A very telling part of this story is when Amber was recording the phone calls with Scott. When Scott admitted to Amber that his wife was missing and there was a national search to locate her, Amber says Scott don’t you remember you told me that you lost your wife. And he paused and said well she’s alive. So that right there tells me that when he told Amber two weeks before Laci was murdered, that he lost his wife he meant that she died. Of course later in the conversation he tried to backtrack and say that there were many forms of losing your spouse. No Scott, losing your wife is a nice way of saying somebody has died. And that’s exactly what you meant.
This is disgusting. Did not shed a tear, was still in touch with amber frey, and lying to her. He is just one big mess, a liar, a narsacist, he is crazy and comes from a crazy family. Period
My thoughts are with Laci's family. To have to write victim statements, that's just torture. They've been through enough. I pray there's no retrial but I know if there is, he'll still be guilty.
I believe he did. Amber was a strong credible witness! She testified for the prosecution!. She told the truth when she was questioned. She was honest & told the truth that they had an affair, & Scott lied to Amber. It's awful that Connor never had a chance; I really hope that he doesn't get a new trial. He doesn't deserve it.
Amber Frye is a victim and from more than one perspective. She engaged in roulette. Was she threatened, rewarded, compensated? Regardless of the theatrics of her so called evidence, she failed to get him to confess the crime. But her performance overpowered any reasonable doubt and shored up the pathetic corrupt, failed investigation. No forensics, what can you do? No witnesses. Had to be awkward, embarrassing, foolish going to trial. Burden of proof is laughable. What's not disclosed here is more significant. Why was the body disposed of in this gangland fashion? Could not be found and shows up months later, same spot. With the tremendous history of bodies in the bay, this is absurd, laughable. Did this dork from SD do this, planned it all ahead of time, cut off her extremities, gutted her, butchered her and his baby, who some fks said he did not even want to touch? I guess nobody really cares what exactly happened to the "pregnant girl" and are contented to accept, go on with this farce. You can't make this shit up, seriously.
Amber Frye was not water boarded to find her true colors. It has not come to that yet. And she was merely lucky, SP was just some dumb dork Mama's boy, not manipulative enough. He was sincere in his weakness towards her and she was devious, a snitch. How proud. It may have cost her dearly in the aftermath. This pre course is predictable by LE, lacking any other option except using informants. The Spooks will tell you the best source of intell is often word on the street
He wasn’t found guilty just cause he had a GF on the side. He was found guilty cause they had actual evidence against him. Also the recent robberies were proven not related. Law enforcement literally couldn’t find a single person of interest other then Scott. Scott went to his missing wife and child’s candle light service. While there he called his mistress. He was laughing and told her he was at Time Square. I heard the phone call.
Florida Fam I agree with most of what you said, though you are wrong about Time Square. Scott actually told his GF that he was in Paris. Scott told so many lies it's understandable that people would get confused or forget. During that same call, he also claimed to be in Brussels.
wrong! not one factual piece of evidence! a legit robbery day of across street from lacis!! brother on phone w robber telling him about laci on phone! police already made up there mind! neighbors seen her that day too
Scott is absolutely guilty of murdering his wife and son. He is the only human being with the opportunity to do so. I believe he had a duty to care for his family so saying he didn't know of his family's whereabouts was an absolute deal breaker for me...from the beginning. I don't blame Scott's family for spending all of their resources attempting to clear him. Nobody wants to think they created a monster so understanding will take time.
NO, The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
AMERICAS MOST WANTED TIP, IGNORED BY THE MPD. Four days after Steven Todd and Glenn Pearce were arrested, America’s Most Wanted ran a story on Laci’s disappearance. An anonymous call came into their hotline. We refer to it as the AMW tip. The caller said he had a conversation with two men who were bragging about Laci’s murder. The second man was unnamed, but the tipster gave a description and knew where the second individual lived. It was reported that the first man said “when they did it they thought it was going to be just another murder case . . . now it’s a big case all over TV and news . . . and they are blaming the husband and they are not getting any attention.” went on to say how stupid everyone was. The caller went on to say that he knew where the first man lived with his mother; his mother has the same last name. The last name is worth mentioning because four days earlier, the Modesto Police had encountered the Mother. She was present at her neighbor’s home when police came looking for the Medina’s stolen property. There was a strong connection between the Doe family and burglar Steven Todd. Certainly, this would merit follow-up, especially since the AMW operator stated this caller was 100% sure. Unfortunately, the extent of their follow up was this: This tip was given to a Modesto police officer, the same officer that encountered the mother four days earlier. This officer drove to the sons house, which was one block away from where he had encountered the mother, four days earlier. The son was standing outside. The officer confirmed his identity and asked where he was on December 24th. He said he was “locked up.” The officer called the jail and a deputy confirmed that John Doe had been in jail on the 24th, so the officer did not ask any other questions. The tip did not say he had murdered Laci, the tip just said “they did it.” It is not clear at all who “they” are. However, the officer asked no more questions. The officer never asked why it would be reported that he was bragging about the murder of Laci Peterson; whether he knew anything about Laci’s whereabouts; or about his mother’s connection to the Medina burglary. It was recently verified the first man WAS NOT IN JAIL during December of 2002. The deputy that had confirmed he was in jail had used an intake document that only estimates an inmate’s jail stay, it was not updated once he was released. The MPD screwed up big time.
And he's the only person that had the motive to do it as well. It's clear from his behavior both before and after their disappearance that he wasn't interested in settling down for a family-devoted life. He felt that he needed to escape and he chose the deranged and horrific path.
@@Blarsen780 There was no motive. The prosecution even admitted Amber was not the motive. Couples they hung out with started having babies, Scott and Laci surprised friends when they reversed an earlier stance of not wanting children. Laci, who had had surgery years earlier and was left with one ovary, knew it would be difficult to conceive and methodically tracked her cycle. Richardson said she recalls Laci expressing frustration that Scott always seemed to be traveling at the wrong time, and it took some time before Laci was pregnant. By early June, she got the good news. She enrolled in a prenatal yoga course and attended Lamaze classes with Scott. They also got to work early on the baby's room. Consistent with the decorations for The Shack and with Scott's interest in fishing, the couple chose a nautical theme, even hanging a life preserver decoration that read: "Welcome Aboard." Brent Rocha confirmed that Scott did indeed plan to have a family, and was quite emotional about becoming a father: Mark Geragos: And also fair to say that she was very excited about the kid? Brent Rocha: Yes. Mark Geragos: Okay. And Scott was as well? Brent Rocha: Yes. Mark Geragos: When he talked about, when you talked to him, he would express the fact that he's, I mean he's a goal-oriented person; you heard that description earlier today. You would agreed with that, right? Brent Rocha: Yes. Mark Geragos: And is, one of his goals was to have a child and a family? Brent Rocha: Yes. Mark Geragos: Okay. And he told you that he was thinking about what kind of father he was going to be and he was crying and he said he was going to be great; isn't that what he told you? Brent Rocha: That's what he was saying. Sharon Rocha confirmed, on Larry King Live, that Laci told her Scott had changed his mind about having a baby shortly after they moved to Covena in October 2002: ROCHA: “that's when she told me that Scott had said that he didn't think he wanted to have children. Of course that concerned me because we'd had conversations before in his presence or they had had conversations in my presence about having children. KING: So then it shocked you? ROCHA: It did. It really surprised me. KING: But then she got pregnant. ROCHA: Well, then she went on to say that not only did she -- that he didn't think he wanted to have children, she also said that he didn't want to. So, I was -- I was really upset about that knowing that he knew how she felt about having children. And then it was about a month or so later, it was around Thanksgiving time she and I were in the kitchen preparing dinner when she told me that she's going to stop taking birth control pills in December. Well, that surprised me because it had only been a month ago that Scott didn't want to have children. So, we had a conversation about that and I said, "Are you sure? Are both of you absolutely sure because you can't put the baby back once he's here"? Well, it was an it at that time. It was nothing at that time. And she said, yes, that they had talked about it and they were ready that Scott was ready also. Greg Reed gave testimony about Scott's and Laci's relationship, and Scott's participation in Laci's pregnancy. HARRIS: You also, Kristen, your wife, became friends with Laci, is that fair? REED: All four of us met at the same time. HARRIS: And they became friends separate of you and Scott? Kristen and Laci became friends? REED: Yes, they did. HARRIS: And at some point you and your wife began a Lamaze class at your home, is that correct? REED: That is correct. HARRIS: And you asked Scott and Laci if they would like to join in the Lamaze class? REED: That is correct. HARRIS: And they agreed to do that, right? REED: Yes. HARRIS: Okay. During about a one month period, they came to your house on a weekly basis to participate in the Lamaze classes, is that right? REED: That's probably about right. About once a week. HARRIS: You got a chance to see them interact quite a bit during that, didn't you? REED: Yes. HARRIS: And your impression, from telling the police, your impression was that they were a very happy couple? REED: Yes. HARRIS: And, in fact, you told the police Scott treated her very, very well? REED: Yes. HARRIS: They both, I believe your quote to the police was they were both very excited about the baby coming, is that right? REED: That's what it appeared, yes. HARRIS: And you were called in an interview you did with the police, excuse me. Let me take that back. Do you recall an incident at one point where you were looking through a catalog called Cabella's catalog? REED: Yes, I remember that. HARRIS: What is the Cabella's catalog? REED: It's a hunting, fishing, outdoors-type of magazine. And equipment. HARRIS: And they actually sell kids' camouflage outfits, is that right? REED: In that magazine they were. HARRIS: In that particular one? REED: Yes. HARRIS: During that time you were looking at it, both you and Scott were going through the, the kids' section or the kids' outfits, hunting and fishing, or whatever outfits, and the two of you were talking and laughing about how much you couldn't wait to buy your kids those kind of outfits, is that correct? REED: I remember that clearly, that's correct. HARRIS: Okay. Scott was very excited about that possibility, wasn't he? REED: Yes.
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
It is disturbing that he tries to incriminate other people just to get freedom. Same with casey anthony better to say that someone else did it. Why incriminate yourself. He did it.
Scott tells Amber he lost his wife a couple of weeks before she went missing, and this would be his first Christmas without her. And, by christmas, Laci really was gone! On the day he said that to Amber he bought a secret boat no one knew about. He also made five anchors, four of which were never recovered. The one that they did have, didn't match the cement in the driveway, which is where Scott said he'd used the rest of the missing cement, proven in court. Laci didn't know about, nor had she ever been in the boat, yet, a couple of Lacis hairs were found, wound tightly in some pliers. Agreed to take a lie detector test, but backed out after his father advised him not to. Upon returning home, he immediately washed his clothes, ate, and took shower. After getting out of shower, instead of just calling Lacis cell phone one more time, he calls her mom and tells her Laci is missing. He told, at least, three people he'd been playing golf, before finally sticking to the fishing story. Speaking of fishing, Scott told the detectives that going fishing that morning had been a last minute decision. But, this was an obvious lie because he'd purchased a two-day fishing license dated for the 23rd & 24th, a few days before. Or, maybe he's just psychic, and predicted he'd be making that "last minute" decision! When he took the detectives to his warehouse, he led them to believe the power was out, when the truth was, only his office in the warehouse had lighting, but the warehouse, itself, was only lit by a sky light during the day. When he went to the station to answer questions, he was already refering to Laci in past tense. Saying, "Laci was pregnant." Shouldn't that be IS pregnant? It wasn't past her due date. He did the same thing in his interview with Diane Sawyer. By then, he'd been made aware he shouldn't do that, as he immediately corrects himself saying, "is amazing" after he'd said 'was'. A huge red flag for the detectives on the case. On the night of Dec 24th, the day Laci went missing, Scott was already inquiring about grief counseling for Lacis family. Really??? She's not even yet gone a full 24hrs! I've never heard of anyone doing that over someone being missing for only a few hours! It just seems like Scott knew she wasn't coming home. The next day, Scott called the detectives asking them if they'd be bringing in and using cadaver dogs. She hadn't even been gone a full 24hours, and, he is inquiring about cadaver dogs! Another huge red flag to the detectives working the case! He sold Lacis car while still missing, before her body was found. And, inquired about selling their home before she was ever found too! He even wanted to sell it with all their furniture! Supposedly, he doesn't know if Laci is dead or alive, but has no problem selling her car and their home, with all their stuff in it? He told lie after lie after lie. Of course the big, well known lie was when he called Amber from Lacis vigil. Right before, during, or after just doesn't matter, at all! His mistress should've been the last thing on his mind at any moment during that event. It was well known he didn't want children, and wasn't thrilled about Laci being pregnate. Even telling his sister-in-law he was hoping for infertility. Laci telling her mom Scott wouldn't touch her belly to feel baby kicking. He didn't participate in the searches for Laci, opting instead, to secretly go to the bay, park his car, and just watch the search that was going on in the bay. Instead of showing grief about his wife being missing he, instead chose to flirt with his sisters baby sitter. Offering to make her drinks he called, "flirtinis". The baby sitter was so weirded out by Scott, she left! In one of the recorded calls with Amber, Scott tells her that if the police find any evidence, he'd lose his freedom. Not a confession, but close enough! When the due date, of the birth of his missing baby came around, he didn't have a gathering of friends & family to remember Laci & Conner. No, he didn't do anything at all to remember them. And, that would've been fine, if he chose to do nothing, no problem. But, he DID choose to do something. Since that day was also Ambers Bday, Scott chose to celebrate it, by hiding a bag of jewelry and a CD, etc for Amber to pick up. It seems it was Amber he wanted to remember & honor, not his missing wife & baby. When a body of a baby washed ashore, and then a body of a woman who had been pregnant washed ashore shortly after, within just a couple of miles from where he says he was 'fishing', he never even called anyone about it to see if it was Laci. About a week or so later, he was caught trying to flee with just about everything he owned, BUT his golf clubs and golf shoes. I add that he didn't have his clubs & shoes because Scott tried telling the cops that he was just going to play golf, not flee! However, the list of things he had with him is just as long, if not longer than my list here. What avid golfer goes to play golf with everything he owns BUT his clubs & shoes? I could go on & on! I know there's more, but I'm drawing a blank on the rest. Can anyone else think of anything I've forgotten? Okay so, one or two things on this list would be maybe a coincidence. three or four things --- sketchy, but okay. All these things plus more --- he's guilty, guilty, guilty! And, I don't even have it all listed here.
