New York Controllers CONFUSED with A FLIGHT FROM JFK to LGA!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2019
  • VFR flight from JFK to LGA... sounds good.

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @VASAviation
    @VASAviation  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1267

    Repo flight from JFK to LGA? Not too rare, is it?

    • @kaamfinitii
      @kaamfinitii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      This always happens

    • @vihai
      @vihai 4 ปีที่แล้ว +158

      Apparently having big planes flying VFR is not that common there :)

    • @rhs2000vtec
      @rhs2000vtec 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Not rare at all - my company does it almost once a week.

    • @conorherget313
      @conorherget313 4 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      It’s the fact that it was done under VFR.

    • @Gr8fulbluz
      @Gr8fulbluz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      My Ops Spec do not allow us to takeoff VFR from airports with operating ATC. I have never seen it happen. On flights that short I always wonder 'Should I bring the gear up?'

  • @retard3448
    @retard3448 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5205

    JFK: refile your flight plan
    Pilot: I'M GOING ACROSS THE STREET GOD DAMNIT

    • @Dubanx
      @Dubanx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +377

      I just had this picture of a 747 stuck in traffic on I91 and screaming out the window at other drivers.

    • @FakeJeep
      @FakeJeep 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Laughing far too hard at this.

    • @TheHawaiianc
      @TheHawaiianc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      man i would hate just move to the next gate lol

    • @Plyst3
      @Plyst3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      The mental image of a jet casually strolling over to the BQE (Brooklyn Queens express for you non New York familiar) and then going up the highway to LGA.. hahaha

    • @Dubanx
      @Dubanx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      That one asshole behind him honks the horn one too many times so he hits the throttle and blows like 20 cars off the road.
      "Do you know why I pulled you over?"
      ...
      Can I say no?

  • @zerobyte802
    @zerobyte802 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3410

    Air traffic controllers hate this one simple trick that saves you hours of paperwork.

    • @ArcticProxy
      @ArcticProxy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@thert.hon.thelordnicholson7261 lol

    • @jankeessteenbergen
      @jankeessteenbergen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@thert.hon.thelordnicholson7261 Wait what. Can you explain further?

    • @CODMarioWarfare
      @CODMarioWarfare 4 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      @@jankeessteenbergen It's a parody of clickbait ads

    • @jankeessteenbergen
      @jankeessteenbergen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@CODMarioWarfare lol how did I miss that ty

    • @lDrFuManchul
      @lDrFuManchul 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Hi, my name is Andrew and I have to thank you! With your simple trick I saved 10Bucks worth of paper
      *shows some random banking app on phone with „+120$“*
      I can’t believe that worked!
      *drives off with rental ferrari*

  • @nickv4073
    @nickv4073 4 ปีที่แล้ว +949

    "Endeavor 5578, you are cleared to taxi via Van Wyck Expessway North to Grand Central Pkwy West. Follow the Yellow Cab".

    • @davidcarroll8735
      @davidcarroll8735 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I think this is the best comment, against some tough competition, well done!

    • @armaga144
      @armaga144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      My god, I laughed my ass off just by imagining this

    • @NickyD
      @NickyD ปีที่แล้ว

      ha ha im dead

    • @afridgetoofar1818
      @afridgetoofar1818 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      "Endeavor 5578 has Yankee....stadium."

    • @jjbailey01
      @jjbailey01 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This sounds like something Kennedy Steve would say.

  • @josephdale69
    @josephdale69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3152

    They probably spent a longer time taxiing than the actual flight.

    • @afcgeo882
      @afcgeo882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Joseph Dale Yeah, but it’s a repositioning flight.

    • @noonedude101
      @noonedude101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +201

      We used to do a 9nm flight in a Brasilia from an airport with runway 19/1... 9nm to an airport that was also 19/1.
      We would brief takeoff and landing while we taxied. We'd get a takeoff clearance from the departure airport and then we'll call the other airport and get a landing clearance while we were still on the ground.
      Instead of, "Acceleration v2+20 flaps up", we called, "Acceleration v2+20 landing checks."

    • @DannyBeeVegas
      @DannyBeeVegas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Usually those flights are done later in the evening and it's always interesting when it's the other way around since the flight might be routed out toward Eastern Long Island to enter the landing pattern. Its not uncommon for a flight to be repositioned from/ to the NYC airports, some repositions into EWR heads as far south as PHL to enter the EWR pattern

    • @Plyst3
      @Plyst3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@DannyBeeVegas yep, Ive seen and listened to the atc as they spin around, they tend to head down to Robbinsville, sometimes as far as Philly depending on traffic at Trenton Mercer, or Fort Dix. As well as the numerous small county airports. Always an interesting site on a clear day watching a jet at a relative low altitude turn around.

    • @_extra9126
      @_extra9126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Having left out of JFK numerous times, this is painfully true.

  • @tabel4844
    @tabel4844 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2466

    Pilot 1: "positive rate, gear up."
    Pilot 2: "Nahhh lmao. Just leave er down"

    • @positiverategearup8043
      @positiverategearup8043 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      T Abel hahaha! Before they reach TOC its time for TOD already

    • @joshuabarbosa4824
      @joshuabarbosa4824 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Lol same 😂

    • @VirtuellJo
      @VirtuellJo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      ENVD to ENSS flaps are not retracted.

    • @TheSimulationGamer
      @TheSimulationGamer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Best comment in this video

    • @noonedude101
      @noonedude101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      When I was flying part 135 we regularly made a reposition flight between two airports that were only six miles apart. They also had pretty similar runways. We would get our Landing clearance from the tower at the departure Airport by them calling the tower at the other airport on the phone. I would literally be cleared to land and take off at the same time.
      The running joke was, "Positive rate, gear down, landing checks."

  • @6z0
    @6z0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +668

    “Youre cleared for takeoff”
    45 seconds later
    “Youre cleared for landing”

    • @strohtaler4698
      @strohtaler4698 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Nope: "You're cleared for landing... Wind 270 at 11, runway 22R, cleared for takeoff"

  • @nickluther263
    @nickluther263 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3222

    That awkward moment when a subway train gets you from point A to point B faster then an airplane

    • @uehm
      @uehm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +114

      I don't know man, getting from Queens to BK is pretty shit...but it's only $2.75, so just a tad bit cheaper then flying there ;)

    • @JonathanRockway
      @JonathanRockway 4 ปีที่แล้ว +242

      It's about an hour. It is somewhat difficult to get your plane onto the subway at rush hour, though, so it's easier to just fly it. Lot of weird looks when you and your copilot are just trying to shove it through the door. Everyone has to scramble to move their luggage out of the way. They try to close the door on you. It's a disaster. 0/10 would not recommend.

