I feel like and I know that both of those cars are safe but the merc was good on the pole impact, there was less roof deformation and rear door impact.
If you look at the reports from Euro NCAP on these two cars the Mercedes just pips the BMW. The difference is the driver being less protected in both frontal tests. You have to look at the test reports because they're the ones with the real data of what happened to the occupants.
In a crash, you want the car to take the kinetic force and not the occupants. You can really tell the dummies in the comments who think that the vehicle that shows less damage is the better of the two. 🤣
definetely. There are several details from how much the front of the bmw goes down to the amount of the doors opening on the lateral side crash. Also look at the way the X5 roof spike on the lateral crash, meanwhile the gle remains relatevely flat
А смысл, все что выше 80-90 км в час - это уже лотерея и выбор каждого играть или нет в поддавки со смерью. Самолёты же никто не бьет с высоты и скорости эшелона, ибо понятно, что законы физики не обманешь и шансов выжить, почти, нет, но, при этом, люди все равно летают )
@@Vdzenb Расчёт на то, что ты будешь не превышать те самые 80 км в час, которые повсеместно в Европе на дорогах за городом (немецкие автобаны не берём) и успеешь оттормозиться до 40-50 км в час, а там уже системы безопасности тебя спасут. Расчёт только на это.
if you knew anything about physics thats what makes the mercedes safer lmao. It distributes the force towards the front end of the car rather then inside the cabin to the passangers. Allowing them to feel less of an impact.
@@tomas61598 wakes up to car thats ballooned in size hahaha. I love em completely but what happens if compromised by a bump or something. Also isn't that a limited thing that's hard to get unless we invade Korea.
Let me inform you idiot, it doesn’t matter how the car looks it matters how the occupants are and the occupants in the Mercedes had way less injuries than what happened in the BMW
it shows that the mercedes wasnt able to dissipate the force correctly whereas the bmw was. if the glass shatters that easily, imagine what the forces on the occupants must be.
@@smar1208 What? the mercedes distributed the force the best by putting it on the windshield and front end RATHER then the inside of the vehicle. If you look at the test dummy on the mercedes side you clearly see they move less (less impact) rather then the X5. thats how physics works. May I also add the X5s frame is slightly more fragile then the merc, which isnt a good thing...
Merc better on front end collision but BMW better on side impact? Both seemed very protective.
ВМW во всех пораметрах лучше! Просмотри внимательнее!
X5 and GLE are mother ships, if the other vehicle is a regular cheap car i feel sorry for the people driving those.
Merc windshield broke from airbag?
I’m assuming from the airbag cover aka dashboard
I’d feel safe in both.
Same
both are very safe cars, but that pole test with the x5 takes a point off the merc.
They're solid materials. But yes, if liquid and made badly, they would leak
@footballcoreano really? what about pickup trucks
i see mercedes safer in basically every segmento of the video :)
@@karlk.6819Nope
But the music dose slap ngl
so do balz
It’s amazing how fast they repair the cars for each test performed! 😂😂😂
they use a different car each time
Smartest men ever in antartica
@@pokoco-opIts a jok😂
I’d expect nothing less from the company aka Mercedes, that invented ABS, airbag, radar guided cruise, xenon lighting and much more
I feel like and I know that both of those cars are safe but the merc was good on the pole impact, there was less roof deformation and rear door impact.
THE BMW PERFORMED VERY HUGE DIFFERENCE THAN MERC ON SIDE IMPACT
Made me sick to watch. I have a x5. Both look like they did very good.
If you look at the reports from Euro NCAP on these two cars the Mercedes just pips the BMW. The difference is the driver being less protected in both frontal tests. You have to look at the test reports because they're the ones with the real data of what happened to the occupants.
mercedes structure is way more safer, the X5 looks fragile. Huge difference is in small details. Try looking the video at 0.50x speed
Nope.
@@thegamer4646oh yes true.!
They always in the service department to get in any type of crash
🤣
Mercedes is best ... recently cricketers rishabh pant saved his life just because of Mercedes
In a crash, you want the car to take the kinetic force and not the occupants. You can really tell the dummies in the comments who think that the vehicle that shows less damage is the better of the two. 🤣
What were the ratings?
Love my x5 driving machine
I feel like mer did a slightly better job
definetely. There are several details from how much the front of the bmw goes down to the amount of the doors opening on the lateral side crash.
Also look at the way the X5 roof spike on the lateral crash, meanwhile the gle remains relatevely flat
@@karlk.6819 We should compare results from the crash test dummy injuries.
@@milosvukajlovic9768 I’m not sure where to find these results, any idea which one has fewer “injuries”?
@@karlk.6819 it’s not that big of a difference 😭. Both did similar and well.