Many men who murder their partners, families, have NPD. Machiavellian traits are likely too. One can pick it all apart…but you’re dealing with a person who doesn’t view people, the world, or themselves…in any way that can really be understood. It’s heartbreaking this exists in our world.
He didn't flee. He was arrested at the golf course where he was meeting his brothers and Father. A recorded phone call was played by the defense in court where Scott tells he doesn't want his picture in the media again. -He calls Laci's mom after checking the voicemail. - CALL TO SHARONS DISTASO: And can you tell the jury, just tell us what happened. ROCHA: When he called he said, "Hi, Mom." He said, "Is Laci there with you or over there?" And I said, "No." And he said that her car is there, was there in the driveway and the dog was in the backward with the leash on and Laci was missing. I remember telling him to call her friends to see if anybody had seen or talked to her that day..... -SELLING THE HOUSE January 14, 2003 First hint at selling the house Terri Western. WESTERN: Yes, I did. As I did every morning. I was either the first one or one of the first that had arrived. And Scott was there that morning, and he was visibly upset. So I sat down next to him while he was going through the e-mails on the computer. And I said, "Scott," you know, "Are you okay?" And he said no. He goes, "I need to talk to you about selling the house. I can't have Laci come back here." DISTASO: And what did you respond to him, if anything? WESTERN: I responded with, "Well, Scott, I understand. However, now is not the time nor the place to discuss this." DISTASO: And did he mention that to you again about selling the house? WESTERN: No, he did not. (Trial) No effort was made by MPD or by the Defense, apparently, to determine what upset Scott so much. Scott didn't mention selling the house again to Western. Instead, he turned to Brian Argain. January 22, 2003 Scott again inquired about selling the Covena house "Scott called Brian Argain to inquire about selling the house. Transcript The phone conversation lasted 4 minutes and was captured in one of the wiretaps. Scott asked Brian about getting together with him to discuss the possibilities. He wanted to put it on the market right away, as a furnished home, and wanted it kept secret from the media. Scott said, 'no way is Laci coming back to that place.' Brian said since LE had already searched the house, he didn't know of any reason why Scott couldn't sell it, but he would check for him. They arranged to meet for lunch the next day to continue the conversation. -WAREHOUSE *LIGHTING Scott said there was no *lighting. Not "Power". His warehouse didn't have working lights. Hence Brocchini used the lights from the cruiser. Brocchini was called out on his lie during trial when he admitted he was aware of the fax that was sent and the indicator lights on the electronics. Brocchini lied, NOT Scott. -Laci's Land Rover January 29th , Scott traded in their Land Rover for a 2002 Dodge Dakota pick up. We offer the following facts regarding the trade-in of Laci's car: Scott had asked several times for his truck to be returned to him (see Detective Grogan's testimony). It was not going to happen so Scott needed to make other arrangements because he needed a truck for work. The used, 2002 Dodge Dakota that Scott purchased on January 28th was worth less than the 2002 4x4 crew cab F150 the police had confiscated. The suggestion that Scott was uncaring and went to get a new truck while his wife was missing is unreasonable. Scott had a new truck before Laci went missing, but it was in police custody. Her car was traded in for the Dodge out of necessity. Couples they hung out with started having babies, Scott and Laci surprised friends when they reversed an earlier stance of not wanting children. Laci, who had had surgery years earlier and was left with one ovary, knew it would be difficult to conceive and methodically tracked her cycle. Richardson said she recalls Laci expressing frustration that Scott always seemed to be traveling at the wrong time, and it took some time before Laci was pregnant. By early June, she got the good news. She enrolled in a prenatal yoga course and attended Lamaze classes with Scott. They also got to work early on the baby's room. Consistent with the decorations for The Shack and with Scott's interest in fishing, the couple chose a nautical theme, even hanging a life preserver decoration that read: "Welcome Aboard." Brent Rocha confirmed that Scott did indeed plan to have a family, and was quite emotional about becoming a father: Mark Geragos: And also fair to say that she was very excited about the kid? Brent Rocha: Yes. Mark Geragos: Okay. And Scott was as well? Brent Rocha: Yes. Mark Geragos: When he talked about, when you talked to him, he would express the fact that he's, I mean he's a goal-oriented person; you heard that description earlier today. You would agreed with that, right? Brent Rocha: Yes. Mark Geragos: And is, one of his goals was to have a child and a family? Brent Rocha: Yes. Mark Geragos: Okay. And he told you that he was thinking about what kind of father he was going to be and he was crying and he said he was going to be great; isn't that what he told you? Brent Rocha: That's what he was saying. Sharon Rocha confirmed, on Larry King Live, that Laci told her Scott had changed his mind about having a baby shortly after they moved to Covena in October 2002: ROCHA: “that's when she told me that Scott had said that he didn't think he wanted to have children. Of course that concerned me because we'd had conversations before in his presence or they had had conversations in my presence about having children. KING: So then it shocked you? ROCHA: It did. It really surprised me. KING: But then she got pregnant. ROCHA: Well, then she went on to say that not only did she -- that he didn't think he wanted to have children, she also said that he didn't want to. So, I was -- I was really upset about that knowing that he knew how she felt about having children. And then it was about a month or so later, it was around Thanksgiving time she and I were in the kitchen preparing dinner when she told me that she's going to stop taking birth control pills in December. Well, that surprised me because it had only been a month ago that Scott didn't want to have children. So, we had a conversation about that and I said, "Are you sure? Are both of you absolutely sure because you can't put the baby back once he's here"? Well, it was an it at that time. It was nothing at that time. And she said, yes, that they had talked about it and they were ready that Scott was ready also. Greg Reed gave testimony about Scott's and Laci's relationship, and Scott's participation in Laci's pregnancy. HARRIS: You also, Kristen, your wife, became friends with Laci, is that fair? REED: All four of us met at the same time. HARRIS: And they became friends separate of you and Scott? Kristen and Laci became friends? REED: Yes, they did. HARRIS: And at some point you and your wife began a Lamaze class at your home, is that correct? REED: That is correct. HARRIS: And you asked Scott and Laci if they would like to join in the Lamaze class? REED: That is correct. HARRIS: And they agreed to do that, right? REED: Yes. HARRIS: Okay. During about a one month period, they came to your house on a weekly basis to participate in the Lamaze classes, is that right? REED: That's probably about right. About once a week. HARRIS: You got a chance to see them interact quite a bit during that, didn't you? REED: Yes. HARRIS: And your impression, from telling the police, your impression was that they were a very happy couple? REED: Yes. HARRIS: And, in fact, you told the police Scott treated her very, very well? REED: Yes. HARRIS: They both, I believe your quote to the police was they were both very excited about the baby coming, is that right? REED: That's what it appeared, yes. HARRIS: And you were called in an interview you did with the police, excuse me. Let me take that back. Do you recall an incident at one point where you were looking through a catalog called Cabella's catalog? REED: Yes, I remember that. HARRIS: What is the Cabella's catalog? REED: It's a hunting, fishing, outdoors-type of magazine. And equipment. HARRIS: And they actually sell kids' camouflage outfits, is that right? REED: In that magazine they were. HARRIS: In that particular one? REED: Yes. HARRIS: During that time you were looking at it, both you and Scott were going through the, the kids' section or the kids' outfits, hunting and fishing, or whatever outfits, and the two of you were talking and laughing about how much you couldn't wait to buy your kids those kind of outfits, is that correct? REED: I remember that clearly, that's correct. HARRIS: Okay. Scott was very excited about that possibility, wasn't he? REED: Yes.
@@riomekilo895 -Scott emotional : Okay. Now, did you also say, in your response to Mr. Distaso's questions, that you'd never seen him hysterical, but you had seen him cry, you had seem him being emotional after Laci was missing, isn't that right? GRANTSKI: Yes, I had. GERAGOS: On more than one occasion? GRANTSKI: Yes. GERAGOS: He was extremely emotional, especially for him, because you had never seen him emotional at all before that? GRANTSKI: That's true. . .GERAGOS: The comment was, if I've got it right, he's in the driveway, is he standing with a police officer? GRANTSKI: He came walking up as I was talking to the police, to where I was standing. GERAGOS: Okay. And you say, How was golfing? GRANTSKI: Yeah. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said, GRANTSKI: He said I didn't go golfing, I went fishing. Officer Spurlock: Officer Spurlock: I saw Mr. Peterson. He seemed concerned. He had a look of concern on his face. I think he maybe even had some tears in his eyes. But as far as a frantic behavior, I wouldn't claim. Just frantic concern. … Mark Mark Geragos: Did he appear to be upset to you? Officer Spurlock: Yes. I would say so. Officer Evers: Mark Mark Geragos: When you saw them, you saw that Laci's mom Sharon, you know who Sharon is; is that correct? Officer Evers: Yes, I do. Mark Mark Geragos: She was crying, and she was very, very upset, correct? Officer Evers: That's correct. Mark Mark Geragos: When so Scott, when he walked up, he appeared to be very upset; is that correct? Officer Evers: That's correct. Mark Geragaos: And the other family members, you described them as just concerned, correct? Officer Evers: Yes. Detective Grogan: Mark Geragos: Now the, did you look at any of the interviews that Ms. Rocha had given, for example, to the Today Show on December 30th in which she says mom, that she said that Scott said, "Mom, is Laci there"? Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before. Mark Geragos: Did you ever look at the January 14th Today's Show where she said "I just immediately, I knew she was missing"? Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before. Mark Geragos: Okay. That would have been the January 14th show would have been two days before she was told about the existence of Amber Frey, is that correct, or the day before? Craig Grogan: It would have been the day before, yes. Mark Geragos: And that, at least if the transcript's accurate, she's the one who said that she knew Laci was missing just by the panic rising in Scott's voice, correct? Craig Grogan: Yes, that's what it says. Amie Krigbaum (neighbor): Amie Krigbaum: So I mean he, he was distraught; it kind of made me a little distraught, so I didn't really know how to handle the situation, so Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. Amie Krigbaum: I just kind of took bits and pieces of it and didn't really know what to do. I shut the door and kind of asked Terra, Help him look, or, you know? Greg Reed (Scott’s friend): Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. What, let me, before I show you the report and refresh your memory, what did, what was Mr. Peterson's, how did he sound on the message? Greg Reed: The perfect word would be frantic. Stacey Boyers (Laci’s friend): Mark Mark Geragos: You got a call from Scott approximately what time? Stacey Boyers: 5:26. Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. You know that now because you looked at cell phone records? Stacey Boyers: My cell phone records, yes. Mark Mark Geragos: You didn't just, Stacey Boyers: Didn't just pull that out, no. Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, you get the call at 5:26. Was he upset? Stacey Boyers: Uh, yes. Lori Ellsworth (Laci’s friend): Lori Ellsworth: He had a different tone in his voice, yes. Pat Harris: He was panicked, wasn't he? Lori Ellsworth: Panic, maybe
@@jwait1496 awww! Poor you. You must hate this post, every time you see it. You're so desperate for people to believe the Peterson's narrative. Well, that's never going to happen.
