777X APPROVAL? - The Future Of Boeing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.ย. 2024
  • In 2024, Boeing will continue pushing for certification of its 777X and send a 777-9 to Emirates for testing. The plane maker will also chase certification for its remaining two variants of the 737 MAX series, the 737-7 and 737-10. Additionally, Boeing will look towards improving its supply chain and deliver and produce planes on time.
    🔔 Subscribe to GlobeTrotting: bit.ly/Subscri...
    🖥️ Visit the website: djsaviation.net
    CONNECT WITH GLOBETROTTING
    🐦 Twitter: / djsaviation
    👥 Facebook: / djsaviation
    💬 Discord: / discord
    💻 Patreon: / djsaviation
    BUSINESS ENQUIRIES
    📧 Email: contactdjsaviation@gmail.com
    CHECK OUT THE PODCAST
    🎙️ Spotify: bit.ly/DjsAvia...
    🎙️ Apple: bit.ly/DjsPodc...
    SUBMIT VIDEO IDEAS
    ✍️ Form - bit.ly/SubmitV...
    ℹ️ MORE INFORMATION ℹ️
    creativecommon...
    Licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.0
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    🎵 OUTRO TRACK 🎵
    Krys Talk - Fly Away [NCS Release]
    Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
    • Krys Talk - Fly Away |...
    Free Download / Stream ncs.io/flyaway
    #aviation #news #flight #aircraft #avgeek #airplane #airlines #airport #planespotting #airbus #boeing

ความคิดเห็น • 97

  • @jl-7992
    @jl-7992 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    I think after the 737 fiasco, any doubts concerning the safety of any sysytem on the 777x will not be rushed or overlooked

    • @neilsunn
      @neilsunn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Understood. 5 years of delay? The L-1011 took 4 years clean sheet to a wide body.

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Boeing will postpone 777X but push 737-10 through the FAA throat

    • @nickolliver3021
      @nickolliver3021 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@henson2k they cant because the 777x is on track for 25 EIS

    • @davidoldham1946
      @davidoldham1946 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure pilot training needs to be intensified especially in the third world.

    • @jjjddd231
      @jjjddd231 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But this is Boeing.

  • @ma96782
    @ma96782 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hey can we get someone to tighten those rudder and plug door bolts?
    "What bolts?" "Das not my Yob."

  • @frankiexv4533
    @frankiexv4533 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The -7 will likely see production this summer and the -10 will probably be certified by years end. 2025 will likely see production of both the 777x and the 737-10. The 787-9 and -10 will also probably get the HGW updates as well.

    • @reubenmorris487
      @reubenmorris487 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't forget; the upcoming rumor of the Labor strike will slow things down every so slightly.

  • @darkninja4580
    @darkninja4580 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ya you upload as much as u can and we appreciate it keep it up😁😁😁😁

  • @tgraham719
    @tgraham719 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Gosh I love that plane .. hope one day I have to go somewhere it flys. Wish I could fly it from Santa Ana to Portland each time.

    • @michaelandmariedownes6070
      @michaelandmariedownes6070 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Problem is it will be an uncomfortablex10 wide seating plan me thinks. No matter how good Boeing makes the inside of the aircraft look great in mockups, the airlines will do all they can to reverse customer comfort by stuffing more ppl into the tube as is physically possible 😬

  • @nitdev-ms
    @nitdev-ms 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Hi DJ. I know this was just uploaded 3 minutes ago. I just wanted to praise you for your constant effort in producing the best of the best of aviation content for us. I have been following every single one of your videos and I am ALWAYS just looking for new videos from you. I just want you to know that I am very thankful for the content you upload. Thank you so much!

  • @ADPeguero
    @ADPeguero 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Whatever they do, I hope they don't rush it. It would kill Boeing if they rush through anymore certifications after the 737 Max fiasco of a few years ago.

  • @liil_sleepy
    @liil_sleepy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Looks like 2024 is gonna be a great and controversy free year for Boeing!!!!!!!

    • @portcybertryx222
      @portcybertryx222 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      F😂lol

    • @luiskp7173
      @luiskp7173 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This didn’t age well.

    • @jayvee8502
      @jayvee8502 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not really.

  • @sainnt
    @sainnt 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Boeing is in the process of getting an order of 150 Max aircraft from Indian carrier Akasa.

  • @charlestoast4051
    @charlestoast4051 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A380 sales suffered greatly as a result of delays in that program, so I expect the same will apply to the 777X.

    • @Perich29
      @Perich29 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The A380 is a Boomdoggle.

