10 Reasons REAPER is better than PRO TOOLS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ค. 2024
  • Ultimate Reaper Guide:- promixacademy.com/course/the-...
    Get yourself an interface to use Reaper with here:- hoppole.co/id4
    NOTE:- This video is NOT "Reaper is better than ProTools PERIOD" or anything even like that. It's fun, light hearted and any comments that disagree are completely fine - as long as they're not just pure vitriolic hatred. Those comments will be removed.
    What gear to buy? We recommend interfaces, microphones, monitors and more at our Thomas (Europe) and Sweetwater (USA) links below
    www.thomann.de/gb/thlpg_loh2r...
    🍻 BUY US A BEER WITH PATREON!🍻
    / hoppolestudios
    Thanks to our Patrons who made this possible - your names are at the end of the video. You make a huge difference!
    📱 FOLLOW US HERE 📱
    Facebook: / adamsteelproducer
    Instagram: / adamsteelproducer
    All links are affiliate links
    #ReaperDAW #ReaperVSProTools #ProTools
    0:00 - Intro
    1:47 - Reaper is Cheaper
    3:14 - Reaper is Super Stable
    4:25 - Reaper runs on Anything
    6:20 - Reaper can change its appearance
    7:55 - Reaper Supports ARA
    10:10 - Reaper has a huge community
    11:50 - Reaper has Regular Updates
    12:45 - Reaper gets new features often
    15:00 - Spectral Peaks
    17:00 - Automatic File Naminga

ความคิดเห็น • 534

  • @adamsteelproducer
    @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Is REAPER your main DAW? If so, let us know in the comments what makes it great for you! Also check out our HUGE 50,000 Subscriber GIVEAWAY Happening NOW!!! giv.gg/hoppole50k

    • @michaelgraziotto7038
      @michaelgraziotto7038 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Been playing music fornalmost 30 years but new to engineering and mixing. You were actually the reason I went with reaper about 2 years ago and I love it!

    • @Gearjunkie35
      @Gearjunkie35 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Recently switched. For my use as easy to use as audacity. As easy or complex as needed. Thanks as always for the great content. Cheers from Wisconsin

    • @genuinefreewilly5706
      @genuinefreewilly5706 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gearjunkie35 Glad to know there are other audacity users.
      Ive used it for lots of foley art and effects
      It was never designed for the likes of midi piano rolls, and full on logic music scores
      Id say for recording on the fly its great. As many channels as you need, and takes, editing, the silence feature, etc its brilliant
      Folks in the field in the wild, recording scientists, not so much musicians love audacity, humans far brighter than myself. If I were of another discipline I would use Audacity, it works well, easy to use and always expandable. I was blown away with ancient limited Sound Forge, just 2 channels in the day. Heck I think its still around like Audacity
      In some respects I think I made better one shot recordings using audacity and Sound Forge

    • @christophervaca7116
      @christophervaca7116 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess this is part 1😉

    • @voiceovervandeen
      @voiceovervandeen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep main DAW since I went full time in VO, being mainly a Linux user it's a no brainer for me. Love the flexability, + Carla brings win/mac plugins into play as well. I still use Audacity as a 2nd editor for bare waveform tweaks of individual samples though.

  • @cederickforsberg5840
    @cederickforsberg5840 2 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    That ancient leftover code in Pro Tools gives the sound a more vintage vibe

    • @martellackerman3434
      @martellackerman3434 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Underrated comment!

    • @DarkArachnid666
      @DarkArachnid666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's a good one. :)

    • @matthewbryant2972
      @matthewbryant2972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Or you just want to add movie audio production into your hobby or business... there's so much more work with omf files than there is recording bands in 2021...
      The reaper hype is pretty unprofessional, to me, because there's an entire world of computer audio gigs you're actually locked out of, because no filmmaker can send you an omf

    • @jpruhu7662
      @jpruhu7662 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol. For the win!

    • @billB101
      @billB101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @SunTai Why do people use it? Probably because PT can handle recording any size of session with low latency at the highest sample rates. I mean, you 're not going to see Reaper in many full orchestra sessions, large scale gig recordings or on a Hollywood sized film mixing stage mixing in say, Dolby Atmos that's for sure. There's a reason why you see PT in these environments, cos it's second to non working on that level.
      FYI I use Reaper and I use PT ( also Logic and Ableton ) horses for course and all that really.

  • @TechBlokeUK
    @TechBlokeUK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    The fact that you will never have to deal with Avid 'Support' is reason enough in itself.

    • @deadshot4245
      @deadshot4245 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Dogshit company with terrible business models and practices in comparison to anyone else. There’s about 5 to 10 daws that blow it out of the water on usability and pricing

    • @kristianalexanderpedersen7382
      @kristianalexanderpedersen7382 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are evil and dumb - I'M OUT. Had Pro Tools crash on me and won't open a session I have been working on for a year no matter what I do, and they want me to pay 60 USD for support. 10+ Year user here - I'M out. downloading reaper now - Freedom awaits !

    • @PracticaProphetica
      @PracticaProphetica 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Ah, Avid, the company that wrecked Sibelius...

  • @alteredanimesh
    @alteredanimesh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    And another feature I like in REAPER is that we can open multiple projects and can copy things from one project to another. This is really really helpful thing.

    • @isaacmaestrecampo9294
      @isaacmaestrecampo9294 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Indeed

    • @isaiahhudson5470
      @isaiahhudson5470 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Holy Moly so this shit pretty much open source….🤣

    • @LCRLive687
      @LCRLive687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why the hell would a person want to have two sessions open? LOL

    • @symphomaniac
      @symphomaniac 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@LCRLive687 the OP already explained why

  • @conororegan7341
    @conororegan7341 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    One click to make a track a folder on Reaper - instead of having to route via busses. Really helpful.

    • @FatNorthernBigot
      @FatNorthernBigot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yeah! The folder system on Reaper is inspired. Why aren't all DAWs like that?

    • @kevinlong4657
      @kevinlong4657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      nested folder tracks too. folders are SO legit in reaper.

    • @BrofUJu
      @BrofUJu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You can also literally just click and drag to another track! Super helpful with reverb sends, sidechaining, that kind of stuff.

    • @RolandDeschain1
      @RolandDeschain1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Whenever I watch a video of anyone using ProTools and they start futzing with busses in that massive drop-down menu I just go cross-eyed.

