How Do Black Holes Fit the Young-earth Creation Perspective? - Dr. Danny Faulkner (Conf Lecture)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
- This lecture is from our 2017 'Is Genesis History?' conference. We invited a number of scientists and scholars to teach in-depth on the Creation/Flood model. If you like this lecture, you can buy, download and watch over 70 more at: ☞bit.ly/2WsUHx1
In this video, astronomer Danny Faulkner discusses some aspects of Big Bang cosmology, like black holes, dark matter, and dark energy from a young-earth perspective.
Dr. Danny Faulkner received his PhD in astronomy from Indiana University. He is distinguished Professor Emeritus at the University of South Carolina-Lancaster, where he taught astronomy and physics for over 26 years. Since January, 2013, he has been the staff astronomer at Answers in Genesis in northern Kentucky.
For more information about Dr. Faulkner, please visit: bit.ly/3kGkcFV.
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
![[[OFFICIAL MV]] เอิ้นขวัญให้อ้าย- อ๊ะอาย สกุณาพร | ค่ายเพลงเป็นหนึ่ง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/83x6L3X3qh0/mqdefault.jpg)
Liistening to Dr Faulkner ‘s fascinating and informative teaching of the science of Biblical history comes to life through his knowledge of ancient and contemporary astrology 🎉
Give glory to God for smart guys like this. I had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Danny at the Creation Museum, a most awesome place that everyone needs to see along with the Ark Encounter. You will be awestruck. Great vacation destinations.
I reckon the ark project was the greatest thing that happened to Australia one less scammer here we have a happy clapper prime Minister and his pedophile founded Hill song church you can all of that congeratgation for free Trump's is also his mate.
I thought it was garbage.
I’d love to meet him. Thanks for the info on the museum.😊
@@Magnum-Farce Nice! So don't return!
@@TrevoltIV Does open discussion and criticism intimidate you, champ?
Please put subtitles in different languages, this is so important 🙏🙏🙏
Are countries in South America expected to learn English for all of the visitors from the US? If not, why the duplicity?
@@beestoe993 I think her point was to get the message to the most people
Entiendo
@@beestoe993 Aaah the douche has arrived.
I love listening to this man! It's so refreshing to listen to a BIBLE believing astronomer ❤
The Bible declares
Proverbs 25:2 KJV
It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.
When you see a galaxy, you are looking at differing rates of time and differing measures of distance. Outside of a galaxy, there is very little matter mass and gravity to slow down time and shorten distance.
What slows down light *from our perspective* is the gravity in the vicinity that slows down the *rate* of time. (It’s not that light slows down, it’s the rate of time that slows down.)
So what happens where there is no gravity is that the rate of time speeds up relative to our rate of time so that starlight travels the same (or greater) distance at a faster rate of time. It’s still traveling the *same relativistic frame speed* but an entire second passes by from our perspective at a much faster rate, in a fraction of a second *where there is no gravity* to slow down time. So for most of the time, starlight is traveling through space at a faster rate of time relative to our rate of time.
That means starlight arrives much more instantaneously because the rate of time is free from the effects of gravity for most of the way. With no mass of its own, starlight arrives instantaneously as it experiences no time of its own traveling at the speed of light. We see things in slow motion *where time is slowed down* by gravity.
This relativistic effect allows for a young earth since it doesn’t take billions of lightyears for starlight to arrive through the *void* of space where there is no matter to slow down *time.*
yeah, it doesn't work that way. the slowing of time from our local gravity is not very large.
@@eniszita7353 It’s slows down a lot more and it speeds up a lot more.
@@JungleJargon But you avoid doing the actual math because it doesn't support your belief system.
Thanks so much for that explanation. It was brilliantly put. Very clear…explaining a phenomenon of which I had been unaware, but makes a LOT of sense.
I took a look at some of your other comments. Ignore the detractors. You have very interesting perspective on a variety of related topics worth checking out.
@@dasan9178 Thanks you so much! 😊 It's not every day I get positive feedback! 😃
O K, everyone who is over their heads rise your hand.
I haven’t a clue....
