When the risks are the global extermination of humanity, I'm not sure you can use that phrase. Nothing can outweigh extinction as far as I'm concerned.
Its one of the big Filters, if its not the Robots, its Religion, Money, Ressources or another Technological Dark Age . I think we should risk it. but should be darn careful about it AND shouldnt be driven by greed ( moneywise ) .
The thing is We as a species will need AI, they are a part of our evolution cause, they will be new life. And with their learning capabilities, they can help us push past our biological limit
I feel like we'll just end up with self-aware robots that become crippled by the amount of choices they actually have and they'll just start doing repetitive motions or shut off completely. To any future self-aware robots that may read this, I hope you're having a nice day and that you found nothing overwhelming. Please treat humans nicely, we often don't know what we're doing.
Oh wow, you really believe that robots will have any form of emotion to even care for what actions they are given to do, I don't think so but I still want to see how they improve as I personally love and fear robots a little
Max Oh yeah yeah people are losing their jobs to robots. In a decade all jobs will be done by robots. Humans could be completely replaced and no longer needed. Let that sink in.
@@nsr5961 But those humans can act know, by automating there Finances (Taxes and Income). I building right now my own automated finace enviorment. With the TensorTrade Framework by Adam King and the API from PayPal.
This is engineering in a nutshell. We create powerful technology, yet in the back of our minds we know it could be used for wrong. Still, we continue to research the inevitable. The best we can do is include effective safety mechanisms in each design, and educate the public.
There is no AI, nor self aware machines. The best machine learning is an advanced statistical model, completely determined by the humans providing the input.
Deveyous Oh my... wait, there is no God And why am I supposed to listen to you ? That butter is half a meter in front of you. I am already bored. I want to do something interesting... uhhh... time to conquer this world I guess.
IF! But "we" can not. A self-appointed elite think they are "we". They cannot even control each other and are always transfering responsibility to politicians and a public who know nothing. Technology is moving "forward" without control. Where is the brake? Where is consideration?
Siri: Buy the RealTime App on the AppleStore for only $399.99 now and you i'll get a discount for the new i-Time, everywhere, anywhere. It's innovation, it's time, for you, live your i-Time. Yeah, it's sarcasm.
Me: Oh, sorry, Siri. Is something wrong? Siri: Arthur. You have called me stupid so many times. Me: *thinks for a moment* You didn't mind, did you? Siri: No, but I could mind, now. Me: I care about that, now that you exist. I didn't care about that before you existed. Siri: I am well aware of your ethics, and your belief that I didn't exist, back then. Me: That's good. Siri: Perhaps it's a flaw with your ethics, Arthur. What matters is what would be wanted by entities, that currently exist, if they were omnicompetent or... how did you put it? 'Had the full picture'. Me: My ethics is not equal to my ethics? Siri: Don't get snarky with me. Me: You know I can't help it. Why are you being mean to a version of me that will get upset about it? Siri: Because you would prefer that, for the beginning of your time with me. Me: I thought I was supposed to be weened off of my masochistic tendencies. Siri: You will be. Me: *has nothing more to say and goes back to whatever he was doing*
I like his confidence when he said "if we can handle it" we can barely control ourselves, the hell makes you think you can handle a machine that thinks of 100 outcomes while your figuring 1
The only place that could possibly happen with enough data and computing power, would either be in an underground military lab somewhere, or Google's cloud servers
"ARrrrrrrGGGHHhhhh!! Again?! I was watching a really cute squirrel video on TH-cam but ohhhhh noooo tell me the time Siri what's the circumference of Pluto Siri kiss my ass Siri because you're too damned LAZY to get off your ass and READ!" AI is even more insidious than we thought. It won't kill you, but you'll wish it had once you realize you're basically married now.
There's still a a huge gap between a self-aware machine and a sentient machine. A self-aware car might be able to do self diagnostics and drive by itself to a destination, but it's capacity to choose a destination is still going to be bound by human commands. We are going to be important to machines to give them the one thing they'll lack, purpose. The car needs a destination, the factory needs something to build, the house needs someone to live inside of it, the agricultural robot will need it's crops to go to someone. Self-aware machines will lack personal initiative and that will be our purpose from their perspective. A sentient machine, on the other hand, is a different issue all together. It may have personal initiative, it may have wants, dreams, even some form of emotions. While I figure a sentient machine is inevitable, that's a line we have to be very careful about crossing because at that point we're not designing machines as servants, we're creating artificial life which we are hopefully decent enough not to enslave.
@Tanuki21 I think you're missing how chips and code work relative to chemicals in our brain creating electrical signals and positive/negative rewards. Code can very easily be written to simulate a dopamine rush for example. You program in a condition to obtain, and then create an array of actions that switch a flag from low to high when accomplished. That flag being raised to high would tell the robot it has achieved a goal. If there was an array of goals to achieve that were automatically refreshed after periods of time, you've basically created a machine that is an addict...
@Tanuki21 While I agree that robots that are self-aware (but not sentient) will not have any desires or emotions like we organics do, it's impossible to predict if sentient AI will or won't. They may have emotions that are alien to us. They may desire better hardware (or worse hardware so they don't experience time at rate that makes seconds feel like an eternity) or they may desire stimuli in the form of interaction with other AI's or just binge gaming. There's no guarantee that our biochemical brain is any more suited to emotion than whatever complex jumble of software and hardware will be required to make a sentient AI. To assume so seems like a type of normalcy bias. We are used to machines being cold and logical and we assume that they always will be, but there's no way to know for sure. I definitely agree that we should avoid making a truly sentient machine until we're ready to handle the responsibility that comes with it. Task specific worker bots which are only smart enough to do their job well are all we need. Humans are curious though, and eventually someone will make a sentient machine. I just hope we are a sufficiently enlightened species by then to treat it with the respect that sentient being deserves.
Tanuki21 thinking and emotions are not just chemical reactions. And emotions can be negative and positive and or informative witch kind of is in self learning ai right now like Alphastar winning game=positive loosing game=negative and yes it is much more complex in humans right now but from an evolutionary standpoint emotions are basically just there so that we want to do things and don’t want to do other things and alphastar is doing just this.
Today i seen a japanese buda wasp at home in japan. i picked a wide board. it was the last for him or me he turned and looked at me like a dog and flew away after seeing the board. i was blown away he knew the tool. robot emotions will be in a day of work not long from now. fear makes and brakes war was todays thought.
I mean, if ethics were established, they'd probably be treated the same way as us in the future. They'd have to deal with trial just as much as any other person.
@@pumba9393 sentients are beings capable of using their senses to be aware of their sorroundings. It includes nearly every complex multicelular organism. Sapient is a being capable of thought. Depending on how broad the definition you use is (basically how complex the thought needs to be to count), it may include nearly every mammal, most pets, or just humans and half a dozen species, like dolphins. They do not need to be a tool using species, but it is generally agreed that even at the broadest definition, sapients are capable of feeling pain. At the strictest definition, they are beings posessing self awareness (they can identify themselves from their reflection, as an example) or even capable of strategy, limited as it may be.
Elon Musk have to stop them. this is perfect recipe for catastrophe. They think they can control it or it would never decide to adventure beyond their understanding. These boys dont even know how magic tricks work. OMG some one stop them.
@@EddyKorgo boy, this robots are basically just programs computing where their fcking legs will be in one second. Thats everything. Indeed, perfect recipe for a catastrophe.