    • @FeNite8
      @FeNite8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Can’t fit an airplane on a subway

    • @amax1229
      @amax1229 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      It was a reposition flight. Probably no passengers.

    • @jeanpauljh
      @jeanpauljh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      ...except there is no subway linkage between JFK and LGA (never mind that neither airport is served at all by a direct subway)

  • @kylejonas3875
    @kylejonas3875 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1096

    This is straight out of a FSX Steam multiplayer session

    • @jmullentech
      @jmullentech 4 ปีที่แล้ว +179

      I can hear AirforceProud now... "Endeavor 5578, winds 270 @ 11, caution wake turbulence from the departing hot air balloon, RWY 22R, cleared for take off".

    • @smartrubberchicken
      @smartrubberchicken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Can't be. There is no hot air balloon doing 420 knots

    • @RubberDucky087
      @RubberDucky087 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@jmullentech Have you seen the one with the "new controller" who won't clear him into Vegas? I love that one. This is pretty much the same level of confusion.

    • @cheddarmx5969
      @cheddarmx5969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@RubberDucky087 thats the best one

    • @StrokeMahEgo
      @StrokeMahEgo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Endeavor, stand by, space shuttle on final.

  • @DerekHardwick
    @DerekHardwick 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1365

    JFK DEP: Endeavor 5578, what’s your flight level?
    Endeavor 5578: I’m at 3rd & Main...

    • @armyguru1214
      @armyguru1214 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @ryansiebert2168
      @ryansiebert2168 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I laughed harder at this than thr video

    • @fhturner3
      @fhturner3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sat here cackling in my car in parking lot at this one...

    • @fhturner3
      @fhturner3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Calefar Dimani Not cool.

    • @120mmsmoothbore2
      @120mmsmoothbore2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Calefar Dimani I laughed too hard at this

  • @Quasihamster
    @Quasihamster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1777

    Imagine Steve handling this: "I don't know who you are, I don't know where you are. Just go where you want, as long as you make LGA by nightfall they'll be happy."

    • @beyondinsanitybr
      @beyondinsanitybr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      His name is Kennedy Steve. Please correct.

    • @Quasihamster
      @Quasihamster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      @@beyondinsanitybr What if I was talking about Schipol Steve?

    • @beyondinsanitybr
      @beyondinsanitybr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Quasihamster That's a character too!

    • @MADmosche
      @MADmosche 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Scuba Steve?

    • @davidfrench5407
      @davidfrench5407 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      I think everyone knew which Steve he was talking about considering we're talking about a JFK departure.

  • @AverytheCubanAmerican
    @AverytheCubanAmerican 3 ปีที่แล้ว +541

    Pilot: Can we just go VFR?
    ATC: You're flying in one of the busiest airspaces in the world just to go to LaGuardia, no you can-
    Pilot: *WE'LL DO IT LIVE!*

    • @mynickels
      @mynickels 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      What a reference!

    • @afridgetoofar1818
      @afridgetoofar1818 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      First Officer O'Reilly

    • @NoNameAtAll2
      @NoNameAtAll2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mynickels reference to what?

    • @BlueBearJr
      @BlueBearJr ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@NoNameAtAll2 look up “Bill O’Reilly We’ll do it live”

    • @jetx_47
      @jetx_47 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Didn't think I'd see you here

  • @aquaz_eu
    @aquaz_eu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1659

    If I'd have a billion dollars I'd setup a flight company that would just fly some weird connections just to confuse the controllers.

  • @freednighthawk
    @freednighthawk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +573

    "This is your captain speaking,
    Today's flight will be approximately 5 minutes, with a cruising altitude of 3,500 feet. Meal service will be whatever you bought at the terminal, and don't expect any drinks..."

    • @RobinHood70
      @RobinHood70 4 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      I actually had a captain say something similar to that a long time ago. It was a 6-minute flight from Campbell River to Comox, I believe, and he came on the mic saying something like "Our expected flight time today is six minutes, and our cruising altitude is...well...we won't actually have one because we're taking off and then we're landing. Heck, we're not even going to break cloud cover!" I don't remember what else he said, but it was a hilarious few minutes, at any rate.

    • @ReinSouls
      @ReinSouls 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @@RobinHood70
      I've had something similar happen. I was flying from my local airport to Chicago, but my flight got canceled (forget why this was 10 years ago), so they rerouted us to their nearby hub airport for a connector to Chicago which was like a 30min flight from my home airport. Pilot came on and said "we know none of you are actually doing this flight to Washington to go to Washington, so I hope you all make your connectors and have a great trip to where you're going!" That drew a nice laugh from everyone.

    • @lurkingknight
      @lurkingknight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@RobinHood70 shortest flight I ever took was vancouver to victoria... it's not even a hop. yvr -> yyj

    • @anbooba
      @anbooba 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I used to fly regularly with United from Washington Dullas to Johnstown PA, the flight stops in Altoona, so Altoona to Johnstown is a max of 9 minutes but many time it was 7 minutes, no drinks. No announcement and no passengers sometime :) ( Fleecing of America, it is government subsidized) oh they did retract the wheels.

    • @loonylovesgood
      @loonylovesgood 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao, this comment made me spit water. Thumbs up for you.

  • @CAPFlyer
    @CAPFlyer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1293

    There's actually an even shorter repo that occurs occasionally - DFW - DAL or vice versa. Usually, its a corporate aircraft doing the move, but when the conditions are right, they literally take off on runway 13L at DFW and land 13L or 32R at DAL - a total flight time of 3 minutes in a jet. Most crews don't even pull up the gear or flaps. It's takeoff, approach checklist, configure for landing, landing checklist, land. They definitely spend more time taxiing than flying.

    • @malcolmy11
      @malcolmy11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      That's super fun, all flying no cruise. At least in FSX.

    • @skapskippy
      @skapskippy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      I've done even shorter doing a repo from ADS to DAL. Also talked to a flexjet pilot who did it once and as soon as he took off from ADS on 15 the Addison controller cleared him to land at DAL 13L.

