MADI (Pros and Cons) - Digital Audio in Live Sound

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @QuicksilverSG
    @QuicksilverSG 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    MADI isn't necessarily limited to multi-track point-A to point-B signal routing. A MADI stage box can easily replicate its digital signals, eliminating the need for expensive and troublesome analog snake splitter cables. It can also support master/slave console priority, making it easy to use an on-stage monitor mixer on the same MADI router with a remote FOH console.

  • @LaminarSound
    @LaminarSound 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    MADI seems much more stable and reliable. We had plenty of issues with Dante at my church for a while and when you have to freaking log in and jack around with routing parameters and the Dante network router just randomly says eff you, it seems needlessly complicated. MADI is point to point basically. No logging in. No passwords or accounts required. Just connect and configure routing and walk away. I do see the plus side of Dante it just requires so much work on the front end and you better have solid network connections.

  • @Alex_Martz
    @Alex_Martz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hi Scott, why did you removed all the recent videos from the Eras tour?, those had super valuable information!

    • @theproductionacademy
      @theproductionacademy  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      hey sorry i had to take them down. email me at scott at theproductionacademy dot com and i can explain why.

    • @Alex_Martz
      @Alex_Martz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@theproductionacademy Ok thanks Scott!

  • @gffg387
    @gffg387 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MADI her? I barely know her. LMAO!

  • @Alex_Martz
    @Alex_Martz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for putting more of these advanced topics!