    • @piscesman54
      @piscesman54 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, this was a game changer for me. It really simplifies the workflow and makes it easy to understand what's going on at a single glance. I don't whether there is any other DAW that does that.

  • @FatNorthernBigot
    @FatNorthernBigot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    As someone who's used DAWs since the mid 90's (Cubase, Cakewalk, and now Reaper), and four track tape recorders before that (Fostex, Tascam), I'm absolutely astounded at what we can get for sixty dollars.
    My old copy of Cubase used to fall on it's arse every half-an-hour. Every time I did anything I pressed Ctrl-S.

    • @ilikemyrealname
      @ilikemyrealname 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      PT user for over 15 years. I don’t trust that pos DAW for a second so I save all the time too. I’ve worn the S key out of multiple keyboards over the years.

    • @h1k053
      @h1k053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Whereas you can set REAPER to make a backup of your project automatically as frequently as you want, even every single minute :)

    • @ilikemyrealname
      @ilikemyrealname 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@h1k053 You can set frequent backups in PT as well. Still, a lot of artistic decisions can be made in a minute, and I don’t want to lose a single one of them. (Especially when I’m on the clock)

    • @BrunoNeureiter
      @BrunoNeureiter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I still do this in reaper

  • @lexluthier8290
    @lexluthier8290 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Reaper: The best hotel in the world, where you can order pretty much anything you want and get it. Now.
    Tariff: 60 bucks for many years ( I paid mine about 4 years ago - still going on the same licence).
    ProTools: A bucket of cold sick.
    Tariff: How much have you got? Give us more.
    Not that I'm biased or anything 😁

  • @NomaiMusic
    @NomaiMusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    I'm a simple man - I see "REAPER better than PRO TOOLS", I hit like.

    • @johnwalter6410
      @johnwalter6410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The "I'm a simple man" comment is getting old 😉

    • @NomaiMusic
      @NomaiMusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@johnwalter6410 so is Pro Tools

    • @GUPRPEET-Singh
      @GUPRPEET-Singh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@johnwalter6410 😂👍true..

    • @johnwalter6410
      @johnwalter6410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@NomaiMusic I agree,, Pro tools STILL doesnt even have an insert plugin with automatic delay comp. Literally every other DAW does.

    • @danielmconnolly7
      @danielmconnolly7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnwalter6410
      It served it's purpose but ProTools is heading for retirement.

  • @anshuljain8515
    @anshuljain8515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    With SWS extensions, having a set of rules set for track coloring is such a huge time saver. The moment I name the track 'bass', it will turn pink.
    Reaper's recent update let's you see the peak RMS and LUFS values while rendering. SWS extensions make gain staging to particular LUFS values possible.
    What's not to like

    • @Bluelagoonstudios
      @Bluelagoonstudios 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Darn right, Importing tracks, mostly 70 and more, and your tracks appearing in the right color, a big time saver, maybe a few you have to do manually. But these are peanuts. SWS is a musthave in Reaper, my opinion.

  • @DavidSJ_DAP
    @DavidSJ_DAP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Rapid Environment for Audio Production, Editing, and Recording...
    It's massive amount of available customization is it's greatest strength and it's biggest weakness...

  • @Angelo-vb6dg
    @Angelo-vb6dg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I avoided Reaper for a long time as I had the perception it wasn't "pro" software, I ended up using even Reason. Finally tested it a year and a half ago and I was totally blown away by how good it is. The other issue is a lot of DAWs are freaking expensive, barely do significant updates and charge a lot for "newer versions with newer features". Reaper is a no brainer.

  • @alessandrocernuzzi
    @alessandrocernuzzi ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Since Pro Tools 9 sadly and annoyingly stopped working on Windows 10, I did give Reaper a try. I'm blown away already, after 15 minutes of playing around with it. Everything is so natural and straight forward! I was worried to change DAW and having to learn everything all over again, but your knowledge is not lost just by switching to another DAW. I'll definitely make the purchase soon and kindly say goodbye to Pro Tools 🖤

    • @jakobole
      @jakobole ปีที่แล้ว

      There are scripts that will make it behave like pro tools vis a vis shortcut keys :)

  • @hojaboom6799
    @hojaboom6799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What I liked best about Reaper, when looking into getting a DAW, They were the only one to give me ALL the bells and whistles to try.
    Needless to say, I bought a license and haven't looked back. Shout out to Hop Pole and Adam, Thanks for the Tutorials, I'm learning a lot. I also purchased Ozone9 from iZotope. Thank you.

  • @mageprometheus
    @mageprometheus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Number 0 - Reaper is extensible with scripting and C++ with an expansive API.

  • @robertoriccitelli2452
    @robertoriccitelli2452 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Another thing I love about Reaper, is that if you import a project from another user, recorded at a different sample rate (i.e. 48KHz instead of 44.1KHz), it automatically resample the tracks in no time. Try to do that with Pro Tools....that's right, you can't🤭...it tells you that "some tracks are recorded at a different sample rate and they will sound slower or faster"🙈

    • @timinglismusic6707
      @timinglismusic6707 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Had this exact issue in the studio a few weeks ago. We were told the sample rate was 48K but it was actually 44.1K (should have checked it, rookie mistake, but then, I'm a rookie so, meh) so we couldn't time align anything to the tempo for the whole song. Once we fixed the sample rate, nothing needed to be aligned because it all slotted in. Reaper would have just cleared it throat and got on with the show.

    • @haliaeetus8221
      @haliaeetus8221 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, that can be a biggie!

  • @rayderrich
    @rayderrich 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I started with Opcode Vision for MIDI decades ago and got me BIAS Deck for multitrack audio (meaning about 4 tracks before my computer ran too hot). It is awesome to have lived through so much and see what Reaper can do for that price. Thanks for your video.

  • @superconnie5003
    @superconnie5003 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello thanks for this vid really helps. Got a question really appreciate if you can help with.My Reapers is connected to a Allen & Heath Q 16.If I press 'Mute' on any channel will reaper still record?.Or will that particular channel be muted?.