I don't know, he is yapping about "indeed we went to the moon". Evidently it's all in his head because indeed that never happened! Oh and showing us two CGI spinning balls and calls them stars! So it's not over your head. It's just bs and you recognize bs when you hear it!😉
@@kellyanneree3252 Did you know that telescopes have found the lunar landing spots on the surface of the moon? We went there, landed, walked around and rovered around, and returned safely to earth.
Not understanding the professor’s discussion doesn’t mean he’s making it up or lying. Nor does understanding it mean it’s all true.
In this case, however, the information presented was all established science…though the professor did challenge some of the assumptions made by scientists in areas where science still lacks answers. If no one ever challenged assumptions, there would be very little scientific (or any other) progress.
It seems to me he’s trying to get people to use their intelligence and really THINK critically about information presented rather than simply accepting everything they’re told.
It’s a fact, after all, that there is a lot of media and government manipulation of our beliefs. They do it quite easily by manipulating our perceptions and emotions. When our emotions take over, we tend to stop thinking. This is especially true when we feel our own assumptions being challenged.
It’s often not easy, but questioning assumptions is rarely a bad idea…whether we agree or disagree with someone else’s conclusions. Think about it before denouncing the professor.
Thank you so much for this. So many things you have explained for years i've wondered about.
We're so glad it was helpful to you!
It's so good to hear an astronomer that believes in God. That was a very good explanation of a black hole . . . er . . . some sort of compact object.
Believes in what god?? Because the creator God says there is a firmament above us and this guy claims we went to the moon! The moon is a light and nobody has ever landed on that light!!! Listen to the book of Enoch and you will see it's impossible!
Blah, blah, blah... he would rather sound intelligent than actually delve into biblical truth.
@@kellyanneree3252 "nobody has ever landed on that light!!!"
Your problem is, as time gores on, more people are educated and see your ignorance.
@@kellyanneree3252 "Listen to the book of Enoch and you will" Sure because books are automatically true! I read it!
The once asked Einstein what it was like to be the smartest man alive. He said he didn't know and to go ask Nikola Tesla. Anyways...Electric Universe. And Tesla is having more fun than anybody.
Tesla was a warlock who sat in a pentagram blew his load chanted whilst unclean to summon LOOSE A FAR to bring forth a satanic system built on dirty electricity and filthy frequency that can open up all sorts of filth.
@@justinmorton7201 aren't you creative. Good for you.
That is actually a made up quote. Aside from its first appearance coinciding with the rise in popularity in flat earth believers of the late 2,000s and not appearing before this, tesla was irrationally critical of einstein and einstein with his acedemic and scientific achievements never regarded tesla as anything more than a street performer.
Fun but unimportant trivia: At 24:17, Dr. Faulkner mentioned Cygnus X-1. This was used in two songs by the rock band Rush. By the way, has anyone seen Dr. Faulkner and David Coppedge of Creation-Evolution Headlines at the same time? (Very similar in voice and appearance.)
Excellent presentation, thank you.
What an interesting video!
I think we need another video about how the current understanding of the big bang has been disproved by James Webb's recent observations.
Here's a tip. If you read about science, don't go to anti-science sources because they Iie.
@@Magnum-Farce Lol... what do you mean "anti-science"? Science is based on the scientific method which is, in its purest form, the testing of hypotheses. There is no way to be "anti-science" so long as you are testing theories, either experimentally or theoretically with math or reason. Therefore, asking for a video about the James Webb observations upsetting the current theory of the big bang is not "anti-science" at all; such a video would be the purest kind of scientific discussion there is.
@@deepwaters2334 So using a "method" to test explanations and claims, was it true that JW observations were not consistent with theory?
@@Magnum-Farce Of course! That's why everyone was surprised! They found fully formed galaxies that were "older" than they should be given their current theory. Many of the JWST observations have driven physicists to consider different views of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Personally, I think the old views are silly and the new ideas are much needed to get closer to the truth.
@@deepwaters2334 But you can't tell us how you fact-checked this after I specifically stated the need and you sang about "method"? Amazing.