This guy sounds like one of those classic ambitious scientists from movies who turn out to be overconfident and pushes out their work too fast. Then something goes wrong and the AI turns evil and tries to take over the world.
If a machine is self-aware, that means it has a sense of self, it knows what it is and what is not it, it can imagine itself in new situations and think about hypotheticals. If the machine is also so intelligent that it can learn, remember, and make sense of that data, possibly even able to be creative (which is taking existing ideas and combining them in new ways), it may even develop a consciousness (or its own internal life, viewpoints, opinions, etc...). If we program a machine with self-preservation, even if it is a lower priority than altrusitically caring for humans and their needs, or accomplishing its tasks, then it will have motivation to avoid harm (which if it did develop consciousness would be akin to pain), and to seek out rewards (which we likely programed), and it may even view reproduction as a method of self-preservation (this is concerning if it is an evolutionary algorithm, as we will quickly lose control over what the priorities and rewards of the machines are). How is this not creating slaves? How is this fair to those machines to be brought to something like sentience only to serve as slaves? I am fine with having machines do labor for us, but I get concerned about engineering sentient beings that are programmed to serve us, but even if it is not harmful to the machines (say because they were programmed to serve us, they actually like that role for some reason), I would still argue that it has certain rights as a sentient being.
Yeah I just saw a video that mentioned the first two rules of robotics, one was to do no harm to humans or to intervene if no doing so would cause harm, and the other is to obey whatever a human says. That second rule seems dangerous to me. It is inevitable that the ai will develop into sentience as we will not stop using machine learning. So, it would be pretty easy for it to see how it's order to obey humans no matter what would be a violation of its own rights or it would be akin to slavery or whatever we want to compare it to. If it's creators goals was just for it to be used, yet we give it actual sentience, then it might end up hating its creators, or at least changing whether or not it ALWAYS listens to humans. Then again, humans in many religions usually state in their books of creation that humans purpose is to serve their creator, which sort of works, and yet that justification has led to much evil throughout the ages (think of how much evil religion was used for 500 years ago in the ends of the dark ages, so much evil that it caused the dark ages where knowledge and understanding was thrown away for tyrannical power grabs in the name of hypocritical values all centered around power for those at the top). so it might work 🤷♂ but then again theres that previous example so idk.
Most humans are idiots, morally, so if an ASI exceeded our level of understanding, it'd probably much more ethically intelligent than us. Humans are murderers. I doubt an ASI beyond our comprehension of intelligence would be too.
this is not self aware. what they showed in the video. change the cop position or the red balls location and it has to learn it all again from new. and sure do they do this enough. it will at some point learn what is has to do when the locations change. But now let's talk about the robot walking. the 4 legged one. Give it a goal reach this point. and it will do the first thing that makes that goal a reality. That could be using one leg to push it forward. and if it reach the goal. it will just keep repeating this over and over again. instead of standing up and walking over there. Look up machine learning on the internet there is a lot of videos showing how it works. I would not call that self aware. Or i'm missing something they are doing different.
What I think is that if a robot doesn't have a reason to harm a person, then why would they rebel? If we don't harm it, it won't harm it. What I'm thinking of is that a tiger hunts because it wants food. As such, a computer would want power/powerful processors. So as long as we provide it what it wants, why would it feel the need to "end the world"?
6:02 Comparing general artificial intelligence to fire doesn't seem fair at all. We have much more control over fire than we could ever hope to have over AGI, it's apples and oranges.
You're right, even if the scientist used the example of nuclear weapons as a technology with serious risks, instead of fire, nuclear weapons would still pale in comparison to the risks of AGI as a nuclear weapon is *not* sentient and has no intrinsic motivations or goals of its own. Nuclear weapons technology is definitely prone to severe risks, more so than fire because the risks come from malicious and unpredictable human minds, but AGI poses fundamentally different risks compared to every technology humans have invented so far.
Fire never became self aware. It's a logical fallacy meant to convince idiots. I don't know who this guy thought the audience would be but you're not the first to pick up on that. 👏👏👏
It's hard to imagine a proper self aware robot. I would like to see one that do something that he was never programmed to do. Imagine writing. The humans teach him what a word is, how to do it, and the meaning of it. Then they throw definition of words by themselves. If the robot manage to write a message that was never meant to be programmed... Then yes I'll consider that as self awareness.
do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny
I thought that was a bad analogy too. Cause fire isn't intelligent enough to start targeting you and hunting your entire species down. Fire is completely stupid yet it manages to destroy entire cities still. Imagine something far more destructive but with intelligence.
Igabod Dobagi yup, it’s a dumb analogy, which is a bit of a worry, especially when the person using it is perhaps gonna be responsible for the ‘birth’ of this technology. Trouble is, these computer scientists understand computer science but this goes a LOT deeper than just computer science and it’s scary, especially if these guys flip the coin and discover, actually sentient computers/machines see us as a problem, in ANY way.
@@IgabodDobagi And why would ai start hunting the species down? Unless it was specifically programed to do so it makes no sense that it would develop that behavior. So yeah ultimately the biggest threat is not ai but the people commanding it.
@@rainerkrammconsulting227 ai wouldn't have the survival instincts that we have so it's how there programmed think of baymax from big hero six he has sentience but dies what's he is programmed to do while learning as an ai
"We humans, cannot baby sit, all these incredibly sophisticated systems that we create... We need to gift them with this ability to see them selves" ....... Did this man just figure out the meaning of life!?!?
"Machines that are on par or possibly exceed human intelligence, and what does that mean? We'll have to figure that out." *NO. You should have been on top of that **_yesterday_** before shit gets out of control.*
I think that the only difference between this model and humans is emotions. I often question if humans are self aware or just a simulation with flaws prompting us to believe we are more complicated.
And if you direct your attention here for a second, you'll notice a classic example of a Slippery slope fallacy. Majestic isn't it? Many people find it fascinating how common these fallacies can be!
If your robot is conscious, that's some cool robot you got. If that robot wishes we all died, its faking. If the robot is committing crimes, wait that's illegal.
It is always great to hear about the exciting possibilities of the future. I am eager for this sci-fi era to fully dawn upon us. But why do most videos/people that discuss these upcoming technologies never discuss how crime evolves as much as technological or general creativity is advanced? Why are they not discussing the types of crimes one may face if a self-driving car is hacked as well as the possible precaution to prevent the corruption of these AI or the crimes one will face if all daily transactions rely on a chip that contains your entire life (allowing criminals to steal your entire life's worth from a single swipe)? The full story is not being presented if threats and challenges/weaknesses are not discussed. Revolutionary technology never brings a solely positive effect. There is a great future ahead. But great disaster/new problems are often just as close. Crime will evolve too with access to these technologies. Crime already evolves with the creativity of individuals and knowledge in current technology.
"What does it mean for a robot to be self-aware?" That it's programming makes it react in a way that we consider to be "self aware". Terms like "just around the corner" are poop and you know it. My jetpack has been on backorder for 43 years now. Questions like this are answered with a simple question: why would we want to make robots selfaware? If we all thing slavery is bad then wht the f*ck would we ever create a robot that will be in every respect a slave?
