It’s not blasphemy laws Lee Anderson needs to fear, it’s defamation laws, since he was thick enough to tell this particular lie about Saddiq Khan outside of Parliament, so it’s not protected by privilege.
Pretty much throughout our history until they were abolished in 2008 (England and Wales) and 2021 (Scotland). Blasphemy laws remain in Northern Ireland.
I spend my time as a nursery practitioner teaching the children to look beyond the obvious by asking “why” until I get them to see the end point. It’s the only tool we, the public need (apart from reading extensively) to wade through the propaganda and misinformation.
@@PoldarkGodzilla Read Noam Chomsky & Edward S. Herman`s `The Manufacture of Consent` or, read up on Edward L. Bernays`s work in propaganda & rebranding it as "public relations," but I don`t know of anything that Hitchens wrote on propaganda. I know of an interview he did on George Orwell about, "all art is propaganda, but not all propaganda is art." Are you going off topic & trying to make it about religion? I`m not a fan of religion either & would even call myself an antitheist too, but one thing at a time.
If only that was practiced beyond & throughout a child`s whole time in school. Not that critical thinking is encouraged when it comes to the electorate. That`s the last thing the establishment wants.
@@PoldarkGodzillathe otherwise brilliant guy who ended up promoting Western wars in the middle east at the end of his life? The irony is, he made a name for himself being a critic of religion but he ended on the side of Christian fanatics in the US who see military intervention in the middle east as a modern day crusade.
@@brianpark8758 read some Yasmine Mohammed , ayaan hirshi Ali , try living in a largely Islamic country and see where your free speech gets you , speak to salman Rushdie and stop citing far left academics 😂
The moment Sangita saw his previous call on the screen and had the transcript was the best bit for me! These people don't even realise their words are all recorded.
@@zzsmile1 'Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of SIX YEARS of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.' Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236 *6* Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was SIX YEARS old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death). Sahih Bukhari 7:62:64 *6* 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was SIX YEARS old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old. Sahih Muslim 8:3310 *6*
They are scared of a radicalised muslim mob, they need to be honest like Starmer. The protestors know this. The white lefty protestors want to pretend its not happening.
The Prophet said, "Isn't the witness of a women equal to half that of a man?" The women said "yes". He said "This is because of the deficiency of the women's mind." Sahih Bukhari 3:48:826
This is what happens after 40 years underinvestment in state education😂😂😂what a muppet the caller was -he had no evidence -couldn’t answer any of the question .
O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people. Quran 5:51
Regards the Rotherham grooming scandle, this dispute can be settled by publishing a spreadsheet listing all the gromminhg offenders caught, stating their nationality / ethnicity and religion. Then if the allegations are not true, it will be plain to see. All the reports so far appear to be very wordy but completely lacking in any rogorous data.
As far as data analysis goes defining grooming gang its too broad a term. So the data wouldn’t tell you anything and data scientists probably wouldnt be agree on a definition.
Surely the best thing to do would be list the religion and race of every crime committed in the country. I’m sure this would show how they’re all done by extremists. Like remember that time when the media would tell us of that white Christian male who committed a crime…o wait🤔
@@whackeryounis Hmm.... Did you miss Jimmy Savile? Or the endless reports of Catholic and Protestant priests/vicars and what they got up to? Jersey care homes? The list goes on.
There’s something that we can’t underestimate, the power of street wise, someone that sits in the office, doesn’t know what happens in the streets, something I admire when I came here were the patriotism of English people, they love their country
@@mickgascoigne4003he listed many. she gave him many times to back up his statements, he couldn’t and when he tried she had better knowledge than him. he’s a clown.
@@anthonysmith7014 Arrogant and ignorant egos do get humiliated by that. All they know are the opinions they've been fed based on distortions of facts and cherry-picking to fit an agenda. There is truth though that both sides of political belief systems have agendas, and these two extremes have been getting used and stirred up by the media and politicians so massively via the internet that it's almost completely co-opted the whole of society into a largely manufactured drama. The internet has completely changed everything and made all the problems we already had in society about a hundred times worse than ever before. We have access to so much information constantly now that instead of everyone becoming really wise and intelligent, the vast majority of people are just being royally fooled and profoundly confused about almost everything. The endless and increasingly vapid and artless entertainment industries are pumping out vast quantities of brain "content" like never before and people are therefore able to lose themselves so much in all that, they don't have any incentive to really face life properly anyway - especially considering most folk are so bogged down working their lives away, how can you even blame them for not having anywhere near enough energy and vitality to confront and do anything about all this increasingly complex and overwhelming world?
