The moment you got to the river bridge it was over. They lost too much to push you back and hold without someone else dumping everything they had to help him.
I really like all the recon Bradleys that 8th Infantry gets. They have very good optics and 12 Tow-2 ATGM's. You get fire support, recon, and ATGM's all in one package. I think it's one of the highlights of this deck.
I can see why Conquest is more meta. It puts more emphasis on actually gaining ground and pushing forward instead of camping and just getting kills. So from a more competitive standpoint, i'd say Conquest is better in that regard. I think there's always going to be some complaints about artillery in these types of game. But i still think it's balanced in Warno, because of the ammunition. If you spam a lot of artillery, then you're going to use a lot of supplies on keeping your artillery operational. Which means other units on the frontlines might not get the supplies they need. Could you imagine how this game would be if it was like Company of Heroes, and you just have unlimited ammunition? Now that would make artillery annoying.
I almost exclusively play 10vs10 tactical destruction in Red Dragon. I really wish that was popular in Warno, then I would actually play the game. At the moment it only seems people play Warno for the 1vs1 gameplay
I actually preferred total destruction mode back in wargame red dragon, pretty much any of Eugen's games that have had it. The downside is it can be a really, really, REALLY long game. But when you don't have to worry about points and just have to worry about pushing the enemy off the board, the objectives you pursue get a little more flexible. You aren't worried about a cost/benefit analysis of making an assault, it's just important you make it to the next position or you can build up forces in a part of the map seemingly insignificant and make those parts significant areas of conflict by dint of just being there. But destruction mode with points and a time limit is a bit campy, part of it is I think players who don't like or want to give up ground, like instead of realizing that a position is untenable and beginning a withdraw of units to a position better defended, they'd rather just fight a pointless fight and keep bringing in units to a fight they're going to lose. Maybe if they had a points refund like how the transports are except for all units, things would be different, because when you're trying to attack a fortified position you might want heavy artillery, but here you are stuck having sunk in a few hundred point into an apache and now it's just sitting behind the lines looking to pick off a lone tank because you don't know if there's an igla in the town you're attacking
I have a question about this game. My friends and I used to play 2-4 co-op against AI in COH1 and 2 a lot but we are looking into other games to play and warno came onto my radar. Is this game good with some friends against AI? Are there various AI difficulty settings? We are really not looking at playing against each other or against other human players.
This game definitely has the options for what you are looking for. Even more so when the game fully releases. It will have a co op campaign as well. Should check out Steel Division 2 if you like the WW2 theme as well.
Hi Vulcan, found your channel over Christmas as purchased steel division 2. I play wargame which I really like, how does warno compare? Is it worth changing over to?
Destruction mode sucks, especially in team games. As soon as one side gets a ~2k+ lead, it just snowballs from there. At least with capture you can lose units without giving massive advantages to the other side.
Not sure if anyone's mentioned it before, but the HEMTT's are pronounced as HIM-IT, instead of HEMT. It's weird but it's like how HMMWV is Humvee
Great to see more warno, game is really improving with time hope to see much more of it on the channel!
I would love to see more and more Warno on the channel, I am falling in love with the game
The moment you got to the river bridge it was over. They lost too much to push you back and hold without someone else dumping everything they had to help him.
That armor and artillery push at 28:15 really made my heart soar
the kda push towards the end was awesome, hoping the next video will be the preview of one of the new divisions
There is definitely a place for destruction mode, that was carnage, great content as always V 😀👍
That game was beautiful! Now I realized that I want to see more DESTRUCTION xd
The graphics of this game are stunning
The ai either death stacks in a field where you can pick them off with tanks using smoke, or they pull a fast smart move on you
26:33 this rly be a makiivka moment.
I really like all the recon Bradleys that 8th Infantry gets. They have very good optics and 12 Tow-2 ATGM's. You get fire support, recon, and ATGM's all in one package. I think it's one of the highlights of this deck.
the hell in the Earth on 35:43 mother of god
I can see why Conquest is more meta. It puts more emphasis on actually gaining ground and pushing forward instead of camping and just getting kills.
