All these critics against China seemed to be experts who have lived in China for years to be able to conclude their views. My question is, have they live in China to make them experts?
The reason these people who criticize China is because of the rise of China and did it in its own way that is much different from the so-called "standard system". China would rather have the party control of the capital market to ensure better distribution of wealth especially to those lower class citizens than allowing the capital market to develop wildly into a system that only benefits those top 1% of the citizens as in most cases of the Western capital markets.
perhaps the one asking the question should write his question down, and ask himself, can he ask a question, in 1 sentence, and not asking a question, over 4 mins. and he is not audible.
@@tnluvais2699 Kishore says the top 1% of academic achievers end up in the communist party. According to him 5% of the populace are party members. However the politburo has only 25 members. These members replicate themselves. When one retired he nominates his colleague to take his place. Off course the nominee will sail through the party process. So finally loyalty to your politburo member far outweighs any meritocracy. Kishore is surrounded by Singapore Chinese who also practice 'meritrocracy' but actually practice loyalty to the Lee family dynasty.
@@ckokloong Singapore definitely will be doing fantastic in the next 10 years. Things will change when China invades Taiwan. If Singapore is smart it should condemn such invasion and have a 100% pro US policy. Kishore is for 50:50 playing one against the other. If the PM follows Kishore then Singapore will be a disaster
"Established scholars on China" could mean experts or, more likely than not, especially in the West, someone who understand a few Chinese characters and read a few books about China.
The panel does not know the fundamental of China is that the ancient Chinese scholars and public learned and acquired the fundamental from ancient wise ancestor who discovered the fundamental nature of humanity. It has been carried out several thousands of years and will be in future as it is beyond time and civilisation era. However, this fundamental may not necessary fully understood by all Chinese, probably majority abit here and there, but the effect taken albeit not full blossom, has been so enormous 😅😅😅
But the ancient civilisation are based on repressive societies , the modern civilisation is freedom and democratic . Many countries are in their transition from ancient civilisation to modern civilisation.
Mao burned ancient Chinese philosophers books and even statues. That's what the CCP think about ancient wisdom. Their school children are taught the wisdom of karl marx and Engels. Also their heroes are Lenin and Stalin. They don't know anything much about Confuses or Lao Tzi etc.
@@everythingandmore5537 sorry even mao cannot Change Chinese All Chinese are natural born capitalist Our religious are money Nobody in China care ideology anymore That is the secret of success of China
There is state capital and booming capitalist economy in China, instead of state capitalism. Capitalism means complete free market and privatization while Chinese government owns most resources and government oriented and directed market.
Why did the host not intervene the questioner who was clearly rambling but one Chinese questioner was rudely asked “What is your question”. Seems racist to me.
![รวมเพลงลูกทุ่ง 6 หนุ่มไทบ้าน ฮิตติดกระแส ชุดที่ 1 l มนต์แคน ไมค์ ไผ่ เสถียร ไหมไทย พี [Longplay]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GD2v1OjMw5I/mqdefault.jpg)
l find Prof Mabhubani's views unbiased and data based on China.
those never lived in China but pretend like China Expert, what gives them so much confidence?
All these critics against China seemed to be experts who have lived in China for years to be able to conclude their views.
My question is, have they live in China to make them experts?
This guy takes 4 minutes to ask a question
Head bobbing n head bobbing n head bobbing….n blah blah blah….
I lost track of the questioner's question after a minute as he rattles on and on. Is he making a statement?
😂😂
brilliant answer.
Many theocratic authors have not even run a small company.
and not visited China or visited China like decades ago and thinking it remain the same.
ya they are delusional scholars
Do not talk to any anti-China media or activist who never admits their wrong judgements and always find another excuse to cover their mistakes.
the question sounds from a place far away, the toilet
The reason these people who criticize China is because of the rise of China and did it in its own way that is much different from the so-called "standard system". China would rather have the party control of the capital market to ensure better distribution of wealth especially to those lower class citizens than allowing the capital market to develop wildly into a system that only benefits those top 1% of the citizens as in most cases of the Western capital markets.
perhaps the one asking the question should write his question down, and ask himself, can he ask a question, in 1 sentence, and not asking a question, over 4 mins. and he is not audible.
Indians are poor in many things, but not in words.
I was thinking the same 😂
@@tnluvais2699 Kishore says the top 1% of academic achievers end up in the communist party. According to him 5% of the populace are party members. However the politburo has only 25 members. These members replicate themselves. When one retired he nominates his colleague to take his place. Off course the nominee will sail through the party process. So finally loyalty to your politburo member far outweighs any meritocracy. Kishore is surrounded by Singapore Chinese who also practice 'meritrocracy' but actually practice loyalty to the Lee family dynasty.
@@everythingandmore5537 Probably Kishore will bet $1000 with you Singapore still doing fantastic for the next 10 years.
@@ckokloong Singapore definitely will be doing fantastic in the next 10 years. Things will change when China invades Taiwan. If Singapore is smart it should condemn such invasion and have a 100% pro US policy. Kishore is for 50:50 playing one against the other. If the PM follows Kishore then Singapore will be a disaster
"Established scholars on China" could mean experts or, more likely than not, especially in the West, someone who understand a few Chinese characters and read a few books about China.
The panel does not know the fundamental of China is that the ancient Chinese scholars and public learned and acquired the fundamental from ancient wise ancestor who discovered the fundamental nature of humanity. It has been carried out several thousands of years and will be in future as it is beyond time and civilisation era. However, this fundamental may not necessary fully understood by all Chinese, probably majority abit here and there, but the effect taken albeit not full blossom, has been so enormous 😅😅😅
But the ancient civilisation are based on repressive societies , the modern civilisation is freedom and democratic . Many countries are in their transition from ancient civilisation to modern civilisation.
Mao burned ancient Chinese philosophers books and even statues. That's what the CCP think about ancient wisdom. Their school children are taught the wisdom of karl marx and Engels. Also their heroes are Lenin and Stalin. They don't know anything much about Confuses or Lao Tzi etc.
@@everythingandmore5537 sorry even mao cannot Change Chinese
All Chinese are natural born capitalist
Our religious are money
Nobody in China care ideology anymore
That is the secret of success of China
There is state capital and booming capitalist economy in China, instead of state capitalism. Capitalism means complete free market and privatization while Chinese government owns most resources and government oriented and directed market.
the CPC not stupid
A stupid CPC is a real threat to America!
ya because the qualifications r very high
A questioner wasting 3min 54 sec of the precious time should not be on Utube.
👍👍👍🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳👏👏👏
👏👏👏🇧🇷🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇿🇦👍👍👍
Why did the host not intervene the questioner who was clearly rambling but one Chinese questioner was rudely asked “What is your question”. Seems racist to me.
Long winded questioner. Came out from the toilet he is still talking.
like lecturing him