What many people forget: the moon is aside from other benefits, a perfect PRACTISE to colonize other worlds. Making a mistake on moon isnt so bad than on say Europa or Mars
Being only light seconds away is huge. Also, establishing a base on the moon makes it possible to get help and supplies to mars much easier to respond to than trying to launch from earth. Also, before anyone arrives at Mars, we can turn the landing pad on Mars into an IKEA waiting for the astronauts to show up with the screw driver and hammer. On the moon we can also grow food in the lava tubes and light them with artificial lighting, raise chickens and turkeys and with that much water, we could pond raise fish and crustaceans, as well as grains and cereals. Any pound of food you raise on the Moon is a major savings. We must remember that the surface of the moon is a shooting gallery and the risk of solar flair radiation is ever present. This is why we have to live and farm under the surface. The dust on the moon is an interesting threat and blessing. The dust gets everywhere and ruins couplings and pivots, but I understand that if you hit the dust with microwaves you can get the dust to anneal to form a crust. It may be a quick way to make paved roads and maybe glass bricks. Or just a way to keep the dust at bay around the base. There is no atmosphere, but there are multiple impacts a day from meteors coming in at ballistic speeds that will throw up the dust to settle everywhere.
Industrializing the moon is our best bet. The earth wouldn't get polluted nearly as much and all of the toxic waste is left on the moon. Also, all of the CO2 emissions emitted by factories on the moon would help to create an atmosphere that we could use as leverage in terraforming it to become habitable.
Gravity on the Moon is pretty low for retaining an atmosphere, but putting a robotic/telepresence factory complex on the Moon would allow us to mine it and build space infrastructure and materials without having to boost the materials out of Earth's gravity well. Cool.
On days like this I can't help but appreciate the miracle of internet. Instead of watching unsatisfying pop-science show intertwined with cringe worthy ads on TV I can watch Isaac Arthur.
Arthur really does blow away even things like NOVA, which have become so dumbed down as to be almost unwatchable. I'd much rather listen to Arthur than smug ol' Brian Greene.
I used to love NOVA and Nature; the strict-documentary style of the '80s has all but vanished. I also used to love 'In Search Of...' , not only for delving scientifically yet suspensefully into the enigmas of our time, but also because Leonard Nimoy had a fantastic narrative style. +John Vance
bangskij He has about a dozen support staff - but well-taken point. That should be an indicator of how hard mass media is actually trying to educate and inform audiences, vs. whatever all those resources are _actually_ accomplishing.
Also making glass windows in a an oxygen free atmosphere makes it extremely strong, close to steel but transparent. Could easily make metallic glass structures for different applications, from space craft to buildings components.
I know its an old comment but I was hoping more on the uranium that exists on the moon that could be enriched enough to fuel fission drives. Basically build and test the fission rocket on earth then send that rocket to lunar orbit empty where we refuel it around the moon then we use that rocket as a freighter to take us anywhere in the solar system.
Michael Streeter but that's almost only personal advancement, and while I'd love it as much, I still want to just lay on the grass and be awed by the incredible things that we accomplished
No, I'm not talking about my own personal advancement. When I'm saying I'd like to be doing it, I'm saying l'd like to play a direct part of these incredible things, rather than look on at accomplishments.
Matteo Del Gallo satanic tribes missions the parasites who are now infesting the earth now wants to pollute the moon as well better if they wants to carry out their weird experiment let them try out some dead planet like mars that would indeed be good for earth....
Finally someone talking about the Moon again!!! Im not against the Mars dreamers but come on! The MOON IS A NO BRAINER!!! We should have established bases there decades ago!!
yeah we being a bit lazy, i think its becuse we got shocked over how freaking big the universe is, like when you feel the water and feel how cold it is, and wonder if maybe you could just not jump into it. But its gonna happen, ether we go there or we die here, its that simple, and we know it.
Other countries wanted to be the first on the moon so that pushed USA. Now China wants to have the first base on the moon. Their is one issue there think China does not see. Russia and USA see it you can easily just put a base on the moon but does it pay for itself or is it just going to be more wasted tax dollars? So getting a base there without having sustained income now you have a base that will fall into disrepair when the first major economy krysis hits. USA was smart by getting companies involved to think and develop the other infrastructures processes that will be needed if you want the base to pay for itself. Plus think things have been on hold till they develop a fusion reaction that can be contained. What is the point of getting H3 for electricity if you can not use it yet? One element that will be a vital key to moon base profitability. As other minerals costs more and more to mine we will eventually meet a threshold where it will be cheaper to go to the moon and mine and then send the material back to earth. While at the same time saving our limited supply of clean drinking water that we have on this planet. But their is one factor all countries should be looking at right now is the cost of green house gases versus human health. If we can do more of this stuff on the moon limiting the CO2 emissions then that could have a mass savings when it comes to human health or even all life health for that matter.
As a writer who has always been afraid of hard-science fiction, I take comfort in this channel. If I ever need to figure out how hard it would be to do something, or what tech needs to be developed first, I come here. As of today you have 556,000 subs. Good on you and please keep up the good work!
Playing Kerbal Space Program, these kinds of vids are extremely helpful, and just listening for fun is amazing. And he explains everything better than soapy science channels
My Jeb started a fuel mining company on the Mun with a gas station on the Mun's orbit. It gives quite a big difference, but only in Mun exploration expeditions. In case of interplanetary trips, I found that only rendezvous of a tanker and a ship on highly elliptical orbit make any sense, but it also took a lot of time. Delivering the fuel by a single stage vehicle to the most desired LKO is very inefficient even using aero breaking - rather a not desirable maneuver in the real word. I used only chemical rockets to simulate the current technology status. Nuclear engine also didn't change a lot the situation, the number of deliveries to return the investment was crazy high. It was inspired by this film OFC.
Have we extincted the Lunar Whales already? I think we are more like students learning new technologies that will be a boon to the people of earth and a stepping stone for the people who will go to Mars. Much easier to build the Mars ship at one of the Lagrange points and do a push off rather than a launch out of a deep gravity well.
RobotZer0 - it's also the place to build the prefab modules for assembling space colonies in orbit, and all the solar cell sheets for solar power satellites.
Well, Its not a small endeavour, but its a nessesary steping stone for the simple fact that the mood is by far the best refueling station and spacecraft manufacturing site in our area. You have ICE to make fuel, low gravity to build massive constructs, no atmosphere to hamper you in sending things in orbit, and rare materials that are nessesary for any high tech construct. Yes, we CAN colonize mars without the moon, but the simple fact that the moon is the perfect spot to refuel a starship, or build killometer long solar reflectors to power up the earth/other planets or even begin the terraforming process of mars (using the reflectors to help heat up the surface, and power up the gigantic magnetic field generators needed to shield mars from the solar wind), it makes the moon a crucial asset to have on hand during ANY expansion and exploitation plan.
@@shogged Go big and die early. Better to learn the lessons and improve your likelihood of surviving. Also getting a stable colony going on the moon is a great start so that we can prepare Mars for the astronauts before they get there. We can prepare a lot of habitat materials ready to be unpacked and assembled. Settle the moon and turn Mars into a ready IKEA.
There's more hard knowledge in any 5 minutes of one of these videos, than there is in whole, hour or more long "shows" on the supposed "learning" channels (e.g. Discovery, etc.)
Hard to believe, creeping up on 100k, that 10k was only 8 or 9 months ago. Though I do kinda miss those days when I could actually reply to every comment and have conversations. :)
I have to say: What an extraordinary channel this is. Mr Arthur is opening up a consciousness that is mostly closed for most people due to lack of imagination. Those that are listening to this and Mr. Authur himself are inviting a new conversation that needs to happen in this generation. If enough people are thinking about these future problems then these problems won’t be future but will be the present faster than we think. The questions we ask tell us who we are. Even is there isn’t an answer.
