Try arguing with flat earthers, same thing. it seems that more and more people are mentally unstable nowadays, it would not take a lot to tip over and get an all out cannibal zombie apocalypse.
When James VI of Scotland became the King of England he did not create one Kingdom. The two kingdoms remained politically separate and the two countries shared one monarch. In 1707 with the Act of Union the two Parliaments were united creating the Kingdom of Great Britain. 1800 Ireland joined the Union creating the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. In 1923 the majority of Ireland left the union except for several northern Irish counties and the nation was then, as now, called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Your depiction of a WHITE KING JAMES IS HISTORICALLY INCORRECT...WHY? YOU viewers would be wise to seek CORRECT HISTORICAL ACCURATE INFORMATION titled. KING JAMES: The Black King who had the Bible translated into ENGLISH by. The BLACK EXCELLENCE CH.
He didn't rewrite to Bible.He translated it from latin to English.It was forbidden to to that before he was King.He said that all poeple have the God given right to view the Bible for themselves instead of trusting a catholic Bishop or another person telling them what was written.He made the Bible available for everyone!What a ever-changing decision for the better:)
@@CurtisD01 They are far worse than flat earthers. It's one thing to deny credible science, but to claim that Scottish people have black skin just so you can steal their historical achievements is another thing all together. Just travel to Scotland lmao
James VI of Scotland and James I of England James VI of Scotland (June 19, 1566 - March 27, 1625, reigned July 24, 1567 - March 27, 1625) became James I of England and Ireland (reigned March 24, 1603-March 27, 1625) and was the first king of both England and Scotland. He also held the title of King of France, as had all his predecessors in the English throne since October 21, 1422, although by his time the title didn't come with an active claim of this throne. James succeeded Elizabeth I as the closest living relative of the unmarried childless English monarch, through his descent from one of Henry VIII's sisters. King James Crowned at the Age of One Prince James became King of Scotland on July 24, 1567, at the age of 13 months, after his mother Mary, Queen of Scots was forced to abdicate. Mary fled to England, where she was imprisoned for the next 19 years. His father, Lord Darnley, had died in mysterious circumstances shortly after James was born. James was formally crowned at the Church of the Holy Rood, Stirling on July 29, 1567. In accordance to the religious atmosphere of the time, he was brought up as a Scottish Presbyterian, though his mother had been a Roman Catholic. King James - from Scotland to England James inherited the throne of England after the death of his mother's cousin, Queen Elizabeth I. James was never a very popular monarch among the people of England. He laid much of the groundwork that would eventually lead to the beheading of his heir Charles I during the English Civil War, but because of his political skills, his rule was relatively stable. James married Anne of Denmark by proxy on August 20, 1589, and in person on November 23, 1589 and again in person in January 21, 1590. They had eight children, of whom only three lived beyond infancy: Henry, Prince of Wales- (February 19, 1594 - November 6, 1612), Elizabeth Stuart - (August 19, 1596 - February 13, 1662), and King Charles I of England, Scotland and Ireland - (November 19, 1600 - January 30, 1649). James dissolved the English Parliament on February 8, 1622, following a dispute involving parliamentary criticisms of a marriage proposed by James, of his son Charles to Princess Maria Anna of Spain. King James was quoted as saying, "Monarchy is the greatest thing on earth. Kings are rightly called gods since just like God they have power of life and death over all their subjects in all things. They are accountable to God only ... so it is a crime for anyone to argue about what a king can do." King James is considered to have been one of the most intellectual and learned individuals ever to sit on any English or Scottish throne. He is primarily remembered for authorizing the production of the King James Version of the Bible, the highly popular English translation from Greek and Hebrew, which remains the most printed book in the history of the world, with over one billion copies in print. King James had nothing to do with the translating the Bible, he merely authorized it and provided financing for its production. Beyond that, however, James wrote several books himself.
I am with you !!! Thanks so much I studied England and french history!!!! So proud to see someone who knows what he is talking about. I know all your wrote is the truth. To understand all this this people need a history book to read at least 3 years. It took me two years I started all the way from 13th century up to the revolution time. I know the touching history of Mary queen of Scot. That is her son king of England and Scot.!!!!!!