  • @Krantykeys
    @Krantykeys 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir I'm in need of some help i am a keyboardist and i have been using reaper for 3 years and this is my 1st daw and i love it a lot but i got my self a micro korg recently and it works perfectly except native instrument kontact. But that plugging works perfectly with my yamaha psr keyboard. I have tried to use this same keyboard and same vst in other daws it works but not in reaper and also i tried a m audio keystation 61 too. But it Doesn't work with native instrument at all only psr works with it
    Please help i love reaper and i don't wanna switch

  • @bayphoenix
    @bayphoenix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Wow.
    Im a huge PT fan but the last two are HUGE incentives for me to learn reaper.

  • @rl2905
    @rl2905 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One of my favorite features in Reaper is with the extension pack. I like to color my tracks, and with a particular extension (can't remember the name of it exactly) you can tell reaper to search for keywords in your track titles and assign those keywords to a color. For example, I have guitars set to blue and keyboards/Piano set to green. So when I go through and title my tracks Lead Guitar or Rhythm Guitar, it will see the word "guitar" in my track title and automatically color the track blue. Same with piano/keyboard. You can set as many as you want. It's a small thing, but man it saves me such an annoying amount of time going through those dropdowns and assigning custom colors.
    Oh another thing I LOVE about Reaper - The routing matrix.....wow.

  • @EthanNewsom
    @EthanNewsom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I was trained on ProTools. I didn't like it even then, but I had to use it. I eventually found myself liking Logic a lot more because it's got a better UI and it really matches my quick workflow and I've been kind of afraid of switching to something else because it has to have the same kind of feel that Logic has had for me for the past 6 years I've been doing this. But I'm starting to like Reaper more and more despite never having used it once and I think you've convinced me to give it a shot.

    • @robertw1871
      @robertw1871 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty sure you can use PT shortcuts in Reaper if you set it up… the switch should be easy

    • @igc_online
      @igc_online 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      i have a Logic X theme on my Reaper and because its so fast, i'm super happy

  • @songmore
    @songmore 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Multi-track editing (especially for drums) in Pro Tools is the one thing that keeps me coming back. No other DAW that I have used makes sense to me the way Pro Tools does for this purpose.

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Ok- but that’s just something you’re used to- I’m probably just as comfortable with drum editing in reaper. It’s a good point but not one that actually makes pro tools better imo

    • @BrofUJu
      @BrofUJu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Hmm? You can easily do this in Reaper. You click G and group them together and then you can drag and edit stuff as a group, it's super simple.

    • @joemarta8221
      @joemarta8221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Use the group feature in reaper for equivalent functionality

    • @justin.johnson
      @justin.johnson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Multi track editing is the most basic function of EVERY daw

  • @Bluelagoonstudios
    @Bluelagoonstudios 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I came from ProTools 9HD right to Reaper, after 6 months learning I'm pretty a advanced user, thanks to your video's, the community, Kenny's tutorials, Justin for scripting ideas and much more. Last week 3 updates in a week, I just had to build a new system, because this old Mac is too little to run big projects. That's why I'm not yet member of the pro academy. Btw I have a question for other DAW users, are curved monitors a problem for audio production? I see only flat ones out there. @Wally same here, disabled, but very into mixing. Take care

  • @edumas8706
    @edumas8706 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Adam, do you provide the instruments tracks you wirk on in the promix course?

  • @rickhammel9541
    @rickhammel9541 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dumb question, I just started using Garage Band, and I play guitar. I like the built in drummers, and jam along to all the loops built in there. Does Reaper have anything like that to use? Thanks in advance!

  • @djmouglie
    @djmouglie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My favourite feature is that you can have multiple takes on one track and play them all back at the same time overlapping. This makes a vocal dub easy without having to make a new track. Or you want to have two sound effects on one track but they overlap. In reaper that's no problem, you don't need to make two tracks and then rooute them or group them to add an effect to both. Later I might tidy things up with double takes on one track but when you are in the middle of being creative just being able to record on top of other takes and dragging samples and files in anywhere regardless if other stuff is playing there already is amazing.

  • @PianoManPaul
    @PianoManPaul 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have viewed a few of your vids, and first let me say THANK YOU for all I've so far picked up from them. I love Reaper for many reasons, I WANT it to become my go-to and main DAW, but I find in most projects, connections that are simple to set up in other DAWs, become frustrating in Reaper. I'm getting better, and hope to 'master' this like you obviously have, but I'm in the beginnings of what has now become a time-sensitive original project slated for release next year, all of which I'm recording myself, so it's gotta be about the music NUMBER ONE. Learning, videos, researching, applying, repeating - that now has to come SECOND at least for the time being. And just today, wooaaahh that MIDI editor - don't get me started on that.
    (10:15 pm, same day edit): Example- I own Arturia's wonderful Vocoder 5 - I got it working effortlessly in Cubase... Studio One managed to stump me a LITTLE longer on it's setup, then 2 hours ago, I thought I'd give it a go in Reaper. I went through Reaper help tips and documentation/videos. I followed Arturia's own Reaper setup guide that's included RIGHT IN THE PLUGIN (because they're aware of the rocket science degree many need to perform complex routing operations in Reaper) ..... and, the reason for this edit, is to let you know: I'm STILL TRYING. :( I'm about to give up for tonight before something expensive gets broken...
    Don't get me wrong. I LOVE Reaper, like I said I WANT it to be my go-to... So please: KEEP POSTING these great videos! Need all the help I can get! =)

  • @johnfeole1971
    @johnfeole1971 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Adam, I was just researching DAWs and came across this info(as Reaper looked promising), and you helped me decide to try it..will look up any instructional vids you may have posted 😎

  • @DopamineOverload
    @DopamineOverload 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Do another one of these videos-- including how easy it is to timestretch audio, midi... dynamic split... there are SO many things to mention. VST, VST3, DX support. For Mac-- Mac VST and AU. No proprietary AAX (formerly RTAS???) b.s. The list goes on and on and on and on.

  • @CrushingAxes
    @CrushingAxes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Man everything about Reaper is great! The only reason to still have pro tools is because sometimes you have to get some sessions from other studios, but I only use Reaper here!

    • @andthoseotherguys
      @andthoseotherguys 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can you tell me how to remove hiss? I've always used Cool Edit and its pretty straight forward on that platform... I spent a few hours on Reaper and never found an option. I'm just a guitarist who writes lyrics and pretends to sing them after playing drums...not a tech guy.

    • @CrushingAxes
      @CrushingAxes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andthoseotherguys Hey there, I check some songs on your channel really liked the riffs on "Being Human Makes me Sick", did you try the JS: De-esser, also did you use a pop filter?