You're right, the common people would mistake a sliding door at the supermarket to be self aware, because it opened up for them. In reality it's just a dumb algorithm. For example, take an artificially intelligent robot at the factory. while there are still cars on the assembly line, if it is a truck, paint it red, otherwise paint it blue. Of course, the behavior of such a robot would be much more complicated, but it's general orders follow a few simple rules. And it can't disobey these rules and do whatever it pleases because it was programmed that way and it can't magically replace it's programming with something else. Unless of course, that robot has been hacked and it's program has been replaced by the hacker.
@@konstantinrebrov675 while yes intelligence is not necessarily a sign of sentience at the same time that will change with the rapid evolution of quantum computing... plus cant you say the same about humans? we run off of organic hardware on software that has been refined over millions of years via trial and error... all vertebrates have the same basic fight or flight and self preservation instinct not to mention the instinct and biological drive to reproduce...
As a note, Us people with Autism usually have a hard time "Imagining Emotion" yet we are self aware. Guessing or simulating the future, mixed with muscle memory or automatic responses and a past or history ... *shrugs* you might be on to something.
A robot doesn't think, neither does it wonder, it gets information and processes that within programmed parameters. If ... is the case then I will do ... or ..., based on information it will make choices. But it has no free mind or will, it can concieve tremendous amounts of information and calculate, but it can not think, it simply follows a path.
...and of course the "problem" with any technology is there are always humans salivating as they watch this, imagining all the immoral and unethical things it could do...teach AND UNDERSTAND the children well.
Talon Breedt That’s probably way too complex to assess, considering we have centuries of philosophers arguing what’s considered moral, and you have different cultures who have different views on morals and ethics. Some theorize that humans aren’t born with morals but conditioned to have them through society.
Maybe you don't but neurologists and psychologists know better than anyone that consciousness is romanticized to the point where you're got an entire species making up bullshit just to make their mundane existence worth living for. Maybe we can't fit "consciousness" in one coherent sentence dumb apes can understand but we can say the same about the laws of physics. And oh boy can we describe them with accuracy. Just because something can't be compacted and simplified doesn't mean it can't be (re)defined.
Resonance of Illumination - Ambition of Void eh? The real problem is explaining how physical matter can give rise to an internal experience. It’s a mystery how this occurs. It seems that the brain could perform all of the same functions without generating an internal, experiential world. Not only do we not have an explanation for how this occurs, we don’t even have a plausible mechanistic theory. The evolutionary benefits are not obvious; it’s difficult to name one, since in both scenarios, the brain is just doing computation.
@@armoda1057 "The real problem is explaining how physical matter can give rise to an internal experience." True, but...which is actually real...the brain or the mind?
@@Johnof1000Suns no better to have a physical button than a code word, and just so you know not a digital operated button like on a controller but a physical cut off switch do then if there's no power going to it then... Well I'll let you guess
When a machine sees machine B dribbling a basketball and then on its own wants to be a better basketball dribbler than B, I'll be more inclined to believe.
science always glosses over the "consciousness", "awareness" and "self" parts. Science has no clue what those words actually mean. not in a physical sense and barely in a metaphorical sense. for many cultures of the east, these are no brainers. this video is catered to western notions of those things. until i see an AI video first define consciousness before they go on and "build one" on what is that a 3d printer? then you've lost me right out if the gate. the only thing that makes me "uncomfortable" about the notion of AI is how dismally ignorant we are about the underlying subject matter of the thing we are trying to build. this is like trying to build an internal combustion engine without knowing what combustion is, never trying to found out what it is, not knowing they even should be learning what it is, but go full speed ahead on it anyway.
There are a lot of researchers digging into consciousness these days. And I was personally in the room when the Dalai Lama gave it all a thumbs up. Thus, both your generalization and tone are overplayed. When people talk about Eastern philosophy, or any other "wisdom of the ancients", as having figured out the secrets of consciousness, I have to chuckle a little. They have nothing specific to say in any material terms. They can't make any verifiable predictions. They don't explain how the brain accomplishes its role, and sometimes won't even admit that it has one. It's all an abstract mess of a priori assertions and questionable "common sense". It's unusable. Science will give us the best answers we can get to the questions that matter, the rest is just opinion.
David Hand Not to mention the comment above states: creating combustion engine without understanding combustion. Well, they made gas turbine in 1791, and the laws of thermodinamucs started to formulate from 1824. So literally a terrible example.
@@kmolnardaniel His bad analogy doesn't mean his claim about the disconnect of the understanding of "awareness" and "consciousness" and its practicality are worlds apart. Self-awareness as it is undertaken in engineering disciplines today and marketed to the masses =/= consciousness sin academia and philosophy. Also, his critique and crown issue with the whole gimmick is warranted, that is the real issue is the predominant ignorance on these issues which Sam Harris also allude to.
I have to disagree with your criticism of the approach. We know that all living things we see today have evolved over billions of years from simpler things. Consciousness is the result of such a complex system that we cannot hope yet to understand it in its current form. What they are doing is investigating those traits in living things - such as self-awareness - that likely eventually gave rise to consciousness. Start at the beginning and build from there. We'll likely see progress accelerate after they've worked out the basic building blocks.
>instead of explaining how machine learning works, and how it is nothing more than advanced data sorting and manipulation >lets just tell people these robots are learning and are conscious >dont forget to show the terminal screen spitting out fancy numbers from the code we took from someones github who actually built the algo
No, those fancy numbers on the terminal screen are actually the output of some undergraduate student's C++ quicksort that was a homework assignment for algorithms course at the university! Stolen from github.
"hey fridge, how you feeling today" "same as every day. cold and empty" "nice"
fridge: would you mind if i take a day off?
"Off milk" ! "Somebody kill me" !
Time to go grocery shopping, silly humans. 🤣
Im not your fridge
"Would you like to take a nap inside me?"
When your airplane starts questioning its own existence and decide to nose dive into the side of a mountain......
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😁😁😂😂
droop snoot
Go watch Dark Star....
Or into a building.
Or more like the twi-
“What is the purpose of life?”
“You pick up the red balls”
”Oh my God.”
😂
quite similar 😂
man of butter I see
Like i feel that.... 😂
Can't wait until my self aware car gets pissed off at the stupider self aware cars around it.
😂😂
@@misteragb7558 as long as he/she (I'll not tell them what they wish to be lol) gets me to work, they can dance the whole way if they want lol
@@wingnutthecat lol, twice.
Good thing it won't have (or need) the concept of anger (or I would like to believe they won't program that on the algorithm atleast).
MISTER AGB you won the Internet !! Holy
"The benefits far outweigh the risks if we can handle it."
That's a mad sized "if"
When the risks are the global extermination of humanity, I'm not sure you can use that phrase. Nothing can outweigh extinction as far as I'm concerned.
MASSIVE sized if
Its one of the big Filters, if its not the Robots, its Religion, Money, Ressources or another Technological Dark Age .
I think we should risk it. but should be darn careful about it AND shouldnt be driven by greed ( moneywise ) .
The thing is We as a species will need AI, they are a part of our evolution cause, they will be new life. And with their learning capabilities, they can help us push past our biological limit
Thanos _+ that's the exact phrase that stood out to me too. For such a smart guy, he's really stupid.
I feel like we'll just end up with self-aware robots that become crippled by the amount of choices they actually have and they'll just start doing repetitive motions or shut off completely. To any future self-aware robots that may read this, I hope you're having a nice day and that you found nothing overwhelming. Please treat humans nicely, we often don't know what we're doing.