As a historian if James I was gay I want to know that he was gay, not suppress the truth. But from the little research I've done on that part (not of real extreme importance to me) I don't find the "evidence" to be very convincing at all. The man might have been a little overly sensitive in the way he wrote and addressed his male companions but I find that hardly grounds to label him gay. In fact I don't find many of his "questionable" actions to be that uncommon in his day and age.
Firstly, everyone here saying words like "gay" and "homo" would be strictly incorrect... There's a difference between gay and bisexual that you clearly don't get... Secondly, nowhere in this doco does it mention that James I's parents were half-cousins! James I's parents were Henry Stuart (Lord Darnley) and Mary Queen of Scots. Henry's mother and Mary's father were half-siblings, children of Margaret Tudor (the elder sister of Henry VIII).
You cough when you smoke. Coughing worsens and can cause you to fall ill which means he’s suffered it and came to the conclusion. I call it common sense.
@@ahmedsheikh2977 See you say this, but then why did 99% of the rest of the world at the time struggle to come to this "obviously simple" conclusion? Surely if it were so blatant it wouldn't have taken society so many generations & deaths to have realised that smoking is deadly...
"Openly bisexual" isn't accurate at all. He may have flaunted his love for men, but his (probable) sexual interest in men wasn't confessed or publicly displayed.
This "man", gave us all a gift, a priceless gift. The King James Bible is the Armor of God. The language is precise and unchanging, does not take the lords name in vain(means changing the meanings of the word). It is in every Court Room in the Commonwealth. Ecclesiasites 8/4:Where the word of a king is, there is power:and who may say unto him. What doest thou.The King of Kings, THERE IS NO HIGHER POWER ON EARTH. Your belief is not required for this to be true. Thank you Marcus.
King James 'gave us all' nothing... he had nothing to do with the translation of the bible into English... (yet one more in a long line of English bibles).. he simply oversaw yet ONE more translation into English... to shut the miserable puritans up more than anything... puritans he loathed by the way... it was translated into English for English speakers in his realm of England... not Scotland nor Ireland nor Wales...who were all overwhelmingly gaelic speakers...not the French, nor the Italians, the Spanish or the Germans, nor the Norwegians or any other race or natonality.. England at the time was but a bit player on the world stage... with a population of about two million ... overshadowed by the (then) mightier kingdoms of France and Spain.. and religious intolerance post reformation was NOTORIOUS throughout the continent.. not only between Catholic and Protestant but also between the various protestant sects that has sprung up all over the place... James like every other European monarch called the shots as to what religion their subjects followed... and in England's case the ONLY accepted form of religion allowed was the CHURCH OF ENGLAND...Anabaptists... the forerunners of todays Baptists were particularly loathed.. in fact James persecuted them so fiercely that they were obliged to escape England (the so called 'pilgrim fathers;) along with other puritanical sects and make for the new world..
thing are held up by their foundation the king James bible inspired by god Jesus teaching are great but man changed the bible to control you free your mind and your ass will follow
They realize that King James is pretty recent history. 1650 wasn't that long ago. If King James was black why do all of his children look like fucking Howdy Doodie.
Jonathan Mosher there is no IF King James was black. He was 100% white. What some selfhating black Americans who wished they were white claim is irrelevant.
Mary Strand: Unfortunately for your delusions.... the genealogy of royalty is there for all to see and study.... they intermarried over and over and over again throughout the centuries and are very inbred....and nope... there has NEVER been any mention of any 'black' person intermarrying into European royalty throughout the centuries... and definitely NEVER a single solitary mention of any 'negroid black african' EVER in any royal annals or genealogical trees and records …even DNA studies of royal skeletal remains and those of their countless millions of descendants alive today (which includes nearly ALL current Europeans …. myself included over and over and over again) has shown NO African DNA or even TRACES of any such DNA...so sorry love.... you are not related to us....your ancestry lies firmly, squarely and entirely in sub Saharan Africa....