I am a very new viewer to his videos and i really enjoy them. I cant place his accent though? Some words are really strange and sometimes i simply do not understand what he just said. Where does he come from?
Molester thank you for your response, i am now a 2 week veteran lol of Isaak and figured out he has a speech impediment. Though after a couple of vids my tiny brain automatically adjusted and compensated for the difference in speech.
I swear every few days I see minutephysics, seeker, smarter everyday, or some other channel give a 1 minute summary of a topic Isaac did a year ago, butchering the details and leaving out extremely important parts. It irks me that these channels get millions of views on a video they spent a few hours on while Isaac here does real work putting together amazing content.
I wouldn't call a week or month a few hours, you gotta remember people in general tend to see shorter videos which is a motivation to shorten videos, even at the cost of detailing
ginbelg1 I agree. He improved my knowledge of helicopter control systems, which I didn't think was possible, considering I've already taught myself on the subject via books and flying in flight sims. I wouldn't label that kind of content as 'lacking depth'. He even did his own experiments and demonstrations on the subject.
For some strange reason you have risen even higher in my estimation because of your knowledge of the underpants gnomes. A great analogy to an even greater presentation. These videos I use like bed time stories and I am very grateful for the political neautrality, scientific excesses (big imaginings) and now for the entertaining humor too. Thanks Isaac :)
Wish a course could be had to deliver this content in a “lesson plan” forum for middle and high school students. His delivery is exceptional and the content is made so inspiring.
Most SciFi have "Magnetic Boots" to keep people walking upright tbh from what I know of biology would not a "Magnetic Vest" be better, to actually get the pressure on the entire body?
Solar craft would be constructed of non-magnetic materials, except for the floors. Passengers would wear magnetic suits and boots to pull them to the floor approximating earths gravity. I think that a 'Babylon 5' type rotating cylinder ship would be better. Also, it would be better to build a '2001 Space Odyssey' space station orbiting Earth wear humans can manage and maintain robots which build on the low gravity moon. Humans must have gravity.
Of course they will. They're into the asteroids. Or to the machines. The point being, labor jobs are going away and will not come back. The day of the strong back and weak mind is going away, everybody they who can needs to get an education. It's the only thing that will save us from communism
Most of the oxygen in smelting comes from the ore itself. It is released from the ore through the process of pyrolysis. Large amounts of oxygen are a byproduct of smelting on earth, and that will be the case on the moon also.
@@michaelfoye1135 ok point taken but i guess my thinking was more thatching in a vacuum would be more efficient because the lack of ambition free oxygen to react with would reduce the amount of waste slag
@@firefox5926 You are correct about that. Working from ingots will not have a tendency to oxidize unless O2 is introduced intentionally. The vacuum environment allows for a much more effectively controlled environment during many industrial processes. Including processes that require the introduction of materials which would oxidize in a terrestrial atmosphere.
I've been waiting for this to happen since the 70s. We are barely closer to colonizing the moon now then we where in the 80's. I was so certain as a young man in the 80's that by 2020-2030 we would have colonies living full time on the moon. Now I just hope that we can start making better headway toward it.
You haven't already? It's marked with permanent marker on my calendar. A bit problematic that my calendar is on my phone but... oh well, you get used to it.
I subbed around the upward and bound series and I've just caught up with your videos. I just want to say this has been outstanding digest for my own science fiction writing, of which also emphasise scientific accuracy. Thanks Isaac :)
The moon makes sense as a low-gravity manufacturing hub for larger space craft and satellites, while also being a good staging area for exploring the rest of the solar system. Like other commenters have pointed out, its (relative) proximity to Earth is good for getting a hang of things before we commit ourselves to distant planets.
Nope try China and now Russia...looks like Elon is taking a break from Mars and looking at the moon. NOthing about mining in any treaty...2021 here...anything is possible.....
How in the world do you put these videos out every week? I happen to know for a fact that it takes a gargantuan amount of work and time to put out edited videos like these (that's not including the script, research, gathering footage, etc). So either you spend almost every waking hour working on these, are one of the most amazing video editors to ever exist, or more likely a combination of the two. However it truly is, excellent work.
Matteo Del Gallo Up until recently he had one guy doing all the graphics for him, he recently brought on some additional volunteers to help out as well.
AstroFocus Indeed. Arthur makes great videos that are informative and give some insight into the possible shape of things to come. Sometimes I just want to throw up my hands and shout, "why aren't we doing this now?". I just hope I live long enough to see some of it. Hopefully with the likes of Space X spearheading a path into space we can start doing some of these things sooner rather than later.
I love these videos. We live in such a vast universe, it would be nice to explore even a small part of it. I am hoping that colonizing the moon and mars will lead to cheaper and faster methods of traveling through space. Plus I like the idea of terraforming other worlds.
Absolutely brilliant show, Explaining the knowledge of what is really happening in the World, Love your show and learned so much, Beautifully spoken Isaac, Love Julie xx.💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜
Arthur, you've made the only compelling argument I've seen for going to the moon beside the scientific research. Although, I still think the idea that we need to go to the moon to get to Mars is idiotic.
the saddest part of the episode is the - how many non-scientific reasons to go to the moon he has skipped ))) Moon offers a lot of practical reason to be a manufacturing base, which can benefit to the people on Earth and climate on the planet, or workplaces (teleoperating, moon minecraft MMORPG, stations, satellites, solar collectors in Lagrange points, enormous data centers, cheap energy(not on the moon, but in space), etc) However, Mars offers a possible answer about life origin or early stage of developing the life and it is a very important possibility.
Wonderful content! You really expanded my view on what's actually possible in space. Don't really have time for non-fiction book reading, and what's on pop culture vine (movies, TV shows, video games, etc) always seemed so far fetched, unrealistic and breaking physics or economics. But the stuff you describe in your videos makes me absolutely giddy about the future.
Much as I enjoy Isaac Arthur videos, and I do appreciate they deal with higher concepts rather than achievable shorter term realities, whenever he's discussing the more obtainable things like on this video, I spend my whole time thinking "supply chain". Even with a decent sized moon installation, you still can't just fabricate and build everything on the moon just like that. The sheer amount of production plant for all the things you'd need for even what we'd consider mundane technology would run into the hundreds of thousands of tonnes and such diverse material requirements it's crazy. You can't just say "3D printing" and all of that goes away. Smelting iron on the moon (though still very difficult) or making the lunar equivalent of a concrete block, or making fuel - yes, only a few tens of billions of dollars and a few hundred tonnes of plant required to make that happen. Making a component that requires a hundred different sub-components and THEIR sub-components using a total of hundreds of different materials all created using thousands of different processes, with each and every process, however simple, potentially requiring tonnes of unique production plant, means you are needing a city sized installation before you can even make a clock radio, let alone a spaceship. Globalisation alone makes our technological lifestyles possible, and a production-level moon base still requires all that globalisation, with the moon's link to it being by way of a prohibitively expensive Saturn V equivalent. This is why we don't live on the Moon, simple as that.
You take it one step of a time, there is no magic hand-waving. Up until recently everything had halted. Now private industry is looking to do the heavy lifting for completely different reasons that don't involve a cold war.
the first run to the moon wher of pride and the second with nasa will by the same, If we as humans wand to go too the stars we have make the leap from a kapital driven adventurer to a Sicens bast cultur.
Pretty sure the Moon is a much better choice for a permanent colony than Mars. A Moon colony seems economically viable while I don't see that for Mars. People often forget that humans don't go to live somewhere because they can but because there's something in it for them.
Mars and any other body in solar system can be economically viable, not the point of the video. Ruch to mars, just cuz we can - yep, a bit questionable "plan", however, it does not mean it should fail.
