PilotsEYE.tv - Preview - SEA777F - Factory Visit Part one

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 39

  • @mockbar09
    @mockbar09 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bluray am Wochenende geschaut. Wie immer klasse Bilder und tolle Einblicke. 👍

  • @DM-hw4cr
    @DM-hw4cr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw a little tully's coffee shop on the floor behind some fencing.

  • @100TCrow
    @100TCrow 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yay, an inside look

  • @rogerstuder3680
    @rogerstuder3680 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    3 millionen Teile... fange an zu zaehlen, glaube aber das ich nicht so alt werden um fertig zu werden.

  • @larrydockery7201
    @larrydockery7201 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the 777 but I grew up on the l-1011 tri star to me nothing was better than it I can still walk in the cock pit and start her up if she was still flying

  • @Alvaradocma
    @Alvaradocma 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this channel!

  • @you14beta
    @you14beta 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice realy great building.normal y all personnel in endwork have free one

  • @zxzv1
    @zxzv1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had been on the guided tour of Boeing at Paine Field, WA and video recorders of any kind are banned on the tour. I guess, since its LH taking special permission - seems OK, rite?

  • @yoyoyoyoshua
    @yoyoyoyoshua 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been inside several times.

  • @delmarquisclark1590
    @delmarquisclark1590 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thats my home.. Seattle

    • @1Barsamian
      @1Barsamian 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean Everett. I used to work there

  • @OlegTeplyakov
    @OlegTeplyakov 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does it inflates during the flight then if I see none of gaps and how does the tube increase the size ?

  • @sengottuvels7547
    @sengottuvels7547 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Aeronautical engineering pathe details sollu bro please

  • @cdimmm
    @cdimmm 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    can we talk about fuel capacity a little bit?

  • @martin.B777
    @martin.B777 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unglaublich!

    • @martin.B777
      @martin.B777 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Nyabinghi Uhuru It's the German equivalent of "amazing" :)

  • @madisonelectronic
    @madisonelectronic 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where are the beer dispensers?

  • @vancetrigger
    @vancetrigger 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    cool

  • @FlyguyChevy
    @FlyguyChevy 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    any U.s link?

  • @hadibadashi
    @hadibadashi 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if Lufthansa will have to spend millions again to remove the uninterruptible autopilots in their newest acquisitions which according to Lufthansa are not supposed to be there and are not listed on the build specs .

    • @KriVaDesign
      @KriVaDesign 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +hadibadashi Uninterruptible autopilots? What are you talking about?

    • @hadibadashi
      @hadibadashi 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Google it !

    • @KriVaDesign
      @KriVaDesign 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +hadibadashi Thank you very much, magnificently helpful internet person... -_-

    • @hadibadashi
      @hadibadashi 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      “During early 1995, Boeing sales experienced an unconnected but serious internal problem in Europe, though the details were never made public. The German flag carrier Lufthansa discovered that its new Boeing 747-400 aircraft had been fitted with flight directors [auto-pilots] that were vulnerable to American remote-control, ostensibly designed to “recover” hijacked aircraft whether the hijackers wanted to be recovered or not. Lufthansa was not informed about this “free extra” in advance, and was furious that its sovereign aircraft might be covertly “rescued” by America, without the knowledge or permission of the German Government.
      In a mammoth operation rumoured to cost in excess of $800 million, Lufthansa stripped every flight director out of every Boeing in its fleet, replacing them in total with German systems programmed by the Luftwaffe [German Air Force]. According to a member of the German internal security service in Frankfurt during October 1996, all Lufthansa aircraft had by that date been secured, rendering them invulnerable to remote flight director commands transmitted by any and all American authorities. Under the new intelligence protocols, Russia and France were made aware of these flight director risks.”

    • @hadibadashi
      @hadibadashi 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thomas Vandermeiren Thank you Sir .

  • @user-sf1uv4gf4i
    @user-sf1uv4gf4i 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    新舊加裝抬頭顯示儀

  • @Stratojocker
    @Stratojocker 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Boeing are use many chinese 0:55 light truck FAW CA1020V. This good if BOEING are use it.

  • @lucasadrielheinz346
    @lucasadrielheinz346 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    New group of aviation in WhatsApp?

  • @Gesanglehrer
    @Gesanglehrer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    cool but Airbus is better ;-)

    • @ammaarquraishi2398
      @ammaarquraishi2398 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gartenfuzzi wait.. what?

    • @martydxpestano1402
      @martydxpestano1402 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No boeing is better than airbus

    • @rafaelvillarsanchez9602
      @rafaelvillarsanchez9602 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      even the 787 dreamliner????

    • @DM-hw4cr
      @DM-hw4cr 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dreamliner

    • @musicfeign6349
      @musicfeign6349 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not even close. Airbus and the a380, need I say more. Name one Boeing aircraft in modern era jet flying that didn't sell successfully and basically is still flying today. Can't beat the staying power of the 737 , 747, 727, 767 , 707 and the almighty 757. To the point where Boeing is regretting it retired the 757. So therefore when Boeing releases the 797 , will be a 3k to 4K aircraft order for worldwide sales what does Airbus have. A321, airlines only order it because there is not a design like the proposed 797 available. Best Airbus can do is revive the a310, re engine, re cockpit and it most probably will be a close competitor for the 797. Or really name the new aircraft a360.