BREAKING!!! Immediate Nationwide Block of ATF Short Barreled Rifle & Pistol Brace Rule! Now What?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
- In this video I break down a huge decision issued which strikes down the ATF pistol brace rule nationwide and how the ATF is responding!
🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥
Instagram: / armedscholaryt
Twitter: / armedscholaryt
Twitch: / armedscholar
📷 My TH-cam Setup 📷
Camera: (Sony A7siii) amzn.to/36YIe96
Lens: (Tamron 17-28) amzn.to/3wSPn5H
Lighting: (GVM RGB) amzn.to/3zpDfdT
Microphone: (Rode Wireless) amzn.to/3iBgnkU
Camera Stand: (Broadcast Boom) amzn.to/2V7meWV
Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!
Join the newsletter: www.armedscholar.com/contact
Support the channel by subscribing and liking the video!
I got an email saying that I won. Is it a scam?
@@Captured-On-Camera-Reviewer ... of course not ... just put all your sensitive information in here and they will send you a big surprise ! 😅
So with about 60% being non subbed viewers . I would say you are in the upper Percent of the channels on youtube. With subbed viewers of your content being so high. 40% is rather F,ing Good. Just saying.
Next?
Abolish the ATF, of course!!!
It'll never happen, but it should!
Way back in the early 80s the NRA and the pro Gun lobby pressed Congress into abolishing the ATF. The reason they didn't go through with it was that the US Goverment was going to transfer ATF responsibilities to the Secret Service. The Gun Lobby ultimately decided to leave things as they were.
@@jmc041071 It just might actually happen.
@@scottfarmer4423 well I'll keep hoping. They're just a bunch of crooks and the main crook in charge is anti gun. How the hell does someone against guns get put in charge of the atf!
The ATF no longer have the power to come up with new rules, laws and or regulations, Because the Supreme Court of Justice just struck down CHEVRON, which means, government agencies no longer have the power to come up with new laws, rules and or regulations, therefore I wouldn't worry too much about that
Imagine if our government worked this hard to protect our rights. Wouldn't that be something....
Is it our government?
...or this hard to protect our borders...
Pretty sure our government was infiltrated by traitors and outsiders a long time ago. No true American would want anything banned, especially something so trivial as a stock or brace. All these laws are absolutely ridiculous and only exist to slowly eat our rights away.
I believe our government is too big for its britches and needs to be throttled back!!!!! All the 3 letter agencies need to have their funding cut and get them back to enforcing the laws put in place by Congress and not making laws by themselves!!!!!!!
IMO...it is a foreign entity (UN, WEF)that is pushing and funding these demons. They want us disarmed so it will be easier to make slaves of everyone and get rid of anyone who doesn't agree with the satanic agenda (agenda 2030)
The ATF never should have been created.
Rouge government since beginning. Interesting facts.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' (ATF) law enforcement legacy began in 1791 when the first tax on whiskey was passed under President George Washington and U.S. Department of the Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton.
@@smas3256:
That tax on alcohol and tobacco products only lasted until 1802. [Fire]Arms were not taxed until 1934, when the Democrat Party created the "National Firearms Act of 1934", creating a tax equivalent to 100+% "taxation". The responsibility for collecting this patently UNconstitutional "tax" was given to the Alcohol Tax Unit (ATU) of the Treasury Department, created after passage of Amendment XXI abolished Prohibition. That unit lasted until after passage of the Democrat Party's "Gun Control Act of 1968", which the Democrats derived from an archived copy of the "Nazi Weapons Laws of 1938". The ATU subsequently "morphed" into the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) ... narcissisticly self-named as "ATF" ... in 1972. There is no *actual* constitutional authority for the "F" part to ever have been created in the first place.
@smas3256 the whiskey rebellion
Should've been a government store.
Thank Ronald Reagan's signing of the Hughes amendment also for that.
Rid congress and the presidency of the violators of this world's best CONSTITUTION!!
It’s time for the ATF to be defunded, disbanded and dissolved. It’s government sanctioned harassment keeping the agency
Throw in the department of education and you got yourself a deal!
Regards,
Andy. Annmarie's husband
The ATF no longer have the power to come up with new rules, laws and or regulations, Because the Supreme Court of Justice just struck down CHEVRON, which means, government agencies no longer have the power to come up with new laws, rules and or regulations, without the approval of Congress, therefore I wouldn't worry too much about that
Turn the ATF into a retail store front.
