Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-X 186 HP Acceleration
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024
- Car: Mazda 3 IV Hatchback 2.0 SkyActiv-X 186 HP 2022
Engine: 2.0L Petrol (Gasolina) 4-cylinders
Displacement (cc): 1998
Power: 137 kW/186 hp
Torque: 240 Nm
Transmission: 6-speed manual
Traction: FWD ( Front-Wheel Drive )
Acceleration (0-100 km/h): 8,4 s.
Dragy Acceleration Joe (0-100 km/h): 9,9 s.
Top Speed: 216 km/h
Fuel Consumption Combined in l/100 km by Mazda: 6,0
Fuel Consumption Combined in l/100 km by Joe : 7,3
Car Mileage 1824 kilometers
Fuel Tank Capacity: 51L
Total Range: 850 km
Weight: 1392 Kg
Cargo Space: 327 Liter
Model: 2022
Date of Production : 2019-
Base Price in Germany : 25.890 EUR
![เปิด อาณาจักร หมื่นล้าน "สาระตั้ม" l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3XE0nPF4YkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I find it ridiculous that the redline is before the redline, lol.
It’s hard to tell in the video but there is lighter red marks at 6500rpm to signify redline
Engine leans out at like 5800
Putting it in sport mode will amp it up closer for sure.
Just got the mazda 3 skyactive x sedan. It is gorgeous and drives brilliantly ❤
I cannot seem to find it in the uk anywhere and it’s killing me, I love the way it looks and it ticks the boxes for low cost insurance and tax
You could've launched the car at 2500-3500rpm, and the shift's where kind of slow.
I could changed my knickers faster?
And late
The fuel is cut out at around 6100-6300 rpm depending on a gear, so the changes were too late
If you launch a car at those revs you’re going to completely knacker the tires and the clutch.
@@intrepid_wandering, he's driving a manual
I Love you Mazda 3 ❤❤❤
In every car you do a 0-100 time, you change gears way too late
How
Well how much time will you safe with your ultra fast changing gears? 0.1sec? This guy resepect not his own car
@@PasymCzivv i think his point is hes using up the whole rev range. where some cars powerband is more so in the mid, not high rpm. like for sky-G 2.0 i believe the torque band is optimized between 3500-4000rpm
Really beautiful.... It's elegant... Mazda is always beautiful and most reliable car after lexus
Hondas number 1 actually, mazdas about 3rd
Kia like 500th 😂
You cant do a good 0-100 time starting at 2000 rpm with this car please seriously...
Amazing car
1.- Cambias demasiado tarde las marchas.
2.- revoluciona el motor antes de iniciar.
3.- Saquenme de latinoamerica 😢
Launch RPM we're way too low and shifting is incredibly slow.🤨 Not a good representation of the cars capability.
Ok lol 😂let’s be real… it’s a Mazda cx30 not a corvette… the fact that it makes it to at least 100mph is sufficient for 99.9%of drivers for this car.😂 just saying.
@Cheaphorsepower it's a 3 not a cx30 and the 0 to 60 is 6.8 seconds not 9 like shown here
@@greensabr2006.8 is a different model
@98envy the 2.0 liter doesn't have 186 hp, the 2.5 does. The 186hp 2.5L has a 6.8 or 6.9 0 to 60. I own the 2.5L 22 M3
@@greensabr200e-skyactiv x 2.0 is 186hp, the video is about this engine
re-tuning a Mazda 3 would be insane
Is it tuned or something? The 2.0 makes about 155 horse, the 2.5 makes 186.
Nice!
The results are blocked 🚫 can't see it
9.9
엔진음..👍👍👍
Ten samochód robi 8sek do setki. Naucz się jeździć.
jak
Why is it lagging on the top end, are these just your gear switches, or is the flywheel super heavy?
