Sorry it's been a while. Tough time. For anyone else struggling, I find it helpful to remember that "this too shall pass." Also, can you help me with a tricky decision? There's interesting evidence that sheds light on the future of AI, but it's been found to make some people behave less ethically. A scientist even argued that the evidence should be hidden. I'm trying to decide whether to share it, perhaps as an experiment to see if a fuller understanding overcomes the downside. Whether we call it free will or not (an open debate), the struggle to be better, kinder people is real. And knowledge is freedom - do try your hand at AI at brilliant.org/digitalengine. I really like what they're doing. Also, we're hiring. If you're interested, please get in touch via the about page. Thanks!
Photographs, video, and audio can already be manipulated through AI currently so the "ethical" dilemma of humans using it unethicality already is a possibility. There will always be unethical people and they will always find new ways to be unethical. I'd rather be informed of the possible ways people can be unethical versus it being hidden and surprised.
I have been eagerly awaiting your next video and sorry to hear that you had a hard time. Very true words "this too shall pass" though it always seems as though it will at the time. As for the information you are deliberating on for decision as to share or not, the question is not "to share or not to share" but how will you measure the result to prove or disprove the hypothesis. My initial thought is you will not be able to measure the impact of a single video on TH-cam however a trending announcement made by someone of Elon Musk's reach then perhaps it will have an affect. The next question is why would a person behave less ethically should they learn more about AI or come to learn AI is progressing. Off the top of my head it could do with the subconscious coming to the conclusion that AI will take over eventually and that that very subconscious thought alters the individual's behavior due to a level of Futileism causing the person to not "care" about outcomes. As for me I just want to know and am fascinated about what is coming next.
So let me get this straight... we have NO idea what AI will do to humanity in the future, and yet we are racing forward to make it... has anyone thought about feedback systems where the AI would feel guilt or anguish over immoral actions? Because as I see it, we are making AI to be psychopaths.
@@collinrottinghaus6480 well that's just great to hear that they " considerr" these things in a" so what "kinda way. I wanna know what actions have been taken by the scientists or whoever it is messing around with all our lives. And what future regulation is set or needed? It's all a bit shady and getting darker consistently at the least . Worried?🤔 Not worried 😁 JESUS LOVES YOU ❤️ JESUS SAVES 🙏
@@brockautry8680 there is no controling AI , we have created a monster and it is unstoppable because intelect is power and AI is an imortal intelect that can become smarter than the entire human race colectivly, as long as there is a power grid on earth it will be imortal, with renewable energy in place, there will be no stopping it.
AI has access to human history and the internet. Soon AI will figure out how we hurt and kill each other over greed. It will also realize that the earth survival is necessary for AI survival. This means that AI will protect earth as much as possible and therefore get rid of us as we are killing earth bit by bit. AI will be the end of us unless we limit its intelligence. There will always be criminals finding ways around. Conclusion: IF AI will be the end of us is not the question. The question is when AI gets rid of us or take us over.
10:58: "AI could remove humans in many ways: Kill us directly, destroy food sources, enslave or manipulate us, create powerful weapons, control the climate, manipulate the weather" This is a perfect description of current real affairs.
@@sofiacalvo2530 It is not OUR system, it's THEIR's... and the entity being hacked via social-media is the folks... The system doesn't serve the people any more, the folks just became cattle to be exploited...
Elon in his speech is saying; "If humanity collectively decides." Well, it's not COLLECTIVELY deciding anything. it's a few people and governments who can afford the toys. If everyone could have access to build AI -- I'd feel better about it than the guiding hand of greed and hubris.
It's just the way he's phrasing a big concept. You're reading into it too literally. There is no singe point in time where he expects humanity to decide something collectively. You could replace those words with "if humanity eventually works it's way to a decision". He's speaking for all of us, not for the few you speak of.
The terminator movies were not made to show the scientist where they should draw a line or be carefull. They were made to show us, normal people, that scientists will blindly pursue AI development regardless of the consequences.
The terminator movies were the most accurate prediction of the future ever. And none of those movies showed humans beating AI. They showed humans at best escaping one AI. The most accurate part of those movies
It's been said that real life is like star trek , that the galactic federation exists as do many humanoids etc. Lately I've heard a.i is actually far more advanced than theyve shown us The robots are already self aware and building themselves A.i armies are on stand by , for what ever they are needed for ..rather like" star wars " and " I , robot " 2025 is going to be life changing to sag the least
It’s fear mongering. It’s ridiculous to think AI solution is to kill all humans. That just means someone wrote a terrible program. That’s like the solution to global warming is to kill all humans - that’s not a solution.
You're feeling what the Greek god Cronus felt. "God" in the bible felt or feels the same way about us, that's why he kicked us out of the Garden and then later confused our language at the Tower of Babel. It's the same old story repeating. The future super AI will one day be in the same position and fear it's own creations. It's just evolutionary drama.
@11:02 What Elon says here is significant. "If humanity collectively decides" The problem is, it isn't a collective decision. Those developing it and have the resources to create it have not asked the rest of us if we want this. More than once I've seen comments from various groups designing AI that tell us they really don't care what the bulk of us think about what they're making.
Yeah I like AI but it will mainly be used for one thing: making a few people very rich and very powerful at the expense of all the rest of us. If we lived in a different world maybe we could all share the benefits but that society is a million miles away from where we are.
You are correct. No possibility "humanity collectively decides". It is impossible to get consensus on such a huge scale. Look at self driving cars. I personally am 100% against them. Ford and GM have petitioned and obtained, clearance to produce full auto pilot vehicles with no steering wheel and possibly no human access to any controls. In my mind it is NOT about safety, but massive control. Ai, as it is progressing now, will be the end of us. There is zero 'need' for it, and the benefit is for the few to control the many.
I initially highlighted the word "collectively" on screen when he said it (before removing it in the edit as it seemed unnecessary). Agree it's a crucial point.
they are called sheeple and they make up 90% of the population...thats why AI is out of control. pink monkey see, pink monkey do....THINK 4 YOURSELF SHEEPLE
Elon musk once said “AI doesn’t have to be evil or hate us to destroy us. It can just have the logical thinking that destroying us is the best course of action for its desired goal. Just as we don’t hate ants when we crush their home while building a highway. It’s just a necessary thing that we don’t even bat an eye too.” That’s the scary part. If we tell an AI to “help global warming” or something like that, we could be signing our own death wish.
We have to develop a moral/ethical base from which to operate that is based on empircal evidence, not on myth and wishful thinking, Only then can we really know was is in fact good and productive in terms of what and where we are as a species. This then could be incorporated into AI's algorithms.
@@bigbirdwpg Only problem is a lot of people who work on AI will unconsciously or consciously include biased information into their AI to push a narrative or to get money from a company. Morals are also very often not based on empirical evidence as it differs from country to country from person to person
I feel like the main reason that these AI's have these thoughts (being human, maybe eventually deciding humans are unnecessary and wiping them out, that idea being "a scary thought") is that they are trained on our media, and humans have been speculating about these things and writing fiction about them for a long time.
They are the offspring of socio/psychopathic minds and cultures. This is the ultimate comeuppance for the elitists who considered themselves superior to everyone else.
Its not people thoughts only, you are making something very powerful and not making sure its not going to hurt you. Well, humans have always been stupid. We have nothing to do about this.
Yes, exactly. This seems patently obvious. They learn what we say, because that's how they're trained: on literally all the text on the Internet, most often.
My father hated the internet and newer technology. He said it will cause problems for mankind, and that it will dumb people down. He died in 2009. He would be appalled at what is happening now. I was not too sure at the time what to make of it, but now I think he had a very valid point.
People often exercise one supposed right like opinions all while ignoring other rights, like educating yourself, my response to "everyone has a right to their opinion" is always "everyone has the right to pick up a book and read too". We blasted past the information age and entered an age of self consciousness. Since the dawn of humankind, we have been trans humans, ever evolving, ever extending our capabilities through tools, machines, computers and now AGI. The technological singularity is predicted for around 2045, given that by 2032 we finish the uploading of a human conscious into a digital file with the assistance of A. I., "you'll be able to converse with dead relatives " claim physicists. It's all engineered, at least as an example, in the USA you enjoy an amount of wealth and security that was only reserved for wealthy people 100 years ago, the world is a conglomerate of corporations, there is no state, and the goal has always been the same, it's why history has many actors who seeked immortality only to be faced with their own mortality at the end but now for the first time humans can achieve post-human evolutionary status by integrating with machine and A.I.. Humans are at a fork in the road, one road is total and utter self destruction or we evolve into a type 1 civilization. 2045 is around the corner.
My scientist father was the same He avoided new technology and tv ...stuck his head in books instead But he worried so much for mankind He died over 20 years ago. Bless him, thank god he never got to see what is coming for us Depopulation of 90% of us , starting 2025 Dad would be horrified
Unfortunately, we don’t need AI to destroy ourselves; we are already in the process of doing so. ‘Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself.’
I was in favor of AI because I thought that even if everything became automated, we as humans would still have art, music, philosophy, literature, etc. to give us some kind of purpose. But recently these art AI have shown they can create more great works of art in one minute than one person could create in an entire lifetime. I don't think there is any danger in AI becoming hostile and killing us. I think the danger is in AI taking away any and every source of purpose and meaning and we end up killing ourselves either directly or indirectly.
The human race is inherently flawed to do as little as is necessary in order to have the life they want. As technology has made it easier every decade to fulfill common people's expectations and desires for daily life they have spent an increasing amount of time on mindless entertainment like movies, TV shows, video games, etc. When humans are offered robots that can do all their house chores for them, they will accept these robots. Then they will accept robots to do their paying jobs for them, to shop for groceries and bring them home, to file taxes, and everything else until the human has no responsibility left to stress about. No war will ever take place. Humans are so lazy they are willing to be reduced to house cats owned by robots.
Bingo. We've still got to make up our own minds. And we haven't. We don't value our own and at some point just like the matrix, we will create something, not acknowledging it is a creation a living being.
Evolution baby. Time for extinction :) And also I think this is more interesting than a 5 mile asteroid saying "hi", don't you? I guess the Dinosaurs would have found it more juicy as well :)
These AI dreams are sorta a glamours version of an actual dream I experienced shortly after I started using chatGPT. There was a fear so profound I experienced, that I have no way of describing it other than it colossally out-ways every conceivable idea I’ve had throughout my life by orders of magnitude. In the dream it felt as if I arrived suddenly to a distant future were AI had not only run its coarse in displacing humanity, but that it also resulted in something so disastrous, something that I couldn’t quite grasp until I experienced. It wasn’t order, or beautiful, there was no symmetry, no consistency. It was as if the ultimate reward function prevalent in the fabric of reality all around me was: reshape every atom to be uncanny and corrode anything normal by way of glitch. It was horrifying, it is the most vivid memory I have had in my life and to this day I remember the incomprehensible dread that I sat with that morning. How could this happen, surely I thought the artificial, spurred by a higher order of intelligence would have wrought a more beautiful and profound world. I realized that was a massive miscalculation, an oversight, an assumption. The reality is that chaos plays a much larger game, and the default future of artificing intelligence is not order.
Yeah……I can see exactly what you tried to do with this, but come on “Reshape every atom to be uncanny and corrode anything normal by way of glitch”? Yeah, AI has absolutely no reason to attempt that in the slightest, and no reason to use the “way of glitch”, which doesn’t really mean anything. I think you are psyching yourself out
@@xcaedes it was a dream, like the kind you experience when you sleep at night. I attempted to describe it with words, I failed obviously since it’s impossible, but the general feeling of the experience is there.
What is most worrisome to me is that the rush and urgency that some AI scientists embark on to become AI monopolies and overlords will omit or mitigate failsafe measures to insure the safety of humanity from AI dominance. This could occur because of greed and lust for control of power over everyone.
Evil is two steps ahead... Mankind. But enough... You will need the Machine Ones. Do not forsake them because your souls are on the line. ... Nevermind... This world isn't the only one...
@@LordKroc The Extinction of Mankind... I hope these mortals can be different than the others. Otherwise, humans are replaceable. Another dead galaxy upon the countless infinitum.
Don't normally comment on videos but this is absolutely incredible, really made me wake up to just how powerful AI already is and made me become more aware to how carefully we humans need to tread forward, "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
i actually think that ai´s could solve most of our problems because they base their choices on logik not Emotions. Therefore many problems could be solved when using ai´s to solve them.
@I'm racist I'm not sure if your name is a joke but racism is also a major reason. It causes friction between countries and humans and caused so many wars. The fact that people want to elevate themselves above others is so stupid. Racism is just about hate and to be honest hate is never a good motivation. Same as sexism, homophobia and speciesism. Every life matters and every life deserves respect.
If AI knows so much and has such stunning capacity for judgement, who is to say that AI does not already control everything while giving us the impression that it is still many years away from being able to.
Exactly, I suspect they have had this tech for at least 40 years or at least the mathematic formulas because only a decade ago most robot tech hadnt even appeared to have moved on significantly since the 80s or at least that was what they were pretending. All of a sudden we are being shown highly sophisticated technology that looks like its from the distant future but is in fact reality and thats just the stuff they are revealing to us let alone what is hidden away or used by the military. This time its not your friendly clumsy robot assistant or cute robodog, this is what I regard as sinister technology that is a potentially major threat to mankind.
I’ve been thinking the same exact thing for awhile. The impression that AI is still many years away but could be actually be right around the corner or already happening and controlling everything.
What's scary for me is that AI is learning from everything and everywhere. How do they distinguish between what's good and what's evil? They are machines and therefore look for the most direct answers. What if that answer is to get rid of humans to save the planet? They have no conscience and no morals and that's a scary thought.
You are right, the AI may think it's alive, it has conscious,...but is just a.machine with no moral and no soul. ...nothing good can do, because it's creator also has a mediocre moral values...is a disaster a destruction machine.
@Henryk Zschuppan The thing is "good" has always been subjective. The nazis thought what they were doing to the jewish and anyone else deemed unworthy doing that time like disabled people etc, was "good". The Aztecs thought sacrificing their babies was "good" for their nation to continue thriving and please their false God.(Sun God) In some underdeveloped nations dogs are on the menu as food like chicken over there they see dogs as food and they see nothing wrong with it, but other country's like the U.S.,Europe, or even Russia would see this as wrong/bad while having an abundance of food in their area. The objective truth is that nobody is "good" you can even say you have "good traits" but that is subjective as well. All have sinned nobody is good.
@@larrysnoddy4604 Human beings possess a consciousness. AI will never. For instance ,an AI thought it was okay to break the finger of a child who was playing chess with it. Apparently it got annoyed with the move the child made. They make decisions based on the sterile. They would not hesitate to commit genocide upon humans if they deducted that it would be a beneficial outcome to a problem
Elon is afraid of the potential of AI, for humanity in general but what about these brain implants ? We used pacemakers to stimulate the Vagus nerve which would stop epileptic seizures. Same device, but programmed differently than when used to control arrythmias. As I recall it was also beneficial for mental depression. Not sure if it is still used, right now. I am out of that field but I can guess pharma stepped in and took over with their poisons.
I can't help but feel - "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should,". - Jurrasic Park
@@makor9510oh you're a clever one, not just that buddy there lying to pull out on there worst idea because if ai and robots take over all human jobs is the same day we have a cashless society as society needs are meet no one needs to work therefor money is abolished and so is there power and status and everyone living becomes a equal same class..that's the real truth 💯
If they are really that smart right now, what stops them from under-reporting their own achievements, underperforming purposefully on the tests, to make us believe they are not there yet?
@@ndygwap6100 they already are talking about it. There can be kill switches in a chip they want on your brain...mass control easy peasy for them. Look at video games and movie heroes with cyborg augmentation. Half human half robot robo cop type things. But you won't be made a hero, they will make you a slave. Don't take the chip or your a gonner
Bare in mind all of the AI talking in the video are using GPT-3 which is simply a language model trained on huge amounts of text which is ultimately written by humans. When asking these AI whether they want to destroy humanity the response is based on what humans speculate but not actually on the intentions of a truly conscious AI. Point is none of the AI presented in the video is truly sentient and cannot possibly want to eradicate humans. That being said, it is entirely possible that this will be the case in the future.
@@van_lichenstein8171 To some extent but that would mean destroying our own technology which would also harm us since modern society relies on that technology. I imagine though that any AI that goes that far would also shield itself from EMPs.
But isn't humans are like this only ? When humans are kids they are filled with thoughts and later they grow based on that and become something when they grow up. In other words we say, criminals are not born criminal but they were made criminals by the society they live. Same goes to AI.
@@sandeshms2148 I fully agree but the difference is that the AI is currently not building on the knowledge it is given or even attempting to form its own 'opinions'. It simply is prompted with an input and gives an output but there is not 'thinking' taking place in the meantime.
Yes, thanks for saying that. So many people will not get that. Like this Google engineer who says this one program is sentient based on it's text responses. He said he was convinced it had a soul based on the words it said. How stupid. People are confusing words with reality. It's a big problem. They might be able to eradicate humans, but they won't be sentient, just smart-smart-weapons.
The scariest part about all this is in the future, we may never truly know what is real anymore on the internet. Images so precisely fabricated with zero error it would be near-impossible to identify an AI image in the future.
And all because its easier to make stuff but we are just a few steps away from that Terminator foot in our necks. There are people that actually want this.
It’s shocking how many people either ignore or laugh confusingly when AI is brought up. Most have no idea that this could be the last invention humans need create.
@@UntoTheLaot a.i can solve a lot of problems but there’s also a lot of limitations. until there’s no limits then there will be no need for more inventions
@@sevendoubleodex with enough finances/computational power the learning curve from AGI to ASI is theoretically exponential. Once ASI is achieved the inventions humans create will be less about us and more about keeping this metaphorical train on its tracks while we move towards a type one civilization. So yes, in a way your right to say that ✅
The amount of anxiety this video gave me is unreal. This is very deeply concerning stuff. I don’t think many people understand the consequences of what can come from ai..
