Supreme Court New 6-3 Decision Backs Suppressor Freedom Law Removing NFA Restrictions!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2024
- In this video I break down how a recent Supreme Court decision can help the current efforts to remove NFA and ATF restrictions on suppressors!
🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥
Instagram: / armedscholaryt
Twitter: / armedscholaryt
Twitch: / armedscholar
📷 My TH-cam Setup 📷
Camera: (Sony A7siii) amzn.to/36YIe96
Lens: (Tamron 17-28) amzn.to/3wSPn5H
Lighting: (GVM RGB) amzn.to/3zpDfdT
Microphone: (Rode Wireless) amzn.to/3iBgnkU
Camera Stand: (Broadcast Boom) amzn.to/2V7meWV
Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!
Support the channel by liking the video and subscribing!
Can we pretty please get some clarity on the brace situation? I’m honestly confused on what is happening with them.
Anthony im in Calif do you see being able to posses supresdors
At this point, even considering anything adjust has to say is worthless. Every judge on that panel is corrupt as the day is long. They were put in place by Biden and Obama. The American people are done with our corrupt justice system in depending on them to rule on the side of the law and the citizens. They twist the wall to fit their own needs. And they use their opinion to Force the scales of Justice to fit their desired outcome. The American people are done with that. The state of Texas is done with that. And every Republican controlled state is done with that. The Supreme Court will be disbanded. In every justice on that panel will be in prison or put to death. And they have no one to blame themselves for what’s coming next! Texas is making preparations to cut off all of their state borders. Which means that they’re going to not allow any other citizens from other states to enter the state of Texas without express permission like you were leaving the country. On top of that Texas has control of one of the largest ports of entry in the United States of America.. the federal government will have to pay a sanction to use that port of entry. The United States government does not have authority over independent states. And that’s exactly what Texas became an independent state. And every Republican control state is going to follow suit. Which means none of these states will provide federal tax dollars to the government. All their money that is produced in their state by their economy will stay there. The federal government will be defunded. And then the ones that tried to force their hand and try to make Texas comply will be slaughtered, right where they stand and their families!
We all appreciate your videos a ton. But can you make them shorter and simple? Like if English wasn’t my first language. Thanks again keep it up
If silencers are not firearms, they're accessories, then the ATF shouldn't be able to moderate them in any way. Someone needs to silence the ATF.
The atf shouldn't exist
They shouldn’t be able to moderate anything to move the goal posts period. Maybe if they were actually a credible agency that actually stopped terror maybe people wouldn’t hate them so much.
The ATF cannot regulate shit without a properly passed piece of legislation. Even then it would be illegal, just as illegal as the mere existence of the ATF. There is NO allowance in the US Constitution for such an illegal organization and without that permission it is by default an illegal arm of the government.
you don't have to listen to the ATF if SCOTUS says you don't. if you're still scared might as well turn in all of your guns.
The only problem with that is we claim accessories as firearms under the second amendment, at least as far as parts, magazines and ammo, so that may be a little hippocriticle of us.
So we pay the ATF with our taxes to take our rights away.
Yep
Always has been
NOW you are getting it... just like other agencies...
Don't forget every other government branch too!
They’re not the only law-enforcement responsible for this
If a state can’t stand up for its citizens, who can?
Our commander and chief is head of our military supposed to protect America.
The EOs are illegal because the EOs do not protect our country.
The govt employees know the bigger their agency the bigger the promotion
The States Constitutional Militia.
The citizens.
Why in hell are we trying to parley with these tyrants?
What's the realistic option?
because unlike them we are civilized people
still there must be some point we wont let them cross no matter the cost
@@mac113802A???
@@mac11380 The same option Colorado and other weed friendly states use to sell marijuana..
We don't have the police with we the people. They are an outlaw department known as a standing army which is not allowed by our constitution. Only they can change that.
Suppressors are a health item,They are designed to protect hearing.No need to regulate them
Maxim, inventor of the machine gun, created suppressors expressly for the purpose of protecting hunters' hearing. The image of the "silencer" is a Hollywood fantasy.
Yep. It's sad when the UK has better laws about suppressors than we do.
Really, never heard of ear plugs.?
@@earth2006 Ah yes, jam some plugs in your dogs' ears when hunting.
Genius.
@muskratgg I don't abuse my animals, my dogs have enough issues. I don't hunt. For the matter, I've never heard of a hunter that used a silencer.
Defund the ATF!
strip the F from atf
Under Bruen, NFA, GCA68 and the Hughes Amendment should all be gone!!!