I believe he is guilty, but there’s not one shred of evidence. However, the bodies did wash up where he was fishing. Amber Frey, having an affair is what did him in for murder
@sophie8394 It's not evidence against SP. The area of the bay was extremely shallow. How did the uterus 'tear' open over time? If so, why was there no animal feeding or any sign Conner was ever in the bay? Should we really believe Conner would make it through the rocks and so far up on to shore. The supposed track was a hazardous journey. Yet the only damage (a 'tear') was supposed to have been made by the police trying to pick it up. The cut or tear in the uterus makes 'coffin birth' impossible. The only ways in which a baby can be released from the mother is by birth or by C-section. Since testimony was offered that Laci didn't give birth to Conner, then we must assume that someone cut him from her living body. 27 days of searches before the bodies were even discovered. December 28, 30; Jan 8, 9, 11, 18, 24, 28; Feb 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 20, 21, 23, 26; March 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 26, 27, 29; Are we expected to believe miles and miles of waterways and shoreline were patrolled by police. They didn't even cordon off anything during the search days. LOL Conner could not have washed ashore from any direction under the conditions that existed on April 13. The water level produced by the 5.88 high tide simply did not produce a waterway to carry him to where he was found. And he was beyond the debris line, which means that he was not pushed back to where he was found by the breaking waves. The SF Medical examine told the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head, and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an Dr Cheng said there was no explanation for Laci's body being found where it was. There was no evidence in the truck. There was no evidence in the boat. There was no evidence in the home. Cadaver dogs never found scent where Scott was - the only good scents led away from his locations. The alleged weight used to submerge (32 lbs) Laci's body should have had the body return to the surface in a few days, yet it was never spotted. Laci vanishes Dec 24th with a Croton watch the same day as the burglary across the street. A Croton watch was pawned just days later.
@@sophie8394 Yeah, but I'm not her. She completely demolished you in every exchange i've ever read. You're sour, I get it. She's intelligent, she's informed, and has a life. You don't have any of those things. Your life is dedicated to phony TH-cam accounts and parroting complete losers on FB. Carry on, Ang D J.
@Sophie Medical examiner currents GERAGOS: Okay. Now, when you talked to Boyd Stephens, he also told you and he was the San Francisco, or still is the San Francisco Medical Examiner. He told you that in cases previously where bodies have bloated with decomposition, that they pulled as much as eighty pounds of weight up with the body surfacing in the Bay, correct? GROGAN: Yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And, once again, you gave him, and this would have been on April 2nd, of 2003. You gave him the hypothetical of the chicken wire, right? GROGAN: Yes, sir. GERAGOS: Okay. And he told you that the water flow southbound was at four knots, right? GROGAN: In one particular area we were talking about, yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And he also said that, in his opinion, thirty pound of weights would not likely be enough to cause a female of that weight, especially wrapped in plastic causing additional buoyancy in the plastic to immediately go to the bottom, correct? GROGAN: Yes, that's one of the things he said. GERAGOS: And he said victim would likely have traveled with the currents for a considerable distance before any exposed weights could catch something on the bottom, or the current would allow the object to stay in one place long enough for the weights to begin to sink in the mud. GROGAN: Yes. When talking about the Richmond Turning Basin area, there. GERAGOS: If it had made it to deeper waters, it's possible the body would still be in pristine condition, right? GROGAN: Yes, sir.
I was pregnant at the same time as Laci and my Kasey born 12/02/2002 n I always think about baby Connor and how big he will be today just like my daughter Kasey 😞 my prayers to the laci family 💜
Good. Put him in Gen pop. Maybe he'll get smacked around a bit. All he had to do was leave. But he had to kill 2 people. Lacy was DAYS away from giving birth.
Conner would have been just a little bit older than my daughter. I remember the joy of expecting her, setting up the nursery, wondering how life would be... It's heartbreaking he took that away from Lacey and her loved ones.
Actually if there were more involved they wouldn't turn on each other because they would be arrested themselves. It's like turning themselves in. Even is the award money is a lot they wouldn't get the money instead they would go the jail because the cops would figure out they we're involved themselves. Ain't nobody that stupid.
Yes that comment was so stupid ! I fad to fast-forward to make sure i understood right. couldn't belive it and that come from the investigator ?? Wow this guy dumb
The only evidence they have is his debonair. Numerous witnesses seen her after he left and there was a burglarized home across the street that same day. With all the media attention, the real killers would know exactly where to dump the bodies. Why would you tell the cops you were fishing at the same place you dumped the bodies ? Not smart .. you would have to believe that the bugulars took her , killed her and then planted the bodies where they knew Scott was fishing . If they were armed, you'd think they just shoot her at the scene . Why would you kidnap a pregnant lady? A lot of reasonable doubt in this case though , certainly "beyond reasonable" the man was convicted by Nancy Grace and the court of public opinion . He certainly deserves a new case , I'm 50/50 . It's better to free 10 guilty men than wrongfully convict 1 innocent man.. that's my view ...
@@tonyperrotti5049Those so called witnesses never testified to seeing Laci in court, so sightings of Laci can only be referred to as hearsay! YES, the house across the street was burglarised, but there was no break in at Laci's and Scott's house! The "he was framed theory" does not at all work for me, Scott's actions show a lot of premeditation. Telling Amber he was widowed-lost his wife just before Christmas, then going online to purchase the boat, and searching info about the tide and conditions in the bay. The fact that Laci disappears on the day he decided to go fishing, before turning up in the same place he goes fishing leaves no doubt in my mind. Apart from all of that! What innocent man continues to call their mistress and order playboy channels while their pregnant wife is missing? The burglars had nothing to gain by framing Scott. By the time Laci was found-Scott was the only suspect.
@@simcastpodvids the bugulars had everything to gain by framing him , they had to dump the body somewhere. His boat was extremely small. Did you see pics of the boat? It looks like a canoe..It would have been very difficult to put the body in the tiny boat without being noticed. I really do not know if he's guilty or not , but the lack of evidence is worrisome. She easily could have been abducted if she questioned the bugulars while walking her dog.
@@tonyperrotti5049 What did the burglars have to gain by framing Scott? They had 101 places to dump the body in Modesto. Laci wasn't a big person. She was actually petite, people talk about Laci as if she was a giant woman, when in reality she was a short Portuguese woman who could have easily fit in that boat.
Scott Peterson never realized that family and friends would react so quickly to mobilize to find Laci! He seemed shocked that so many would forgo their Christmas holidays to find Laci and Conner. I truly think he was stunned at the reaction because he didn’t really love her.
You’re right. It picked up so quick it was nationwide. He thought oh Modesto they’ll never find her and eventually they’ll think she died. But her soul never gave up. He’s where he needs to be and his life will be worst than prison if he gets out. He will be watching his back forever.
I agree and they're going to dump her body in the exact same place Scott went fishing 90 miles away, burglars don't do that. Did any other pregnant women or their children wind up on shore?
It NEVER ceases to amaze me when another "unhappy husband" pops up after killing his wife. I believe they do it cuz they don't want to pay alimony or child support. It's all about money.
I felt that she found out about his affair and told him she wanted a divorce and she would divorce rape him... probably told him he would pay heavily for 18 years of child support. I think that sent him over the edge.
Christina Roche she is insular. She has no conscience or care about what he did to Laci. She actually believes that Scott is the true victim. If you showed her footage of Scott getting rid of the body she would say that Scott has a twin and was framed.
@@aliciascott4299 IKR. Or she could add, that the pliers that held Laci's twisted hair, that was also found on his boat, got placed there by those burglars. Those ppl are sick! It's obvious, his family don't see any wrongdoings in him, but we can!
He was a cheater and liar not a killer. No evidence of doing so literally. He will get a new trail and he will walk free. The dumb cops who did not do their job should be shamed for this massive injustice. You'll all see....much the jury did not hear
Are you, Sophie, AKA Petelikedporn Patty Sullivan Anne Sull Kim L Slick Pete QUOTE " there's nothing I haven't reviewed. I've been reviewing it for more than 10 years. I'm not impressed by TH-cam legal experts. And for the 2nd time. RN did NOT co author a book. The fact you don't even know that tells me everything I need to know about your expertise. " FACT RN did co author a book called 'we, the jury'
You ran around telling people hundreds of people that Jackie, ( his deceased mother ) was a "liar". You said she needed to fill out CTR form for the $10,000. Truth CTRs are filed when a customer makes a currency transaction EXCEEDING $10,000, or for multiple transactions if the sum exceeds $10,000 in one day. That would make you the liar.
@@jwait1496 she was a liar. She also lied about what Peterson and Laci drove to Carmel. She also lied about walking around Carmel with Laci. Going up hills, walking on sand. She and Laci had vehicle access and could drive to access points in Carmel, by the beach, to shop etc. And she did lie about the money withdrawal, it was obviously so Scott could go on the LAM I know now you are Everett, Sumridge. I have never said RN didn't co author a book. I know she did. I read “We the Jury”.
@@petelikedporn6009 No Patty. You're misinformed as usual. Those were not lie. He wasn't running anywhere. He was on his way to the golf course, Patty. He was driving North, genius. Was he taking the scenic route to Mexico. The defense played the wire tapped recording from police where Scott specifically told John his brother that it's best he didn't play golf because the media were following him, and he didn't want another picture of him in the papers. I'm not Sumrige either, and I don't know anyone named "Everett". Keep guessing, fill your boots, Sophie.
@@petelikedporn6009 Why would Jackie take money from Scott's account to pay Scott? He didn't cash his pay check, wouldn't you think if he was going to flee, he would have made that a priority if he wanted cash to flee?
I don’t think for a second that Scott was a good, decent person, but I have doubts that he did it. Two things; how was he dumb enough to have his picture taken with his mistress with his pregnant wife at another party while being smart enough to murder an 8 month pregnant woman leave no evidence including no witnesses in broad daylight? And how did he dump her body overboard that small boat without it sinking? That would mean that their combined weight plus any weights/anchors attached would need to be concentrated in one area of the boat and then thrown over? I just don’t see how he could have done that and the prosecution didn’t prove it either.
Chris Watts murdered his entire family and left no evidence. You don't believe Peterson could put his wife's dead body in the back of his truck while loading patio umbrellas in broad daylight without being seen but think Laci could have been abducted in broad daylight on a populated street without being seen? 👌🥴 The state DID prove it. Obviously.
The MPD didn't care about the evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stephens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
@@wineasy9002 one piece of evidence plz? And you did know the neighbors across street got robbed that day right? That Lacey was seen walking her dog that day right? That the neighbors had to put their dog in the backyard after finding it wondering the neighborhood right? Again show me the evidence
@@SweetNSassy77 who says Laci was walking that day? Nobody. And why did scott say Laci is dead on December 9th? What does that mean to you? you need to know what premeditated murder is. you clearly don't know.
So what's the deal with the robbery across street? And lady down road prego said 2 guys tried to nab her before 10 that morning barney? Just wondering?
@@CountryBoy2280 wow that's some impressive grammar. No I wasn't there but I have studied this case since it began and I possess critical thinking skills. There's no way he didn't do it.
Wow! what an assumption. You think because there was a reward that means the criminals would have turned on each other. It’s like you’re using your imagination to justify your reasoning. There is no evidence. The only evidence is the location of the body which turned up months later after the area was thoroughly searched and broadcasted. You’re not supposed to use your imagination to conjure up a scenario in which he did it. You’re supposed to have evidence that he did it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Well the two men in the white van held her captive till she had to pee than killed her by everything ive read online i heard those two guys were already in prison i thought they would of died by now..and of course they wouldnt snitch on scott no.. They wont be accountable either so...
The meth head acquaintances of the burglars couldn't rat them out fast enough about the burglary to get their greedy little hands on the $1000 reward for the burglary. You think they would just stay quiet about the abduction and murder of a pregnant woman when there was $500,000 available?
@@sophie8394 really someone said years ago somewhere im a forum they saw her peeing on the aide of a road by a fence before she died.. Not making it up it juat wouldn't make sense that he actually did it himself i know they were the robbers but really could of been a set up all along.