TILL THEY ARE OUTLAWED WITHIN THE USA AS FEDERAL GOVERNMETS HARRASSMENT OF THE LEGAL CITIZENS !...
atf doesnt need to exist. tobacco killing millions of people, alcohol killing millions of people guns killing thousands and most of them by police.
they exist for what reason? to make tobacco safe for public use yet all these vapes go pretty much unregulated.
alcohol for what reason? you can go to pretty much any store and buy it yet it causes so many types of cancer.
firearms for what reason? turning law abiding citizens into felons for no reason at all. while the dangerous felons who dont care about the law illegally carry...
there is no reason for the atf to exist... none
Sounds like the atf is wasting a lot of taxpayers money and should be canceled forever
All federal agencies should be cancelled. Leave everything to the states.
@@FunWithDHG almost all, with very few exceptions, which the states and/or people approve through voting
Biden is in charge of the ATF. The ATF is acting in a manner that is in violation of the Constitution. Therefor, Biden should be impeached and then tried for Treason.
@@FunWithDHGnot all! Leave the post office alone lol, cuz I work there.
Why should I be waiting 80 plus days to get a TUBE WITH METAL BAFFLES!!
A SUPPRESSOR!
A CAR MUFFLER ON THE END OF MY GUN TO PROTECT MY HEARING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CORRUPT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No more ATF & NFA.
The ATF no longer have the power to come up with new rules, laws and or regulations, Because the Supreme Court of Justice just struck down CHEVRON, which means, government agencies no longer have the power to come up with new laws, rules and or regulations, without the approval of Congress, therefore I wouldn't worry too much about that
What did NFA do?
@@Smoketownedctax stamps on suppressors and sbrs and sbs
@@Smoketownedcmade it that a “legal” rifle barrel was 16” or longer and anything shorter was considered an SBR (short barreled rifle). Shotguns are 18” as was rifles, but the gubment sold a bunch (100s of thousands?) of old surplus rifles to the public, but they only had 16” barrels so everyone who bought one was now a felon. The powers that be then changed the law/rule to 16” to prevent everyone from being a felon or having to pay the tax and register. There’s a bunch of other stuff in it as well involving suppressors and other things. That’s just my vague recollection but there’s more to it. NFA requires you to have a welded on muzzle device on a 14.5” to make it 16” but then you’re stuck with that device and can’t change gas blocks or decide on a different muzzle device. It’s stupid.
Loss of chevron deference should end every atf rule not written into law.
It should. But it won't.
Agreed, it should immediately render all of those “opinions” null and void. They will most likely all have to be challenged in court one by one unless at some point SCOTUS directly addresses authority of ATF “opinions” in a future ruling.
Only for vague laws
@@Asertix357The incoming lawsuits definitely will do the job.
Every "rule" every federal agency pulls out of its azz should have a lawsuit attached to it.
Congress needs to be forced to do their job and hold a vote on every *rule" proposed by federal agencies that are treated as a law by the agencies that enforce them as such.
@iknklst, Yes and those law suits should come with big payouts to citizens for deprivation of rights under color of law.
Who pays for ATF’s lawyers us taxpayers if so why can’t we get funding from the government for our suits ?
Because your not ATF, cmon brother, get with the show.
To them, you’re the enemy.
Because if BOTH sides got unlimited funding, we'd kick their asses all the time
Good luck with that .
A valid question, especially if we had a constitutional government. ATF is proof that we do not.
Why are there no lawsuits stating that there is no text, History ,or tradition of taxing, regulating, or registering firearms that are in common use by the length of their barrel? The whole thing is unconstitutional. No need for a pistol brace at that point...
Abolish the ATF, period.
It is absolutely time that atf’s Rouge actions have been stopped and no longer allowed to infringe upon law abiding citizens of this country!
The ATF no longer have the power to come up with new rules, laws and or regulations, Because the Supreme Court of Justice just struck down CHEVRON, which means, government agencies no longer have the power to come up with new laws, rules and or regulations, without the approval of Congress, therefore I wouldn't worry too much about that
*rogue
@@joearceneaux9854 red flag laws are rouge!
Rouge Flag laws?
@@USMCM16A2I mean it works lol
The ATF's overreach on pistol braces has been a hot topic, and it's great to see a decision that respects our rights.
Fck the fuggin ATF!!! I never listen to those unconstitutional gay bois ''rules.'' My MP5 has had a folding pistol brace this whole time. Like I said, Fck the ATF.