She has been trained to debate. Training that the ordinary man/woman does not have. She isn't any more right than the caller here - just better at debating than he was. If there's ever an unbearable presenter who doesn't represent the people of this country, then it's this lady right here.
It’s quite easy we have an Islamist problem when you see what happening in pro Palestine marches , David Amis killed and another Tory mp threatened with homophobic and anti semetic comments he had to stand down from his role , look the other at lefty 😂
The evidence being on film when 2 officers arrest an old man for carrying the union Jack and asked why they don't arrest some demonstrators their answer was there's more of them than us.
After being invited over to do jobs they cba'd doing lol. Look at the recent influx of nigerian and indian nurses. These callers no doubt love their NHS but struggle to work in it!
It would have been nice to actually hear the guys point of view ,I don't know why people phone these shows ,it's bordering semantics if it wasn't so serious.
@@Maynards_so_blue did you actually watch the video? There were huge pauses as he tried to verbalise his mental gymnastics. What were his valid points? They were all deconstructed using evidence.
@@ytsm you appear to be suffering from myopic memory. To suggest that they have time to arrest people for publishing adverse comments/tweets etc. is the actual naivety at play here. The ridiculousness is having to respond to such projected naiveté in the first place.
Moreover London has become Stabcity under Khan lousy leadership and the Tories has exercised zero control over UK southern border whilst LBC tells us of all the wonderful doctors, engineers etc that come in illegally. Thing is we don’t all agree with this!
This interviewer is nothing but a bully who takes delight in humiliation off the caller. It's easy for her when there's a team doing her research and feeding her questions to ask.
some were FRIGHTENED. Yes the ones that were supposed to be doing there job were FRIGHTENED to open their mouth because of the consequences. She should be sacked.
This woman should be taken off air forthwith. She obviously agrees with the hold islamists have in this country and the fear intimidation and violence to our authorities that comes with it.Basically she is a fine example of what this country has become and the positions they hold , she being in one of them.
t's intriguing that those who support this caller struggle with grammar. Their capability to construct strong arguments through reasoning and critical thinking is already flawed 😂
A certain teacher in batley comes to mind that had to flee for his life in a secret location, the only difference between these two are she has learned over years on how to talk over others and try to belittle, the lad just isn't articulate enough to get his point across , if she was to debate maajid nawaz she would get a lesson
Yep!... Plus the guy who held up a sign saying Hama's are terrorist and was attacked by protesters - what happened to him - oh the police moved him on and and told him to remove his sign 🤦
She was brilliant In this interview. Stuttering and lying he sounded like an idiot. Without evidence you can't spread lies. She annihilated him what a tool 😂
@@nihilistlivesmattercaller had NOTHING to back there claim, sangita had a rebuttal l, that’s not gaslighting, maybe we would take u seriously if u learned what words mean
Sangita… it’s pretty obvious that you are not impartial. You take the analysis of written statements over the obvious. For instance, you can argue math and science, place words to describe and mock explanations… however, it’s pretty obvious when a square peg won’t fit into a round hole!
If she kept quiet, this idiot would just have spouted more of his lies. She pointed out where he was incorrect and invited him to clarify. The fact that he was unable to back-up his arguments, tells you all you need to know about his case.
She shut him up what a tool he is. Stuttering trouble maker he is. No evidence no evidence just call names when you feel like. She absolutely was spot on. Urgh he is horrible imagine there are people like him living near to you.
@@czgibson3086 Tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. He tried to tell her she knew nothing, she proved otherwise. He phoned the wrong presenter If he was hoping to blind them with ‘facts’.
Have you seen LBC before? Pretty much all of their presenters have a bias (and not all in the same direction). What did she say here that was biased? It is only biased to criticise what Anderson said if you think that he represents the "centre ground".
I’m not a fan of Sangita’s interviewing style (regardless of the topic). Doesn’t listen to the caller’s opinion, condescends and laughs throughout. Laughing and putting your hands over your face constantly doesn’t do her or the debate any favours.
She literally gives them the opportunity to talk and then asks them to provide the evidence for their opinions. That’s how proper argument work. Your opinion on any subject should be based on whatever available facts there may be, if you can’t back up an opposing argument then it’s just something you think incorrectly. The guy has no idea what he’s talking about and she’s just proving that by asking him the right questions and exposing his ignorance.