  • @davidkembo7484
    @davidkembo7484 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Happy new year Dj

  • @billy98102
    @billy98102 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It is a beautiful airplane!

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I think Boeing wants the 737-7 and 737-10 certified soon. Reason: a large number of 737-10's already on order and a potential 300 plane order for the 737-7 from Southwest Airlines.

  • @user-yc2oz8kc5k
    @user-yc2oz8kc5k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "If they certify the 777x, the airlines will order it."

    • @5amsunspor
      @5amsunspor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Certification and ordering the type is not the issue, its safety concerns and confidence for both boeing and the airlines . They had certified the Max 8 ?

  • @neilsunn
    @neilsunn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My goal for Boeing 2024: Manufacturing the highest quality airliners passengers will take note of.

    • @drjojo4624
      @drjojo4624 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Boeing’s goal for Boeing: return as much money to shareholders and make as few changes as possible and spend as little money as possible to make their aircraft that are not currently certifiable as safe actually meet FAA requirements - and screw what passengers think.
      (Or, alternatively, add a few cheap gimmicks to make passengers think that the aircraft are wonderful, while distracting them and the FAA from fundamental flaws in their products)

  • @Michael-et2ed
    @Michael-et2ed 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How could this Desaster Happen to Boeing ? Deadly mistakes in production can ruin the company!

  • @juniorlmxpvaairlines
    @juniorlmxpvaairlines 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    About Boeing 737, sicerely I not understand the certification process of Boeing 737-7 and Boeing 737-10.
    Why I not understand?
    Because the Airbus A220-300 who is more profitable who A319neo and A321neo for 3500nm, the 737 is rival of A321-200, certified in 1997.

  • @henson2k
    @henson2k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I flew on D-ABPA in December 2022(shown in the beginning of the video)

  • @Jermigggricoooo
    @Jermigggricoooo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    777-9 certification

  • @stevendurick9441
    @stevendurick9441 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'd love to see the MAX 10 get certified. Even though the MAX 7 is likely to get done first, it's based on an aircraft that is already flying (the 737-700NG). Whilst the MAX 10 is not a clean sheet, it is a new stretched version of the 737 and I'd love to see how airlines that operate it are going to configure it. On top of that, it's important for Boeing, because unless you're looking at the 787-8, the MAX 10 is the closest Boeing is gonna get to the Middle-of-Market for some time.

  • @wadehiggins1114
    @wadehiggins1114 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The word smooth and boeing cannot be used in the same sentence.

  • @dcsyd16
    @dcsyd16 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mach 2 Sonic Cruiser with a military version would be cool

  • @IamNiggler
    @IamNiggler 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Boeing for the boys

  • @juniorlmxpvaairlines
    @juniorlmxpvaairlines 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why not increase range on Boeing 787-10?
    Imagine a Boeing 787-10LR for 7500 or 8000 nm!!!
    Is possible and is a good update for unpopular Boeing 787-10.
    Is my opinion!!!

  • @Perich29
    @Perich29 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Alaska airline 737 Max 9 had a door frame broke off in mid air and head to make an emergency landing.

  • @747forever9
    @747forever9 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ty dj!!

  • @christainmarks106
    @christainmarks106 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think Boeing is going to have something this year that they haven’t had in a couple years. And that is a Kick ass year. I wouldn’t be surprised if the 777-X is approved in Q4 of 2024 rather than early 2025 as expected

  • @audacity60
    @audacity60 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A re-engined Boeing 767-200ER (Max), would be a decent middle market aircraft, available quickly, at reasonable cost.

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No it would not.

    • @bobdevreeze4741
      @bobdevreeze4741 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why not the 787. They had a -3 for the mid market and they scrapped it. 767 along with the 757 would need a total redesign to meet modern safety requirements and you still wind up with a decades old aircraft that suites no one . 757 is done. All the jigs used to make it were scrapped years ago. The 767 will carry on as a freighter until the 777F and A350f get to the market at the end of the decade.

    • @audacity60
      @audacity60 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Boeing says the 787-3 would cost near enough the same as a 787-8, so airlines would rather have the extra capability of the -8. The 767-200 is still in production for the USAF tanker. Create a 767 Max2 & it would be a middle market airliner + a more efficient USAF Tanker.@@bobdevreeze4741

  • @michaelandmariedownes6070
    @michaelandmariedownes6070 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With the latest example of poor Boeing quality control of the 737, You have to ask yourself how did the FAA sign off on this latest fiasco. Boeing HAS to start work on a 737 replacement for heavens sake.