@@Val12354 Yaaaah cuz like feelz r everything or whateverrrrr
Both 5 star..
The results links should be available. Images without results are worthless.
Y me pueden dar un veredicto? Entiendo que ambos son excelentes...
In my opinion BMW did a little bit better.
So which one is the clear cut winner?????
BMW cuz off side impact is better
@@henzo7087mercedes got better score
X5 wins
i need to ask why X5 all cameras are like a form 10 years ago
what is the speed of ithe mpact?
BMW 😎👊
Fingers gone in real life scenario
а чего не 100 или 150 или 200км/ч?? Как они летают по автобанам.
А смысл, все что выше 80-90 км в час - это уже лотерея и выбор каждого играть или нет в поддавки со смерью. Самолёты же никто не бьет с высоты и скорости эшелона, ибо понятно, что законы физики не обманешь и шансов выжить, почти, нет, но, при этом, люди все равно летают )
@@sergeyo118 Тогда зачем эти 5 звёзд, если человеку не выжить свыше 100км.ч.? Типе дать веру человеку?)
@@Vdzenb Расчёт на то, что ты будешь не превышать те самые 80 км в час, которые повсеместно в Европе на дорогах за городом (немецкие автобаны не берём) и успеешь оттормозиться до 40-50 км в час, а там уже системы безопасности тебя спасут. Расчёт только на это.
BMW clear winner, Mercedes front end exploded like a grenade and shattered the windshield.
that's what's supposed to happen. That's how energy is dissipated. Look at how the test dummies moved less in the mercedes
if you knew anything about physics thats what makes the mercedes safer lmao. It distributes the force towards the front end of the car rather then inside the cabin to the passangers. Allowing them to feel less of an impact.
Mercedes for the win
absolutely no. the side impact caused more damage of the Merc.
@@itonful over-all Mercedes did better
Bmw for the win
@@BlackNinja4839 okk boomer
@@mikhaelolbrechtscosta3903 No, BMW did better overall... both did really good btw... 5 stars.
Wonder if the battery in the all electric would pour acid all over the place 🤔
Electric vehicles use lithium ion batteties which doesn't have acid in them.
@@tomas61598 oo thanks 😊 so no danger of blowing up then. My phone once melted. And my segway. .
@@tomas61598 wakes up to car thats ballooned in size hahaha.
I love em completely but what happens if compromised by a bump or something.
Also isn't that a limited thing that's hard to get unless we invade Korea.
Well they are both expensive to crash so nobody won.
BMW did better than the Mercedes
Lies
How can you say that ?
Anyone who believes that Merc did a better job, take a look at 1:07 and see how the Merc's passenger airbag smashed the glass.
that's due to the airbag! is clearly not related to the crash
@@karlk.6819 Seriously??
Let me inform you idiot, it doesn’t matter how the car looks it matters how the occupants are and the occupants in the Mercedes had way less injuries than what happened in the BMW
If an airbag could make such an impact, the first thing that would be smashed were the passengers' head. That had nothing to do with the airbag.
@@yk4993 Wow!
A lot of IQ just erupted from your brain
Search "watermelon vs airbag" to see how strong an airbag impact is.
Mercedes for the WIN 😊
👍👍👍👍👍
MB all the way!
- Å fan! 👍
Bmw ✅💪🤙👑👍😎👊
great cars
The glass on the Mercedes is trash
Every crash the windows shattered everywhere
The BMW at least kept most of it in place
it shows that the mercedes wasnt able to dissipate the force correctly whereas the bmw was. if the glass shatters that easily, imagine what the forces on the occupants must be.
@@smar1208 What? the mercedes distributed the force the best by putting it on the windshield and front end RATHER then the inside of the vehicle. If you look at the test dummy on the mercedes side you clearly see they move less (less impact) rather then the X5. thats how physics works. May I also add the X5s frame is slightly more fragile then the merc, which isnt a good thing...
@@user-um3fx2vk8rnah bmw has a tougher frame than a Benz. Explain why the bmw did better in the side impact and the lower front.
@@thegamer4646 pretty terrible bait buddy
They have stickeres 50,00000 dollars with wall
God sfty drivers cars 👍
Merco all the way❤
Hello everyone
Mercedes airbag crash the front window.
I don't think that was because of the airbag. It should have something with the way tension was transferred/distributed around the windshield.
Mercedes is so strong
Mercades top 🔝
Mercedes has bigger airbags in front
No one win because all inside dead
😯😯😯
Merc
Bmw did better
Мерс лучше
Always Mercedes…
Noob mercedes lol merc don't know how to build car bmw best
Fact : Mercedes was the first to build a car
This isn't the place to be a toxic fanboy
Volvo the best !!!