It's really scary how people can completely ignore reality and truth they don't like these days. I honestly struggle to understand how their minds work; how can you completely ignore facts and images that are front of you, how can you dismiss them out of hand with no thought what-so-ever, how can you be so completely deluded that you cannot tell the difference between reality and your own wishes? King James was NOT black. He simply wasn't. There is nothing to dispute, no grand cover up. You simply listened to someone who is either a troll or deluded themselves into believing their own lies. You were tricked, the images that show King James as black ARE NOT images of King James. They are portraits of black people that someone mislabeled to spread a lie. You were lied to when you were told he was black, it is not true. I can't believe I actually have to say that, but apparently I do. There is a reason this is all happening now, and so suddenly, because it is a fucking hoax. But instead of realizing this, you people double down on the lie, you refuse to accept the reality that you are wrong when ALL OF THE VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE shows that you are. You believe in the lie until your last breath instead of accepting the truth. And worse yet, you perpetuate it, you spread it around to others. You figure that if you dupe enough people, that if you yell loud enough, people will believe that you are right. And somehow it fucking works, because some people are ignorant enough and stupid enough to buy it, and those same people are insecure enough to deny the truth once they have latched on to an idea, because they cannot handle being wrong. It is insane. You people are fucking scary. Seriously. You do not live in the real world, you live in a deluded fantasy and you get angry when anyone tries to snap you out of it. Which would be tolerable if you didn't insist on trying to spread your insanity to others. Others who don't know any better. That is not good at all, because people like that cannot be reasoned with, they cannot be saved and they cannot be helped. God help the human race, we are going backwards. I don't understand how, but we are. And you insane fuckers are part of the cause. We are in for some sad times unless our education systems start getting better. I'm not a racist person. Skin color isn't the problem here, even though it is a particular race that is causing the most damage. The real problem is ignorance and insecurity. Uneducated people believing the first thing they hear because it makes them feel better, it makes them feel special. They then fight for that feeling because they are too insecure to handle being wrong about it, and the underlying anger against white people makes it easy for them to delude themselves into believing their own fantasy. Like I said before, this is scary shit. And it will not end well for the uneducated liars if they don't start accepting reality. It makes me sad, because none of it has to be this way. If people would only be just a little bit reasonable... **sigh**
Contemporary References to King James I in Shakespeare's Macbeth (1605-06) One can connect Shakespeare's patron, King James I, to almost every significant dramatic alteration Shakespeare made to his source material on the historical Macbeth, as we can see in Shakespeare's Sources for Macbeth. But fascinating contemporary references and compliments to James also are found throughout the play. The two-fold balls and treble sceptres (4.1) is a reference to the double coronation of James, at Scone and Westminster, and the most overt homage to James in the play. The balls or globes "were the royal insignia which King James bore in right of his double kingship of England and Scotland, and the three sceptres were those of his three kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland" (Lilian Winstanley, Macbeth, King Lear and Contemporary History). Another obvious tribute to James is Malcolm's reference to the evil (4.3) or scrofula, which James believed he could cure by his touch; a power supposedly inherited from Edward the Confessor. A probable allusion to the Gunpowder Plot to assassinate James can be found in Lady Macbeth's words, look like the innocent flower, but be the serpent under't (1.5) and even more riveting is an allusion to a Jesuit priest named Father Henry Garnet, who had concealed his knowledge of the conspiracy: Faith, here’s an equivocator, that could swear in both the scales against either scale; who committed treason enough for God’s sake, yet could not equivocate to heaven. O, come in, equivocator. (2.3) Macbeth also, more so than any of Shakespeare's works, is overflowing with Biblical imagery, and, of course, one of King James's great passions was Scripture, culminating in the King James Version of the Bible in 1611. Another of James's interests was witchcraft, and woven into Macbeth are portions of James's own book on the subject, Daemonologie. It is not surprising that Shakespeare aimed to please James. Shortly after his arrival in London, James insisted that Shakespeare's troupe come under his own patronage, giving them unlimited opportunities and making Shakespeare a wealthy man. More on the King's Men...