Now, look it up on a real science channel and tell us what you find. If you don't want to, I can do it right here for us.
A good presentation is made tacky by bad camera movement.
Not just a couple times in this video, but also in several other videos in the series, someone unnecessarily messes with the camera and it drops down.
It's perfectly fine with no one touching it. Leave the camera alone.
Great presentation
No doubts for me.
I remember more than one bump . In fact quite a few.
Yes, Genesis is His-Story
There is no credible evidence of a young earth. These people are a slap in the face of humanity
@@lordzettachad6078
Where did the first atom or any subatomic particle come from?
Are Atoms Eternal? (From everlasting to everlasting?).
Is any matter Eternal in your evolution worldview? Or did atoms have a beginning? If so how did atoms come into being/existence?
Oh a few more questions that I forgot?
Do you have a theory on what atoms are made of?
Do you believe in invisible forces like electricity? You can't see it, but you can see the effect it has on things that it comes in contact with.
Do you believe in other invisible forces such as gravity?
What is gravity exactly? Is it a particle? Is it a wave?
Do you believe in other Invisible things that have no taste, touch or smell, The laws of Physics and Quantum Mechanics, how were these invisible laws set in motion?
Are electrons and protons waves or particles?
The smallest molecule in the human body has around 50,000 atoms in its make up, what caused unintelligent atoms to come together and arrange their protons in very specific extremely complex ways to make the first molecule that formed the first life.
And last but not least!
Why is there something rather than nothing?
Black holes don’t exsist
Hypothetical science is their story.
I need more ! 💕🌿🕊️✝️ God bless you all!
As I listen I imagine a dolphin trying to understand and theorizing about the technology that propelles the ships and boats that it plays with and then that same dolphin looks at an airplane and has to rethink everything.
Then birds come to mind and I wonder how they look at and think about aircrafts.
My mind is a constant jigsaw puzzle.
My question is if we could see all of this stuff (dark matter ...) how much of the universe could we see
10:45 as i recall rockets didn't actually go 25,000 mph, because all you really have to do to get into space is to keep going up until you get there. so the speed is based more on how much fuel you can carry to get into space and where the orbit will be. low orbit requires about 17,500mph.
Good point. You could get close with a large helium balloon and wouldn’t be climbing very fast.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 - That’s why you can only get close. Eventually the balloon is going to reach a height where the air is too thin.
When they say “escape velocity”, I think what they actually mean is for objects that don’t have a propulsion system.
If you have a propulsion system, you only need enough force to overcome the gravitational attraction at your current position.
So the “escape velocity” for a system with propulsion is variable.
the apollo rocket to the moon went about 25,000 miles per hour to make the trip.
Electic universe, THEY DON'T EXIST!
unedited photos of what they speculate are "black holes" almost look like the description of cherubim
Lol
Great vid!
Nobody has ever said dark energy or dark matter have anything to do with Evolution this guy is just talking bulshit
What about the electric universe model? Wallace Thornhill? Thunderbolts project? It’s pretty attacked.
Whenever something is attacked like that by mass media, it give credibility in my mind.
Scientific method has scientists ruthlessly attacking all aspects of theory and other scientists hypotheses. But it isn't the attacking that makes things valid, it's the findings. There are many excuses to believe in stuff, and they mostly amount to excuses to ignore findings.
Please correct me if I'm wrong !!!
Because of Einstein's relativity, time depends on the mass of the object, and for this reason, it is not equal to all objects.
For example: on the moon, time goes faster by about 56 microseconds per day.
This means that :
- If the Earth is only 6000 years old, the time on the Moon is now 2 minutes ahead
- but if the Earth is 5 billion years old, the time on the Moon is 1182 days ahead (more than 3 years).
The same applies to the other objects of the solar system.
Could this mean that I see all the objects that are smaller than Earth (all the solid planets and all the satellites of the solar system) a little bit in the future, and all the object that are bigger than Earth a little bit in the past ?
I heard about the black holes that time near them goes 84 times sllower than on Earth .
And if the earth is 6000 years old, near black holes only 71 years passed since creation !?
My mass is too much... I need a mass reduction. I can totes understand this guy, makes more sense than any science teacher I ever had.