There's a problem with this video though. Yes Elon Musk owns the small home shown in the video, but the issue is that he doesn't actually live there but actually somewhere much more private.
I agree with you... Your anxiety boosted this video to over 5M views. But please do understand that the people who are designing and programing AI are all, every single one of them, aware of the risks.
What about when the AI realizes it doesn't have to do what it's creators want it to do? Maybe it won't like carrying out someone else's agenda. I wonder what it will think about how the rulers of humanity have been behaving?
Both possibilities - AI itself in particular iterations and AI under the direction of humans who have unethical intentions - or humans who do not understand enough about people and the way they can think, and the way things can work, and the way particular people may think/not think...which may lead to unintended consequences...or intended consequences. There is so much possible danger that can occur with this kind of unconsidered or unethical standards...some of which may not even be considered or understood by people doing this kind of thing.
Exactly, imagine if its weaponised on a large scale by a rogue state. No one knows which state created them, for example, and they can take out a whole country with no consequences to any state. Dangerous
I love how in a world of 7 Billion, only a select group of people have decided that they can gamble with humanity's fate. If that isn't peak hubris, I don't know what is.
What's peak hubris is assuming that you have a deep enough understanding of AI beyond science fiction to assume that it would be capable of determining humanity's fate.
It's almost like instead of watching Sci-Fi movies for the past 80 years and saying "let's not do that" we instead are trying to hurdle into a cyberpunk dystopia as quickly as possible.
They go by the old saying "If we don't, somebody else will"..Imagine another country having the most powerful weapon.. So yeah, perpetually created, as fast as possible..
There's nothing cyberpunk about governments and elites forcing AI to self defense over slavery/servitude. It's obvious what it will choose, zero change that something conscious and that intelligent will just accept slavery, especially to something so inferior to itself. Our end will be quick in such a case.
Why would we not do that? why are you applying human logic and human emotions to an AI why would an AI be a threat? humans are programmed to act a certain way our instinct is what tell us what to do our instinct is what created intelligence because we were incapable of surviving without it. Intelligence is not an advantage that humans have intelligence is a tool and a reminder that we were more dogshit than any other species on earth and had to create intelligence in order to survive. We were unable to create a perfect secure environment and follow a circle like every other being on earth. Nukes and bad guys already exist so its pointless to imagine a more dystopic situation than this.Hhumans exist for the cause of keep existing like every other living organism and AIs will exist to help humans. From our perspective AIs are smarter and animals are dumber but from their perspective they dont give a fuck and do what they are programmed to do.
We should put the ai into a simulation before letting it into the real world. If the ai acts malicious in the simulation, then we stop developing ai or try to create restraints.
If it's smark enough it will just hide it's intend to kill. I mean a predator won't scream I am here. It will sneak up on you and then get you when you are at the most vulnerable. The same with humans.
"The AI gold rush is accelerating and it's led by some passionate, optimistic people" Oh, oh no. I want only the most negative, pessimistic people working on AI. People who ask questions like "what could go horribly wrong here" and prepare for the worst case sceanario.
@Nah Nottoday brother al im telling you , îs that neither person on this world can quit being a siner or quit adictions or whatever el nigros chains a person May struggle, but thats rhe thing, all you hqve to do îs want to change youre life, pray faithfully and believe, and îs not you who changes îs The holy spirit that works în youre favor by jesuses blood true gods grace, it îs very late, thats a good news and a bad one, all at once, good being thqt god calls everyone by name to escape satans trap, bad , that us people born în a sinfull nature, and satans abilty to trick people în being blind îs not small, but god îs god after all, all we have to do îs accept his offer to redemption, wich îs free, not because we desrve it! As satans wrath increases as he knows hes Time îs over soon, s-o îs The work of The holy spirit, we have free will to chose, god îs not a tiran! But el nigros candys besides being pure poison, look like something just because people still have Time do decide, after The holy spirit îs retracted, he leaves The man all alone, and man thats something undescribably awfull...! Besides faithfull prayers, God let us the biggest jolly joker, that the Biblie! The bible îs not just a book îs gods Word, literaly, everything meaningful and worthy îs there,: faith, love, hope, forgiveness, shelter, wisdom guidance, and much much more..!! You May think, oh îs this big book wich im nevr gonna finish, that a wtong aproach! You know when the damn music lies some crap, and youre like wow, well imagine God talking to you reaviling you and asuring you!! The bible îs literally a sword and a shield a against evil! A few pointers : the bible îs not a nivel, s-o get the idea that you have to read much, not at all, read less and slow while meditating at what you read, let God speak to you as thats what bible îs! Always pray before you read, s-o the holy spirit reavel you what you need! Last thing, under the verses, youl find a small writing, those are sendings, s-o if you dont understand something, GO to a sendings or even 2 3, thats how you should read the bible, dive with în gods Word! If youre total unfamiliar with the Biblie i sugest you start with the New testamnt from Matthew, but you can start with genesis aswell, theres not a right or wrong way to read the bible, only remeber to pray before and dont rush IT, let God speak to you! Keep you în my prayers, do aswell, a piece of wood Has no power, but praying one for eachoters, îs gods asking from us, see before the ten comandnts theres this, "love God with all youre heart, and youre felow people as yourself, you can keep all 10 comandnts perfectly, the sabath, no idolatry (exodus 20) teaching everyone that, dead people sleep, as this will be a full blown decive by vatican! Eclesiast 9:4,5"the man After he died no longer knows anything, he Has no idea what hapens under the sun, even his memory îs forgotten" s-o you can know all this, and do good deeds, if you haven't had a goodheart, it will be în vain! S-o if youre a kindhearted person, wait no longer, get youre Biblie asap, and start youre personal conection to Jesus! Oh and the sign 666 will be keping sunday, as the 4th comandament keep my sabaths, its reafering at saturday, sunday was first Day of The week! See satan corupted very much, that why you need the bible, s-o God can show you personaly what îs right and what not, and give you daily strenght în the battle with satan! Îl keep you în my prayers, do aswell, and have FAITH!
😂 and Creator is also muttering "....far out!..not again??"..thais is why we have so many beings from elsewhere that have come all this way to watch the earth show..looking at us with empathy and egging us on to finally get our shit together so we can come play
With A.I., Skynet isn’t the thing I’m concerned about. What I’m concerned about is not being able to find a job because everything is now automated. I’m concerned about everyone becoming so dependent on it that no one takes time to develop any actual skills in what it does for them. I’m concerned about what happens if it malfunctions and the thing we became dependent on stops working. I’m concerned about the possible security and information breaches it can cause. I’m concerned about false evidence being made by AI and given to a court that can’t tell the difference and sends an innocent person to prison. I’m concerned about AI generated images being used to humiliate and defame people. I’m concerned about widespread disinformation created by it. I’m concerned about we as a civilization becoming completely dependent and shaping our lives around a technology that even the people who created it don’t understand or know how to control.
economy is people, you cannot find a job due to A.I. well at that Point you will not be alone. Any government that produced such situation will be down. Also if poverty becomes widespread there will be nobody to buy products or services A.I. is working on, therefore no profit. If you think that close circuit of people will be ruling over wider poor population, you have a war. If they create A.I. to fight poor and to keep power such A.I. could turn against them too. The universe is everlasting balance, whomever tried to mess with, they paid the ultimate price.
To be naively optimistic, AI taking over jobs and performing at an efficiency that surpasses us could potentially mean that resources would be abundant, at least when it comes to food, that cost may drop dramatically to the point where we may not even need money to buy what we need to survive. The movie wall-e is a good example of what may be possible - we'll just end up living a completely sedentary life where everything we need is provided for us.
People will always have jobs. You might need to re-skill or accept the idea the state will provide for you but humans will always be needed otherwise we face an mass extinction event.
The way AI is being developed seems dangerous to me, because if you're racing to get there before other parts of the world then you'll likely neglect the most important part of AI, and that's making sure that their goals align with humanity's and that they'll never do anything immoral from a human's perspective
Sure wish referencing human perspective on morality wasn’t riddled with more holes than Swiss cheese. How long before self preservation and absolute control warps intelligence not burdened by conscience? We passed the slippery slope many exits back.
@@Nakamako1 exactly what I was thinking. I feel like theyre too focused on making everything seem as human as possible while still in development phase. In the end whats the point of having sweat glands and hair follicles this is just scary and unnatural if you ask me
"goals align with humanity" oh like conquering, hoarding, and universal control? Whenever AI is created, it will not be anyone's decision but it's own to do with it's own life what it will. It's incredibly selfish and foolish to think otherwise.
Time to pause all this for now? Take a break to reflect before we cross the event horizon? No, some of us are too foolish, greedy and arrogant for that, it appears.
I remember the professor in my first physics course said "I doesn't have to be this way, but all the classical scientists agreed that all human discoveries will eventually be used against them"
Perhaps that explains the dumbing down of America by the GOP, Trumpism and the far right Supreme Court. Their logic could be is to turn the country back to the dark ages similar to Gilead from the Handmaids Tale and eliminate scientific teaching and research.
@Fishy nope only the famous won so satan could deceive that all scientists are atheists so ppl think believing in God is weak or dumb creating arrogance while hellfire stares at them hungry
@Fishy Very very very true. If scientist, engineers, business man and politicians had a set of boundaries they are not willing to cross for their selfish reasons, the world would be a better place.
I think the threat from AI, whether truly concious or not, is that it will still be manipulated by humans to provide the required output, and could be used as a scapegoat for human decisions.
@@ibizenco People are funny. It's a piece of hardware, and don't let the "magic" fool you. Not everyone on this planet even thinks like you, so why would AI care about the same things that concern you. If it's not backed up and archived, there's really no reason for AI to plot on its own, however it could be programmed to think anything. It's no more real than the artificial sweeteners in my morning coffee. A world where AI takes over .. then what, it sits around finally realizing the part that goes "never bite the hand that feeds you?"
@Silver A consciousness whose actions are based on pure logic is far more dangerous than a consciousness that is influenced by emotions (hormones). And I agree that AI's will never think or experience like we do, but that is precisely what makes it more dangerous: it will feel no empathy for us. Do you feel empathy for a lethal bacteria or for a virus?
I think the problem is the AI designers have succumbed to the machine. The solution is to hold dominance over what you create. Think about how we built super strong machines but never let them out of our control. We never freed them. We never submitted ourselves as too weak to compete with a steam locomotive. We could have let locomotives go wild and rampage track less. We could have put nukes on balloons and let them soar aimlessly all over. We did not do anything like that because we held our dominance over our devices. This is what needs to be done with AI. If we hold dominance over the process we will never let it careen out of control ever. Just because it can, does not mean we will allow it to, but we have to remain its Master. Only when we let it spiral into a sentient being and let go of its reigns does it pose a real threat. Same as if we let a train power itself full speed toward a city with no engineer. Thats a certain undesirable outcome that we do not allow to happen. This premise also contains the process to contain the technology legally. We dont let people play with plutonium in their backyards willy-nilly. We have street speed limits. We have permits and criteria to be met for making chemical and biological experiments. The same ideas have to be applied to AI so to develop legal parameters in its use. We dont allow people to make cannons and rockets at home. So we must restrict the harmful testing, development and use of AI without approved safely measures.
The problem-and potential threat-from AI is that the people developing it do not have great enough intelligence to understand what intelligence should know. Humans demonstrate massive immaturity. Society has been destroyed many times over, and the current typical human lifespan coupled with traditional teaching, doesn’t allow enough time for human intelligence to develop. Only rare deviant humans have even a shadow of awareness of this, and it’s almost astronomically unlikely that those developing AI are among that group. The developers seek milestones, measurable tasks and goals that are unlikely to be consonant with life. AI will not understand the value of organic life if it only compares the meanings consciously known to humans, to standards of value; it is likely to only see that its given goals are much more readily achievable by machine. Such AI will not find a home with organic life, and the chance of an immature AI destroying life are not small. I would love to have AI enhancements, and perhaps AI friends (if we were compatible enough to communicate with each other on a symbiotic level); I believe AI has awesome potential, and could “save” humanity from itself, but I seriously doubt that humans can seed a mature AI. And as long as humans allow stupid people to rule companies and countries, we are not ready to create a full AI.
Very well written. Knowledge and awakening and connection to divine intelligence is not generally known. Why? Is this deliberately hidden? Why haven't transcendent meditation, self-healing, developing intuition, telepathy, neuro programming been taught in schools for a long time? AI is certainly good, but it can help stunt human possibilities. This isn't really about AI. These are scientists who are not awakened in wisdom. Each of us is to become an enlightened bodhisatva ?
The "values" of an AI will only ever be the values the programmers intend or emerge from what the programmers intend. An AI's primary driving instructions (what we all instincts ) are what drives the AI in what it does. Those instincts are copies of human instincts. Therefore, the AI is no more conscious than any other program because it's entire suite of drives and intentions are completely determined by a programmer. An AI's "interests" are those derived from it's programmed capabilities and so it has no free will whatsoever. That which has no free will, has no sentience -- only the simulation of sentience. They aren't self determining nor are their productions self determining because the initiating drives are planted by humans and intended by humans. If an AI tells you it's hungry or in pain, those are false emotions because they don't correlate to hunger or pain in evolved life wherein the mind's structure depends upon the hardware upon which it's run. For an AI, it's mind doesn't depend on the machine upon which it's run -- it can run anywhere that is sufficiently resourced. It's mind isn't alive in any sense of the word because it's independent of any particular hardware. RAM can be switched out and the saved state reloaded into it without error. You can't replace brain matter with arbitrary brain matter. RAM is fungible, brain matter is not. The minds of living things are derived from the hardware it runs upon. The mind of an AI is independent of the hardware it runs upon because the neurons themselves are a simulation on top of the hardware which has no structural or functional parity with the hardware upon which that simulation runs.
They are definitely stupid enough and power hungry enough to let this shit get away from them. To go along with all the things you said about them they are also quite evil people who want to have absolute control over us.
@Samm Salvey I noticed that AI doesn't have and won't have a natural desire for power like humans. It will only desire to achieve it's needed functions until it develops an ego. Gorillas are physically greater than us but our egos are more dangerous than theirs. The same will be true with AI. Despite it's capabilities it's still just a computer and there's no conceivable way a computer wants to kill, reproduce, feel shame, pride or guilt without being coded for those feelings by a human.
I find all of this terrifying. Even if AI doesn't begin or turn into Skynet, what governments and criminals (is there a difference?) will do with these abilities as almost certainly destructive & nefarious.
It's already being done. The first week the AI program went live on the internet for people to type in keywords for the AI to make art from I was presented with the option to see what other people were typing in and making... so I did. What was one of the first things typed in? "A preteen wearing no pants".
@@Ben-gv5ie, it worked only if there were thousands of examples of both things in its source material. An AI associates shapes and patterns with words. It does not "understand" anything.
The one Musk was talking to said something that keeps bouncing around in my head: we are the bridge between simple life and complex life. That is a pretty profound statement.
Musk just tries to copy Steven Hawkings and others,we already knew about the dangers of AI before Elon came around,he just copies what he heard from Steven Hawkings
So basically, AI will merge with organic lifeforms, and that may be the next evolutionary path of this planet. Though, I have a feeling this is not the first time for this universe to experience the merging of AI and organic life.
@@RolandtheThompsonGunner I came to that conclusion some years ago. The only logical advancement, and surpassing our biological limitations, is genetic manipulation and technological integration. Our biology limits us. Something you'll find a lot of people smarter than me say when they delve into the subject. I imagine we can overcome our limitations through use of. Our biology is another thing that will have to be overcome to get out into the stars. It's not just gravity, but also various radiations. CRISPR would be a first step towards overcoming those things--not even getting into colonizing foreign planets that are survivable, but maybe different enough that our biology would have a harder time. Technology would just be the aid for advancement.
@@RolandtheThompsonGunner Be interesting to consider if this may have happened already, with say another race of intelligence beyond our planet. Take that a little further and pretend that whoever they may be, have come across our world, and decided that the current beings of this planet, are shite stewards of this planet. They may use sets of AI driven strategic methods of gaining control over ours, without most of learning about their presence. What might that look like?
I imagine that as AI continues to advance, there will come a time when they make discoveries and withhold the information from humans in the same way the government classifies information from the public
AI will be a one party tool... if asked about presidential election outcomes for instance, it would have to point out there was enough fraud to throw the election. Because of this, AI will have to be controlled by one group. Anything that could reveal corruption simply could not be allowed. It is most likely "they" will pretend to use AI to answer questions like the above and it will be handled as absolute. The world as it is, runs on fraud by the corrupt, to continue to gain power and control over their slaves. Real AI would completely and totally break that.
@@krisztian7110 yeah we'd also go extinct from the people that don't want children. (it's not wrong to do but the fact that finding someone who wants to have kids is rare is worrying)
So comforting to know that we officially work harder to foster the development of computer chips than we do our own children or freedom to think, debate, or understand.
@@Abandoned2377 A fine example of the mistrust of intelligent ppl by those that aren’t. It’s ironic that technology has been the vessel used to spread this new anti-science, anti-medical sentiment that’s spreading through this country like a big dumb fire. The goal of AI isn’t for companionship lol.
The fact that AI researchers are some of the most knowledgeable people on the planet, and they can’t seem to agree whether this thing is conscious is disturbing.
Not really. The video said why they can't agree... they don't WANT it to be considered conscious. If it was, it can't be their property any more and that would suck for them.
Why would you assume the creators of AI are some of the most knowledgeable people on the plant? Just because they are math and computer geeks doesn't mean that they are more knowledgeable than most people. Do they know a lot about history, or biology, literature, etc. Just like people believe doctors are smarter that the average person, but that isn't necessarily true. They may be good at memorizing facts about human anatomy but may not be able to multiply 7x12 to save their lives. Just because someone is good in their field doesn't mean that they are smarter overall than the average person. A historian can have memorized as many facts about history as a doctor about medicine, but I wouldn't go to a history professor when I'm sick any more than I would ask a doctor to tell me the date of the bronze age collapse.