@@sarahrayne4808 that someone was Tom Harshman. He didn't report this to police for 4 days. He was a former reserve officer who sees a pregnant woman being forced into a van and does NOTHING??? Sounds like a real stand up guy huh? This claim is unsubstantiated. The burglars were cleared. No connection to what happened to Laci.
Unfortunately yes. The initial reports said the 24th, while the cops and news media reported the 26th later. His defense lawyer and team discovered Brochinni had “lied by omission” in his reports and everything.
Even if it happened on the 24th, the Medinas left their house at 10:33 am which means it happened AFTER McKenzie was found...so that means there was no abduction.
@@UpChuckTheBoogie Sharon and the neighbors reported the truck being backed up to the house. Also, no one can see anything when the body is in the storage unit unless someone alive was locked in the storage unit, right?
@@UpChuckTheBoogie LOL. The truck destroyed the house, didn't you know? He actually ran over her with the truck. Good luck believing the criminal perpetrator!
They weren't credible. They claimed to have seen Laci in an area she was never known to walk and at a time when Scott's cell phone records prove he was still at home.
The detectives on Scott Peterson’s case from Modesto PD were pathetic, including this dude since i believe he was one of the two main detectives. Of course he’s going to say Scott is guilty and he was correct decades ago. Such BS. Swallow your pride and admit there is a reasonable doubt.
@@sophie8394 exact same question goes to you. You have the right to your opinion if you believe they were perfect. I have the right to my opinion that they were not.
@@utcougar what I know is that besides the MPD, 90 other LE agencies participated in this investigation including the FBI and the DOJ. To assume that the case was not adequately investigated and none of them knew what they were doing is ridiculous.
@@sophie8394 when did I mention others? I only mentioned Modesto PD for one. For two I commented on this particular detective and the other one from Modesto PD. I’m essentially commenting that when or why on earth would a detective who was on a case admit to having a reasonable doubt. Of course he’s going to say “no doubt Scott Peterson is guilty”
@@utcougar anyone who refers to these detectives as "this dude" and "the other one" obviously doesn't know enough to have an opinion about how they did their jobs.
The only thing I never understood about the case was the baby being outside Laci's body with tape placed over one ear and a noose around the neck. I can see Scott killing Laci, but honestly, that part of this trial will never stop haunting me. It doesn't make sense.
These are just a couple of examples of the lies being told by Janey Peterson and Scott's shady af attorneys. There was no tape on the baby's ear and no noose 🙄 He was tangled in debris as he floated to shore.
@@bethfinn370 that documentary was a disgrace. Created by the Peterson family and produced by one of Janey's best friends who is also a founding member of the Scott Peterson is Innocent fb group. It's full of lies, half truths and deliberately omits the evidence against SP. Sadly, it fooled a lot of people who don't know the facts.
The tape was wrapped around Conner's chest, passing under the right arm and over the left arm and looped around the neck with a knot and bow tie to the left...Conclusion: With all the other evidence that Conner did not wash ashore, the most likely scenario is that the twine was placed on Conner by human hands. It was not the cause of death, but served some other purpose. The failure of the State to identify the bugs, insects, algaes and dirt debris that were on the twine amounts to destruction of evidence which could have identified where Conner's body was during the interim between his death and being being placed on the Richmond Jetty.
Det. Jon Buehler is a very decent man. Scott was guilty, the real evidence was overwhelming, and Scott's lawyers were aware of, but didn't present, because they know it was not credible, most of the (false) sightings that are now allegedly "new evidence.". Through it all, Jon remained respectful to all parties including Scott, and always listened.
@@DocProcRealm I've seen every report. The one you've probably seen is the one with the dates entered by a county clerk listing the burglary as having occurred between the 24th and the 26th bc that's the dates that the Medinas were away. That is not the official charge.
It’s not just “1 person of authority”, it’s a whole new team that looks at the case once the trial is all said and done, to see if there were any interferences with giving the defendant a fair trial, if there were any other possible persons of interests, the process of the investigation, etc. Part of the findings and what’s being stated in his appeal was revealed in the Hulu series’ last episode of “The Murder of Laci Peterson.” Very interesting seeing all the stuff that new team came across.
The “problem” of the 1 juror (Richelle Nice) was that they said she lied on her survey to get on the jury, how much of that is true, we’ll see when she testifies. Her attorney got her a “deal” that she can testify with immunity from prosecution for whatever she ends up testifying.
The media has to double down on their touting of his guilt because they are the ones that convicted him. No main stream media will admit they did it wrong. It’s not about him, it’s about keeping appearances.
@@sophie8394 Petelikedporn Sophie VideoFanatic Patty Sullivan Anne Sull Lucy Ainsworth Kim L Rick Tavares Slick Pete 1. You ran around telling people hundreds of people that Jackie, ( his deceased mother ) was a "liar". You said she needed to fill out CTR form for the $10,000. Truth CTRs are filed when a customer makes a currency transaction EXCEEDING $10,000, or for multiple transactions if the sum exceeds $10,000 in one day. That would make you the liar. 2. When did Stacey Boyers, Laci's friend TELL YOU that Scott told her he was golfing on the evening of the 24th? I'm wondering if she would appreciate you publicly lying about her, since we both know she didn't testify to that. 3. You posted this lie on Facebook. """"He also lied about what she was doing when he got up. He told Mansfield that Laci was mopping at 8 am. Yet he told Brocchini that she was mopping when he left the morning of the 24th."""" Interesting you leave out this important part of the testimony where MANSFIELD clearly states '' He probably did. I don't remember exactly what it was." HARRIS: He said that she was mopping? MANSFIELD: Yes. HARRIS: Did he indicate what it was that she was mopping, or was going to mop? MANSFIELD: He probably did. I don't remember exactly what it was. So you're accepting MANSFIELD's statement as fact that Scott lied, when he doesn't remember what Scott said. Well done 👏. Keep the lies coming. You will never change. 4. ,"Laci could hardly walk, I can't see her obsessively cleaning. The house cleaner mopped the floors on the 23rd. Scott is the one who used the mop. Just like he was vacuuming obsessively in front of the washing machine on Christmas day."
Why would anyone accept someone being guilty when the evidence doesn't prove it. was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made. The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
Scott DID NOT Cap Size!! It’s physically impossible to throw 180 pound dead weight over a small boat without capsizing...... Even on stable solid ground you couldn’t throw 150 pound weight without falling over DUH!!!!
@@kmremseysmith4771 The judge will be receiving hundreds upon hundreds of letters if she hasn't already from people complaining he didn't get a fair trial.
@@sophie8394 of course it is. I'm 60 years old at 5' 7. In spite of that, I squat 425 pounds for sets. I could easily pick up 190 pounds and throw it into the water. People love to limit other people's abilities on their own inadequacies.
Lol this guy thinks Scotts life is going to be in danger in gen pop? Scott is a VERY well liked guy in prison. Even the guards like him. And he's not a pedophile, so...
The prisoners said Scott would be a trophy kill. I saw a documentary about it that talks specifically about Scott Peterson. The guard said the other prisoners will hurt him. The cop knows more than you think.
@@sophie8394 Can you imagine how many letters the judge has received that Scott didn't get a fair trial? Probably hundreds if not thousands. His supporters are desperate.
@@kurtenglund5753 Judge Delucchi has passed away but I'm sure he did at the time. The Supreme Court of California upheld his guilty conviction and affirmed the fairness of his trial in 2020 and the people who seem to think they know more than the SC is hysterical 🤣 They are desperate and delusional.
The golden boy thought he would get away with it. Wrong answer scotty. You could have divorced your wife but no. You were too greedy and selfish. So now you reap it.
There is no evidence he murdered anyone. The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
@@aok4418 He's not going anywhere. I can't wait to see if he gets put in regular population. I want to see him get whacked. The AB hates killers of women and children.
![จบจนได้ ! | Black Myth: Wukong #007 [ตอนจบ?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DSqvWndF0sw/mqdefault.jpg)
He is where he belongs. Only thing they could change is to place him with his brother from another mother Chris Watts.
A very telling part of this story is when Amber was recording the phone calls with Scott. When Scott admitted to Amber that his wife was missing and there was a national search to locate her, Amber says Scott don’t you remember you told me that you lost your wife. And he paused and said well she’s alive. So that right there tells me that when he told Amber two weeks before Laci was murdered, that he lost his wife he meant that she died. Of course later in the conversation he tried to backtrack and say that there were many forms of losing your spouse. No Scott, losing your wife is a nice way of saying somebody has died. And that’s exactly what you meant.
This is disgusting. Did not shed a tear, was still in touch with amber frey, and lying to her. He is just one big mess, a liar, a narsacist, he is crazy and comes from a crazy family. Period
My thoughts are with Laci's family. To have to write victim statements, that's just torture. They've been through enough. I pray there's no retrial but I know if there is, he'll still be guilty.
I believe he did. Amber was a strong credible witness! She testified for the prosecution!. She told the truth when she was questioned. She was honest & told the truth that they had an affair, & Scott lied to Amber. It's awful that Connor never had a chance; I really hope that he doesn't get a new trial. He doesn't deserve it.
Amber Frye is a victim and from more than one perspective. She engaged in roulette. Was she threatened, rewarded, compensated? Regardless of the theatrics of her so called evidence, she failed to get him to confess the crime. But her performance overpowered any reasonable doubt and shored up the pathetic corrupt, failed investigation. No forensics, what can you do? No witnesses. Had to be awkward, embarrassing, foolish going to trial. Burden of proof is laughable. What's not disclosed here is more significant. Why was the body disposed of in this gangland fashion? Could not be found and shows up months later, same spot. With the tremendous history of bodies in the bay, this is absurd, laughable. Did this dork from SD do this, planned it all ahead of time, cut off her extremities, gutted her, butchered her and his baby, who some fks said he did not even want to touch? I guess nobody really cares what exactly happened to the "pregnant girl" and are contented to accept, go on with this farce. You can't make this shit up, seriously.
Amber Frye was not water boarded to find her true colors. It has not come to that yet. And she was merely lucky, SP was just some dumb dork Mama's boy, not manipulative enough. He was sincere in his weakness towards her and she was devious, a snitch. How proud. It may have cost her dearly in the aftermath. This pre course is predictable by LE, lacking any other option except using informants. The Spooks will tell you the best source of intell is often word on the street
Yes, and Amber had the tapes of him lying.
John is amazing. Rest in peace Laci and Conner❤
Do Laci & Conner get a New Trial?!?!?!!
He wasn’t found guilty just cause he had a GF on the side. He was found guilty cause they had actual evidence against him. Also the recent robberies were proven not related. Law enforcement literally couldn’t find a single person of interest other then Scott. Scott went to his missing wife and child’s candle light service. While there he called his mistress. He was laughing and told her he was at Time Square. I heard the phone call.
@New Life New Rules Nope it is the truth!!!!
Florida Fam I agree with most of what you said, though you are wrong about Time Square. Scott actually told his GF that he was in Paris. Scott told so many lies it's understandable that people would get confused or forget. During that same call, he also claimed to be in Brussels.
Not Times Square, the Eiffel Tower. Listen to the phone call again.
wrong! not one factual piece of evidence! a legit robbery day of across street from lacis!! brother on phone w robber telling him about laci on phone! police already made up there mind! neighbors seen her that day too
@@simcastpodvids lies to his side piece
His sister in law is delusional.
Scott murdered Lacy and Connor.
@New Life New Rules Shut up.
@New Life New Rules truth. Accept it and move on.
@ChillVibesXxX anyone with a brain cell knows.
Georgia Really What Evidence is there that Scott Peterson Murdered Laci Peterson please let us all know the EVIDENCE!!!
@@joanmarie7631 you expect someone to explain 4 months of evidence to you? Do your own homework.
Scott is absolutely guilty of murdering his wife and son. He is the only human being with the opportunity to do so. I believe he had a duty to care for his family so saying he didn't know of his family's whereabouts was an absolute deal breaker for me...from the beginning.
I don't blame Scott's family for spending all of their resources attempting to clear him. Nobody wants to think they created a monster so understanding will take time.
NO,
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
AMERICAS MOST WANTED TIP, IGNORED BY THE MPD.
Four days after Steven Todd and Glenn Pearce were arrested, America’s Most Wanted ran a story on Laci’s disappearance. An anonymous call came into their hotline. We refer to it as the AMW tip.
The caller said he had a conversation with two men who were bragging about Laci’s murder. The second man was unnamed, but the tipster gave a description and knew where the second individual lived.
It was reported that the first man said “when they did it they thought it was going to be just another murder case . . . now it’s a big case all over TV and news . . . and they are blaming the husband and they are not getting any attention.” went on to say how stupid everyone was.