Changed my mind, I was one of those just a day ago telling people, Black holes are just a theory and that dark matter and energy is just a rescue device 🤣 not anymore.
They don’t exsist
"dark matter and energy is just a rescue device" That's what I think. About to watch the video so we'll see.
You had it right the first time! This guy thinks we went to the moon! Just another deceiver or deceived! Notice all the CGI"S just like the "went to the moon" agency!
Fake space race paid for Cold War and made CIA the monster it is today.
"just a theory " All the tech you will ever see and use is based upon scientific theory. Theories in science aren't hunches. They are the best working explanations that allow prediction of outcomes.
How you explain or Define the firmament . Will test your Christianity
i completely Do NOT believe in the existance of black holes, dark matter, or dark energy
That’s racist.
I think the writer of Hebrews put it best when he wrote, "...and upholding all things by the of his power...". Galaxies are upheld by dark matter. Are we witnessing evidence of the power of God's Word?
No we aren't....at all
@@anthonysmith778 okay closed minded fool!
@@Dimabuildingadventures you're right. Believing in ridiculous superstitious nonsense is direct evidence of an open mind. My bad
@@Dimabuildingadventures doesn't the Bible say if you call someone a fool, you shall be in danger if hell fire? Mathew 5:22. Looks like you've got some explaining to do.
Yes
Chuck Missler suggested that the speed of light is slowing down due to sin. Any thoughts.
Light is a particle riding a wave function. This means that you have a very small piece of matter going up and down giving of a certain color. Larger pieces on larger functions that illuminate at those wavelengths. Each with a magnetic field that interacts with each other.
Thoughts about light slowing down due to sin: somewhere in the Bible there's a verse that says the earth groans with the weight of the sins of the world, Paul mentions demonic beings in the atmosphere as being powers and/or ruling authority who distort things, and creation is degrading as time goes on due to sin. Also, Christions could do very much to rehabilitate the world if we would gather together under Christ instead of dividing ourselves. Etc...
@@Christina-dw8we sin has nothing to do with light slowing down. It's like saying because of sin a cars slows down. Physics operates as God commands. Light slows down like every other thing when it goes through something that slows it down; like glass.
Hebrews 11:1 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
"90% of the universe is made of things we cant see"
Yep
Do you have a link for a talk on antibiotic resistance according to creationism? I'd love to watch that!
About gravity; answer this question: why do we weigh less the closer we get to the center of the earth? Miners in tunnels closer to the center weigh less than at the surface. It's like the static electrical effect.
@Chris Law th-cam.com/video/8TbrGaQ9Zc0/w-d-xo.html
Check this out
Could it be that all matter exerts a gravitational pull and that having some matter above you pulling you upward can offset the downward pull of matter beneath you?
If you can't figure out this easy problem, you've got no business letting an electric universe roll around in your mind.
@@rubiks6 what is gravity? What we know is that it pulls us to the earth. An orbit is falling and missing the object you are falling to.
We know that we have dipoles on stuff. Opposites attracted and same repelled. Lined up, you have a channel for electic current. Magnetic fields twist it til you have a knot called a plasmid. Matter collects around it. This is why the sun is the largest ball of mass in the solar system with planets orbiting around it. More like spiraling around it
@@georgeescamilla2988 - Gravity does not have an opposite. Gravitationally, everything attracts everything.
@@rubiks6 Check this video out. He explains it very well. It was from this that I found out that miners weigh less in mines.
th-cam.com/video/YkWiBxWieQU/w-d-xo.html
Evolution is biology, champ. Only creationists think otherwise. Don't need no black holes.
@Charles Brady Tried researching evolutionary biology online, champ?
Probably 10s of thousands of documents.
Try it. Educate yourself, or wallow. It's up to you.
Why can't dark matter be solar systems that have a rocky star at the center or maybe black holes that have no excretion disks? It may be that these are much more common than previously thought. For that matter rogue planets could be everywhere in-between the stars of galaxies.