    • @stemhead
      @stemhead 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      I repo DFW-ADS or DAL-ADS often enough. I do get the gear up for a few seconds though.

    • @tjsynkral
      @tjsynkral 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      My Flight Sim ops were often between CGX, ORD, and MDW

    • @milaandahiya
      @milaandahiya 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've seen flights from RBD-DAL as well

  • @nightrider9060
    @nightrider9060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +274

    I love it . A pilot who knows the regs . Dont waste my time , I am requesting VFR .👍🤝

    • @kylenakamura4353
      @kylenakamura4353 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Could a regular airliner (737, 747, A380, etc) fly VFR? Or is it specifically allowed in this case because the Endeavor is a relatively small plane?

    • @kaheab8880
      @kaheab8880 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Kyle Nakamura VFR has higher weather minimums. Most airline route lengths would make it inefficient to fly and dodge IMC. Airlines also fly in class A airspace which requires an IFR flight plan so unless they’re flying below the class A they’ll need an IFR flight plan anyways.

    • @kaheab8880
      @kaheab8880 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Kyle Nakamura theoretically if you had the money to rent one of those planes and also had all the applicable type ratings or endorsements, then yeah you could fly VFR in them. Most pilots get their instrument rating before their multi rating though, so it’s not as big of a factor. It’s more about the $$$ lol

    • @chrislequang3924
      @chrislequang3924 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@kylenakamura4353 I believe that if you have passengers as an airline, you have to fly IFR. Here, it's was just repositioning, so no passengers. Hence, they were able to fly VFR.

    • @dufonrafal
      @dufonrafal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@kylenakamura4353 it's allowed because it's a repo flight = no passengers

  • @TheGreatBillyMays
    @TheGreatBillyMays 4 ปีที่แล้ว +862

    EDV5578: Can we just go VFR to LGA?
    Every other pilot: NOOOOOO!

    • @petervaicels8578
      @petervaicels8578 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      What's VFR?

    • @gobarn1877
      @gobarn1877 4 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      @@petervaicels8578 it means visual flight rules and generally big planes fly ifr (instrument flight rules) not vfr. Essentially it just means you need to be able to maintain certain visual minimums. Basically not flying in clouds.

    • @goldosprey
      @goldosprey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      @@gobarn1877 Which going from JFK to LGA if its clear there its gonna be clear at LGA. However this is not the easiest airport for VFR cause of where some of the runways are

    • @Taurineg
      @Taurineg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Well if they stand under 18,000 they can

    • @BobbyGeneric145
      @BobbyGeneric145 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thats why we don't have a flow.

  • @jpzv_old
    @jpzv_old 4 ปีที่แล้ว +285

    ATC: are you in VFR?
    5578: Yep
    ATC: Okeeeey... Seems legit

  • @Mojoissimo
    @Mojoissimo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +136

    I flew into and out of JFK in a tiny little plane VFR (Piper Arrow). All the local pilots told me it wasn't allowed, but JFK operates under the same rules as everyone else, so I thought it was worth a try! JFK weren't surprised at all - they really liked it, and apologised that they had to charge me a landing fee ($15).
    Presumably their surprise in this case is due to the aircraft being operated by an airline, but VFR was a smart move in this situation! If I have no flightplan filed, I usually ensure it's not going to be too busy with planned arrivals at the airport, and just suffix the word 'VFR' to my initial call-up at bigger airports (London Gatwick, Orlando International etc) to save them hunting for my flightplan/strip.

    • @ParadigmUnkn0wn
      @ParadigmUnkn0wn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      I guess this was a long time ago. You can certainly land at JFK, but the fees (as of today) are:
      Landing - minimum fee: $50
      Landing - additional fee between 3PM - 10PM: $100
      Departure: $6.95 per 1,000lbs
      Departure minimum fee: $25
      Departure - additional fee between 3PM - 10PM: $100
      Parking (up to 8 hours): $45
      You're looking at $120 minimum just to the NYC Port Authority, or $320 if you're not an early bird. This is before and handling fees from the FBO, and there is only one FBO, Sheltair. Sheltair's handling fees for a small single engine piston plane start at $50, although if you pump enough of their $9/gallon fuel they might waive that for you.
      Technically any certificated aircraft can land at any public use airport, which does include JFK, LaGuardia, O'Hare, Atlanta, etc. They control GA traffic by making it prohibitively expensive to land there just for fun.
      Teterboro is the go-to for private planes. It's still not cheap, and your Piper may look a little out of place next to a Boeing Business Jet or a Gulfstream, but it's better than JFK/LGA.

    • @Mojoissimo
      @Mojoissimo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      It was during Storm Sandy (made the landing a little interesting!), and I purposely chose the dead of night, to avoid stressing a busy system.
      They knew then that the fees were going to be artificially raised in the near future, and were very unhappy about it - for some reason they loved having such a small (and boring!) plane fly in, thought it was a great laugh, and were very encouraging!
      One of the best things about large US airports is their delight in mixing small/slow aircraft between airliners safely without disruption - they seem to regard it as a mark of being an excellent air traffic controller, rather than as a chore/annoyance!

    • @afridgetoofar1818
      @afridgetoofar1818 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Mojoissimo We used to own a Piper Arrow 200. Solid-ass airplane!

    • @ptrinch
      @ptrinch ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Piper November 3454 Lima Follow the British Airways 747 and line up and wait on runway 31L. Caution wake turbulence.

    • @skippynj1979
      @skippynj1979 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My old airline we could do vfr but it was removed from our manual. We used to do LGA and jfk to PHL vfr a bit.

  • @davemould4638
    @davemould4638 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I recall at a regional French airport I was flying a C310 back to UK. There were about 10 pilots, all in smart uniforms, mainly flying small corporate jets filing flight plans at the desk. They were all looking pretty glum - apparently there was a 90 minute + delay for departure. In due course I (in jeans and a T-shirt) handed across my flight plan and was told I could go to the aircraft immediately, no delay. I heard one of the pilots ask why I had no delay while they all had to wait well over an hour. "Because he is VFR" was the reply. Soon I was surrounded by 10 pilots all asking if they could copy my VFR departure route (it was a published route requiring flying a heading to a river, then along the river to a landmark, then to another landmark before clearing the ATZ).