Exactly
@@jasonmaceyko1902 Yup, they are not traditional in our nations history. Felons were rearmed upon release from incarceration.
If Vivek was nominee he would get rid of all that stuff. he even said he'd repeal the NFA and dissolve the ATF/FBI. based dark skin indian.
Corrupt. Usefull but useless idiots. God takes care of them in his own time. Jesus taught many lessons, one being pray for your enemy. Get the connection!.
I'm not a Jesus freak. "They will hate you because of my name". Who are they !
Yep
If a suppressor is not an arm why is the Alcohol Tobacco and “Firearms” involved?
Because it's fraudulently included in a firearms list, alas.
In My Humble Opinion,
It is because the U.S government wants "their" $200 in Tax Money for each and every Suppressor(Silencer) that is made and sold in this country !! !!
This is just MY OPINION, and your opinion may be different !! !!
.
ATF was created from the Treasury to tax - hence the A and T. What else is taxable? The F's.
It’s because these rules are all politically motivated for the purpose of power and control.
I get so frustrated when people say "suppressors have nothing to do with home defense or self defense." tell me you've never been to an indoor gun range without telling me. especially if someone is there with a revolver. never fails to amaze me how loud guns are even with ear plugs. now imagine firing one of those in your hallway in your underwear with no ear plugs.
This whole process is guaranteed to go in a never ending loop...
It seems like they and I mean the Supreme Court refuse to just go ahead and make it clear that outside of a background check for violent felons, not being allowed to carry in courthouses and other government buildings and a few others things - all these gun laws have to go.
Guaranteed? Are you really going to submit so easily to the endless violation of your rights?
I say no. Easy? No. Worthwhile? Absolutely!
Please have courage and speak out. Thanks to heroes like Bill Paxton we fight on.
Lets do this...Since the ATF has such a problem with short barrels. Stop calling them suppressors and start calling them barral lengtheners.
If a suppressor is not a firearm, how possibly could the Alcohol, Tobacco, and FIREARM have ANY jurisdiction?
Everyday “amazing news “ means something might happen
I'm so sick of the crazy fear based meme leads.
The ATF has zero approval to regulate accessories.
Suppressors just save peoples’ hearing. The fact that they’re so hard to get is a crime.
"lack standing to bring this lawsuit, now under the concept of standing legal actions cannot be brought simply on the grounds that an individual or general group is just simply displeased with what the federal government is doing"
The entire legal system is in such an incoherent mess that it really needs to be reworked. What the "federal government" is doing is defying the constitution. All arguments are nonsense and a massive waste in time and money. Our system was never intended to be this complicated.
The federal government has been ignoring it since 1865
The federal government has been ignoring the Constitution outright since 1865
It will never be fixed. There are too many voting govt employees.
If the ATF were to be charged a DUI, they would argue that they were piloting a ship.
That's still a DUI lol
🤦🏻♂️
you can get a DUI riding a horse
Or bicycle, lawn mower, sitting in your car in your own driveway should I keep going?
That's "BUI", Boating Under Influence.🙄
If it's called the NFA and a suppressor is not a firearm, then why is it included in the NFA?
In My Humble Opinion,
It is because the U.S government wants "their" $200 in Tax Money for each and every Suppressor(Silencer) that is made and sold in this country !! !!
This is just MY OPINION, and your opinion may be different !! !!
.
It’s still having to pay extra for a right.
Stop taking our Constitutional rights away from us!!!!
Second Amendment rights!👍👍✊✊🙏🙏
So, you design a barrel with an integrated suppressor that the baffles and outer shells are replaceable if it's part of the gun by design it's no longer an accessory and the ATF can f**k off.
we need to take the F out of the ATF at this rate.
This means absolutely nothing for us living in the People's Republic of California.
It sets precedence if Texas wins up to the USSC level. But yes, it's a long road for California and would require a political renaissance. If I were in CA, I'd focus on voting laws and cleaning up that process. (Of course that's true for all states, isn't it?) CA's budget is unsustainable. It's teetering on the edge of bankruptcy and if that happens it could provide the impetus for that political swing; but without clean voting, you would never succeed.
Agreed. I’m waiting for the 10 round limits, the stupid AR compliant laws, the “roster” etc. silencers is waaaay down on our list
Commiefornia
OR THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF ILLINOIS EITHER COMRADE PRITZGER HAS EVEN MADE IT ILLEGAL TO HAVE ANY WEAPON WITH A THREADED BARREL!