The rev hang is real.. not sure how it is w the sky-x but i assume it has to be heavier than the sky-G (with having a ton more torque). I have the G 2.0 6MT and the upgraded pulley was what got rid if that issue. I now dont miss shift points caused by rev hang
How do you mean upgraded pulley? You upgraded yourself? @@RafaelLopeztattoos
yup, corksport or i know some other aftermarket brands have lightweight pulley. pretty simple stuff tbh. note this will drop your fuel efficiency as well. just like a lighter flywheel.
also from someone who races, he mentioned it could introduce knock if revd up close to redline
With the 120hp mazda 3 I made 9.0s 0-100 this one should be definitely quicker.
It would be quicker if launched. Probably closer to 8.5 seconds
@@jameschamberlain5817 8.5?? faster than 8.5
He shifted at about 6k rpms which is very late. He also only went up to 3rd gear. He should of shifted more or 3k-4k rpms as acceleration dramatically drops off a little past that. Had he he shifted earlier, 0-100 would be more around 7 secs
@@ninjalinchpin4498this engine cant go sub 8.5 whatever you do. Automatic with lounch control does 8.9 which is pretty poor for 186hp. Everything else on this car is top notch.
CX60 Is a big 2500kg SUV how he can do faster ? With this small engine 187hp.
Still irked they never brought this to the states. A smaller engine and same HP as the 2.5 while more efficient would have been a nice complement. But they worried too much about cannibalizing sales and logistics. 😢
Why do you need this trash engine in the US? This is the poor people engine because we don't have petrol and it's expensive
@@dantebg100 More torque, better displacement. More efficient. I'll take it even if you call it for poor people lol
@@gabrieliacoboni6951 Lol foreal. Hows this for poor ppl when this is more expensive than the base G 2.0L?
Maybe he meant that diesel is poor ppl car and this is mazdas answer to making petrol closer to diesel spec.
Coming from only owning diesels before moving into a mazda, i was also devastated to realize the G wasnt the X. I dont know how i thought all skyactiv was the same tech at the time.
Also this has a much better torque curve that actually starts at 2k like a diesel. That shit you can be satisfied to shift at 2k on a regular commute and still make it fun and effecient. Petrols you need to step on till 3.5-4k for actual pull to happen.
Tested the '21 M3 2.5s and got 7.9s 0-60mph with balding 245 tires
Baddest shifting ever, probably an american
Zastawiam się, czemu na tylu testach osiągane są tak słabe czasy, mam Mazdę 3 z pierwszej generacji SkyActive-X w manualu i przyśpieszam o wiele lepiej. Ale wiele osób obchodzi się z nią jak z samochodem uturbionym, może dlatego. Przede wszystkim nie startuje z zerowych obrotów i z włączoną kontrolą trakcji jeśli faktycznie chce wystartować "na wyścigi".
2.0 120 KM 3-ciego genu robi lepsze czasy niż 4 gen 186KM - Jeździłem tym autem i też mnie to zadziwia. Chyba masa jednak była decydująca
Przecież to auto nie ma przyśpieszenia 10 sekund do setki. To co tu zrobił ten gościu to jakaś padaka.
Bo ten silnik ma słaby moment obrotowy, czyli główna siła napędowa jest do bani. Dzisiaj silnik 1.0 z turbiną ma większy moment obrotowy niż ta pseudo technologia SA-X.
Comes with a head up display??
Блин чувак) все хорошо,много слов по делу,но то что ты снимал в салоне ночью, это минус, яркость экрана на полную а глаза все равно пытаются картинку смотреть 😂 тебя еле видно как и салон, днем надо было снимать
Cuka blyet
Not sure what vis you watched but this is def not at night.
Could be late afternoon or just overcast
it’s not 9.9 sec, it’s 7.9
Türkiye’ye ne zaman gelecek
why have an 8k rev limiter if it only goes to 6.5
Look at the torque and power curves, then youll understand why its not really about the redline in these mazdas.
Realize they usually have higher displacement but doesnt put out crazy power like a lot of other brands. Mazda likes longevity and reliability with their handling. All around drivers cars.
It’s surprising that such a heavy SUV do 0-100 on 10 seconds with such a low-power engine.