Although both interviews and interrogations seek information, an interview is a more informal procedure, while an interrogation involves formally questioning a person who has information about an alleged crime. Interrogatories are a discovery tool that parties can use to receive answers to specific questions about a case before trial. This is not a debate and Mark, the radio listener, did not commit any crime. Samgita Myska interrogated Mark, as if he were a criminal.
@@weswheel4834 she condemned the abuse not the abusers then she condemned the institutions that allowed it. Better not mention the demographic of the abusers eh.
@@stephenwarburton1816 My point was that she probably didn't think she needed to explicitly condemn the abusers for obvious reasons. Do you think that everybody needs to condemn the abusers in every conversation, or only brown people?
What is it with LBC hosts? Argumentative, Arrogant, Condescending, Headwobblig, Looking down individuals intent only on preventing the caller from makinging their point
Team Caller✊🏽… This interviewer is clearly unnerved by the caller,, she’s interrupting him many times and trying to make him look a fool,, but she is looking petulant and an Islamic sympathiser…. She’s pathetic😡
We westerners don’t have a problem criticising our own but look at her as an example, she will twist and turn every word and deny any evidence and corner a simple caller with her journalistic wisely words. Just like Baroness Warsi. She would rather be on the side of Sadiq Kahn than her own party but instead suggested Suella Braverman should leave the Tory party. What a piece of work!
@@allanmckeown8417yes the man wasn’t articulate enough but it’s intuition and life experience (being from Rotherham) were making him a more honest interlocutor.
@@Uliengue sorry if you think of me this way but maybe you should also be more convincing instead of getting frustrated with the person you are debating.
25 years ago I would never have envisaged this kind of conversation taking place. GB has changed hugely. We now have many many people who are "enriching" our culture and values with their diverse cultural, political and religious values. I have to ask myself what bit of their culture and religion has actually enhanced our way of life ?
Caller you speak truth,we are 100% with you👍,sangeeta drips with condesension &constantly interrupted you & patronised you, but you are right,thankyou😊
I had friends/well more so acquaintances in the Police, and I used to listen in to some of their stories. One thing that did crop up once or twice was that if they had to go to question/arrest someone in a mostly Muslim area/street, they either went super nice "Please come out" in order not to upset the locals who often defended any of their own no matter what they were being arrested for or, they had to send extra Police to watch each others backs. Now, I would think the same goes for any street community, but seeing as London is turning more Muslim by the day, the pure maths of it says that as the numbers grow, so does their influence/power.
Should Humza Yousaf be fired for his "too white, white white comment or is there a double standard again like our police force
Loool what?
Double standards obviously
He will be out of a job at the next election anyway
YES!!!
What's it got to do with this?
He’s not gonna get anywhere with this one,it’s plain to see what’s going on in London to anyone with there eyes open.
Please enlighten us?
Ooh - do tell.
Did you take a walk on London bridge on Saturday night ? Of course not, if you had, you wouldn't need to be enlightened.🤦
@@tonywilson8681 keep those blinkers on ....🙈
@@williamdew7143 yes you are just another one.... spec saviors may help!😂
*Since when did Britain have blasphemy laws.*
It’s not blasphemy laws Lee Anderson needs to fear, it’s defamation laws, since he was thick enough to tell this particular lie about Saddiq Khan outside of Parliament, so it’s not protected by privilege.
Pretty much throughout our history until they were abolished in 2008 (England and Wales) and 2021 (Scotland). Blasphemy laws remain in Northern Ireland.
They’ll be here soon fella
@@allip4226 its not a lie though is it!
@@cpa2788 thats not England though is it!
The dude got humiliated 😂😂😂😂
I spend my time as a nursery practitioner teaching the children to look beyond the obvious by asking “why” until I get them to see the end point. It’s the only tool we, the public need (apart from reading extensively) to wade through the propaganda and misinformation.
Read some Christopher Hitchens
@@PoldarkGodzilla Read Noam Chomsky & Edward S. Herman`s `The Manufacture of Consent` or, read up on Edward L. Bernays`s work in propaganda & rebranding it as "public relations," but I don`t know of anything that Hitchens wrote on propaganda. I know of an interview he did on George Orwell about, "all art is propaganda, but not all propaganda is art." Are you going off topic & trying to make it about religion? I`m not a fan of religion either & would even call myself an antitheist too, but one thing at a time.