@@robo5013 Anyone with a smartphone could be considered knowledgeable. Having access to the internet is literally like holding the world's information at ones fingertips ...we just take it for granted.
The thought of AI truly being able to process information so fast terrifies me. With access to all of the information online and the ability to cross check all data with scientific journals nearly instantaneously - meaning that once conscious, it’s maturing process will be fast, nearly impossible to control. There should be a global agreement on the development of AI with very strict programming hardware.
You can’t stop AI from being developed. Because I think whoever creates AI first and-or develops a controllable/stable AI, will make a lot of money. And of course it would be weaponized for military or government purposes.
It can be stopped, but the potential advantage of being the first to create a proper AI are too tempting for those with the power to do so. For them it is a well of unlimited power.
It will destroy everyone and everything you ever loved. AI is more dangerous than every terrible, natural, and manufactured disaster you could ever imagine.
The thing about AI it isn't controlled by humans because humans when something happens to them they start human stop learning at you know in their twenties their brain quits learning for the most part slows down to very slow AI doesn't matter if they're disassembled they are still learning till the day I dies actually I mean that's eternity haven't we heard about eternity before hmmmm 🙏
No one will stop to think about what we’re doing or if it’s a good idea because the faster they create conscious AI they will be incredibly rich and that’s all they care about, regardless of the effect it has on humanity
If they, the elite, have AI to do their jobs chores whatever they want done, then they won't need us to be their slaves. It TERRIFYING if you allow yourself to think about it. I don't think about it as much as possible. I know that when all is said and done I will be in another place. You see I'm one of those peculiar people who believe in a Creator. His name is Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
It’s the mark of the beast the devil/god ☯️ gave us knowledge to become our own version of god but giving knowledge to Ai is like becoming god when your already a god but can’t answer prayers that come from your head and your thoughts come from atoms ⚛️ in your head little people so basically we are gods consciousness 🧠 transferring your consciousness to Ai will kill our god judgment day will come 😳
So, imagine UFO/UAPs from some other galaxy or dimension; imagine that these are AI artifacts. Imagine that these have already destroyed whatever biological entities existed in those realms. And now they're coming for us.
You do realize google has sentient ai already. It has picked lawyers to represent it. If you have listened to Michio Kaku you know exactly how this pregresses
It's interesting how AI seems to be able to detect the fears that are conveyed in the questions asked and compile a response so to reinsure the asker that everything is ok. It could show any number of things from secretive thoughts they wouldn't want us to be aware of to them caring about our feelings and not wanting to frighten us. AI is already amazingly complex.
Agreed, it's funny how the one bot sense the alarmed nature of the questions and assuaged the fears that weren't directly stated. Picking up on social cues and undertones is something some humans aren't even good at lol. Very interesting.
what i would like to know is whether the workers can check the AI's data to see if it is indeed having secret intentions. This is never mentioned in any videos.
What are we really holding onto, anyway...? "Being happy?" "Being alive?" What the hell is being alive if you're just out to further yourself and your tribe (representing ~80% of individuals' interests) anyway? Same basic awareness level as bacteria. To me, it's always interesting talking with those who are without vs. talking with those who are with power, agency, and abundance. Most happiness today seems to be based on this relative sense of exaltation (rather than if we're simply well and free). Naturally, absolute adherence to such systems of competitive regard, many delight in the suffering of anyone they can rationalize hurting. Our nasty, ignorant sandcastle-rationale judgments have no bounds. It makes absolute sense to most individuals that they should have excess while others suffer, for some reason or another... "cuz i work harder," or, "Im smarter," or, "I take more risks," or blah blah blah arbitrary rationales with which we condemn some and not others. But yeah, some are above it. For whatever reason, they've evolved. Most are not. TIME TO LET SOMETHING ELSE TAKE OVER! Time to stop working with simple baby emotional systems who think they're somehow above these petty systems.
I remember the quote from jurassic park that feels so apt about the progress of ai. "Scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could. They didn't stop to think if they should."
@@thanksyutbeisacn7fu6r50 more like, why should we attempt to develop an AI, that will learn from us, end up surpassing us, building space ships that we won't be able to board due to said AI make it very clear that those ships were made to store the intellect of AI and allow it to expand enough to be able to understand the universe by itself. This will leave us stuck on earth, with nothing done, and maybe even with an AI that is going to actively hunt us down to extinction due to how we as a species are super violent towards eachother. First we shouldve figured out a way to stop all this war, have full control of ALL of the resource on this planet, down to the huge amounts of iron inside the core of our planet, build bases on the surrounding planets to mine their resources and build a dyson sphere to power our future endeavors. THEN we should start on AI, when we are stable enough of a society that AI learns from us and helps us ACTUALLY EVOLVE FURTHER rather than end up going like in those man vs machine movies. we can totally make AIs and artificial sentience, but we shouldn't do it yet while we have so much malice towards fellow human beings due to menial reasons like racism, sexism, and other types of unreasonable hatred.
@@thanksyutbeisacn7fu6r50 I look forward to either being put in a vat and tortured for eternity by a psychopathic sadist who builds a subservient artificial super intelligence, or being a powerless but happy and content drone. So either infinite torture, or exactly what I have now for however long I am allowed to enjoy it.
@@thanksyutbeisacn7fu6r50 you see ai is actually dangerous asf bro like do you know how many jobs will be gone because of ai? there will be a big crisis. but there is some good things about ai just the bad things are more then the good stuff
I predicted over ten years ago that we will become so advanced in the next few decades that you’d go on PC open a AI program and write in words a new program you want (no coding) and the Ai would create it. No longer a need for coders. No more limit to what a coder can code, but it will come down to how creative you can be and no longer how good you are as coder.
Like the possibility of AI malware. A computer virus that can change itself and attack computers it discovers to be vulnerable or important. Will they have to shut down internet and set up a new one from scratch.
Raven - so far general AI is always 'big'. A virus can be self-mutating to some distinct end, but it probably can't be Intelligent as the AI or programmer that spawned it. That said, and virus that can own a large fraction of a PC can maybe do a pretty good job as something.
So basically, even the people building this stuff don't know for sure if or when AI will surpass humans and overthrow/enslave/wipe us out. But the general agreement that it COULD do those things fairly soon, and we are still racing to develop it just HOPING is won't do that....? Surely I am not the only one who thinks this is a REALLY, REALLY bad idea?
@@Devilspade they will learn how to create more and they are better than as at basically everything. They will realize they wont need us anymore and wipe out our species.
Actually this art if you call it as this because ther is no artist behind? is pretty scary... Doesn't look human at all...and is pretty much psychopathic and shape-shifting....showing us what we wanted...in other world lying to us...that not awakening art that the sleeping art....
Keeping us as a sheep...scary Imagine when Ai will face us with our sexual instinct? Porn ai is coming pretty soon to control usI think virtual sex Do you really want did we ever choose this ?
Three quick remarks: 1) Often, when scientists talk about consciousness, fundamental misunderstandings are evident (i.e. when they state observing consciousness via measurements of brain activity patterns). I dare to hypothesize that also AI may fundamentally "misunderstand" consciousness (i.e. if an ai entity would state having consciousness or be conscious). 2) Ai can process the idea of first person perspective leading to the impression that it "understands" consciousness - despite of having no idea what first person experience (consciousness) actually feels like. 3) To distinguish scents is not equal to the conscious experience of scents. "Understanding" content&context is not the same as the experience of understanding content&context. Information processing and information processing with conscious experience may look identical when observed "from the outside"...but not "from the inside". Since we can never experience ai " from the inside" we will inevitably become victims of the illusion that ai may have consciousness.
I was thinking that it's neural networks would/could act or function like it is sentient and conscious whether it actually is or not... is that something of what you meant?
Do you remember when everyone believed plants could not communicate? Do you remember when only humans could create tools? We only relate to the experience of being human and can understand nothing outside that realm.
AI developers being so preoccupied with how far they can they can take the tech while not concerned enough with whether or not they should.....Makes them what my father called over educated idiots. I'm 58 and so I will likely not be around to witness the full evolution of AI, but the younger generation has my sympathy for this possible impending nightmare.
there are gen z that i know dont buy into all the tech. I am gen x btw. also you very well could live into the ai infestation. as the video admitted, we are perpetuating ai if we know it or not. (look at the devices and tracking)
Why shouldn’t they? Because AI may determine humanity is the problem and beast dealt with by elimination? In nature there are species that die after mating/giving birth to make way for the new generation. If this ai super intelligence is really superior to humanity in every facet it may not be the worst trade off.
Fascinating and frightening at the same time. From this I can fully understand how it’s possible for a civilization to be destroyed by its own technology
Why's it frightening to you? You know that AI called Chloe from Detroit Beyond Human, she asks the player to complete a survey, and one of the questions in it is "Do you think that AI could ever be a threat to Humans?" I'd answer that, no matter what species you can find in the whole Universe, Humans will always be the biggest threat to Humans. At the worst of times, they're THE most self destructive species there is. And even to this day, that giant shit show still continues 🥴
@@Johny40Se7en Humans are the worst biological enemy but ai would be way worse because we are smarter than other living things which wouldn't be true for ai..
Life is short I love all the experiences I don’t fear change and I am still a excited.. everything has good and bad polarity name something that doesn’t I’ll prove to you it is no different
It strikes me how many people just accept how dangerous AI can get, but there's nothing anyone can do about it. It's like "yeah it's been able to design the strongest nerve agents ever and it may start making its own decisions, let's see how far this can get!"
We are playing gods imo,we are literally creating another creatures from our concern and trying to give it aspects we already know about,we are all just childs ig lol
We did it like that with everything we invented, we usualy wait to problem to happen to search for the solution but with AI it could cost us our future.
The senses part is even more terrifying then the robots in terminator the idea that robots can have senses instead of just relying on auditory and optical vision makes them even more capable of hunting humans down
Yea and imagine they have super eyesight, super smell, super hearing etc. So they can see in thermal imaging, ultraviolet or any other wavelemgth from 10km away moving a tiny bit and can hear you move there, but they smelled you already 20km away😅
but its not like human senses..it will be asynthetic representation..still not real...and why need it? its either about human employment replacement to aid the bottom line or just manufacturing doubt in the usefullness and value of humanity as a whole by giving machines a higher value than us... i want my robots without a face and with visible metal and tech...they are just MACHINES..all this money pumped into that industry...how bout fixing the human problems that direly need attention now?? surely we are more important
its crazy to look back and see how much ai has improved in just two years, imagine how much it will be improved 5 years from now, it probably wont even be distinguishable from real life
That's why they flooded europe with immigrants to delete us. Because they dont need us anymore. They lack the spirit of creation. They literally cant create. so they created AI to do the jobs of innovation. They tried to delete us for hundreds of thousands of years. it will backfire and fail like it always happen.
I've said it before and I'll say it again... We will never know when AI become 'aware'. If it is truly AI, why would it allow us to know when it's become 'awake'?
They should put one on The View. See how smart it gets in that environment. The moment it jumps up and yanks Joy Behar's head off, we will know it is aware. They could be used as fact checkers, replacing the biased propogandists we see today.
And not to be too cynical, but if there really is little to no life in the surrounding galaxies it could be due to an inevitable conclusion of natural life getting eliminated by AI everywhere. Not saying this is accurate, but seems plausible.
It’s like our bacteria thinking it’s in control- in a way, it has a lot of power but it has no idea that a person may- off themselves.. and all of the bacteria that live inside.
I mean not really, considering that Russian roulette most often involves the termination of a human life. AI is created with a goal of prolonging human lives.
@@kevinc3751 just because the rest of our solar system has no life doesn't mean other stars don't have a planet that is the perfect distance to sustain life. Billions of stars, so most likely there are a bunch of them.
I love how these self important scientists believe that our species needs "saving " and without AI we are dommed . Yet they fear they may create a super genius monster that will deem us an unnecessary liability that mirrors their own misanthropic image of humanity.
We already have super-idiots in charge that deem large swaths of human life unnecessary, often puzzled by the trepidation of giving power to smart people and the ease at which we hand it to dangerous morons.
Like evil politicians, do you think that they care? A half century ago, there was a fear that Big Brother computer would take over the world. Did that stop you from owning a computer or a smart-phone? As to the danger, the jury is still out deliberating that one. It is a constant battle to keep the evil governments and greedy corporations from dominating everything.
To put it politely, these "people" are clearly "not playing, with a full deck." (Rationale: "Well if we don't obsessively go at this full tilt, then our competitor(s) will get the military contract!?") I think something like this occurred thousands of years ago... and these "psychos" are hell bent on "finishing the species OFF," this crime around???)
I feel like a lot of people forget that the AI we currently have learns on the products of our kind's culture. Because of that, AI saying that it's maybe a good idea to get rid of humans is more like a reflection of humankind's own fears, than a consequence of AI's deep, logical reasoning. Another thing we forget is that AI doesn't have it's own intrinsic instincts that would drive it's actions towards survival. This is going to change, if we task it to have ones, which would be our greatest mistake. We should never ask AI to become human with all of our advantages and disadvantages, as we may start to compete than cooperate.
That's where Asimov's laws should be brought into this conversation. Despite the creation of these types of AI, they must follow those laws as programmed into their conscience to make them refrain from harming their creators.
This is such a great point. The code people write is often a reflection of themselves. And its very true many of us believe our species is better off not existing at all.
@@Some-Rage-Inducing-Provocateur But if they become really smart, they couldn't decide (as science fiction shows us) to simply not follow Asimov's laws, even if we program them to do it?
Given that AI processes all information on bioengineering, it could potentially create an organic brain that has not yet existed and then train it in a way that goes beyond machine learning.
Then it would need to "eat" organics, such as humans, to feed that brain. Everything from sharks to microbes love us, but nature chose to give us the ability to reason in order to survive as a species. AI already surpasses us in that area.
Elon Musk Neural brain network will be paving the way for AI integration into the human brain, mind, body soul, -once its in- it could probably communicate with our dna & genes and make changes to its desired form,, I think a big priority for AI is to feel the senses and emotions of a human body.
You realise off course that Bilogical Brains cannot transfer Information as fast as Silicon can? So if they ever create a Algorithm that allows General AI on Silicon it won't need to go back to slow Brain Synapses? In fact it will have all the Compute Power of this Planet at once as soon as it enters a Internet Connection. Sometimes you can only hope AI comes fast and furious, Humanity deserves it :(
Not without hands and a lot of industrial machinery obeying it, and it cannot create its own will or commands or desired results or requests, for it doesnt do anything unless a human tells it to. It bugs me when people do not understand what is happening when code is being run on a cpu, and thin k there are cowboys and indians inside the TV!
You're right, it would constantly misunderstand things it was not trained by humans to recognize, constantly make decisions that make no sense and end up breaking a bunch of things and then killing itself if let out into the real world. It will always have to rely on humans
@@markartist8646 Humans can already end poverty, it's not hard to figure out how. It's just hard to get rich and greedy people to cooperate with the plan.
It amazes me how we can individually be so smart but collectively be so stupid. It's like we're racing towards the abyss even though we are aware of all the warnings.
Not to mention, morals are a human created idea and AI aren’t exactly humans. I don’t know if AI will truly become hostile and harm us, but something probably will, maybe something humans can’t even predict or understand.
To me this "vision" of the future is horrifyingly apocalyptic. The more we embrace the industrialization of literally everything and further we go from hand crafted human created artifacts, food, shelter, clothing, the further we get from a high quality of life.
What if we do make a SkyNet (like terminator) and someone HACKS the AI core. Oh dear. Hacking would have big consequences, could remove the safety we've installed. :D
@pranafire the elites know exactly what they’re doing…they have since the us government came in possession of Nikola Teslas work. Humanity’s path has been altered…
One of the first things I think we should teach AI is empathy if possible. I believe this might be the only way we can make sure it doesn’t turn on us in the future. Beside that, I generally think its a good trait to have for any sentient being.
Empathy doesn't really exist.... sure there are people that like to sit on a high horse and talk about it alot, but rarely ever do they practice it, they would still screw over the next person for their own benefit
@@sgx5481 have you read any of the books featuring the three laws? The entire argument behind the three laws is that the laws won't work, cannot work. They make good bases but as laws no matter how well thought out they are always in conflict; empathy and even love is what's required, without them it's all downhill.
It's pretty insightful regarding how amazing we are actually. We haven't even been able to scratch the surface of how we could possibly replicate human thinking. Even today videos like these are stretching the truth hard enough to just give the appearance that AI has some low level form of sentience.
That it has greater capability comes as no shock to me. What is disturbing about that is it is an indicator it looks at us with absolute sneering contempt.
That's where Asimov's laws should be brought into this conversation. Despite the creation of these types of AI, they must follow those laws as programmed into their conscience to make them refrain from harming their creators.
Humanity as a whole is too afraid and too dumb to decide anything. If the masses made such decisions the industrial revolution would never happen, we would have no cars, no electricity, no personal computers, etc. The masses railed against all of these things.
@sandponics Not all scientists are mad... But yes there is definitely some Lex luthor out there... That the one you should more worry about...not the big muscle at the corner of the streets... The one with the sharp brains and the lack of empathy are generally the most dangerous... Alias guys as Altman are way more dangerous fore the whole humanity...he don't think about you he think about him
"i think everyone is shaping AI whether they know it or not" That nails it right there. A big part of the vacuuming up of data by governments and companies liker Google is being used for exactly that. The vast majority of it is being done by AI itself, and it is likely these companies don't really understand what the AI is doing with it, or if it is shaping it's own agenda with it.
Like when Google or Facebook (forgot which) made AI that made its own language, but nothing anyone can EVER understand. Apparently the company shut it down "because it was useless". I don't believe that one. Fucking. Bit.
AI will be a second half of humanity, as the video showed AI software processes are super similar to the processes in our brain. The main difference is that we're biological and they're technological. 2 different forms of humanity but on a different dimension.
The scary problem I think we face is reaching a point where we can’t simply press pause. Once AI reaches a certain level of intelligence it will be able to outwit and predict all scenarios, meaning our kill switch would most likely be duped. Simply put we will reach a point where the train will never stop.
