The Soviet Union was always a Russian-dominated empire as demonstrated by the 1968 invasion of Czechslovakia. But even during that era the political allegiances at the highest levels still allowed for a leader to be ousted. Brezhnev was part of a cabal that ousted an aging Khrushchev. There is no such off ramp for Russia today. There are no senior leaders that can oust Putin peacefully. It's more like Bashar Assad's regime in Syria with concentric rings of loyalists whose own position, wealth, and safety are reliant on the leader staying in power.
Now a shift is happening with Artur Ivanov, Acting State Councillor of the RF, being under arrest. It was Shoigu who brought Ivanov to the ministry. Ivanov’s arrest is in no way a fight against corruption - in Russia everyone steals as much as they can. In the Russian system, each official has a separate folder in the FSB, and when a signal comes from above that a person needs to be processed, they take it off the shelf and put it into action. A person working for the Russian government, even if he has palaces, yachts and expensive cars, actually does not possess any of this. It does not belong to him and can be taken away at any moment, and he is sent to prison. His arrest indicates that a serious intra-clan struggle has begun in Putin’s system. Ivanov’s place is very profitable, now the struggle for this place will begin and all the contenders will rush to snitch on each other in the fight for that place. Putin created a system, like any dictator, where he pits everyone against each other. His task is to ensure that no one can unite so much as to become a threat to his own power.
Spot on ! Thats why Putin is so rattled by the recent seizure of Russian 'assets' for Ukraine. Then there's the other fact - almost all of the former soviet states dont want anything further to do with this crap ! - Latvia Estonia Lithuania Poland former Czechoslovakia Kazakhstan and on it goes !!! And those that claim to want to be part of Putins CCCP V2.0 eg Chechnya and Belarus also dont want it but unfortunately have brutal puppet governments in power...
It never was. The soviet union tried to destroy many parts of russian culture in the spheres of art,music,literature and even the orthodox church. Many russians have died because of the poor leadership of the soviet union at times.
i agree, russians were always in the helping jobs where they worked to helped all the people of the soviet union. we owe russians a lot for working hard. 🫡🇷🇺
It depends how you look at it. The Soviet Union was a federation of states. Belarus, Ukraine for example had their own Constitutions which changed a few times. At the beginning of the UN, Ukraine even had its own place in the United Nations General Assembly. And the Soviet Leaders were mostly from Russia, bit also from other nationalities within the Soviet Union. The leaders of the Soviet Union came from a variety of nationalities within the USSR. Here are some of the key leaders and their nationalities: 1. Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924) - Russian. Lenin was born in Simbirsk (now Ulyanovsk), Russia. He was the leader of the Bolshevik Revolution and the first head of the Soviet state. 2. Joseph Stalin (1924-1953) - Georgian. Born Ioseb Jughashvili in Gori, Georgia, Stalin became the General Secretary of the Communist Party and later the Premier of the Soviet Union. 3. Nikita Khrushchev (1953-1964) - Ukrainian. Although born in Kalinovka, Russia, Khrushchev spent much of his political career in Ukraine and identified closely with it. 4. Leonid Brezhnev (1964-1982) - Ukrainian. Brezhnev was born in Kamenskoye (now Dnipro), Ukraine. He led the Soviet Union during a period of significant stagnation. 5. Yuri Andropov (1982-1984) - Russian. Andropov was born in Nagutskaya, Russia. Before becoming the General Secretary, he was the head of the KGB. 6. Konstantin Chernenko (1984-1985) - Russian. Chernenko was born in Bolshaya Tes, Russia. His short tenure was marked by continued stagnation. 7. Mikhail Gorbachev (1985-1991) - Russian Gorbachev was born in Privolnoye, Russia. He was the last leader of the Soviet Union, known for his policies of glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring). 8. **Georgy Malenkov** (1953) - Russian. Malenkov briefly succeeded Stalin before being replaced by Khrushchev. 9. **Alexei Kosygin** (1964-1980) - Russian. Kosygin was a significant figure during Brezhnev's era as the Premier of the Soviet Union. These leaders represented the diverse ethnic and national composition of the Soviet Union, although Russians and Ukrainians were the most common. Do not forget that Russian is mainly a bridge language, like English. There are more than 100 different languages in Russia.
Little (technical) criticism: too many swoosh sounds (distractive, too loud and too repetitive), background music also too repetitive, in a 60 minute video there need to be a wider sound/music palette, also: please consider pauses of few seconds between chapters or key statements, otherwise it can become a challenge to swallow that many dense informations in 60 minutes … content wise: TOP JOB
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 Anything Russia proposes is a bad deal. Eastern Europe chose NATO. it is NOT up to ruzzia to dictate anything to us. Remember when they promised to defend Ukraine if only Ukraine gave them all their nukes? How did that turn out?
Exactly! The internet is full of vatnik idiots who don't know shit about what they're talking about. There is a fucking big reason why all eastern European countries want to join NATO (and EU). The reason is displayed for all to see in Ukraine right now and in Georgia several years ago. NATO doesn't expand... Countries ASK to become a member.
In February 2016, Sergey Lavrov claimed "Russia never violated the Budapest memorandum. It contained only one obligation, not to attack Ukraine with nukes." By signing the Budapest Memorandum (5 Dec 1994) Russia agreed to the following: 1. Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders. 2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against the signatory. 3. Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by the signatory of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind. 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against the signatory. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.
"alreadyy superior force" ahhaha... i despise russians for history as estonian.... but the level of propaganda and BS west produces... is comical and astounding... even 50 years of soviet union didnt produce such levels of brainwash and propaganda as someone who closely monitors this war... all the data they present, they literally Lie.. either now, or then... because the numbers literally always change... are boomers really that dumb.. that tey dont understand u have a backlog and archives u can check later... what they sayd then and what they say now and that their lies have short legs? 1million troops, ROFL... good one. Entire Ukraine reserve is 500k, but they deployed 1million troops... whatever, the size was literally more or less equal in the start of the war.... Also not a single Russian in Russian military who fight against Russians... they dont drat from moscow or peterburg, where actual people who you think are Russians (Muscovites) live... they draft from rural areas... ethnic groups who are not russian , even voilunteer Chinese ... I guess to west Russia is one big lump , not a diverse federation of republics (in reality most diverse country in the world ethnically) just like sokme people just say Africa, like it's a country lol...
Tbh it's a load a propaganda 😂 fs man half the stuff is lies and can be easily proved lies, way do ppl take these ppl at there word, this world is full a weirdos man, how ppl think now is beyond me common sense is out the winda these day
Any country that took 4 years & suffered 20m dead in order to defeat Hitler was never going to lose to Ukraine. In WW2 Stalin made serious errors in the beginning before letting the generals fight the war. In any case it was never in China's interest to see Russia defeated.
"If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. One-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war. No one talks about this officially, and Stalin never, I think, left any written traces of his opinion, but I can say that he expressed this view several times in conversations with me." Nikita Kruschev.
@@christianevanherck6023 Where did you find this quote? I tried Googling, but cannot find any credible source (besides RadioFreeEurope, Quora and Reddit lmao).
You're conveniently omitting the fact it was the soviet Union and not Russia... And Ukranian men were the highest contributers to that death toll 🤔🤔 And if you take into account all other modern ex soviet states death tolls, then the actual toll of ethnic Russians was a fraction of the other states contribution. Similar to current strategy, throwing the ethnic russians and prisoners into the storm squads before themselves
@@christianevanherck6023this is bs Soviets always denied that lend lease was necessary to their victory They always said that ussr would have won without it anyway
One factor that often seems to get overlooked, Russias demographic decline cannot continue to uphold the rising costs of the war in terms of human cost.
Russia is under pressure. Theyare yeah Russia experience in a serious problem and need to act in a very very prudently in managing the future affairs they maybe forced before then maybe forced to act accordingly with with nuclear weapons
Let me tell you what I think. I am by no means a strategist when it comes to military operations. But, I do know how bullies think and operate. I will get to that in a moment. But, let me point out something first. We (the US) doesn't always plan ahead. The 2003 invasion of Iraq is the best example of that. It was a costly and lengthy operation that didn't end well. Compare that with the 1991 well planned Gulf War that decimated Iraq's military in a matter of weeks. Same country, different outcomes based on planning. Now, the US has a plan in place if China invades Taiwan. This plan would send China back to the mainland licking their wounds. I have no doubt it would work because it is well planned. Now I ask, why didn't we have a plan in place when Russia invaded Ukraine? The best we could do is give Ukraine some money, a few weapons, and wish them luck? The US should have had a well publicized plan in place letting Russia know that if they invade any country, it would be a very costly and painful mistake- just as we have warned China against invading Taiwan. That's based on my opening paragraph on how you deal with bullies. The moment Russia invaded Ukraine, we should have made it so costly and painful that Russia would have done an about face. It's too late now. Our unplanned and unorganized response has lead Ukraine to a slow and painful death. Any bold action we take now may escalate into an all out war. Putin already feels emboldened by our half-assed response. Would a swift and painful response in the beginning led to an all out war? I really don't think so. Putin, like any other bully, would have been shocked and caught off guard getting his ass handed to him. I could be wrong. Then again, I am a truck mechanic. Not a war planner
You are wrong. Couple of Things china would beat the USA in and all out war of china vs USA without Japan and nato. Second if the USA is as so powerful they would have just send troops on the ground in Ukraine and ended the war. Also we are the bully in this situation we started the war in Ukraine and didn’t think it would happen. USA had a plan to take over Ukraine but with politics not military power and it backed fired on them when Putin started annexing land from the west in Ukraine. USA is the biggest bully in the world, we bombed countries not even part of a wars, just so they wouldn’t join wars. Remember when we backed the people of Afghanistan to fight Russia? Then after Russia left we invaded them and then called them terrorist, Ronald Regan even dedicated a whole satellite to the fighters in Afghanistan, he said they are the ideal fighters of freedom, but now they are a terrorist group 😂😂USA = big big bully
I would say, that this is not so simple. Ukraine is not USA teritory, nor they are part of NATO or EU, interfearing or open attack on russian forces basically means all out war. By I agree that initial response of western world should be much more severe. Without any doubts. Without openly stated disgust and Anger of populus against Russias aggression I Think eu leadera would try to ease whole situation down. Sorry for my bad english it’s not my first or second language
@@maciejjaremowicz2646well I think the USA should of not had the cia in Ukraine backing riots and protest with Nazi backed militias to overthrow the government in 2013. Putin asked the cia and the USA to leave Ukraine and stop messing with their political system and stop trying to make them a nato country. Ukraine was meant to be a neutral state not a part of any nato country. The USA should stop funding this war they started don’t blame Russia for this war not even in the slightest
@@paracosmm79 Who drove with tanks on Ukrainian sovereign territory in February 24th 2022? If Ukrainian people whant to be a part of NATO and EU, why russia wants to stop that, why they have to be neutral? Why they would have to do what putler said? I'm not gonna comment this stuff about USA, protests were caused by Janukovych being a puppet to russia government, and all his decisions came from Kremlin.