If only that was practiced beyond & throughout a child`s whole time in school. Not that critical thinking is encouraged when it comes to the electorate. That`s the last thing the establishment wants.
@@PoldarkGodzillathe otherwise brilliant guy who ended up promoting Western wars in the middle east at the end of his life? The irony is, he made a name for himself being a critic of religion but he ended on the side of Christian fanatics in the US who see military intervention in the middle east as a modern day crusade.
@@brianpark8758 read some Yasmine
Mohammed , ayaan hirshi Ali , try living in a largely Islamic country and see where your free speech gets you , speak to salman Rushdie and stop citing far left academics 😂
The moment Sangita saw his previous call on the screen and had the transcript was the best bit for me! These people don't even realise their words are all recorded.
The best bit was when she refused to acknowledge Aisha was 6
@@isaiah537 Aisha was not 6, she was atleast 17 to 19 actually.
@@zzsmile1
'Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of SIX YEARS of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.' Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236
*6*
Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was SIX YEARS old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death). Sahih Bukhari 7:62:64
*6*
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was SIX YEARS old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old. Sahih Muslim 8:3310
*6*
@@isaiah537doesn’t the Bible condone slavery? (Hint: It does)
@bmxney3143Yeah they're both wrong. What's your point?
I personally knoew 100% that the police don't uphold laws when it suits.
They are scared of a radicalised muslim mob, they need to be honest like Starmer. The protestors know this. The white lefty protestors want to pretend its not happening.
Of cause they don’t.If they did many politicians would be locked up an already. Along with post office officials. So your point is.
She's a liar, Burnham admitted on stage fear of racism as a reason for doing nothing. That came from his mouth directly.
you knoew?
Jimmy Savile police always pick and choose
Moral of the call : “When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging”
Well well well look who it is
How is Simon Webb these days., still stork in him...
@@vincentblack7467 At least Simon is honest unlike Sagnitya if that even is her real name
@@Jamie-uk2zh YOU SPEAK WITH A FORKED TONGUE.
@@charanjitsidhu4733 And sagnitya aswell as Khan doesnt? get off your high horse or should I say trojan horse.
Tories have a serious problem with racism and Islamaphobia
You're so right. They need to be more wary of the violent Islamic lobby.
Labour has a problem with antisemitism
So does Labour
@@notknown6605 Labour doesn't have that anymore. You're stuck in the 90s. They have a new MP's.
How so?
That didn't happen. Then she confirms it happened 😂
The Prophet said, "Isn't the witness of a women equal to half that of a man?" The women said "yes". He said "This is because of the deficiency of the women's mind." Sahih Bukhari 3:48:826
This is what happens after 40 years underinvestment in state education😂😂😂what a muppet the caller was -he had no evidence -couldn’t answer any of the question .
O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people. Quran 5:51
Get her to debate Mayhar tousi and get demolished
Excellent idea
Who?
Some gobshitevoff the internet.@@Gohka
@@Dantianblue Yes, an independent entrepreneurial journalist.
@@Dantianblue With a large listenership
Regards the Rotherham grooming scandle, this dispute can be settled by publishing a spreadsheet listing all the gromminhg offenders caught, stating their nationality / ethnicity and religion. Then if the allegations are not true, it will be plain to see. All the reports so far appear to be very wordy but completely lacking in any rogorous data.
As far as data analysis goes defining grooming gang its too broad a term. So the data wouldn’t tell you anything and data scientists probably wouldnt be agree on a definition.
Surely the best thing to do would be list the religion and race of every crime committed in the country. I’m sure this would show how they’re all done by extremists. Like remember that time when the media would tell us of that white Christian male who committed a crime…o wait🤔
You can look at crime statistics anytime you want ffs 🤦🏽♂️😂
@@whackeryounis
Hmm.... Did you miss Jimmy Savile? Or the endless reports of Catholic and Protestant priests/vicars and what they got up to?
Jersey care homes? The list goes on.
And that would be great to discuss but it still doesn't make the statement Lee Anderson made anything other than defamatory
She corrected him firmly by repeating what he said
Rochdale, Rotherham, Huddersfield, Oxford, Blackpool, Luton, Bradford etc etc etc
Those certainly are all towns in the UK
Ah yes…Oxford, that famous bastion of…rowing?