The ATF no longer have the power to come up with new rules, laws and or regulations, Because the Supreme Court of Justice just struck down CHEVRON, which means, government agencies no longer have the power to come up with new laws, rules and or regulations, therefore I wouldn't worry too much about that
The ATF no longer have the power to come up with new rules, laws and or regulations, Because the Supreme Court of Justice just struck down CHEVRON, which means, government agencies no longer have the power to come up with new laws, rules and or regulations, without the approval of Congress, therefore I wouldn't worry too much about that
Your right is to own a gun, not nonsense like this and bumps 🙄👍
What?@@Nite2012Mare
18 U.S.C. § 242
This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus
Why are We the people allowing the atf an agency funded with public tax dollars being allowed to continually abuse our justice system at the expense of tax payers ? Atf should be abolished
ATF does NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO BAN ANYTHING, ONLY CONGRESS CAN DO IT!
No, Congress cannot make illegal laws.
Neither can ban anything weapon related. Shall not be infringed
@@steelcorpse1 AGREED. Some people will still try to take our rights away, even if SCOTUS makes a ruling. Just like the "loan forgiveness"
I love how people keep saying they cant when they clearly do all the time. Literally all the time. Saying they cant is living in a fictional reality. They can and they do all the time.
@@Msantor1605 SCOTUS IS FINALLY CRACKING DOWN ON THEIR B S. DOING AND HAVING AUTHORITY SEEM TO BE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS THESE DAYS. Democrats don't care about rule of law, they never have!!
ATF and NFA need to be DOA
Get rid of the 68 GCA as well
i keep saying all the rope we nee dis at lowes and home depot why havent we started the rope parties?
Awwww poor ATF they don't get to tyrannize as much 😂
The ATF no longer have the power to come up with new rules, laws and or regulations, Because the Supreme Court of Justice just struck down CHEVRON, which means, government agencies no longer have the power to come up with new laws, rules and or regulations, without the approval of Congress, therefore I wouldn't worry too much about that
Defund the ATF !!!
Why are they arguing what law abiding Americans can and cannot do?
Why are they not increasing consequences on actual criminals?
Because they don't protect citizens, there whole creation is to put law abiding citizens in jail.
Not only is the SCOTUS making some good rulings about the 2A but Chevron Deference should shut down these letter agencies from issuing "rules".
Laws are made by legislature.
Period.
So for now, "Ding-dong, the rule is dead!" Hopefully, Chevron will be the final nail in it's coffin.
What is the penalty for violating millions of citizens Constitutional rights??? 🇺🇸
THIS is exactly what I've been saying. Once a government act or law is struck down as unconstitutional, the responsible parties should all be charged with treason and dealt with as such. Suddenly there would be a lot more respect for Constitutional protections. As it is, there's just a little pie in the face and then they go right back to the drawing board for another try.
Really? The final RULE, is that there's no more rules. Laws only. "Chevron is overruled"
Someone gets the notion!!
Hurrah!!!
Why is it that our governments bosses are so afraid of our weapons?
Because it’s been proven the cheat in elections which means we have a banana republic and are scared of the people
They know the jig is up! ....time to water the tree 🎄
Because a group of unarmed sightseers was enough to almost overthrew the government simply by entering the capitol building when votes were being counted. Literally a hair's breadth away from democracy and rule of law going away forever.
Convenient they want their security teams to have what we can't 🤔🤔
Because the founding fathers gave us them rights to defend against the government if they became tyrannical we scare them
Our supreme court is gutless. Its called shall not be infringed. I am not a lawyer but i can read.
Yes, but SCOTUS has no history of interpreting this as a right to any and all arms. On the contrary, past rulings have recognized the idea of limits for private ownership.
Let’s focus on reversing state “rosters”, feature restrictions, magazine limits, etc. If we just get recognition for common usage semi auto rifles with normal capacity magazines and whatever furniture we want to put on them, that would be a huge win (especially for all our fellow citizens in Blue jurisdictions - an infringement against one is an infringement against all).
@@brawndothethirstmutilator9848 what's normal capacity? That's an infringement too?
@@brawndothethirstmutilator9848the purpose of the 2nd amendment was to give citizens the right to be equally armed against the government. It does not stipulate except this weapon or that weapon.
There is no such thing as a "short barreled: rifle!
Correct. It's either a rifle, carbine or pistol. The length of the barrel should have no bearing on wether or not it is illegal without a tax stamp. Essentially the tax stamp is unconstitutional because it taxes a right.