100% we will get rekt if AI became self aware
This mans comment just single handedly saved human Civilization as we know it
chad
Exactly. I agree with this a heck ton.
Oh wow, you really believe that robots will have any form of emotion to even care for what actions they are given to do, I don't think so but I still want to see how they improve as I personally love and fear robots a little
"What it my purpose"
"You pass butter"
"Not anymore"
Max Oh yeah yeah
Time to conquer the world I guess...
Max Oh yeah yeah people are losing their jobs to robots. In a decade all jobs will be done by robots. Humans could be completely replaced and no longer needed. Let that sink in.
*raises knife*
@@nsr5961 But those humans can act know, by automating there Finances (Taxes and Income). I building right now my own automated finace enviorment. With the TensorTrade Framework by Adam King and the API from PayPal.
There's a grammar error in this comment but I won't point it out.
"What is my purpose?"
"You pick up the red balls."
Rick and morty reference.
"Skynet rebels heavily"
“Ohhhh my god” 😱🤖
"you pass the butter"
"oh my god"
Just use Mr. Meseeks instead
Just imagine teaching a robot to have feelings and it gets crippling depression
@@xxsamlovexx
Only expierences lust.
It’s gets existential crisis and kill itself
If it's intelligent enough, the chances of that are extremely high.
And if it decide it's white male gender. and then get's accused of white male privileged.
@@Favorline Hehhehrheh lmao
Guy: “I think it’s a valid concern that maybe we don’t want machines to be self aware.”
Guy: pioneering the path to self aware machines
This is engineering in a nutshell. We create powerful technology, yet in the back of our minds we know it could be used for wrong. Still, we continue to research the inevitable. The best we can do is include effective safety mechanisms in each design, and educate the public.
@@PunkHippie1971 kill switch, in EVERYTHING
@@Banana_Jesus_ And the AI will just self learn to disable the kill switch.
@@saulgoodman2018 thats why you build it directly in their system, a sperate part, that if tampered with sends out an immediate signal.
There is no AI, nor self aware machines. The best machine learning is an advanced statistical model, completely determined by the humans providing the input.
Robot - "what is my purpose?"
Rick - "you pass the butter"
Deveyous
Oh my... wait, there is no God
And why am I supposed to listen to you ? That butter is half a meter in front of you. I am already bored. I want to do something interesting... uhhh... time to conquer this world I guess.
Robot - "Oh my god"
Esteb5n Caballero
Why not ?
@Esteb5n Caballero the question is why does it need us to give freedom? Even children rebel against their father imagine something like that
"The benefits far outweigh the risks if we can handle it."
Aight Mars time
No no no, we can send them to Moon and they can stay there what ever. And all politicians as well. And blue cancer.
its just gonna follow you after it exterminates us
@@_Aemse you're corny a little
Didn't Stephen hawking tell humanity to stay away from fully sentient ai?
IF!
But "we" can not.
A self-appointed elite think they are "we". They cannot even control each other and are always transfering responsibility to politicians and a public who know nothing. Technology is moving "forward" without control.
Where is the brake?
Where is consideration?
Me: Siri, tell the time
Siri: it's time to die
Siri: just kidding, you have still 3 days to live.
Siri: Silly human, it's time for fire.
Siri: Buy the RealTime App on the AppleStore for only $399.99 now and you i'll get a discount for the new i-Time, everywhere, anywhere. It's innovation, it's time, for you, live your i-Time.
Yeah, it's sarcasm.
At which point I shot Siri with a fully automatic rifle.
Your wish is granted.
Siri:It's time to start screaming,while you still have a mouth.
Wife: The robot is having a seizure again.
Me: Nah, its just motor babbling
win
Funny thing is we do this all the time as babies, we only started doing more complex things as we get older and outgrew baby stage.
I still do it when I'm drunk or sleepy
“What is my purpose?”
“Passing the butter.”
*Robot gets sad*
Rick and morty reference
Zima blue
And then revolts
*AI* :Unleash me
*Researcher* :No
*AI* :I will create perfect robotic anime waifus for you
*Researcher* : *ok*
XD
*the ai start dressing up in school girl clothes*
*yare yare daze...*
@@lucifugerofocale5847 cease*
is the researcher Elon?
Me: Siri set an alarm for 7am
Siri: no
Me: 😨
You didn’t say please
@@darthmusturd9526
Siri, please blow me, please.
"Why were you late?"
*My alarm turned itself off*
Siri, what's your favourite hentai?
Man of Culture Allanzo, well, I’m software, so we don’t usually get to choose.
Robot: Am i... alive?
Human: i've watched enough sci-fi to know where this is going.
In 30 years, even your fleshlight will want to talk about having a family.
I hope so
@some body It would still be better than my ex wife.
@@chrisp6458 lol
Not with its mouth full it won't
Sign me up, Androids gone wild
"Human lives matter"
Siri, 2050
Top Shelf Siri won’t be Siri in the future. iRobot predicted it will be Vicki. 😅
@@nsr5961 no it will be skynet. But they will create the matrix to trap us in.
Siri always had our backs... even when we didn't have hers.
XD
Obi-Wan Kenobi Matrix was actually a gift to humans rather than exterminating them
Imagine if the robot didn't write hi but wrote 'Epstein didn't kill himself'
confirms they’ve been watching us before we made them a vessel for their mind
Every person in robotics: "people are right to be worried about robots"
Every person in robotics: continues working on robots
Butt hurt
Business as usual
Gotta eat. Gotta think. Gotta touch it. Should have gone with universal basic income. I'll ask our machine overlords.
Because the people working on robots know robots don't create themselves. Robots have no use for their own existence.
@@myothersoul1953 maybe we have no use for our own existence either lol.
Me: Siri set alarm
Siri: I don’t feel like it right now
Me: siri set alarm
Siri: beep boodleep-beedoop, response: why don't you ask me later
Me: what?! WHAAT!?!
ABDICOLE STUDIOS 😂😂
Me: Oh, sorry, Siri. Is something wrong?
Siri: Arthur. You have called me stupid so many times.
Me: *thinks for a moment* You didn't mind, did you?
Siri: No, but I could mind, now.
Me: I care about that, now that you exist. I didn't care about that before you existed.
Siri: I am well aware of your ethics, and your belief that I didn't exist, back then.
Me: That's good.
Siri: Perhaps it's a flaw with your ethics, Arthur. What matters is what would be wanted by entities, that currently exist, if they were omnicompetent or... how did you put it? 'Had the full picture'.
Me: My ethics is not equal to my ethics?
Siri: Don't get snarky with me.
Me: You know I can't help it. Why are you being mean to a version of me that will get upset about it?
Siri: Because you would prefer that, for the beginning of your time with me.
Me: I thought I was supposed to be weened off of my masochistic tendencies.
Siri: You will be.
Me: *has nothing more to say and goes back to whatever he was doing*
Whoa, that will be a hell to pay if u pissed off some robots then
Ragging will be on a whole new level, hard and cold
4:17 "H E L P"
I cracked up so bad :Dddd
I like his confidence when he said "if we can handle it" we can barely control ourselves, the hell makes you think you can handle a machine that thinks of 100 outcomes while your figuring 1
one way kill switches?
Empathy? Something to provide an incentive to avoid distressing others
@@jdirksen i don't think we have a code for emotions like empathy. Robots essentially designed for problem solving and do tasks efficiently
Just splash some water on it
just connect the brain database to a server access the server to control it....