    • @charleskennedy1712
      @charleskennedy1712 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I was flying a C-172 London to Khartoum last year and had to go to the briefing room in Athens to manually file my flight plan. Because I’d been in the plane ready to start up for the flight to Crete, I was in my life jacket. Was so funny walking past many Aegean Airlines crews all wearing sunglasses indoors etc. They definitely noticed. Wearing a life jacket in front of a load of airline pilots is a good flex

  • @------country-boy-------
    @------country-boy------- 4 ปีที่แล้ว +747

    that awkward moment when the FAA lets planes fly around New York without paperwork.

    • @mog882
      @mog882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      country boy I do it all the time in the SFRA, look it up it’s a cool VFR workaround of sorts.

    • @Dillon1108
      @Dillon1108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Yeah I would expect 9/11 memories would cause all sorts of paranoia in that area

    • @Ixions
      @Ixions 4 ปีที่แล้ว +120

      Airlines don't let planes fly with more fuel than they need so I imagine this guy was running on wound up rubber bands.

    • @efari
      @efari 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Ixions well. downtown NYC is closer than LGA tho, so what's your point?

    • @Ixions
      @Ixions 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      @@efari Well the first point is for the chuckles. Secondly, the guy flying VFR port to port LGA is less of a threat than the guy with paperwork flying LAX with a full tank of gas.
      Remember, if you want to fuck with someone visiting NYC point out that terrorists prefer a full tank of gas and show them videos of rats swimming up sewer pipes into toilets.

  • @drabberjewel7108
    @drabberjewel7108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +468

    When your flight sim flight is real life.

    • @philipmcniel4908
      @philipmcniel4908 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah, I watched specifically because this is the sort of thing I'd do on VATSIM :)

    • @jmullentech
      @jmullentech 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@philipmcniel4908 lmao I literally had that exact thought

    • @DorianTMChannel
      @DorianTMChannel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      On FSX offline I always accidentally hit the cancel ifr button on the atc window and I am like "NOOOOO" I refuse to do VFR in a 737.

    • @noah9130
      @noah9130 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      DorianTM Why don't you use vatsim ?

    • @DorianTMChannel
      @DorianTMChannel 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@noah9130 not experienced enough

  • @1bottlejackdaniels
    @1bottlejackdaniels 4 ปีที่แล้ว +206

    Teterboro = "what's going on there?!"

  • @davidmangold1838
    @davidmangold1838 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I was flying a re-positioning flight 24 years ago, Jfk-lga in a 727-200. It was straight out and straight in, at 0700 am. Off to on was 7 minutes. I told engineer and copilot, “we’ll raise the landing gear, keep the slats and flaps out, and don’t flip any switches on the f/e panel”. Took off, did after takeoff checklist then before landing checklist, and landed. When at the gate in lga, the engineer and copilots’ brains were still at JFK😳. It was a fun flight, for sure👍🏻

    • @h8GW
      @h8GW ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd like to become a pilot, and thinking about it, I realized only retracting the gear makes sense as it's solely detrimental to safe flight when in the air.

  • @MusabJilani
    @MusabJilani 4 ปีที่แล้ว +413

    This is hilarious! Minor subtitle correction:
    1:51 is "it looks like they're actually gonna let you do this"

    • @JJM2222
      @JJM2222 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Comment correction:
      "This is hilarious!"

    • @patchoulicolt7093
      @patchoulicolt7093 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! I didn't catch it.

    • @MusabJilani
      @MusabJilani 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Jaime Mierow Haha thanks, damn autocorrect

    • @thedoctorroth
      @thedoctorroth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MusabJilani damn it. You edited your comment and i spent 5 minutes trying to figure out where it was wrong lol

  • @decline2state
    @decline2state 4 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    If only Kennedy Steve had been the one to deal with this.

    • @joshuam20
      @joshuam20 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      decline2state Oh fuck yeah that would’ve been hilarious.

    • @Trek001
      @Trek001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@joshuam20
      "5578, roger... Taxi via Bravo and hold short of November - give way to the school bus carrying children on the way back from the museum on your left. Once clear, proceed down the road and give way to traffic. Actually, can you pick up the LGA tower a round of starbucks as you pass down 3rd?"
      "Affirm"

    • @mickemike2148
      @mickemike2148 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Trek001 Ha!

  • @sarahrichards1281
    @sarahrichards1281 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I love how the controller just short circuits at the idea of an airliner just flying VFR to a neighboring airport, like it was a GA flight.

  • @canofanger
    @canofanger 4 ปีที่แล้ว +316

    Usually a repositioning flight under VFR would be done with the aircraft registration, not an airline callsign. Could be one of the reasons for the confusion.

    • @scottycatman
      @scottycatman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Yeah this is the second time I've watched this and just thought about this. I think he could go by callsign if he made a VFR flight plan, but we know he didn't.

    • @ellenorbjornsdottir1166
      @ellenorbjornsdottir1166 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I'd've said "Endeavor N123AB"

    • @benjammin2020
      @benjammin2020 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Yeah, but the pilot was probably still in the mindset, since he did file a flight plan.

    • @N1120A
      @N1120A 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      You can use a callsign on a VFR flight plan.

    • @ellenorbjornsdottir1166
      @ellenorbjornsdottir1166 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@N1120A Does it need to be a company callsign or is "Harambé 5" legal?

  • @nutsbutdum
    @nutsbutdum 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Pilot: Gear up!
    Computer: Minimum!

  • @slick9892
    @slick9892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    About 40 years ago, I once really confused a controller, by asking to fly from one side of CLE to the other. It was a very long taxi, and the taxiway used to be a runway, so we thought why drive there when we can fly? The controller had nothing going on at the time, and reluctantly approved it. Flight time 1 minute, at 50’ agl.

    • @dufonrafal
      @dufonrafal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      love it

    • @trut52
      @trut52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're a cool dude

    • @jamessanders145
      @jamessanders145 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I would have loved to see that.

    • @h8GW
      @h8GW ปีที่แล้ว

      Your landing and takeoff rolls must've been very short.