Somehow decreased muzzle velocity and diminished range makes a rifle more dangerous. How? Don’t know….
The rule should only apply to shot guns
@@charliecharlie9787 not even shot guns, it's shouldn't apply to anything.
@charliecharlie9787 No. The term "riding shotgun" came from the stage coach days. The man in that position carried a sawed off double barreled shotgun.
I knew the Scotus would destroy past illegal gun restrictions. This is a breath of fresh air. Thank you Pres. Trump.
The good thing he did was have Thomas in seat. However, keep in mind it was Trump who was in on bump stock bans, leading to this entire pistol brace issue. And then there's the Red Flag laws he applauded. You read that right.
I prefer him over Biden, but let's not kid ourselves that he's who we need in the White House.
We got a little lucky honestly. Yes, he did appoint them though. I am voting for him but lets not forget his agreement to make bump stocks illegal, which was scrapped this year in a ruling.
@@RealSugam*What about his response when asked about Red flag laws?*
*”I like taking the guns first and going to court later”*
@@RealSugamalso, Trump supports red flag laws
Yep!@@RealSugam
Thanks Anthony 🇺🇸👊🏽
Thanks for watching!
We beat medicare
Let's go Brandon, I agree.
LMFAO! Yup!!!!
Stop the malarkey
Rrumph a gurgle shep inger diller......(blank stare)....Jill, did I do good?
Finally!
Anthony is a real Lawyer. Those working for ATF are Court Room Ninjas ( insult intended).
ATF leave citizens alone and let freedom ring !
Disband the NFA . SBR & SUPRESSORS SHALL NOT BE REGULATED
Checks and ballances....no single government entity has all the power
The ATF no longer have the power to come up with new rules, laws and or regulations, Because the Supreme Court of Justice just struck down CHEVRON, which means, government agencies no longer have the power to come up with new laws, rules and or regulations, without the approval of Congress, therefore I wouldn't worry too much about that
part of the Woodrow Wilson plan when they established ‘experts’ to run the government.
Great to see the ATF put in their place. When I was a kid ATF agents were busting kids buying tobacco and beer, not this kind of unconstitutional bullshit.
How about they just keep their unelected noses out of constantly trying to infringe on our constitutional right and leave us law abiding citizens alone
How about that?
Defund the ATF
Free Matt Hoover NOW !!
Thanks again Anthony
👍🇺🇸
I mean chevron says they should probably stop now😊
sure, but what is their penalty if they do not? The problem is that there is no defined penalty for going against the chevron ruling. The penalty should be prison for a minimum of 5 years and a personal fine of 1 million minimum.
@SomeReefer, Paydays to citizens for deprivation of rights under color of law which in turn bankrupts the ATF would happen in a just and sane 2A nation. (Notice the hypothetical…)
Chevron differences should depend on what gas station you go to to buy gas not some ABC agency making law
Thank you for taking the time to update us!
The fall of Chevron Deference should eliminate the ATF pistol brace cases.
Once again thank you for keeping us updated on these important civil rights issues.
Nice to hear some good news! Thank you.
I really don't "have a dog in this fight", meaning I don't own a controversial firearm. But I really don't see the big deal.
Since the Supreme Court has already ruled that when it comes to firearms laws, we MUST consider history and tradition. I would be willing to wager that in a museum somewhere, there's a rifle or musket from colonial times, where the original owner cut the barrel down to make it easier to use in a buggy or coach.
Technically, "SBR"s have always been around and I recall specific regiments/units even using them as far back as the US revolution. They are not standard but they have their use in specific situations.
With their tendency to nibble away at 2A rights what wasn't ever considered controversial today can be changed by their rules or interpretations tomorrow. They have decided to turn law abiding citizens into criminals overnight with the stroke of a pen more than once.
Remember, the Bruen test is text first, followed by historical tradition of firearms regulations. If the conduct addressed by the statute or rule implicates the TEXT of the 2nd Amendment (as virtually anything pertaining to firearms automatically does since ALL firearms are arms), the conduct is presumptively protected by the 2A. At that point, THE BURDEN SHIFTS to the government to come forth with MULTIPLE, widely accepted analogous laws on the books and that were actually enforced at the time of the ratification of the 2A (1791) addressing the same societal problem in the same way. If the government does not identify multiple (i.e., widely accepted) specific historical laws implementing a tradition of a specific type of firearms regulation that was meant to address the same type of societal problem and that operated in the same way from the founding era, the modern day law being challenged is presumptively unconstitutional!