The caller went on to say that he knew where the first man lived with his mother; his mother has the same last name. The last name is worth mentioning because four days earlier, the Modesto Police had encountered the Mother. She was present at her neighbor’s home when police came looking for the Medina’s stolen property. There was a strong connection between the Doe family and burglar Steven Todd. Certainly, this would merit follow-up, especially since the AMW operator stated this caller was 100% sure.
Unfortunately, the extent of their follow up was this:
This tip was given to a Modesto police officer, the same officer that encountered the mother four days earlier. This officer drove to the sons house, which was one block away from where he had encountered the mother, four days earlier. The son was standing outside. The officer confirmed his identity and asked where he was on December 24th.
He said he was “locked up.” The officer called the jail and a deputy confirmed that John Doe had been in jail on the 24th, so the officer did not ask any other questions.
The tip did not say he had murdered Laci, the tip just said “they did it.” It is not clear at all who “they” are. However, the officer asked no more questions. The officer never asked why it would be reported that he was bragging about the murder of Laci Peterson; whether he knew anything about Laci’s whereabouts; or about his mother’s connection to the Medina burglary.
It was recently verified the first man WAS NOT IN JAIL during December of 2002. The deputy that had confirmed he was in jail had used an intake document that only estimates an inmate’s jail stay, it was not updated once he was released.
The MPD screwed up big time.
And he's the only person that had the motive to do it as well. It's clear from his behavior both before and after their disappearance that he wasn't interested in settling down for a family-devoted life. He felt that he needed to escape and he chose the deranged and horrific path.
@@Blarsen780 There was no motive. The prosecution even admitted Amber was not the motive.
Couples they hung out with started having babies, Scott and Laci surprised friends when they reversed an earlier stance of not wanting children. Laci, who had had surgery years earlier and was left with one ovary, knew it would be difficult to conceive and methodically tracked her cycle. Richardson said she recalls Laci expressing frustration that Scott always seemed to be traveling at the wrong time, and it took some time before Laci was pregnant.
By early June, she got the good news. She enrolled in a prenatal yoga course and attended Lamaze classes with Scott.
They also got to work early on the baby's room. Consistent with the decorations for The Shack and with Scott's interest in fishing, the couple chose a nautical theme, even hanging a life preserver decoration that read: "Welcome Aboard."
Brent Rocha confirmed that Scott did indeed plan to have a family, and was quite emotional about becoming a father:
Mark Geragos: And also fair to say that she was very excited about the kid?
Brent Rocha: Yes.
Mark Geragos: Okay. And Scott was as well?
Brent Rocha: Yes.
Mark Geragos: When he talked about, when you talked to him, he would express the fact that he's, I mean he's a goal-oriented person; you heard that description earlier today. You would agreed with that, right?
Brent Rocha: Yes.
Mark Geragos: And is, one of his goals was to have a child and a family?
Brent Rocha: Yes.
Mark Geragos: Okay. And he told you that he was thinking about what kind of father he was going to be and he was crying and he said he was going to be great; isn't that what he told you?
Brent Rocha: That's what he was saying.
Sharon Rocha confirmed, on Larry King Live, that Laci told her Scott had changed his mind about having a baby shortly after they moved to Covena in October 2002:
ROCHA: “that's when she told me that Scott had said that he didn't think he wanted to have children. Of course that concerned me because we'd had conversations before in his presence or they had had conversations in my presence about having children.
KING: So then it shocked you?
ROCHA: It did. It really surprised me.
KING: But then she got pregnant.
ROCHA: Well, then she went on to say that not only did she -- that he didn't think he wanted to have children, she also said that he didn't want to. So, I was -- I was really upset about that knowing that he knew how she felt about having children.
And then it was about a month or so later, it was around Thanksgiving time she and I were in the kitchen preparing dinner when she told me that she's going to stop taking birth control pills in December. Well, that surprised me because it had only been a month ago that Scott didn't want to have children.
So, we had a conversation about that and I said, "Are you sure? Are both of you absolutely sure because you can't put the baby back once he's here"? Well, it was an it at that time. It was nothing at that time. And she said, yes, that they had talked about it and they were ready that Scott was ready also.
Greg Reed gave testimony about Scott's and Laci's relationship, and Scott's participation in Laci's pregnancy.
HARRIS: You also, Kristen, your wife, became friends with Laci, is that fair?
REED: All four of us met at the same time.
HARRIS: And they became friends separate of you and Scott? Kristen and Laci became friends?
REED: Yes, they did.
HARRIS: And at some point you and your wife began a Lamaze class at your home, is that correct?
REED: That is correct.
HARRIS: And you asked Scott and Laci if they would like to join in the Lamaze class?
REED: That is correct.
HARRIS: And they agreed to do that, right?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: Okay. During about a one month period, they came to your house on a weekly basis to participate in the Lamaze classes, is that right?
REED: That's probably about right. About once a week.
HARRIS: You got a chance to see them interact quite a bit during that, didn't you?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: And your impression, from telling the police, your impression was that they were a very happy couple?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: And, in fact, you told the police Scott treated her very, very well?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: They both, I believe your quote to the police was they were both very excited about the baby coming, is that right?
REED: That's what it appeared, yes.
HARRIS: And you were called in an interview you did with the police, excuse me. Let me take that back. Do you recall an incident at one point where you were looking through a catalog called Cabella's catalog?
REED: Yes, I remember that.
HARRIS: What is the Cabella's catalog?
REED: It's a hunting, fishing, outdoors-type of magazine. And equipment.
HARRIS: And they actually sell kids' camouflage outfits, is that right?
REED: In that magazine they were.
HARRIS: In that particular one?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: During that time you were looking at it, both you and Scott were going through the, the kids' section or the kids' outfits,
hunting and fishing, or whatever outfits, and the two of you were talking and laughing about how much you couldn't wait to buy your kids those kind of outfits, is that correct?
REED: I remember that clearly, that's correct.
HARRIS: Okay. Scott was very excited about that possibility, wasn't he?
REED: Yes.
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
It is disturbing that he tries to incriminate other people just to get freedom. Same with casey anthony better to say that someone else did it. Why incriminate yourself. He did it.
Now his sister in law is doing the same thing.
@sophie8394 if I were the one burglar, who is still alive, I'd sue Janeys pants off.
Scott tells Amber he lost his wife a couple of weeks before she went missing, and this would be his first Christmas without her. And, by christmas, Laci really was gone!
On the day he said that to Amber he bought a secret boat no one knew about.
He also made five anchors, four of which were never recovered. The one that they did have, didn't match the cement in the driveway, which is where Scott said he'd used the rest of the missing cement, proven in court.
Laci didn't know about, nor had she ever been in the boat, yet, a couple of Lacis hairs were found, wound tightly in some pliers.
Agreed to take a lie detector test, but backed out after his father advised him not to.
Upon returning home, he immediately washed his clothes, ate, and took shower. After getting out of shower, instead of just calling Lacis cell phone one more time, he calls her mom and tells her Laci is missing.
He told, at least, three people he'd been playing golf, before finally sticking to the fishing story.
Speaking of fishing, Scott told the detectives that going fishing that morning had been a last minute decision. But, this was an obvious lie because he'd purchased a two-day fishing license dated for the 23rd & 24th, a few days before. Or, maybe he's just psychic, and predicted he'd be making that "last minute" decision!
When he took the detectives to his warehouse, he led them to believe the power was out, when the truth was, only his office in the warehouse had lighting, but the warehouse, itself, was only lit by a sky light during the day.
When he went to the station to answer questions, he was already refering to Laci in past tense. Saying, "Laci was pregnant." Shouldn't that be IS pregnant? It wasn't past her due date. He did the same thing in his interview with Diane Sawyer. By then, he'd been made aware he shouldn't do that, as he immediately corrects himself saying, "is amazing" after he'd said 'was'. A huge red flag for the detectives on the case.
On the night of Dec 24th, the day Laci went missing, Scott was already inquiring about grief counseling for Lacis family. Really??? She's not even yet gone a full 24hrs! I've never heard of anyone doing that over someone being missing for only a few hours! It just seems like Scott knew she wasn't coming home.
The next day, Scott called the detectives asking them if they'd be bringing in and using cadaver dogs. She hadn't even been gone a full 24hours, and, he is inquiring about cadaver dogs! Another huge red flag to the detectives working the case!
He sold Lacis car while still missing, before her body was found. And, inquired about selling their home before she was ever found too! He even wanted to sell it with all their furniture! Supposedly, he doesn't know if Laci is dead or alive, but has no problem selling her car and their home, with all their stuff in it?
He told lie after lie after lie. Of course the big, well known lie was when he called Amber from Lacis vigil. Right before, during, or after just doesn't matter, at all! His mistress should've been the last thing on his mind at any moment during that event.
It was well known he didn't want children, and wasn't thrilled about Laci being pregnate. Even telling his sister-in-law he was hoping for infertility. Laci telling her mom Scott wouldn't touch her belly to feel baby kicking.
He didn't participate in the searches for Laci, opting instead, to secretly go to the bay, park his car, and just watch the search that was going on in the bay.
Instead of showing grief about his wife being missing he, instead chose to flirt with his sisters baby sitter. Offering to make her drinks he called, "flirtinis". The baby sitter was so weirded out by Scott, she left!
In one of the recorded calls with Amber, Scott tells her that if the police find any evidence, he'd lose his freedom. Not a confession, but close enough!
When the due date, of the birth of his missing baby came around, he didn't have a gathering of friends & family to remember Laci & Conner. No, he didn't do anything at all to remember them. And, that would've been fine, if he chose to do nothing, no problem. But, he DID choose to do something. Since that day was also Ambers Bday, Scott chose to celebrate it, by hiding a bag of jewelry and a CD, etc for Amber to pick up. It seems it was Amber he wanted to remember & honor, not his missing wife & baby.
When a body of a baby washed ashore, and then a body of a woman who had been pregnant washed ashore shortly after, within just a couple of miles from where he says he was 'fishing', he never even called anyone about it to see if it was Laci.
About a week or so later, he was caught trying to flee with just about everything he owned, BUT his golf clubs and golf shoes. I add that he didn't have his clubs & shoes because Scott tried telling the cops that he was just going to play golf, not flee! However, the list of things he had with him is just as long, if not longer than my list here. What avid golfer goes to play golf with everything he owns BUT his clubs & shoes?
I could go on & on! I know there's more, but I'm drawing a blank on the rest. Can anyone else think of anything I've forgotten?
Okay so, one or two things on this list would be maybe a coincidence. three or four things --- sketchy, but okay.
All these things plus more --- he's guilty, guilty, guilty! And, I don't even have it all listed here.
Many men who murder their partners, families, have NPD. Machiavellian traits are likely too.
One can pick it all apart…but you’re dealing with a person who doesn’t view people, the world, or themselves…in any way that can really be understood.
It’s heartbreaking this exists in our world.
Thank you
He didn't flee.
He was arrested at the golf course where he was meeting his brothers and Father. A recorded phone call was played by the defense in court where Scott tells he doesn't want his picture in the media again.
-He calls Laci's mom after checking the voicemail.
- CALL TO SHARONS
DISTASO: And can you tell the jury, just tell us what happened.
ROCHA: When he called he said, "Hi, Mom." He said, "Is Laci there with you or over there?" And I said, "No." And he said that her car is there, was there in the driveway and the dog was in the backward with the leash on and Laci was missing. I remember telling him to call her friends to see if anybody had seen or talked to her that day.....
-SELLING THE HOUSE
January 14, 2003 First hint at selling the house
Terri Western.
WESTERN: Yes, I did. As I did every morning. I was either the first one or one of the first that had arrived. And Scott was there that morning, and he was visibly upset. So I sat down next to him while he was going through the e-mails on the computer. And I said, "Scott," you know, "Are you okay?" And he said no. He goes, "I need to talk to you about selling the house. I can't have Laci come back here."
DISTASO: And what did you respond to him, if anything?
WESTERN: I responded with, "Well, Scott, I understand. However, now is not the time nor the place to discuss this."
DISTASO: And did he mention that to you again about selling the house?
WESTERN: No, he did not.
(Trial)
No effort was made by MPD or by the Defense, apparently, to determine what upset Scott so much. Scott didn't mention selling the house again to Western. Instead, he turned to Brian Argain.