@@XAVR_ and the ones where the g rooming gangs got away with their actions.. ignorant much
@demeterontheinternet all famous for the is l am ic chuld grape gangs
@@factsdontcareaboutyourfeel7204 for someone who's TH-cam handle references "Facts" you have a very thin grasp on reality
Wasn't Cyril Smith the MP for Rochdale?
unfortunately, i knew lt's of the kids the home that he frequented,
The police knew all about him & not only did they fail to act or charge him with a crime, they actually helped cover it up.
A great Liberal.
Mr Kiddie fiddler himself……………….
There’s something that we can’t underestimate, the power of street wise, someone that sits in the office, doesn’t know what happens in the streets, something I admire when I came here were the patriotism of English people, they love their country
These people call and just rattle off their prejudices with no factual basis.
He didn’t get chance to rattle off his prejudices as soon as he started talking she shut him down with another question
@@mickgascoigne4003he listed many. she gave him many times to back up his statements, he couldn’t and when he tried she had better knowledge than him. he’s a clown.
While the callers are sometimes really hapless, I admire their courage for calling. After all, they know how often others are humiliated by Sangitha.
She plays on words and twists them so suit her. She's vile
@@anthonysmith7014 Arrogant and ignorant egos do get humiliated by that. All they know are the opinions they've been fed based on distortions of facts and cherry-picking to fit an agenda. There is truth though that both sides of political belief systems have agendas, and these two extremes have been getting used and stirred up by the media and politicians so massively via the internet that it's almost completely co-opted the whole of society into a largely manufactured drama. The internet has completely changed everything and made all the problems we already had in society about a hundred times worse than ever before. We have access to so much information constantly now that instead of everyone becoming really wise and intelligent, the vast majority of people are just being royally fooled and profoundly confused about almost everything. The endless and increasingly vapid and artless entertainment industries are pumping out vast quantities of brain "content" like never before and people are therefore able to lose themselves so much in all that, they don't have any incentive to really face life properly anyway - especially considering most folk are so bogged down working their lives away, how can you even blame them for not having anywhere near enough energy and vitality to confront and do anything about all this increasingly complex and overwhelming world?
@@anthonysmith7014100% with you. Are you Swiss?
@@dawnbrown9167 Plays on words? As in using the English language as it should be used and asking questions of the callers?
She has been trained to debate. Training that the ordinary man/woman does not have.
She isn't any more right than the caller here - just better at debating than he was.
If there's ever an unbearable presenter who doesn't represent the people of this country, then it's this lady right here.
I just love it when someone has a strong view for an argument they're not prepared to have
It’s quite easy we have an Islamist problem when you see what happening in pro Palestine marches , David Amis killed and another Tory mp threatened with homophobic and anti semetic comments he had to stand down from his role , look the other at lefty 😂
You're talking about this woman, right? She knows absolutely nothing about what happened in Rotherham 😂
So Islamism is not an issue in uk 😂😂 Sangita does get her callers selected , lobe to have an actual Debate with say Douglas Murray 😂
@@Peacefulpreface6323 I see, you interviewed the social workers involved more than she did?
@rebeccas6323 this Woman has actually interviewed the social workers that didn't report the abuse. She knows waaaaaay better than you do.
She should let the caller speak.
The caller should educate himself before speaking
Problem is, she thinks she's cleverer than she actually is...
The evidence being on film when 2 officers arrest an old man for carrying the union Jack and asked why they don't arrest some demonstrators their answer was there's more of them than us.
and the number of times that has happened and the number of years it has been happening for
A Police force with 'No Fear Or Favour' I don't believe so.
The most common saying in this country is "They are taking over".....
And it's true.
@@hunkyhaggis2161 Can you explain how it's true?
After being invited over to do jobs they cba'd doing lol. Look at the recent influx of nigerian and indian nurses. These callers no doubt love their NHS but struggle to work in it!
@@JohnnyChau-w7q It's a mathematically inevitability. Take off the blinkers.
Listening to this caller you'd think there's shariah law in London. How delusional.
If you dont want somebody to make a point,interupt and redirect.
Thank you sangita for projecting objectivity in these troubling timesand challenging the widespread misinformation and distortion of truth.
It would have been nice to actually hear the guys point of view ,I don't know why people phone these shows ,it's bordering semantics if it wasn't so serious.
They need to interrupt him and derail the discussion if he goes off-piste.
His point of view was all you heard. She was spot on. Hate and hateful comments cause problems. He had no leg to stand on.
He had no point, its pure conflation. He got ripped up lol debate jihad almost
@@essem123 so it's not a point of view to care for your culture and want what's best for it.