The pro-2A side NEVER bears the burden to provide a historical counterargument to a technical firearms regulation to win the case except to point out limitations to the government's claimed historical analogs. We win by default. The court must abide by the 2nd Amendments "unqualified command" (i.e., shall not be infringed.)
"History" of the kind proffered by (revisionist) historians does us no good, except when it can be used as a confirmatory example to discredit supposed government analogous regulations.
The only history that matters is history of the laws actually on the books and enforced in enough jurisdictions as to establish that it was the prevailing theory at the time of the founding that an analogous law pertaining to specific conduct with arms would have been deemed acceptable under the 2A. There isn't much for the government to work with: basically, don't murder, rape, or rob people using guns and expect to get away with it using the 2A as your defense. That is pretty much the only relevant historical tradition of firearms regulation.
Own whatever you want. Carry whatever you want wherever you want, basically. That's the core protection of the 2A.
Thomas's seeting up Stare Decisis as THE main guiding principle to decide legality of laws.
Why? He wants the ancient scotus law: constitutional sheriffs law... which, by the by, he gifted to the LDS Church #DEZNAT mormon cult? To become THE BIG LAW. Because LDS Church & #DEZNAT cult laws & rules go very far back to knites templar stuff.
Thomas is setting us up.
@@rabidsbr Look at what you wrote. It's a 100% illegal interpretation of 2a.
Shall not be INFRINGED. All these little side laws? Are simply ILLEGAL.
While we're at it why do we need homeland security to protect foreign criminals
❓❓❓❓❓
🤔
Intriguing question . . .
👍
And here i am in Illinois scratching my head.
Lol I'm genuinely sorry, man. It's no fun. Michigan is starting to get ideas like Illinois which is a huge bummer for us. It may be time to look for a new state to call home. Best wishes, my dude.
Get out.
If I didn't have family ties or something keeping me in Illinois I would think about moving. Fighting a state government that won't adhere to the constitution or the supreme court is a losing battle. Sure, giving up on your state doesn't seem like a patriotic thing to do but if enough people leave those tax dollars will leave as well.
@Mythicalniceguy, Abandoning ship just causes it to spread unopposed. Soon there will be nowhere to run to.
Plus, an infringement against one is an infringement against all. Fellow citizens living deprived of rights can’t be abandoned or told to retreat.
@@brawndothethirstmutilator9848truth
Pray for our nation.
Thank you for all the information and everything you and the others are doing.
Thanks! Keep up the Great work. Appreciate you keeping us all informed.
Thank you for your support! I appreciate you watching!
Do these judges, being human as well as privileged with power, understand that all ATF proposals are aimed only at incrementally disarming lawful citizens?
The ATF has out lived it's usefulness. Disband the ATF !!!
Yeah, they can't sort out NICS after all this time but teenagers on the Southside of Chicago have gen 5 Glocks with switches.... They can only expect law abiding citizens to even consider their overreach, but they can't actually stop felons who have guns illegally
Thanks for the consistent updates over the years
Thanks for keeping us up to date!
We need to stop funding these three letter agencies. The country is so under water in debt we'll never get out.
Komifornia here Al Gore ithyms fueled. Guns and guitars brother and thanks for the update. CRPA member. C'mon SCOTUS
Moved from California to a freer state and man feels good to actually own a gun and not need to have any worries.
Great channel. Thanks for keeping us informed.
Again, thank you so much for what you do for the TH-cam 2A community. Your dedication, and the way you verse the facts, are why I am subscribed. The best!
The real problem is barrel length regulations. They make no sense, and complicate everything.
Trump needs to abolish the ATF, FBI, CIA, NSA, DEA, and the rest of the alphabet.
Also UN,WHO, WEF, FEDERAL RESERVE, BLACKROCK, VANGUARD, LOBBYING WHICH IS A TERM TO COVER BRIBERY, NOA, CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX, ALL PROPAGANDA APARATIS NETWORKS WORLD WIDE SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORKS, ALL WORLD WIDE SURVALANCE NETWORKS AND THE INSTALLMENT OF THE WORLD WIDE DIGITAL CURRENCY APARATIS, ETC... AND MOST DEFINITELY BIG PHARMA NEEDS TO BE STRIPPED OF THE BILLIONS THEY'VE MADE AND USED TO PAY ALL THE DAMAGE THEY'VE DONE TO HUMAN BEINGS WORLD WIDE!!!!