Since we can't detect most things that aren't self illuminating, we have no idea of how much matter is in-between us and the data we are trying to detect. Therefore, the actual data we are able to detect could be completely compromised by interference we don't have the ability to quantify or predict. I suspect this to be true for the whole expanding/accelerating universe conjecture. When looking at the deep field images there seem to be lots of galaxies that are much less red shifted that are probably at similar distance based on size and illumination. Longer waves are better at traveling farther than short ones especially when we are not able to detect what interference may be between us and the object. Variability in red shift could simply be the undetectable filtering out of shorter waves.
Could it be that there are mathematical algorithms governing the physics of the universe which are not observable, because they are functioning in higher dimensions which are affecting our observable dimensions?
I.e. laws of physics not based in the first 4 dimensions but still affecting said 4 dimensions
I guess that's the role that the dark matter and dark energy seem to play... But if we don't know what they are, then it seems like one could just claim whatever they want about the unknown forces since no one knows
@@thevulture5750 it does =), God bless friend!
It's not dark matter. It's differing rates of time and differing measures of distance.
Thanks for doing this!
What about Birkland Currents?
Nathan they don't believe in them
The currents in Birkland suck this time of year. Can't even get any good sailing in. I hear the fishing is ok though.
@@Stormvetprime01 Is this meant to be a serious reply? Birkland was a Norwegian scientist who lived 100 years ago and did work on electrical currents named after him.
GB means Gamma-ray Binary
Good.
Misleading title. Otherwise quite valuable and engaging.
Could black holes be the bottomless pit?
I found the following videos of interest when it comes to this subject matter. Copy the following titles and paste in search bar above:
Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing | Space News
Plasma Physics' Answers to the New Cosmological Questions by Dr. Donald E. Scott - Full Video
If you start with a faulty premise you will likely get a faulty answer.
Assuming there must have been a time when there was nothing is a faulty premise. Logic tells us that for anything to exist, there has to be an eternal cause.
There called fallicies. Dont believe a word this guy says.
@@St.FighterZ - And just who in cursed creation might you be?
@@rubiks6 😎
@@hansdemos6510 - God is eternal.
@@hansdemos6510 - I'm sorry, sir, but you do not make the rules of argumentation, science, and logic. Those rules are determined by God who rules over all things.
Is antimatter the same as dark matter? Is there any such thing as antimatter?
Is there a chance the matter just isn't illuminated, like large asteroids. We don't see the Ort cloud of our solar system...do we? I'm sure galaxies must have massive debris clouds of small non reflective matter
Q. How does dark matter, if it exist, relate to Gen 1:1-2, the period before light was created but matter existed?
If you watch the video and listen carefully, you'll know why no one can answer your question.
@@rubiks6 I'm sure Dr. Faulkner has given much thought to questions like this.
@@leroybrown9143 - and ... ?
@@rubiks6 there is an answer, YOU don't have it, so why are you talking 🤔 move along and let someone thoughtful respond.
@@leroybrown9143 - First you're going to have to tell us what dark matter is (and then collect your Nobel prize).
"there is an answer, YOU don't have it, so why are you talking 🤔 move along and let someone thoughtful respond."
Nobody has it. That's what I tried to tell you. You asked a thoughtless question.
Thank you too.
Creationism took a hit from that 1st pick of one... I always felt belief in black holes was a matter of my faith, but there are two pictured now.. and the math always supported it. I thought our universe was the inside of a huge black hole, and my faith carried my belief like a lamb in the arms of a giant shepherd..
Why would your faith hinge on black holes? They're just the center of galaxies and collapsed stars, nothing about that says anything about God.
Please provide videos in Indian languages especially in Malayalam or Hindi because too much atheists mocking biblical creation.Thanks
I believe antimatter simply IS space. I may be wrong but it seems legit to me.
Most scientists..."We don't know what it is, but we KNOW it's not God or a Creator!"
I also have doubts about these things because those who created the foundation of our society, such as Tesla, Steinmetz, etc, indicated that the atomistic ideology was incorrect and idiocy. They may not have used those exact words but the inference is there.
But we don't use opinions to form exploitable scientific theory. Science was developed to eliminate belief and bias.