  • @Cissy2cute
    @Cissy2cute 4 ปีที่แล้ว +324

    Maybe they should have just driven the plane there via Grand Central Parkway. 😄

    • @henryweber393
      @henryweber393 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Jacky Robertson pkwy is faster😂😂

    • @Cissy2cute
      @Cissy2cute 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@henryweber393 Haven't been out that way for a while. LOL

    • @AMStationEngineer
      @AMStationEngineer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yeah, but make that 'second exit mistake', and wind up on the Van Wyck headed for the Midtown Tunnel....

    • @drmayeda1930
      @drmayeda1930 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cops wouldn't like the idea of a plane on the street. The wingspan us too big and would take out anything it hits, signs, traffic signals utility poles.

    • @ultfrisbeeplyr
      @ultfrisbeeplyr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      What about the Van Wyck?
      They say no one's
      ever beaten the Van Wyck

  • @anthonyvallillo422
    @anthonyvallillo422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    This sort of thing was once more common - back in the 70’s and even in the early 2000’s at AA we had them weekly. The actual flight took around 20-30 minutes off to on, but I once flew a 727 from LGA to JFK in under 4 minutes. Took off on 22 and landed 13L at JFK. Maybe a record in a transport category airplane. Takeoffs on 22 at LGA required Chief Pilot approval back then at AA due to noise over Queens.

  • @SupremeLeaderKimJong-un
    @SupremeLeaderKimJong-un 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    It's much easier when you only have one airport to operate in your city

    • @bend1119
      @bend1119 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      looser

  • @jr13227
    @jr13227 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I love that I just heard an airliner get cleared into class bravo airspace

    • @DaveDepilot-KFRG
      @DaveDepilot-KFRG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It would have been better if he was told "Stay clear of the Bravo". LOL

  • @metropod
    @metropod 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Heading... left onto the access road, right onto Lefferts Blvd, left onto Queens Blvd, right onto Junction Blvd and maintain to LGA.

  • @stanman4598
    @stanman4598 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I’ve flown this same type of repo flight in an MD88. Lots of fun and quick in VFR conditions filed IFR. No pax. Great city tour!

    • @sludge4125
      @sludge4125 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Angry Puppy.

  • @AndyMoserCH
    @AndyMoserCH 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    lessons learned: if no flight plan is filed, just vfr around 🤪

  • @aaronharvey6992
    @aaronharvey6992 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I used to dispatch a Kalitta Air B747 KEWR - KJFK nearly every day in the early 2000s.

  • @Justin.Franks
    @Justin.Franks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    3:30 That would have been a weird experience for anyone out on the northern end of Sandy Hook, NJ. Small GA aircraft are commonly seen there at low altitude, but definitely not any airliners.

  • @theguy0000
    @theguy0000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    I bet flying an airliner vfr is a rare bit of fun

    • @americanswan
      @americanswan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Notice how they vectored the plane like it was IFR. If the flight was longer they could have flown around a bit for fun before landing. LOL

    • @jaybrooks1098
      @jaybrooks1098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Vfr for a large airframe in jfk LaGuardia must be just so insane it just doesn’t happen.

    • @RainbowManification
      @RainbowManification 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@americanswan In class bravo you follow vectors from ATC

    • @jonashelmke2564
      @jonashelmke2564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jaybrooks1098 A CRJ-200 is very hardly a "large airframe" though.

    • @tyga3966
      @tyga3966 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      ​@@americanswan You'll always be vectored in Class Bravo whether VFR or IFR unless they tell you to follow a VFR transition. This was essentially IFR but without the paperwork

  • @Dan007UT
    @Dan007UT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +185

    "Tower- I can identify has a Cessna 182 if that will make this VFR trip easier for you to comprehend"

    • @acfixerdude
      @acfixerdude 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Don't assume my make & model!

    • @CODMarioWarfare
      @CODMarioWarfare 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      one joke

    • @nightrider9060
      @nightrider9060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A Cessna 182 out of JFK ?

    • @vividthespis
      @vividthespis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I laughed harder at this than I should have. Nice one.

    • @Shit_I_Missed.
      @Shit_I_Missed. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Biggest damn Cessna I've ever seen!

  • @Elgatovolar
    @Elgatovolar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    “Endeavor 5578, Keep Clear of the KLGA Class D Airspace”
    Uh Oh!

    • @N1120A
      @N1120A 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      LGA is class B

  • @sionehefa3458
    @sionehefa3458 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Thank you all for the explanation of a Repo Flight. First time I have heard of this. I was thinking maybe it was a repossessed plane like a repo man just gets in and gets the hell out of there :) No IFR Flight Plan ok I'll go VFR!

    • @uruiamnot
      @uruiamnot 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah... It's a good thing that the keys to the airplane are kept locked in a safe. Otherwise, repo guys would take them and fly them to the repo yard!

    • @toldt
      @toldt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can't believe what you see on TV. That's not how repossessions work for aircraft.

  • @TheRailfanningBirdwatcher
    @TheRailfanningBirdwatcher 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've seen LGA-JFK or JFK-LGA flights sometimes, and yes just for repositioning for other flights. I remember I was so confused when I saw a LGA to JFK flight for the first time :)

  • @barrel6468
    @barrel6468 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    “Positive rate, flaps 30 degrees.”

  • @jeffstewart7639
    @jeffstewart7639 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When I was in the Navy, I took a flight that went from Norfolk with a stop at Newport News Airport.

    • @TheRaggiesoft
      @TheRaggiesoft 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      (I live in Norfolk now) that was what? 1 minute from ORF to PHF? 🤣

  • @falcon759
    @falcon759 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    1:48 She said, "It looks like they're going to actually LET YOU do this"

  • @chesleyhu624
    @chesleyhu624 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    They clearly forgot that readback "chear into class B"

  • @DannyBeeVegas
    @DannyBeeVegas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Usually those flights are done later in the evening and it's always interesting when it's the other way around since the flight might be routed out toward Eastern Long Island to enter the landing pattern. Its not uncommon for a flight to be repositioned from/ to the NYC airports, some repositions into EWR heads as far south as PHL. These repositions can take up to an hour if they have to enter the pattern far away (50-80 miles or more).
    You might even see HPN to JFK or vice versa with JetBlue flights.

  • @NightingaleSunset
    @NightingaleSunset 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My dad was one of 8 people on a 747 20 years ago that flew from Oakland to San Francisco. Said it was one of the *best* commercial flights of his life

    • @jdanon203
      @jdanon203 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      On Full House Stephanie and Michelle once thought they were going from San Francisco to Oakland, but were really going to Auckland.