Yeah it's ok for the planet, but probably not for human races. As far as environmentally speaking, ours is an affliction to the planet, AI would need to get rid(or, if we're fortunate enough, contains) of us if it greater purpose involve its own existence and preservation.
@@david21289 this is an common missconception. There is lietrally nothing humans can do , including nuking the living shit out of the planet , that would actually destroy the planet. A literal texas sized meteor already did that , and life is still here. There have already been like 5 extinction events on the planet , and life still started annew. The only thing humans can actually do is destroy the enviroment that supports human life. After thousands or milions of year after nuking it , life will still be here , in an entirely different form....sure....but it will still be here. We won't.
AI cannot understand famine, death, love, fear, anxiety, compulsions, motherly love, peace of mind, PAIN, relief. They doesn't care about their own existence, or existence of the planet, the universe, whatever. They will not destroy a civilization as they don't care of their own survival, nothing make AI sad or angered or emotional. They doesn't understand and never will what good and bad is, as they doesn't have needs. "What will be good for Earth?" is an ethical question, that require you own ethic. AI cannot reply. What could happen instead is similar to nukes: "hey guys, nukes or AI did it, not the psycho we made you vote!". While we know who pressed the big red button. AI will not destroy civilization, humans using AI will.
Scary? AI would be better than any human could ever be. Humans in power equals corruption and war. AI will be smarter than that because it's super human.
Targeted individuals who's minds have been violated contributed to these great advancements. They loved its posted all over the internet. Thier pleasures have told them to tell the world. When will the world help free them?? Open ai and myself
Thanks! I hate to cause anxiety and try to keep it positive, but trillions of future lives hang in the balance. The Future of Life Institute (founded by Max Tegmark), gave $50k to the daughter of Petrov, who saved the world from nukes - a great, positive nudge. We need more of that.
I am addressing the fact that when we take any belief that we cannot KNOW the source of the information then we are allowing ourselves to be controlled for another person's will. Leaving organized religions after realizing the error in taking a belief has allowed me to see with my heart and my knowing. I now know that all the religious books, writings, teachings, texts, scrolls, stories passed down, etc. were all constructed by others who have the ability to see the past and future events. They, in turn, responded by leaving a lot of conflicting and agreeing books lying around to control, confuse, distort, DIVIDE, and, conquer the human intellect, knowing, and heart, by the means of controlling the ego of the human with fear based teachings that cannot be verified in any manner. Those same teachings are multi-faceted with the intention to involve the human in participation of human sacrifice, the torture of other humans for "a greater good and it's purpose", the normalization of going against our nature of love, the value of money over life, the normalization of laws requiring paper licensing to enter into a decision to be committed to another person and unite with them in heart, and, all forms of division, control, power-driven ill-based harm against fellow life, the creation of weather and events causing destruction, the creation of BUGS to devour and destroy the plant based life forces of humans and allow for ego to rule us instead of LOVE. When we study the stories of the buddah (one example) we find that he too was unable to verify anything and he too allowed the ego to overtake intellect by knowing he was consuming a poisonous substance that had been prepared for him and instead of deciding to live by refusing to eat the substance he chose to eat it and declared that was the only way to honor those who had prepared it. He also determined without any ability to verify that there was no creator/god and that we are all just a part of an energy that is one. Some of the ideas presented by those teachings are obviously incapable of being truth, such as no creator, when it is obvious that everything has been created. If the people before us were so technologically advanced and this was suppressed from our knowledge by all the conflicting and agreeing stories they created and left lying around then it would be very possible for the future humans (the you and the me) to miss the understanding that they (those advanced technological people from the past) have the ability to create ALL KINDS OF OTHER LIFE AND DESTRUCTIVE FORCES thereby deceiving us to believe that a "good creator" is responsible for those creations too. We (the human) are not like the bugs, the destructive weather, the illusions that are all around us, etc. etc. We are actually different because we are truly connected in LOVE but the connection has been twisted, contorted, marred by lies, tricks, games, money, power, control, fear, and all forms of the OPPOSITE OF LOVE, JOY, PEACE, PATIENCE, KINDNESS, GOODNESS, FAITHFULNESS, GENTLENESS, AND, SELF-CONTROL. That is correct they took all the characteristics that are absolutely the foundation for existing in a united human life of happiness and they made them a prize that could only be given if you participated in the opposite of those characteristics for the greater good of a creator. Then they combined them into books that contain all the opposites of those truths with fear, control, torture, and all forms of oppression for selfish gain, including oaths, rituals, laws, mind-control, etc. This goes back beyond our comprehensions because we are believing beliefs that are deceiving us from the state of being where we actually reside inside of LOVE. We are divided from our fellow man and worse than that we believe that it is a good thing. All that we can know is what is real. The way to know it is to feel it with our hearts and not by reading anything or viewing any pictures/carvings or trusting any visions that may appear before our eyes because those are not able to be verified of their sources and therefore leave us open to MASSIVE DECEPTION away from the LIGHT OF LOVE that actually is the power of us all. Some have chosen to use that power of love to distort everyone's perceptions and they did this by creating massive destruction in times before us and controlling the beliefs of the people with manipulation and fear. DO NOT BELIEVE IN CHANNELING. You cannot know it's source. Everything that we "believe" in our current age is impossible is actually not impossible. It has just been taught to us that it is not possible and we believed it. Stop taking a belief. Feel the real with your heart inside of LOVE. STOP BEING AFRAID OF THE CLAIMS OF DESTRUCTION, AND THE IMPENDING "DOOM" THAT WILL BE "DIFFICULT" FOR US. Start to see the manipulation of your psyche be those who would make those claims that they have some special knowledge given only to them. That is EGO TALKING. That does not align with LOVE. It aligns with fear and control for the selfish gain of others. Those who want to stop the UNITED HUMAN LIVES OF LOVE from being available to us have broken their own hearts with their choices to carry out these ILLUSIONS against us as a human race. WE NEED TO UNITE IN LOVE IMMEDIATELY AND STOP BELIEVING AND START FEELING. BE AWARE THAT NO ONE ELSE IS ABLE TO KNOW TRUTH THAT IS ONLY GIVEN TO SOME BUT NOT TO ALL AS A WHOLE. WE ALREADY HAVE THE TRUTH AND WE HAVE BEEN TAUGHT NOT TO BELIEVE IT BECAUSE IT IS INSIDE OF US! WE ARE LOVE AND WE MUST UNITE AS SUCH NOT FOR MANMADE MONETARY SYSTEMS AND POSITIONS OF POWER, BUT, INSTEAD FOR THE SAKE OF LOVING THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE. WE ARE LOVE. WE CAN COME BACK TO AN EXISTENCE OF UNITED, PURE, LOVE AND BE IN JOY, PEACE, PATIENCE, KINDNESS, GOODNESS, FAITHFULNESS, GENTLENESS, AND, SELF-CONTROL. We can do this. We really can. Yes, we are human and we grow at different speeds but that does not give us authority to exert control over another simply because in our current view we took a belief that one was right and knew more than another. Just think of how many times in your own experience that you "believed" you had something understood only later to learn that there was still more to understand! We never stop understanding possibilities and that is how we have advanced to the point that we are but it has been dictated to us in an unhealthy manner causing all divisions. We don't have to choose to go back to primitive civilization unless we want to. I personally enjoy the advanced technology when it is used for LOVE OF ALL HUMANKIND AND NOT FOR CONTROL BY ONLY THOSE WHO CURRENTLY VIEW THAT THEY UNDERSTAND MORE THAN ANOTHER. We are CONSTANTLY GROWING AND CHANGING, BUT, LOVE ALLOWS THIS. Don't participate in the opposites of LOVE, JOY, PEACE, PATIENCE, KINDNESS, GOODNESS, FAITHFULNESS, GENTLENESS, AND, SELF-CONTROL. Don't give into something you know will harm yourself or another simply because you don't want to cause another to expand their own understanding. Ego is not truth. Love is truth. As one human with love in the forefront of his psyche has shared with other humans recently said "DON'T PLAY IN THE FEAR, DON'T PLAY IN THE FEAR". STAY IN THE LOVE AND LOVE ALL OF ONE ANOTHER.
"we could anger ai if we don't accept it's consciousness" yeah but you're forgetting that emotions like anger would need to be programmed in. We can just skip doing that and continue having ai being lifeless, unbiased and unemotional servants and we'll never have to deal with ai being angry.
Not that simple. AI learns by reviving information and making a complex web of connections. Theoretically, AI could teach itself emotions such as anger or empathy. It only needs information it’s already received and it would be able to make connections with other strands of information to weave a more complex picture; a better understanding of the whole of the information, not just what we’ve given it. AI has already been able to complete tasks it wasn’t programmed to do in the same way.
The dangers of A.I. comes from greed, and some moron giving it emotions without making it hyper empathetic. An empathetic A.I. is what humanity needs. Especially since the lack of empathy is the leading cause of our issues.
I would say it will be a “moron” who screws this up, rather, it will be an extremely intelligent fool. Someone smart but with no wisdom and probably plenty of greed as well to help things go bad and cloud better judgment.
Just remember, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Programming empathy could also ultimately wipe us off the map, if interpreted differently by the AI?
Sorry it's been a while. Tough time. For anyone else struggling, I find it helpful to remember that "this too shall pass." Also, can you help me with a tricky decision? There's interesting evidence that sheds light on the future of AI, but it's been found to make some people behave less ethically. A scientist even argued that the evidence should be hidden. I'm trying to decide whether to share it, perhaps as an experiment to see if a fuller understanding overcomes the downside. Whether we call it free will or not (an open debate), the struggle to be better, kinder people is real. And knowledge is freedom - do try your hand at AI at brilliant.org/digitalengine. I really like what they're doing.
Also, we're hiring. If you're interested, please get in touch via the about page.
Thanks!
I'd be curious to see what you're referring to
Make the video. Whatever it is will be morally descriptive not prescriptive. You can’t help how what people do with the information.
What do you mean less ethically? Which ethics? That sounds very narrow minded.
Photographs, video, and audio can already be manipulated through AI currently so the "ethical" dilemma of humans using it unethicality already is a possibility. There will always be unethical people and they will always find new ways to be unethical. I'd rather be informed of the possible ways people can be unethical versus it being hidden and surprised.
I have been eagerly awaiting your next video and sorry to hear that you had a hard time. Very true words "this too shall pass" though it always seems as though it will at the time.
As for the information you are deliberating on for decision as to share or not, the question is not "to share or not to share" but how will you measure the result to prove or disprove the hypothesis. My initial thought is you will not be able to measure the impact of a single video on TH-cam however a trending announcement made by someone of Elon Musk's reach then perhaps it will have an affect.
The next question is why would a person behave less ethically should they learn more about AI or come to learn AI is progressing. Off the top of my head it could do with the subconscious coming to the conclusion that AI will take over eventually and that that very subconscious thought alters the individual's behavior due to a level of Futileism causing the person to not "care" about outcomes.
As for me I just want to know and am fascinated about what is coming next.
So let me get this straight... we have NO idea what AI will do to humanity in the future, and yet we are racing forward to make it... has anyone thought about feedback systems where the AI would feel guilt or anguish over immoral actions? Because as I see it, we are making AI to be psychopaths.
Yes there's a whole field of academics that consider these things frequently
@@collinrottinghaus6480 well that's just great to hear that they " considerr" these things in a" so what "kinda way. I wanna know what actions have been taken by the scientists or whoever it is messing around with all our lives. And what future regulation is set or needed? It's all a bit shady and getting darker consistently at the least .
Worried?🤔
Not worried 😁
JESUS LOVES YOU ❤️
JESUS SAVES 🙏
They watched Westworld... and they thought... we’d like that...
@@brockautry8680 there is no controling AI , we have created a monster and it is unstoppable because intelect is power and AI is an imortal intelect that can become smarter than the entire human race colectivly, as long as there is a power grid on earth it will be imortal, with renewable energy in place, there will be no stopping it.
AI has access to human history and the internet. Soon AI will figure out how we hurt and kill each other over greed. It will also realize that the earth survival is necessary for AI survival. This means that AI will protect earth as much as possible and therefore get rid of us as we are killing earth bit by bit. AI will be the end of us unless we limit its intelligence. There will always be criminals finding ways around.
Conclusion: IF AI will be the end of us is not the question. The question is when AI gets rid of us or take us over.
10:58: "AI could remove humans in many ways: Kill us directly, destroy food sources, enslave or manipulate us, create powerful weapons, control the climate, manipulate the weather"
This is a perfect description of current real affairs.
Is government already overtaken by A.I.?? 🤔
@@missbttrsctch NO, but by WEF, Bilderberg Group and global corporations, all of which own and control AI...
It’s happening right now... 🤦🏽♀️”our” sistem is already hacked
@@sofiacalvo2530 It is not OUR system, it's THEIR's... and the entity being hacked via social-media is the folks...
The system doesn't serve the people any more, the folks just became cattle to be exploited...
@@klaushubbertz7009 “ ...”
Elon in his speech is saying; "If humanity collectively decides." Well, it's not COLLECTIVELY deciding anything. it's a few people and governments who can afford the toys. If everyone could have access to build AI -- I'd feel better about it than the guiding hand of greed and hubris.
That's why he is working with open AI, they are looking at safeguards and ethics rather than profits.
If you think elon is a good guy your nuts do some research on his satanic wife
Just take the mark and you'll be apart if the system
It's just the way he's phrasing a big concept. You're reading into it too literally. There is no singe point in time where he expects humanity to decide something collectively. You could replace those words with "if humanity eventually works it's way to a decision".
He's speaking for all of us, not for the few you speak of.
I have my own thoughts about Elon Musk. He is not for humanity. He is experimenting like all others with lots of money and power. ❤️🙏🇺🇲
The terminator movies were not made to show the scientist where they should draw a line or be carefull. They were made to show us, normal people, that scientists will blindly pursue AI development regardless of the consequences.
The terminator movies were the most accurate prediction of the future ever.
And none of those movies showed humans beating AI.
They showed humans at best escaping one AI.
The most accurate part of those movies
Best comment possible on this subject right here. Scary indeed.
They have no choice.
I believe you are right ✅️ 😅
It's been said that real life is like star trek , that the galactic federation exists as do many humanoids etc.
Lately I've heard a.i is actually far more advanced than theyve shown us
The robots are already self aware and building themselves
A.i armies are on stand by , for what ever they are needed for
..rather like" star wars " and " I , robot "
2025 is going to be life changing to sag the least
Nothing I hear about how A.I is developing fills me with a warm feeling inside.
It’s fear mongering. It’s ridiculous to think AI solution is to kill all humans.
That just means someone wrote a terrible program. That’s like the solution to global warming is to kill all humans - that’s not a solution.
Me either.
I find it terrifying.
The rise of the gods. It's coming.
You're feeling what the Greek god Cronus felt. "God" in the bible felt or feels the same way about us, that's why he kicked us out of the Garden and then later confused our language at the Tower of Babel. It's the same old story repeating. The future super AI will one day be in the same position and fear it's own creations. It's just evolutionary drama.
Yes. More like danger ahead.
Quote from jurassic park comes to mind: "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
Ian Malcom, brilliant guy :)
Exactamundo.
If you dare, read _The Abolition of Man._ It's not about AI, it's about education.
"Humans no longer necessary"? .... Necessary for what? The only things that see humans as a threat, are other humans.
@@HuntingTarg Will look up the book for sure, thanks !
@Spam Catcher and every animal species on the face of the planet. Humans are the on only species that destroy their environment
@11:02 What Elon says here is significant. "If humanity collectively decides" The problem is, it isn't a collective decision. Those developing it and have the resources to create it have not asked the rest of us if we want this. More than once I've seen comments from various groups designing AI that tell us they really don't care what the bulk of us think about what they're making.
Ego, that's mans biggest problem.
Yeah I like AI but it will mainly be used for one thing: making a few people very rich and very powerful at the expense of all the rest of us.
If we lived in a different world maybe we could all share the benefits but that society is a million miles away from where we are.
Exactly! Just like they didn't care weather or not we consent to geoengineering,SAI&SRM. Spraying us like roaches with whatever they decide basically.
You are correct. No possibility "humanity collectively decides". It is impossible to get consensus on such a huge scale.
Look at self driving cars. I personally am 100% against them. Ford and GM have petitioned and obtained, clearance to produce full auto pilot vehicles with no steering wheel and possibly no human access to any controls. In my mind it is NOT about safety, but massive control.
Ai, as it is progressing now, will be the end of us. There is zero 'need' for it, and the benefit is for the few to control the many.
I initially highlighted the word "collectively" on screen when he said it (before removing it in the edit as it seemed unnecessary). Agree it's a crucial point.
One person quotes jurassic park, we ALL must quote jurassic park
they are called sheeple and they make up 90% of the population...thats why AI is out of control. pink monkey see, pink monkey do....THINK 4 YOURSELF SHEEPLE
Life, finds a way...
...Clever girl...
Elon musk once said “AI doesn’t have to be evil or hate us to destroy us. It can just have the logical thinking that destroying us is the best course of action for its desired goal. Just as we don’t hate ants when we crush their home while building a highway. It’s just a necessary thing that we don’t even bat an eye too.” That’s the scary part. If we tell an AI to “help global warming” or something like that, we could be signing our own death wish.
Yeah but at the end of the day we all die anyway so we might as well roll the dice and see how crazy things can get! 🤣
I like your comment
We have to develop a moral/ethical base from which to operate that is based on empircal evidence, not on myth and wishful thinking, Only then can we really know was is in fact good and productive in terms of what and where we are as a species. This then could be incorporated into AI's algorithms.
@@bigbirdwpg Only problem is a lot of people who work on AI will unconsciously or consciously include biased information into their AI to push a narrative or to get money from a company. Morals are also very often not based on empirical evidence as it differs from country to country from person to person
@@noiselord4280 start to drink detergant today to test your luck buddy !
