Both India and China have their individual strengths of how to develop, grow and prosper. In comparison, the Chinese system of government is holistic, super efficient, very organized, competent and focus. Its leaders are dedicated, very well educated, trained, and experienced in governing a huge pro-business, hard-working, fast learning and innovative population! Hence the leaders can work and plan with the people to effectively implement and execute national plan targets every 5 years in short terms, mid-terms 25 years, and in long terms of 50 to 100 years! However the unique and effective Chinese ways of governance cannot be exported to or copied by any other Governments the world over! 😊
Siew Koń Sum : If the Chinese system of government were so super efficient, why tens of millions of Chinese people were starved to death in the 1960s; and later on, tens of thousands of babies were given to other countries.
@@garylin2732 : If China were really successful, why China needed to use the American language and use the American currency? China should strictly use only the Chinese language and Chinese currency. Why you are using the American language? Did you ever feel your ability to use the American language is equal to your success? In China, anybody using the American language will be paid a higher salary. Of course higher salary is equal to success.
@@legpol It was that attitude which led to the century of humiliation in China. The Chinese have learned from that mistake. Use the tools available to you to maximum effect and that will lead to the most successful outcome.
We are all different with different skills, don't blindly follow others, but we can learn from others and apply the success principles to suit our own needs.
Susan: yes, we can learn from others. To do so, we must first learn their language, which is largely the English language because English is the language in which all the sciences and technologies were written.
but the Dragon is the biggest ingrate in history because the Dragon had been saved by the Eagle many times from death and now the Dragon wanted to eat his saviour the Eagle.
India can grow fast but not faster than China did before 2008, like China GDP growth hit 14% in 2007, 1.Even West wanted to support India against China but West purchasing power shrunk so much after 2008 wallstreet crisis, also West wants to keep industry in homeland, 2.India economy is still very socialist, nationalistic, Indian government not only target Chinese investment even Western company, 3.China would move low-end industry to ASEAN so India is not only one, it means India would need to compete with ASEAN in future but ASEAN is in RCEP, 4.India democracy is chaotic, slow, unefficient, Indian politicians are too lazy and corrupt, too slow too improve infrastructure.
"India can grow fast but not faster than China did before 2008, like China GDP growth hit 14% in 2007," - I agree with this. But also India doesn't need to, especially since India is following a natural population curve. And everything else you said is mostly true but vastly irrelevant for India's growth story.
@@lvjinbin28 Both. India can't but it suits India cause it doesn't need to. India's growth and (eventual) slow down curves will look very different from that of China.
Grouchy Patch : Your "action action action" must be referring to the westernization movement launched by the Chinese. Without the westernization movement, China could not have grown so rich and strong.
@@xya6530 ：That was correct, modernization doesn’t equal to westernization. China has had both. China was both modernized and westernized by the West at the same time.
China will still be far headed from India U don't compare strong 💪 China to bitching India. keep praising ur master and attack China we'll see in 10 year
@@charlizet4314 He also made some other comments which incentivized me to write that comment. But I cannot see those comments now. Anyways, his comment of Indian alliance with the west will make the gap wider, is factually incorrect. Remember, China started to grow rich only when it started to open itself up to the western markets. India is trying to do the same. I understand Chinese hostility towards India which is apparent in this comment section. Even Kishore is only admired when he praises China. The moment he talks anything good about America or India the comments become "dirty Endian ............" by Chinese commentators. It is what it is. India might be poor now. But India is definitely not stupid. The attitude toward India by Chinese is equal to the attitude towards Chinese by Americans.
Both India and China have their individual strengths of how to develop, grow and prosper.
In comparison, the Chinese system of government is holistic, super efficient, very organized, competent and focus.
Its leaders are dedicated, very well educated, trained, and experienced in governing a huge pro-business, hard-working, fast learning and innovative population!
Hence the leaders can work and plan with the people to effectively implement and execute national plan targets every 5 years in short terms, mid-terms 25 years, and in long terms of 50 to 100 years!
However the unique and effective Chinese ways of governance cannot be exported to or copied by any other Governments the world over! 😊
Well said! 100% agree with you! That’s why China is so successful .