    • @andthoseotherguys
      @andthoseotherguys 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CrushingAxes I just recorded drums with my phone, replayed thru a 2 inch bluetooth speaker and recorded that and guitar on another phone. Lol. Going back to my roots inspired me to buy a Tascam 03SD. My new project sounds much better. I'm just having a hard time with Reaper and my revisit Cool Edit Pro.

    • @AndyCampbellMusic
      @AndyCampbellMusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andthoseotherguys
      th-cam.com/video/HEY9XIYJtGg/w-d-xo.html Look for Kenny Gioa instructional videos on the Reaper home page. He covers pretty much everything.

  • @tonynicosiamusic7237
    @tonynicosiamusic7237 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am a new subscriber and a recent new user on Reaper.You are with Reaper Mania, The Reaper Blog, you are actually the reason I went with Reaper, I am very happy a big thank you.Tony from Paris [France]

  • @mcfarlanehero2123
    @mcfarlanehero2123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you do a video on how to hook up the Audient id4 audio interface and Akai MIDI MPK keyboard to reaper? I can’t get both to work at the same time. They don’t communicate with each other.

  • @mr.e8432
    @mr.e8432 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I’m switching to Reaper mainly for the first two reasons you mentioned. It’s so much cheaper, and maybe it’s just being a windows user, but the hours I’ve wasted because Protools crashed….I can’t even count. Glitches on startup, not finding an ilok license for a plug-in, after literally every update it’s guaranteed I’ll be searching for hours on forums for a solution to some new startup error code…. I can’t count the number of times I’ve just wanted to start it up for a minute to record a quick idea and it turns into hours of troubleshooting some new stupid problem. I’m done. Your tutorials have been a huge help in getting me up and running, much appreciated! My next project is to phase out any plug-ins I have that require an Ilok or that stupid pace licensing system.👍🏼 (which kind of sucks because I really like a lot of the Slate plug-ins, but they’re going next)

    • @piscesman54
      @piscesman54 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, definitely screw Ilock. It's just a way of having you by the balls. No matter how good the plugin is, surely there is something equally effective that doesn't require that kind of commitment, perhaps even free.

  • @ThePeterwonder
    @ThePeterwonder 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am really contemplating moveing to reaper, I use pro tools for streaming and I put a little doubler and waves tune real time on my vocals will this still be possible on reaper thanks for you vids on you tube

  • @voiceovervandeen
    @voiceovervandeen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yep main DAW since I went full time in VO, being mainly a Linux user it's a no brainer for me. Love the flexability, + Carla brings win/mac plugins into play as well. I still use Audacity as a 2nd editor for bare waveform tweaks of individual samples though.

  • @timinglismusic6707
    @timinglismusic6707 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the video @adamsteelproducer As a current Pro Tools user, I was fortunate enough to have my subscription drop from around $145-$150AUD/m for Pro Tools Ultimate to about $45-$50AUD/m for Studio. That felt like Christmas! Then one of my lecturers says, "Yeah but, Reaper is only $60 once off. $225 if you get the pro licence." That's about $95AUD for the personal licence and $350AUD for the commercial licence! That's a no-brainer... I've been using Reaper for about a week now and I already love the fact that you can open multiple sessions, make portable installs, use different themes (I found and LOVE the Imperial theme because I'm used to using big consoles, so I feel at home with this theme), set different dockers for different stages of production, such as editing, mixing, tracking, and so forth. I'm proficient in Pro Tools, it's the main DAW in my course at JMC Academy, but Reaper will be my main DAW moving forward because I can take it with me and run it on the system in the studio I'm working in.

  • @RasShango
    @RasShango 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How can I bypass the first slot plugins on multiple tracks simultaneously in Reaper? Specifically, I am working with ten tracks, and each one has a unique saturation plugin in the first slot. I need to bypass all these first-slot plugins in one action, regardless of their brand or type. Furthermore, it's crucial that this action only affects the first slot plugins, even if the same plugin type appears in a different slot in the FX chain on these tracks. Is there a method in Reaper to selectively bypass only the first slot plugins across multiple tracks without affecting other instances of the same plugins in different slots?

  • @gabrieltauk
    @gabrieltauk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    11. Reaper edits video
    12. Render queue
    13. Instalation files have only 13mb
    14. The community develops enhances, extensions and tools
    ...and more!

  • @Light31977
    @Light31977 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you recommend minimum system requirements in a PC laptop compatibility with Reaper? Shopping on a budget. Does it have to be 16gb of ram or will it work great with 8? Also, if you can suggest other minimum specs as well. Thank you so much!

    • @ivanadaev1000
      @ivanadaev1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I guess it heavily depends on what are you planning to do with Reaper, and not on the Reaper itself. I use it for composing with Xpand!2 (great orchestral synth, BTW, especially for a beginner like me), and it works perfectly on my laptop with 4gb ram and 2-core AMD A6. My project has somewhere around 20 Xpand midi tracks, no glitches so far.
      From my experience, one thing I would pay attention to is screen size and resolution, because the more useful screen area you get, the more comfortable it will be to work, and this is important for any DAW, not just Reaper. I would definitely not recommend resolution lower than Full HD (1920 x 1080), even though technically you can work on lower resolutions.

  • @justinturner653
    @justinturner653 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As someone who used to DJ & use that feature in Traktor for EQing tracks live, Spectral mixing looks awesome!!

  • @kelvinfunkner
    @kelvinfunkner ปีที่แล้ว +2

    been a long time PT user (20yrs) and now looking at switching to Reaper and also from a Mac to Windows...looks like the future for me is gonna be brighter than I thought :-) thanks!