January 22, 2003 Scott again inquired about selling the Covena house
"Scott called Brian Argain to inquire about selling the house. Transcript The phone conversation lasted 4 minutes and was captured in one of the wiretaps. Scott asked Brian about getting together with him to discuss the possibilities. He wanted to put it on the market right away, as a furnished home, and wanted it kept secret from the media. Scott said, 'no way is Laci coming back to that place.' Brian said since LE had already searched the house, he didn't know of any reason why Scott couldn't sell it, but he would check for him. They arranged to meet for lunch the next day to continue the conversation.
-WAREHOUSE *LIGHTING
Scott said there was no *lighting. Not "Power". His warehouse didn't have working lights. Hence Brocchini used the lights from the cruiser. Brocchini was called out on his lie during trial when he admitted he was aware of the fax that was sent and the indicator lights on the electronics. Brocchini lied, NOT Scott.
-Laci's Land Rover
January 29th , Scott traded in their Land Rover for a 2002 Dodge Dakota pick up. We offer the following facts regarding the trade-in of Laci's car:
Scott had asked several times for his truck to be returned to him (see Detective Grogan's testimony). It was not going to happen so Scott needed to make other arrangements because he needed a truck for work.
The used, 2002 Dodge Dakota that Scott purchased on January 28th was worth less than the 2002 4x4 crew cab F150 the police had confiscated. The suggestion that Scott was uncaring and went to get a new truck while his wife was missing is unreasonable. Scott had a new truck before Laci went missing, but it was in police custody. Her car was traded in for the Dodge out of necessity.
Couples they hung out with started having babies, Scott and Laci surprised friends when they reversed an earlier stance of not wanting children. Laci, who had had surgery years earlier and was left with one ovary, knew it would be difficult to conceive and methodically tracked her cycle. Richardson said she recalls Laci expressing frustration that Scott always seemed to be traveling at the wrong time, and it took some time before Laci was pregnant.
By early June, she got the good news. She enrolled in a prenatal yoga course and attended Lamaze classes with Scott.
They also got to work early on the baby's room. Consistent with the decorations for The Shack and with Scott's interest in fishing, the couple chose a nautical theme, even hanging a life preserver decoration that read: "Welcome Aboard."
Brent Rocha confirmed that Scott did indeed plan to have a family, and was quite emotional about becoming a father:
Mark Geragos: And also fair to say that she was very excited about the kid?
Brent Rocha: Yes.
Mark Geragos: Okay. And Scott was as well?
Brent Rocha: Yes.
Mark Geragos: When he talked about, when you talked to him, he would express the fact that he's, I mean he's a goal-oriented person; you heard that description earlier today. You would agreed with that, right?
Brent Rocha: Yes.
Mark Geragos: And is, one of his goals was to have a child and a family?
Brent Rocha: Yes.
Mark Geragos: Okay. And he told you that he was thinking about what kind of father he was going to be and he was crying and he said he was going to be great; isn't that what he told you?
Brent Rocha: That's what he was saying.
Sharon Rocha confirmed, on Larry King Live, that Laci told her Scott had changed his mind about having a baby shortly after they moved to Covena in October 2002:
ROCHA: “that's when she told me that Scott had said that he didn't think he wanted to have children. Of course that concerned me because we'd had conversations before in his presence or they had had conversations in my presence about having children.
KING: So then it shocked you?
ROCHA: It did. It really surprised me.
KING: But then she got pregnant.
ROCHA: Well, then she went on to say that not only did she -- that he didn't think he wanted to have children, she also said that he didn't want to. So, I was -- I was really upset about that knowing that he knew how she felt about having children.
And then it was about a month or so later, it was around Thanksgiving time she and I were in the kitchen preparing dinner when she told me that she's going to stop taking birth control pills in December. Well, that surprised me because it had only been a month ago that Scott didn't want to have children.
So, we had a conversation about that and I said, "Are you sure? Are both of you absolutely sure because you can't put the baby back once he's here"? Well, it was an it at that time. It was nothing at that time. And she said, yes, that they had talked about it and they were ready that Scott was ready also.
Greg Reed gave testimony about Scott's and Laci's relationship, and Scott's participation in Laci's pregnancy.
HARRIS: You also, Kristen, your wife, became friends with Laci, is that fair?
REED: All four of us met at the same time.
HARRIS: And they became friends separate of you and Scott? Kristen and Laci became friends?
REED: Yes, they did.
HARRIS: And at some point you and your wife began a Lamaze class at your home, is that correct?
REED: That is correct.
HARRIS: And you asked Scott and Laci if they would like to join in the Lamaze class?
REED: That is correct.
HARRIS: And they agreed to do that, right?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: Okay. During about a one month period, they came to your house on a weekly basis to participate in the Lamaze classes, is that right?
REED: That's probably about right. About once a week.
HARRIS: You got a chance to see them interact quite a bit during that, didn't you?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: And your impression, from telling the police, your impression was that they were a very happy couple?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: And, in fact, you told the police Scott treated her very, very well?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: They both, I believe your quote to the police was they were both very excited about the baby coming, is that right?
REED: That's what it appeared, yes.
HARRIS: And you were called in an interview you did with the police, excuse me. Let me take that back. Do you recall an incident at one point where you were looking through a catalog called Cabella's catalog?
REED: Yes, I remember that.
HARRIS: What is the Cabella's catalog?
REED: It's a hunting, fishing, outdoors-type of magazine. And equipment.
HARRIS: And they actually sell kids' camouflage outfits, is that right?
REED: In that magazine they were.
HARRIS: In that particular one?
REED: Yes.
HARRIS: During that time you were looking at it, both you and Scott were going through the, the kids' section or the kids' outfits,
hunting and fishing, or whatever outfits, and the two of you were talking and laughing about how much you couldn't wait to buy your kids those kind of outfits, is that correct?
REED: I remember that clearly, that's correct.
HARRIS: Okay. Scott was very excited about that possibility, wasn't he?
REED: Yes.
@@riomekilo895 -Scott emotional
: Okay. Now, did you also say, in your response to Mr. Distaso's questions, that you'd never seen him hysterical, but you had seen him cry, you had seem him being emotional after Laci was missing, isn't that right?
GRANTSKI: Yes, I had.
GERAGOS: On more than one occasion?
GRANTSKI: Yes.
GERAGOS: He was extremely emotional, especially for him, because you had never seen him emotional at all before that?
GRANTSKI: That's true.
.
.GERAGOS: The comment was, if I've got it right, he's in the driveway, is he standing with a police officer?
GRANTSKI: He came walking up as I was talking to the police, to where I was standing.
GERAGOS: Okay. And you say, How was golfing?
GRANTSKI: Yeah.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he said,
GRANTSKI: He said I didn't go golfing, I went fishing.
Officer Spurlock:
Officer Spurlock: I saw Mr. Peterson. He seemed concerned. He had a look of concern on his face. I think he maybe even had some tears in his eyes. But as far as a frantic behavior, I wouldn't claim. Just frantic concern.
…
Mark Mark Geragos: Did he appear to be upset to you?
Officer Spurlock: Yes. I would say so.
Officer Evers:
Mark Mark Geragos: When you saw them, you saw that Laci's mom Sharon, you know who Sharon is; is that correct?
Officer Evers: Yes, I do.
Mark Mark Geragos: She was crying, and she was very, very upset, correct?
Officer Evers: That's correct.
Mark Mark Geragos: When so Scott, when he walked up, he appeared to be very upset; is that correct?
Officer Evers: That's correct.
Mark Geragaos: And the other family members, you described them as just concerned, correct?
Officer Evers: Yes.
Detective Grogan:
Mark Geragos: Now the, did you look at any of the interviews that Ms. Rocha had given, for example, to the Today Show on December 30th in which she says mom, that she said that Scott said, "Mom, is Laci there"?
Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before.
Mark Geragos: Did you ever look at the January 14th Today's Show where she said "I just immediately, I knew she was missing"?
Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before.
Mark Geragos: Okay. That would have been the January 14th show would have been two days before she was told about the existence of Amber Frey, is that correct, or the day before?
Craig Grogan: It would have been the day before, yes.
Mark Geragos: And that, at least if the transcript's accurate, she's the one who said that she knew Laci was missing just by the panic rising in Scott's voice, correct?
Craig Grogan: Yes, that's what it says.
Amie Krigbaum (neighbor):
Amie Krigbaum: So I mean he, he was distraught; it kind of made me a little distraught, so I didn't really know how to handle the situation, so
Prosecutor Distaso: Okay.
Amie Krigbaum: I just kind of took bits and pieces of it and didn't really know what to do. I shut the door and kind of asked Terra, Help him look, or, you know?
Greg Reed (Scott’s friend):
Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. What, let me, before I show you the report and refresh your memory, what did, what was Mr. Peterson's, how did he sound on the message?
Greg Reed: The perfect word would be frantic.
Stacey Boyers (Laci’s friend):
Mark Mark Geragos: You got a call from Scott approximately what time?
Stacey Boyers: 5:26.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. You know that now because you looked at cell phone records?
Stacey Boyers: My cell phone records, yes.
Mark Mark Geragos: You didn't just,
Stacey Boyers: Didn't just pull that out, no.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, you get the call at 5:26. Was he upset?
Stacey Boyers: Uh, yes.
Lori Ellsworth (Laci’s friend):
Lori Ellsworth: He had a different tone in his voice, yes.
Pat Harris: He was panicked, wasn't he?
Lori Ellsworth: Panic, maybe
@@jwait1496 awww! Poor you. You must hate this post, every time you see it. You're so desperate for people to believe the Peterson's narrative. Well, that's never going to happen.
I believe he is guilty, but there’s not one shred of evidence. However, the bodies did wash up where he was fishing. Amber Frey, having an affair is what did him in for murder
The bodies washing up where he was 'fishing' is evidence 😂
@sophie8394 It's not evidence against SP. The area of the bay was extremely shallow. How did the uterus 'tear' open over time? If so, why was there no animal feeding or any sign Conner was ever in the bay? Should we really believe Conner would make it through the rocks and so far up on to shore. The supposed track was a hazardous journey. Yet the only damage (a 'tear') was supposed to have been made by the police trying to pick it up.
The cut or tear in the uterus makes 'coffin birth' impossible. The only ways in which a baby can be released from the mother is by birth or by C-section. Since testimony was offered that Laci didn't give birth to Conner, then we must assume that someone cut him from her living body.
27 days of searches before the bodies were even discovered.
December 28, 30; Jan 8, 9, 11, 18, 24, 28; Feb 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 20, 21, 23, 26; March 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 26, 27, 29;
Are we expected to believe miles and miles of waterways and shoreline were patrolled by police. They didn't even cordon off anything during the search days. LOL
Conner could not have washed ashore from any direction under the conditions that existed on April 13. The water level produced by the 5.88 high tide simply did not produce a waterway to carry him to where he was found. And he was beyond the debris line, which means that he was not pushed back to where he was found by the breaking waves.
The SF Medical examine told the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head, and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an
Dr Cheng said there was no explanation for Laci's body being found where it was.
There was no evidence in the truck.
There was no evidence in the boat.
There was no evidence in the home.
Cadaver dogs never found scent where Scott was - the only good scents led away from his locations.
The alleged weight used to submerge (32 lbs) Laci's body should have had the body return to the surface in a few days, yet it was never spotted.
Laci vanishes Dec 24th with a Croton watch the same day as the burglary across the street. A Croton watch was pawned just days later.
@@aok4418 sure Kathy 👌🥴
@@sophie8394 Yeah, but I'm not her. She completely demolished you in every exchange i've ever read. You're sour, I get it. She's intelligent, she's informed, and has a life. You don't have any of those things. Your life is dedicated to phony TH-cam accounts and parroting complete losers on FB. Carry on, Ang D J.
@Sophie
Medical examiner currents
GERAGOS: Okay. Now, when you talked to Boyd Stephens, he also told you and he was the San Francisco, or still is the San Francisco Medical Examiner. He told you that in cases previously where bodies have bloated with decomposition, that they pulled as much as eighty pounds of weight up with the body surfacing in the Bay, correct?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: Okay. And, once again, you gave him, and this would have been on April 2nd, of 2003. You gave him the hypothetical of the chicken wire, right?
GROGAN: Yes, sir.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he told you that the water flow southbound was at four knots, right?
GROGAN: In one particular area we were talking about, yes.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he also said that, in his opinion, thirty pound of weights would not likely be enough to cause a female of that weight, especially wrapped in plastic causing additional buoyancy in the plastic to immediately go to the bottom, correct?
GROGAN: Yes, that's one of the things he said.