Chinese characteristic system for the Chinese i suppose
Siew Koń Sum : If the Chinese system of government were so super efficient, why tens of millions of Chinese people were starved to death in the 1960s; and later on, tens of thousands of babies were given to other countries.
@@garylin2732 : If China were really successful, why China needed to use the American language and use the American currency? China should strictly use only the Chinese language and Chinese currency. Why you are using the American language? Did you ever feel your ability to use the American language is equal to your success? In China, anybody using the American language will be paid a higher salary. Of course higher salary is equal to success.
@@legpol It was that attitude which led to the century of humiliation in China. The Chinese have learned from that mistake. Use the tools available to you to maximum effect and that will lead to the most successful outcome.
We are all different with different skills, don't blindly follow others, but we can learn from others and apply the success principles to suit our own needs.
Susan: yes, we can learn from others. To do so, we must first learn their language, which is largely the English language because English is the language in which all the sciences and technologies were written.
A. Varshney, the "Indian expert", would have had a heart burn listening to that.
Once again, spot on, Prof!
Dragon has been dancing with d Elephant for millenia. The young Eagle can’t sit still…
but the Dragon is the biggest ingrate in history because the Dragon had been saved by the Eagle many times from death and now the Dragon wanted to eat his saviour the Eagle.
India can grow fast but not faster than China did before 2008, like China GDP growth hit 14% in 2007,
1.Even West wanted to support India against China but West purchasing power shrunk so much after 2008 wallstreet crisis, also West wants to keep industry in homeland,
2.India economy is still very socialist, nationalistic, Indian government not only target Chinese investment even Western company,
3.China would move low-end industry to ASEAN so India is not only one, it means India would need to compete with ASEAN in future but ASEAN is in RCEP,
4.India democracy is chaotic, slow, unefficient, Indian politicians are too lazy and corrupt, too slow too improve infrastructure.
This is the reality. Sure, India will grow at a faster pace but India's GDP is coming from a much lower base
"India can grow fast but not faster than China did before 2008, like China GDP growth hit 14% in 2007," - I agree with this. But also India doesn't need to, especially since India is following a natural population curve.
And everything else you said is mostly true but vastly irrelevant for India's growth story.
@@arunsar7893 India doesn't need to? or India can't?
@@lvjinbin28 Both. India can't but it suits India cause it doesn't need to. India's growth and (eventual) slow down curves will look very different from that of China.
@@arunsar7893 why India doesn't need to? where's your logic?
Talk talk talk >>>india
Action action action >> China.
Grouchy Patch : Your "action action action" must be referring to the westernization movement launched by the Chinese. Without the westernization movement, China could not have grown so rich and strong.
@@legpol Modernization doesn’t equal westernization.
@@xya6530 ：That was correct, modernization doesn’t equal to westernization. China has had both. China was both modernized and westernized by the West at the same time.
Looks like grouchy patch here has been thrashed by Indians many times over…poor guy..😂😂😂
China. Russia 👍
🐂🐃🐘🇮🇳 ✌️ U. S. and U. K. 🇺🇲
How does it feel to bully a poorer country? You must be feeling superior, right mate?
Don't put india & China together in the same sentence , there are not the same . india growing economy , come back in ten years & we'll see.
China will still be far headed from India
U don't compare strong 💪 China to bitching India.
keep praising ur master and attack China we'll see in 10 year
Ya, the economic gap will become wider in 10 yrs if India aligns itself with the west
@@teckchuonting4582 How does it feel to bully a poorer country? You must be feeling superior, right mate?
@@arnabdas7019 he is not saying that because he feel superior. read the full sentence.
@@charlizet4314 He also made some other comments which incentivized me to write that comment. But I cannot see those comments now.
Anyways, his comment of Indian alliance with the west will make the gap wider, is factually incorrect. Remember, China started to grow rich only when it started to open itself up to the western markets. India is trying to do the same.
I understand Chinese hostility towards India which is apparent in this comment section. Even Kishore is only admired when he praises China. The moment he talks anything good about America or India the comments become "dirty Endian ............" by Chinese commentators.
It is what it is. India might be poor now. But India is definitely not stupid. The attitude toward India by Chinese is equal to the attitude towards Chinese by Americans.