  • @FloorStylez
    @FloorStylez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Am a huge fl studio, reason, logic user. Reaper is slowly taking over for every task. I am currently reconfiguring the midi editor in reaper to mirror the FL studio commands. Going pretty well and the midi creating is super speedy now hahaha. No limits on this thanks to the genius Justin Frankel

  • @AironExTv
    @AironExTv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Similar reasons for me. I've used DAWs for almost 30 years, and Reaper travels fairly quickly, is lean, configurable, in addition to all the great reasons you've provided. You can take it with you. That's another thing Protools will not do. It also costs a fraction to setup a small mixing room that holds up well with a Command/Control and M5/6 controller units. Never mind that we can use EuCon hardware with Reaper anyway.
    I still find Protools to be a fine tracking rig with HDX hardware, essentially a digital mixer with a DAW frontend. You can get something similar with UAD hardware and to a lesser degree other hardware interfaces that have on-board DSP. Then again, a $1600 X32 console as a frontend will do that as well.
    Protools is stuggling to catch up with a few interesting feature additions, like swapping out DSP and native versions of plugins, but that kind of stuff should have been a thing when AAX first showed up. If I'm using Protools and have a significant investment in it, I'll use until it is absolutely no longer viable, or Avid drops the support football entirely. That's unlikely to happen, so it'll keep existing like all the others. Mostly without me using it for anything but session checking and importing, though I have a conversion program for that as well. :)
    Btw, the Reaper session file is TEXT. You can edit it in a text editor, support it with any tool because it's plain as day what everything in the session file does. Protools hides its session contents from its own users by encrypting them. Another brownie point lost.

  • @ThroughFallenEyes
    @ThroughFallenEyes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    32 Bit plugin support. Yes, I know there's ways around it. But they JUST WORK. No messing about.

  • @nikoru2821
    @nikoru2821 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For a person that wants to focus heavily on sound design and Foley for everything in general. is Reaper recommended?
    Thanks in advance!

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely! Reaper is a vehicle for whatever you want to do, and I’ve done plenty of film and SD work in it

    • @nikoru2821
      @nikoru2821 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamsteelproducer many thanks Hop!

    • @andreasfranzmann9634
      @andreasfranzmann9634 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes check out IDDQD Sound here on TH-cam, he has some great tutorials and wokflows around sound design and foley.
      And also check out Hop Pole Studios of course. :-)

    • @nikoru2821
      @nikoru2821 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andreasfranzmann9634 Thanks so much. Just went to his channel and subscribed!

  • @rodrigolaporte274
    @rodrigolaporte274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Excellent! I'm going to switch from Logic to some-other-daw and so far reaper is #1 on my list, and this video had a lot of very interesting info. Thanks!!!

    • @Melvin7727
      @Melvin7727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It has barely scratched the surface. You will love Reaper and it will grow on you in every measurable way for a DAW. My experience anyway

  • @badhairdave9126
    @badhairdave9126 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone help? No output signal thru my mac outputs. Signal on the
    VU's for tracks and master going strong. Have looked everywhere on net
    and tried everything on mac and reaper settings. Reaper forum isn't
    working for me, joined but I can't post, comment, reply, etc!), Reaper
    support isn't answering, and my free trial is about to end. Anyone?

  • @ettiennelane9173
    @ettiennelane9173 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you buy Reaper 6 you get all the updates through 7 and only need to buy Reaper 8 again. I bought Reaper at version 5 (5 or 6 years ago) and will only need to pay again at version 7. Value for money much?

  • @Brian-Cherry
    @Brian-Cherry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I may be wrong but I’m fairly sure my previous version covered two complete Reaper versions i.e. 4 and 5.

  • @tuckerdawson
    @tuckerdawson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Hop Pole Studios could you do a quick tutorial talking about wildcards? I didn’t know that was what that feature could be used for.

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’ve got one out there in our tutorial series

    • @tuckerdawson
      @tuckerdawson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adamsteelproducer OK. I’ll have to look for it. I’ve always wanted to be able to do all my mastering for the songs on one session and then split it up on one track. That way I can do any master fader adjustments and anything else that I might need to do in the one session for the master

  • @Bloody_Marie
    @Bloody_Marie 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hy, where can I find the link to the discord?

  • @atlantaguitar9689
    @atlantaguitar9689 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Years ago I moved from Pro Tools over to Logic and never looked back. However, I've recently been learning Reaper incrementally and have been pleased thus far but haven't had time to make the jump in a big way. I've got a new project coming up that I will initiate in Reaper and I'm trusting that I'll get it all sorted without too much trouble. I don't really push the envelope in my productions so I'm betting it will be pretty easy to complete the work.

  • @TimElliott42
    @TimElliott42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why I love it - I taught the basics to my voice-teacher wife, who was able to create tracks for students to practice to, and use during remote lessons.

    • @genuinefreewilly5706
      @genuinefreewilly5706 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good reason to like Reaper, I beleive I can now teach most anyone how to get it up and running.
      and make it do some cool things with the scarcest amount of kit
      As Adam is correct yeh it runs on most anything but as I am finding out of late Reaper does have its own idiosyncrasies, as all software does
      The way it saves state is wacky, and its good practice to create templates for particular purposes
      Sorry for the rant, its about panning and stereo width. I finally figured it out, and have some advice when the topic comes up in Reaper, which it has numerous times in forums, and not in tutorials. I was cursing Reaper and myself

  • @lolroflstomp
    @lolroflstomp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Holy shit the spectral peaks part must save pros so much time on editing after hearing you explain how it works. I really do love this program and I'm glad I started off on Reaper and stuck with it even though I didn't understand how to use it at first.

  • @trapkat8213
    @trapkat8213 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am a Reaper user but I didn't know about the spectral peaks feature. Very cool!

  • @herbie747
    @herbie747 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been using Pro Tools since 2005. I just got a new PC and installed Reaper instead, and after 5 minutes I already found where everything was and did a quick test recording.
    I'll be sticking with Reaper now and paying the $60. It runs so much faster and boots in an instant.
    I just hope all my plugins install and work on it - Superior Drummer, T-Racks, Guitar Rig, Komplete/Kontakt, etc. I've not tried them yet.

    • @mistamichal
      @mistamichal 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can tell you for sure from my own experience that all the Komplete plugins work and also Omnisphere in case you have that.

  • @phadrus
    @phadrus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a plugin that can show “spectral peaks”?

  • @westernfilet
    @westernfilet 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So I use Reaper and totally agree it's awesome. But question, i recently decided to get into reamping. I can't get it to work with my Radial reamp box and my Audient ID44 interface. Do you have a video on reamping with Reaper? Or anyone?

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’ve got a few videos on reamping yeah. You might just need to change your extra outputs on the iD44 to be “daw through” rather than using the mixer on the ID app

    • @westernfilet
      @westernfilet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adamsteelproducer Thanks! I'll check out your other videos.

  • @tgrimes175
    @tgrimes175 ปีที่แล้ว

    What computer do you use to run reaper on?

