There isn't a single reason to do so, his settle location was the best one, if he had done what you said he would have lost the river and be much more vulnerable from sea. All of that for a single fish.
I heard and understood that you really wanted the God of the Sea pantheon ASAP. However, as a player who has never played a serious game of Civ 5, I must ask you: If you would've known from the start that the fish and whales-tile to the north could've been in your capital, would you have moved? If you would not, care to explain the reasoning in detail? Just a plain answer works aswell.
"This is clearly not a friendly trireme" - Well, you did declare war on him just for his scout being near your capital, so obviously he won't be friendly.
Do you really not get it? He wanted embassy for his pantheon pick. I refused to give him that advantage. His scout ended a turn next to my capital to see my cap. That's suicide fro the scout. I offered to trade embassies at that point so get equal info. When re refused I attacked the scout.
Is it weird that I rarely watch/play full games ? I just seem to love the first few era so damn much.
That's such an annoying exploit of the blockade mechanic. He can sit in deep water indefinitely and you can't work your tiles until compass tech.
that boat play by exo spiced things up. good challenge to overcome though. Can't wait to watch the next parts.
"give me embassy or I start shooting" 11:10 savage salt deliciousness
Especially when a turn or two earlier he rejected the embassy offer.
I'm interested if there was a reason beyond salt for this.
We have some slow viewers today. Go back and listen to why I initially reject embassy and then offer it later. It's pretty clear.
Blockade mechanic is too OP if it allows blocking of tiles that an enemy has a warship on or tiles behind the enemy's warships...unemersive.
spent countless hours watching your stuff. keep it up.
People killing each other over whose imaginary fish friend is better. Only in Civ. Oh wait...
if only you settled one tile north :(
There isn't a single reason to do so, his settle location was the best one, if he had done what you said he would have lost the river and be much more vulnerable from sea. All of that for a single fish.
I think he said that so that he would get the extra fish & whale in the cap
lalalaprout Yes but he didn't know of these until much later, which is my point.
Did u upload this with higher quality? Looks good as fok
I read through comments and watched the video but I don't understand why hes scouting for fish pantheon when he already knew you had it
That unlucky deep water tile Jesus fucking christ
I heard and understood that you really wanted the God of the Sea pantheon ASAP. However, as a player who has never played a serious game of Civ 5, I must ask you:
If you would've known from the start that the fish and whales-tile to the north could've been in your capital, would you have moved? If you would not, care to explain the reasoning in detail?
Just a plain answer works aswell.
Probably. It's still moving to a hill.
+FilthyRobot cheers.
fish faith gooooooooooooooo :x
"This is clearly not a friendly trireme" - Well, you did declare war on him just for his scout being near your capital, so obviously he won't be friendly.
Do you really not get it? He wanted embassy for his pantheon pick. I refused to give him that advantage. His scout ended a turn next to my capital to see my cap. That's suicide fro the scout. I offered to trade embassies at that point so get equal info. When re refused I attacked the scout.
Lmao smoked early game by poly 😂😂😂
I saw this live you couldn't do anything I don't know why the dude didn't just accept embassy
Because he's a mad baby
Slam picks coastal civ, doesn't get fish faith, whines like a turd