Not even Antarctica is economically viable. We only have a base there for science. A body that is more expensive to live on and _much_ more expensive to get to and from? I don't see it. What's their product? What's their USP? What's so much cheaper to make or dig up on Mars that it's worth the cost? I think you might be confusing the possibility to be self-sustaining with the ability to be economically viable. Remember all those cultures that were self-sustaining before the Europeans came and made them poor? Sure, they were exploited and everything but they were also suddenly exposed to a global marketplace. If you can't keep up, that makes you poor. Or in other words, not economically viable. Mars would be poor. Until the Earth explodes, any ability to be self-sustaining doesn't help Mars one bit to avoid that fate. The only thing that might save them is that they might be _so_ hard to get to, that they are basically isolated. Then they can do their own thing and technologically fall behind Earth in relative peace.
+Penny Lane - the top few meters of lunar soil alone is worth more than all previous human economic activity combined. It's actually worth more than the whole Earth, in terms of raw materials, since more of it is more accessible. (It's geologically mostly dead and cold, most of Earth is too hot to dig in.) Once the infrastructure is built, manufacturing and agriculture in space will be much, much, much cheaper, safer, greener and more sustainable than doing it on Earth.
I really don't think it is at the moment. You've got to transport everything up there, you've got to build every square meter of real estate, you've got no free rock you can use for radiation shielding and most importantly, you've got no natural resources. I'd say you _need_ a Moon base before you can even think about building rotating habitats. You don't want to hurl all the building materials up there from Earth.
Collapsing everything in the galactic region into a gravitically bound area that wont be destroyed by the expanding universe, huh... *Grabs his wrench* Alright guys, let's do this!
One of my favourite episodes, and that's saying something, cause I like this Upwards bound series a lot. And this is something that we might actually see in our lifetime. The start of a colony on the Moon.
@@texasrox2010 I am not a native in the english language so I have no idea on what is and what is not an accent? I said that i was a first time viewer, and I had no idea of his speech impediment. You cant expect everyone to immediately know such things.
Reasons for space colonization on an industrial scale: *Consistent, cheap Solar power* -Living space for th- -Our manifest de- -The promised land for God's ch- -Deus V- *Places to live that don't involve deporting or exterminating for the locals* *Building massive zero-Gee structures* *Ultra-Cheap mining.*
If your content were a drug it would be the most addictive, cause I started watching you one day ago and now can't stop. The visuals, the information, and the science you base it on is amazing.
Well the artist for that image is Polish, so its probably coincidental, and he actually did that for a Dyson Swarm image, which are really hard to visualize.
I suppose that would be one way to assure the sun would never set on the British space empire. I do also wonder at what lower level of Earth orbital satellite construction it makes sense to start mining on the moon, somewhere before or around orbital rings or space elevators perhaps but i guess there are too many cost factors with too little information.
Hi Issac, Awesome video as usual! I'm really interested in the way you conduct research, gather info and storyboard it to be presented in a video. Is there any way you could give us a "Making of" of sorts for one of your popular episodes? Thank you!
I have always liked this idea ,one huge reason very close ! Building colonies on the moon is a real possibility it will have to be a return on the investment some time down the road . Agree a great stepping stone ,build on the moon get our sea legs then push out farther to Mars etc...
stephen lang --- don't like to complain when it seems like everyone else is applauding and it may seem like nitpicking but is it to much to ask for people who make videos to spell correctly and the narrator to pronounce words correctly ? The word is crater. Correct ? Not crator or cratore.
Just a thought, i don't know if you read these comments or not, but i am curious, the general assumption is that all the matter colliding with earth, the moon and other celestial bodies is that the mass is added to it. However, we know that even here on earth, we are losing mass faster than what we are gaining it. Thinking about an impact on the moon, the amount of material ejected by the impact would be far greater than the mass of the meteorite. Given enough time, the reduced mass of both earth and the moon perhaps is the cause of the gravity between us becoming weaker and the moon drifting further away, so potentially, if we could in fact, add more mass to the moon, perhaps we could slow its rate of escape and create more 'balanced' seasons? Perhaps building a moon base and using the mining profits to send back to earth and once a mining colony is set up and functioning, start looking at bringing in asteroids to land on the moon that we can mine. If we are looking for specific minerals or whatever, we can select the appropriate asteroid to bring in, it may take years, if not decades, but having the moon as launch platform the the rest of the solar system should reduce costs substantially. What do you think?
When you brought up the concept of disassembling the moon to provide resources for a orbiting colony, in got me thinking. Using the entire moon would be of course, devastating to the earth, causing catastrophic geological upheaval. Even scaling back this idea, we are looking at using vast quantities of lunar resources to bring to earth and also to colonize the rest of the solar system. At what point does the removal of mass from the moon begin to affect the earth in any measurable way? Small but measurable changes to tidal forces, as an example. I know this might be seen as an infinitesimal issue and might take generations to cause any effect at all but it seems like it would be a fairly simple (for a mathematician, not me) calculation to perform and at least give us a clue about our impact. There was a point when previous generations (and even some still today) could not fathom humans having impact on earth's climate. I am not a tree hugger either, but I think our impact on other planets or moons is an ethics discussion that at some point will need to be addressed. Love your videos and hope that I am alive to see some of the future that you discuss.
Must admit this is a very interesting and thought provoking video for space travel, long time living, terraforming and mining mineral/precious metals on both inner and outer planets or moons/asteroids. Very well explained even for some one who has not even thought of any of this, also to those of us that have wondered about how/where or why concerning space travel and colonising other worlds.
I really wish we would industrialize moons, freedom from earth's gravity will allow us to be bigger machines that can be used for earth and space expansion.
+pumpuppthevolume - fuel is no problem. There's some water on the moon, and water is unrefined, high grade rocket fuel. Plenty of air, water and rocket fuel up there, trapped in the surface gravel and especially in polar craters.
Bo Zo....oh yeah that's how we can do it .....but we will still need detailed surveys of those areas BadBeardBill .......well I am not a fan of those ....I was thinking of more practical stuff in the close future
sombodi200 And we could just launch our waste products and pollution toward Venus, say, or the Sun. Not like it'll be hurting any environments harboring life. Let big industry pollute with impunity and there's no telling what it can accomplish.
if we use the moon for controversial experiments, particularly nano-tech, would we be worried about a Grey goo sencerio taking place there as much as we would here on earth?
Some illegal Grey scenarios already accounted by Andromeda council members, including their underground bases on the moon. Those Grey are back to their Zeta constellation, and forbidden to Sol due to controversial experiments and slave labor.
I'm so happy I found this channel. After CR got canceled because of the pandemic, I had nothing to listen to during cooking and doing other housekeeping chores . You gave me something I enjoy way more :)
Nothing lives there, it's arguably the perfect place to offload nearly all our polluting heavy industry, which could potentially take this planet back to pre industrial levels of pollution.
You cant go to the moon! "words of Irwin Shapiro from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics indicate that the Moon is a real mystery for scientists. “The best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error; the Moon does not exist. The Moon is bigger than it should be, apparently older than it should be and much lighter in mass than it should be. It occupies an unlikely orbit and is so extraordinary that all existing explanations for its presence are fraught with difficulties are none of them could be considered remotely watertight.”"
Personally I think the moon would be a learning and development curve for us before going to Mars. Perfect tech on the moon the use it in on Mars tried and tested. Plus the moon then is usable as the space gateway instead of building one in orbit of the earth. It would have most of what we need to build with and it has a lot less gravity than earth so obviously would need a lot less fuel than an earth launch. It's a sensible direction why waist money on something that would be made obsolete by technology over the decades after its completion. The moon base would be upgradable and large enough to make great real estate for industrial/colonisation which would relieve the earth of overpopulation. From there to Mars then we have a true multi planetary race which is virtually impossible to wipe out even by natures standards. Great vids Isaac really enjoy your work thanks
new subscriber, I love your content. Question: wouldn't industrializing the moon, changing its overall mass and such affect the weather here on earth, tides and such?