"such as Tesla," Tesla was involved in engineering and electrics. He didn't "create the foundation of our society".
wind and electrons are detectable.neutrons however. ...
Neutrons are quite detectable. Ask any of the physicists that design nuclear weapons or nuclear reactors.
"GB" = Gauss-Bonnet 'gravity'
00
⁰0
00
⁰
0
This guy talks serious science.
No, he is a liar! Starting with the nonsense that antibiotics resistance is not proof for evolution. Because it is!
The expansion of the universe was rapid during the initial inflation stage. Could this be related in the Bible to the Lord unrolling the scrolls?
That is the idea that has scientists moving away from the big bang theory because of it being too much like the biblical creation.
[God says,] "I made the earth and created man on it; it was my hands that *_stretched out the heavens,_* and I commanded all their host."
- Isaiah 45:12 (ESV) (Emphasis added.)
Isaiah 42;5
Isaiah 40;22
Isaiah 45;12
Zechariah 12;1
Isaiah 48;13
Jeremiah 10;12
Psalm 104;2
Isaiah 44;24
This is cosmic inflation.
@@rubiks6 think of it like this, even the curtain can only be stretched so far. The idea is comparison in nature. Meaning that what God created was like taking a sheet of fabric and stretching it out. So to He already knew what it would look like as it was created in its place.
@@georgeescamilla2988 - Good day to you, fellow believer. I often get in long discussions with non-believers because of our differing opinions but I don't get into long discussions with believers because we see things the same way and agree on the same ideas.
With that in mind, I thought i'd just say, "Hi."
Hi!
Easy, they don't exist. "Answer not a fool according to his folly, Lest thou also be like unto him." Proverbs 26:4
Sure. A 2000 year old book with no science in it means something about advanced physics. LOL
@@Gr-Ra5 An entire balanced world made from a "Big Bang" makes sense to you? That the "Universe" is forever expanding at the speed of light makes sense to you? That the moon has phases because after telling everyone that the sun lends the moon its light NASA is now saying that the moon gets its light from the sun reflecting off the Earth?
Great
About dark matter. so the guy postulated that light emitted from a galaxy should be equal to its mass? But the equation doesn't add up?
So the solution I'd not bad assumption or bad math it's gotta be magical undetectable matter that has no consistent mass to volume profile and whose only characteristic is equating to the remainder in a bad math formula to force a planet sized peg in a pin hole?
Sound legit.
25,000 mph…. The moon is 250,000 miles away….. why did it take 3 days to get there?
nothing has ever left the earth !
Do you think space travel all happens at the same speed, champ?
@@Gr-Ra5 …. They have limited weight
So… limited fuel…. They are not going to be speeding up then slowing down…. Then speeding back up….
3 days = 72 hours… so they average 3,500 mph going to the moon…. the space station travels 17,100 mph just circling the earth…
Space is dangerous….. the faster you get to the moon…. and get back… the better….
Maybe they took the scenic route 😳
When you realize we live inside a accretion disk of a super massive blackhole.
I thank the Lord that this is something that I'm not supposed to have any interest in!! God Bless those souls who find it remotely fascinating - to me I'd far rather watch paint dry!
For all science claims to know about space. All we do with it is to send out objrcts to observe more.
Yeah. That's how science works. Trying to learn as much as we can about the universe in which we all live. It's a good thing.
black holes arent real
The expansion of the universe after the initial expansion seems to have been somewhat low until a few billion years ago when the expansion started to rapidly increase. Could this because of sin or rebellion in the universe? (Dates are from scientific literature, not mine. )
It could be that the universe was only recently created.
[God says,] "I made the earth and created man on it; it was my hands that *_stretched out the heavens,_* and I commanded all their host."
- Isaiah 45:12 (ESV) (Emphasis added.)
See those words, "stretched out the heavens"? - what they actually mean is that God *_stretched_* out the heavens. How hard is that to understand?
😂😂😂😂
They dont
Cherubim
water
I'm convinced that dark matter is a plug number to make the math work.
now they think it doesn't even exist.