Okay, I have to speak on this... Queen Elizabeth II is a direct descendant of Mary, Queen of Scots. Mary, Queen of Scots ruled Scotland from 1542 to 1567. Her son, James VI and I, was both King of Scotland and King of England and Ireland, and was the first ruler of the House of Stuart. His daughter was Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia. Elizabeth Stuart's daughter was Sophia of Hanover, who was the mother of George I of Great Britain, who was the first ruler of the House of Hanover. His son was George II of Great Britain, whose son was Frederick, Prince of Wales. Frederick's son was George III, who was king during the American Revolution. He had a son named Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn. His daughter was Queen Victoria, who was the mother of Edward VII, who was the first ruler of the House of Windsor. Edward was George V's father, who was the king during World War I. His song was George VI, who was the king during World War II. And his daughter was Queen Elizabeth II. So, even though there have been three different houses who ruled England since the time of Mary, Queen of Scots, (the Stuarts, the Hanovers, and now the Windsors), Elizabeth II is a great-granddaughter 11 times over of Mary, Queen of Scots. So the question is.... When did Queen Elizabeth II became black?
@@fromthefather8349 this is what you said i.e I quote: From the father . 1 day ago @ogbabyace I know you eat doodoo and drink piss. Africans do that you know?--- From the father
@@ogbabyace I told you that the first humans of the planet were black, you said it was idiotic. You aint shit like leperous skin freak white race you kmow nothing about.
If James was openly Gay,then WHY would anyone TRUST his Authorization of the Bible? Doesn't the Bible speak that Lying with your own Sex is an Abomination?🤔😯😮
Ernest Dabster, James was king... nobody calls kings to task lol.... besides the nobles were too busy vying for his attention by parading the handsome young men of their individual houses before him in a desperate bid to gain ascendancy over him... its called ambition,,,
King James...The Queen of England, who also was a bit _too friendly_ with animals This is the man who made his own version of the bible, the one you currently use. Think about that
Nothing of his own beliefs were added. It's just an English translation under his approval. He was the king after all. He's only credited for it. He didn't write it.
@@SpitFactsAndThenDontReply he definitely rewrote certain things to fit the Romain agenda the etheotpian bible the oldest one and it’s different and fits the agenda of etheopians.... all books have a certain agenda with different versions
He was swart (adj.) Old English sweart "black, dark," of night, clouds, also figurative, "wicked, infamous," from Proto-Germanic *swarta- (source also of Old Frisian, Old Saxon, and Middle Dutch swart, Dutch zwart, Old Norse svartr, German schwarz, Gothic swarts "dark-colored, black"), from PIE root *swordo- "dirty, dark, black" (source of sordid). The true Germanic word, surviving in the Continental languages but displaced in English by black. Of skin color of persons from late 14c. Related: Swartest.
Alan Mac: No... James was neither a popular ruler over here in the UK nor an 'influential one'... he is and remains overshadowed in British history by his great predecessor and cousin Elizabeth I and her father in turn King Henry VIII...
One of the great ironies of history is that Elizabeth I's successor was the son of the woman she had executed some years before. "What goes around comes around". .... But it is still good to be KING, regardless...
I don’t think she cared who would rule after her. This she didn’t name who she wanted. I think she new it would be James and she was ok with that. Mary would have been a horrible leader. Thus there wouldn’t have been a golden age .
sorry but at 1:24 it was claimed that Britain was united in a single Kingdom, WRONG while it may have had a single monarch the two kingdoms remained separate until the act of union under James; Grandaughter Anne in 1707.
I don't which king James you're talking about but the first king of England who also ruled Scotland and north Ireland was a black man named king James. Shocking isn't it. He is also the King James that had the Bible translated into English around 1603.
@@danielm3326 For one it's not hear say. Two, there were white King James but the one who translated the Bible. Three this is my history and I am white and from your childish comment you don't know much about your own history.
@@danielm3326 Sweetie grow up. Yes, like I said, there were white ones. But the first and the one who translated the bible into English was black. Sorry honey, I'm 1/4 Scottish, Irish, French and German so it is my history. I still have relatives Scotland and Germany. So from what I gather from your comments you're a little American girl who is hooked on being white and not happy with her life. Look around you, the world is made of more colors than white.
@@fromthefather8349 King James is white not Black. Stop with this bullshit camp talk. His whole generation of family is white. Nice try but he is a EUROPEAN who funded the slave trade with his brother and made tons if profit from it.
fooledbyasmile I suggest you pick up the book king James and the reunion of Christendom. The real story of a black man that ruled Scotland and other parts of Europe.