Nice
while were here in the complaint line, it doesnt help the time with dude turning the wheel at launch.
i mean it really doesnt seem like a launch, more like a merge. like he just had to stop on the side of the highway and now has to get up to speed of the traffic.
Need to hit the max torque point with your gear shift, over revving is costing you so much time. I have the exact same engine, i did it in 8.1.
Yup, with the G, 4k is the peak of the torque curve. For the X in this vid, its a lot more usable like a diesel @2k but peaks around 4-5k
The 2.0 makes 186hp out there ? I have the 2.5l and it makes 186hp lol but mine is a 2017 so that might be why
While they make the same hp the 2.5 makes more torque lower down in the rpm. Americans don’t like to rev the engine out, so brands prioritize that here.
@@abysstoid1503its a sky-x, not a sky-g like most of the world. We never got the x.
@@abysstoid1503interesting take. What countries like to rev their engines out on regular commutes?
I mean i assume most car guys that are into racing (not just stance/aesthetic) like to rev the shit out their cars in general, no matter the country.
My first get 2.0 pulls harder than that
100 kmph or mph?
100 km/h
@@JoeBlack9 Still very impressive
Please put the 0-100 text on top
Which country is this?
Poland
If it’s a manual with good conditions you get sub 7 secs
Sorry, but never.
8,2 sec does this car
Isn’t the 2.0 155hp?
Bro I drive a base line 3 sedan fwd and that shit moooves for 186hp. I’m upgrading to the turbo sedan awd I’m hyped. But u can do so much more then this guys doing in the video if u two step the gas u no lag my friends done it millions of times in his cx-30 and has had no issue. U can control the gears with the pedal in automatic, teach yourself how and you’ll beat cars u shouldn’t.
What do you mean 2step the gas?
You don't know how to lounch and shift my friend
It's automatic
@@WEMBLEYNEwatch his left foot touch the clutch..
I love when asian cars like 180 hp are slower or same like german 140
It’s not 180
No Sport Mode?
This isn’t 186 hp I have the 186 this is the skyactiv x 150 hp not the 2.5 skyactiv g
It's not like 186 horses, my Toyota Yaris 1.5 116 horses would have caught up with the drindulet ahead of faster.
Das ist niemals..die 186 ps Variante..ich fahre ihne selber...ich vermute mal es ist der 150 ps Wagen..die 186 ps waruante klingt auch völlig anders....
Inwiefern klingt der 186PS Motor anders? Wieviel Zeit benötigt er von 0-100?
🙏
Add some turbo charger, and it will be roughly around 7 secs 0-100
You should change at 4000
Mg gt 1.5 turbo 0-100 8.5 seg....
Tam wolno 70 haha 🤠
please test cooking pots only
It's missing the turbo
Jeździłem i powiem tak, nie wiem gdzie te konie są...
realnie to ma mniej koni
С таким весом и мотором она должна 8-8,8 выезжать у меня церато 3 150 лс выезжает от 9,1 пустой до 9,7 гружоный с пассажирами а эта быстрее должна быть
Да никогда CX60 не поедет быстрее со своим весом 2500кг и таким маломощным мотором,у меня Гибридный Лексус на заднем приводе 224 лошади и 300 момента едет 8 секунд при весе 1700кг.
Hay un error en la descripción. El motor 2.0 desarrolla 153 HP. El motor 2.5 desarrolla 186HP.
I have a 2021 Mazda 3 2.0L e skyactiv x it makes 186ps here in the UK.
Aqui el 2.0 es 180PS
I never heard worse gearshift. 10 seconds? Nice crap u did...
I mean, he definitely wasn’t ripping on it like he stole it, but that’s fine. You still get a sense of it’s acceleration on how it will be on the street when you’re shifting smooth and not banging gears. 💪🏻
The generation before that with 2.0 skyactiv manual is 7.8 lol. Learn to shift my man.
I didn't know the 2.0 made 186 horsepower also. I thought it was just the 2.5.
Its 2.5 the 2.0 is 153 bhp
@@kerkuk51991 maybe in USA. Here in Europe the 2.0 ranges from 122 to 186 hp
In Europe 3 starts at 118 bhp. 13-18 model.