Take away the Justices retirement if they violate the law themselves.
Everyone seems to miss the point ATF can't decide whats legal or isn't, they don't have that authority. Chevron needs to go.
We should have that case thrown out immediately! For every state. Not just Texas!
FJB FATF FDOJ and the rest of the three letter agencies.
Excuse me... would you mind if I add my ex-wife to that list? 😂
Just stays on the Courts MERRY-GO-ROUNDS.
Keep these Texas suppressor updates coming!!! Really appreciate you covering this!!
Tired of all this legal wrangling. ENOUGH.
Let's see this channel hit 700k and beyond. I hope those of us in the 2A community support channels like this that help to inform the people by liking and sharing these videos.
yet the government chooses to ignore the laws against marijuana
Prohibition has never succeeded in the history of mankind.
-
There are active drug dealers and drug users in prison. The war on drugs is a failure and successful in the war against our rights.
Or immigration
That’s why you do what you want. Just don’t talk about it.
@@Jason_556 Don't talk about what?
@@Master_Yoda1990 What you are doing. Do it and keep quiet.
It always impresses me how thorough you are. Good work, and thanks for putting in the effort to bring us these updates!
Thanks Anthony
🇺🇸👍
No his name is Tony montana
Standing is a terrible requirement. Citizens should be able to legally challenge unconstitutional laws and regulations on their face because they serve to chill our expression of said rights. The “harm” is that we are prevented from doing something we have a right to do, and that should be enough. We should not have to put ourself in legal danger in order to challenge a law.
Thanks for keeping the community informed Anthony.
If accessories how does ATF have jurisdiction...it doesn't congress hasn't authorized it.
If "accessories" are not firearms. then the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and FIREARMS has no authority to regulate them...
Keep up the hard work, it is appreciated
FJB
I say F'em all😮
To 🔥🔥🔥👹👺 that is!
Thank you ANTHONY.YOUR INFO IS VALUABLE
Suppressors are about to be legal like marijuana if your state allows it. What’s the current say on braces? I’m confused.
Yes what’s up with braces?
@@gallegaditastv28535th circuit is consolidating all the cases and is taking oral arguments August 5th
HELP MAKE SUPPRESSORS LEGAL ACROSS THE WHOLE COUNTRY PLZ
@@gallegaditastv2853not illegal yet
Thank you for all you do! You are on top of things and I appreciate you bringing the information.
Great Report. Thank You. AS
New to the channel. Excellent. What I tell anyone coming out here for the first time, is prepare to hydrate, constantly, REGARDLESS of the time of year they visit. I’ve seen folks dehydrate in the middle of winter here, with VERY unpleasant results. Make a large bottle of water your constant companion, year round !
fringe
noun
3a: something that is marginal, additional, or secondary to some activity, process, or subject
so to be IN fringe D would mean to regulate/legislate things that are marginal, additional, or secondary to firearms... not just the arms themselves. Plus nowhere in the 2nd amendment does it say "typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes." It just says shall not be infringed PERIOD.
Adjusting for inflation:
$200 in 1934
(When the tax stamp was instituted for NFA items)
Is equivalent to $2,820 in 2024 dollars
Which meant virtually no one in 1934 could afford to buy even one.
The depression started in 1929 just five years earlier.
It was dire straits at the time.
People were likely too distracted with starvation & extreme unemployment to care enough to fight the NFA.
Governments always exploit tragedies to gain more control.
How would it be, to have a gov't which worked to uphold your right to bear arms, or to speak freely, instead of always working to remove those rights? We're in a dark place. Our founders would be enraged at what this system has become.
I've heard this dismissal due to "STANDING" way too often over the last couple of year. Frankly...IT'S PISSING ME OFF!🤬
Thanks much for the update!
Thank you for your dedication in helping us to become armed scholars too!
Thank you for the information.
⛽️🚀🗽🇺🇸🙏 Pray hard and fight on!
Then why are suppressors regulated by the ATF if they are not considiered Firearms? That alone should put them out of their Jurisdiction. Along with other none firearm parts.
As usual, ATF wants to interpret the rules in their favor from opposing angles. First, suppressors are DEFINED as firearms under the NFA, so that ATF has jurisdiction by way of that definition. Yet, ATF wants to claim that suppressors are NOT firearms, so that the Second Amendment doesn't apply.