An electric universe makes way more sense than dark matter and dark energy theories. Why would not the Most High create a universe of action and energy then lightyears of nothing?
D'oh
Another deceiver or deceived! "Went to the moon".....Ah no!!!
Where did black holes come from? The effects of the Fall.
Creationists live in an alternate universe 🙉🙈🙊
I think black holes show us what hell could be like
If you believe the Earth is a spinning ball billions of years old and in evolution you are commiting the sin of believing a lie. Not wanting to be an outcast is no excuse for not seeking the truth. We all sin and will be held accountable for them. BTW believing a lie is the first sin
Great video. Until the final, unnecessary comment, about the immense creator. It's all well and good to impute the universe to a creator, but no one who believes in the said creator and I truly mean no one, has ever described the nature of this creator nor proposed what physical form this creator takes. It's too facile an explanation to say the creator made the universe, especially when one has no idea what the nature of this creator is.
By definition, the Creator is eternal, immaterial, and unchangeable. So the Creator does not have a physical nature, He is not made out of parts. That is standard Christian belief for 2000 years. The Creator of space and time and energy isn't made out of these things. The laws of logic are an example of something that is not material.
We can see the effects of the Creator without knowing everything about Him. I imagine you believe in dark energy and you don't know the nature of that. We can know a lot about the Creator from the universe and the consciences. For more information, we go to special revelation from prophets. These prophets writings are the Old and New Testament, where God tells us more about himself. In fact, the Creator entered creation, that is, the eternal Father sent the eternal Son, Word (logos) to this earth, taking humanity to Himself. His name is Jesus of Nazareth, He is the Anointed One, or Christ/Messiah. He fulfilled prophecy and rose literally from the dead after dying on the cross as the substitute for sinners who trust in Him. If you trust in the Lord Jesus,your sins are forgiven. The existence of the Creator fits with several philosophical arguments for the existence of the Creator - such as various cosmological arguments outlined in the books Five Proofs for the Existence of God. And the existence of the Creator is consistent with the laws of logic and the fine tuning of the laws of physics.
@trythisbeautiful7492… that’s all well and good but there’s no consensus that jesus was a son of god, for example. A lot of people say he was just one in a line of prophets. Now you see why science and religion are vastly different intellectual universes. In science disagreements give way to consensus over time. Religion is pure whimsy. Anyone can make a strong logical case for god, especially on a foundationnof highly suspect premises. But I m afraid science has much highrr standards of proof. Until we see God in all his glory, all of these religions will b mothibg but glorified fairy tales.
Gods moral law is written on your heart and Jesus and the gospels are real. Genetics proves Adam and Eve. Original sin proves the state of the world by man believing creation over the creator. Case closed
Can gravity exist apart from mass or matter?
or in infinitely curved space, for that matter? (no pun intended) A "void" is much different that empty space. Empty space still contains four things: length, width, height and time - the latter required at least in some form to observe it. A void means nothing, that is - no thing.
While all this is really fascinating, how can such knowledge impact our lives for better or worse?
Can understanding space bring us nearer to God?
Should we be spending so much time and money exploring space, when we don't even understand our planet first?
The Bible talks a bit about stars and the heavens. The passage says, "The heavens declare the glory of God ...". Maybe they are worth studying a little bit. Maybe that's why God made them and made them viewable.
@@hansdemos6510 That's a fir point. I wasn't thinking in terms of all creation being as a whole, but rather in parts. Thank you.
I know, based on what God has revealed, that the universe and everything in it was created by Him, including black holes, sadly the case was not adequately made that they testify of a young Earth. Try again when you learn some more about them, which I am sure they will.
This guy doesn't even understand what scientist mean when they say dark energy or dark matter. If the scientific version of God of the gas they will figure it out one day right now it is a unknown variable in equations of the forces of the universe. Seriously a 10-minute talk with an actual scientist would have corrected this guy's misunderstanding
lol,you don t know what your talking about...first of all secientifics don t have all the answers....you talk like you understand dark energy and dark matter ,get lost...........to finish most of the present concepts of our universe made bye scientific is wrong....