    • @SodaAnt7
      @SodaAnt7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was once on a flight from Oakland to San Jose.

  • @ceciliadelgadillo7922
    @ceciliadelgadillo7922 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I live about 9 miles from LGA right under the approach for runway 22. TBH I was really confused the first time I saw a plane flying at 2k feet only to see it was flying to JFK

  • @MrEbug68
    @MrEbug68 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Back in the 90s when I worked at United they had a LAX To San Diego flight that was a 757 that was a scheduled reposition flight and it always had like 15 people on it.

    • @kewkabe
      @kewkabe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There was also a regular ONT-LAX flight but I forgot the airline.

    • @MrEbug68
      @MrEbug68 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      kewkabe I know Skywest flew that route and i took that flight once when I was coming home to Fresno.

  • @nannite
    @nannite 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The weirdest flight Ive seen so far (on my flight radar app) is Oakland to SJC, which are 40 miles apart. It was a fedex flight. But its flight path looked similar to this one (3 sided square), it first had to go straight west before turning south.

  • @synclpz
    @synclpz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This makes me smile even while repeated watching through several months

  • @ThisGuyDoesntExist
    @ThisGuyDoesntExist 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Welcome to Steam Edition

  • @GabrielCox
    @GabrielCox 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Another caveat to why this is unusual (but ok): Normally, all jet and turboprop aircraft fly above 18,000 ft, which is class A airspace and is IFR only (and must be flown under IFR flight plan). However, since this plane is basically going across town, 3000ft is about right for that to immediately setup for a visual approach into LGA. As others have said/joked, it barely (and possibly not) even make sense to raise the landing gear. So, on a clear day, why not VFR? They're still under radar service traffic separation in class B. They're just not used to seeing scheduled carriers (or probably other aircraft for that matter) flying VFR out of JFK. A smaller class C/D airport gets much more mixed (IFR/VFR) traffic.

  • @Mostlyharmless1985
    @Mostlyharmless1985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    If it's stupid and it works... I just love the lightbulb moment as she was taxiing them "Can we just, you know, go there?"

  • @vancouver4sure
    @vancouver4sure 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awesome pilot... gets some nonsense and throws out the hail Mary plan! Brilliant!!

  • @RippyLol
    @RippyLol ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I used to think of such a short flight when I was small

  • @dwarftoad
    @dwarftoad 4 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    would have been easier to just taxi up the van wyck

    • @gac4885
      @gac4885 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      or just shove all the passengers into a bus from LGA to JFK

    • @DylanHK
      @DylanHK 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      GAC not a passenger flight, it’s for repo

    • @JulieanGalak
      @JulieanGalak 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Van Wyck is never easier than anything.

    • @jdanon203
      @jdanon203 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They say no one's ever beaten the Van Wyck.

  • @anthonyblacker8471
    @anthonyblacker8471 4 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Controller: Are you guys VFR?????????
    Pilot: Is it really THAT hard to understand???????

    • @boringperson-zb8vy
      @boringperson-zb8vy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      I think it's more disbelief than misinterpretation

    • @s2sultania
      @s2sultania 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What is vfr?

    • @michaelslee4336
      @michaelslee4336 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Shubham Sultania
      VFR Visual flight rules. Being able to fly a plane by seeing the outside world versus IFR instrument flight rules, fly a plane in the dark for example by using cockpit instruments.

    • @chester8420
      @chester8420 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@s2sultania VFR is an abbreviation that stands for "visual flight rules". It is one of the 2 forms of navigation used by aircraft. The other is IFR or "instrument flight rules".
      During IFR flight, navigation of the aircraft and separation from other planes are directed by people on the ground using radar and other devices. Pitch, roll, yaw, altitude, and direction control may be performed using only the aircraft's onboard instruments. (Hence "instrument" flight rules) The pilot is usually "vectored" along a pre determined path.
      During VFR flight, the aircrafts navigation is at pilots discretion,(within a set of rules) and physical separation between other aircraft is the pilots duty using see-and-avoid out the window. There are exceptions, such as entering controlled airspace around a busy airport. That requires prior permission, (even for VFR pilots) and pilots are required to follow that controller's directions while in controlled airspace.
      Most larger aircraft fly faster and or higher than would be safe or legal under VFR rules. Also airlines may have policies that require all flights with passengers fly IFR even if it is a pretty day. Another huge consideration is the sequencing of aircraft into and out of busy airports. If a bunch of VFR airliners arrived unexpectedly all at once, the local controllers would be overwhelmed, so they sequence them.
      There are times when VFR flight is illegal. Flight above 18,000ft is restricted to IFR under most circumstances. Other conditions such as foggy weather, or flying into clouds, or flying in any situation that obscures your view are illegal because the pilot has to maintain visual separation with other aircraft, and cell phone antennas etc using "see and avoid".
      It was atypical for the airline pilot in this flight to be VFR. That was the source of the controllers' confusion.

    • @piotrkuler2474
      @piotrkuler2474 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That could be confusing

  • @saxmanb777
    @saxmanb777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm waiting for when I can repo from SEA to BFI. My company likes to do that a lot.

  • @philipwhiuk
    @philipwhiuk หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gotta nail that landing - if you do a go-around you're doubling the flight time!

  • @jakejacobs7584
    @jakejacobs7584 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It actually used to be quite common. I was flying for Commuter Airlines, not making the name up, and during the PATCO strike in 1981. We did that all the time, in fact New York Air used to fly between NY and Boston and Washington VFR low level when able. These controllers probably weren't even born then tho.

  • @djcatron11
    @djcatron11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The closet thing I've experienced was from Anchorage to Fairbanks Alaska. About a 40 minute flight. They climb and once the plane reaches cruising altitude they immediately start their decent.

    • @lucadreier22
      @lucadreier22 ปีที่แล้ว

      Flying ZRH to AMS sure does feel that way as well.

  • @Jetmech145
    @Jetmech145 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think she had a stroke when he asked for the vfr!🤣

  • @o0julek0o
    @o0julek0o 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I did this irl, but with uber eats instead of a plane. We lived across the street from a KFC. I mean IN FRONT OF OUR APARTMENT BUILDING. But we got some crazy discount from uber eats for KFC, so we ordered. The walk from inside of the KFC was about the same as to the carpark where the uber had his moped. It took 25 minutes to arrive because the poor fella was so confused.

