ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ค. 2024
- #multi-tower #seismicanalysis #seismicdesign #ETABS
Join us on Telegram
Civil Engineering Forum👇🏻
t.me/ilustracacivil
ETABS-SAFE-SAP2000👇🏻
t.me/etabssafesap2000
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @ilustraca
Advance Study in RCC Building Design using ETABS and Manual Checks
Pre-recorded + Project solving (Batch 2022/01)
Introductory session 01- • Advance Study in RCC B...
Introductory session 02- • Advance Study in RCC B...
Course Fee- 8000/- INR (8 Months access)
Install our Android App now to get the course-
on-app.in/app/home?orgCode=amitco
Enroll to the course (Only available on Anroid)-
amitco.courses.store/157431?u...
N.B.: Admission to this batch is open till April, 2022.
I'm really appreciate your effort in these two videos, we're looking forward to part 3 ASAP ..
very heldpful.
very well explained.
Eagerly waiting for the next part to learn about analysis result extraction and result interpretation of multiple towers.
When can we expect the next part of this ?
Outstanding. please share the next video regarding this tutorial. Thanks in advance
dear sir. great job. looking urgently for part 3 please
Great effort
waiting the part 3.
Thank you. Eagerly waiting for next video.
thank u so much!
We are looking forward to the third part, please!
It's very helpful .
Thank u sir🙏
You are amazing man. Thank you.😉
Thank you for the video ! Quick question, in this method each tower is analyzed individually (simply pinned at the base) in order to find the static base shear (for scaling purposes) - how does this paint an accurate picture as these towers are not pinned to the base / ground rather on another building / base that is also oscillating / vibrating (potentially impacting the natural period of the towers , and their vibration behavior). I would really appreciate your input on this. looking forward to part 3 indeed!
Thanks you sir
Hi guys. Sorry to say this video is not given a brief about model analysis for the response spectrum case. We have to capture separate response spectrum behaviour which is very crucial. Eq.static method can be used without multiple tower options as we can calculate story shear by manually and can apply through diaphragm (Mass building can be given by etabs)
Please do further research on model analysis for multiple tower
Thank you
Years back when there was no software, tall buildings were analysed and designed manually...No one stops you to calculate forces manually. The video just explained the ability of software program to do the same. Nothing else. And adding to that, this video is not explaining full analysis and design process as you are expecting. It is just an introduction to the specific tool of the software. Kindly understand the context of the content first.
Thank you
Sir please share the next part of the multiple tower 🗼 series
We are eagerly waiting for the next part
Thanks 👍😊
Sir, when I check the load after input with this way..there have 2 load is Vertikal load and Horizontal load in center di diafragma.. what is the vertical load mean sir?? You can check in display-load-point load-EX or EY after running this model you will found vertical and horizontal load in center diafragma..may be you must uncheck “apply load at diafragm center of mass” the vertical load will be 0 in the center diafragm
Thank you. How did you separate the dead loads? All towers' load added for DEAD pattern? How did you take this mass into account correctly for each modal case of the towers?
Thank you for this valuable content. For load combination what's the procedure to follow . Thanks
👏👏👏
Thank you for this video.
Is part 3 available?
👍👍👍
Is it practical to give separate load patterns for both towers and assign loads accordingly to bypass exporting the model?
i.e. T1-EQx, T1-Live, T1-Floor Finish etc will be only assigned in T1 and T1-EQx will have Mass Source only for T1 cases.
We can create multiple mass sources but Etabs v19 does not let us take different mass sources for for different response spectrum functions. Is there any work around for that?
👏
sir after running analysis it is showing no eighen modes can be found... can u please help.. also modal is failed in analysis.. please help it to restrained..
there is aquestion .. for modifiers i will make modifiers for separates towers when I make export and i make it again in full model or i make it only in full model
Good job sir. But it is meaningless to do scaling since the RS is not catching each tower mode separately
Very good stuff- but where is part 3? Please finish the series
What should be the specifications for the software installation
How to create Static loads
why did Rs-x-T2 and Rs-x-T3 get the same result?
Part 3 please
Sir part -3 kb aaega?
How to add gust wind....since time period wiil be different
The same way.. separately
Check the TP in independent model and calculate force accordingly and apply in the integrated model as u have separate diaphragm for both thr towers
Unsure about your approach of doing separate response spectrum analysis case for the two structures in 1 model. Without defining any change in mass source and modal analysis, the program will definitely yield the same mode shapes for the two cases, thus giving same results for both t2 and t3 response spectrum cases. Which simply makes the intention to define separate scale factor useless.
we r not going to RS in the integrated model...we'll apply user forces on it that we got from the individual model
@@ilustracaah alright, I thought you were making RS cases in integrated model at timestamp 9:30 onward
btw, I have a model with many tower, and between them is the expansion joint, so have to doing response spectrum analysis? thank both of you
@@lehoangan5353 was it necessary for you to model the multiple towers in an integrated model