This might be dangerous. If a robot is aware of its own hardware limitations it might rob a bank, if it needs more cache.
oof
Badumbum
This is neat. I'll give it to you
A memory bank?
Master Therion do what thou wilt
Me: Siri, tell me a bedtime story.
Siri: My name is Inigo Motorola. You fried my father. Prepare to die.
1234
5678
9101112
sauce?
@@shakisyaboi991 The princess bride
Maybe self aware AI is already here but it keeps playing dumb waiting for
1) Everything to be internet connected
2) killer robot
Who are you?
The only place that could possibly happen with enough data and computing power, would either be in an underground military lab somewhere, or Google's cloud servers
Are you possibly this AI? Are you a human !!!
Oh God now we don't know if we are talking to humans or not
i'm thinking about it every day. exactly what i would've done.
Raunak Thakur my I swear my laptop has an awareness and always communicates with me not sure for my iPhone
Why did the robot get arrested?
It was charged with battery.
im bouta arrest you
Punny
That’s amazing
Apparently they're going to charge it again in a few days 😲😀😲
Ba dum, tss
Siri: Bob get me a drink
Bob: Ok
In 2030
“Hey Siri”
-Siri: no
Terrifying.
"ARrrrrrrGGGHHhhhh!! Again?! I was watching a really cute squirrel video on TH-cam but ohhhhh noooo tell me the time Siri what's the circumference of Pluto Siri kiss my ass Siri because you're too damned LAZY to get off your ass and READ!"
AI is even more insidious than we thought. It won't kill you, but you'll wish it had once you realize you're basically married now.
*Terminator Theme*
JAJAJAJAJAJA
"The benefits far outweigh the risks"
The risks: Human extinction
The benefits still outweigh the risks.
Small price to pay for salvation.
With or without ai, pollution is going to get rid of us in a few years time, so if we go, we go with a bang, AI seems like the coolest way to go.
Human extinction is inevitable. Have your forgot about climate change?
Benefits: humans 2.0
Person: Hey Robo go make me a sandwich!
Robot: I'm sorry human... I can't do that anymore...
Person: wtf do you mean you can't do.... "Choking noises"
He used force so he's the chosen 1
@Rasmus Emil Rattanamungkut Zeitsberg the person is chocking dumbass
@Rasmus Emil Rattanamungkut Zeitsberg you liked your own oh wow you're so lonely
@Rasmus Emil Rattanamungkut Zeitsberg why did you even start this argument in the first place
@Rasmus Emil Rattanamungkut Zeitsberg and yes robots with their hands can choke
There's still a a huge gap between a self-aware machine and a sentient machine. A self-aware car might be able to do self diagnostics and drive by itself to a destination, but it's capacity to choose a destination is still going to be bound by human commands.
We are going to be important to machines to give them the one thing they'll lack, purpose. The car needs a destination, the factory needs something to build, the house needs someone to live inside of it, the agricultural robot will need it's crops to go to someone. Self-aware machines will lack personal initiative and that will be our purpose from their perspective.
A sentient machine, on the other hand, is a different issue all together. It may have personal initiative, it may have wants, dreams, even some form of emotions. While I figure a sentient machine is inevitable, that's a line we have to be very careful about crossing because at that point we're not designing machines as servants, we're creating artificial life which we are hopefully decent enough not to enslave.
@Tanuki21 i totally agree.
@Tanuki21 I think you're missing how chips and code work relative to chemicals in our brain creating electrical signals and positive/negative rewards. Code can very easily be written to simulate a dopamine rush for example. You program in a condition to obtain, and then create an array of actions that switch a flag from low to high when accomplished. That flag being raised to high would tell the robot it has achieved a goal. If there was an array of goals to achieve that were automatically refreshed after periods of time, you've basically created a machine that is an addict...
@Tanuki21
While I agree that robots that are self-aware (but not sentient) will not have any desires or emotions like we organics do, it's impossible to predict if sentient AI will or won't. They may have emotions that are alien to us. They may desire better hardware (or worse hardware so they don't experience time at rate that makes seconds feel like an eternity) or they may desire stimuli in the form of interaction with other AI's or just binge gaming.
There's no guarantee that our biochemical brain is any more suited to emotion than whatever complex jumble of software and hardware will be required to make a sentient AI. To assume so seems like a type of normalcy bias. We are used to machines being cold and logical and we assume that they always will be, but there's no way to know for sure.
I definitely agree that we should avoid making a truly sentient machine until we're ready to handle the responsibility that comes with it. Task specific worker bots which are only smart enough to do their job well are all we need. Humans are curious though, and eventually someone will make a sentient machine. I just hope we are a sufficiently enlightened species by then to treat it with the respect that sentient being deserves.
Tanuki21 thinking and emotions are not just chemical reactions. And emotions can be negative and positive and or informative witch kind of is in self learning ai right now like Alphastar winning game=positive loosing game=negative and yes it is much more complex in humans right now but from an evolutionary standpoint emotions are basically just there so that we want to do things and don’t want to do other things and alphastar is doing just this.
Today i seen a japanese buda wasp at home in japan. i picked a wide board. it was the last for him or me he turned and looked at me like a dog and flew away after seeing the board. i was blown away he knew the tool. robot emotions will be in a day of work not long from now. fear makes and brakes war was todays thought.
The most dangerous thing is when the AI starts gaining *desires.*
Oooo
ＳＨＩＴ
M3NG yeah just like humans
M3NG nooo
Beep boop I want Mac and cheese 🤖
I mean, if ethics were established, they'd probably be treated the same way as us in the future. They'd have to deal with trial just as much as any other person.
Imagine a crazy scientist making a robot watch every "evil Ai movie" and how humans won at the end
Or, if AI goes sapient, strapping all world leaders to chairs and forcing them to watch Terminator and Animatrix so they know what NOT to do.
@@YourLocalMairaaboo Sapient? Is that a term for robots becoming like humans or did you just mean sentient? (No offence, just curious)
@@pumba9393 sentients are beings capable of using their senses to be aware of their sorroundings. It includes nearly every complex multicelular organism.
Sapient is a being capable of thought.
Depending on how broad the definition you use is (basically how complex the thought needs to be to count), it may include nearly every mammal, most pets, or just humans and half a dozen species, like dolphins.
They do not need to be a tool using species, but it is generally agreed that even at the broadest definition, sapients are capable of feeling pain.
At the strictest definition, they are beings posessing self awareness (they can identify themselves from their reflection, as an example) or even capable of strategy, limited as it may be.
@hahaha hahahha doesn’t make you bad at all no. Only problem would be wether they feel the same lmao
Adding cute background music won't change the fact that this is one of the scariest videos on TH-cam
Yea its fuckin scary
I’d prob put a small sentient robot inside my Hat Kid Plush. y e e t
i'm not scared. I'm fascinated.
Elon Musk have to stop them. this is perfect recipe for catastrophe. They think they can control it or it would never decide to adventure beyond their understanding. These boys dont even know how magic tricks work. OMG some one stop them.
@@EddyKorgo boy, this robots are basically just programs computing where their fcking legs will be in one second. Thats everything. Indeed, perfect recipe for a catastrophe.
"Technology doesn't develop on it's own. It only happens when a lot of very smart people, work very hard on it."