What is an underexposed fact in this documentary is the fact that it is not mentioned that Russia had almost no national debt at the start of the war. President Putin has reduced this national debt in many years 'to (almost) zero', something that the debtor countries in the West cannot say. Russian LNG simply still enters the West, India buys Russian oil and sells it on to the West. All other necessary goods go through Turkey and everything that ends in 'stan'.
what is that weird sound effect supposed to be???? the one played throughout the video... sounds to me vaguely like a bunch of people making a short yelling noise.
This is definitely one of the most well-balanced and wide ranging reports on Ukraine that I've seen to date. Russia's military expansion, the cult of war and the turn toward neo-totalitarian methods of repression, the confrontation with the West and Russia's aim of upending the international order, possible scenarios, and much more are all brilliantly covered. Looking forward to more updates in the future. Well-done, and subscribed.
@@Иван_ИвановичRussians don't have feelings. You're vampires. HOLODOMOR. Red Terror. Polish Liquidation. Molotov-Ribbontrop. How many innocents did YOUR grandparents murder for kudos from the local commissar?
They just spin all these Russia's beneficial facts in line with general Western propaganda, all the clichés you wrote - cult of war, neo - totalitarian, repression, upending international order. What a nice order that is by the way...
His idea of a neutral Ukraine would only mean someone west of Ukraine needing to become neutral as well because you know very well that Ukraine will become Russia and then he would only attack the new neutral zone aka country and the fact that Finland is on the border of Russia is a serious problem for him. Too bad dude, too bad. Go home or get attacked Mr. P
Excellent report. It must be factual or the many Russian trolls here wouldn't be here making false statements and outrageous accusations for they feel threatened by truth and truth will set you free!
Anyone that disagrees with white-liberals and their savior-complex...is now a "troll" apparently. And people like you wonder why the world hates America so much.
@@SaxSith Whataboutism = Admitting that the claim you are ranting against is true, because you can´t argue against it. Thank you for playing Orc-troll.
would have thought even a month ago Russia is not just fighting Ukraine but NATO and if anyone thinks Russia will be forced to accept NATO on its border in Ukraine better think again
Norwegian Chief of Defense, General Eirik Kristoffersen, revealed that Russia has dramatically reduced its military presence on the border with NATO member Norway. “Vladimir Putin knows very well that NATO is not a threat against Russia,” commented Kristoffersen. “If he believed we were threatening Russia, he couldn’t have moved all his troops to Ukraine.”
What are you even talking about... IF Ruzzia wins in Ukraine (they never will, not ever), then they are right at the border of NATO. If Ruzzia loses, and it most definitely will, Ukraine will immediately join NATO (or the EU at the very least, which is also an automatic Article 5 inclusion) and Ruzzia will be right at the border of NATO. So, no matter what happens, Ruzzia will end up right at the border of NATO. So now what :) Will he then attack NATO and seal his fate? If he even gets to live that long, to see that happen in the first place.
how is the sentiment for new wave of mobilization; are people willing to go fight? i hope, that we, as west, will increase financial/material/technolgical/training/intel support, but it feels to me, that all effort stands/falls with this; and god knows, that what you did already is one big "hats off"!
I would question the statement that, “Nothing suggests that the Russians are suffering from a shortage of equipment, men or any shell hunger.” The fact that T55 tanks are being committed to offensive operations, average daily shell usage is one sixth of what it was in 2022 and Russian prisoners are being taken on the frontline eight days after enlistment, suggests the opposite. The opacity and probable mendacity of Russian government finance reporting means that we cannot gauge the impact of the war on the economy and state finances. It is highly unlikely that 40% of state funding can be directed to the state security system without either adversely affecting the financing of other state institutions or drastically impacting the sovereign wealth fund. This documentary makes no reference to the recent impact of Ukrainian drones on the Russian domestic oil refinery industry, which will almost certain result in fuel shortages and further inflationary pressures. Also the assessment that Russia feels it is getting the upper hand against Ukraine takes no account of the recent assertion by Macron that France will ensure that Russia will not prevail and that the 1991 borders will be restored.
This war has been going on for two years now and Putin has not given up on conquering all of Ukraine and oppressing the people living there. But Ukraine is still alive, the Ukrainian nation is still alive and even in these moments they are bravely fighting against Russian aggression with superhuman unity and defending Europe, the free world and above all their own, beloved country, Ukraine.
@@VorbildRoß Yeha the superhuman unity, more than half the country bailed. Even in Avdiivka, hundreds waited in basements, endured bombings etc. for years, just so they wont be ukrainians when the Russians liberate them. That alone shatters your comment.
@@VorbildRoß Putin only conquered the portion of ( old ukraine) where the people are russian and were oppressed by ukrainian government installed by usa in 2014. Russia has won everything they wanted 1,5 years ago. For russia " case is closed". They have control over black sea shores.... so the american doctrine of the 1970's "" endgame ukraine" has failed. Macron has nothing to say... he is irrelevant. It is biden/trump/ shi. Nobody even cares what europeans say..... European reports say that Germany could fight for 2 days, no more.
@@attilamarics3374 One of the bitter ironies of the invasion is that the devastation inflicted by Putin’s troops has fallen disproportionately on the regions of Ukraine that Moscow claims to be protecting. The Russian army has reduced dozens of towns and cities throughout southern and eastern Ukraine to rubble and killed thousands of civilians. Millions more have been subjected to a brutal occupation regime marked by systematic torturing, executions, abductions, terror tactics, and forced deportations.
@@christianevanherck6023 I mean they already moslty rebuilt Mariupol. Thats how war works, you will destroy enemy positions. Not like there were that many civilians in these border towns, which were in a warzone since 2014. "Millions more have been subjected to a brutal occupation regime marked by systematic torturing, executions, abductions, terror tactics, and forced deportations." This is nonsense you just made up. You know in Avdiivka, hundreds of civilians hid in basements for years, endured bombings by Russia, they claim Ukraine even harassed them, and they did that for years now, just so when the Russians arrive, they wouldnt be Ukrianians anymore.
To all the innocent and good people of Moscow/Russia that it appears from our AP have been killed or injured by a apparent ISIS terrorist attack , may God's mercy and safety be with you, your loved one's and children .
What about all the people murdered by Russian troops in Ukraine. No prayers for them. You must be a MAGAt. Stick your fake prayers where the sun doesn't shine.
They tend to be a little slow, they’re not the Sensational journalists, they’re working more in “academic paste”, but I think they’re trying to give a scoop of the last 2 years
@@Evgenopolis With all this mainstream media misinformation, I wouldn't be surprised you think this way. Russia must protect it's borders AND it's people in Ukraine. How would the USA have taken it if Russia started building military bases and supply weapons to Mexico while urging them to fight the USA with promises of full military arsenals and support? How would the US react?
@@SuperBadboy560 Well, in such cases, the US usually initiates a military blockade, violating international law and ignoring UN declarations. Because they can.
Let's say Russia is producing 2k tanks per year. How many 500$ drones would be needed to destroy these tanks? 5 times more? 10 times more? Let's say 50 drones are needed to destroy one tank, that would be 25k$ per tank. Multiply with 2000 and that equals 50 mil $. Peanuts for Ukraine as long as it can keep up with air defense and manpower. Tank and infantry attacks without air dominance do not work in today's drone wars. Both sides experienced it with disastrous results.
No ways 50 drones to take out one tank.......stop being ignorant, one drone is enough to destroy however 3 seemingly is the maximum to be used in one tank.
@@avuazahc1966 You are failing to see my point. My calculation is referring to 50 drones just to make a point of the fact that doesn't matter how many tanks are produced, 500$ drones will destroy them at a competitive price. And calling someone ignorant while you can't understand what are you reading is saying something about you.
I don't care how much more Russia has in equipment and people over Ukraine. What matters is the will. The will to survive. The will to keep their freedoms. The will to have a better life. The will to have the opportunity for fair justice. None of these traits are evident with the Russians. Ukraine, however, demonstrates this every day and is paying with blood. They have a legitimate reason to fight and will continue even if they are abandoned, which can make them more dangerous to the unsuspecting and egotistical Russians.