There are 2 different 2.0 engines. The Skyactiv-X is the spark-controlled compression-ignition engine. It's very high compression, and gets nearly diesel efficiency from 87 octane gasoline without knocking. It's rated at 186 horsepower, while the regular Skyactiv 2.0 gets anywhere from 120 HP to 155 HP, depending on the application. It has pretty high compression, but doesn't implement compression-ignition.
And now that with a car full of people and luggage, no thanks 😂
the 2.5 makes 186 not the 2.0
The US model is the Skyactiv-G 2.0 2.5 2.5T, the rest of the world has the Skyactiv-X 2.0 which is what's being shown.
O Katowice 🤗
So slow for a 186hp, my diesel Golf 6 (140hp) it takes 9,6
Vitesi geç atıyor.
Bro you can't shift
Tall gearing
It's a Mazda 3 hallmark. I have a 2015 with the 155 hp 2.0, six-speed manual. I can do 35 MPH in first, and just over 60 MPH in second.
Need to improve driving skills for a better result
bro，your gear shifting is a bit slow😂
0 a 100 8,1
🐢
Nah man how can you be this bad this car can do it for 7 seconds if you use some proper shifting
Driver issue
it is fake 186 hp, really maybe 130 hp not more
The worst shifting i ve ever seen…
Ale wiertatrka 😂
Galba
So slow
Slowerr than my grandmas car
You dont know how to shift bro
my 2.5 is wayyyy quicker than this
Very loud
lol.. 185bhp… I have a hairdryer with more power.
Got it going 131 mph for a compact sedan that great.
Kierownica jest obrzydliwa... Taka duża a auto małe
For 180 hp that is bad,golf 150 hp is faster,a lot faster
Too tall or too long gear ratios
Slow af
Der geht ja gar nicht, Lächerlich
Too slow
My + 20yr old Audi TT is laughing at this. And keep in mind, that by now, more than half of those 225 horses are dead.
Audi tt is a shitbox pretending to be a sports car. Mazda 3 is a compact sedan that never claimed to be a sporty car. Go figure
@@thrakro3395 of course it never claimed. It’s a Mazda…doubt they can claim anything at all 😅
@@maybewhoknows7076 rx7/miata's entered the chat
Тупая машина
My Mazda 2 is doing it faster 😅
😂 slow
186hp is SkyG 2.5l figures. 2.0 has 160+hp
I have a 2.0 Skyactiv X . 186 is what is quoted . We do t have the 2.5 in Europe.
Oltre i 6500 giri non va??!!
😂😂😂😮😂 another trash engine from Mazda.
Just shows that you know nothing the Mazda 3 e skyactiv x is the most economical 2.0L petrol engine you can buy, mine does over 60mpg (UK gallons) on a decent run, do your homework before talking nonsense.
@@pillred5974 sure bro 😀I totally believe you 😭😀 are you talking about 2.0l 150 hp? The official consumption is 50 mpg but of course you are doing better. Maybe if you are driving like a granny.
This engine is trash because it's super slow 0-100 km in 10.5 sec.
Terrible considering that Mazda 3 is a small car.
Just for example 1.5 TSI from vag is better in every category - acceleration, fuel consumption, power.....
@@pillred5974 15 years old German diesel is better than this. It truly gives you 60 mpg and it's faster. So don't talk about how amazing this engine is.
@@dantebg100 do you know anything about the 2.0L e skyactiv x? it appears you don't do some research. my car will go from 0 to 60 in 8 seconds. and 64mpg on a run. and it's 186hp.
naw its a good reliable engine for sure
and its not a CVT transmission so that's already a win .maybe the transmission could add another gear and drop the ratios a little bit would speed up the shifting
but you are 100% wrong
Mazda makes good reliable cars any car that has a CVT transmission is automatically considered trash its just facts
🤮unreliable Japanese car brand
Muy buen coche, pero no es un coche para hacer tiempos....😊
My mazda 2 is faster then that