What You Need To Know: Are ACC Bylaws In The Eyes of The Beholder | FSU v ACC battle in FL & NC 🏛️

To Vote or Not To Vote (until later) That Is The Question: 2 Judges, FSU, & ACC bylaws walk into a courtroom.... and come out with very different opinions on the rules around the ACC moving forward with suing a member institution.
Fresh off the marathon hearing in Leon County on April 9th, 2024, Jen Santi from ‪@TheRenegadeReport‬ has questions and so do we as we launch our newest show "The Consiglieres" where experts weigh in with answers to the questions we all have around the everchanging world of CFB and conference realignment (and a few opinions thrown in here or there).
Attorney and #fsu alum Doug Rohan takes off the Garnett and Gold glasses to try to help us all sort out how two judges can call balls and strikes very differently in the ongoing world of dueling lawsuits in Leon County, FL and Mecklenburg County, NC
Follow CFB Mafia and our guests on Twitter | X :
Jen: @jensanti1890
Doug: @RohanLawPC
Vince: @VCnole
Nate: @bombe3r
@TheCFBmafia
@B12Mafia
Want to learn more? Don't forget to check out the full live-stream breakdown from our new experts show "The Consiglieres" including Jen Santi from @TheRenegadeReport and VCnole from @garnetandold here • The Consiglieres: With...
Get Involved! Join our Discord server today! Help us grow our Mafioso Family!
/ discord

[@user-ot2in8kc1l]

I understand Doug’s replay analogy and agree with his reasoning. But, you responded to Jen’s question about the vote without answering it. The question was how can the judge(s) show favoring to the ACC on taking a vote, to amend the vote that was ever taken, without proof? In both court cases the judges in confirmed in their comments and questions during the hearing (both NC and FL) that physical proof was never provided to the court. In fact, judge Cooper had the ACC attorney confirm that it was not provided to the court. In addition, the FSU attorney claimed that they were being denied the minutes to the ACC meetings which held the vote.
To summarize: what legally gives the judge authorization to make a ruling on opinion (hearsay), rather than fact basis (documentation)? No factual proof has been supplied to the court that the vote has even been taken? To initiate or radify. Only assumption based on what the ACC attorney has told the court.

[@CaryGoNoles]

Yo