The strongest will in this story is among the people of the Donetsk and Lugansk republics. To hold out for so many years and not escape to a large and capacious Russia from the forces of a superior enemy! This is truly an iron will!
@@Evgenopolis Without Russian involvement, there would have been no self-proclaimed Donetsk people’s republic and no so-called ‘Russian spring’ in Donetsk and Luhansk. Igor Girkin has openly admitted that the first shots and, therefore, the violence in the Donbas was effectively provoked by his men.
@@christianevanherck6023 Without US involvement and intervention, Yugoslavia would still be with us and several new self-proclaimed republics would not have emerged. Also, without US intervention, there would have been a million more people in Iraq and ISIS would not have appeared. And Igor Girkin lied (or misunderstood) - the first shots and deaths occurred in Kyiv during the Maidan. And in many other parts of the country. Girkin talked about the fact that there was resistance in a specific area, where he came with his group and joined the rebels. Also, in any conflict, volunteers and mercenaries participate on different sides - and Ukraine is no exception. The same "Girkins" were on the side of the Maidan.
@@Evgenopolis Get your facts straight! Following Tito’s death in 1980, leaders such as Slobodan Milosevic rose to power and took advantage of the weakening state by utilising Serbian ultra-nationalism to fan the flames of conflict throughout the various neighbouring countries. As the rise of nationalism grew, Slovenia followed by Croatia voted for independence and broke away from Yugoslavia by 1991. On 29th February, and 1st March 1992 a referendum on independence was held in Bosnia. 99.7% of the those who voted declared “yes” and thus Independence was declared on 3rd March 1992. As Bosnian Serb political leadership boycotted the independence, the Serbian forces attacked Bosnia leading to four years of brutal ethnic cleansing, genocide, and crimes against humanity all up until 1995 when the Dayton Agreement was signed.
@@Evgenopolis Saddam Hussein was known for using terror against his own people. Saddam's regime brought about the deaths of at least 250,000 Iraqis and committed war crimes in Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. To maintain power he used fear, intimidation and torture like few other dictators in history. Convinced of his own invincibility, Saddam provoked an American invasion-and lost both his power and his life.
1/2 million ukraiinian older died, 5 time les dead in the ruin troops And now Ukrainian soldiers desert massively or surrender because they know as prisoners they ar well treated The commanding of Ukrainian army is very weak probably they were trained by US special forces that trained the afghan army
REALLY PROFESSIONAL SOLDIERS " RUSSIA "IN WHAT F~~~ING SENSE ??? I DON'T THINK THAT GUYS RIPPING OFF THE ARMY IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE COULD EVER BE CALLED PROFESSIONAL !!
IT MEANS THEY WERE TRAINED SOLDIERS WHO’S OCCUPATION WAS TO BE A SOLDIER AND NOT JUST MAN FROM THE DRFAT WHO SPENT FEW MONTHS IN THE ARMY. THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM ARE TOP NOTCH SOLDIER🙄
@@Evgenopolis He gave the basic description of a "soldier". A professional soldier is a whole different thing and that's what the OP was saying. Hooah?
All these documentaries never fail to miss some positive stuff for Russia, they have recently made serious investments in gold rich African countries and have been steadily increasing gold reserves over the last 2 decades.
If Russia “wins” any objective, do sanctioning nations have to lift sanctions? Sanctions are a real demonstration of joint nations extreme opposition to and disagreement with Russia’s war. I think sanctions should continue indefinitely until Russia withdraws from Ukraine. If this threat was issued to Russia, for them to be a permanent pariah state, what do you think they would do? I’d like to ask this question to the experts in this video.
If would know not so old history u would know that Russian mind set does allow heavy losses. Even IF its 400k they havs planty to send. And IF u look in not so old history u would know how western powers operate, meaning- they have so far fuckd over every partner in the end. That being sad-there can be no winners in this case.
@@MrShuraj How do i know this in the era of information? Idk, youre a big boy, i feel like you can figure it out. But, after of a lot of thinking, you still cant come to a conclusion, feel free to come back and ask again.
Putin and Russia has made it very clear not to move West to Europe, but for Ukraine to remain neutral and act as a buffer between Russia and EU. Let's see how many more men Ukraine have to lose, meanwhile NATO has already been sending their soldiers to Ukraine to die in the Russian meatgrinder. I can say that EU is the stupidest region in this century. LOL
From the Polish perspective, the first target to hit, if Ukraine loses the war with Russia, might be a country in the northeast. While that is probable to a high extent, it might also be true that Russia could likely attack a particular country 🇷🇴 in its southwestern neighborhood because Moldova cannot stand in the way. Russia might find its natural borders in the southwest to be along the Carpathian mountains. There is not a whole lot of time left for the West to work harder in building its defense.
War mobilization and the expansion of law enforcement agencies, particularly the Federal Security Service, carries economic risks, as it obliges the government to continue to make expensive payments to these groups even when faced with budgetary challenges. These payments are an economic time bomb: high wages are extremely difficult to reduce, and doing so for the main pillar of Putin’s rule-the army and security forces-is not an option.
I would imagine the occupation of Moldova, Belarus, Azerbaijan and Georgia would proceed an attack on NATO. Though if putin believes European and USA leaders are weak he may feel confident to try a quick grab for the Baltic states. Thoughbit would be a huge mistake destined to fail miserably.
@@MrJerry101 what if Ukraine is happy with 25% of russia. Surely you will be happy to make that sacrifice for peace. Ofcourse you won't be happy. Though the big point is that Putins fascist regime must be defeated in Ukraine if there is to be a lasting peace.
Многие тезисы опираются только на заявления российских официальных лиц - а они врут непрерывно. Например 500 000 контрактников - цифра не подтверждаемая никакими независимыми подсчетами, только заявлениями Путина и Медведева. так что выводы также сомнительны.
Назови другие официальные лица, других стран 0 про всех смогу сказать, что врут непрерывно. Тебе ничего не остается как основываться на официальной документальной информации. Все остальное - возня в грязи домыслов.
Если собрать данные из разных источников , то так или иначе выходит, что армия РФ увиличилась более чем на 300 тысяч контрактников. Я имею в виду различные документы по обеспечения армии, по штатному составу, размеру фронта и масштабу боевых действий. Сколько точно действительно подтверить невозможно из независимых источников.
ok if russia can produce as many tank as 100 to 150 per mo, I must assume there is talk of T80 and T90, can I then get an explanation if russia has so much and can produce so much how can it be that we see russia using T62, T64, T55 and getting artelie from norkoria and drones from iran, it does not indicate they have richlit and are we talking about man losses can hardly be equal as ukrine does not use meat loss tactics
Russia cannot produce 150 T90 tanks per month, if that were the case you would see a lot more T90 tanks in Ukraine, the high number of Russian production comes from the reserves, which are mainly from the old stocks of the T50-T80 come. If the loss rate of Russian tanks does not decrease, sooner or later Russia will have a big problem.
@@trogdortpennypacker6160 As long as a Russian soldier is moving in a contested territory, commanders can report back to Moscow that they retain control. So they keep sending wave after wave of soldiers to die, in order to maintain their charade.
That would cost many many more lives. Actually, from a humane point of view, it will be better if Russia wins. But this is not beneficial for the United States and NATO.
@@Evgenopolis Humane? One of the bitter ironies of the invasion is that the devastation inflicted by Putin’s troops has fallen disproportionately on the regions of Ukraine that Moscow claims to be protecting. The Russian army has reduced dozens of towns and cities throughout southern and eastern Ukraine to rubble and killed thousands of civilians. Millions more have been subjected to a brutal occupation regime marked by systematic torturing, executions, abductions, terror tactics, and forced deportations.
We are you Ukrainian? Get off the gas global policy of us has historicaly been a fiasco. Look what the cia did to iran in the 1950s we create problems not fix them
In 43:45 He said rainy day.What that means. Or maybe he's thinking of detonating a nuclear bomb in the air in a certain place so that the radiarsion in that spot is raining straight down?
Putin is basically saying that he wants to spare those warheads until a time comes when he needs them. In english "for a rainy day" or "to save something for a rainy day" means that someone doesnt intend on using something right now, but instead wants to keep it until a time comes when it is desperately needed.
For more stable nation it needs a singular leader surrounded with brillant, talented and more importantly solid patriotic public servant. Rival party or parties always has an opposing agendas that can be easily manipulated by enemies where they can capitalize on the situation to destroy and sabotage.
Starting off with asking the question “Is russias military strong enough to defeat Ukraine on the battlefield” automatically assumes I follow western propaganda efforts.
The only part I disliked was the sound effect made when you flash text to the screen. It sounds like a dog bark outside, and I had to get up and look out all of the windows before deciding it was the tv. Im not sure why you'd think an effect was needed, but if you must include it, make it a recognizable common effect so we know what it is. But its a great video.
It's wrong to include military assets into any economic statistics. Those don't get you anything except more stuff to shoot. At the very least, I think it's definitely not something you normally profit from monetarily.
I enjoy watching / listening to your videos. I commute a couple of hours a day and will set up a playlist in the morning and listen to it throughout the day. When you have a foreign language speaker and just put subtitles under it, that part of the video is useless to me. I skip it. Sometimes I have time to catch it later in the evenings, but more generally, I just don't get to watch / listen to it. Dubbed over speech is a much better solution. Providing the actual foreign language does not make it more authentic. I have to trust your written translations. Please help.