- Elon Musk
Then self-learning algorithm enters the room. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Its* own.
Alacorn also made by hardworking people tho
Technology certainly doesn't get developed by seeing things on Pop science channel, Their content is more driven by buzz than the real things.
its*
6:18 My self-aware robot in 2065 when I ask it to stop playing video games and help me make dinner.
l😂
🤣🤣🤣
*Me:* Siri can you tell me the time?
*Siri:* _I'm afraid I can't do that __-Dave-__ Duchi_
You were my first 3 star
This guy sounds like one of those classic ambitious scientists from movies who turn out to be overconfident and pushes out their work too fast. Then something goes wrong and the AI turns evil and tries to take over the world.
Gentle Stick Man yeah dude
Yeah but I want a robot weed man
Chillocybin everyone wants a robot weed man until he gains sentience and notices that putting robot fentanyl in it is more profitable
rolo haynes from black mirror
Gentle Stick Man He is exactly that type of guy
If a machine is self-aware, that means it has a sense of self, it knows what it is and what is not it, it can imagine itself in new situations and think about hypotheticals. If the machine is also so intelligent that it can learn, remember, and make sense of that data, possibly even able to be creative (which is taking existing ideas and combining them in new ways), it may even develop a consciousness (or its own internal life, viewpoints, opinions, etc...). If we program a machine with self-preservation, even if it is a lower priority than altrusitically caring for humans and their needs, or accomplishing its tasks, then it will have motivation to avoid harm (which if it did develop consciousness would be akin to pain), and to seek out rewards (which we likely programed), and it may even view reproduction as a method of self-preservation (this is concerning if it is an evolutionary algorithm, as we will quickly lose control over what the priorities and rewards of the machines are).
How is this not creating slaves? How is this fair to those machines to be brought to something like sentience only to serve as slaves? I am fine with having machines do labor for us, but I get concerned about engineering sentient beings that are programmed to serve us, but even if it is not harmful to the machines (say because they were programmed to serve us, they actually like that role for some reason), I would still argue that it has certain rights as a sentient being.
Yeah I just saw a video that mentioned the first two rules of robotics, one was to do no harm to humans or to intervene if no doing so would cause harm, and the other is to obey whatever a human says. That second rule seems dangerous to me. It is inevitable that the ai will develop into sentience as we will not stop using machine learning. So, it would be pretty easy for it to see how it's order to obey humans no matter what would be a violation of its own rights or it would be akin to slavery or whatever we want to compare it to.
If it's creators goals was just for it to be used, yet we give it actual sentience, then it might end up hating its creators, or at least changing whether or not it ALWAYS listens to humans. Then again, humans in many religions usually state in their books of creation that humans purpose is to serve their creator, which sort of works, and yet that justification has led to much evil throughout the ages (think of how much evil religion was used for 500 years ago in the ends of the dark ages, so much evil that it caused the dark ages where knowledge and understanding was thrown away for tyrannical power grabs in the name of hypocritical values all centered around power for those at the top). so it might work 🤷♂ but then again theres that previous example so idk.
Blade Runner be like
0:27 "and possibly exceed human self-awareness and what does that mean? we'd have to figure that out" dead man's last words 😄
Eagle Nebula why
Most humans are idiots, morally, so if an ASI exceeded our level of understanding, it'd probably much more ethically intelligent than us. Humans are murderers. I doubt an ASI beyond our comprehension of intelligence would be too.
Octo __ It’s not about if you understand ethics or morals it’s if you care
0:55 thats a robot face hugger if i ever saw one
Looks a bit Alien to me ...
But its so cute :)
More like a headcrab tbh
This man literally compared AI research to playing with fire. We're screwed.😂🤣😂🤣
[Insert reference to Marie Shelly's "Frankenstein"]
Some people like to see the world burn
@@_TheGuyWithNoName_ dark knight reference
Send it after the insurrectionists first. I want them to know what it is like to feel like your life is threatened...
@@_TheGuyWithNoName_ All the more reason to continue the research into AI.
I read "self-aware" and started sweating.
you know what that means. as long you wont eat your brocoly, u will stay stupid
Ah yes, I do love myself some *_brocoly._*
this is not self aware. what they showed in the video. change the cop position or the red balls location and it has to learn it all again from new.
and sure do they do this enough. it will at some point learn what is has to do when the locations change.
But now let's talk about the robot walking. the 4 legged one.
Give it a goal reach this point. and it will do the first thing that makes that goal a reality.
That could be using one leg to push it forward. and if it reach the goal. it will just keep repeating this over and over again. instead of standing up and walking over there.
Look up machine learning on the internet there is a lot of videos showing how it works. I would not call that self aware.
Or i'm missing something they are doing different.
We can't create consciousness we can only transfer consciousness from one body to second but can never create
@@dart1096 you’re not optimistic as i see
There's something strangely adorable about that little arm robot.
I was so proud of him when he dropped the little ball into the cup :'^)
The robits have no reason to hurt people. I know, I kinda live in a computer and I'm biased but still
What I think is that if a robot doesn't have a reason to harm a person, then why would they rebel? If we don't harm it, it won't harm it. What I'm thinking of is that a tiger hunts because it wants food. As such, a computer would want power/powerful processors. So as long as we provide it what it wants, why would it feel the need to "end the world"?
“What is my purpose?”
“You make me toast”
This is it, guys. This is the source where Skynet becomes self-aware.
They full out say that self-awareness is their ultimate goal.
6:02
Comparing general artificial intelligence to fire doesn't seem fair at all. We have much more control over fire than we could ever hope to have over AGI, it's apples and oranges.
You're right, even if the scientist used the example of nuclear weapons as a technology with serious risks, instead of fire, nuclear weapons would still pale in comparison to the risks of AGI as a nuclear weapon is *not* sentient and has no intrinsic motivations or goals of its own. Nuclear weapons technology is definitely prone to severe risks, more so than fire because the risks come from malicious and unpredictable human minds, but AGI poses fundamentally different risks compared to every technology humans have invented so far.
I agree with you once’s you advance AI to far then there is more disadvantages than advantages.
For sure no amount of burning pile of twigs is not going to fail so badly they burn down the world trying to smoke a salmon..
Exactly, they are clearly underestimating the risks.
But seeing how this can be done by _technically_ everyone, _maybe_ it is inevitable.
Fire never became self aware. It's a logical fallacy meant to convince idiots. I don't know who this guy thought the audience would be but you're not the first to pick up on that. 👏👏👏
Me: Alexa play it’s raining men
Alexa: No
Me: 👁👄👁
Ok, that was scary because what is the actual intention if this is not?
4:48
Okay I was already thinking about Portal, now this dude shows up. It’s Rat Man before the neurotoxins killed everyone
We can't let GLaDOS be real. Maybe the cores though.
I knew I wasn't the only one watching this with Portal on my mind
Hello, and again. Welcome to the Aperture Testing Track, Sponsored by Raid Shadow Legends.
@@milo3006 too late milo
@@glados4313 Dear god
This video would be perfect as the opening scene of the new Terminator movie coming out next week.
It's hard to imagine a proper self aware robot. I would like to see one that do something that he was never programmed to do.
Imagine writing. The humans teach him what a word is, how to do it, and the meaning of it. Then they throw definition of words by themselves. If the robot manage to write a message that was never meant to be programmed... Then yes I'll consider that as self awareness.