I suspect so. Tides could be effected and its possible that the moon might start moving closer to earth more quickly, especially if you are shipping stuff to earth as well.
18:19 altho doing so would almost certainly destroy earth from messing with the tidal forces of such a short period of time lol also fish are going to have trouble...
Moon has 1/6 gravity. If that's good for manufacturing, then orbital factories where you can have any gravity you want, are even better. In one rotating station, you can have a zero G stockpile in the hub, a micro-G area for heavy transport, low-G factories, one-G crew sections, and even arbitrarily high-G areas if you wanted. Even better. We don't need no stinking planets. (Or silly moons.) Space is the place.
But the moon has raw material, and unmatched orbital stability. And heaven help us if we get space espionage or even warfare, whether between space-faring nation-states or corporations, etc. Orbital factories would have little defense and need to be hardened against lots of threats. A factory in a moon crater or tunnel would be much better sheltered. Piracy developed right along European exploration overseas, I imagine the same might happen in space.
OP: Yeah. Planets and Moons aren't all that good for habitation. They're great for resource extraction, of course. And they'll be fairly well defended, if need be. Remember, they have to protect against potentially large asteroids. Gonna need some beefy lasers.
+Cuvtixo D - A lunar bunker might be tough enough to survive an attack, but it would have to be a real military bunker, not just a surface base. Otherwise it's probably about the same, except the moon is a more predictable target. Probably you live in Cleveland or some place that's surely more vulnerable than an orbital station would be. Whoever controls space can destroy any settlement anywhere anyway, on or in the Earth or wherever, so I don't see it as an additional problem.
this was my first time to see this channel. Really enjoyed watching and learning about this fascinating topic. I am fascinated by the moon and spend many hours watching and studying it. I have seen many examples of structures on the moon so I think what you are talking about is already happening.
What many people forget: the moon is aside from other benefits, a perfect PRACTISE to colonize other worlds. Making a mistake on moon isnt so bad than on say Europa or Mars
@Stesilaus i think he meant like we coulld ship rescue teams in 3 days rather than 2 years but yeah that too i guess
Most indeedidly indeed. Moon 4tw!
@@OK-ws7ti lol
Being only light seconds away is huge. Also, establishing a base on the moon makes it possible to get help and supplies to mars much easier to respond to than trying to launch from earth. Also, before anyone arrives at Mars, we can turn the landing pad on Mars into an IKEA waiting for the astronauts to show up with the screw driver and hammer. On the moon we can also grow food in the lava tubes and light them with artificial lighting, raise chickens and turkeys and with that much water, we could pond raise fish and crustaceans, as well as grains and cereals. Any pound of food you raise on the Moon is a major savings. We must remember that the surface of the moon is a shooting gallery and the risk of solar flair radiation is ever present. This is why we have to live and farm under the surface. The dust on the moon is an interesting threat and blessing. The dust gets everywhere and ruins couplings and pivots, but I understand that if you hit the dust with microwaves you can get the dust to anneal to form a crust. It may be a quick way to make paved roads and maybe glass bricks. Or just a way to keep the dust at bay around the base. There is no atmosphere, but there are multiple impacts a day from meteors coming in at ballistic speeds that will throw up the dust to settle everywhere.
@@chrisrichardson8881 Probably best to be underground in lavatubes at first.
Industrializing the moon is our best bet. The earth wouldn't get polluted nearly as much and all of the toxic waste is left on the moon. Also, all of the CO2 emissions emitted by factories on the moon would help to create an atmosphere that we could use as leverage in terraforming it to become habitable.
Terraforming the moon is iffy at best. It barely even has a atmosphere to begin with. Almost complete vacuum.
Did not expect you guys here.
@@definetlynotacomment1184 same
SON. WE ARE GOING TO THE MOON
Gravity on the Moon is pretty low for retaining an atmosphere, but putting a robotic/telepresence factory complex on the Moon would allow us to mine it and build space infrastructure and materials without having to boost the materials out of Earth's gravity well. Cool.
On days like this I can't help but appreciate the miracle of internet. Instead of watching unsatisfying pop-science show intertwined with cringe worthy ads on TV I can watch Isaac Arthur.
Ads are the best thing on TV, imho. By far.
Arthur really does blow away even things like NOVA, which have become so dumbed down as to be almost unwatchable. I'd much rather listen to Arthur than smug ol' Brian Greene.
The internet is an unfiltered place for information! Choose wisely
I used to love NOVA and Nature; the strict-documentary style of the '80s has all but vanished. I also used to love 'In Search Of...' , not only for delving scientifically yet suspensefully into the enigmas of our time, but also because Leonard Nimoy had a fantastic narrative style.
+John Vance
bangskij
He has about a dozen support staff - but well-taken point. That should be an indicator of how hard mass media is actually trying to educate and inform audiences, vs. whatever all those resources are _actually_ accomplishing.
Also making glass windows in a an oxygen free atmosphere makes it extremely strong, close to steel but transparent. Could easily make metallic glass structures for different applications, from space craft to buildings components.
Transparent aluminium is a better option i believe
I know its an old comment but I was hoping more on the uranium that exists on the moon that could be enriched enough to fuel fission drives. Basically build and test the fission rocket on earth then send that rocket to lunar orbit empty where we refuel it around the moon then we use that rocket as a freighter to take us anywhere in the solar system.
@@BS-vm5bt
Honestly, yeah. And that is a tech we have experience making.
"We like to think big on this channel"
God, I love this channel.
Prot big even for a type2 civilization
This video is a parody i would assume , coz if you believe this shit you've got major problems .
Can't blame you for liking this channel- it's great!
Big lies!
Gonna lie, lie big
I REALLY want to be able to look up in the night sky, and see city lights on that grey ball floating in the sky
I'd like to stand on the Moon and see city lights on that blue-green ball floating in the sky
Michael Streeter but that's almost only personal advancement, and while I'd love it as much, I still want to just lay on the grass and be awed by the incredible things that we accomplished
No, I'm not talking about my own personal advancement. When I'm saying I'd like to be doing it, I'm saying l'd like to play a direct part of these incredible things, rather than look on at accomplishments.
I guess you're right, i never thought that if I was on earth, I wouldn't be on the moon
Matteo Del Gallo satanic tribes missions the parasites who are now infesting the earth now wants to pollute the moon as well better if they wants to carry out their weird experiment let them try out some dead planet like mars that would indeed be good for earth....
Finally someone talking about the Moon again!!! Im not against the Mars dreamers but come on! The MOON IS A NO BRAINER!!! We should have established bases there decades ago!!
yeah we being a bit lazy, i think its becuse we got shocked over how freaking big the universe is, like when you feel the water and feel how cold it is, and wonder if maybe you could just not jump into it.
But its gonna happen, ether we go there or we die here, its that simple, and we know it.
Other countries wanted to be the first on the moon so that pushed USA. Now China wants to have the first base on the moon. Their is one issue there think China does not see. Russia and USA see it you can easily just put a base on the moon but does it pay for itself or is it just going to be more wasted tax dollars? So getting a base there without having sustained income now you have a base that will fall into disrepair when the first major economy krysis hits. USA was smart by getting companies involved to think and develop the other infrastructures processes that will be needed if you want the base to pay for itself. Plus think things have been on hold till they develop a fusion reaction that can be contained. What is the point of getting H3 for electricity if you can not use it yet? One element that will be a vital key to moon base profitability. As other minerals costs more and more to mine we will eventually meet a threshold where it will be cheaper to go to the moon and mine and then send the material back to earth. While at the same time saving our limited supply of clean drinking water that we have on this planet. But their is one factor all countries should be looking at right now is the cost of green house gases versus human health. If we can do more of this stuff on the moon limiting the CO2 emissions then that could have a mass savings when it comes to human health or even all life health for that matter.