  • @WendyKS93
    @WendyKS93 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    LMAO!!!!! For some reason I'm finding this hilarious.

  • @crooked-halo
    @crooked-halo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Surprising...Many companies won’t allow VFR flight, at least where there’s ATC.

    • @Tmeek2
      @Tmeek2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Since they were just repositioning the plane without passengers it’s probably allowed

    • @prorobo
      @prorobo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most companies allow it so we can cancel IFR late at night going into uncontrolled fields.

  • @charlestonyank2067
    @charlestonyank2067 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Strange things always happen in the NYC airports. I flew to Charlotte from JFK one morning as the only passenger. Seems that fog the night before caused two aircraft to JFK instead of one of them to LGA. So they need both in Charlotte, so I flew by myself in the cabin. The other passenger flew on the other plane.

  • @Alanc419
    @Alanc419 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Prior to 9/11 there were VFR revenue flights as well. On regional routes, Allegheny, Piedmont, Eagle and Atlantic Coast Airlines would cancel IFR if the weather was VFR from time to time.

  • @kblueleaf
    @kblueleaf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There are some familiar flights in Taiwan
    They flight from Taoyuan Airport to Songshan Airport
    The distance between these two airports is only 35km(about 22miles)
    And the flights are [routine flights]

  • @DeltaFoxtrotWhiskey3
    @DeltaFoxtrotWhiskey3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Seems like it would have caused less confusion and been less hassle to load the plane onto a truck a drive it across town :P

    • @shantanu925
      @shantanu925 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Have you seen the roads of new York ? 😂

    • @DeltaFoxtrotWhiskey3
      @DeltaFoxtrotWhiskey3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes I have. I go up there often. I stand by my statement hahaha

  • @SpiraSpiraSpira
    @SpiraSpiraSpira 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always had to ferry aircraft from Addison to Dallas-Fort Worth and it was similar, if even closer.

  • @piotrkuler2474
    @piotrkuler2474 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I can't imagine this in European operations .
    Actually i'm sure that many airlines forbid vfr in their OMA ...

  • @niekbeentjes8849
    @niekbeentjes8849 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    JFK ATC advising to refile the flightplan XD It's a 5 min flight!

    • @josh_jc_cheng
      @josh_jc_cheng 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      He would have landed with VFR before he gets his IFR clearance LMFAO

  • @jackp2323
    @jackp2323 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The most fun flight I ever had was from Myrtle Beach, SC to Wilmington, NC. Their flight from Charlotte, NC was cancelled to MYR. We had enough room on our plane from CLT to ILM so we took the passengers to MYR first. We dropped them off and then went onto ILM...probably 60 miles as the crow flies. I'm not very aeronautical but our altitude was very low and you could really tell our speed over ground. I knew all the landmarks we were passing and as soon as we were up, we were coming back down.

  • @garethtan7053
    @garethtan7053 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You know you flight is confusing when the supervisor comes over to make sure it really exists

  • @AADFWspotters2
    @AADFWspotters2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Haha, she was like "say again" this airliner wants to go VFR? I wish more flights would be VFR, would save a lot of headache....

    • @josephdale69
      @josephdale69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AADFWspotters They would still need some sort of clearance because they would be in class B the entire time. And in constant radio contact because of the large number of departures and arrivals between the 2 airports.

    • @josephdale69
      @josephdale69 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      But I do know what you mean.

    • @afcgeo882
      @afcgeo882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      VFR in a Cessna is easy. VFR in a jet, over NYC is dangerous.

    • @AADFWspotters2
      @AADFWspotters2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@afcgeo882 dangerous is a bit of an overstatement.

    • @afcgeo882
      @afcgeo882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      AADFWspotters2 Oh? So we’ll just dismiss fairly regular fatal accidents that happen here with VFR fliers? The helo and GA traffic take up the lower altitudes, with the hudson corridor being uncontrolled. They fly at low speeds. The multiple airport approaches and departures slot just above that. Above them are numerous northeast corridor flights that are plowing non-stop. Then we add restricted air space and a plethora of high rise buildings. At 200mph+ this all becomes obstacles to aviation. There’s a very good reason why no one flies VFR out of LGA or JFK. Even Cessnas do IFR here.

  • @k1mgy
    @k1mgy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    "I don't think we've ever seen this".
    Not a confidence-inspiring comment related to a simple VFR flight, is it?

    • @thegardenofeatin5965
      @thegardenofeatin5965 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Well, it's JFK and LaGuardia.

    • @GregoryVeizades
      @GregoryVeizades 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      It's the fact it's a big jet flying VFR in Manhatten airspace. Probably pretty rare.

    • @lolbots
      @lolbots 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah pretty stupid

    • @jonashelmke2564
      @jonashelmke2564 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GregoryVeizades Not a big jet. A jet, yeah, not a big one. One of the smallest actually.

  • @thomasaltruda1243
    @thomasaltruda1243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve gone VFR to LGA in a Cessna Caravan. I attempted IFR, but the expected wheels up time was over an hour.. so I just went VFR.

  • @techmonster2632
    @techmonster2632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kennedy steve : how dare you 😤

  • @SGTSnakeUSMC
    @SGTSnakeUSMC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Just tell them you are a Cessna 182, we do VFR all the time.

  • @jaymiluvsyou
    @jaymiluvsyou 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    The funnier part is knowing exactly what pilots those were cuz you’ve worked with them before and knowing how hard they were laughing off the radio at how crazy the whole thing is.

    • @dstblj5222
      @dstblj5222 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      2 things, did they have to carpet dance after this and is it Endeavor put out a memo over this incident?

    • @JJay512
      @JJay512 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dstblj5222 what incident? It’s just a VFR departure out of JFK. 🤷‍♂️

    • @dstblj5222
      @dstblj5222 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JJay512 endeavor put out a memo regarding an incident of unprofessional flight deck conduct shortly after that time

  • @JonathanSchwab2002
    @JonathanSchwab2002 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks. This is an interesting special exception in the JFK, LGA airspace. Seems funny that VFR is not allowed very often!!

    • @fanta12345
      @fanta12345 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are dozens of VFR flights there every day. Just not by airliners.