@@judahmourneth3211 I suggest you read books that are peer-reviewed and written by legitimate historians. James Stuart (James I of England and VI of Scotland) was of Scottish birth, his parents were most of British origin, with some French and Spanish ancestry. All documentation of James I & VI, all accounts, and all we know of his background points to a Bisexual White Guy. Anything else is fabricated bullshit.
fooledbyasmile after Rome fell the nobility’s of Europe were black people. The Franks, the lombards, the celts all black people. The anglo-Saxons...that’s why you look up the word ENGLAND it means “land of the angles” (black people) Europe (Europe) was the daughter of a Phoenician Kings. The Phoenicians were Africans.
fooledbyasmile the serfs, peasants or “villiens” worked the land for the Black nobility’s...(Caucasian) ...That’s where you get the term “landlord” because they were lords over the lands and lords over “white people”
His Mother, Queen of Scots a Scottish woman by blood, French raised was white. His father lord Darnley, an English aristocrat was white, how tf is he black? Lol cmon
05:17 "hamrful to the brain"??? Did they have knowledge of the brain and lungs, enough to know what (and what way) a deed was harmful? such as smoking? but how? this was during the time of medical "bleeding-out" was it not? They had no knowledge as to the harm "bleeding" someone had on the body, let alone the brain. just asking....
Although their medicine was rudimentary, people back then understood a lot more about how the body works than we think today. Nicotine causes a tingling sensation in the brain and people coughing because they smoked would have been as common then as now, thus they already knew that it was bad for the lungs. While it is true that they did not know for certain that the heart pumps blood around the body, they suspected that this was the case and it was proved scientifically by William Harvey, who was actually one of James' personal physicians and who published his findings only three years after the King's death.
there are many denominations of Christianity around the world, and in every single one there are gay followers no matter how much hate is preached, also king James was a "king" in his era being a homo wasn't popular considering priest beforehand belittled it in ignorance, with his friends he could have been as open as he wanted, but in the public eye its a different story, i found your comment very idle and dull, perhaps comprehend eras of social understandings and benevolence before criticism.
@@rattyvlogger8138 umm its not really a secret. I was just born and thats pretty much it. It doesnt make me royalty so theres nothing amazing about it expect I have his blood. I found all this out a month ago too
@@rattyvlogger8138 gee idk rat let me just grab my handy dandy time machine real quick and make my way over so I can ask and then come back and tell you
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
diminished comet make sure that you're right for putting this on TH-cam. Remember you will answer for everything you do on this Earth that will lead people in error.
People fighting to claim ol cheating,swings both ways,murdering,sugar daddy to his young male lovers ,alcoholic,woman torturing,didn't go to his own son's funeral- King James,cos he did some editing of a book!Religion is one hell of a drug!
This is my direct line, I am a direct decent any of both Lord Darnly as well as James the brother of Mary Queen of Scotts and their father King James. I can see that the Scottish side does go back to that line said to be chosen and does go back to the ancient world, however "Black" is an extreme and inaccurate description! the other side decendened from Lord Darnly (King James's father) and is English who is not Black in any way as far as I can tell.
You may be a relative of mine? I am descended from his Mistress Lady Margaret of Erskine who at the time was married to Lord Dundas of Arniston. However, her last two children where recognised in court as his???
"Having been raised in Scotland he was rather baffled by the idea of Common Law," who wrote this rubbish? There is such a thing as Scottish Common Law.
King James wasn't white, he was a black man, and 1st King of England, Scotland, and North Island. And he was very popular as a King due to him wanting his subjects to be educated and for translating the Bible into english for everyone to use. He was also the long standing ancestor of Henry the 8th.
@Wyneze4sheeze 02 ..U NEED TO DO YOUR RESEARCH...I BET U THINK IRISH PEOPLE IS ALL PALE PEOPLE IN THAT ERA..IN FACT THEY WAS MELANIN PEOPLE..IN FACT..IF U GO TO IRELAND..U STILL SEE MELANIN PICTURES OF MELANIN PEOPLE ...WE RAN EUROPE IN THAT ERA UNTIL OUR FALL...IT'S ALL IN THE UNVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE ..IN BLACK &WHITE....WHAT U NEED TO UNDERSTAND....THERE WAS ALOT OF "WHITE WASHING " IN THEM DAYS..AND STILL GOING ON IN TODAY'S WORLD...THE ORIGIN OF THE FIRST MAN WILL ALWAYS BE THE FIRST..AND ALWAYS BE THE LAST...STANDING ON THIS PLANET...FACT !!!