  • @sec21
    @sec21 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay, just downloaded Reaper. When does the reprogramming start?

  • @misterringer
    @misterringer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It really is super stable. I have it and Cubase, and cubase crashes or near-crashes (audio engine spikes a LOT) quite a bit. Reaper, not a single hiccup on same projects/plugins.

    • @PianoManPaul
      @PianoManPaul 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My thoughts EXACTLY. Sometimes, once your project gets past a certain point in size or your ASIO is needed to flex some muscles, it's almost as if Cubase starts 'pouting'... then it's gone! I say "sometimes" because indeed, it's happened quicker.... e.g. I add 8 audio tracks (no VSTi's) then a couple windows flash telling of "very serious problems occurring ..." ... and I'm like "WTF?!?!??"
      Question, do you happen to have an AMD Ryzen-based rig? I'm starting to think that may be an issue here, maybe their 64bit DAWs were coded and tested more on Intel based rigs (any 32-bit version of Cubase I had in the past ran smoothly). Sorry about my long reply, but you nailed it - Cubase is sluggish and slow in speed in comparison to Reaper - and also to Presonus Studio One 5.

    • @misterringer
      @misterringer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PianoManPaul Intel for me. And mine spikes even on small projects. Super annoying. Running an RME interface which may be the only thing prevent a full crash lol

    • @PianoManPaul
      @PianoManPaul 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@misterringer "Great minds ..." I have an RME Babyface Pro FS which is now about 2 months old and I LOVE IT. You can't beat it for sound anywhere near that $ range. Actually, even my Cubase loved it as it now crashes just a BIT less frequently. Autosave set to 5 minutes, always the first setting I go to after a fresh install.

  • @MarkaryansChain
    @MarkaryansChain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Been using REAPER for 15 years and it just keeps getting better and better.

  • @TheCatGoesRawrMusik
    @TheCatGoesRawrMusik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    So. I go to university to learn audio engineering and we have to learn pro tools there which I get a bit, as it is still widely used and therefore a good thing to be confy using. BUT what I have very much noticed is that from the bit I have learned in programming classes at school more specifically "user friendliness" is. Yeah Pro Tools can do a lot of stuff really well and like the one thing that I have to say for example is that pro tools beat detective for example is just insane, but as soon as we are talking usability I hate it.
    The short summary is as someone who is very new to DAW and who had Pro Tools as their first DAW to learn, evem then it feels like pro tools wants me to learn the workflow it promotes and doesn't really allow to make better. Stuff like having to open a drop down Menu to delete a track (that track btw is now permanently deleted and can not be recovered). Just tongive the idea:
    Move to the track's name
    click on it
    move to the very bottom of the list that now opens
    Click delete.
    Like. This alone is already something I find questionable and the only reason I can think for making it this hard to delete something is, because they know you can't recover it and they don't know how to fix it so they try to make sure you really only access that button if you need it.
    (Correct me if I am wrong but I have not found anything in the preferences when I searched for a way to set up a hotkey for this)
    Ohhhhh. Hotkeys!!!! Next topic... Thisnis turning into a rant huh. I will trybto stop after this point... Actually jusy remembered another so after the next two points.
    1. Hotkeys. They can NOT BE CHANGED. My guess is marketing? So if people come from pro tools they can't get into a different DAW easily... But wait. They can just chnage the hotkeys in that other Daw to be like pro tools. Why doesn't it let me individualize the Hotkeys. That can't be so hard to implement.
    2. Also a part of individualization. Protools interface. You can't change it which once again they have proven they can make windows out of the different parts of the program. The track and the fades which... Btw.. I hate those are in separate windows... Anyways... Why don't they let you adjust stuff like you can in reaper... I honestly see that thisbone might be more annoying to implement but still...
    Yeah.. That is my personal experience and maybe those troubles have their roots in inexperience but here you go xD.

    • @johnwalter6410
      @johnwalter6410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Pro tools is archaic. Studio One smokes it like a joint. Reaper is great too. But I switched from Reaper to s1

    • @audiojake27
      @audiojake27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So you'd rather just be accidentally deleting tracks with a single keystroke?? Why

    • @kniferideaudio5145
      @kniferideaudio5145 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I keep a PT license ONLY because it is so ubiquitous. I get session sent to me and have to work with them in PT, but all of MY projects are Reaper. Unfortunately, I also have to have Adobe Audition, because for some reason the Podcast industry is in love with it. The DAW wars are pretty much over, and PT has lost but not left the throne. Were stuck looking it i's archaic interface and Microsoft Excel-like workflow, probably forever.

    • @TheCatGoesRawrMusik
      @TheCatGoesRawrMusik 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@audiojake27 ok. No. But. That is to me just a work around for that deletion being a problem. Any other DAW I have seen this fur will just allow you to press control z (or whatever command it is to you) and boom the track is back. This is not the case in Protools. It is just gone. And that is the problem.

    • @gregorydjohnson
      @gregorydjohnson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally agree, but I gotta say that hotkey customization in PT would have been an absolute nightmare when I was freelancing at 3-4 studios throughout the week a few years back. “Oh this studio has zoom in and out set to + and -“, “oh okay, this one has zoom in and out set to $ and &”, “okay this one is R and T”.

  • @barrystevens3550
    @barrystevens3550 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I spent years with PT, the most crazy thing was , crashing, and then on reboot, the PC said there is another version already running!
    I went mental, I want that time back. Happy Reaper learner /user now.

  • @cristianibarraOfficial
    @cristianibarraOfficial 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this last week i've been mixing you, playing bass and singing...and I'm going to say that: you take my life....and I'll take yours too!!!! absolutely stunning about your performance

  • @JimWinstrand
    @JimWinstrand ปีที่แล้ว

    does it run on a slate raven toutch screen?

  • @stevekobb3850
    @stevekobb3850 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really helpful. Thanks.

  • @justanotherpiccplayer3511
    @justanotherpiccplayer3511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As one forced to use sibelius at uni I've just written off Protools as bad because of AVID, I can't be dealing with more AVID nonsense, save me...
    Reaper is FABULOUS and I've been having a great time with it, its only downside is lack of instrumental plug ins that it comes with but there's plenty of free stuff out there anyways

  • @PatrickAssman
    @PatrickAssman ปีที่แล้ว

    Does Reaper has OMF/AAF capability I didn't anything in the menus. In the film industry, this feature would make it a perfect replacement for Protools as we always import AAF from the film editor.

