Fantastic interview, Andi. I've now subscribed to Strategy Sessions podcast on Apple as well. Having Seth at the Belfast Marketing Meet Up was a dream come true for everyone in the audience.
Nuclear energy is the answer, but never addressed. Hybrid is key. Carbon taxes don't help climate, it is a redistribution and money grab by the elite and politicians, and the political system is horrible. The people can do more. The political elite are terrible at marketing thank God.
I’d suggest nuclear is part if the discussion rather than the answer. France is big on nuclear, Japan was but less so after Fukushima. It’s also an old technology and there may be better answers coming on tap now. I’d also disagree on taxes. The whole tax structure is built around driving behaviour. We tax things we see as socially unacceptable - alcohol and tobacco - to drive behaviour change. I don’t see why excessive carbon use shouldn’t be subject to the same standard
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
Fantastic interview, Andi. I've now subscribed to Strategy Sessions podcast on Apple as well. Having Seth at the Belfast Marketing Meet Up was a dream come true for everyone in the audience.
It was such a great event and Seth’s surprise appearance was the icing on the cake. Great fun.
such awesome content, love seeing your growth
Thank you!
Awesome
Hey! Thank you. I appreciate you 🙌🏾
Nuclear energy is the answer, but never addressed. Hybrid is key. Carbon taxes don't help climate, it is a redistribution and money grab by the elite and politicians, and the political system is horrible. The people can do more. The political elite are terrible at marketing thank God.
I’d suggest nuclear is part if the discussion rather than the answer.
France is big on nuclear, Japan was but less so after Fukushima. It’s also an old technology and there may be better answers coming on tap now.
I’d also disagree on taxes. The whole tax structure is built around driving behaviour. We tax things we see as socially unacceptable - alcohol and tobacco - to drive behaviour change. I don’t see why excessive carbon use shouldn’t be subject to the same standard