The average life expectancy for a Russian male is about 58. This along with people that left, and terrible demographics should be factored in when it comes to Russia being willing to speed up their demise. Russia's existential threat is their demographics, not Ukraine or even NATO, of course unless they try to invade NATO
I have a very close friend in central Russia, she once told me that "Everything in Russia is sh*t, EXCEPT the piss..". This was a couple of years before Russia invaded Crimea. Having lived in Russia I can vouch for her words... (I communicate with her several times each week and I'm informed that things are becoming more and more difficult in everyday life.).
I like to know the names and professions of the people speaking so I can check their bona fides. Without that information it's just random people saying anything. Most documentaries put the speaker's title on screen as they speak. That is why I down voted this video and will not watch this channel again.
58:53 "You can fool some of the people all of the time, these are the ones to concentrate on."..... George Bush 2001 and that's what this video is all about.
Great documentary no one can predict the future but for me, it's hard to imagine any executive from a Western company having the courage to propose to it's board of directors to make a sizable investment in Russia plus it seems that Russia's credit rating is pretty much done for the foreseeable future.
Russia’s inflation rate has already surpassed 7 percent, forcing the Bank of Russia to maintain interest rates at 16 percent. Despite these high interest rates, businesses and households continue to borrow, indicating high inflation expectations. This means that the key rate will not return to single digits any time soon.
@@christianevanherck6023 have you checked the inflation in the US? The number is nothing less than 14% if its not manipulated by the Biden administration.
Russia doesn't need Western credit. Russia has Oil/natural gas, BRICS or strong military allies with China. The sanctions made them stringer. Now in a war economy they are becoming more and more scary, while the US is focused on LGBT+ Rights and spending money it does not have. Breaks my heart. It's all about political types in the US making money for the Military Industrial Complex. 😖
@@MrJerry101 At the end of 2024, a 5 year agreement expires governing one of the oldest and biggest economic links between Russia and Europe: the transit of Russian gas through the territory of Ukraine. Kyiv has already said it will not extend the agreement. Russia would take a financial hit if it could no longer transport its gas via Ukraine. There are no equivalent alternative markets for the Yamal gas currently sold to Europe, and that will not change significantly, even with the construction of the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline to China (no earlier than 2030) and an LNG plant on the Baltic Sea (currently planned for 2026-2027). The combined capacity of those two new projects is approximately half of the volume by which supplies to Europe have already decreased.
If an American president performed as good as Putin, I would also vote for him for life. Russia went from utterly poor to a world economic power that seemingly gets respect from all nations today- Could not say that prior to Putin! Hes PUTIN' it to em!
In the same way that Russia had to retreat from Afghanistan for her loses 14,000 men and a plane shot down with stinger missiles A DAY and numerous loses in tanks and artillery, it will also retreat from Ukraine. Putin will face the same end than Hitler, way too many enemies, too many armies against him, too many miles on the front line. Europe along with all the armies combined and a 17 trillion dollar economy plus the help of the USA will erode the Russian economy (Only slightly bigger than Italy) day by day, little by little until start reaching the standards of living of her citizens and specially the interests of Russian powerful companies. Neither Europe or the United States can tolerate that the natural resources of Siberia fall in the hands of China.
Only problem is this narrative which was continuously vomited on a daily basis is untrue. As long as Russia prolongs the war, it will be tougher for the EU and US to support Ukraine. The US citizens are already against sending more money to Ukraine, meanwhile EU, being the cowards they are couldn't even last 1 wave against Russia let alone invading the motherland. Russia is doing better than EU countries in 2023. The only thing we see clearly is that EU and US do not conform to any international law by illegally sanctioning Russia and confiscating their reserves in EU. Say whatever you want, that is illegal. It sets a precedent whereby whoever pisses US/EU off, will get their money frozen/confiscated..maybe not today, but in the near future.
The only army where the soldiers have to buy their own equipment and get ripped off
But.., their widowed wifes gets a fur coat. Right?
@@oneshothunter9877 No, don't be silly. They get a jar of pickled onions.
@@plum_bit
Probably right.
So sad.
Where do you get these crazy ideas from? Ohh what can we expect when your source of information is the shamelessly lying MSM.
@@oneshothunter9877 Not really, have you seen what today's daily Russian living costs? The money is gone before you know it.
Putin’s lies and excuses grow more and more ridiculous
One must admit it quite resembles the US. Very peculiar indeed. Power to the working people ✊✊✊
How much did you get paid for this propaganda
The Soviet Union was always a Russian-dominated empire as demonstrated by the 1968 invasion of Czechslovakia. But even during that era the political allegiances at the highest levels still allowed for a leader to be ousted. Brezhnev was part of a cabal that ousted an aging Khrushchev. There is no such off ramp for Russia today. There are no senior leaders that can oust Putin peacefully. It's more like Bashar Assad's regime in Syria with concentric rings of loyalists whose own position, wealth, and safety are reliant on the leader staying in power.
Now a shift is happening with Artur Ivanov, Acting State Councillor of the RF, being under arrest. It was Shoigu who brought Ivanov to the ministry. Ivanov’s arrest is in no way a fight against corruption - in Russia everyone steals as much as they can. In the Russian system, each official has a separate folder in the FSB, and when a signal comes from above that a person needs to be processed, they take it off the shelf and put it into action.
A person working for the Russian government, even if he has palaces, yachts and expensive cars, actually does not possess any of this. It does not belong to him and can be taken away at any moment, and he is sent to prison.
His arrest indicates that a serious intra-clan struggle has begun in Putin’s system. Ivanov’s place is very profitable, now the struggle for this place will begin and all the contenders will rush to snitch on each other in the fight for that place.
Putin created a system, like any dictator, where he pits everyone against each other. His task is to ensure that no one can unite so much as to become a threat to his own power.
Spot on ! Thats why Putin is so rattled by the recent seizure of Russian 'assets' for Ukraine. Then there's the other fact - almost all of the former soviet states dont want anything further to do with this crap ! - Latvia Estonia Lithuania Poland former Czechoslovakia Kazakhstan and on it goes !!! And those that claim to want to be part of Putins CCCP V2.0 eg Chechnya and Belarus also dont want it but unfortunately have brutal puppet governments in power...
It never was.
The soviet union tried to destroy many parts of russian culture in the spheres of art,music,literature and even the orthodox church.
Many russians have died because of the poor leadership of the soviet union at times.
i agree, russians were always in the helping jobs where they worked to helped all the people of the soviet union. we owe russians a lot for working hard. 🫡🇷🇺
It depends how you look at it. The Soviet Union was a federation of states. Belarus, Ukraine for example had their own Constitutions which changed a few times. At the beginning of the UN, Ukraine even had its own place in the United Nations General Assembly. And the Soviet Leaders were mostly from Russia, bit also from other nationalities within the Soviet Union.
The leaders of the Soviet Union came from a variety of nationalities within the USSR. Here are some of the key leaders and their nationalities:
1. Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924) - Russian. Lenin was born in Simbirsk (now Ulyanovsk), Russia. He was the leader of the Bolshevik Revolution and the first head of the Soviet state.
2. Joseph Stalin (1924-1953) - Georgian. Born Ioseb Jughashvili in Gori, Georgia, Stalin became the General Secretary of the Communist Party and later the Premier of the Soviet Union.
3. Nikita Khrushchev (1953-1964) - Ukrainian. Although born in Kalinovka, Russia, Khrushchev spent much of his political career in Ukraine and identified closely with it.
4. Leonid Brezhnev (1964-1982) - Ukrainian. Brezhnev was born in Kamenskoye (now Dnipro), Ukraine. He led the Soviet Union during a period of significant stagnation.
5. Yuri Andropov (1982-1984) - Russian. Andropov was born in Nagutskaya, Russia. Before becoming the General Secretary, he was the head of the KGB.
6. Konstantin Chernenko (1984-1985) - Russian. Chernenko was born in Bolshaya Tes, Russia. His short tenure was marked by continued stagnation.
7. Mikhail Gorbachev (1985-1991) - Russian Gorbachev was born in Privolnoye, Russia. He was the last leader of the Soviet Union, known for his policies of glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring).
8. **Georgy Malenkov** (1953) - Russian. Malenkov briefly succeeded Stalin before being replaced by Khrushchev.
9. **Alexei Kosygin** (1964-1980) - Russian. Kosygin was a significant figure during Brezhnev's era as the Premier of the Soviet Union.
These leaders represented the diverse ethnic and national composition of the Soviet Union, although Russians and Ukrainians were the most common.
Do not forget that Russian is mainly a bridge language, like English. There are more than 100 different languages in Russia.
State of Russia: 💩
I Agree with your comment
except when it's pss
State of EU and Western countries: Also 💩
Not fit to belong to NATO. ⚓
State of corruption
State of immorality
State of confusion
Little (technical) criticism: too many swoosh sounds (distractive, too loud and too repetitive), background music also too repetitive, in a 60 minute video there need to be a wider sound/music palette, also: please consider pauses of few seconds between chapters or key statements, otherwise it can become a challenge to swallow that many dense informations in 60 minutes … content wise: TOP JOB
It’s bloody awful and one reason why I appreciate our BBC’s quality of documentary making.
@@pifflepocklewell, 2 be fair: I guess they don't have the same production budget like the BBC
Good criticism 👍
He's pointing at the moon and you're looking at his finger. Troll better Igor.
What a moaner. The documentary is brilliant
Very good and very informativ. Thank you very much.