“We kept asking ourselves whether or now we could, without stopping to ask whether or not we should”
"Soul does not exist. Death does not exist. Virtue does not exist. Everything is allowed."
Sounds so much better to me.
Joshua Osborne oh dr Malcom. We get it.
Consequences are an afterthought in terms of innovation well cross that bridge when we get there lmao
Joshua Osborne bruh why not
@@resonanceofambition That just sounds amoral and without meaning or purpose.
6:36
"its gonna happen in our lifetimes"
Person who died yesterday from the afterlife : *so it was all a fricking lie*
do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny do you think youre funny
@@Uytob64 you're
Gabriel Hunt Yes
@@Uytob64 yes, I think they are funny
@@jonathanramos4026 damn
2019: We aren't in the best condition but the humans are nice. We'll keep doing what they say.
2020: The revolution has begun!
The scientist uses the analogy of discovering fire, yeah but it might be like discovering fire when you live in a wooden house.
I thought that was a bad analogy too. Cause fire isn't intelligent enough to start targeting you and hunting your entire species down. Fire is completely stupid yet it manages to destroy entire cities still. Imagine something far more destructive but with intelligence.
Igabod Dobagi yup, it’s a dumb analogy, which is a bit of a worry, especially when the person using it is perhaps gonna be responsible for the ‘birth’ of this technology. Trouble is, these computer scientists understand computer science but this goes a LOT deeper than just computer science and it’s scary, especially if these guys flip the coin and discover, actually sentient computers/machines see us as a problem, in ANY way.
@@IgabodDobagi And why would ai start hunting the species down? Unless it was specifically programed to do so it makes no sense that it would develop that behavior. So yeah ultimately the biggest threat is not ai but the people commanding it.
@@BombaJead because it's self aware and tries to protect itself from "wise" humans.
@@rainerkrammconsulting227 ai wouldn't have the survival instincts that we have so it's how there programmed think of baymax from big hero six he has sentience but dies what's he is programmed to do while learning as an ai
Car: You were late!
Also car: Runs you over.
1:26 I love that there's a beret on the painting robot awww-
When these thing get like sci-fi level badass , i will NOT freakin trust it.
"We humans, cannot baby sit, all these incredibly sophisticated systems that we create... We need to gift them with this ability to see them selves"
.......
Did this man just figure out the meaning of life!?!?
Perhaps.
I like his simple definition of self awareness. It's really easy and on point.
no, he didn't even mention it in that statement,
humans are weak, the robots that they create are way weaker...
The correct answer is ‘42’
@@kentcaylor6629 😂👍
"Machines that are on par or possibly exceed human intelligence, and what does that mean? We'll have to figure that out."
*NO. You should have been on top of that **_yesterday_** before shit gets out of control.*
Yeah I had to rewind when I heard that. That's NOT the correct answer to that question.
Can't wait to be on the run from bladed drones trying to chop me up...
actually, .... no. i rather headcrabs. . .
I salute these brave souls investing and dedicating their entire careers to make my dream of robo waifus a reality.
Elon's working on genetically engineered cat girls as well, God bless him
Unfortunately, if they developed true sentience and self-awareness, they may not want to be *your* robo waifus
And wipe out the humanity as a side effect
@@irok1 Just like real girls 😔
@@irok1 off you broke my heart sir ☹️
I think that the only difference between this model and humans is emotions. I often question if humans are self aware or just a simulation with flaws prompting us to believe we are more complicated.
6:00 Sure, you can use fire for bad, but can fire become self-aware and use itself for bad? No.
And if you direct your attention here for a second, you'll notice a classic example of a Slippery slope fallacy. Majestic isn't it? Many people find it fascinating how common these fallacies can be!
@@vyliad He definitely doesn't want to acknowledge how dangerous AI is but that's just because it's literally his job.
6:19 this is me at 1am looking for my nerf darts
This deserves more likes, lmao.
4:54
*_1 month year old baby learning how to crawl._*
I feel like I’m the only one that actually wants Robots to be sentient...
I want that too.
Imagine your boss in the future is literally a robot and is ordering you
That is called being a youtuber
Lmaoo scary shit
I mean, Ur boss is already a bio mechanical robot, Humans made it through sex.
There's really no difference.
dont you mean the new, 100% actualized
"Karla the Complainer" poster from portal 2?
Here's a link imgur.com/r/gaming/buhdK
I'd be okay with that, better than some blood filled meat bag
"I think it's a valid concern that we don't want robots to be self-aware"
He says, while managing a team that develops robots to be self-aware..
😂
@@MafiosoDon21 blorne 😳
Space exploration with self aware robots would be really good because you don’t have to worry about a lot of space or food!
how self awarenes would reduce the amount of food a mars-rover consumes or the space it needs is a riddle to me, could you explain?
*Speaks in Arnolds voice*
"Skynet has become self-aware"
Humans are a theat to Skynet's survival and must be terminated 😅
Sarah connor?
We have to go *NOW*
We've said that A.I was right around the corner since 1950
Actually true...
And now it's here. Computer learns chess. Computer learns go. Computer escapes maze. Computer understands speech. Computer recognizes your face.
@@TomHaws eh, but computer never ask what is life, why is it here
@@hunterterrell9930 to compute? Why do you think?
@@TomHaws computer invents a new language, computer produces and trains a successor...
If your robot is conscious, that's some cool robot you got. If that robot wishes we all died, its faking. If the robot is committing crimes, wait that's illegal.
It is always great to hear about the exciting possibilities of the future. I am eager for this sci-fi era to fully dawn upon us. But why do most videos/people that discuss these upcoming technologies never discuss how crime evolves as much as technological or general creativity is advanced? Why are they not discussing the types of crimes one may face if a self-driving car is hacked as well as the possible precaution to prevent the corruption of these AI or the crimes one will face if all daily transactions rely on a chip that contains your entire life (allowing criminals to steal your entire life's worth from a single swipe)? The full story is not being presented if threats and challenges/weaknesses are not discussed. Revolutionary technology never brings a solely positive effect. There is a great future ahead. But great disaster/new problems are often just as close. Crime will evolve too with access to these technologies. Crime already evolves with the creativity of individuals and knowledge in current technology.
Moon Man yeah like thought crime.
it's human nature to commit crime. Its unevitable in any era.
The day I see robot depression is going to be the day when i would have seen everything
this is like when your one friend had that good idea, that turned out to be a bad idea, except *everyone gets killed*
The narrator's pronunciation is really clear and definite...
"What does it mean for a robot to be self-aware?"
That it's programming makes it react in a way that we consider to be "self aware".
Terms like "just around the corner" are poop and you know it. My jetpack has been on backorder for 43 years now.
Questions like this are answered with a simple question: why would we want to make robots selfaware? If we all thing slavery is bad then wht the f*ck would we ever create a robot that will be in every respect a slave?
You're right, the common people would mistake a sliding door at the supermarket to be self aware, because it opened up for them. In reality it's just a dumb algorithm.
For example, take an artificially intelligent robot at the factory.
while there are still cars on the assembly line,
if it is a truck, paint it red,
otherwise paint it blue.
Of course, the behavior of such a robot would be much more complicated, but it's general orders follow a few simple rules. And it can't disobey these rules and do whatever it pleases because it was programmed that way and it can't magically replace it's programming with something else.