GERAGOS: And he said victim would likely have traveled with the currents for a considerable distance before any exposed weights could catch something on the bottom, or the current would allow the object to stay in one place long enough for the weights to begin to sink in the mud.
GROGAN: Yes. When talking about the Richmond Turning Basin area, there.
GERAGOS: If it had made it to deeper waters, it's possible the body would still be in pristine condition, right?
GROGAN: Yes, sir.
we can only hope that prison justice will prevail.
I was pregnant at the same time as Laci and my Kasey born 12/02/2002 n I always think about baby Connor and how big he will be today just like my daughter Kasey 😞 my prayers to the laci family 💜
I was pregnant w my middle son too! He was born March of 2003. I followed this closely. Thank God for Laci's family a new trial will not be happening.
I was pregnant too my daughter was born 7/9/03. 2024 she will be 21. RIP Laci and. Connor
He is guilty! People who think differently are wrong.
People who think differently are informed and intelligent.
@@aok4418 hi janey peterson. please don't close your face with your hair from now on, and don't be blind to the facts. your scott is guilty.
@@aok4418 you need some glasses to see the facts
@@aok4418 scott and you need each other
@@wineasy9002 Wow, you really need some literacy lessons.
Good. Put him in Gen pop. Maybe he'll get smacked around a bit. All he had to do was leave. But he had to kill 2 people. Lacy was DAYS away from giving birth.
Conner would have been just a little bit older than my daughter. I remember the joy of expecting her, setting up the nursery, wondering how life would be... It's heartbreaking he took that away from Lacey and her loved ones.
I would never feel sorry for his amily they are still saying he did not do it. Oh PLEASE
How is she missing before she was missing.
Actually if there were more involved they wouldn't turn on each other because they would be arrested themselves. It's like turning themselves in. Even is the award money is a lot they wouldn't get the money instead they would go the jail because the cops would figure out they we're involved themselves. Ain't nobody that stupid.
Yes that comment was so stupid ! I fad to fast-forward to make sure i understood right. couldn't belive it and that come from the investigator ?? Wow this guy dumb
Of course he's guilty!
Yes he is.
The only evidence they have is his debonair. Numerous witnesses seen her after he left and there was a burglarized home across the street that same day. With all the media attention, the real killers would know exactly where to dump the bodies. Why would you tell the cops you were fishing at the same place you dumped the bodies ? Not smart .. you would have to believe that the bugulars took her , killed her and then planted the bodies where they knew Scott was fishing . If they were armed, you'd think they just shoot her at the scene . Why would you kidnap a pregnant lady? A lot of reasonable doubt in this case though , certainly "beyond reasonable" the man was convicted by Nancy Grace and the court of public opinion . He certainly deserves a new case , I'm 50/50 . It's better to free 10 guilty men than wrongfully convict 1 innocent man.. that's my view ...
@@tonyperrotti5049Those so called witnesses never testified to seeing Laci in court, so sightings of Laci can only be referred to as hearsay! YES, the house across the street was burglarised, but there was no break in at Laci's and Scott's house! The "he was framed theory" does not at all work for me, Scott's actions show a lot of premeditation.
Telling Amber he was widowed-lost his wife just before Christmas, then going online to purchase the boat, and searching info about the tide and conditions in the bay. The fact that Laci disappears on the day he decided to go fishing, before turning up in the same place he goes fishing leaves no doubt in my mind.
Apart from all of that! What innocent man continues to call their mistress and order playboy channels while their pregnant wife is missing? The burglars had nothing to gain by framing Scott. By the time Laci was found-Scott was the only suspect.
@@simcastpodvids the bugulars had everything to gain by framing him , they had to dump the body somewhere. His boat was extremely small. Did you see pics of the boat? It looks like a canoe..It would have been very difficult to put the body in the tiny boat without being noticed. I really do not know if he's guilty or not , but the lack of evidence is worrisome. She easily could have been abducted if she questioned the bugulars while walking her dog.
@@tonyperrotti5049 What did the burglars have to gain by framing Scott? They had 101 places to dump the body in Modesto. Laci wasn't a big person. She was actually petite, people talk about Laci as if she was a giant woman, when in reality she was a short Portuguese woman who could have easily fit in that boat.
Scott Peterson never realized that family and friends would react so quickly to mobilize to find Laci! He seemed shocked that so many would forgo their Christmas holidays to find Laci and Conner. I truly think he was stunned at the reaction because he didn’t really love her.
You’re right. It picked up so quick it was nationwide. He thought oh Modesto they’ll never find her and eventually they’ll think she died. But her soul never gave up. He’s where he needs to be and his life will be worst than prison if he gets out. He will be watching his back forever.
A robber don’t have the time to drove 90 miles to dump her body…
Yep. And the chances of a stranger killing a pregnant woman is so much less than a close warped loved one.
The burglars didn't even own a car 😒
Exactly. Plus they would have to own a boat, or spend money to rent or buy a boat, just to get rid of her body. It makes zero sense.
@@minacerra did you see how many other women pregnant at that were killed in that area?
I agree and they're going to dump her body in the exact same place Scott went fishing 90 miles away, burglars don't do that. Did any other pregnant women or their children wind up on shore?
I'm not saying he did or did it but there was No evidence that he did!
It NEVER ceases to amaze me when another "unhappy husband" pops up after killing his wife. I believe they do it cuz they don't want to pay alimony or child support. It's all about money.
I agree.
I felt that she found out about his affair and told him she wanted a divorce and she would divorce rape him... probably told him he would pay heavily for 18 years of child support. I think that sent him over the edge.
@@pillowbugg
What is divorce rape? Never heard of that!?!
@@pillowbugg Should have gotten divorced.. Could've done things rt and gotten divorced amicably and then dated
@@FLo-jc7ig Taking him to the cleaners maybe.
His sister-in-law is silly as if burglars would rob a house and then go to the bother miles away to get rid of the body RIP IN PEACE LACEY.
Every sociopath has their flying monkeys. She is it for Scott. They blindly believe anything.
Christina Roche she is insular. She has no conscience or care about what he did to Laci. She actually believes that Scott is the true victim. If you showed her footage of Scott getting rid of the body she would say that Scott has a twin and was framed.
@@simcastpodvids You are so right. I would say that he is manipulating people families and friends his whole life. should never be off death row.
@@christinaroche9616 Sociopaths USE.. He uses Janey to puppet his story.. And she uses his high profile case for attention..
@@aliciascott4299 IKR. Or she could add, that the pliers that held Laci's twisted hair, that was also found on his boat, got placed there by those burglars. Those ppl are sick! It's obvious, his family don't see any wrongdoings in him, but we can!
Put the monster in general population, and let him take his chances!
of course, he is guilty. back for 5 minutes of limelight, he will remain where he us now for the rest of his life. no doubt about that.
He was a cheater and liar not a killer. No evidence of doing so literally. He will get a new trail and he will walk free. The dumb cops who did not do their job should be shamed for this massive injustice. You'll all see....much the jury did not hear
Baaaahahahahaha 🤣🤣🤣
He's a cheater, a liar, AND a killer
You're out of your tiny mind.
Are you still spreading mistruths Everett
Are you, Sophie, AKA Petelikedporn
Patty Sullivan
Anne Sull
Kim L
Slick Pete
QUOTE
" there's nothing I haven't reviewed.
I've been reviewing it for more than 10 years. I'm not impressed by TH-cam legal experts.
And for the 2nd time. RN did NOT co author a book. The fact you don't even know that tells me everything I need to know about your expertise. "
FACT
RN did co author a book called
'we, the jury'
You ran around telling people hundreds of people that Jackie, ( his deceased mother ) was a "liar".
You said she needed to fill out CTR form for the $10,000.
Truth
CTRs are filed when a customer makes a currency transaction EXCEEDING $10,000, or for multiple transactions if the sum exceeds $10,000 in one day.
That would make you the liar.
@@jwait1496 she was a liar. She also lied about what Peterson and Laci drove to Carmel.
She also lied about walking around Carmel with Laci. Going up hills, walking on sand. She and Laci had vehicle access and could drive to access points in Carmel, by the beach, to shop etc.
And she did lie about the money withdrawal, it was obviously so Scott could go on the LAM
I know now you are Everett, Sumridge.
I have never said RN didn't co author a book. I know she did. I read “We the Jury”.
@@petelikedporn6009 No Patty. You're misinformed as usual. Those were not lie.
He wasn't running anywhere. He was on his way to the golf course, Patty. He was driving North, genius. Was he taking the scenic route to Mexico. The defense played the wire tapped recording from police where Scott specifically told John his brother that it's best he didn't play golf because the media were following him, and he didn't want another picture of him in the papers.
I'm not Sumrige either, and I don't know anyone named "Everett". Keep guessing, fill your boots, Sophie.
@@petelikedporn6009 Why would Jackie take money from Scott's account to pay Scott? He didn't cash his pay check, wouldn't you think if he was going to flee, he would have made that a priority if he wanted cash to flee?
I don’t think for a second that Scott was a good, decent person, but I have doubts that he did it. Two things; how was he dumb enough to have his picture taken with his mistress with his pregnant wife at another party while being smart enough to murder an 8 month pregnant woman leave no evidence including no witnesses in broad daylight? And how did he dump her body overboard that small boat without it sinking? That would mean that their combined weight plus any weights/anchors attached would need to be concentrated in one area of the boat and then thrown over? I just don’t see how he could have done that and the prosecution didn’t prove it either.
Chris Watts murdered his entire family and left no evidence.
You don't believe Peterson could put his wife's dead body in the back of his truck while loading patio umbrellas in broad daylight without being seen but think Laci could have been abducted in broad daylight on a populated street without being seen? 👌🥴
The state DID prove it. Obviously.
It would take 400 lb to keep Laci's body down in shallow seawater like the bay. This is based on the Lori A Leonard case.
The MPD didn't care about the evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stephens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
1 bubler was closest to the cas than others
He NEEDS to be in Gen Pop!!
hmmm the neighbors across the street robbed that same day and brother talking to the robber in jail about laci! lol
There was no burglary the same day.
scott is guilty
@@wineasy9002 one piece of evidence plz? And you did know the neighbors across street got robbed that day right? That Lacey was seen walking her dog that day right? That the neighbors had to put their dog in the backyard after finding it wondering the neighborhood right? Again show me the evidence
@@SweetNSassy77 who says Laci was walking that day? Nobody.
And why did scott say Laci is dead on December 9th? What does that mean to you?
you need to know what premeditated murder is. you clearly don't know.
Hello
So what's the deal with the robbery across street? And lady down road prego said 2 guys tried to nab her before 10 that morning barney? Just wondering?
Getting ready to go on the run, dying his hair, getting rid of her things, are these peoe nuts, YES. They need to see a shrink. Definitely!
He almost got away too to go to Mexico.
He’s not guilty
Yeah he is.
He's guilty af
@@sophie8394 was u there
@@CountryBoy2280 wow that's some impressive grammar.
No I wasn't there but I have studied this case since it began and I possess critical thinking skills. There's no way he didn't do it.
@@sophie8394 sure 😃
Wow! what an assumption. You think because there was a reward that means the criminals would have turned on each other. It’s like you’re using your imagination to justify your reasoning. There is no evidence. The only evidence is the location of the body which turned up months later after the area was thoroughly searched and broadcasted. You’re not supposed to use your imagination to conjure up a scenario in which he did it. You’re supposed to have evidence that he did it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Well the two men in the white van held her captive till she had to pee than killed her by everything ive read online i heard those two guys were already in prison i thought they would of died by now..and of course they wouldnt snitch on scott no.. They wont be accountable either so...
@@sarahrayne4808 no one held her captive in a van 🤣🤣🤣
The meth head acquaintances of the burglars couldn't rat them out fast enough about the burglary to get their greedy little hands on the $1000 reward for the burglary. You think they would just stay quiet about the abduction and murder of a pregnant woman when there was $500,000 available?
@@sophie8394 really someone said years ago somewhere im a forum they saw her peeing on the aide of a road by a fence before she died.. Not making it up it juat wouldn't make sense that he actually did it himself i know they were the robbers but really could of been a set up all along.
@@sarahrayne4808 that someone was Tom Harshman. He didn't report this to police for 4 days. He was a former reserve officer who sees a pregnant woman being forced into a van and does NOTHING??? Sounds like a real stand up guy huh? This claim is unsubstantiated.
The burglars were cleared. No connection to what happened to Laci.
Sad she is beautiful blessings to family 🙏🙏❤️
We need to stop convicting on circumstantial theories. We should need real evidence to convict someone. Regardless of what we think.