I think we already have a base on the moon I have no evidence to support this of course it's just a feeling with how secretive the government is LOL.
No profit motive. Might have to just replace the economic system before going out into the solar system becomes worth a damn.
If we took the entire budget of all the militaries in the world and committed it to the moon we would be there and colonized in less than 5 yesrs
As a writer who has always been afraid of hard-science fiction, I take comfort in this channel. If I ever need to figure out how hard it would be to do something, or what tech needs to be developed first, I come here. As of today you have 556,000 subs. Good on you and please keep up the good work!
he currently has 764k subs
Playing Kerbal Space Program, these kinds of vids are extremely helpful, and just listening for fun is amazing. And he explains everything better than soapy science channels
My Jeb started a fuel mining company on the Mun with a gas station on the Mun's orbit. It gives quite a big difference, but only in Mun exploration expeditions. In case of interplanetary trips, I found that only rendezvous of a tanker and a ship on highly elliptical orbit make any sense, but it also took a lot of time. Delivering the fuel by a single stage vehicle to the most desired LKO is very inefficient even using aero breaking - rather a not desirable maneuver in the real word. I used only chemical rockets to simulate the current technology status. Nuclear engine also didn't change a lot the situation, the number of deliveries to return the investment was crazy high.
It was inspired by this film OFC.
We're whalers on the Moon
We carry a harpoon !
For they ain't no whales
So we tell tall tales
And sing our whaling tune.
I like "FUTURAMA" too...especially Leela, and Bender!
Have we extincted the Lunar Whales already? I think we are more like students learning new technologies that will be a boon to the people of earth and a stepping stone for the people who will go to Mars. Much easier to build the Mars ship at one of the Lagrange points and do a push off rather than a launch out of a deep gravity well.
@Ryan Sedy Engage!! Make it so.
Your hard work is greatly appreciated, as always.
Jeffry Garew as is your blue crystal meth, Heisenberg.
@@HornyDude83?
@@cosmicarc7283 he was referring to Jeff's profile picture, which is Heisenberg/Walter White from Breaking Bad.
"We like to think big on this channel"
- Yep, I noticed.
Wow... i was going through the comments while playing the vid and as i read the quote me and isaac said it at the same time... it felt good
Damn it, moon is a shipyard.
If we are going to build space ships , that is where it is gonna happen.
RobotZer0 - it's also the place to build the prefab modules for assembling space colonies in orbit, and all the solar cell sheets for solar power satellites.
Nah, we build those in orbit. Why bother with the Moon's gravity well?
@@notablegoat Because that's where the raw materials you're going to use to build everything resides? That's where you're refining the resources.
Maybe, maybe not. Have you hard of in orbit construction?
You know... That is actually a great idea. 😋
It makes the most sense to start small by colonizing the moon first.
crawl -> stand -> walk -> run -> fly ;P
Maybe if you’re a wimp! Go big or go home
@@shogged slow and steady wins the race.
Well, Its not a small endeavour, but its a nessesary steping stone for the simple fact that the mood is by far the best refueling station and spacecraft manufacturing site in our area. You have ICE to make fuel, low gravity to build massive constructs, no atmosphere to hamper you in sending things in orbit, and rare materials that are nessesary for any high tech construct. Yes, we CAN colonize mars without the moon, but the simple fact that the moon is the perfect spot to refuel a starship, or build killometer long solar reflectors to power up the earth/other planets or even begin the terraforming process of mars (using the reflectors to help heat up the surface, and power up the gigantic magnetic field generators needed to shield mars from the solar wind), it makes the moon a crucial asset to have on hand during ANY expansion and exploitation plan.
@@shogged Go big and die early. Better to learn the lessons and improve your likelihood of surviving. Also getting a stable colony going on the moon is a great start so that we can prepare Mars for the astronauts before they get there. We can prepare a lot of habitat materials ready to be unpacked and assembled. Settle the moon and turn Mars into a ready IKEA.
There's more hard knowledge in any 5 minutes of one of these videos, than there is in whole, hour or more long "shows" on the supposed "learning" channels (e.g. Discovery, etc.)
Really enjoy these talks. I hope future generation can watch these episodes the same way we read Jules Verne and say "That guy had it figured out."
Pile of carbon I was thinking the same thing
Seems like we read different Jules Verne. The guy predicted some pretty wild shit. But yeah, Isaacs videos would have that feel
No matter how late it is when an Isaac Arthur video is uploaded I must always watch it. That's just how good he is!
I watched it a day late. First time since finding channel in January.
You are my favourite TH-camr. I can listen to you all day. I've rewatched most of you videos. Big love. Pad
Hard to believe, creeping up on 100k, that 10k was only 8 or 9 months ago. Though I do kinda miss those days when I could actually reply to every comment and have conversations. :)
+Isaac Arthur - make that 126k. At this geometric rate, you'll soon have the army needed to enact Plan 9.
I have to say:
What an extraordinary channel this is.
Mr Arthur is opening up a consciousness that is mostly closed for most people due to lack of imagination. Those that are listening to this and Mr. Authur himself are inviting a new conversation that needs to happen in this generation. If enough people are thinking about these future problems then these problems won’t be future but will be the present faster than we think. The questions we ask tell us who we are. Even is there isn’t an answer.
Put a bank on the moon and a hallway of PO boxes so you can use it as a tax shelter. There's a step 2.
I feel like this is a really really good video for people who are new to the channel, to get an idea of what it's all about.
Happy Arthursday!
GLT Music I wish I could show this video to everyone who has ever said there is no value to space exploration
Arthursday is the best day of the week. An early weekend.
Ok, go play with the ball now.
I am a very new viewer to his videos and i really enjoy them. I cant place his accent though? Some words are really strange and sometimes i simply do not understand what he just said. Where does he come from?
He has a spéech impediment, but he puts subtitles in all his videos.
Molester thank you for your response, i am now a 2 week veteran lol of Isaak and figured out he has a speech impediment. Though after a couple of vids my tiny brain automatically adjusted and compensated for the difference in speech.
Yoppy Halilintar has to
I swear every few days I see minutephysics, seeker, smarter everyday, or some other channel give a 1 minute summary of a topic Isaac did a year ago, butchering the details and leaving out extremely important parts. It irks me that these channels get millions of views on a video they spent a few hours on while Isaac here does real work putting together amazing content.
I wouldn't call a week or month a few hours, you gotta remember people in general tend to see shorter videos which is a motivation to shorten videos, even at the cost of detailing
Smarter everyday goes quite in depth and puts a ton of work into his videos, bad choice for the point you're making
ginbelg1 I agree. He improved my knowledge of helicopter control systems, which I didn't think was possible, considering I've already taught myself on the subject via books and flying in flight sims. I wouldn't label that kind of content as 'lacking depth'. He even did his own experiments and demonstrations on the subject.
@@hatman4818 maybe when he said lacking depth he meant the thickness of his screen
Hobbes : IF , U BELIEVE APES 👩🚀🙈🙉🙊👩🚀 CAN FLY .? .
tfw when I'm rewatching SFIA videos and keep accidentally unliking because I've already liked them
lol ikr
You need a tag line, like Scott Manley's "fly safe." Maybe "dream big."
“Drink & snack”
'We like to think big on this channel'
That is still an understatement :)
Watch 'Evacuating Earth' for the best version of it.
@@HuntingTarg how would "Evacuating Earth" be bigger tan moving galaxys around. LOL
@@MouseGoat
Sorry; best example of IA making an understatement.