Pipe dreamer. Trump is a swampything. This ship is going down.
I dont think he wants to get shot messing with those nasty Thugs. He'll end up like a certain president we all liked very much. He was going to cut up the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the wind. We all know what that got him. ABSOLUTE HORROR!
Well done Sir!
Nice thanks for the update and the hard work you do 💪
Hi there Counselor,
Good day here...
Thanks for the exciting content, very much appreciated.
We value the hardwork and effort in putting this placate.
Kind regards here in
Miramar, CA. Fightertown USA.
🇺🇸👍
Carry on 😊
Thank you for all you do for us!
Thank you for the continual updates😊
The ATF is a legal agency that occasionally do law enforcement. They are too busy wasting our taxes on defending unconstitutional rules in court or letting local PD deal with it.
Illegal agency mostly.
Thank you
You're welcome!
Thank you for all you do for us.
Whatever you do man keep up the great work with the videos! I live in California, turned 19 not long ago and am fairly new gun owmer. Your videos keep information and law updates that ALL gun owners need to know. Your videos have helped me understand better the laws in my state and helped me decide which firearm I would be more comfortable with considering all the changes in laws constantly. I'm sure others can say the same. You're amazing and you're also spreading the awareness of the corrupt system to those who would have never thought twice of the government. Much love from Cali ♥️💪
Is anyone else getting dizzy over all this?
Only if you’re holding your breathe
Yes does a case ever get settled?
once you cease to comply the spins go away.
They just need to remove SBR period.
Thanks for the keeping up and sharing the news. you have my Subscription.
😊 Thanks for the news! I feel in the know!!,
Is there any reason why you can't just state the bottom line in laymen terms then provide the details?
This dudes a fkn nerd he just likes hearing himself talk
Let's go!
👍🇺🇸
Thanks For The Consistent Updates 🤙🏿🇺🇸
Thank you for all the work you do
Hell yeah
🇺🇸👍
Whats everyones thoughts on felon gun ban? Should non violent felons have their rights back?
Non violent? Of course. I don't trust p.o.s murderer's n never will
Yes
Absolutely
The 2A says shall not be infringed. If every citizen carried the violent ones wouldn't be violent for long it would cost us at first but freedom has never been free.
Yep, I've always said if a person is too dangerous to ever be able to own a gun again then they're too dangerous to ever be in society again.
We do appreciate your efforts.
Very concise and clear explanation, as always. Keep it up. Liked, commented, and, of course, subscribed and notifications on!
Your solution is to talk to us as gun owners, not lawyers. I am so proud of you for stepping up your game, but you need to be more relaxed in your delivery and boil it down for us in a nugget.
8:15-8:25 no impact nationwide.
Thanks breaking that down for us! Subbed and Liked!
Thanks for the clarity!
So, quick question, if it's not ok for the ATF to make this rule, can California still do it?
Not if it goes against the Federal law following the Constitution. But the State can do other things to screw with the 2A. Scotus may then nullify those rulings also. Got em on the run for a change. If we lose the majority in Scotis, the laws may shift back later even though the Leftists are screaming about bias in the rulings, their people would bias things also. Kiss our grits. Good rulings be happening. Constitutional.
1st to like and 1st to comment! Love all u do! ❤ 🇺🇸🔫
Lol...not even close..
Got beat today!
I love your videos. Thank you for all the hard work you do to bring us the current information. It's greatly appreciated.
Great work and coverage!
⛽️🚀 🇺🇸
⛽🚀
always the salt
🎉🎉🎉
🇺🇸👍
Thank you for the helpful and informative update.
Thank you for the all your hard work❤
Yo
🇺🇸👍
Both Navy & Marine Exchanges send me sale brochures featuring guns and "Not available in CA & HA." Maybe that will change by November.
Thanks for this video and keeping us 2A supporters informed. 🇺🇸
Keep up the good work!
If you would just be a bit more clear and concise describing the matters you discuss, rather than the long winded legal jargon that most don't want to hear, or understand, you may win over a bit of that 60% unsubscribed. Most people want the simplest form of explanation. That doesn't mean it has to be dumbed down. Just clear, and to the point.
Yes please , agree 100%we need a clear conclusion without those legal references
First!!!
🇺🇸🇺🇸
love ya, m'man, may God bless you!