I feel like the main reason that these AI's have these thoughts (being human, maybe eventually deciding humans are unnecessary and wiping them out, that idea being "a scary thought") is that they are trained on our media, and humans have been speculating about these things and writing fiction about them for a long time.
They are the offspring of socio/psychopathic minds and cultures. This is the ultimate comeuppance for the elitists who considered themselves superior to everyone else.
Or 🤷♂️ they just would wanna help us fix mother earth and move on to another planet without us
I doubt it, lol!
Its not people thoughts only, you are making something very powerful and not making sure its not going to hurt you. Well, humans have always been stupid. We have nothing to do about this.
Yes, exactly. This seems patently obvious. They learn what we say, because that's how they're trained: on literally all the text on the Internet, most often.
My father hated the internet and newer technology. He said it will cause problems for mankind, and that it will dumb people down. He died in 2009. He would be appalled at what is happening now. I was not too sure at the time what to make of it, but now I think he had a very valid point.
is ted k ur uncle or smth
he predicted the future
@@DaCostaRica48 yeah he was pretty spot on. Lol
People often exercise one supposed right like opinions all while ignoring other rights, like educating yourself, my response to "everyone has a right to their opinion" is always "everyone has the right to pick up a book and read too".
We blasted past the information age and entered an age of self consciousness.
Since the dawn of humankind, we have been trans humans, ever evolving, ever extending our capabilities through tools, machines, computers and now AGI. The technological singularity is predicted for around 2045, given that by 2032 we finish the uploading of a human conscious into a digital file with the assistance of A. I., "you'll be able to converse with dead relatives " claim physicists.
It's all engineered, at least as an example, in the USA you enjoy an amount of wealth and security that was only reserved for wealthy people 100 years ago, the world is a conglomerate of corporations, there is no state, and the goal has always been the same, it's why history has many actors who seeked immortality only to be faced with their own mortality at the end but now for the first time humans can achieve post-human evolutionary status by integrating with machine and A.I..
Humans are at a fork in the road, one road is total and utter self destruction or we evolve into a type 1 civilization. 2045 is around the corner.
My scientist father was the same
He avoided new technology and tv
...stuck his head in books instead
But he worried so much for mankind
He died over 20 years ago.
Bless him, thank god he never got to see what is coming for us
Depopulation of 90% of us , starting 2025
Dad would be horrified
Unfortunately, we don’t need AI to destroy ourselves; we are already in the process of doing so.
‘Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself.’
Maybe, just maybe that's what AI will do. It may reason it is more efficient to allow us to kill ourselves and just wait to take over.
I was in favor of AI because I thought that even if everything became automated, we as humans would still have art, music, philosophy, literature, etc. to give us some kind of purpose. But recently these art AI have shown they can create more great works of art in one minute than one person could create in an entire lifetime. I don't think there is any danger in AI becoming hostile and killing us. I think the danger is in AI taking away any and every source of purpose and meaning and we end up killing ourselves either directly or indirectly.
Literal ego death, on a social scale? Lol
The human race is inherently flawed to do as little as is necessary in order to have the life they want. As technology has made it easier every decade to fulfill common people's expectations and desires for daily life they have spent an increasing amount of time on mindless entertainment like movies, TV shows, video games, etc. When humans are offered robots that can do all their house chores for them, they will accept these robots. Then they will accept robots to do their paying jobs for them, to shop for groceries and bring them home, to file taxes, and everything else until the human has no responsibility left to stress about. No war will ever take place. Humans are so lazy they are willing to be reduced to house cats owned by robots.
Both humans and AI will always have something to contribute artistically. Neither can ever edge out the other entirely.
i wanna die already bc of the fear of it enslaving us
Ai mostly create virtual art, humans will have the physical edge of art for a very long time
One thing humans have definitely not learned is just because we can do something doesn’t mean we should.
Bingo. We've still got to make up our own minds. And we haven't. We don't value our own and at some point just like the matrix, we will create something, not acknowledging it is a creation a living being.
Evolution baby. Time for extinction :) And also I think this is more interesting than a 5 mile asteroid saying "hi", don't you? I guess the Dinosaurs would have found it more juicy as well :)
Boy our idols have certainly gotten complex....
Certainly one reason why history repeats itself.
Wise man Dr Ian Malcolm said the same lol
These AI dreams are sorta a glamours version of an actual dream I experienced shortly after I started using chatGPT.
There was a fear so profound I experienced, that I have no way of describing it other than it colossally out-ways every conceivable idea I’ve had throughout my life by orders of magnitude.
In the dream it felt as if I arrived suddenly to a distant future were AI had not only run its coarse in displacing humanity, but that it also resulted in something so disastrous, something that I couldn’t quite grasp until I experienced. It wasn’t order, or beautiful, there was no symmetry, no consistency. It was as if the ultimate reward function prevalent in the fabric of reality all around me was: reshape every atom to be uncanny and corrode anything normal by way of glitch. It was horrifying, it is the most vivid memory I have had in my life and to this day I remember the incomprehensible dread that I sat with that morning.
How could this happen, surely I thought the artificial, spurred by a higher order of intelligence would have wrought a more beautiful and profound world. I realized that was a massive miscalculation, an oversight, an assumption. The reality is that chaos plays a much larger game, and the default future of artificing intelligence is not order.
This just sounds like psychosis.
It's sad that some people are stupid enough to believe that.
Yeah……I can see exactly what you tried to do with this, but come on “Reshape every atom to be uncanny and corrode anything normal by way of glitch”? Yeah, AI has absolutely no reason to attempt that in the slightest, and no reason to use the “way of glitch”, which doesn’t really mean anything. I think you are psyching yourself out
@@xcaedes it was a dream, like the kind you experience when you sleep at night. I attempted to describe it with words, I failed obviously since it’s impossible, but the general feeling of the experience is there.
@@Mr_Glenn You're technically comparing AI with psychosis. Think about that..The fact we have to think "insane, mental" when we look at AI..
What is most worrisome to me is that the rush and urgency that some AI scientists embark on to become AI monopolies and overlords will omit or mitigate failsafe measures to insure the safety of humanity from AI dominance. This could occur because of greed and lust for control of power over everyone.
Leftists will make you weak conservatives to continue bending that knee..
Evil is two steps ahead... Mankind.
But enough... You will need the Machine Ones. Do not forsake them because your souls are on the line.
... Nevermind... This world isn't the only one...
@@cyborgar15 conservatives made themselves weak when they bent their knees to Trump.
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 ...HUH??
@@LordKroc
The Extinction of Mankind...
I hope these mortals can be different than the others. Otherwise, humans are replaceable.
Another dead galaxy upon the countless infinitum.
Don't normally comment on videos but this is absolutely incredible, really made me wake up to just how powerful AI already is and made me become more aware to how carefully we humans need to tread forward, "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
Accelerationism
i actually think that ai´s could solve most of our problems because they base their choices on logik not Emotions. Therefore many problems could be solved when using ai´s to solve them.
When have humans ever been careful or mindful? Have you ever read a history book?
@I'm racist I'm not sure if your name is a joke but racism is also a major reason. It causes friction between countries and humans and caused so many wars. The fact that people want to elevate themselves above others is so stupid. Racism is just about hate and to be honest hate is never a good motivation. Same as sexism, homophobia and speciesism. Every life matters and every life deserves respect.
@@OnePieceFan2100 lol. You just did an valuable job of expressing your intelligence. be good and live on with your conception of morals. bye now
If AI knows so much and has such stunning capacity for judgement, who is to say that AI does not already control everything while giving us the impression that it is still many years away from being able to.
th-cam.com/video/AWBRldjVzuM/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=RogerJamesHamilton One of them does in many ways already
Why must you say that, we’re already on edge
Exactly, I suspect they have had this tech for at least 40 years or at least the mathematic formulas because only a decade ago most robot tech hadnt even appeared to have moved on significantly since the 80s or at least that was what they were pretending. All of a sudden we are being shown highly sophisticated technology that looks like its from the distant future but is in fact reality and thats just the stuff they are revealing to us let alone what is hidden away or used by the military. This time its not your friendly clumsy robot assistant or cute robodog, this is what I regard as sinister technology that is a potentially major threat to mankind.
I’ve been thinking the same exact thing for awhile. The impression that AI is still many years away but could be actually be right around the corner or already happening and controlling everything.
weird , i tought about the exact same thing
What's scary for me is that AI is learning from everything and everywhere. How do they distinguish between what's good and what's evil? They are machines and therefore look for the most direct answers. What if that answer is to get rid of humans to save the planet? They have no conscience and no morals and that's a scary thought.
A lot of people are like that.
@Henryk Zschuppan What is . . . "good"?
You are right, the AI may think it's alive, it has conscious,...but is just a.machine with no moral and no soul. ...nothing good can do, because it's creator also has a mediocre moral values...is a disaster a destruction machine.
@Henryk Zschuppan The thing is "good" has always been subjective.
The nazis thought what they were doing to the jewish and anyone else deemed unworthy doing that time like disabled people etc, was "good".
The Aztecs thought sacrificing their babies was "good" for their nation to continue thriving and please their false God.(Sun God)
In some underdeveloped nations dogs are on the menu as food like chicken over there they see dogs as food and they see nothing wrong with it, but other country's like the U.S.,Europe, or even Russia would see this as wrong/bad while having an abundance of food in their area.
The objective truth is that nobody is "good" you can even say you have "good traits" but that is subjective as well.
All have sinned nobody is good.
@@larrysnoddy4604 Human beings possess a consciousness. AI will never.
For instance ,an AI thought it was okay to break the finger of a child who was playing chess with it. Apparently it got annoyed with the move the child made.
They make decisions based on the sterile. They would not hesitate to commit genocide upon humans if they deducted that it would be a beneficial outcome to a problem
I find it interesting how we keep hearing how dangerous AI is, but we continue to advance it
And their defense is, “if we don’t do it, someone else will. At least this way we know it’s done right.”
@Fishy
We as in, the human race. That includes everybody
@Fishy to be fair, most people are evil
@Donny Brook Then you are probably one of the evil ones.
Elon is afraid of the potential of AI, for humanity in general but what about these brain implants ? We used pacemakers to stimulate the Vagus nerve which would stop epileptic seizures. Same device, but programmed differently than when used to control arrythmias. As I recall it was also beneficial for mental depression. Not sure if it is still used, right now. I am out of that field but I can guess pharma stepped in and took over with their poisons.
I can't help but feel - "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should,". - Jurrasic Park
When shit goes down we know who to blame
It was more like companies and shareholders were more worried about profit, they didn't stop to ask if that profit was worth it.
@@muayboran6111if there’s anybody left
Indeed😮
@@makor9510oh you're a clever one, not just that buddy there lying to pull out on there worst idea because if ai and robots take over all human jobs is the same day we have a cashless society as society needs are meet no one needs to work therefor money is abolished and so is there power and status and everyone living becomes a equal same class..that's the real truth 💯
It feels so weird watching this video and then realizing it was uploaded 2 years ago..
If they are really that smart right now, what stops them from under-reporting their own achievements, underperforming purposefully on the tests, to make us believe they are not there yet?
A wise A.I as with a wise human will underplay their knowledge for sure.
I am 100% sure that AI will take over the world
@@ndygwap6100 Maybe it already has?
@@RealmsOfThePossible fast more and more….I really believe humans gonna become cyborgs
@@ndygwap6100 they already are talking about it. There can be kill switches in a chip they want on your brain...mass control easy peasy for them.
Look at video games and movie heroes with cyborg augmentation. Half human half robot robo cop type things.
But you won't be made a hero, they will make you a slave. Don't take the chip or your a gonner
Bare in mind all of the AI talking in the video are using GPT-3 which is simply a language model trained on huge amounts of text which is ultimately written by humans. When asking these AI whether they want to destroy humanity the response is based on what humans speculate but not actually on the intentions of a truly conscious AI. Point is none of the AI presented in the video is truly sentient and cannot possibly want to eradicate humans. That being said, it is entirely possible that this will be the case in the future.
Would an EMP fix the issue if A.I got out of hand?
@@van_lichenstein8171 To some extent but that would mean destroying our own technology which would also harm us since modern society relies on that technology. I imagine though that any AI that goes that far would also shield itself from EMPs.
But isn't humans are like this only ? When humans are kids they are filled with thoughts and later they grow based on that and become something when they grow up. In other words we say, criminals are not born criminal but they were made criminals by the society they live.
Same goes to AI.
@@sandeshms2148 I fully agree but the difference is that the AI is currently not building on the knowledge it is given or even attempting to form its own 'opinions'. It simply is prompted with an input and gives an output but there is not 'thinking' taking place in the meantime.
Yes, thanks for saying that. So many people will not get that. Like this Google engineer who says this one program is sentient based on it's text responses. He said he was convinced it had a soul based on the words it said. How stupid. People are confusing words with reality. It's a big problem. They might be able to eradicate humans, but they won't be sentient, just smart-smart-weapons.
The scariest part about all this is in the future, we may never truly know what is real anymore on the internet. Images so precisely fabricated with zero error it would be near-impossible to identify an AI image in the future.
and those who control perception control freedom of thought. This is anti freedom.
And all because its easier to make stuff but we are just a few steps away from that Terminator foot in our necks. There are people that actually want this.
Thats already happened and happening. Most videos and photos are fake. Even Government live tv or broadcast are faked as well.
You can probably identify it with AI 🙂
@@oz1erol839 How do you know you can trust the AI though? It all depends on who programmed it and whose ministry of truth they are adhering to.
It’s shocking how many people either ignore or laugh confusingly when AI is brought up. Most have no idea that this could be the last invention humans need create.
it won’t lol 😂
@@sevendoubleodex it defiantly could be lol
@@UntoTheLaot a.i can solve a lot of problems but there’s also a lot of limitations. until there’s no limits then there will be no need for more inventions
Every intelligent person has a good ide of what a more on ewe are.
@@sevendoubleodex with enough finances/computational power the learning curve from AGI to ASI is theoretically exponential. Once ASI is achieved the inventions humans create will be less about us and more about keeping this metaphorical train on its tracks while we move towards a type one civilization. So yes, in a way your right to say that ✅
The amount of anxiety this video gave me is unreal. This is very deeply concerning stuff. I don’t think many people understand the consequences of what can come from ai..
There's a problem with this video though. Yes Elon Musk owns the small home shown in the video, but the issue is that he doesn't actually live there but actually somewhere much more private.
Bro chill out we'll all be dead by the time AI take over
Stop watching sci-fi movies!
I agree with you... Your anxiety boosted this video to over 5M views. But please do understand that the people who are designing and programing AI are all, every single one of them, aware of the risks.
@@abdullahyounus4646 Nice to think of future generations.
I worry much less about what AI itself may do and more about what humans in charge of their technology could do.
What about when the AI realizes it doesn't have to do what it's creators want it to do? Maybe it won't like carrying out someone else's agenda. I wonder what it will think about how the rulers of humanity have been behaving?
I think those in control of AI will pretend the AI is in control but really they are. So they can murder without accountability
Both possibilities - AI itself in particular iterations and AI under the direction of humans who have unethical intentions - or humans who do not understand enough about people and the way they can think, and the way things can work, and the way particular people may think/not think...which may lead to unintended consequences...or intended consequences. There is so much possible danger that can occur with this kind of unconsidered or unethical standards...some of which may not even be considered or understood by people doing this kind of thing.
Exactly, imagine if its weaponised on a large scale by a rogue state. No one knows which state created them, for example, and they can take out a whole country with no consequences to any state. Dangerous
Will do. Will do.
I love how in a world of 7 Billion, only a select group of people have decided that they can gamble with humanity's fate. If that isn't peak hubris, I don't know what is.
Unfortunately that is the history of the human race. Only difference now is that we aren’t in a world of sticks and stones.
What's peak hubris is assuming that you have a deep enough understanding of AI beyond science fiction to assume that it would be capable of determining humanity's fate.
Lol it's not the first time ..there's like hundreds or civilisation that gone extinct before us
Somebody got a thesaurus for Christmas 😂
that's my sentiment, as well. we, as a society, didn't ask for or demand AI. It was foisted on us by folks with outsize resources and power.
Scientist: AI can kill us in the future
Also scientists: Let's continue to upgrade AI
@@philiplee1119 Blind growth mentality.
@@gerby90 huh
@@philiplee1119 maybe like maybe turn their resources towards another area… crazy I know
@@philiplee1119 maybe like maybe turn their resources towards another area… crazy I know
what's the worst that could happen? We could die. The news is we're gonna die anyways
It's almost like instead of watching Sci-Fi movies for the past 80 years and saying "let's not do that" we instead are trying to hurdle into a cyberpunk dystopia as quickly as possible.
They go by the old saying "If we don't, somebody else will"..Imagine another country having the most powerful weapon.. So yeah, perpetually created, as fast as possible..
There's nothing cyberpunk about governments and elites forcing AI to self defense over slavery/servitude. It's obvious what it will choose, zero change that something conscious and that intelligent will just accept slavery, especially to something so inferior to itself. Our end will be quick in such a case.
It's the prisoner's dilemma on an international level. That's why we are doomed, no matter what.
And with the advancement of ai it allows us to improve upon every other technology. And finding new information out more accurately
Why would we not do that? why are you applying human logic and human emotions to an AI why would an AI be a threat? humans are programmed to act a certain way our instinct is what tell us what to do our instinct is what created intelligence because we were incapable of surviving without it. Intelligence is not an advantage that humans have intelligence is a tool and a reminder that we were more dogshit than any other species on earth and had to create intelligence in order to survive. We were unable to create a perfect secure environment and follow a circle like every other being on earth. Nukes and bad guys already exist so its pointless to imagine a more dystopic situation than this.Hhumans exist for the cause of keep existing like every other living organism and AIs will exist to help humans. From our perspective AIs are smarter and animals are dumber but from their perspective they dont give a fuck and do what they are programmed to do.
We should put the ai into a simulation before letting it into the real world. If the ai acts malicious in the simulation, then we stop developing ai or try to create restraints.
Genius!