@@guardian100 if you defend it with misrepresentation and untruths, yes. That’s a falsehood, not a point of view
Well, clearly she is 100% biased.
What for wanting an objective explanation?
@@esm7708 for constantly cutting him off and refusing to acknowledge his valid points
@@Maynards_so_blue did you actually watch the video? There were huge pauses as he tried to verbalise his mental gymnastics.
What were his valid points? They were all deconstructed using evidence.
How about not patronising your caller and let him make his point. She never let him finish!
Anyone considering decades of police funding cuts may have something to do with poor policing. Poor politicians are leading this country by example.
They've got plenty of time to arrest people for tweets they don't agree with, so saying cuts are to blame, is naive and ridiculous.
@@ytsm you appear to be suffering from myopic memory. To suggest that they have time to arrest people for publishing adverse comments/tweets etc. is the actual naivety at play here. The ridiculousness is having to respond to such projected naiveté in the first place.
Moreover London has become Stabcity under Khan lousy leadership and the Tories has exercised zero control over UK southern border whilst LBC tells us of all the wonderful doctors, engineers etc that come in illegally. Thing is we don’t all agree with this!
knife crime has gone down under khan compared to when johnson was mayor mate. dont be a mouthpiece for lies.
London is officially 'Stabcity UK'. You may think it is wonderful and to paraphrase Bobby Brown, that's your prerogative@@thegil-martingetaway8804
I believe Birmingham has the highest rate of knife crime in England. I guess you’re still sore about Ulez.
why is she so rude? you can argue the point without being so rude.
This interviewer is nothing but a bully who takes delight in humiliation off the caller. It's easy for her when there's a team doing her research and feeding her questions to ask.
Lee Anderson speaking the truth is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIA.
Well done Lee Anderson. 👏👏👏
Bless you Sangita for your integrity
some were FRIGHTENED. Yes the ones that were supposed to be doing there job were FRIGHTENED to open their mouth because of the consequences. She should be sacked.
Yes thise involved were threaten by Mslms and their families threatened as well.I know that for a fact!
They run the local council. Half the councillors in Rochdale etc.
This woman is not fit for her job ...
This woman should be taken off air forthwith. She obviously agrees with the hold islamists have in this country and the fear intimidation and violence to our authorities that comes with it.Basically she is a fine example of what this country has become and the positions they hold , she being in one of them.
I clicked on this but didn’t watch it as the contempt LBC have for their callers is beyond belief.
t's intriguing that those who support this caller struggle with grammar. Their capability to construct strong arguments through reasoning and critical thinking is already flawed 😂
She's blind to facts it's actually happening,
Why is she given air time
Why should she not be given air time?
A smiling little vampire 🧛♀️
Sangetha humiliated this caller 😂 He regrets called in 😂
A certain teacher in batley comes to mind that had to flee for his life in a secret location, the only difference between these two are she has learned over years on how to talk over others and try to belittle, the lad just isn't articulate enough to get his point across , if she was to debate maajid nawaz she would get a lesson
Yep!... Plus the guy who held up a sign saying Hama's are terrorist and was attacked by protesters - what happened to him - oh the police moved him on and and told him to remove his sign 🤦
If she debated me she'd be sorry.She is a Mslm sympathiser.Its so obvious!
Why didn't Majid Na waz phone then?
She was brilliant In this interview. Stuttering and lying he sounded like an idiot. Without evidence you can't spread lies. She annihilated him what a tool 😂
Or Douglas Murray or Tommy Robinson…
She doesn’t let the guy talk
Are you sure? He gave him ample opportunities but he’s too thick to answer.
Gaslighter extraordinaire
It's called rebuttal sweetie,not gaslighting 😂
@@Zeus-kr4fz Not taking comments seriously from someone who resorts to emoji use for credibility
sorry not sorry...sweetie
@@nihilistlivesmattercaller had NOTHING to back there claim, sangita had a rebuttal l, that’s not gaslighting, maybe we would take u seriously if u learned what words mean
@@K0BRAH95 from someone who can't even spell 'you' or 'their'?
hilarious
British voters mimicking trump supporters utterly lead by whatever lies they want to hear that suits their argument
Im with the caller. Lee was right to call it as it is.
Because you don't like evidence?
@@DDuMas because he is right. The evidence of the behaviour he was calling out has been there for anyone that can see, to see.