  • @pesawatindonesia
    @pesawatindonesia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wow

  • @dennissalisbury496
    @dennissalisbury496 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Airliner Safety Record is a truly remarkable Industrial Science: Global air traffic - number of flights 2004-2023
    The number of flights performed globally by the airline industry has increased steadily since the early 2000s and reached 38.9 million in 2019. However, due to the coronavirus pandemic, the number of flights dropped to 16.9 million in 2020. Nov 2, 2023 Airline industry worldwide - number of flights 2023 - Statista

  • @bobboberson2024
    @bobboberson2024 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Boeing doesn't have to navigate thwe market; they created the market!

  • @stephenbarringtonleigh367
    @stephenbarringtonleigh367 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:40 Hold on a second DJ....Didn't Dave Calhoun say a year or two ago that a clean sheet design was a decade away? He clarified that Boeing needs to focus on the 737 MAX, 787 and 77 7X families.
    I would love to finally see the 777X be certified. That's a pretty cool plane and would help Boeing compete against the A330neo. Frankly, given the 737 MAX's MCAS issues, I am not overly interested in seeing the -7 or -10 certified. The family has made Boeing lose most of its ligitimacy and now we're in another massive problem regarding the familiy. Ugh. Come on Boeing. What's going on with your QC department? How could loose bolts get past you? If you insert a bolt, doesn't it follow logically that you SCREW IT IN????? Alright, that Spirit SCREWS IT IN????

    • @Infiltator2
      @Infiltator2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean they don't have any ressources as of now. They still have massive issues with the 737Max and the 777x, which are also impacting there. Boeing is losing money they also can't afford a new design. Just since 220 Boeing has lost 11.5 billion USD if you include Q4 in 2020 you are at 20 billion net loss. That is also what is needed for a clean sheet design.

  • @tanierliperez-barquero5313
    @tanierliperez-barquero5313 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Boeing deberá de mejorar la calidad con los aviones

  • @torccchaser6712
    @torccchaser6712 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Happy New Year DJ...............................GO BOEING GO K

  • @sleepyg2011
    @sleepyg2011 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A radically improved 787X high gross weight and much improved longer range across-the-board

  • @lachlanbirrell4718
    @lachlanbirrell4718 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you know if Boeing has any future plans for the 767?

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They do not. That's old gen

    • @Tpr_1808
      @Tpr_1808 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@johniii8147They've got freighters still in production and have to finish the backlog soon enough or face being unable to deliver them because of regulations

    • @user-yc2oz8kc5k
      @user-yc2oz8kc5k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      767 production will end on 2028. : (

    • @fensterlips
      @fensterlips 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With nothing to replace it. Perfect.

    • @user-yc2oz8kc5k
      @user-yc2oz8kc5k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fensterlips the 787 was built originally with that purpose.

  • @jacquesdemolay2699
    @jacquesdemolay2699 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why do you show one plane but talk about another ?
    this may confuse those who are not familiar enough to tell them apart.

    • @rscott2247
      @rscott2247 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He probably does it to keep us from getting bored with his chatter.

  • @davidoldham1946
    @davidoldham1946 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sounds like a lot of these airliners bellyaching should be directed at the bureaucratic chuckleheads that are too scared to make a decision....no can't do that, they can't be shaken down for refunds and the like. It also is a bit ridiculous that the 737 variants take so long regardless of the recent past, we are not talking about aircraft significantly different from the other two variants, the length being the most obvious.

  • @ronparrish6666
    @ronparrish6666 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Blame the 737 problems on Southwest the plane was designed around them

    • @fensterlips
      @fensterlips 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Boeing could have insisted in two AOA sensors on all their planes. A review of foreign airlines training wouldn’t hurt either. The planes had most of the responsibility but the MCAS failure could have been controlled.

  • @Mercy_Pants
    @Mercy_Pants 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still not certified

  • @Luke_Go
    @Luke_Go 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The biggest long-term 777X problem is an A350neo a few years after 777X's first delivery

  • @DennisMerwood-xk8wp
    @DennisMerwood-xk8wp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why were the ONLY two 737MAX crashes with third-world Airlines?
    Flying an airplane that up until the time of the crashes had experienced ZERO incidents.