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      At the moment no, that’s one thing PT has on reaper. Mostly because AAF is a proprietary format and hugely expensive to license, so Avid have essentially locked their competitors out

    • @PatrickAssman
      @PatrickAssman ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamsteelproducer If you know who's making Reaper, they really need to find a way to Do import export of AAF. Maybe through a 3rd party software that would really make a place for Reaper in the world of Post Production sound for film.

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m not in contact with the developers, and even if I was- licensing means you can’t just “make your own” as the original creators can sue you into the ground if you so much as look at their source code, it would have to be done “clean room” style. That’s the kind of thing that takes years of work and many peoples worth of manpower, so I wouldn’t expect to see it any time soon. You never know though…

  • @pdppdp3854
    @pdppdp3854 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    from sampling with Stereo master into Medplayer on the amiga to .. now using Maschine + Reaper. God is Great!!

  • @r.kapaun01
    @r.kapaun01 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been using Reaper for a number of years now. Very happy with the software (best 60$ I ever spent).
    Also, my version looks and acts more like Logic thanks to themes, key assignments and SWS extensions etc.
    Just not happy with the video work arounds. (I compose to picture quite a bit and well, this aspect could use some work).
    Good video and keep up the great work.

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome! What video issues have you had though? Is VLC installed on your machine? It uses that to take over and get frame accurate playback in my experience, I’ll be interested to hear what’s not right

  • @smokinmoose2
    @smokinmoose2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pro Tools was my DAW of choice for many years. I still have it in the studio because I still get Pro Tools sessions from a lot of clients. But I started using Reaper about 4-5 years ago for all new projects and for sessions sent as wav stems. I thought I would face a bit of a learning curve, and i did, to some extent, but it didn't take long to find a skin that looks almost exactly like Pro Tools and that cut the time to learn quite a bit, as it at least gave me something familiar to work with. Now, I'm in the habit of asking clients if they can send wav files instead of Pro Tools sessions. If they can, great, if not, I still have pro Tools. The other thing I like is that Reaper doesn't take up a lot of CPU power, so I find, especially with bigger sessions, it runs much smoother. And, the fact that it can use vst apps is a big plus. And, to such an extent that this is a thing in DAWs, it sounds great.

    • @piscesman54
      @piscesman54 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely, CPU usage is probably one of the most important factors. PT users complain that the Reaper UI looks outdated and unattractive. What they don't get is that that allows you to work on almost any computer, whereas PT is a huge CPU eater, and if your don't have the resources to support it, it will crash.

  • @PatrickAssman
    @PatrickAssman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can Reaper support more than stereo channel, LCR or 5.0 or 5.1 and event 7.1?

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes it can support up to 64 channels of audio per track! So things like 7.1 and Atmos are possible

  • @TheBinaryWolf
    @TheBinaryWolf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the intelligent and objective assessment of a wonderful product.

  • @abirtariq3692
    @abirtariq3692 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So this means daw doesn't matter when it comes to sound quality does it?

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No it doesn’t. It’s purely a workflow tool to get your end result.

  • @welchomestudio
    @welchomestudio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Same for Cakewalk (which is 100% free). It's got ARA, you get updates every few weeks, with not only bug fixes but also new functionalities. Granted, Cakewalk's GUI is not as flexible and customizable, but it is to a certain degree, and Cakewalk is only available for PC. Reaper has a more advanced routing system and might be a bit more stable than Cakewalk, but Cakewalk is improving on this point. Anyway, I use both and Reaper is a great DAW, no question about it. But I do prefer Cakewalk because I feel "more at home" with it... just a question of habit. Anyway, both these DAWs will let you achieve the same thing, which is to make music for little (or no) money, and get the same results as you would with much more expensive DAWs.

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cakewalk is pretty cool tbf

    • @welchomestudio
      @welchomestudio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adamsteelproducer Yes, and so is Reaper. I really feel that I could be using Reaper all the time, but Cakewalk remains my favorite DAW, mostly because I'm so used to it. But when I have to recommend a DAW to friends, I will always tell them to download and try both Reaper and Cakewalk, and make their own choice. Some will prefer one, some will prefer the other. In the end, they all end up making music without having to spend hundreds of dollars.

  • @hgurov
    @hgurov 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    After using Spectral Peaks for almost a year now, it kind of feels like Neo reading the Matrix. It's a game changer, honestly. I edit podcasts, sometimes hours of audio. So yeah...

  • @therealneojolt
    @therealneojolt ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you think about Ardour?

  • @TheRealestIdealist
    @TheRealestIdealist 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can’t find the link to the Ultimate Reaper Guide that you mentioned.

  • @studio440hzz4
    @studio440hzz4 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any idea how to sync reaper with digidesign devices ?

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Like hardware? Probably by adding control surfaces in HUI mode I’d guess

  • @niclasnightflame
    @niclasnightflame ปีที่แล้ว

    The Reaper course sounds very interesting and I'm thinking about buying it. Before that I would just like to know, if the course is accessible for blind people. For example, when you explain in the course how to do mixing, do you really explain verbally how to do it or do you expect people to see what you do, like if you said "Click here and use this icon.". I would love to learn how to use Reaper but need a course which explains everything in an accessible way that people can follow with closed eyes. I would highly appreciate discussing that with you before I buy your course. Have a good day.

  • @DrProgNerd
    @DrProgNerd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Adam's REAPER course has been a great reference tool. Spend the money. For what you save in time, it's well worth it. I use it all the time as a quick reference.

  • @KennethACrashwaggonMusic
    @KennethACrashwaggonMusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've largely gone back to another DAW for most of the editing and mixing (this is mostly due to me preferring the workflow in that DAW), but still regularly use Reaper for recording. It is indeed great.
    But, it isn't for everyone. If you're not one who likes customizing, tweaking and stuff like that, Reaper might not be for you. Defaults are weird, and some fairly basic stuff might be hard to figure out how to accomplish - so you do have to spend quite some time to set it up so it works great for you. Once you've done that though, it is very good indeed.
    The less said about Avid, the better. ;)

  • @toddd.8496
    @toddd.8496 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I licensed REAPER in 2020 basically for hobby purposes - bored during the pandemic like many folks. My goal was really just learning and having some fun with no real plans to make a living with it. That being said... I love the fact that it was only $60 which fit my budget. Two additional things great about REAPER...
    1. It opens fast even on an old machine. I installed it on a all-in-one that I bought at a thrift store for $20 that was many years old... and REAPER opens in less than 5 seconds. I installed Pro Tools First to try it out on the same exact machine and it probably took somewhere between 1-2 minutes to just open! (I didn't time it but it felt like forever) I immediately uninstalled Pro Tools and went back to the superior option in REAPER!
    2. It's tiny in file size yet packs a punch in features!
    BONUS POINTS! REAPER has some incredible free tutorials not just in this channel but in other places too that make learning the software really, really easy!