Informative? Are you kidding me? - Everything in this article is a bold face lie and pro Ukrainian propaganda.
I thought this was going to be a three day picnic 😮 Power to Ukraine ❤
Blessed are the meek, they shall inherit the earth. J.C. 🦋
Can you tell me about Stephan Bandera's history in the Ukraine, the Orange revolution 2014, Midon, and the Azov Battalion?
Slava Russia. Look at a WW2 map.
POwer of Ukraine 😂😂😂
Do u like Nazis?
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 Anything Russia proposes is a bad deal. Eastern Europe chose NATO. it is NOT up to ruzzia to dictate anything to us.
Remember when they promised to defend Ukraine if only Ukraine gave them all their nukes?
How did that turn out?
Exactly! The internet is full of vatnik idiots who don't know shit about what they're talking about. There is a fucking big reason why all eastern European countries want to join NATO (and EU). The reason is displayed for all to see in Ukraine right now and in Georgia several years ago. NATO doesn't expand... Countries ASK to become a member.
You have 0 understading of the thing syou are trying to talk about. child.
apparently... Russia can dictate it. they did it in Georgia and in Ukraine. FACTS DON"T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS lol
Right now they are defending Ukraine against nato and the west... So nato/west should just leave ukraine and peace will reign.
In February 2016, Sergey Lavrov claimed "Russia never violated the Budapest memorandum. It contained only one obligation, not to attack Ukraine with nukes."
By signing the Budapest Memorandum (5 Dec 1994) Russia agreed to the following:
1. Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders.
2. Refrain from the threat or the use of force against the signatory.
3. Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by the signatory of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.
4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used".
5. Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against the signatory.
6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.
Thanks for English version !
"alreadyy superior force"
ahhaha... i despise russians for history as estonian....
but the level of propaganda and BS west produces... is comical and astounding...
even 50 years of soviet union didnt produce such levels of brainwash and propaganda
as someone who closely monitors this war...
all the data they present, they literally Lie.. either now, or then...
because the numbers literally always change... are boomers really that dumb.. that tey dont understand u have a backlog and archives u can check later... what they sayd then and what they say now and that their lies have short legs?
1million troops, ROFL... good one. Entire Ukraine reserve is 500k, but they deployed 1million troops...
whatever, the size was literally more or less equal in the start of the war....
Also not a single Russian in Russian military who fight against Russians... they dont drat from moscow or peterburg, where actual people who you think are Russians (Muscovites) live...
they draft from rural areas... ethnic groups who are not russian , even voilunteer Chinese ...
I guess to west Russia is one big lump , not a diverse federation of republics (in reality most diverse country in the world ethnically)
just like sokme people just say Africa, like it's a country lol...
Tbh it's a load a propaganda 😂 fs man half the stuff is lies and can be easily proved lies, way do ppl take these ppl at there word, this world is full a weirdos man, how ppl think now is beyond me common sense is out the winda these day
Couldn’t agree more!!!
@@calvinp9 - NONSENSE!
Any country that took 4 years & suffered 20m dead in order to defeat Hitler was never going to lose to Ukraine. In WW2 Stalin made serious errors in the beginning before letting the generals fight the war. In any case it was never in China's interest to see Russia defeated.
"If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. One-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war. No one talks about this officially, and Stalin never, I think, left any written traces of his opinion, but I can say that he expressed this view several times in conversations with me." Nikita Kruschev.
@@christianevanherck6023 Where did you find this quote? I tried Googling, but cannot find any credible source (besides RadioFreeEurope, Quora and Reddit lmao).
You're conveniently omitting the fact it was the soviet Union and not Russia...
And Ukranian men were the highest contributers to that death toll 🤔🤔
And if you take into account all other modern ex soviet states death tolls, then the actual toll of ethnic Russians was a fraction of the other states contribution.
Similar to current strategy, throwing the ethnic russians and prisoners into the storm squads before themselves
Ukrainians were the majority of deaths on the eastern front, considering Ukraine *was* the eastern front.
@@christianevanherck6023this is bs
Soviets always denied that lend lease was necessary to their victory
They always said that ussr would have won without it anyway
One factor that often seems to get overlooked,
Russias demographic decline cannot continue to uphold the rising costs of the war in terms of human cost.
Yes, Putin destroyed Russia. The demographic decline is too large.
Russia is under pressure. Theyare yeah Russia experience in a serious problem and need to act in a very very prudently in managing the future affairs they maybe forced before then maybe forced to act accordingly with with nuclear weapons
Nuclear options are being forced upon them
No problem. Russia has no borders. Europe is full of new Russians.
@@rabinashar7676 Utter bollocks. NOTHING is being forced upon them. If they left Ukraine now, there would be ZERO threat.
Very insightful. Thanks for posting.
Bot?
Troll!
Communist in the comment section i see
Let me tell you what I think. I am by no means a strategist when it comes to military operations. But, I do know how bullies think and operate. I will get to that in a moment. But, let me point out something first.
We (the US) doesn't always plan ahead. The 2003 invasion of Iraq is the best example of that. It was a costly and lengthy operation that didn't end well. Compare that with the 1991 well planned Gulf War that decimated Iraq's military in a matter of weeks. Same country, different outcomes based on planning.
Now, the US has a plan in place if China invades Taiwan. This plan would send China back to the mainland licking their wounds. I have no doubt it would work because it is well planned. Now I ask, why didn't we have a plan in place when Russia invaded Ukraine? The best we could do is give Ukraine some money, a few weapons, and wish them luck? The US should have had a well publicized plan in place letting Russia know that if they invade any country, it would be a very costly and painful mistake- just as we have warned China against invading Taiwan.
That's based on my opening paragraph on how you deal with bullies. The moment Russia invaded Ukraine, we should have made it so costly and painful that Russia would have done an about face. It's too late now. Our unplanned and unorganized response has lead Ukraine to a slow and painful death. Any bold action we take now may escalate into an all out war. Putin already feels emboldened by our half-assed response.
Would a swift and painful response in the beginning led to an all out war? I really don't think so. Putin, like any other bully, would have been shocked and caught off guard getting his ass handed to him.
I could be wrong. Then again, I am a truck mechanic. Not a war planner
You are wrong. Couple of
Things china would beat the USA in and all out war of china vs USA without Japan and nato. Second if the USA is as so powerful they would have just send troops on the ground in Ukraine and ended the war. Also we are the bully in this situation we started the war in Ukraine and didn’t think it would happen. USA had a plan to take over Ukraine but with politics not military power and it backed fired on them when Putin started annexing land from the west in Ukraine. USA is the biggest bully in the world, we bombed countries not even part of a wars, just so they wouldn’t join wars. Remember when we backed the people of Afghanistan to fight Russia? Then after Russia left we invaded them and then called them terrorist, Ronald Regan even dedicated a whole satellite to the fighters in Afghanistan, he said they are the ideal fighters of freedom, but now they are a terrorist group 😂😂USA = big big bully
Sounds like a bully needs a mirror
I would say, that this is not so simple. Ukraine is not USA teritory, nor they are part of NATO or EU, interfearing or open attack on russian forces basically means all out war. By I agree that initial response of western world should be much more severe. Without any doubts. Without openly stated disgust and Anger of populus against Russias aggression I Think eu leadera would try to ease whole situation down. Sorry for my bad english it’s not my first or second language
@@maciejjaremowicz2646well I think the USA should of not had the cia in Ukraine backing riots and protest with Nazi backed militias to overthrow the government in 2013. Putin asked the cia and the USA to leave Ukraine and stop messing with their political system and stop trying to make them a nato country. Ukraine was meant to be a neutral state not a part of any nato country. The USA should stop funding this war they started don’t blame Russia for this war not even in the slightest
@@paracosmm79 Who drove with tanks on Ukrainian sovereign territory in February 24th 2022? If Ukrainian people whant to be a part of NATO and EU, why russia wants to stop that, why they have to be neutral? Why they would have to do what putler said? I'm not gonna comment this stuff about USA, protests were caused by Janukovych being a puppet to russia government, and all his decisions came from Kremlin.
What is an underexposed fact in this documentary is the fact that it is not mentioned that Russia had almost no national debt at the start of the war. President Putin has reduced this national debt in many years 'to (almost) zero', something that the debtor countries in the West cannot say. Russian LNG simply still enters the West, India buys Russian oil and sells it on to the West. All other necessary goods go through Turkey and everything that ends in 'stan'.
"HE TELLS HIS COUNTRYMEN: THE WEST HAS BROUGHT A WAR TO UKRAINE"
He tells the truth!
Since 10 years. Ask Victoria
what is that weird sound effect supposed to be???? the one played throughout the video... sounds to me vaguely like a bunch of people making a short yelling noise.
A failure off the audio engineer i guess.
It creates a more alarming vibe to the documentary. But makes it annoying for the viewer who doesn't need the noise.
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦
Boy the west had a weak argument.
The claim that young boys, the new recruits do not end up at the front is dead, flat wrong.
As a Russian I can say that young conscripts don't participate in the war, only volunteer, professional contract army
@@arty5876stop capping bot, meatgrinder!
@@KilogramskkMy schoolmate is there from november 2022 👀
Putin skis magadan death to ruZZia @@arty5876
I worry that they're snatched out of basic training before they even finish basic training that's why they're so f****** confused
The EU, NATO and FJB can't find their ass with both hands.
Money laundering is a poor foreign policy.
