding and efficient digestion of available food sources.
    6. Gut Microbiome
    Humans: The human gut microbiome is diverse and plays a crucial role in digestion, immune function, and overall health. It is shaped by a diet that includes a mix of animal and plant-based foods, often cooked or processed.
    Monkeys: The gut microbiome in monkeys varies significantly depending on their diet. Folivores have a microbiome adapted to breaking down cellulose and other complex carbohydrates, while frugivores have a microbiome suited to digesting sugars and fermenting plant materials.
    7. Nutrient Absorption
    Humans: Humans have adapted to absorb nutrients efficiently from a wide variety of foods, including those that are cooked, which can increase the bioavailability of certain nutrients.
    Monkeys: Depending on their diet, monkeys have adaptations to maximize nutrient absorption from their primary food sources. For example, leaf-eating monkeys have adaptations that allow them to extract nutrients from fibrous plant material that would be indigestible to humans.

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@r-e-s-o-n-a-n-t remove fire from the equation and no one would eat animals

  • @goriders100
    @goriders100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is no such thing as a “species specific food” so your whole claim falls apart immediately. Humans are verifiably observably omnivores. Now in modern times we can perform scientific dietary trials and we may determine that the best diet to minimize modern disease and extend life is a plant based diet. But that in no way contradicts the easily observed fact that humans are omnivorous, and have been for millions of years.

    • @fruitkid4759
      @fruitkid4759  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Humans are frugivorous creatures - Whether you believe we are omnivores- we would still be frugivorous. I think you’re basing your point on what we can put in our mouths, but if we only ate meat, it would shorten our lives dramatically. So it’s not that simple. My argument for why I don’t agree with the omnivore statement or at least not obligated is due to the fact amongst primates - you have species that don’t eat animals. based on human observations, most people dont enjoy seeing the process of animals being slaughtered, nor relish in the idea of eating bugs and insects, nor want to consume raw animal flesh whole after the kill. It is also the cause of chronic health issues in excess. So far, there is only positive attraction and outcomes to fruits, berries, tender greens, vegetables and all of science points towards a plant based diet, which is similar to how 95+% of our closest relatives eat. while my moral ethics points towards honouring our empathy and not taking the life of animals no different to us, who also has the right to life