Short barrels now this , one step at a time the AFT and the NFA , are looseing 👍👍
I've been following this channel for a few months now and I like that we get a TLDR explanation of the cases, but I would also like a layman's bottom-line of "here's what all of that means". Sometimes, the importance of something gets lost in the sauce, I think. Thank you for being so straight forward with all of your videos and I hope you keep up the Good Fight
Thanks for the timely info.
If it's not arms, then why does the ATF have the right to have rules/laws restricting something that's not a firearm?
The ATF shouldn't be making any laws or rules. We have our representatives in Congress for that.
Getting the ATF hooks out of the suppressor issue is important, for a number of reasons. Most important is that if the ruling supports the ATF control of firearm accessories, the next target is likely to be night vision scopes, under the supposed use by dangerous snipers. Every rancher and farmer who routinely uses these scopes to take out marauding wild hogs would be affected, and the price of these items would skyrocket.
Thank you!!
Thank you
BRAVO..👍 Thank you..✌
Algorithm buster
Damn it! Build me up just to bring me down! I was ready to buy a suppressor without that administrative bs.
Always appreciate your videos
How many suppressed weapons have been used in the commission of a crime?
It is TOO. S L O W!
I still don’t understand why all these accessory and gun laws are not challenged and reviewed on (constitutional) grounds. It seems clear that these politicians have been slowly trampling the constitution for a long time now
Yep and getting paid hansomely while they do it.
@@charleswittmer agreed.
Deddlebock needs to figure out what interstate commerce is.
If an item never leaves the state in which it was manufactured, there absolutely cannot be interstate commerce & therefore his jurisdiction is nullified & void.
Wickard v Filburn
The supreme court granted itself immense power over every aspect of your life.
If the government says you're growing too much wheat, they found a way to justify it as a commerce issue.
And anything that touches the highway is interstate.
Supreme court justices are not elected officials, we do not vote for them, and they rule for their entire lives.
We call this a democracy.
If it's not a firearm? Why is ATF regulating it in the first place??
It's is a hearing devise. Shouldn't that be in the medical arena???
For the Algorisms
Thank You Anthony 👍😎👍
It's awesome that you have photos of Biden and Sotomayor smiling and laughing! 😂🎉😂🎉😂
As expected, this changes nothing for all of us across the country. We’re still forced to pay for a right, still forced to wait for something we’ve already paid for. It’s absolutely infuriating when you’ve saved your hard earned money to pay for something, pay this ridiculous tax, then wait for weeks, months, or longer, for permission to have what you’ve already purchased. To add insult to injury, these court cases seem to do nothing more than add false hope that buying something, going to the range, and spending quality time with your kids doing something you enjoy will no longer be held up by red tape.
Thanks!
Spot on sir.
Most people don't have a clue, but in many countries which uphold people's right to own & to use firearms for sport, recreation & self defense; the use of a noise suppressor is mandatory.
Yes
Curtail or do away with these fed agencies
Thanks
The supreme court has already ruled that a prerequisite can not be required to exercise any right so it will apply to the 2A as well, but government does not abide by any law, a well documented fact.
This applies to all rights.
A thing that is required as a prior condition for something else to happen or exist: "A right being the 2 can not have a condition to exercise it = Buying firearms, ammunition etc."
Required as a prior condition: Purchasing & bearing=carrying, licensing or any other restriction beforehand can not be required
Nice update.
Excellent analysis
Thx Anthony
If the silencer is not a”weapon itself”, they why does the ATF have any control over it????
And why can’t the Gov of TX just pass an Executive Order protecting suppressor owners?
Fuel for, you know, the thing.
Hello Al
⛽🚀
⛽🚀
Nice !
seems to be these 'wins' we get are mere 'implications' without anything actually happening in the name of the 2A...
This present doesn't want steates to control themselves Definitely 😮
Thx
The stares are going to have to challenge the feds. All of them.
The EPA a should encourage the use of suppressors. Tinnitus sucks!
Don’t forget to like subscribe and ring that bell
Good job
The Constitution contradicts the "standing rule". The Constitution states that states have the sovereign authority to protect its boarders, in essence its citizens, from foreign invasion. If a state can not act on behave of its citizens, this would not be so.
…..so nothing has changed….got it
I’m confused. If the atf is claiming that the suppressors are not firearms why are they regulating them? It’s out of their purview at that point I would think.
The law enforcement agencies don’t want citizens having them because during active shooter scenarios they can tell the difference in sound between their shots being suppressed and the shooter’s shots being sonic. It helps locate the suspect.
You have a constitutional right against self incrimination, so how can a court you to incriminate yourself to prove standing?