For some strange reason you have risen even higher in my estimation because of your knowledge of the underpants gnomes. A great analogy to an even greater presentation. These videos I use like bed time stories and I am very grateful for the political neautrality, scientific excesses (big imaginings) and now for the entertaining humor too. Thanks Isaac :)
John B is that a problem? The internet is so politically polarized that a center perspective is good.
John B “debauchery”? Are you from the Old Testament?
It is now a good day
indeed
6:20
1) lower gravity, easier to load things into orbit
2) close proximity
Wish a course could be had to deliver this content in a “lesson plan” forum for middle and high school students. His delivery is exceptional and the content is made so inspiring.
Isaac, your series is the absolute best!
Keep up the extraordinary work.
Most SciFi have "Magnetic Boots" to keep people walking upright tbh from what I know of biology would not a "Magnetic Vest" be better, to actually get the pressure on the entire body?
long range magnets are hard. and you don't want to get stuck to a wall.
Mag hats
Solar craft would be constructed of non-magnetic materials, except for the floors. Passengers would wear magnetic suits and boots to pull them to the floor approximating earths gravity. I think that a 'Babylon 5' type rotating cylinder ship would be better. Also, it would be better to build a '2001 Space Odyssey' space station orbiting Earth wear humans can manage and maintain robots which build on the low gravity moon. Humans must have gravity.
The magnetic field would have to be fairly hefty and the human body doesn't like being in one for long periods of time.
Now they'll start outsourcing our manufacturing jobs to the moon.
Those damm moonies took my job!
essentially yes, but think about it, u might move to the fucking moon and work there :0
Of course they will. They're into the asteroids. Or to the machines. The point being, labor jobs are going away and will not come back. The day of the strong back and weak mind is going away, everybody they who can needs to get an education. It's the only thing that will save us from communism
Its more likely to be mostly automated, (because of the low gravity and radiation) but with occasional stops by maintenance workers and engineers.
Nah, 'Crooked Hillary' is not president! 'Keep America Great! RE-ELECT PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP!'
6:06 were its a great place to to manufacturing... you can smelt all the iron you want in solar furnaces with no oxygen to interfere...
Most of the oxygen in smelting comes from the ore itself. It is released from the ore through the process of pyrolysis. Large amounts of oxygen are a byproduct of smelting on earth, and that will be the case on the moon also.
@@michaelfoye1135 ok point taken but i guess my thinking was more thatching in a vacuum would be more efficient because the lack of ambition free oxygen to react with would reduce the amount of waste slag
@@firefox5926 You are correct about that. Working from ingots will not have a tendency to oxidize unless O2 is introduced intentionally. The vacuum environment allows for a much more effectively controlled environment during many industrial processes. Including processes that require the introduction of materials which would oxidize in a terrestrial atmosphere.
I've been waiting for this to happen since the 70s. We are barely closer to colonizing the moon now then we where in the 80's. I was so certain as a young man in the 80's that by 2020-2030 we would have colonies living full time on the moon. Now I just hope that we can start making better headway toward it.
Congrats on 90k!!!
Happy Arthursday!!
Yay!!!!
lol, I hadn't noticed that till you mentioned it, 90k, wow, 100k is probably just a few weeks away.
ARTHURSDAY!
You haven't already? It's marked with permanent marker on my calendar. A bit problematic that my calendar is on my phone but... oh well, you get used to it.
Gee, my calendar is printed that way. You just need to catch up with the times!
*Awthuawsday, get the cool accent right!
96ace96 oh boy here we go
Dude your Awesome! Totally love your channel!
I subbed around the upward and bound series and I've just caught up with your videos.
I just want to say this has been outstanding digest for my own science fiction writing, of which also emphasise scientific accuracy.
Thanks Isaac :)
The moon makes sense as a low-gravity manufacturing hub for larger space craft and satellites, while also being a good staging area for exploring the rest of the solar system. Like other commenters have pointed out, its (relative) proximity to Earth is good for getting a hang of things before we commit ourselves to distant planets.
OMG. Giant lava tubes that can house entire cities? Finally, Elon Musk can have his underground volcano lair!
Hope there's no mynocks there.
That's just nasty.
Nope try China and now Russia...looks like Elon is taking a break from Mars and looking at the moon. NOthing about mining in any treaty...2021 here...anything is possible.....
Nope he'd rather go to a place that 6 years away rather than a few hours
Instant like... sits down to watch.
me too
antifusion me 3
addictive.
just discovered this channel. It is amazing from what I see so far. Isaac great job man its appreciated I hope this channel will grow bigger.
How in the world do you put these videos out every week? I happen to know for a fact that it takes a gargantuan amount of work and time to put out edited videos like these (that's not including the script, research, gathering footage, etc). So either you spend almost every waking hour working on these, are one of the most amazing video editors to ever exist, or more likely a combination of the two.
However it truly is, excellent work.
dahitmann Also, probably more than 1 person, at least in the editing part
Matteo Del Gallo Up until recently he had one guy doing all the graphics for him, he recently brought on some additional volunteers to help out as well.
Matteo Del Gallo And the scripts he actually writes all by himself.
If he already has a strong knowledge base, it shouldn't be too hard. #nerdpower
The moment where Isaac Arthur unironically qoutes South Park will never be forgotten by mankind.
12:35 'the moon has a lot of creep'
SPAWN MORE OVERLORDS
Fantastic video so far! Loving these long videos that you make :D
AstroFocus..... kind of short :P
Well, actually its even one of the shorter ones xD
You know what I mean, compared to other channels, he does long videos. I just mean his videos in general xD
He does detailed videos.
AstroFocus
Indeed. Arthur makes great videos that are informative and give some insight into the possible shape of things to come. Sometimes I just want to throw up my hands and shout, "why aren't we doing this now?". I just hope I live long enough to see some of it. Hopefully with the likes of Space X spearheading a path into space we can start doing some of these things sooner rather than later.
I love these videos. We live in such a vast universe, it would be nice to explore even a small part of it. I am hoping that colonizing the moon and mars will lead to cheaper and faster methods of traveling through space. Plus I like the idea of terraforming other worlds.
Thanks for another excellent discussion.
Absolutely brilliant show, Explaining the knowledge of what is really happening in the World, Love your show and learned so much, Beautifully spoken Isaac, Love Julie xx.💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜
your genius on this channel Isaac is so much a "step beyond" the other channels, bravo.
Arthur, you've made the only compelling argument I've seen for going to the moon beside the scientific research. Although, I still think the idea that we need to go to the moon to get to Mars is idiotic.
the saddest part of the episode is the - how many non-scientific reasons to go to the moon he has skipped )))
Moon offers a lot of practical reason to be a manufacturing base, which can benefit to the people on Earth and climate on the planet, or workplaces (teleoperating, moon minecraft MMORPG, stations, satellites, solar collectors in Lagrange points, enormous data centers, cheap energy(not on the moon, but in space), etc)
However, Mars offers a possible answer about life origin or early stage of developing the life and it is a very important possibility.
Wonderful content! You really expanded my view on what's actually possible in space. Don't really have time for non-fiction book reading, and what's on pop culture vine (movies, TV shows, video games, etc) always seemed so far fetched, unrealistic and breaking physics or economics. But the stuff you describe in your videos makes me absolutely giddy about the future.
I see you're keeping up your insane like to view ratio. I look forward to your videos every Thursday morning.
Much as I enjoy Isaac Arthur videos, and I do appreciate they deal with higher concepts rather than achievable shorter term realities, whenever he's discussing the more obtainable things like on this video, I spend my whole time thinking "supply chain". Even with a decent sized moon installation, you still can't just fabricate and build everything on the moon just like that. The sheer amount of production plant for all the things you'd need for even what we'd consider mundane technology would run into the hundreds of thousands of tonnes and such diverse material requirements it's crazy. You can't just say "3D printing" and all of that goes away. Smelting iron on the moon (though still very difficult) or making the lunar equivalent of a concrete block, or making fuel - yes, only a few tens of billions of dollars and a few hundred tonnes of plant required to make that happen.