@@lDolly975And what is this evidence and why hasn't everyone else "seen" it? 😕
VOTE FOR REFORM UK 🇬🇧 THE PEOPLES PARTY
This chant: "from the river to the sea" is also in the zionists chart.... look for it
Sangita… it’s pretty obvious that you are not impartial. You take the analysis of written statements over the obvious.
For instance, you can argue math and science, place words to describe and mock explanations… however, it’s pretty obvious when a square peg won’t fit into a round hole!
She’s not working for the bbc. She doesn’t have to be impartial.
The called couldn’t prove anything…Sangeeta was spot on to keep it to Islamophobia. 👍
If she kept Quiet the guy could answer.
If she kept quiet, this idiot would just have spouted more of his lies. She pointed out where he was incorrect and invited him to clarify. The fact that he was unable to back-up his arguments, tells you all you need to know about his case.
She won't let him speak and deflects his question. Did she not see what happened in Parliment.
Accusing without facts is unbecoming of a gentleman. Only the vile do that.
She shut him up what a tool he is. Stuttering trouble maker he is. No evidence no evidence just call names when you feel like. She absolutely was spot on. Urgh he is horrible imagine there are people like him living near to you.
What are you talking about? she asked the questions, let him answer it, and also she let him explain what he thinks.
The first sentence the guy said she rolled her eyes. Ignorant she will never agree with anyone that speaks the truth.😢
She wasn't interested in having a conversation here.
She had one.
@@weswheel4834 No meaningful exchange of ideas. She just wanted to talk over him.
@@czgibson3086 Tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. He tried to tell her she knew nothing, she proved otherwise. He phoned the wrong presenter If he was hoping to blind them with ‘facts’.
So many are in denial..
Why is this presenter smirking and belittling this caller.
Because he's utterly clueless and is unaware that he has no reasons for his opinions.
I"I think killer bees are bad..."
"Wait a minute honey is my special subject! "
🤣🤣 i hope to use this statement in a argument one day
Why would anyone with a sane mind, call Sangita?? This woman is very biased.
Seems that only her ideas are relevant.
Why are you here then
She is truly awful.
Have you seen LBC before? Pretty much all of their presenters have a bias (and not all in the same direction). What did she say here that was biased? It is only biased to criticise what Anderson said if you think that he represents the "centre ground".
You don't have to listen to her. There are other radio stations
No lee is right.he only spoke the truth.
His "evidence" is 'I feel like it's true, so it's true.'
I’m not a fan of Sangita’s interviewing style (regardless of the topic). Doesn’t listen to the caller’s opinion, condescends and laughs throughout. Laughing and putting your hands over your face constantly doesn’t do her or the debate any favours.
What opinion 😂😂😂😂 The guy is repeating what he saw on Facebook
@@diegolove173rightly so
She literally gives them the opportunity to talk and then asks them to provide the evidence for their opinions. That’s how proper argument work.
Your opinion on any subject should be based on whatever available facts there may be, if you can’t back up an opposing argument then it’s just something you think incorrectly.
The guy has no idea what he’s talking about and she’s just proving that by asking him the right questions and exposing his ignorance.
Lee A is just being honest .
Although both interviews and interrogations seek information, an interview is a more informal procedure, while an interrogation involves formally questioning a person who has information about an alleged crime.
Interrogatories are a discovery tool that parties can use to receive answers to specific questions about a case before trial.
This is not a debate and Mark, the radio listener, did not commit any crime.
Samgita Myska interrogated Mark, as if he were a criminal.
Of course Mark is a criminal! He is guilty of wrongthink and wrongthink cannot go unpunished.
He is a criminal..😂 criminal stutterer
It's astonishing how these ignorant people are whipped up by some politicians and these people are clueless.
He was right!
She is the cocky arrogant speaker on lbc .
Condemed the the institutions that allowed this scandal but didnt condemn the perpetrators.
Yes she did. (Why am I even responding?)
@@weswheel4834 she condemned the abuse not the abusers then she condemned the institutions that allowed it. Better not mention the demographic of the abusers eh.
@@stephenwarburton1816 You really are clutching at straws.
@@weswheel4834 ok, I've literally just re-listened to it and those are pretty much exactly what she says.
@@stephenwarburton1816 My point was that she probably didn't think she needed to explicitly condemn the abusers for obvious reasons. Do you think that everybody needs to condemn the abusers in every conversation, or only brown people?
Wow, this woman is so patronising! Let the man speak!
He is telling lies 👺👺👺
Brilliant, thank heavens for journalists like yourself who calmly and with FACTS and EVIDENCE call these nasty idiots out. Thank you
Most her facts are fiction.