    After a year of test flights and data-gathering, the MAX gained certification from the FAA in March 2017, followed by other global regulators later that month.
    By May 2018, a year after the first delivery, more than 130-MAX's were in service with 28-different airlines around the world and had flown almost 42,000 flights.
    With ZERO incidents
    Before the second crash, there were nearly 50-carriers that were operating the MAX. Using it for an estimated 8,600 flights per week.
    With no ZERO incidents.
    That the FAA and EASA didn't know about MCAS, a meme being pushed by BOEING BASHERS and the MSM, is bovine excrement.
    Although Boeing did not call MCAS out by that name, the Boeing Flight Crew Operation Manual (FCOM) described the function in detail, and how to override it.
    And 50-carriers crews had no problems with understanding it.
    The FCOM was successfully used by 50-carriers to train crews in flying the new 737 variant.
    Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines with their low-time inexperienced pilots and with inadequate management of their crew training - ruined the safety record of a perfectly safe airplane.
    The fuselage plug issue occurred in ONE airplane, out of 1,420 delivered and after flying over 100,000 incident free flights!
    The plane and crew handled the incident perfectly. Nobody was hurt. Not even a sticking plaster was needed in this "disaster"!
    Boeing and Spirit will take remedial action - and the 737MAX will go on to be as safe as any other commercial aircraft currently flying.
    Boeing has 4,031 MAX aircraft in its order backlog.
    You think these folks who fly these wonderful airplanes every day for a living think the MAX is dangerous? Yeah right!
    Crossing the street, or driving one's car to get groceries, is 1,000 times more likely to get you killed than flying in a Boeing 737MAX.
    This is just an over-the-top, hysterical, hyperbolic nonsense coming from woke folk who want to live a life of 100% safety!
    Better stay at home and sit on their couch!
    And the magnificent 777X is going to take the place of the magnificent "Queen of the Sky's", the 747.

    • @Infiltator2
      @Infiltator2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So Alaska Airlines is also a third wolrd airline?

    • @jgnclvgmng5408
      @jgnclvgmng5408 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What a load of crap. A delusional robot?
      The MAX was certified by Boeing, not by the FAA which just signed the papers. They lied with everything they wanted. Including the existence of MCAS. As to being detailed in the flight manual, of course, anyone will figure out an obscure feature disguised to have the plane certified with the same certification rating as the old planes. That in 1 or 2 minutes. With MCAS giving erroneous commands. Piece of cake.
      It's disgusting and below any decency to blame the crashes on Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines. The people on those planes would surely have traded places with you or your family.
      The plug door issue is another proof of Boeing UTTER's incompetence and disregard for anything that isn't making money.
      It will be so laughable if Boeing makes a mess with the 777X too, which frankly is more likely than the opposite.
      As to the bovine excrement, just read what you wrote. Fits like a glove.

  • @Peizxcv
    @Peizxcv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Boeing is just loud with thin insulation to save weight

  • @davidrumbelow
    @davidrumbelow 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about St Helena, South Atlantic. Get away from cold wet England

  • @martinklanecky7281
    @martinklanecky7281 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ?

  • @jjjddd231
    @jjjddd231 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My hope is that Qantas and Virgin Australia decide not to do any future business with Boeing. A completely untrustworthy company sadly.

  • @p38cobra
    @p38cobra 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    777x not real will never get adoption

    • @waynerooo
      @waynerooo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's funny.

    • @p38cobra
      @p38cobra 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@waynerooo I’m actually hoping for opposite; big Boeing Douglas Lockheed fanboy and being a Pessimist predicting negative will turn out better

  • @MichaelKing4023
    @MichaelKing4023 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It should never get a FAA approval it made by Boeing and it not an and never will be a safe aircraft.

  • @jayvee8502
    @jayvee8502 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope 777x will fail. BOEING needs to pay for their crimes.

  • @QuietStormX
    @QuietStormX 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Boeing losing Sales waiting on the FAA. The Agency will have to pay for losses and sales with U.S. Government with support for losses $$$$$$$$$$$$$ to cover the waits... ;-(

  • @lsubesteva
    @lsubesteva 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like Boeing and I respect the mark they’ve made in the industry. But since they merged with McDonald Douglas they just became incredibly lazy!! Just keep remaking the 737 is disgusting!!! The 777X is the answer to the A350. But they do nothing to change the look? Incredibly lazy

  • @norm5392
    @norm5392 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Boeing should just give up. Completely inferior product to Airbus.

    • @Planetrainguy
      @Planetrainguy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The 777X is literally better than any airbus product at the moment closest being A350

    • @norm5392
      @norm5392 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Planetrainguy No chance. The 777x is an overweight tank

    • @Planetrainguy
      @Planetrainguy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@norm5392 that’s why it has 450 orders

    • @portcybertryx222
      @portcybertryx222 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 777x punches way above the a350 and they compete in very different sectors. Stop comparing them. It’s pointless

    • @norm5392
      @norm5392 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Planetrainguy wait until it’s in service and doesn’t perform as specified