Circumstantial evidence is evidence.
The burglary date was changed !!! To the 26th when it happened on the 24th.
Nope
Unfortunately yes. The initial reports said the 24th, while the cops and news media reported the 26th later. His defense lawyer and team discovered Brochinni had “lied by omission” in his reports and everything.
@@duckylmexican there is some sort of corruption I feel like.
@@duckylmexican you are an example of exactly what is wrong with this case. Spreading lies and misinformation. You have nothing to back this up.
Even if it happened on the 24th, the Medinas left their house at 10:33 am which means it happened AFTER McKenzie was found...so that means there was no abduction.
Read the Bible.
How could nobody see the body in that tiny lil boat?
The body was put in the truck and transported to the storage unit where the boat was first. Then, it was covered in the boat.
@@lug.5329 and nobody saw a thing hmm
@@UpChuckTheBoogie Sharon and the neighbors reported the truck being backed up to the house. Also, no one can see anything when the body is in the storage unit unless someone alive was locked in the storage unit, right?
@@lug.5329 omg the truck was backed up to the house 😂🤣he probably is guilty but the evidence isn't overwhelming that's for sure.
@@UpChuckTheBoogie LOL. The truck destroyed the house, didn't you know? He actually ran over her with the truck. Good luck believing the criminal perpetrator!
How many people saw lacy walking with the dog were ignored.
They weren't credible. They claimed to have seen Laci in an area she was never known to walk and at a time when Scott's cell phone records prove he was still at home.
Keep on talking, about how and the things you didn't investigate, Martha Stewart made you look like you didn't even know what you were doing.
That's all you've got? Martha Stewart? Lame. Tell me how Scott heard meringue mentioned at 9:48 am when he told police he left home at 9:30?
they did and you missed it. Stop with your bs.
Everett quit spreading untruths 😂
@@petelikedporn6009 Everett thinks the Tenbrink brothers were the burglars 🤣🤣🤣
Says jobless DB with no profession. Sit down you deranged clown.
The detectives on Scott Peterson’s case from Modesto PD were pathetic, including this dude since i believe he was one of the two main detectives. Of course he’s going to say Scott is guilty and he was correct decades ago. Such BS. Swallow your pride and admit there is a reasonable doubt.
What qualifies you to judge the detectives or their investigation?
@@sophie8394 exact same question goes to you. You have the right to your opinion if you believe they were perfect. I have the right to my opinion that they were not.
@@utcougar what I know is that besides the MPD, 90 other LE agencies participated in this investigation including the FBI and the DOJ. To assume that the case was not adequately investigated and none of them knew what they were doing is ridiculous.
@@sophie8394 when did I mention others? I only mentioned Modesto PD for one. For two I commented on this particular detective and the other one from Modesto PD. I’m essentially commenting that when or why on earth would a detective who was on a case admit to having a reasonable doubt. Of course he’s going to say “no doubt Scott Peterson is guilty”
@@utcougar anyone who refers to these detectives as "this dude" and "the other one" obviously doesn't know enough to have an opinion about how they did their jobs.
The only thing I never understood about the case was the baby being outside Laci's body with tape placed over one ear and a noose around the neck. I can see Scott killing Laci, but honestly, that part of this trial will never stop haunting me. It doesn't make sense.
These are just a couple of examples of the lies being told by Janey Peterson and Scott's shady af attorneys. There was no tape on the baby's ear and no noose 🙄 He was tangled in debris as he floated to shore.
@@sophie8394 thank you! I watched a documentary that sourced it on A&E. How are they not disbarred? That haunted me.
@@bethfinn370 that documentary was a disgrace. Created by the Peterson family and produced by one of Janey's best friends who is also a founding member of the Scott Peterson is Innocent fb group. It's full of lies, half truths and deliberately omits the evidence against SP. Sadly, it fooled a lot of people who don't know the facts.
The tape was wrapped around Conner's chest, passing under the right arm and over the left arm and looped around the neck with a knot and bow tie to the left...Conclusion: With all the other evidence that Conner did not wash ashore, the most likely scenario is that the twine was placed on Conner by human hands. It was not the cause of death, but served some other purpose. The failure of the State to identify the bugs, insects, algaes and dirt debris that were on the twine amounts to destruction of evidence which could have identified where Conner's body was during the interim between his death and being being placed on the Richmond Jetty.
@@adav5533 copy and paste garbage from the Appeal page? Or pwc-sii?
Oh, the demonization of Scott the adulterer , you can't be saying that.
Det. Jon Buehler is a very decent man. Scott was guilty, the real evidence was overwhelming, and Scott's lawyers were aware of, but didn't present, because they know it was not credible, most of the (false) sightings that are now allegedly "new evidence.". Through it all, Jon remained respectful to all parties including Scott, and always listened.
He Killed Them !! Happy New Year Scott 👍
John, tell me HOW Scott killed Laci?
😂🤦♂️
Shut up. You are everywhere. Go away!!!!
These things always bring out the mentally disturbed.
@@minacerra
What?!
Probably strangled her
@@minkeuk549 Shut up Janey.
Where is the proof, there is no solid evidence.
Tons of evidence.
@@sophie8394 How did that old man miss all the evidence that put him on death row? Wayne, get your meds adjusted.
Same detective that didn't look into the burglary across the street¿🤡👮♂️⚖️
The burglary was thoroughly investigated. Where are you getting your information?
@@sophie8394 did you not see the report about the date of the burglary?🤡👮♂️🧑⚖️⚖️
@@DocProcRealm I've seen every report. The one you've probably seen is the one with the dates entered by a county clerk listing the burglary as having occurred between the 24th and the 26th bc that's the dates that the Medinas were away. That is not the official charge.
On the 26th the burglar did not occur because media was all outside
@@AnaAlvarez-fu6yp wrong again
If the detectives were so sure Scottt murdered his wife WHY did the detectives DESTROY powerful EVIDENCE that proved his mettle innocence???
Shut up Janey Peterson.
What evidence did they destroy?
(This should be good 🤣)
Waiting 💅
Still waiting 🥱
I agree !!! Detective Aponte gave the proof and it was a tape Modesto police destroyed
Bueller, you should go away, you all messed up this case from the start.
Riiiiiight 🙄
Nope, you go away as I helped put the killer away.
What was the specific reason that an authority was foolish enough to even Consider a new trial? what was the 'problem' with 1 juror?
It’s not just “1 person of authority”, it’s a whole new team that looks at the case once the trial is all said and done, to see if there were any interferences with giving the defendant a fair trial, if there were any other possible persons of interests, the process of the investigation, etc. Part of the findings and what’s being stated in his appeal was revealed in the Hulu series’ last episode of “The Murder of Laci Peterson.” Very interesting seeing all the stuff that new team came across.
The “problem” of the 1 juror (Richelle Nice) was that they said she lied on her survey to get on the jury, how much of that is true, we’ll see when she testifies. Her attorney got her a “deal” that she can testify with immunity from prosecution for whatever she ends up testifying.
haven't watched any made for TV shows on this. but Peterson is pretty clearly a killer... isn't he? do you seriously have doubts?
but thank u for the information
Yeah except if you look into this case at all, it's evident that Scoff is innocent.
Can you tell me the time, place, or method of Laci’s murder?
@@spencer_jackson542 do you think that is known in every homicide?
@@sophie8394 no but it should be known to convict someone.
@@spencer_jackson542 you don't even have to have a body to convict someone.
@@sophie8394 no but you need to have proof of murder.
This is one CROOKED COP!!!!!
The only crooked one is you. I'd sue you if I were him.
@@kmremseysmith4771 Give an example of how the cops are crooked?
@@kmremseysmith4771 Joan Marie is a Peterson supporter. Don't listen to her. She will call you heartless like she does everyone.
@@VideoFanatic02 Her deflection is a joke as well her sad welfare collecting life.
@@kurtenglund5753 of course you got no answer. Because it isn't true.
Who ever should be listen for Scott 2 be setting free
The media has to double down on their touting of his guilt because they are the ones that convicted him. No main stream media will admit they did it wrong. It’s not about him, it’s about keeping appearances.
The media wasn't sitting in the jury box.
@@sophie8394 they sure are stooopid
I think if there was a 2nd trial and he was found guilty the family still won't accept it!
Agreed.
@@sophie8394
Petelikedporn
Sophie
VideoFanatic
Patty Sullivan
Anne Sull
Lucy Ainsworth
Kim L
Rick Tavares
Slick Pete
1.
You ran around telling people hundreds of people that Jackie, ( his deceased mother ) was a "liar".
You said she needed to fill out CTR form for the $10,000.
Truth
CTRs are filed when a customer makes a currency transaction EXCEEDING $10,000, or for multiple transactions if the sum exceeds $10,000 in one day.
That would make you the liar.
2.
When did Stacey Boyers, Laci's friend TELL YOU that Scott told her he was golfing on the evening of the 24th? I'm wondering if she would appreciate you publicly lying about her, since we both know she didn't testify to that.
3.
You posted this lie on Facebook.
""""He also lied about what she was doing when he got up.
He told Mansfield that Laci was mopping at 8 am.
Yet he told Brocchini that she was mopping when he left the morning of the 24th.""""
Interesting you leave out this important part of the testimony where MANSFIELD clearly states
'' He probably did. I don't remember exactly what it was."
HARRIS: He said that she was mopping?
MANSFIELD: Yes.
HARRIS: Did he indicate what it was that she was mopping, or was going to mop?
MANSFIELD: He probably did. I don't remember exactly what it was.
So you're accepting MANSFIELD's statement as fact that Scott lied, when he doesn't remember what Scott said. Well done 👏. Keep the lies coming. You will never change.
4.
,"Laci could hardly walk, I can't see her obsessively cleaning.
The house cleaner mopped the floors on the 23rd.
Scott is the one who used the mop. Just like he was vacuuming obsessively in front of the washing machine on Christmas day."
Why would anyone accept someone being guilty when the evidence doesn't prove it. was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
@@jwait1496 copy and paste garbage from the appeal page. Looks like Janey Peterson owes you another nickel 🤑
@@sophie8394 Those are called facts. Something you're not familiar with.
Scott DID NOT Cap Size!! It’s physically impossible to throw 180 pound dead weight over a small boat without capsizing...... Even on stable solid ground you couldn’t throw 150 pound weight without falling over DUH!!!!
Snooze.
@@kmremseysmith4771 The judge will be receiving hundreds upon hundreds of letters if she hasn't already from people complaining he didn't get a fair trial.
You should read the testimony of the expert fisherman who said its 100% possible.
@@sophie8394 of course it is. I'm 60 years old at 5' 7. In spite of that, I squat 425 pounds for sets. I could easily pick up 190 pounds and throw it into the water. People love to limit other people's abilities on their own inadequacies.
@@Don-lf9ku 👏👏👏
Okay... Just relay can we the people do to get rid of the post master. He's a creep totally incompetent and needs to be replaced.
Enjoy General Population !!
Ole Scotty won’t like gen pop
Lol this guy thinks Scotts life is going to be in danger in gen pop? Scott is a VERY well liked guy in prison. Even the guards like him. And he's not a pedophile, so...
🤣🤣🤣
The prisoners said Scott would be a trophy kill. I saw a documentary about it that talks specifically about Scott Peterson. The guard said the other prisoners will hurt him. The cop knows more than you think.
@@kurtenglund5753 he's a marked man for sure. Good. Hope he gets exactly what he deserves.
@@sophie8394 Can you imagine how many letters the judge has received that Scott didn't get a fair trial? Probably hundreds if not thousands. His supporters are desperate.
@@kurtenglund5753 Judge Delucchi has passed away but I'm sure he did at the time. The Supreme Court of California upheld his guilty conviction and affirmed the fairness of his trial in 2020 and the people who seem to think they know more than the SC is hysterical 🤣
They are desperate and delusional.
Scott is innocent and no one will listen Nancy grace talked about Scott and called him a peace of shit how would you feel knowing your interest
Nancy Grace lives rent free in all of the Scott lovers heads 🤣🤣🤣
The golden boy thought he would get away with it. Wrong answer scotty. You could have divorced your wife but no. You were too greedy and selfish. So now you reap it.
There is no evidence he murdered anyone.
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
@@aok4418 Get off the meth and don't quit your day job.
@@rephaimog4186 😆😆😆😆
@@aok4418 He's not going anywhere. I can't wait to see if he gets put in regular population. I want to see him get whacked. The AB hates killers of women and children.
@@rephaimog4186 Please... you have no idea what you're talking about.