This is definitely one of the most well-balanced and wide ranging reports on Ukraine that I've seen to date. Russia's military expansion, the cult of war and the turn toward neo-totalitarian methods of repression, the confrontation with the West and Russia's aim of upending the international order, possible scenarios, and much more are all brilliantly covered. Looking forward to more updates in the future. Well-done, and subscribed.
Нам в России искренне жаль людей с вашим уровнем интеллекта)
Much better than the BBC
@@Иван_ИвановичRussians don't have feelings. You're vampires. HOLODOMOR. Red Terror. Polish Liquidation. Molotov-Ribbontrop. How many innocents did YOUR grandparents murder for kudos from the local commissar?
They just spin all these Russia's beneficial facts in line with general Western propaganda, all the clichés you wrote - cult of war, neo - totalitarian, repression, upending international order. What a nice order that is by the way...
Krushchev stole 100,000 square miles of Russia. Putin wants it =back
His idea of a neutral Ukraine would only mean someone west of Ukraine needing to become neutral as well because you know very well that Ukraine will become Russia and then he would only attack the new neutral zone aka country and the fact that Finland is on the border of Russia is a serious problem for him.
Too bad dude, too bad.
Go home or get attacked Mr. P
Stop talking nonsense
@@GoranMilojevic-o5jcommies love talking nonsense
Putler BS is what you are repeating here. Utter dribble;
Excellent report. It must be factual or the many Russian trolls here wouldn't be here making false statements and outrageous accusations for they feel threatened by truth and truth will set you free!
Anyone that disagrees with white-liberals and their savior-complex...is now a "troll" apparently.
And people like you wonder why the world hates America so much.
How about the Anglo-Saxon trolls ?!😅
Как же страшно, очень боюсь истины🤡
@@SaxSith Whataboutism = Admitting that the claim you are ranting against is true, because you can´t argue against it. Thank you for playing Orc-troll.
@@Omega0850Whataboutism is an empty term made up to excuse hypocrisy.
would have thought even a month ago Russia is not just fighting Ukraine but NATO and if anyone thinks Russia will be forced to accept NATO on its border in Ukraine better think again
Norwegian Chief of Defense, General Eirik Kristoffersen, revealed that Russia has dramatically reduced its military presence on the border with NATO member Norway. “Vladimir Putin knows very well that NATO is not a threat against Russia,” commented Kristoffersen. “If he believed we were threatening Russia, he couldn’t have moved all his troops to Ukraine.”
What are you even talking about...
IF Ruzzia wins in Ukraine (they never will, not ever), then they are right at the border of NATO.
If Ruzzia loses, and it most definitely will, Ukraine will immediately join NATO (or the EU at the very least, which is also an automatic Article 5 inclusion) and Ruzzia will be right at the border of NATO.
So, no matter what happens, Ruzzia will end up right at the border of NATO.
So now what :) Will he then attack NATO and seal his fate? If he even gets to live that long, to see that happen in the first place.
The description of the battlefield situation is exactly how we think of it in Ukraine
how is the sentiment for new wave of mobilization; are people willing to go fight? i hope, that we, as west, will increase financial/material/technolgical/training/intel support, but it feels to me, that all effort stands/falls with this; and god knows, that what you did already is one big "hats off"!
NAZI occupiers
i like this channel
Fight Ukraine fight for your right Ukraine don't let anyone stop you.
LOL don't forget Ukraine wanted this war :) becareful what you wish for.
@@scionkai
And let us not forget that Putin is actually an admitted pedo.
@@scionkaiLol! The most stupid comment here 😂😂 Of course Ukraine wanted to be invaded by Russia! Genius!!
@@pourtoukistYeah, he's getting smarter 🙏😭
@@scionkaiNo! Ukraine didn’t want this war, Putin did! 😡
Great documentary. Thank you
I would question the statement that, “Nothing suggests that the Russians are suffering from a shortage of equipment, men or any shell hunger.” The fact that T55 tanks are being committed to offensive operations, average daily shell usage is one sixth of what it was in 2022 and Russian prisoners are being taken on the frontline eight days after enlistment, suggests the opposite.
The opacity and probable mendacity of Russian government finance reporting means that we cannot gauge the impact of the war on the economy and state finances. It is highly unlikely that 40% of state funding can be directed to the state security system without either adversely affecting the financing of other state institutions or drastically impacting the sovereign wealth fund.
This documentary makes no reference to the recent impact of Ukrainian drones on the Russian domestic oil refinery industry, which will almost certain result in fuel shortages and further inflationary pressures. Also the assessment that Russia feels it is getting the upper hand against Ukraine takes no account of the recent assertion by Macron that France will ensure that Russia will not prevail and that the 1991 borders will be restored.
This war has been going on for two years now and Putin has not given up on conquering all of Ukraine and oppressing the people living there. But Ukraine is still alive, the Ukrainian nation is still alive and even in these moments they are bravely fighting against Russian aggression with superhuman unity and defending Europe, the free world and above all their own, beloved country, Ukraine.
@@VorbildRoß Yeha the superhuman unity, more than half the country bailed. Even in Avdiivka, hundreds waited in basements, endured bombings etc. for years, just so they wont be ukrainians when the Russians liberate them. That alone shatters your comment.
@@VorbildRoß Putin only conquered the portion of ( old ukraine) where the people are russian and were oppressed by ukrainian government installed by usa in 2014. Russia has won everything they wanted 1,5 years ago. For russia " case is closed". They have control over black sea shores.... so the american doctrine of the 1970's "" endgame ukraine" has failed.
Macron has nothing to say... he is irrelevant. It is biden/trump/ shi. Nobody even cares what europeans say..... European reports say that Germany could fight for 2 days, no more.
@@attilamarics3374 One of the bitter ironies of the invasion is that the devastation inflicted by Putin’s troops has fallen disproportionately on the regions of Ukraine that Moscow claims to be protecting. The Russian army has reduced dozens of towns and cities throughout southern and eastern Ukraine to rubble and killed thousands of civilians. Millions more have been subjected to a brutal occupation regime marked by systematic torturing, executions, abductions, terror tactics, and forced deportations.
@@christianevanherck6023 I mean they already moslty rebuilt Mariupol. Thats how war works, you will destroy enemy positions. Not like there were that many civilians in these border towns, which were in a warzone since 2014.
"Millions more have been subjected to a brutal occupation regime marked by systematic torturing, executions, abductions, terror tactics, and forced deportations."
This is nonsense you just made up.
You know in Avdiivka, hundreds of civilians hid in basements for years, endured bombings by Russia, they claim Ukraine even harassed them, and they did that for years now, just so when the Russians arrive, they wouldnt be Ukrianians anymore.
To all the innocent and good people of Moscow/Russia that it appears from our AP have been killed or injured by a apparent ISIS terrorist attack , may God's mercy and safety be with you, your loved one's and children .
What about all the people murdered by Russian troops in Ukraine. No prayers for them. You must be a MAGAt. Stick your fake prayers where the sun doesn't shine.
It's hard to believe that this was released a day ago, it's analysis is from 18 months ago
Very true 👍
It's very ridiculous.the Media is running out of things to say
Exactly
Just regular russian propaganda
They tend to be a little slow, they’re not the Sensational journalists, they’re working more in “academic paste”, but I think they’re trying to give a scoop of the last 2 years
Russia is a bad joke
Deal with it cos the west is one big failure.
And yet one of the most dangerous in the world
@@Evgenopolis With all this mainstream media misinformation, I wouldn't be surprised you think this way. Russia must protect it's borders AND it's people in Ukraine. How would the USA have taken it if Russia started building military bases and supply weapons to Mexico while urging them to fight the USA with promises of full military arsenals and support? How would the US react?
@@SuperBadboy560 Well, in such cases, the US usually initiates a military blockade, violating international law and ignoring UN declarations. Because they can.
@@SuperBadboy560bot
Very informative doc I will follow on my feed
JESUS CHRIST
THE PRINCE OF PEACE
Tell that to Patriarch Kirill
Amaizing to see how many people want to vote for a guy who admires Putin, and wants to be like him.
Let's say Russia is producing 2k tanks per year. How many 500$ drones would be needed to destroy these tanks? 5 times more? 10 times more? Let's say 50 drones are needed to destroy one tank, that would be 25k$ per tank. Multiply with 2000 and that equals 50 mil $. Peanuts for Ukraine as long as it can keep up with air defense and manpower. Tank and infantry attacks without air dominance do not work in today's drone wars. Both sides experienced it with disastrous results.
No ways 50 drones to take out one tank.......stop being ignorant, one drone is enough to destroy however 3 seemingly is the maximum to be used in one tank.
@@avuazahc1966 You are failing to see my point. My calculation is referring to 50 drones just to make a point of the fact that doesn't matter how many tanks are produced, 500$ drones will destroy them at a competitive price. And calling someone ignorant while you can't understand what are you reading is saying something about you.
Russians are fighting with shavels 😊😊😊😊 Ukrainians are winning...in latest news
Nope. Nobody said that recently
Objective,well balanced,brilliant.
Each country is different impressive the same way
I don't care how much more Russia has in equipment and people over Ukraine. What matters is the will. The will to survive. The will to keep their freedoms. The will to have a better life. The will to have the opportunity for fair justice. None of these traits are evident with the Russians. Ukraine, however, demonstrates this every day and is paying with blood. They have a legitimate reason to fight and will continue even if they are abandoned, which can make them more dangerous to the unsuspecting and egotistical Russians.
The strongest will in this story is among the people of the Donetsk and Lugansk republics. To hold out for so many years and not escape to a large and capacious Russia from the forces of a superior enemy! This is truly an iron will!