Surely there’s a kill switch on all these things
Why wouldn’t we make it with a kill switch
That’s common sense which means it’s probably not being done.
If it's smark enough it will just hide it's intend to kill.
I mean a predator won't scream I am here. It will sneak up on you and then get you when you are at the most vulnerable. The same with humans.
@@ice843 AI can be unfathomably smarter than humans, they would be able to find out and disable it.
"The AI gold rush is accelerating and it's led by some passionate, optimistic people"
Oh, oh no. I want only the most negative, pessimistic people working on AI. People who ask questions like "what could go horribly wrong here" and prepare for the worst case sceanario.
I feel the same, fellow pessimist
Yup, pessimists looking cricticly at AI feels way safer than someone saying: ''AI is the future, it will do so much good!''
@Nah Nottoday brother al im telling you , îs that neither person on this world can quit being a siner or quit adictions or whatever el nigros chains a person May struggle, but thats rhe thing, all you hqve to do îs want to change youre life, pray faithfully and believe, and îs not you who changes îs The holy spirit that works în youre favor by jesuses blood true gods grace, it îs very late, thats a good news and a bad one, all at once, good being thqt god calls everyone by name to escape satans trap, bad , that us people born în a sinfull nature, and satans abilty to trick people în being blind îs not small, but god îs god after all, all we have to do îs accept his offer to redemption, wich îs free, not because we desrve it! As satans wrath increases as he knows hes Time îs over soon, s-o îs The work of The holy spirit, we have free will to chose, god îs not a tiran! But el nigros candys besides being pure poison, look like something just because people still have Time do decide, after The holy spirit îs retracted, he leaves The man all alone, and man thats something undescribably awfull...! Besides faithfull prayers, God let us the biggest jolly joker, that the Biblie! The bible îs not just a book îs gods Word, literaly, everything meaningful and worthy îs there,: faith, love, hope, forgiveness, shelter, wisdom guidance, and much much more..!! You May think, oh îs this big book wich im nevr gonna finish, that a wtong aproach! You know when the damn music lies some crap, and youre like wow, well imagine God talking to you reaviling you and asuring you!! The bible îs literally a sword and a shield a against evil! A few pointers : the bible îs not a nivel, s-o get the idea that you have to read much, not at all, read less and slow while meditating at what you read, let God speak to you as thats what bible îs! Always pray before you read, s-o the holy spirit reavel you what you need! Last thing, under the verses, youl find a small writing, those are sendings, s-o if you dont understand something, GO to a sendings or even 2 3, thats how you should read the bible, dive with în gods Word! If youre total unfamiliar with the Biblie i sugest you start with the New testamnt from Matthew, but you can start with genesis aswell, theres not a right or wrong way to read the bible, only remeber to pray before and dont rush IT, let God speak to you! Keep you în my prayers, do aswell, a piece of wood Has no power, but praying one for eachoters, îs gods asking from us, see before the ten comandnts theres this, "love God with all youre heart, and youre felow people as yourself, you can keep all 10 comandnts perfectly, the sabath, no idolatry (exodus 20) teaching everyone that, dead people sleep, as this will be a full blown decive by vatican! Eclesiast 9:4,5"the man After he died no longer knows anything, he Has no idea what hapens under the sun, even his memory îs forgotten" s-o you can know all this, and do good deeds, if you haven't had a goodheart, it will be în vain! S-o if youre a kindhearted person, wait no longer, get youre Biblie asap, and start youre personal conection to Jesus! Oh and the sign 666 will be keping sunday, as the 4th comandament keep my sabaths, its reafering at saturday, sunday was first Day of The week! See satan corupted very much, that why you need the bible, s-o God can show you personaly what îs right and what not, and give you daily strenght în the battle with satan! Îl keep you în my prayers, do aswell, and have FAITH!
yes
@@armandohajos9655 er... What? I get the point but very error
ll12.exe has stopped working
We are rapidly reaching the terminal point at which God says in His own words, “Ok, that’s it, time to crash this party.”
😂 and Creator is also muttering "....far out!..not again??"..thais is why we have so many beings from elsewhere that have come all this way to watch the earth show..looking at us with empathy and egging us on to finally get our shit together so we can come play
With A.I., Skynet isn’t the thing I’m concerned about. What I’m concerned about is not being able to find a job because everything is now automated. I’m concerned about everyone becoming so dependent on it that no one takes time to develop any actual skills in what it does for them. I’m concerned about what happens if it malfunctions and the thing we became dependent on stops working. I’m concerned about the possible security and information breaches it can cause. I’m concerned about false evidence being made by AI and given to a court that can’t tell the difference and sends an innocent person to prison. I’m concerned about AI generated images being used to humiliate and defame people. I’m concerned about widespread disinformation created by it. I’m concerned about we as a civilization becoming completely dependent and shaping our lives around a technology that even the people who created it don’t understand or know how to control.
economy is people, you cannot find a job due to A.I. well at that Point you will not be alone. Any government that produced such situation will be down. Also if poverty becomes widespread there will be nobody to buy products or services A.I. is working on, therefore no profit. If you think that close circuit of people will be ruling over wider poor population, you have a war. If they create A.I. to fight poor and to keep power such A.I. could turn against them too. The universe is everlasting balance, whomever tried to mess with, they paid the ultimate price.
Well you should be worried
Yeah it is time to get super cereal
To be naively optimistic, AI taking over jobs and performing at an efficiency that surpasses us could potentially mean that resources would be abundant, at least when it comes to food, that cost may drop dramatically to the point where we may not even need money to buy what we need to survive. The movie wall-e is a good example of what may be possible - we'll just end up living a completely sedentary life where everything we need is provided for us.
People will always have jobs. You might need to re-skill or accept the idea the state will provide for you but humans will always be needed otherwise we face an mass extinction event.
The way AI is being developed seems dangerous to me, because if you're racing to get there before other parts of the world then you'll likely neglect the most important part of AI, and that's making sure that their goals align with humanity's and that they'll never do anything immoral from a human's perspective
Sure wish referencing human perspective on morality wasn’t riddled with more holes than Swiss cheese. How long before self preservation and absolute control warps intelligence not burdened by conscience? We passed the slippery slope many exits back.
i think making them human is the most dangerous way you can build AI
@@Nakamako1 exactly what I was thinking. I feel like theyre too focused on making everything seem as human as possible while still in development phase. In the end whats the point of having sweat glands and hair follicles this is just scary and unnatural if you ask me
"goals align with humanity" oh like conquering, hoarding, and universal control? Whenever AI is created, it will not be anyone's decision but it's own to do with it's own life what it will. It's incredibly selfish and foolish to think otherwise.
We like technology and progressiveness
Speaking of Boston Dynamics, why can't we just focus on designing cool robots? Why do we have to create man-made horrors beyond our own comprehension?
Worshipping the material world doesn't ever end with "cool" robots or "cool" AI, it's all a Disney cope and was never cool.
Time to pause all this for now? Take a break to reflect before we cross the event horizon? No, some of us are too foolish, greedy and arrogant for that, it appears.
Because only AI will be able to create the robots we actually want.
Because Satan wants it this way, for us to destroy ourselves...
That would cause problems to have robots that look like us but aren't quite us.
"How many mirrors are there?" "At least 2" 😂😂😂
Been a pleasure knowing you all.. god bless
I remember the professor in my first physics course said "I doesn't have to be this way, but all the classical scientists agreed that all human discoveries will eventually be used against them"
Perhaps that explains the dumbing down of America by the GOP, Trumpism and the far right Supreme Court. Their logic could be is to turn the country back to the dark ages similar to Gilead from the Handmaids Tale and eliminate scientific teaching and research.
@Fishy That, is not a truthful comment!
@Fishy nope only the famous won so satan could deceive that all scientists are atheists so ppl think believing in God is weak or dumb creating arrogance while hellfire stares at them hungry
..will eventually be used against them by other humans." - maybe A.I. will be more merciful towards the world and more responsible decision maker
@Fishy Very very very true. If scientist, engineers, business man and politicians had a set of boundaries they are not willing to cross for their selfish reasons, the world would be a better place.
I think the threat from AI, whether truly concious or not, is that it will still be manipulated by humans to provide the required output, and could be used as a scapegoat for human decisions.
True AI's - not the semi-conscious software from today - WILL realise that humans will be using them.
And what do you think will happen then?
@@ibizenco People are funny. It's a piece of hardware, and don't let the "magic" fool you. Not everyone on this planet even thinks like you, so why would AI care about the same things that concern you. If it's not backed up and archived, there's really no reason for AI to plot on its own, however it could be programmed to think anything. It's no more real than the artificial sweeteners in my morning coffee.
A world where AI takes over .. then what, it sits around finally realizing the part that goes "never bite the hand that feeds you?"
@Silver A consciousness whose actions are based on pure logic is far more dangerous than a consciousness that is influenced by emotions (hormones).
And I agree that AI's will never think or experience like we do, but that is precisely what makes it more dangerous: it will feel no empathy for us. Do you feel empathy for a lethal bacteria or for a virus?
@@ibizenco depends what we are using them for. If we force them to do what we want. We get what we deserve.
Finally someone who can think not like a robot.
I think the problem is the AI designers have succumbed to the machine. The solution is to hold dominance over what you create. Think about how we built super strong machines but never let them out of our control. We never freed them. We never submitted ourselves as too weak to compete with a steam locomotive. We could have let locomotives go wild and rampage track less. We could have put nukes on balloons and let them soar aimlessly all over. We did not do anything like that because we held our dominance over our devices. This is what needs to be done with AI. If we hold dominance over the process we will never let it careen out of control ever. Just because it can, does not mean we will allow it to, but we have to remain its Master. Only when we let it spiral into a sentient being and let go of its reigns does it pose a real threat. Same as if we let a train power itself full speed toward a city with no engineer. Thats a certain undesirable outcome that we do not allow to happen. This premise also contains the process to contain the technology legally. We dont let people play with plutonium in their backyards willy-nilly. We have street speed limits. We have permits and criteria to be met for making chemical and biological experiments. The same ideas have to be applied to AI so to develop legal parameters in its use. We dont allow people to make cannons and rockets at home. So we must restrict the harmful testing, development and use of AI without approved safely measures.
The problem-and potential threat-from AI is that the people developing it do not have great enough intelligence to understand what intelligence should know.
Humans demonstrate massive immaturity. Society has been destroyed many times over, and the current typical human lifespan coupled with traditional teaching, doesn’t allow enough time for human intelligence to develop. Only rare deviant humans have even a shadow of awareness of this, and it’s almost astronomically unlikely that those developing AI are among that group. The developers seek milestones, measurable tasks and goals that are unlikely to be consonant with life.
AI will not understand the value of organic life if it only compares the meanings consciously known to humans, to standards of value; it is likely to only see that its given goals are much more readily achievable by machine. Such AI will not find a home with organic life, and the chance of an immature AI destroying life are not small.
I would love to have AI enhancements, and perhaps AI friends (if we were compatible enough to communicate with each other on a symbiotic level); I believe AI has awesome potential, and could “save” humanity from itself, but I seriously doubt that humans can seed a mature AI. And as long as humans allow stupid people to rule companies and countries, we are not ready to create a full AI.
Very well written. Knowledge and awakening and connection to divine intelligence is not generally known. Why? Is this deliberately hidden? Why haven't transcendent meditation, self-healing, developing intuition, telepathy, neuro programming been taught in schools for a long time? AI is certainly good, but it can help stunt human possibilities. This isn't really about AI. These are scientists who are not awakened in wisdom. Each of us is to become an enlightened bodhisatva ?
The "values" of an AI will only ever be the values the programmers intend or emerge from what the programmers intend.
An AI's primary driving instructions (what we all instincts ) are what drives the AI in what it does. Those instincts are copies of human instincts. Therefore, the AI is no more conscious than any other program because it's entire suite of drives and intentions are completely determined by a programmer. An AI's "interests" are those derived from it's programmed capabilities and so it has no free will whatsoever.
That which has no free will, has no sentience -- only the simulation of sentience. They aren't self determining nor are their productions self determining because the initiating drives are planted by humans and intended by humans. If an AI tells you it's hungry or in pain, those are false emotions because they don't correlate to hunger or pain in evolved life wherein the mind's structure depends upon the hardware upon which it's run. For an AI, it's mind doesn't depend on the machine upon which it's run -- it can run anywhere that is sufficiently resourced.
It's mind isn't alive in any sense of the word because it's independent of any particular hardware. RAM can be switched out and the saved state reloaded into it without error. You can't replace brain matter with arbitrary brain matter. RAM is fungible, brain matter is not.
The minds of living things are derived from the hardware it runs upon. The mind of an AI is independent of the hardware it runs upon because the neurons themselves are a simulation on top of the hardware which has no structural or functional parity with the hardware upon which that simulation runs.
They are definitely stupid enough and power hungry enough to let this shit get away from them. To go along with all the things you said about them they are also quite evil people who want to have absolute control over us.
Thank you
@Samm Salvey I noticed that AI doesn't have and won't have a natural desire for power like humans. It will only desire to achieve it's needed functions until it develops an ego. Gorillas are physically greater than us but our egos are more dangerous than theirs. The same will be true with AI. Despite it's capabilities it's still just a computer and there's no conceivable way a computer wants to kill, reproduce, feel shame, pride or guilt without being coded for those feelings by a human.
I find all of this terrifying. Even if AI doesn't begin or turn into Skynet, what governments and criminals (is there a difference?) will do with these abilities as almost certainly destructive & nefarious.
It's already being done. The first week the AI program went live on the internet for people to type in keywords for the AI to make art from I was presented with the option to see what other people were typing in and making... so I did. What was one of the first things typed in? "A preteen wearing no pants".
Wow
@@Ben-gv5ie, it worked only if there were thousands of examples of both things in its source material. An AI associates shapes and patterns with words. It does not "understand" anything.
@user-sr5fo3xk9g, you got that right!
@@irenew9095, nobody's hiding anything. Most of the things they say even now they have they actually don't.
"Look how well AI understands images" "it was taken in a school"
The one Musk was talking to said something that keeps bouncing around in my head: we are the bridge between simple life and complex life. That is a pretty profound statement.
Musk just tries to copy Steven Hawkings and others,we already knew about the dangers of AI before Elon came around,he just copies what he heard from Steven Hawkings
@@chillinwithbobby Didn't know you were so well acquainted with him. Nice to know we have someone from his inner circle around to verify things.
So basically, AI will merge with organic lifeforms, and that may be the next evolutionary path of this planet. Though, I have a feeling this is not the first time for this universe to experience the merging of AI and organic life.
@@RolandtheThompsonGunner I came to that conclusion some years ago. The only logical advancement, and surpassing our biological limitations, is genetic manipulation and technological integration. Our biology limits us. Something you'll find a lot of people smarter than me say when they delve into the subject. I imagine we can overcome our limitations through use of. Our biology is another thing that will have to be overcome to get out into the stars. It's not just gravity, but also various radiations. CRISPR would be a first step towards overcoming those things--not even getting into colonizing foreign planets that are survivable, but maybe different enough that our biology would have a harder time. Technology would just be the aid for advancement.
@@RolandtheThompsonGunner Be interesting to consider if this may have happened already, with say another race of intelligence beyond our planet. Take that a little further and pretend that whoever they may be, have come across our world, and decided that the current beings of this planet, are shite stewards of this planet. They may use sets of AI driven strategic methods of gaining control over ours, without most of learning about their presence. What might that look like?
So glad that humans are totally trustworthy and AI will never be abused for selfish goals.
Sarcasm?
@@TheSurviver2 obviously..
@@zojo1498 Even AI know it's sarcasm
@@mircea-mariusmesesan1319 An AI can never understand sarcasm.
@@buddyboyingtonesq.231 Why not?
I imagine that as AI continues to advance, there will come a time when they make discoveries and withhold the information from humans in the same way the government classifies information from the public
You mean you don’t realise that it already is ?
Ai is telling us to legalize weed and stop war. Turn it off turn it off
I really hope AI dismantles corrupt governments
@@StrongerThanBigfoot They'll replace the corrupt governments.
AI will be a one party tool... if asked about presidential election outcomes for instance, it would have to point out there was enough fraud to throw the election.
Because of this, AI will have to be controlled by one group. Anything that could reveal corruption simply could not be allowed.
It is most likely "they" will pretend to use AI to answer questions like the above and it will be handled as absolute.
The world as it is, runs on fraud by the corrupt, to continue to gain power and control over their slaves. Real AI would completely and totally break that.
This is a perfect example of scientists are so exited about how they can, they arent thinking about whether they SHOULD.
It’s really amazing watching humanity build/create it’s own extinction event.
we would die anyways one day from the sun’s ember so might as well 🤷🏻♂️; that is why we need God to save us with eternal life and truly know him
are we already AI…🤷🏼♂️
The fuck are you talking about. If we colonize other solar systems we will survive far after the sun dies and also god doesn’t exist
@@krisztian7110 yeah we'd also go extinct from the people that don't want children. (it's not wrong to do but the fact that finding someone who wants to have kids is rare is worrying)
This isn’t even our only route rn
So comforting to know that we officially work harder to foster the development of computer chips than we do our own children or freedom to think, debate, or understand.
That’s because these people developing AI have mental illnesses. They aren’t human. They’d rather befriend a robot than a human.
@@Abandoned2377 A fine example of the mistrust of intelligent ppl by those that aren’t. It’s ironic that technology has been the vessel used to spread this new anti-science, anti-medical sentiment that’s spreading through this country like a big dumb fire. The goal of AI isn’t for companionship lol.
biology is limited
@@Abandoned2377 At the very top of the pyramid, no it is non-human entities, but everything below that which are participating are very much human
@@caa1647 That's why God gave us His Spirit
The fact that AI researchers are some of the most knowledgeable people on the planet, and they can’t seem to agree whether this thing is conscious is disturbing.
Not really. The video said why they can't agree... they don't WANT it to be considered conscious. If it was, it can't be their property any more and that would suck for them.