Hahaha King James was white from the house of Stuart son of Mary Queen of Scots And Henry Stuart he was the nephew of Henry the VIII he had his portrait painted twice his sons had their portraits painted and they also were involved in the Trans Atlantic slave trade and king James the second his grandson is having his portrait removed from parliament because of his Ties to chattel slavery. And you claim they were black. Stop embarrassing yourself. You have no clue about our history and are clearly jealous.
@@reginaldbrownmusic8356 Europe, Britain and Ireland has been white since the early Neolithic period. And the DNA haplogroups prove it. Ireland only has a black population of 1 percent to this day. Britain 3 percent Wales and Scotland 1 percent.
In 1611 when King James translated the bible, a Leda and the swan statue was erected in Copenhagen,Denmark, the Kalmar War begins in Norway, Kristianopel is besieged by the Swedes, Fort Belgica is built by the Dutch, Machilipatnam is established by the British Empire, The city of Henricus is founded in Virginia by the English, a charterhouse school is established in England, Arras College is established in France, Couvent des Jacobins de la rue Saint-Honore is founded, the French Oratory is founded, Louis xiii is the monarch of France, Ellwangen witch trials begin in Germany, the Perpetual Edict is established in Southern Netherlands, Palatinate-Lutzelstein-Guttenberg is established, Irish parliament is established, the Sejm of 1611 takes place in Warsaw, Tsar Vasily IV of Russia pays tribute to King Sigismund III Vasa of Poland, Oratory of Saint Philip Neri is established in the Papal States, Fort San Lucia is established in Malta, Count of Miranda do Corvo is created, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth besieges Smolensk, Convento de San Norberto, Hermitage of St. Simon, and Iglesias del Buen Suceso is established by Spain, Kingdom of Sweden begins, Swedish conquest of Korela forest, Sweden has an armistice with Poland, Gothenburg is burned by the Danes, the Polish-Swedish War ends in a truce.
King James was indeed a black man as was his Son King Charles and grandson King Charles II. I stumbled across a book written in Memoirs of the Secret Services of John Macky. This book describes King Charles, his sons, and grandsons as Black Men. It also describes the wealthiest Europeans of the time as black. This book is available at University of Pennsylvania and the New York Public Library. Additionally, the UK National Archives has ship manifests of Jacobite prisoners. They were mostly black people. Not only that, the father James I and VI was Lord Henry Darnley, a black man. His portrait is in the National Portrait Gallery and other places. It’s pretty clear nowadays that you all are in denial and don’t know what you’re talking about. If you’re going to attack black people and attempt to steal our history, you should do more research and debunk these first-hand, primary accounts and portraits. 😊
@@optimvsprinceps1845 Then why was his family described as black? Why was King Charles, his grandson described as black? Why does Lord Darnley look like a black man in his portrait? Why were all the Jacobites noted as black, brown, etc on the ship manifests. It’s likely that King James was a black man of mixed descent as were many of the elites during that time as Moors and aboriginals bred with whites.
I do find it somewhat charming that some black people will ignore every other portrait of a historical figure, but based on one drawing with a shaded style declare to the world "AY LAWD DARNLEY WUZ A NIGGA!"
@Thy word is light that's not what the photo in the original 1611 shows. Your time is up. Israel has awaken. The white washing has come to an end. Don't be mad Jesus was black you nimrod lover 😆
@@S.H-J83 KING James the 1st of England was originally King James the 6th of Scotland. He was the son of a black father and a colored mother both of royal blood. In 1565, Queen Mary was married by her cousin, a black Scottish man of the royal family who was called Darnley. Darnley was killed in 1567 by the white rivals of the Queen, but he had left Queen Mary a male heir of her own lineage. Queen Mary’s son was born a few months before his father’s murder and he was named James the 6th. James the 6th was, therefore, the son of a black man and a colored woman.