@@Evgenopolis Without Russian involvement, there would have been no self-proclaimed Donetsk people’s republic and no so-called ‘Russian spring’ in Donetsk and Luhansk. Igor Girkin has openly admitted that the first shots and, therefore, the violence in the Donbas was effectively provoked by his men.
@@christianevanherck6023 Without US involvement and intervention, Yugoslavia would still be with us and several new self-proclaimed republics would not have emerged. Also, without US intervention, there would have been a million more people in Iraq and ISIS would not have appeared.
And Igor Girkin lied (or misunderstood) - the first shots and deaths occurred in Kyiv during the Maidan. And in many other parts of the country. Girkin talked about the fact that there was resistance in a specific area, where he came with his group and joined the rebels.
Also, in any conflict, volunteers and mercenaries participate on different sides - and Ukraine is no exception. The same "Girkins" were on the side of the Maidan.
@@Evgenopolis Get your facts straight! Following Tito’s death in 1980, leaders such as Slobodan Milosevic rose to power and took advantage of the weakening state by utilising Serbian ultra-nationalism to fan the flames of conflict throughout the various neighbouring countries. As the rise of nationalism grew, Slovenia followed by Croatia voted for independence and broke away from Yugoslavia by 1991.
On 29th February, and 1st March 1992 a referendum on independence was held in Bosnia. 99.7% of the those who voted declared “yes” and thus Independence was declared on 3rd March 1992. As Bosnian Serb political leadership boycotted the independence, the Serbian forces attacked Bosnia leading to four years of brutal ethnic cleansing, genocide, and crimes against humanity all up until 1995 when the Dayton Agreement was signed.
@@Evgenopolis Saddam Hussein was known for using terror against his own people. Saddam's regime brought about the deaths of at least 250,000 Iraqis and committed war crimes in Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. To maintain power he used fear, intimidation and torture like few other dictators in history. Convinced of his own invincibility, Saddam provoked an American invasion-and lost both his power and his life.
Excellent review and report!!
42:20 this video shows that people will assert any absurd propaganda if they are paid enough.
1/2 million ukraiinian older died, 5 time les dead in the ruin troops And now Ukrainian soldiers desert massively or surrender because they know as prisoners they ar well treated
The commanding of Ukrainian army is very weak probably they were trained by US special forces that trained the afghan army
Very insightful, great video.
See 2016 documentary film produced by Oliver Stone, "Ukraine On Fire" for an accurate in depth look at the history of Ukraine 🇺🇦.
This requires chapters, interesting video.
11:00 they are not new tanks. The are modernized soviet tanks
New tanks are being built from day 1 and still are! Russia has the factories for all aspects, U.S and NATO dont!!
What utter dribble! Russia's newest boat was sunk a few months ago. Forgotten?
@@boogiewoogie9770 Where?
@@m16-a2 Simply Google Russian newest ship destroyed or sunk.
Walk away from supporting an unjust war
Why do you have a background noise that reminds me of tinnitus? Couldn't bare it for more than 5 mins.
Russian trolls preventing us to hear this great report
bear
I agree, I cut the sound, left subtitles on
It’s Russians crying and moaning.
Big up z ❤
Love this guy, will want to see his opinion in just one year from the recording of this video.
Bet you won’t dare .
It's not even a year....😂
South Africa supports RUSSIA ❤
@@omphemetsechake2839 I am soooo surprised,,, good on you for noticing.
REALLY PROFESSIONAL SOLDIERS " RUSSIA "IN WHAT F~~~ING SENSE ??? I DON'T THINK THAT GUYS RIPPING OFF THE ARMY IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE COULD EVER BE CALLED PROFESSIONAL !!
IT MEANS THEY WERE TRAINED SOLDIERS WHO’S OCCUPATION WAS TO BE A SOLDIER AND NOT JUST MAN FROM THE DRFAT WHO SPENT FEW MONTHS IN THE ARMY. THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM ARE TOP NOTCH SOLDIER🙄
@@AS-010o0 WHAT HORSESHIT !
they have become professional embezzlers!!!!! lol DO YOU SEE?!?!?!
@@moejaime2654 actually your words are full scale horseshit , and AS-010o0 explained the matter wonderfully
@@Evgenopolis
He gave the basic description of a "soldier".
A professional soldier is a whole different thing and that's what the OP was saying.
Hooah?
Very honest opinion from the first guy...
Rusted and decayed Soviet era weponds how sad.
All these documentaries never fail to miss some positive stuff for Russia, they have recently made serious investments in gold rich African countries and have been steadily increasing gold reserves over the last 2 decades.
Are they planning to return it to Romania?
If Russia “wins” any objective, do sanctioning nations have to lift sanctions? Sanctions are a real demonstration of joint nations extreme opposition to and disagreement with Russia’s war. I think sanctions should continue indefinitely until Russia withdraws from Ukraine. If this threat was issued to Russia, for them to be a permanent pariah state, what do you think they would do? I’d like to ask this question to the experts in this video.
Russian loses are estimated at 400.000+ and not 120.000
If would know not so old history u would know that Russian mind set does allow heavy losses. Even IF its 400k they havs planty to send. And IF u look in not so old history u would know how western powers operate, meaning- they have so far fuckd over every partner in the end. That being sad-there can be no winners in this case.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
And how do you know this? lol
@@MrShuraj How do i know this in the era of information? Idk, youre a big boy, i feel like you can figure it out. But, after of a lot of thinking, you still cant come to a conclusion, feel free to come back and ask again.
Those are likely ukrainian
This is all a test just to see how far he can keep moving West...his " special operation"😡
Putin and Russia has made it very clear not to move West to Europe, but for Ukraine to remain neutral and act as a buffer between Russia and EU. Let's see how many more men Ukraine have to lose, meanwhile NATO has already been sending their soldiers to Ukraine to die in the Russian meatgrinder. I can say that EU is the stupidest region in this century. LOL
That's rubbish. Russia didn't want this war.
NATO has stopped moving east, that’s for sure
Putin is going nowhere.
One word : B.R.I.C.S.
Just stop the stupid insane war.
Not that simple
i just called putin, and he assured me,. it's just a military exercise,..
The combination of a failed war abroad and a brittle, strained system at home is increasing the likelihood of some sort of implosion inside Russia.
The Military Industrial Complex likes the cash. 😖
In the USA as well 😢
I commed this very informative video.
People say they are not getting the pay .
Неужели? Кто и где?
@@Иван_ИвановичHOLODOMOR. Red Terror. Polish Liquidation. Molotov-Ribbontrop.
@@Иван_ИвановичDig yu man... We know it. Same as for retirements.
Western propaganda
@@AbuBawa-sw1ut perhaps 🤔
What does the KING have to say about The Russian Problem???
Really good video. Thx for the infos.
Actually full of deliberate misinformation
Hahaha the BS you guys produce 😅
So you mean to tell me 1 million men couldn't remove 150,000 mean I didn't know these numbers.
We want Europe not Russia.
Russia is the largest country on the European continent.
@@Evgenopolis This Russia no longer has anything in common with Europe, it has chosen China.
Is it still "special military operation " ?
From the Polish perspective, the first target to hit, if Ukraine loses the war with Russia, might be a country in the northeast. While that is probable to a high extent, it might also be true that Russia could likely attack a particular country 🇷🇴 in its southwestern neighborhood because Moldova cannot stand in the way. Russia might find its natural borders in the southwest to be along the Carpathian mountains. There is not a whole lot of time left for the West to work harder in building its defense.
War mobilization and the expansion of law enforcement agencies, particularly the Federal Security Service, carries economic risks, as it obliges the government to continue to make expensive payments to these groups even when faced with budgetary challenges. These payments are an economic time bomb: high wages are extremely difficult to reduce, and doing so for the main pillar of Putin’s rule-the army and security forces-is not an option.
I would imagine the occupation of Moldova, Belarus, Azerbaijan and Georgia would proceed an attack on NATO.
Though if putin believes European and USA leaders are weak he may feel confident to try a quick grab for the Baltic states. Thoughbit would be a huge mistake destined to fail miserably.
What if Russia is satisfied with 25% of Ukraine they hold for a new buffer? The US Military Industrial Complex must be fed. 😢
@@MrJerry101 what if Ukraine is happy with 25% of russia. Surely you will be happy to make that sacrifice for peace.
Ofcourse you won't be happy.
Though the big point is that Putins fascist regime must be defeated in Ukraine if there is to be a lasting peace.
@@MrJerry101 Any attempt to bargain with Putin would set a disastrous precedent for the future of international relations.
Stop war and talk peace.
Innocent people are suffering because of the few greedy people who ❤ peace.
Greedy,corrupt who love themselves cause war
Многие тезисы опираются только на заявления российских официальных лиц - а они врут непрерывно. Например 500 000 контрактников - цифра не подтверждаемая никакими независимыми подсчетами, только заявлениями Путина и Медведева. так что выводы также сомнительны.
Назови другие официальные лица, других стран 0 про всех смогу сказать, что врут непрерывно.
Тебе ничего не остается как основываться на официальной документальной информации. Все остальное - возня в грязи домыслов.
@@skywillfindyou это что за манипуляция? об этом и речь что никакой документальной информации там нет и близко. только заявления.
Если собрать данные из разных источников , то так или иначе выходит, что армия РФ увиличилась более чем на 300 тысяч контрактников. Я имею в виду различные документы по обеспечения армии, по штатному составу, размеру фронта и масштабу боевых действий. Сколько точно действительно подтверить невозможно из независимых источников.