Making a component that requires a hundred different sub-components and THEIR sub-components using a total of hundreds of different materials all created using thousands of different processes, with each and every process, however simple, potentially requiring tonnes of unique production plant, means you are needing a city sized installation before you can even make a clock radio, let alone a spaceship. Globalisation alone makes our technological lifestyles possible, and a production-level moon base still requires all that globalisation, with the moon's link to it being by way of a prohibitively expensive Saturn V equivalent. This is why we don't live on the Moon, simple as that.
You take it one step of a time, there is no magic hand-waving. Up until recently everything had halted. Now private industry is looking to do the heavy lifting for completely different reasons that don't involve a cold war.
🌟 *Nasa uploaded a video, we're going and staying on the moon.*
Yes but i think is just a little base to cientists only.
@@JoaoGomes-dr5yo
It's big progress, if scientists are there.
@@JoaoGomes-dr5yo CIENTISTAS HEUEUEEUHUUE
@@Shadow77999 heuheuheuh inglês do Joel Santana pow kkkkkkk
the first run to the moon wher of pride and the second with nasa will by the same,
If we as humans wand to go too the stars we have make the leap from a kapital driven adventurer to a Sicens bast cultur.
Pretty sure the Moon is a much better choice for a permanent colony than Mars. A Moon colony seems economically viable while I don't see that for Mars. People often forget that humans don't go to live somewhere because they can but because there's something in it for them.
Mars and any other body in solar system can be economically viable, not the point of the video. Ruch to mars, just cuz we can - yep, a bit questionable "plan", however, it does not mean it should fail.
Not even Antarctica is economically viable. We only have a base there for science. A body that is more expensive to live on and _much_ more expensive to get to and from? I don't see it. What's their product? What's their USP? What's so much cheaper to make or dig up on Mars that it's worth the cost?
I think you might be confusing the possibility to be self-sustaining with the ability to be economically viable. Remember all those cultures that were self-sustaining before the Europeans came and made them poor? Sure, they were exploited and everything but they were also suddenly exposed to a global marketplace. If you can't keep up, that makes you poor. Or in other words, not economically viable. Mars would be poor. Until the Earth explodes, any ability to be self-sustaining doesn't help Mars one bit to avoid that fate. The only thing that might save them is that they might be _so_ hard to get to, that they are basically isolated. Then they can do their own thing and technologically fall behind Earth in relative peace.
+Penny Lane - the top few meters of lunar soil alone is worth more than all previous human economic activity combined. It's actually worth more than the whole Earth, in terms of raw materials, since more of it is more accessible. (It's geologically mostly dead and cold, most of Earth is too hot to dig in.)
Once the infrastructure is built, manufacturing and agriculture in space will be much, much, much cheaper, safer, greener and more sustainable than doing it on Earth.
And free space is a much better choice than the Moon. Look up space settlements. O'neill cylinders.
I really don't think it is at the moment. You've got to transport everything up there, you've got to build every square meter of real estate, you've got no free rock you can use for radiation shielding and most importantly, you've got no natural resources.
I'd say you _need_ a Moon base before you can even think about building rotating habitats. You don't want to hurl all the building materials up there from Earth.
Collapsing everything in the galactic region into a gravitically bound area that wont be destroyed by the expanding universe, huh... *Grabs his wrench* Alright guys, let's do this!
ASNS117Zero hear hold my beer! It will only take a moment…
I'll just build a giant space station in the style of a piece of a dyson swarm to hold your beer. That'd be a good use of resources, right? :D
Seems like critters in all those galaxies might already have plans for that mass.
Bo Zo it not like I'm collapsing it into a black hole or anything, just reorganization of a few million galaxies.
^-- What he said.
One of my favourite episodes, and that's saying something, cause I like this Upwards bound series a lot. And this is something that we might actually see in our lifetime. The start of a colony on the Moon.
First time viewer here and i have to say one thing: I love your accent. "Orth"
Where is he from?
It’s a “speech impairment”
@@texasrox2010 I am not a native in the english language so I have no idea on what is and what is not an accent? I said that i was a first time viewer, and I had no idea of his speech impediment. You cant expect everyone to immediately know such things.
Joelynn Carter
Bro chill, issac is bae let us unite in peace under arthursday
Not 100%, but sounds like a old school southern gentleman accent from an American movie.
5:30 -- Phase 2 is "sell underpants to people who want/need them". All we have to do is find the underpants on the Moon.
Quoting South Park underpants gnomes episode - I love it!
Reasons for space colonization on an industrial scale:
*Consistent, cheap Solar power*
-Living space for th-
-Our manifest de-
-The promised land for God's ch-
-Deus V-
*Places to live that don't involve deporting or exterminating for the locals*
*Building massive zero-Gee structures*
*Ultra-Cheap mining.*
Every day I watch one of your videos and it makes my day 😃😃😃
I really like the overlay of Luna over Europe to give an idea of how large the craters are! Thanks
If your content were a drug it would be the most addictive, cause I started watching you one day ago and now can't stop. The visuals, the information, and the science you base it on is amazing.
ty mate, love the production and I now speak fluent wescaley wabbit..... thanks again
18:50 Why is there a Union Jack stamped onto the Sun? Did the UK learn to terrafom stars?
On to a serious note, exceptional video as always.
Well the artist for that image is Polish, so its probably coincidental, and he actually did that for a Dyson Swarm image, which are really hard to visualize.
I suppose that would be one way to assure the sun would never set on the British space empire.
I do also wonder at what lower level of Earth orbital satellite construction it makes sense to start mining on the moon, somewhere before or around orbital rings or space elevators perhaps but i guess there are too many cost factors with too little information.
We British don't like to sing our own praises too much.
Hi Issac,
Awesome video as usual! I'm really interested in the way you conduct research, gather info and storyboard it to be presented in a video. Is there any way you could give us a "Making of" of sorts for one of your popular episodes?
Thank you!
I'm working a 100k subscriber special video, its going to talk about that a little amongst other things.
I have always liked this idea ,one huge reason very close ! Building colonies on the moon is a real possibility it will have to be a return on the investment some time down the road . Agree a great stepping stone ,build on the moon get our sea legs then push out farther to Mars etc...
I like the idea of comparing colonies along lava tubes to settlements along rivers.
That guy sounds like an intellectual version of Elmer Fudd.
stephen lang --- don't like to complain when it seems like everyone else is applauding and it may seem like nitpicking but is it to much to ask for people who make videos to spell correctly and the narrator to pronounce words correctly ? The word is crater. Correct ? Not crator or cratore.
@ macc240038
Speech impediments learn about them.
How is he advocating destroying the earth?
stephen lang I hope you’re looking beyond a very very minor speech impediment to the planet sized brain talking to you?
watch more videos... after a bit you wont even here it.,
Hey bud, glad to see you post another video. Things haven't been well for me lately, up your videos give me hope for humanities future.
I hope they get better Damien
Isaac Arthur wish this could be real i would be the guinne pig
Success! I no longer require closed captions. :-D
Just a thought, i don't know if you read these comments or not, but i am curious, the general assumption is that all the matter colliding with earth, the moon and other celestial bodies is that the mass is added to it. However, we know that even here on earth, we are losing mass faster than what we are gaining it. Thinking about an impact on the moon, the amount of material ejected by the impact would be far greater than the mass of the meteorite. Given enough time, the reduced mass of both earth and the moon perhaps is the cause of the gravity between us becoming weaker and the moon drifting further away, so potentially, if we could in fact, add more mass to the moon, perhaps we could slow its rate of escape and create more 'balanced' seasons? Perhaps building a moon base and using the mining profits to send back to earth and once a mining colony is set up and functioning, start looking at bringing in asteroids to land on the moon that we can mine. If we are looking for specific minerals or whatever, we can select the appropriate asteroid to bring in, it may take years, if not decades, but having the moon as launch platform the the rest of the solar system should reduce costs substantially. What do you think?