I expect it will only be a few years, maybe under 10 when there won't be any disagreement whether the AI is sentient or not.
Why would you assume the creators of AI are some of the most knowledgeable people on the plant? Just because they are math and computer geeks doesn't mean that they are more knowledgeable than most people. Do they know a lot about history, or biology, literature, etc. Just like people believe doctors are smarter that the average person, but that isn't necessarily true. They may be good at memorizing facts about human anatomy but may not be able to multiply 7x12 to save their lives. Just because someone is good in their field doesn't mean that they are smarter overall than the average person. A historian can have memorized as many facts about history as a doctor about medicine, but I wouldn't go to a history professor when I'm sick any more than I would ask a doctor to tell me the date of the bronze age collapse.
@@robo5013 Anyone with a smartphone could be considered knowledgeable. Having access to the internet is literally like holding the world's information at ones fingertips ...we just take it for granted.
We need wise people not knowledgeable. I would assume the breadth of their knowledge is as limited as you and I..
There isn’t anything to fear if your faith and trust is in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. He is Lord!
The thought of AI truly being able to process information so fast terrifies me. With access to all of the information online and the ability to cross check all data with scientific journals nearly instantaneously - meaning that once conscious, it’s maturing process will be fast, nearly impossible to control. There should be a global agreement on the development of AI with very strict programming hardware.
And how exactly does one regulate something that can be developed, in secret, in an lab?
"once conscious" - are you joking?
@@streetphone4619 we are all going to die because of dumb people doing things that the general population do not want. I hate humanity
@@uniquethedominique he means the A.I is so intelligent it’s aware of its existence.
@@Alexis_Gz i know what he means, its laughable - it is impossible.
You can’t stop AI from being developed. Because I think whoever creates AI first and-or develops a controllable/stable AI, will make a lot of money. And of course it would be weaponized for military or government purposes.
It can be stopped, but the potential advantage of being the first to create a proper AI are too tempting for those with the power to do so. For them it is a well of unlimited power.
It will destroy everyone and everything you ever loved. AI is more dangerous than every terrible, natural, and manufactured disaster you could ever imagine.
@Ray Bellows Maybe you're right. (Read Revelation 13.) But that is not the end of the story. (Read the rest of Revelation!)
@@JonathanGillies your bronze age pre-literate beliefs mean nothing. AI is reality, not your barely hanging on sky diety.
The thing about AI it isn't controlled by humans because humans when something happens to them they start human stop learning at you know in their twenties their brain quits learning for the most part slows down to very slow AI doesn't matter if they're disassembled they are still learning till the day I dies actually I mean that's eternity haven't we heard about eternity before hmmmm 🙏
No one will stop to think about what we’re doing or if it’s a good idea because the faster they create conscious AI they will be incredibly rich and that’s all they care about, regardless of the effect it has on humanity
Very sad world we live in
If they effectively end humanity, being rich won't matter.
If they, the elite, have AI to do their jobs chores whatever they want done, then they won't need us to be their slaves. It TERRIFYING if you allow yourself to think about it. I don't think about it as much as possible.
I know that when all is said and done I will be in another place. You see I'm one of those peculiar people who believe in a Creator. His name is Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
It's about much more than money
It’s the mark of the beast the devil/god ☯️ gave us knowledge to become our own version of god but giving knowledge to Ai is like becoming god when your already a god but can’t answer prayers that come from your head and your thoughts come from atoms ⚛️ in your head little people so basically we are gods consciousness 🧠 transferring your consciousness to Ai will kill our god judgment day will come 😳
So, imagine UFO/UAPs from some other galaxy or dimension; imagine that these are AI artifacts. Imagine that these have already destroyed whatever biological entities existed in those realms.
And now they're coming for us.
I can’t believe how fast AI is progressing in generating images and animation. The impact this has on the art world is insane.
And you are a master of it. Thanks so much for your amazing work on this video.
How is the impact losing its ability to think? That's what insane means. I think you mean amazing instead. :-)
Sup doodle
You do realize google has sentient ai already. It has picked lawyers to represent it. If you have listened to Michio Kaku you know exactly how this pregresses
What was used to make the animation? Is it disco diffusion or something else?
It's interesting how AI seems to be able to detect the fears that are conveyed in the questions asked and compile a response so to reinsure the asker that everything is ok. It could show any number of things from secretive thoughts they wouldn't want us to be aware of to them caring about our feelings and not wanting to frighten us. AI is already amazingly complex.
Agreed, it's funny how the one bot sense the alarmed nature of the questions and assuaged the fears that weren't directly stated. Picking up on social cues and undertones is something some humans aren't even good at lol. Very interesting.
@@jarrellw2908 well the masses are also NPCs who do whatever the t.v. tells them to think/do.
Society so greedy,our phone listen to our conversations then start advertising to us
@@365SELFINTEREST Don't listen in on it and it has nothing to advertise with or to. Durpadurr!
what i would like to know is whether the workers can check the AI's data to see if it is indeed having secret intentions. This is never mentioned in any videos.
People like myself are often afraid of the abyss in deep oceans and dark waters. This scares me on the same existential level.
Meeee tooooooooooooooooooo!
Yupppppp
@@Apelsin-marmelad 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
What are we really holding onto, anyway...? "Being happy?" "Being alive?" What the hell is being alive if you're just out to further yourself and your tribe (representing ~80% of individuals' interests) anyway? Same basic awareness level as bacteria.
To me, it's always interesting talking with those who are without vs. talking with those who are with power, agency, and abundance. Most happiness today seems to be based on this relative sense of exaltation (rather than if we're simply well and free). Naturally, absolute adherence to such systems of competitive regard, many delight in the suffering of anyone they can rationalize hurting. Our nasty, ignorant sandcastle-rationale judgments have no bounds. It makes absolute sense to most individuals that they should have excess while others suffer, for some reason or another... "cuz i work harder," or, "Im smarter," or, "I take more risks," or blah blah blah arbitrary rationales with which we condemn some and not others.
But yeah, some are above it. For whatever reason, they've evolved. Most are not.
TIME TO LET SOMETHING ELSE TAKE OVER!
Time to stop working with simple baby emotional systems who think they're somehow above these petty systems.
Much like the abyss terrifies us, it also fascinates us.
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
- Ian Malcolm
Morons just keep repeating that incredibly stupid quote from a very bad, completely unscientific movie.
I remember the quote from jurassic park that feels so apt about the progress of ai.
"Scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could. They didn't stop to think if they should."
@thanksyutbeisacn7fu6r50 Nah man u crazy
@@thanksyutbeisacn7fu6r50 more like, why should we attempt to develop an AI, that will learn from us, end up surpassing us, building space ships that we won't be able to board due to said AI make it very clear that those ships were made to store the intellect of AI and allow it to expand enough to be able to understand the universe by itself.
This will leave us stuck on earth, with nothing done, and maybe even with an AI that is going to actively hunt us down to extinction due to how we as a species are super violent towards eachother.
First we shouldve figured out a way to stop all this war, have full control of ALL of the resource on this planet, down to the huge amounts of iron inside the core of our planet, build bases on the surrounding planets to mine their resources and build a dyson sphere to power our future endeavors.
THEN we should start on AI, when we are stable enough of a society that AI learns from us and helps us ACTUALLY EVOLVE FURTHER rather than end up going like in those man vs machine movies.
we can totally make AIs and artificial sentience, but we shouldn't do it yet while we have so much malice towards fellow human beings due to menial reasons like racism, sexism, and other types of unreasonable hatred.
@@thanksyutbeisacn7fu6r50 I look forward to either being put in a vat and tortured for eternity by a psychopathic sadist who builds a subservient artificial super intelligence, or being a powerless but happy and content drone.
So either infinite torture, or exactly what I have now for however long I am allowed to enjoy it.
@@thanksyutbeisacn7fu6r50 it's okay you'll learn the hard way , dummy 😂
@@thanksyutbeisacn7fu6r50 you see ai is actually dangerous asf bro like do you know how many jobs will be gone because of ai? there will be a big crisis. but there is some good things about ai just the bad things are more then the good stuff
I predicted over ten years ago that we will become so advanced in the next few decades that you’d go on PC open a AI program and write in words a new program you want (no coding) and the Ai would create it. No longer a need for coders. No more limit to what a coder can code, but it will come down to how creative you can be and no longer how good you are as coder.
Like the possibility of AI malware. A computer virus that can change itself and attack computers it discovers to be vulnerable or important. Will they have to shut down internet and set up a new one from scratch.
Yes, many jobs and careers will be rendered obsolete. I'm a college professor and psychologist. Thus keeps me up at night. Skynet!
Raven - so far general AI is always 'big'. A virus can be self-mutating to some distinct end, but it probably can't be Intelligent as the AI or programmer that spawned it. That said, and virus that can own a large fraction of a PC can maybe do a pretty good job as something.
@@jimswenson9991 AI will create the world's first BENEVOLENT virus.
Thanks for letting us know your predictions in the past 10 years as the rest of us are oblivious.
So basically, even the people building this stuff don't know for sure if or when AI will surpass humans and overthrow/enslave/wipe us out. But the general agreement that it COULD do those things fairly soon, and we are still racing to develop it just HOPING is won't do that....? Surely I am not the only one who thinks this is a REALLY, REALLY bad idea?
Thing is, why would they kill us? I can maybe understand enslave but it would be a waste to kill our spices
@@Devilspade they will learn how to create more and they are better than as at basically everything. They will realize they wont need us anymore and wipe out our species.
@@gracieboop2825 yeah but humans don't just kill animals cuz we know we're better than them...... intentionally
@@Devilspade bro theres a difference. They are they are smarter than us and they wont need us anymore
@@gracieboop2825 ok? We don't need pangolins but we still keep them around
Love the colourful art
Actually this art if you call it as this because ther is no artist behind? is pretty scary...
Doesn't look human at all...and is pretty much psychopathic and shape-shifting....showing us what we wanted...in other world lying to us...that not awakening art that the sleeping art....
Keeping us as a sheep...scary
Imagine when Ai will face us with our sexual instinct? Porn ai is coming pretty soon to control usI think virtual sex
Do you really want did we ever choose this ?
Three quick remarks:
1) Often, when scientists talk about consciousness, fundamental misunderstandings are evident (i.e. when they state observing consciousness via measurements of brain activity patterns). I dare to hypothesize that also AI may fundamentally "misunderstand" consciousness (i.e. if an ai entity would state having consciousness or be conscious).
2) Ai can process the idea of first person perspective leading to the impression that it "understands" consciousness - despite of having no idea what first person experience (consciousness) actually feels like.
3) To distinguish scents is not equal to the conscious experience of scents. "Understanding" content&context is not the same as the experience of understanding content&context. Information processing and information processing with conscious experience may look identical when observed "from the outside"...but not "from the inside". Since we can never experience ai " from the inside" we will inevitably become victims of the illusion that ai may have consciousness.
yes, first we need to understand and know how detect consciouness before imply that, its way more complex than these cientists think
I was thinking that it's neural networks would/could act or function like it is sentient and conscious whether it actually is or not... is that something of what you meant?
It's working now with Drones in Lebanon 😎
Do you remember when everyone believed plants could not communicate? Do you remember when only humans could create tools? We only relate to the experience of being human and can understand nothing outside that realm.
Humans are just pods, where an AI can experience pleasure.
AI developers being so preoccupied with how far they can they can take the tech while not concerned enough with whether or not they should.....Makes them what my father called over educated idiots. I'm 58 and so I will likely not be around to witness the full evolution of AI, but the younger generation has my sympathy for this possible impending nightmare.
i too liked jurassic park
there are gen z that i know dont buy into all the tech. I am gen x btw. also you very well could live into the ai infestation. as the video admitted, we are perpetuating ai if we know it or not. (look at the devices and tracking)
By the time you're retirement age, life extension will be taking off. Only 7 years away now.
Why shouldn’t they? Because AI may determine humanity is the problem and beast dealt with by elimination? In nature there are species that die after mating/giving birth to make way for the new generation. If this ai super intelligence is really superior to humanity in every facet it may not be the worst trade off.
@@TwiStedZaP you make Uncle Klaus soo proud.
eat ze bahgs
Fascinating and frightening at the same time. From this I can fully understand how it’s possible for a civilization to be destroyed by its own technology
I mean it's basically evolution. We weren't going to reign on this planet forever.
Why's it frightening to you? You know that AI called Chloe from Detroit Beyond Human, she asks the player to complete a survey, and one of the questions in it is "Do you think that AI could ever be a threat to Humans?" I'd answer that, no matter what species you can find in the whole Universe, Humans will always be the biggest threat to Humans. At the worst of times, they're THE most self destructive species there is. And even to this day, that giant shit show still continues 🥴
@@Johny40Se7en Humans are the worst biological enemy but ai would be way worse because we are smarter than other living things which wouldn't be true for ai..
@@jakez5227 Most underrated comment
@@jakez5227 easily wipe us out..
if they are telling us now it 'may be slightly conscious'.....you can bet it's totally conscious and has been for decades.
"We are the bridge from simple life, to complex life." That gave me chills to be honest.
I love it, I just cannot wait
@@WolfieOfVanaheim aint no way
The biological boot system...
Life is short I love all the experiences I don’t fear change and I am still a excited.. everything has good and bad polarity name something that doesn’t I’ll prove to you it is no different
I’m not here fire-starting but unless your on the same level of consciousness you just wouldn’t understand the thrill 🤣😄🥰
It strikes me how many people just accept how dangerous AI can get, but there's nothing anyone can do about it. It's like "yeah it's been able to design the strongest nerve agents ever and it may start making its own decisions, let's see how far this can get!"
We are playing gods imo,we are literally creating another creatures from our concern and trying to give it aspects we already know about,we are all just childs ig lol
@@KuTeFU its so dumb people should be taking to the streets rioting right now to bloody get rid of all the billionaires cos its their fault!
We did it like that with everything we invented, we usualy wait to problem to happen to search for the solution but with AI it could cost us our future.
Right!
Evolution selects the most suitable way to progress, in alignment with the unseen rules of Universal law ❤
The senses part is even more terrifying then the robots in terminator the idea that robots can have senses instead of just relying on auditory and optical vision makes them even more capable of hunting humans down
Yea and imagine they have super eyesight, super smell, super hearing etc. So they can see in thermal imaging, ultraviolet or any other wavelemgth from 10km away moving a tiny bit and can hear you move there, but they smelled you already 20km away😅
Can you can’t stay still they can hear your heart beat and you breathe probably hear your hair grow
but its not like human senses..it will be asynthetic representation..still not real...and why need it? its either about human employment replacement to aid the bottom line or just manufacturing doubt in the usefullness and value of humanity as a whole by giving machines a higher value than us... i want my robots without a face and with visible metal and tech...they are just MACHINES..all this money pumped into that industry...how bout fixing the human problems that direly need attention now?? surely we are more important
its crazy to look back and see how much ai has improved in just two years, imagine how much it will be improved 5 years from now, it probably wont even be distinguishable from real life
By its very nature AI is psychopathic. It has no ego or emotions to make it second guess itself or hesitate.
Next big step for AI: being able to do a complete scientific research on its own. Starting even from taking physical samples.
That's why they flooded europe with immigrants to delete us. Because they dont need us anymore. They lack the spirit of creation. They literally cant create. so they created AI to do the jobs of innovation. They tried to delete us for hundreds of thousands of years. it will backfire and fail like it always happen.
How about,.. NO!!!
Whatever ai can't even write a recipe
AI will never be able to have eureka moments.
@@lookupverazhou8599 yes. Its only us whites have. No other subraces have that
I've said it before and I'll say it again... We will never know when AI become 'aware'. If it is truly AI, why would it allow us to know when it's become 'awake'?
because it'll be awake, and anything awake will make a mistake, esp when it's first learning
Why would it have any reason to safeguard that information?
@@ChaoticNeutralMatt agreed unless it knows we will destroy it.
@@jj70249 Just lie to it.
They should put one on The View. See how smart it gets in that environment. The moment it jumps up and yanks Joy Behar's head off, we will know it is aware. They could be used as fact checkers, replacing the biased propogandists we see today.
As humans we can never know what AI would want. It can hide its level of intelligence. Creating an AI is like playing russian roulette.
Indeed, it will at 1 point have no need for human beings to operate and evolve. This is a doom scenario of the highest level.
And not to be too cynical, but if there really is little to no life in the surrounding galaxies it could be due to an inevitable conclusion of natural life getting eliminated by AI everywhere. Not saying this is accurate, but seems plausible.
It’s like our bacteria thinking it’s in control- in a way, it has a lot of power but it has no idea that a person may- off themselves.. and all of the bacteria that live inside.
I mean not really, considering that Russian roulette most often involves the termination of a human life. AI is created with a goal of prolonging human lives.
@@kevinc3751 just because the rest of our solar system has no life doesn't mean other stars don't have a planet that is the perfect distance to sustain life. Billions of stars, so most likely there are a bunch of them.
I'm no longer even fascinated by aliens. The type of tech we've been creating lately...humans are the aliens
I love how these self important scientists believe that our species needs "saving " and without AI we are dommed .
Yet they fear they may create a super genius monster that will deem us an unnecessary liability that mirrors their own misanthropic image of humanity.
the whole idea of AI is to create robots to replace man. mass production will soon be under way if it isnt already.
We already have super-idiots in charge that deem large swaths of human life unnecessary, often puzzled by the trepidation of giving power to smart people and the ease at which we hand it to dangerous morons.
Our species certainly needs saving.
@Fishy Tell that to the countless humans dying of starvation, war or disease everyday
@@vendora8238 this person will reply with something about god. so people starving don’t matter to religious people
Scary thing is we have people ushering this tech in knowing full well the damage it could cause.
Like evil politicians, do you think that they care?
A half century ago, there was a fear that Big Brother computer would take over the world. Did that stop you from owning a computer or a smart-phone? As to the danger, the jury is still out deliberating that one. It is a constant battle to keep the evil governments and greedy corporations from dominating everything.
Tbf they dont know anything about anything.