  • @toldt
    @toldt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5578: We'd like to fly the Hudson River Corridor while we're VFR.
    Approach: Ugh, OK I guess. Descend VFR, passing through one thousand three hundred, frequency change approved. Contact approach on 127.95 at the George Washington Bridge for LGA.

  • @kcook8119
    @kcook8119 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Can we just fly VFR" yea sure why not, screw wasting time on a flight plan

  • @briancooney9952
    @briancooney9952 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "We'd take taxiway Charlie, but it's a couple miles short" would've been a good one

  • @FrancoCastro
    @FrancoCastro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I flew once from Addison Airport to love field. So far the shortest fly in my belt

  • @gusbailey68
    @gusbailey68 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    bravo to all

  • @BobbyGeneric145
    @BobbyGeneric145 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    No way in hell I would do this! I've done this repo flight in the 900 many times and it is chaos the whole way.

    • @scottbutterworth2887
      @scottbutterworth2887 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      thefactorypilot145 Why? It is still in a radar environment. You are still being vectored. The only difference is VFR altitude and cloud clearances. If it was a nice VFR day, then why not? Everyone knew they were coming...

    • @narendranbhaskar
      @narendranbhaskar 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought cloud clearances were to do with instrument rating of the pilot and not the type of flight. Can you fly "VFR" into a cloud and ask for flight following ?

    • @scottbutterworth2887
      @scottbutterworth2887 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@narendranbhaskar Absolutely not! VFR has nothing to do with pilot rating except that only a pilot with an instrument rating can file an IFR flight plan.

    • @scottbutterworth2887
      @scottbutterworth2887 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@narendranbhaskar Flight following is only a VFR clearance. You are still responsible for cloud clearances while getting flight following. This flight was being radar vectored in a radar environment on a VFR flight plan. They were not receiving flight following in a non-radar environment.

    • @essel23fly
      @essel23fly 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Scott Butterworth why? Because nobody knows what you’re doing in a very busy airspace. I did a repo once between two busy airports close to each other like this under VFR and it was a disaster. I wasn’t the CA tho. Never doing that again. Always file IFR because chances are all the controllers will not be on the same page as far as your flight number and you’ll get a lot of confused controllers. Last thing you want is confused controllers in a busy airspace with southwest planes and Cessnas trying to run into you.

  • @iflycentral
    @iflycentral 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    VFR... LIKE A BOSS! :P Must have been quite the shock for ATC.

  • @WhoDeyNati513
    @WhoDeyNati513 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Endeavor is a Delta subsidiary, one of those Delta Connection carriers. Delta has hubs in JFK and LGA. It’s very common that this would happen, especially if there was a diversion to JFK due to the curfew in LGA. LGA uses regional aircraft for its short haul flights around the Northeast and Canada.

  • @Lukania
    @Lukania 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For errata, she said "[...] it looks like they're gonna actually let you do this".

  • @UAL1kFlyer
    @UAL1kFlyer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Could flying an airliner VFR like that violate their OpsSpecs and result in trouble for the pilots with their company or chief pilot? It doesn’t seem illegal or unsafe - just unusual for an air carrier even if they are doing this flight Part 91.

    • @llaughridge
      @llaughridge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If their General Ops Manual allows it, it's fine. If not, they would know not to do it.

    • @coldaxle
      @coldaxle 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@llaughridge SHOULD not WOULD lol

  • @PHX787
    @PHX787 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    It’s like a FSX flight 🤣

  • @wolf2351
    @wolf2351 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I flew from newark to jfk back in 1984.

  • @FallHuntsman
    @FallHuntsman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Probably the only flight where you wouldn’t bother to retract the gear.

  • @jaimeblancopinto8130
    @jaimeblancopinto8130 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    VFR as in Visual Flight Rules? What do you mean??? *scratches head*

    • @amax1229
      @amax1229 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It means they can fly to their destination without a flight plan.
      P.S. If you are mimicking ATC and not asking a question -- good one.

  • @thawekpl
    @thawekpl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    With all the honesty to US ATC, are their systems garbage or what?
    Flight Plan disappeared even with PDC, GND ATC told them they have to coordinate but it seemed that Departure had no clue what's going on, they've been asked 3 times is it really VFR, they already acknowledged you...
    I don't blame the people, I understand they might not believe what they see, I don't know how is it done backstage in US (I'm more familiar with European ATFM), but it quite often on vids here seems they have poor interchanging the messages. Maybe it's because of the rush, or systems limitations. Would be nice to hear from somebody who actually knows how it goes.

    • @kewkabe
      @kewkabe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No, US systems are not "garbage." I'm a current controller and worked in automation briefly so my guess is the airline filed an (IFR) flight plan which goes to the overlying center (and the system that handles PDC's), which then forwards it to the appropriate tower. Since it was completely within the same TRACON though, it's handled differently (internal flight data, not through the center's computers). That's why they were given the 0332 code (internal TRACON codes, not part of the national system). Ground and local would have been coordinating with their flight data, not departure control regarding putting in a local flight plan and getting a code. Also the pilot was confused because they had filed an IFR and gotten a PDC (IFR clearance) then out of the blue said they were VFR which adds to the controller workload (and is something very unusual for an airliner to fly on a VFR plan). Departure also knew exactly what they were doing, unlike your characterization. They were only confirming something that was highly unusual. In the U.S., controllers are taught to confirm and question anything unusual, because that's how errors and accidents can occur.

    • @kewkabe
      @kewkabe 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@racerboom3389 I don't know the details here, but for example there's a limit on how long a flight plan will stay in the system past the proposed departure time. It's pretty normal.

    • @llaughridge
      @llaughridge 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kewkabe Flight plan would be active for 2 hours after receiving clearance before being dropped. If they got their PDC 30 minutes before, the plan should have still been active.

    • @kewkabe
      @kewkabe 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@llaughridge The computer doesn't know when they call up for clearance (or get a PDC which is a separate system). It goes off P-times.

    • @thawekpl
      @thawekpl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kewkabe ok, so it's slightly different. When I heard "coordinate" in most European countries the controller assistant (as there are always two guys on the position, executive and assist) would physically make a call to the station whereas the coordination is needed, so they wouldn't get into only on the system indication but they'd hear that from a "human", that's why you wouldn't be asked again and again here :D.
      Good to know how's it working on other side of the lake. Thanks!