@@maxnaz47 Neat idea. Never thought of that.
@@maxnaz47 You mine astroids in situ, and send the mass back that makes money and keep the rest with you. You don't ship things that you don't have to
When you brought up the concept of disassembling the moon to provide resources for a orbiting colony, in got me thinking. Using the entire moon would be of course, devastating to the earth, causing catastrophic geological upheaval. Even scaling back this idea, we are looking at using vast quantities of lunar resources to bring to earth and also to colonize the rest of the solar system. At what point does the removal of mass from the moon begin to affect the earth in any measurable way? Small but measurable changes to tidal forces, as an example. I know this might be seen as an infinitesimal issue and might take generations to cause any effect at all but it seems like it would be a fairly simple (for a mathematician, not me) calculation to perform and at least give us a clue about our impact. There was a point when previous generations (and even some still today) could not fathom humans having impact on earth's climate. I am not a tree hugger either, but I think our impact on other planets or moons is an ethics discussion that at some point will need to be addressed. Love your videos and hope that I am alive to see some of the future that you discuss.
Must admit this is a very interesting and thought provoking video for space travel, long time living, terraforming and mining mineral/precious metals on both inner and outer planets or moons/asteroids. Very well explained even for some one who has not even thought of any of this, also to those of us that have wondered about how/where or why concerning space travel and colonising other worlds.
I really wish we would industrialize moons, freedom from earth's gravity will allow us to be bigger machines that can be used for earth and space expansion.
hmm yeah the Moon should be like the industrial district of Earth and easier for big ships to take off..... if u can produce fuel
+pumpuppthevolume - fuel is no problem. There's some water on the moon, and water is unrefined, high grade rocket fuel. Plenty of air, water and rocket fuel up there, trapped in the surface gravel and especially in polar craters.
You won't need much fuel. A space elevator on the Moon is much easier than on Earth.
Even if you used rockets, you could also use skyhooks.
Bo Zo....oh yeah that's how we can do it .....but we will still need detailed surveys of those areas
BadBeardBill .......well I am not a fan of those ....I was thinking of more practical stuff in the close future
sombodi200 And we could just launch our waste products and pollution toward Venus, say, or the Sun.
Not like it'll be hurting any environments harboring life.
Let big industry pollute with impunity and there's no telling what it can accomplish.
if we use the moon for controversial experiments, particularly nano-tech, would we be worried about a Grey goo sencerio taking place there as much as we would here on earth?
Some illegal Grey scenarios already accounted by Andromeda council members, including their underground bases on the moon. Those Grey are back to their Zeta constellation, and forbidden to Sol due to controversial experiments and slave labor.
but moon dust can hinder the industrialisation of the moon since it is sharp enough to tear kevlar
Very impressed by the graphics! I think I'm going to be happy here!
I'm so happy I found this channel. After CR got canceled because of the pandemic, I had nothing to listen to during cooking and doing other housekeeping chores . You gave me something I enjoy way more :)
I can already hear the moon environmentalist coming.
Nothing lives there, it's arguably the perfect place to offload nearly all our polluting heavy industry, which could potentially take this planet back to pre industrial levels of pollution.
You cant go to the moon!
"words of Irwin Shapiro from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics indicate that the Moon is a real mystery for scientists.
“The best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error; the Moon does not exist. The Moon is bigger than it should be, apparently older than it should be and much lighter in mass than it should be. It occupies an unlikely orbit and is so extraordinary that all existing explanations for its presence are fraught with difficulties are none of them could be considered remotely watertight.”"
Most important lesson leaned from this video is Collect Underpants.
Sublime Thinker I believe that's the same reason people are buying bitcoin. :)
Imagine the size of O'neal Cylinder producing assembly lines O.O.
Your shows are really good at explaining how teachnical science aspects of life relate to our every day life. Thank you.
Personally I think the moon would be a learning and development curve for us before going to Mars. Perfect tech on the moon the use it in on Mars tried and tested. Plus the moon then is usable as the space gateway instead of building one in orbit of the earth. It would have most of what we need to build with and it has a lot less gravity than earth so obviously would need a lot less fuel than an earth launch. It's a sensible direction why waist money on something that would be made obsolete by technology over the decades after its completion. The moon base would be upgradable and large enough to make great real estate for industrial/colonisation which would relieve the earth of overpopulation.
From there to Mars then we have a true multi planetary race which is virtually impossible to wipe out even by natures standards.
Great vids Isaac really enjoy your work thanks
new subscriber, I love your content.
Question: wouldn't industrializing the moon, changing its overall mass and such affect the weather here on earth, tides and such?
I suspect so. Tides could be effected and its possible that the moon might start moving closer to earth more quickly, especially if you are shipping stuff to earth as well.
I think the whole point is what we're going to do after we destroy Earth, it will effect what's left but that's never stopped us before.
You guys are dumb? A few buildings is insignificant to the size of the moon. And we would use a lot of moon stuff
18:19 altho doing so would almost certainly destroy earth from messing with the tidal forces of such a short period of time lol also fish are going to have trouble...
You should do a Q&A episode.
Thank you for finally drawing the space colonizing/ underpants gnome analogy ...long overdo!
Isaac! Please don't ever stop creating these masterpieces!
*sees video is 25 minutes
Hey, look a short one!
Liked, Subscribed, and Commented on ☺
Greetings from Brazil: 22:22
Here we are! Loving Issac's work. Lol.
thanks for the tutorial.
I will make sure to put this into practice someday.
Another awesome video and love how the moon has so much potential for humanity.
i realy want him to say " Roger Rabbit Rarely runs races..... just saying
stop it please, please stop i cant, the way you exposed it is so funny stop pls.
Dead
Moon has 1/6 gravity. If that's good for manufacturing, then orbital factories where you can have any gravity you want, are even better. In one rotating station, you can have a zero G stockpile in the hub, a micro-G area for heavy transport, low-G factories, one-G crew sections, and even arbitrarily high-G areas if you wanted. Even better.
We don't need no stinking planets. (Or silly moons.) Space is the place.
But the moon has raw material, and unmatched orbital stability. And heaven help us if we get space espionage or even warfare, whether between space-faring nation-states or corporations, etc. Orbital factories would have little defense and need to be hardened against lots of threats. A factory in a moon crater or tunnel would be much better sheltered. Piracy developed right along European exploration overseas, I imagine the same might happen in space.
OP: Yeah. Planets and Moons aren't all that good for habitation.
They're great for resource extraction, of course.
And they'll be fairly well defended, if need be. Remember, they have to protect against potentially large asteroids. Gonna need some beefy lasers.
+Cuvtixo D - A lunar bunker might be tough enough to survive an attack, but it would have to be a real military bunker, not just a surface base. Otherwise it's probably about the same, except the moon is a more predictable target.
Probably you live in Cleveland or some place that's surely more vulnerable than an orbital station would be.
Whoever controls space can destroy any settlement anywhere anyway, on or in the Earth or wherever, so I don't see it as an additional problem.
+Cuvtixo D - orbital stability is good, but active station keeping and/or interplanetary propulsion is even better.
Let's do this...💪
5:52 it does make a very very nice staging post :) close but with a low gravity well
this was my first time to see this channel. Really enjoyed watching and learning about this fascinating topic. I am fascinated by the moon and spend many hours watching and studying it. I have seen many examples of structures on the moon so I think what you are talking about is already happening.