  • @MattyB3
    @MattyB3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unfortunately I have uninstalled Reaper and now that I will have to re-install would I be best served installing it on my C drive or me secondary D drive.. Thanks again for ALL the great info !!!!!!

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Makes no difference either way, it’s a tiny program that takes almost no space and 30 seconds to install. Have fun!

  • @peevee605
    @peevee605 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am well on my way to migrate to Reaper from Studio One Professional 5.5.

  • @Iesous27
    @Iesous27 ปีที่แล้ว

    My buddy went to school for audio engineering and of course they used pro tools. So he got accustomed to it. I just started diving into home recordings so i downloaded pro toold intro. For my needs, its fine. 8 audio, instrument and midi tracks.
    I dount my friend would buy the newer pro tools tho cause he has a grandfather license for an older version. 😅

  • @harrisontu264
    @harrisontu264 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got to experience number three for myself just a week ago, I used to use the batch converter but it was kind of slow. No, not kind of slow, really really really slow. And that’s cause they were only using one core to do the conversions, but they recently released batch conversions with multiple CPU cores, and now it’s really really really really fast.

  • @Salsuero
    @Salsuero 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A point you missed for reason #3 is that they don't just allow you a free update for one major version number, but the next version is also free. So it would be 6.0.0 to 7.9.9.

  • @simbaking6338
    @simbaking6338 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    After so many Protools crashes..I eventually changed to Reaper...never looked back since.

  • @petergedd9330
    @petergedd9330 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the best reasons is that Reaper is so flexible and the software is very streamlined so it can handle almost anything you throw at it. As for so called industry standard DAW's, having to pay a hefty monthly or yearly subscription is out and out daylight robbery and you'd have to be nuts to do so IMO. I paid a humble sum for Reaper and it's been my go to for many years. I dont know why it has had a name of being not 'Pro' Probably because it's so low in cost, people assume that expensive means good, not in this case, in this case it means 'Fair'.

  • @kenbrunet6120
    @kenbrunet6120 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Waiting for my laptop to arrive.
    Then I shall dload Reaper
    Then I shall purchase the Reaper guide!!
    I can't wait.

  • @drutgat2
    @drutgat2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great stuff, Adam.
    Many thanks.

  • @olibloody
    @olibloody 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been using Reaper for a while now and I didn't even know you could do some of these things 😆 cheers for that 👍

  • @SteveVicious1
    @SteveVicious1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does Reaper have an equivalent to the Pro Tools Clip Gain line? Thats what stands out in Pro Tools for me.

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah reaper has had that since about 2007. You just pull on the top of the clip box, and if turning up instead of down you hold down shift to release the “safety”. I believe they’ve added a small rotary encoder on the clip on reaper 7 as well

    • @SteveVicious1
      @SteveVicious1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adamsteelproducer Yes I see it has a gain volume handle line but can the shape of it be changed? In Pro Tools the clip gain line is like having a second volume automation line

  • @ettiennelane9173
    @ettiennelane9173 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why Reaper?
    1. Cheap (No update payments for 5-10 years)
    2. Super stable. Only a bad plugin will make it crash. (Before Reaper I thought it was normal to restart my DAW 20 times per song)
    3. Lowest CPU hit of any DAW. (Just try it, you'll see)
    4. You can design virtually any imaginable custom workflow to speed up your workflow. (Reaper gets out of your way)

  • @Cosmstack
    @Cosmstack 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Regarding Pro Tools-only plugins: it's not quite Pro Tools only, but I bought Soundshifter from Waves, only to find out I get partial functionality and if I want full functionality, it needs to run in Pro Tools. So sadly, sometimes it does happen.

    • @SuperJzero
      @SuperJzero 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The other functionality is essentially replicated by automating the sound-shifter fader in reaper. Reaper works well with Sound-Shifter.

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What functionality are you missing? I’ve just opened it and it seems to work just fine- although in my opinion it’s a pretty poor pitch shifter in 2021, I got it in a bundle

    • @Cosmstack
      @Cosmstack 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamsteelproducer the parametric and graphic components of the plugin: www.waves.com/plugins/soundshifter
      Also agreed, just as a pitch shifter, it's pretty meh

    • @adamsteelproducer
      @adamsteelproducer  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok. Looks cool, but you can pull pitch round with reapers own inbuilt tools so this isn’t a great loss

    • @Cosmstack
      @Cosmstack 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamsteelproducer yea totally, and it is kind of on me for not properly checking the page, but it did seem neat for sound design at the time.
      But it is an example of a plugin with limited functionality depending on the DAW

  • @No-to4kd
    @No-to4kd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i wasn’t super convinced until i learned that Nik from Noisia has moved from Cubase to Reaper

  • @jeffroberts_tunes
    @jeffroberts_tunes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wrappers around old code base. Totally believe this (I work as a programmer in a different industry). And you see it in things like bouncing or importing audio in PT where there's the little "I'm doing something now" icon that pops up, and if you do one single freakin other thing, like a mouse click in a window it stalls and sometimes takes minutes (or resorting to Task Manager) before going tits up. That's just pitiful in something that costs that much. Crappy memory management and complete lack of interrupts, you know...things that would mean getting a D on your C++ project.

  • @dannyboystudios6604
    @dannyboystudios6604 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I also use Reaper for video editing, it’s not great at it but it’s what I have and does a good enough job for what I need.

    • @andreasfranzmann9634
      @andreasfranzmann9634 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's another thing hardly anybody talks about. We are all audio guys, which means that most of us sometimes need to do a little basic video work (editing, subtitels, multicam stuff). Reaper can do it.
      Another reason why I switched from Studio One to Reaper. Great point!