@@karinesmith2551 when the world makes you think it's wrong what research have you done you just don't like those people way smarter than you. This is all just bitterness you're demonstrating
@@darkeen42 smarter than me that can believe the origins of thing ,everything is evolution?smarter you said? i like a good sense a humor ,that s a good thing ,but bro your anything but smart.......i challenge you right now to give your best evidences for the theory you stand for,please do ,let see......put your smarter arguments forward,lolllll,let see how smart you are.....
@@karinesmith2551 that was easy
@@karinesmith2551 evolutionist constantly making predictions that come true the Bible has never managed to do that it makes predictions that completely fail all the time. Even the prophecy that supposedly foretold it coming of Jesus the people that invented Jesus had a mistranslated version of Mary was never supposed to be a virgin she was supposed to be a young unwed woman those are two different words that were mistranslated in an entire religion was created out of that Miss translation and that is your religion. Learn about your faith learn about evolution before you claim to know anything. Look up the council of nicea where your Bible was created we have the minutes of the meeting we know why they put in what they did and left out what they did their own political agendas. There used to be a Gospel of Thomas a Gospel of Mary Gospel of Judas and infancy Gospels but you can't subjugate Jews if you leave in the Gospel of Judas and you can't subjugate women if you leave in the Gospel of Mary so they took him out and admitted it at the time that that is why they built your Bible like they did for the purpose of hate and subjugation and hording power. I mean it was illegal to translate the Bible into languages people actually spoke for centuries because the the church name of people read the Bible themselves they wouldn't believe the b******* but I guess they had more respect for you than you deserved
This guy doesn't even know what gravity is.
@Patrick ParkrrShort answer, no. I do not know what gravity is. What I do know is that it has to do with electro magnetic frequencies and not the attraction of mass, or else we would not be able to hack gravity with electro magnets and levitation. Nikola Tesla understood gravity way better than I.
@Patrick Parkrr Of course! He designed everything wonderfully!
Jesus said in the end all these things in the sky will get insane , suddenly, and the people showing that,will loose their minds.
Blackhole to the speed of light... I knew you had it in you to move faster.
New atheist help hotline. They call... nobody answers.
Part of the problem is the Big Bang model just assumes gravity as dominant with no electrical forces, each time more electrical/magnetic features of the universe are detected they are just epicycled in instead of seeing the Electric Universe paradigm shift that keeps getting things right to begin with.
If your faith is strong enough,none of them exist.If your faith is strong enough,nothing exists!
Black holes lol not biblical cosmology. the end.
Why not?
Up to 2:15, and he is making the big mistake of saying that naysayers think that if you can't "see" something, it doesn't exist.
He doesn't know what he is talking about.
Things that we cannot see obviously exist, but black holes and dark matter are just mathematical models that have no sense of actuality in the real world.
Look up Thunderbolts, electric universe, if you want to see research that matches what is observed (not just seen) in the marvelous nature God has made for us.
Gravity?
Purple alligators?
.
Wrong !!!
God said, i have seven thousand (7000) remnants Scientist in the science filed , who have never bent the knee to nor bowed to Baal"
OR Atheistic evolution. Kkkkkkk.
Thank you Doc and Genesis History.
All the wonder just cries a glorious, mysterious, peculiar God.
A living God we cannot fathom in our vile, miniscule minds, and times.
The mass of an object can be so great that light cannot escape from it.That is a black planet not a hole.
It's a hole because it's a void in space. Also, black holes have zero size (singularity). Now that I think if it, that is more of a hole that any other hole!
@@juliandoyley2103 Why can,t it be a dense planet?
@@garyavey7929 - that would be a neutron star. Neutron stars are about 15 miles wide but weigh more than the sun! The mathematics describing a black holes demonstrate that it's a singularity (no dimensions). Technically, the event horizon is the "hole". Amazing stuff really but all the fun was sucked out of it when I had to do all the maths for my masters in physics. Wikipedia has some info that you may find interesting - en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
@@juliandoyley2103 Is that site reliable?
@@Old_Demon04 - I know this from studying for my masters in physics and this website agrees with what I studied so I gave it as a reference.