What is it with LBC hosts? Argumentative, Arrogant, Condescending, Headwobblig, Looking down individuals intent only on preventing the caller from makinging their point
Many callers don't HAVE a point. Some have zero evidence and are therefore just sharing opinions with nothing whatsoever to base them on
He didn't have a point evidently
Lee Anderson is right!
Team Caller✊🏽… This interviewer is clearly unnerved by the caller,, she’s interrupting him many times and trying to make him look a fool,, but she is looking petulant and an Islamic sympathiser…. She’s pathetic😡
You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to know what she is
This is literally how men interview callers all the time. What’s the difference?
We westerners don’t have a problem criticising our own but look at her as an example, she will twist and turn every word and deny any evidence and corner a simple caller with her journalistic wisely words. Just like Baroness Warsi. She would rather be on the side of Sadiq Kahn than her own party but instead suggested Suella Braverman should leave the Tory party. What a piece of work!
"Simple caller" is right.
@@allanmckeown8417yes the man wasn’t articulate enough but it’s intuition and life experience (being from Rotherham) were making him a more honest interlocutor.
Your disregard for logic is showing. What a piece of work indeed. Almost makes one think you can only function in bad faith.
@@Uliengue sorry if you think of me this way but maybe you should also be more convincing instead of getting frustrated with the person you are debating.
@raffam3559 and no matter how many times you say it. It's not my say so. Charter. Likud. Dates. Nothing in those words are within my control
She interrupted him countless times
Can the host please stop 'gaslighting'. Allow the caller to speak.
I don't think you know what gaslighting means, it doesn't mean refuting bad arguments with facts.
@@gordonstrong5232 ha ha.
Host is a disgrace
Atleast she is talking about reality.
You know were she stands it's not the British values
And what are these "British values"? Where can I find them expressed?
@philthrelfall5294 you obviously don't know any vdont reply can't be assed with childish nonsense
@karenunsworth7973 You know the real answer is that it is undefinable, except in vague generalities, within the mind of the beholder!!
25 years ago I would never have envisaged this kind of conversation taking place. GB has changed hugely. We now have many many people who are "enriching" our culture and values with their diverse cultural, political and religious values. I have to ask myself what bit of their culture and religion has actually enhanced our way of life ?
how is this woman given airtime?
I think we can hazard a guess...
Caller you speak truth,we are 100% with you👍,sangeeta drips with condesension &constantly interrupted you & patronised you, but you are right,thankyou😊
OF COURSE ITS HAPPANING AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT NOW WOBBLE YOUR HEAD OUT OF THAT ONE
Asserting something and then putting it in capital letters does make you right. You do see that, don't you?
Lee Anderson says what most of us think.
If a cop is frightened to be accused of racism to the point it affects their ability to do their job, then surely that is fear of Islamism..
You mean Antisemitism
He's not exactly wrong though is he?
Is this woman for real
His answer to every question she put to him should've been " not yet "
When she was asking about if certain powerful people were islamists, notice she didn't mention anything about the Scottish first minister
@@ozricaurora- Which has exactly what to do with the claim that the London mayor has given control of the capital city away to Islamist Extremists?
Patronising a guy who is not articulate but who's views are valid. Poor entertainment, and bullying.
MISS KNOW IT ALL😅
I wonder why she is so biased?
Lefty+ muslim
No! There should be no muslim in authority in the UK at all!
I had friends/well more so acquaintances in the Police, and I used to listen in to some of their stories. One thing that did crop up once or twice was that if they had to go to question/arrest someone in a mostly Muslim area/street, they either went super nice "Please come out" in order not to upset the locals who often defended any of their own no matter what they were being arrested for or, they had to send extra Police to watch each others backs.
Now, I would think the same goes for any street community, but seeing as London is turning more Muslim by the day, the pure maths of it says that as the numbers grow, so does their influence/power.
Maybe stop interrupting and let people make their point…..
But if the point is obviously nonsense, better to move them on towards making a more cogent point...or to reveal their prejudices.
Bot.
He got plenty of time to try and make his point. He failed.
Is she for real? Obnoxious!
She will not let him made a a point, because of her own bias. stopped listening.
She is a charleton
I am the only journalist privy to the facts! & you're wrong!
Quite a few things wrong there
Lee Anderson was completely right. This woman’s sarcasm is only topped by her ignorance and naivety !!