So from a more competitive standpoint, i'd say Conquest is better in that regard.
I think there's always going to be some complaints about artillery in these types of game. But i still think it's balanced in Warno, because of the ammunition. If you spam a lot of artillery, then you're going to use a lot of supplies on keeping your artillery operational. Which means other units on the frontlines might not get the supplies they need.
Could you imagine how this game would be if it was like Company of Heroes, and you just have unlimited ammunition?
Now that would make artillery annoying.
Good game to watch! Random question Vulcan, in your personal opinion when do you think we will see an army general campaign release for this game.
i am subscribed and have notifications on but didnt get a notification about this.
I almost exclusively play 10vs10 tactical destruction in Red Dragon. I really wish that was popular in Warno, then I would actually play the game.
At the moment it only seems people play Warno for the 1vs1 gameplay
I actually preferred total destruction mode back in wargame red dragon, pretty much any of Eugen's games that have had it. The downside is it can be a really, really, REALLY long game. But when you don't have to worry about points and just have to worry about pushing the enemy off the board, the objectives you pursue get a little more flexible. You aren't worried about a cost/benefit analysis of making an assault, it's just important you make it to the next position or you can build up forces in a part of the map seemingly insignificant and make those parts significant areas of conflict by dint of just being there.
But destruction mode with points and a time limit is a bit campy, part of it is I think players who don't like or want to give up ground, like instead of realizing that a position is untenable and beginning a withdraw of units to a position better defended, they'd rather just fight a pointless fight and keep bringing in units to a fight they're going to lose. Maybe if they had a points refund like how the transports are except for all units, things would be different, because when you're trying to attack a fortified position you might want heavy artillery, but here you are stuck having sunk in a few hundred point into an apache and now it's just sitting behind the lines looking to pick off a lone tank because you don't know if there's an igla in the town you're attacking
Love the WARNO content!
destruction needs a hardcore/alt mode with a delayed score counter and no pt headers on kills
Can someone tell me why should I really but warno if I have wargame red dragon? What are the major differences?
I have a question about this game. My friends and I used to play 2-4 co-op against AI in COH1 and 2 a lot but we are looking into other games to play and warno came onto my radar. Is this game good with some friends against AI? Are there various AI difficulty settings? We are really not looking at playing against each other or against other human players.
This game definitely has the options for what you are looking for. Even more so when the game fully releases. It will have a co op campaign as well. Should check out Steel Division 2 if you like the WW2 theme as well.
@@VulcanHDGaming Thanks for your reply Vulcan, I appreciate it.
Great video!
Hi Vulcan, found your channel over Christmas as purchased steel division 2. I play wargame which I really like, how does warno compare? Is it worth changing over to?
WARNO is still finding it's identity but if you enjoy the modern setting and would like an upgrade then I'd recommend it for sure.
Thank you. Great channel by the way. Really enjoy watching the videos. Learnt several things already. Do you stream on twitch?
@@nigelcollier301 Thanks, I do! Every Tues, wed, Thurs, Sunday (sometimes Saturday) from 8pm to 12pm GMT.
Cheers. I'll try and catch you
anyone know when the campaign mode will be available?
I really like your WARNO videos but to be honest I am much more of a Steel Division Fan haha
What is a good deck for the 3rd Armoured?
check the description of the video, he has a list of his personal deck codes there
Destruction mode sucks, especially in team games. As soon as one side gets a ~2k+ lead, it just snowballs from there. At least with capture you can lose units without giving massive advantages to the other side.
Welcome back, Vulcan!
*I've also recorded this game a lot, but I'm already bored and I'm waiting for Broken Arrow come out*
Ya big bully. Making all the other players give up after you curb stomp them.
is this game can't setting the graphics
What
@@flyingtanks9313 sorry my English bad
@@flyingtanks9313 is this game unable to set the graphics?
@@flyingtanks9313 its locked on my PC, i can set on low graphics
@@pertampan2817 oh uhh for me I can set it bro
10v10 Destruction just sucks honestly. And it's all I played for hundreds of hours on red dragon.