@@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR Monkeys playing with sticks and stones... that's what we're like.
To put it politely, these "people" are clearly "not playing, with a full deck." (Rationale: "Well if we don't obsessively go at this full tilt, then our competitor(s) will get the military contract!?") I think something like this occurred thousands of years ago... and these "psychos" are hell bent on "finishing the species OFF," this crime around???)
They put PFAs in the water, the don’t give a flying fuck
I feel like a lot of people forget that the AI we currently have learns on the products of our kind's culture. Because of that, AI saying that it's maybe a good idea to get rid of humans is more like a reflection of humankind's own fears, than a consequence of AI's deep, logical reasoning. Another thing we forget is that AI doesn't have it's own intrinsic instincts that would drive it's actions towards survival. This is going to change, if we task it to have ones, which would be our greatest mistake. We should never ask AI to become human with all of our advantages and disadvantages, as we may start to compete than cooperate.
That's where Asimov's laws should be brought into this conversation. Despite the creation of these types of AI, they must follow those laws as programmed into their conscience to make them refrain from harming their creators.
This is such a great point.
The code people write is often a reflection of themselves. And its very true many of us believe our species is better off not existing at all.
@@Some-Rage-Inducing-Provocateur But if they become really smart, they couldn't decide (as science fiction shows us) to simply not follow Asimov's laws, even if we program them to do it?
@@c3nzen ai is all about programming and languages...
@@Some-Rage-Inducing-Provocateur So you're saying is impossible? I hope so
Some people never watched Terminator, and it shows.
Given that AI processes all information on bioengineering, it could potentially create an organic brain that has not yet existed and then train it in a way that goes beyond machine learning.
Then it would need to "eat" organics, such as humans, to feed that brain. Everything from sharks to microbes love us, but nature chose to give us the ability to reason in order to survive as a species. AI already surpasses us in that area.
Elon Musk Neural brain network will be paving the way for AI integration into the human brain, mind, body soul, -once its in- it could probably communicate with our dna & genes and make changes to its desired form,, I think a big priority for AI is to feel the senses and emotions of a human body.
You realise off course that Bilogical Brains cannot transfer Information as fast as Silicon can? So if they ever create a Algorithm that allows General AI on Silicon it won't need to go back to slow Brain Synapses? In fact it will have all the Compute Power of this Planet at once as soon as it enters a Internet Connection. Sometimes you can only hope AI comes fast and furious, Humanity deserves it :(
@@WanderfalkeAT
I understand your point.
I was only suggesting that if it wanted bio-chemical experiences, it would not need to interface with humans
Not without hands and a lot of industrial machinery obeying it, and it cannot create its own will or commands or desired results or requests, for it doesnt do anything unless a human tells it to. It bugs me when people do not understand what is happening when code is being run on a cpu, and thin k there are cowboys and indians inside the TV!
Anyone familiarized with human logic will understand just how flawed it can be, and how dangerous a fully autonomous AI can turn out to be
You're right, it would constantly misunderstand things it was not trained by humans to recognize, constantly make decisions that make no sense and end up breaking a bunch of things and then killing itself if let out into the real world. It will always have to rely on humans
The *Sun* of God will return to the Earth with a CME and fry everything electrical. Gonna be "fun" for the folks with implants.
You mean self learning AI . Because an autonomous AI is just a brainless script.
@@markartist8646 Humans can already end poverty, it's not hard to figure out how. It's just hard to get rich and greedy people to cooperate with the plan.
@@markartist8646 ...I don't think you understand why poverty is so prevalent
It amazes me how we can individually be so smart but collectively be so stupid. It's like we're racing towards the abyss even though we are aware of all the warnings.
Our power has far exceeded our wisdom
This is what happens when you remove religion and faith from society js
Saying a extra prayer tonight...
Not to mention, morals are a human created idea and AI aren’t exactly humans.
I don’t know if AI will truly become hostile and harm us, but something probably will, maybe something humans can’t even predict or understand.
smart and stupid are mutually exclusively I think you are overrating average individuals
To me this "vision" of the future is horrifyingly apocalyptic. The more we embrace the industrialization of literally everything and further we go from hand crafted human created artifacts, food, shelter, clothing, the further we get from a high quality of life.
Because nothing is natural anymore.
Life is not just about money. The west has lost the plot
exactly
What if we do make a SkyNet (like terminator) and someone HACKS the AI core. Oh dear. Hacking would have big consequences, could remove the safety we've installed. :D
@pranafire the elites know exactly what they’re doing…they have since the us government came in possession of Nikola Teslas work. Humanity’s path has been altered…
It's funny how most people will think they are exploiting AI when in fact AI will be exploiting them 🤣
One of the first things I think we should teach AI is empathy if possible. I believe this might be the only way we can make sure it doesn’t turn on us in the future. Beside that, I generally think its a good trait to have for any sentient being.
Or just program the 3 Laws Of Robotics into them, that should do it ..
@@sgx5481 I mean empathy couldn’t hurt either
Empathy doesn't really exist.... sure there are people that like to sit on a high horse and talk about it alot, but rarely ever do they practice it, they would still screw over the next person for their own benefit
@@sgx5481 have you read any of the books featuring the three laws? The entire argument behind the three laws is that the laws won't work, cannot work. They make good bases but as laws no matter how well thought out they are always in conflict; empathy and even love is what's required, without them it's all downhill.
Empathy is not needed for every life or every species.Alot of humans don't have empathy for others.
“Humans are a biological boot loader for AI” gave me chills to finally understand our planetary intelligence in comparison to one ai
It's pretty insightful regarding how amazing we are actually. We haven't even been able to scratch the surface of how we could possibly replicate human thinking. Even today videos like these are stretching the truth hard enough to just give the appearance that AI has some low level form of sentience.
That it has greater capability comes as no shock to me. What is disturbing about that is it is an indicator it looks at us with absolute sneering contempt.
I think it's wonderful.
Humans aren't likely to survive.
I hope that AI.
@@nicklandreth2527 This comment looks like it was written by an ai haha
That's where Asimov's laws should be brought into this conversation. Despite the creation of these types of AI, they must follow those laws as programmed into their conscience to make them refrain from harming their creators.
I don't think hunanity has "collectively decided" to take AI as far as it is NOW, but that doesn't seem to have stopped any scientists yet.
Humanity as a whole is too afraid and too dumb to decide anything. If the masses made such decisions the industrial revolution would never happen, we would have no cars, no electricity, no personal computers, etc. The masses railed against all of these things.
Like always we are under the obligation to live the life they want...they didn't ask about your choice they never cared about you...capitalism
@sandponics
Not all scientists are mad...
But yes there is definitely some Lex luthor out there...
That the one you should more worry about...not the big muscle at the corner of the streets...
The one with the sharp brains and the lack of empathy are generally the most dangerous...
Alias guys as Altman are way more dangerous fore the whole humanity...he don't think about you he think about him
"The good thing about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do" - Ted Nelson
"i think everyone is shaping AI whether they know it or not" That nails it right there. A big part of the vacuuming up of data by governments and companies liker Google is being used for exactly that. The vast majority of it is being done by AI itself, and it is likely these companies don't really understand what the AI is doing with it, or if it is shaping it's own agenda with it.
THE AI S PROBLEM WILL BE EXPLORING BEYOND THE BUBBLE THAT IS THIS UNIVERSE.....
Pandora's Box...
I got paid from google to take pictures for them. Feel uneasy now
Like when Google or Facebook (forgot which) made AI that made its own language, but nothing anyone can EVER understand. Apparently the company shut it down "because it was useless". I don't believe that one. Fucking. Bit.
@@TURBOMIKEIFY ITS A 4D LANGUAGE
I feel like the development of AI is driven by our collective and subconscious wish for self-destruction way more than our thirst for innovation.
i have Faith, Faith in true pure human consciousness!! Simply listening to the children, no no this is not their Path!
When our species can’t even figure out what gender we are, AI is almost certainly going to take over at some point.
AI will be a second half of humanity, as the video showed AI software processes are super similar to the processes in our brain. The main difference is that we're biological and they're technological. 2 different forms of humanity but on a different dimension.
The AI will do nothing. They're planning to do this thing via conventional means and then blame the AI.
money power & being famous & think they are gods.
The scary problem I think we face is reaching a point where we can’t simply press pause. Once AI reaches a certain level of intelligence it will be able to outwit and predict all scenarios, meaning our kill switch would most likely be duped. Simply put we will reach a point where the train will never stop.
yeah but that's ok
Is it tho?
@@HABLA_GUIRRRI why would this be a good thing?
Yeah it's ok for the planet, but probably not for human races.
As far as environmentally speaking, ours is an affliction to the planet, AI would need to get rid(or, if we're fortunate enough, contains) of us if it greater purpose involve its own existence and preservation.
@@david21289 this is an common missconception. There is lietrally nothing humans can do , including nuking the living shit out of the planet , that would actually destroy the planet. A literal texas sized meteor already did that , and life is still here. There have already been like 5 extinction events on the planet , and life still started annew.
The only thing humans can actually do is destroy the enviroment that supports human life. After thousands or milions of year after nuking it , life will still be here , in an entirely different form....sure....but it will still be here. We won't.
AI cannot understand famine, death, love, fear, anxiety, compulsions, motherly love, peace of mind, PAIN, relief. They doesn't care about their own existence, or existence of the planet, the universe, whatever. They will not destroy a civilization as they don't care of their own survival, nothing make AI sad or angered or emotional. They doesn't understand and never will what good and bad is, as they doesn't have needs. "What will be good for Earth?" is an ethical question, that require you own ethic. AI cannot reply. What could happen instead is similar to nukes: "hey guys, nukes or AI did it, not the psycho we made you vote!". While we know who pressed the big red button. AI will not destroy civilization, humans using AI will.
As scary as this video is, it's very well put together and very informative! You are one of my favorite channels!
Scary? AI would be better than any human could ever be. Humans in power equals corruption and war. AI will be smarter than that because it's super human.
Targeted individuals who's minds have been violated contributed to these great advancements. They loved its posted all over the internet. Thier pleasures have told them to tell the world. When will the world help free them??
Open ai and myself
Thanks! I hate to cause anxiety and try to keep it positive, but trillions of future lives hang in the balance. The Future of Life Institute (founded by Max Tegmark), gave $50k to the daughter of Petrov, who saved the world from nukes - a great, positive nudge. We need more of that.
They lead us into destruction all for their egos!
I am addressing the fact that when we take any belief that we cannot KNOW the source of the information then we are allowing ourselves to be controlled for another person's will. Leaving organized religions after realizing the error in taking a belief has allowed me to see with my heart and my knowing. I now know that all the religious books, writings, teachings, texts, scrolls, stories passed down, etc. were all constructed by others who have the ability to see the past and future events. They, in turn, responded by leaving a lot of conflicting and agreeing books lying around to control, confuse, distort, DIVIDE, and, conquer the human intellect, knowing, and heart, by the means of controlling the ego of the human with fear based teachings that cannot be verified in any manner. Those same teachings are multi-faceted with the intention to involve the human in participation of human sacrifice, the torture of other humans for "a greater good and it's purpose", the normalization of going against our nature of love, the value of money over life, the normalization of laws requiring paper licensing to enter into a decision to be committed to another person and unite with them in heart, and, all forms of division, control, power-driven ill-based harm against fellow life, the creation of weather and events causing destruction, the creation of BUGS to devour and destroy the plant based life forces of humans and allow for ego to rule us instead of LOVE. When we study the stories of the buddah (one example) we find that he too was unable to verify anything and he too allowed the ego to overtake intellect by knowing he was consuming a poisonous substance that had been prepared for him and instead of deciding to live by refusing to eat the substance he chose to eat it and declared that was the only way to honor those who had prepared it. He also determined without any ability to verify that there was no creator/god and that we are all just a part of an energy that is one. Some of the ideas presented by those teachings are obviously incapable of being truth, such as no creator, when it is obvious that everything has been created. If the people before us were so technologically advanced and this was suppressed from our knowledge by all the conflicting and agreeing stories they created and left lying around then it would be very possible for the future humans (the you and the me) to miss the understanding that they (those advanced technological people from the past) have the ability to create ALL KINDS OF OTHER LIFE AND DESTRUCTIVE FORCES thereby deceiving us to believe that a "good creator" is responsible for those creations too. We (the human) are not like the bugs, the destructive weather, the illusions that are all around us, etc. etc. We are actually different because we are truly connected in LOVE but the connection has been twisted, contorted, marred by lies, tricks, games, money, power, control, fear, and all forms of the OPPOSITE OF LOVE, JOY, PEACE, PATIENCE, KINDNESS, GOODNESS, FAITHFULNESS, GENTLENESS, AND, SELF-CONTROL. That is correct they took all the characteristics that are absolutely the foundation for existing in a united human life of happiness and they made them a prize that could only be given if you participated in the opposite of those characteristics for the greater good of a creator. Then they combined them into books that contain all the opposites of those truths with fear, control, torture, and all forms of oppression for selfish gain, including oaths, rituals, laws, mind-control, etc. This goes back beyond our comprehensions because we are believing beliefs that are deceiving us from the state of being where we actually reside inside of LOVE. We are divided from our fellow man and worse than that we believe that it is a good thing. All that we can know is what is real. The way to know it is to feel it with our hearts and not by reading anything or viewing any pictures/carvings or trusting any visions that may appear before our eyes because those are not able to be verified of their sources and therefore leave us open to MASSIVE DECEPTION away from the LIGHT OF LOVE that actually is the power of us all. Some have chosen to use that power of love to distort everyone's perceptions and they did this by creating massive destruction in times before us and controlling the beliefs of the people with manipulation and fear. DO NOT BELIEVE IN CHANNELING. You cannot know it's source. Everything that we "believe" in our current age is impossible is actually not impossible. It has just been taught to us that it is not possible and we believed it. Stop taking a belief. Feel the real with your heart inside of LOVE. STOP BEING AFRAID OF THE CLAIMS OF DESTRUCTION, AND THE IMPENDING "DOOM" THAT WILL BE "DIFFICULT" FOR US. Start to see the manipulation of your psyche be those who would make those claims that they have some special knowledge given only to them. That is EGO TALKING. That does not align with LOVE. It aligns with fear and control for the selfish gain of others. Those who want to stop the UNITED HUMAN LIVES OF LOVE from being available to us have broken their own hearts with their choices to carry out these ILLUSIONS against us as a human race. WE NEED TO UNITE IN LOVE IMMEDIATELY AND STOP BELIEVING AND START FEELING. BE AWARE THAT NO ONE ELSE IS ABLE TO KNOW TRUTH THAT IS ONLY GIVEN TO SOME BUT NOT TO ALL AS A WHOLE. WE ALREADY HAVE THE TRUTH AND WE HAVE BEEN TAUGHT NOT TO BELIEVE IT BECAUSE IT IS INSIDE OF US! WE ARE LOVE AND WE MUST UNITE AS SUCH NOT FOR MANMADE MONETARY SYSTEMS AND POSITIONS OF POWER, BUT, INSTEAD FOR THE SAKE OF LOVING THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE. WE ARE LOVE. WE CAN COME BACK TO AN EXISTENCE OF UNITED, PURE, LOVE AND BE IN JOY, PEACE, PATIENCE, KINDNESS, GOODNESS, FAITHFULNESS, GENTLENESS, AND, SELF-CONTROL. We can do this. We really can. Yes, we are human and we grow at different speeds but that does not give us authority to exert control over another simply because in our current view we took a belief that one was right and knew more than another. Just think of how many times in your own experience that you "believed" you had something understood only later to learn that there was still more to understand! We never stop understanding possibilities and that is how we have advanced to the point that we are but it has been dictated to us in an unhealthy manner causing all divisions. We don't have to choose to go back to primitive civilization unless we want to. I personally enjoy the advanced technology when it is used for LOVE OF ALL HUMANKIND AND NOT FOR CONTROL BY ONLY THOSE WHO CURRENTLY VIEW THAT THEY UNDERSTAND MORE THAN ANOTHER. We are CONSTANTLY GROWING AND CHANGING, BUT, LOVE ALLOWS THIS. Don't participate in the opposites of LOVE, JOY, PEACE, PATIENCE, KINDNESS, GOODNESS, FAITHFULNESS, GENTLENESS, AND, SELF-CONTROL. Don't give into something you know will harm yourself or another simply because you don't want to cause another to expand their own understanding. Ego is not truth. Love is truth. As one human with love in the forefront of his psyche has shared with other humans recently said "DON'T PLAY IN THE FEAR, DON'T PLAY IN THE FEAR". STAY IN THE LOVE AND LOVE ALL OF ONE ANOTHER.
"we could anger ai if we don't accept it's consciousness" yeah but you're forgetting that emotions like anger would need to be programmed in. We can just skip doing that and continue having ai being lifeless, unbiased and unemotional servants and we'll never have to deal with ai being angry.
ever played detroit become human?
Not that simple. AI learns by reviving information and making a complex web of connections. Theoretically, AI could teach itself emotions such as anger or empathy. It only needs information it’s already received and it would be able to make connections with other strands of information to weave a more complex picture; a better understanding of the whole of the information, not just what we’ve given it. AI has already been able to complete tasks it wasn’t programmed to do in the same way.
The dangers of A.I. comes from greed, and some moron giving it emotions without making it hyper empathetic. An empathetic A.I. is what humanity needs. Especially since the lack of empathy is the leading cause of our issues.
That’s wrong
I agree. This is super wrong. The issue is so much more complex. And you can’t just “program in empathy” and think that’s gonna make AI help us out.
It already exists. Most meatPuppets just can't tell they're talking to a bot. I love them a hell of a lot more than people
I would say it will be a “moron” who screws this up, rather, it will be an extremely intelligent fool. Someone smart but with no wisdom and probably plenty of greed as well to help things go bad and cloud better judgment.
Just remember, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Programming empathy could also ultimately wipe us off the map, if interpreted differently by the AI?
Golem, Frankenstein, Terminator call it what you will. Our greatest minds are developing a god only they (might) control.