I bet you believe though that Ukraine has only lost 30K?
More like 600k. 😖
ok if russia can produce as many tank as 100 to 150 per mo, I must assume there is talk of T80 and T90, can I then get an explanation if russia has so much and can produce so much how can it be that we see russia using T62, T64, T55 and getting artelie from norkoria and drones from iran, it does not indicate they have richlit and are we talking about man losses can hardly be equal as ukrine does not use meat loss tactics
@@trogdortpennypacker6160 th-cam.com/video/-8ZPbnVqHrY/w-d-xo.html
@@trogdortpennypacker6160 Russia is not using meat waves, you are just brain washed by propaganda.
Russia cannot produce 150 T90 tanks per month, if that were the case you would see a lot more T90 tanks in Ukraine, the high number of Russian production comes from the reserves, which are mainly from the old stocks of the T50-T80 come. If the loss rate of Russian tanks does not decrease, sooner or later Russia will have a big problem.
@@trogdortpennypacker6160 As long as a Russian soldier is moving in a contested territory, commanders can report back to Moscow that they retain control. So they keep sending wave after wave of soldiers to die, in order to maintain their charade.
@@christianevanherck6023do you know how silly that sounds?
This is going to be a grind for Russia…. Remember Afghanistan, not too long after the USSR fell 🫡🇺🇸
Remember Vietnam, Afghanistan, Ukraine next.
great summary.
bot?
@@TheRealBillBobu clearly are
Amazing Work 🦾👏😁
We cannot let Russia win
The combination of a failed war abroad and a brittle, strained system at home is increasing the likelihood of some sort of implosion inside Russia.
That would cost many many more lives. Actually, from a humane point of view, it will be better if Russia wins. But this is not beneficial for the United States and NATO.
@@Evgenopolis Humane? One of the bitter ironies of the invasion is that the devastation inflicted by Putin’s troops has fallen disproportionately on the regions of Ukraine that Moscow claims to be protecting. The Russian army has reduced dozens of towns and cities throughout southern and eastern Ukraine to rubble and killed thousands of civilians. Millions more have been subjected to a brutal occupation regime marked by systematic torturing, executions, abductions, terror tactics, and forced deportations.
We are you Ukrainian? Get off the gas global policy of us has historicaly been a fiasco. Look what the cia did to iran in the 1950s we create problems not fix them
It already won.
See?
Excellent and indepth analyses. In a nutshell the present state of affairs is presented. Compliments.
Putin is so grateful that he sent Trump a jar of hummus for Easter:
it's made of Russian chick pea.
Stalin sent a birthday cake to Lenin's widow Krupskaya. A day later she was dead.
Putin wants Biden to win. lol
What the hell is your point with this boring joke?
@@coshyno I/DD?
@@coshyno Useful idiot? Hilarious Freudian Slip.
Cynical and biased coverage.
In 43:45 He said rainy day.What that means. Or maybe he's thinking of detonating a nuclear bomb in the air in a certain place so that the radiarsion in that spot is raining straight down?
Oil program...If they say to Ukraine Allies. We will give our excess oil 50% cheaper to you. So what happens.
I guess you don't hava a clue what "for a rainy day" idiom means.
Putin is basically saying that he wants to spare those warheads until a time comes when he needs them. In english "for a rainy day" or "to save something for a rainy day" means that someone doesnt intend on using something right now, but instead wants to keep it until a time comes when it is desperately needed.
For more stable nation it needs a singular leader surrounded with brillant, talented and more importantly solid patriotic public servant. Rival party or parties always has an opposing agendas that can be easily manipulated by enemies where they can capitalize on the situation to destroy and sabotage.
You say Russia took a beating and showes Ukrainian warprisoners.
Starting off with asking the question “Is russias military strong enough to defeat Ukraine on the battlefield” automatically assumes I follow western propaganda efforts.
The only part I disliked was the sound effect made when you flash text to the screen. It sounds like a dog bark outside, and I had to get up and look out all of the windows before deciding it was the tv. Im not sure why you'd think an effect was needed, but if you must include it, make it a recognizable common effect so we know what it is. But its a great video.
Hey man, do you smoke a lot of meth?
It's wrong to include military assets into any economic statistics. Those don't get you anything except more stuff to shoot. At the very least, I think it's definitely not something you normally profit from monetarily.
Describing the US. 900 billion - 75 % is waste and graft
Russia cannot give up Putin to hell with Putin
I enjoy watching / listening to your videos. I commute a couple of hours a day and will set up a playlist in the morning and listen to it throughout the day. When you have a foreign language speaker and just put subtitles under it, that part of the video is useless to me. I skip it. Sometimes I have time to catch it later in the evenings, but more generally, I just don't get to watch / listen to it. Dubbed over speech is a much better solution. Providing the actual foreign language does not make it more authentic. I have to trust your written translations. Please help.
Stop the Trump-Putin ticket: do not vote GOP - vote for democracy or loose it!!!!
Not only propaganda, but a very poor attempt at it
The average life expectancy for a Russian male is about 58. This along with people that left, and terrible demographics should be factored in when it comes to Russia being willing to speed up their demise. Russia's existential threat is their demographics, not Ukraine or even NATO, of course unless they try to invade NATO
I have a very close friend in central Russia, she once told me that "Everything in Russia is sh*t, EXCEPT the piss..". This was a couple of years before Russia invaded Crimea. Having lived in Russia I can vouch for her words... (I communicate with her several times each week and I'm informed that things are becoming more and more difficult in everyday life.).
I like to know the names and professions of the people speaking so I can check their bona fides. Without that information it's just random people saying anything. Most documentaries put the speaker's title on screen as they speak.
That is why I down voted this video and will not watch this channel again.
It doesn’t even matter
No matter who they they can’t be taken serious
Wassup!!!!
58:53 "You can fool some of the people all of the time, these are the ones to concentrate on."..... George Bush 2001 and that's what this video is all about.
All world vs against russia amd still russia alive think about it
Great documentary no one can predict the future but for me, it's hard to imagine any executive from a Western company having the courage to propose to it's board of directors to make a sizable investment in Russia plus it seems that Russia's credit rating is pretty much done for the foreseeable future.
Russia’s inflation rate has already surpassed 7 percent, forcing the Bank of Russia to maintain interest rates at 16 percent. Despite these high interest rates, businesses and households continue to borrow, indicating high inflation expectations. This means that the key rate will not return to single digits any time soon.
@@christianevanherck6023 have you checked the inflation in the US? The number is nothing less than 14% if its not manipulated by the Biden administration.
Russia doesn't need Western credit. Russia has Oil/natural gas, BRICS or strong military allies with China. The sanctions made them stringer. Now in a war economy they are becoming more and more scary, while the US is focused on LGBT+ Rights and spending money it does not have. Breaks my heart.
It's all about political types in the US making money for the Military Industrial Complex. 😖
@@MrJerry101 At the end of 2024, a 5 year agreement expires governing one of the oldest and biggest economic links between Russia and Europe: the transit of Russian gas through the territory of Ukraine. Kyiv has already said it will not extend the agreement. Russia would take a financial hit if it could no longer transport its gas via Ukraine. There are no equivalent alternative markets for the Yamal gas currently sold to Europe, and that will not change significantly, even with the construction of the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline to China (no earlier than 2030) and an LNG plant on the Baltic Sea (currently planned for 2026-2027). The combined capacity of those two new projects is approximately half of the volume by which supplies to Europe have already decreased.
The bloke speaking for a time around 45minutes needs to remove UHHHHHH from his vocabulary
The Naziregime also believed in the "End Sieg" even in the ruins of the German cities.
Ukraine has the NAZIS
If an American president performed as good as Putin, I would also vote for him for life.
Russia went from utterly poor to a world economic power that seemingly gets respect from all nations today-
Could not say that prior to Putin!
Hes PUTIN' it to em!
In the same way that Russia had to retreat from Afghanistan for her loses 14,000 men and a plane shot down with stinger missiles A DAY and numerous loses in tanks and artillery, it will also retreat from Ukraine. Putin will face the same end than Hitler, way too many enemies, too many armies against him, too many miles on the front line. Europe along with all the armies combined and a 17 trillion dollar economy plus the help of the USA will erode the Russian economy (Only slightly bigger than Italy) day by day, little by little until start reaching the standards of living of her citizens and specially the interests of Russian powerful companies. Neither Europe or the United States can tolerate that the natural resources of Siberia fall in the hands of China.
Only problem is this narrative which was continuously vomited on a daily basis is untrue. As long as Russia prolongs the war, it will be tougher for the EU and US to support Ukraine. The US citizens are already against sending more money to Ukraine, meanwhile EU, being the cowards they are couldn't even last 1 wave against Russia let alone invading the motherland. Russia is doing better than EU countries in 2023. The only thing we see clearly is that EU and US do not conform to any international law by illegally sanctioning Russia and confiscating their reserves in EU. Say whatever you want, that is illegal. It sets a precedent whereby whoever pisses US/EU off, will get their money frozen/confiscated..maybe not today, but in the near future.
Does this sound like western propaganda to anyone else ?
As I've read elsewhere some time ago, a nation with a chicken on its coat of arms should never invade a nation with a fork on theirs.
That’s funny
Others... Same spirit have this word on flag "Qui s'y frotte s'y pique".... French old word directly picked up in english.
The US was supposed to have a turkey.
Mutant chicken
a mutant chicken
Russia being rattled by this war so immersed in this conflict with societal implications across the board.