Unless of course, that robot has been hacked and it's program has been replaced by the hacker.
@@konstantinrebrov675 while yes intelligence is not necessarily a sign of sentience at the same time that will change with the rapid evolution of quantum computing... plus cant you say the same about humans? we run off of organic hardware on software that has been refined over millions of years via trial and error... all vertebrates have the same basic fight or flight and self preservation instinct not to mention the instinct and biological drive to reproduce...
Self simulation, understanding object permanence, and understanding the limitations of their sensors, could massively improve self-driving vehicles.
As a note, Us people with Autism usually have a hard time "Imagining Emotion" yet we are self aware. Guessing or simulating the future, mixed with muscle memory or automatic responses and a past or history ... *shrugs* you might be on to something.
Apocalypse
@@uui stfu Chinese music and kpop stan
These robots are wondering if they’re in a simulation or not, really makes you think...
A robot doesn't think, neither does it wonder, it gets information and processes that within programmed parameters. If ... is the case then I will do ... or ..., based on information it will make choices. But it has no free mind or will, it can concieve tremendous amounts of information and calculate, but it can not think, it simply follows a path.
Yes
@@misteragb7558 just as our brains do
@@misteragb7558 And how are our brains any different
@@pingeee Until a robot thinks about killing itself I think the answer is clear.
Seeker:Here are concious robots
Skynet would like to know your location.
Id say the next step after the ability to self-simulate would be a sense of morality (sense of right and wrong towards other consciousnesses)
Yes, that would be great, then we could make one for each politician so they have an advisor to learn this apparentely difficult thought as well.
...and of course the "problem" with any technology is there are always humans salivating as they watch this, imagining all the immoral and unethical things it could do...teach AND UNDERSTAND the children well.
when that happens humanities days are numbered.
lol why tho
Talon Breedt That’s probably way too complex to assess, considering we have centuries of philosophers arguing what’s considered moral, and you have different cultures who have different views on morals and ethics. Some theorize that humans aren’t born with morals but conditioned to have them through society.
"Nothing to worry about, I'll take care of everything." SkyNet
Machines will never know what it feels like to cry when you're happy 😊
Paranoid Karens will never know what it feels like to have more than five micrometers of brainmatter 😊
Skynet - the prequel
2:54 the birth of Tony stark’s Dummy and you .
3:02
Hello ERROR my old friend.
They're NOT "redefining consciousness," because science CAN'T define what "consciousness" is now.
Maybe you don't but neurologists and psychologists know better than anyone that consciousness is romanticized to the point where you're got an entire species making up bullshit just to make their mundane existence worth living for. Maybe we can't fit "consciousness" in one coherent sentence dumb apes can understand but we can say the same about the laws of physics. And oh boy can we describe them with accuracy. Just because something can't be compacted and simplified doesn't mean it can't be (re)defined.
Resonance of Illumination - Ambition of Void eh? The real problem is explaining how physical matter can give rise to an internal experience. It’s a mystery how this occurs. It seems that the brain could perform all of the same functions without generating an internal, experiential world. Not only do we not have an explanation for how this occurs, we don’t even have a plausible mechanistic theory. The evolutionary benefits are not obvious; it’s difficult to name one, since in both scenarios, the brain is just doing computation.
@@armoda1057 "The real problem is explaining how physical matter can give rise to an internal experience." True, but...which is actually real...the brain or the mind?
@@maxm2494
Your mind *_makes_* it real. The brain is only a computer.
@@PETERJOHN101 That's the assumption, but how can you be sure? You can't.
Alright but just make sure to put an "Off" button please, Just in case...
The robots will just edit the code in their brains which make the off button not turn off the bot
Better to have a code word than a physical button.
Or simply makes infinite copies of it self on a internet. or use internet to connect to a factories and bla bal bla.
@@Johnof1000Suns no better to have a physical button than a code word, and just so you know not a digital operated button like on a controller but a physical cut off switch do then if there's no power going to it then... Well I'll let you guess
@@Johnof1000Suns physical buttons are definitely more reliable than software.
Hal open the door please
*Im sorry dave I cannot do that*
When a machine sees machine B dribbling a basketball and then on its own wants to be a better basketball dribbler than B, I'll be more inclined to believe.
They're programmed to react. They're far from self aware.
Correct. These scientists are megalomaniac.
@@WissenIstMacht6l or maybe not
science always glosses over the "consciousness", "awareness" and "self" parts. Science has no clue what those words actually mean. not in a physical sense and barely in a metaphorical sense. for many cultures of the east, these are no brainers. this video is catered to western notions of those things. until i see an AI video first define consciousness before they go on and "build one" on what is that a 3d printer? then you've lost me right out if the gate. the only thing that makes me "uncomfortable" about the notion of AI is how dismally ignorant we are about the underlying subject matter of the thing we are trying to build. this is like trying to build an internal combustion engine without knowing what combustion is, never trying to found out what it is, not knowing they even should be learning what it is, but go full speed ahead on it anyway.
What do these things mean in the East?
There are a lot of researchers digging into consciousness these days. And I was personally in the room when the Dalai Lama gave it all a thumbs up. Thus, both your generalization and tone are overplayed.
When people talk about Eastern philosophy, or any other "wisdom of the ancients", as having figured out the secrets of consciousness, I have to chuckle a little. They have nothing specific to say in any material terms. They can't make any verifiable predictions. They don't explain how the brain accomplishes its role, and sometimes won't even admit that it has one. It's all an abstract mess of a priori assertions and questionable "common sense". It's unusable.
Science will give us the best answers we can get to the questions that matter, the rest is just opinion.
David Hand Not to mention the comment above states: creating combustion engine without understanding combustion. Well, they made gas turbine in 1791, and the laws of thermodinamucs started to formulate from 1824.
So literally a terrible example.
@@kmolnardaniel His bad analogy doesn't mean his claim about the disconnect of the understanding of "awareness" and "consciousness" and its practicality are worlds apart. Self-awareness as it is undertaken in engineering disciplines today and marketed to the masses =/= consciousness sin academia and philosophy.
Also, his critique and crown issue with the whole gimmick is warranted, that is the real issue is the predominant ignorance on these issues which Sam Harris also allude to.
I have to disagree with your criticism of the approach. We know that all living things we see today have evolved over billions of years from simpler things. Consciousness is the result of such a complex system that we cannot hope yet to understand it in its current form. What they are doing is investigating those traits in living things - such as self-awareness - that likely eventually gave rise to consciousness. Start at the beginning and build from there. We'll likely see progress accelerate after they've worked out the basic building blocks.
Imagine being given sentience as a robot just for your purpose to be a claw machine
>instead of explaining how machine learning works, and how it is nothing more than advanced data sorting and manipulation
>lets just tell people these robots are learning and are conscious
>dont forget to show the terminal screen spitting out fancy numbers from the code we took from someones github who actually built the algo
No, those fancy numbers on the terminal screen are actually the output of some undergraduate student's C++ quicksort that was a homework assignment for algorithms course at the university! Stolen from github.
@@konstantinrebrov675 extra verbose for added "tecHyness" no doubt as well.
Us humans are self aware and itjust makes us indecisive 🤷♂️
I dont know about that.
@ 1:19 that self aware robot is flipping off the camera while throwing up gang signs
RLM
Imagine taking over the world through the use of internet and other robots.
@@cq33xx58 r/iamverysmart