@@IAMDC144 ..NOW THEY KNOW WHY THERE EMPIRE IS FALLEN IN FRONT OF THERE EYE...THEY BELIEVE THERE OUR HYPE,LOL BUT..THESE 3 YEARS WILL OPEN UP THERE EYES......AND THEY MIGHT KNEE DOWN TO U...ONCES THEY FOUND OUT WHO IS YOUR "FATHER" !!! LET THEM HAVE THERE LAST FUN ..202+2 IS AROUND THE CORNER !!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@mastercontrol2461 Hahaha King James was white from the house of Stuart son of Mary Queen of Scots And Henry Stuart he was the nephew of Henry the VIII he had his portrait painted twice his sons had there portraits painted and they also were involved in the Trans Atlantic slave trade and king James the second his grandson is having his portrait removed from parliament because of his Ties to chattel slavery. And you claim they were black. Stop embarrassing yourself.
The Stuart line of monarchs were among the most controversial in their own time. Although their matriarch, Mary Queen of Scots (1542-1567), was beheaded, her son King James I (1566-1625) unified the Scottish and English crowns in 1603. Despite the English Civil War and a twelve-year interregnum, a total of six (6) monarchs were crowned from the paternity of Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley of Scotland (1545-1567). This Y-DNA linage can be traced further back to Robert II of Scotland (1316-1390), Walter FitzAlan (1106-1177) and Alan FitzFlaad (1070-1114) who came from Brittany, France as a knight in Norman service. Because Brittany was settled (and named) by displaced Celts from Britain in the 5th century, this lineage is thought to be anciently Celtic. Although the Stuart line of British monarchs ended with the death of Queen Anne in 1714, there are several living Dukes and other Peers who are patrilinealy descended from King Charles II (1630-1685).12 Thus, the Stuarts could easily return to the throne if a female Mountbatten heiress were to marry a Stuart male in the future. The recent birth of a male Prince Cambridge, however, makes the possibility of returning a Stuart to the throne unlikely for the 21st century. Thanks to an energetic DNA project12and the participation of many Stuart / Stewart descendants, the Stuart Y-DNA signature is the best-studied of all the British monarchs. Figures 3 and 5 include test result highlights for the Stuarts based on an identified ducal descendant of King Charles II.20 Their Y-DNA is characterized as part of haplogroup R1b-L21 with the key SNP mutation L745. This R1b-L21 result is consistent with the Celtic attribution of the Stuart’s 11th century patriarch. MALE LINE DESCENT OF THE HOUSE OF STEWART/STUART R1b-L21 (R1b CELTIC LINE) SIR ALAN FITZ FLAAD OF BRITTANY Father of SIR WALTER FITZALAN Father of SIR ALAN FITZWALTER 2nd HIGH STEWARD Father of SIR WALTER STEWARD/STEWART 3rd HIGH STEWARD Father of SIR ALEXANDER STEWART 4th HIGH STEWARD Father of SIR JOHN STEWART OF BONKYLL Father of SIR ALAN STEWART OF DREGHORN Father of SIR ALEXANDER STEWART OF DARNLEY Father of SIR ALEXANDER STEWART OF DARNLEY Father of SIR JOHN STEWART OF DARNLEY Father of SIR ALAN STEWART OF DARNLEY Father of JOHN STEWART 1st EARL OF LENNOX Father of MATTHEW STEWART 2nd EARL OF LENNOX Father of JOHN STEWART 3rd EARL OF LENNOX Father of MATTHEW STEWART 4th EARL OF LENNOX Father of HENRY STEWART/STUART LORD DARNLEY Father of KING JAMES VI & I
@@projectpoetry6891 THERE is NO more 'info' on Ellen More or 'Black Margaret'..... that is it in its entirety... a brief mention in a court report of finances and around this you have manged to weave a WHOLE fantasy.... THAT is what CHILDREN do.... grow up.... with each post you write you are simply making a bigger fool of yourself on the public stage and showing the watching world the intelligence of the average african american,... the MAIN male line Y DNA of Great Britain and Ireland ... indeed the WHOLE of WESTERN EUROPE was and remains R1b... a FACT... an indisputable FACT... NO NEGROID SKULL has EVER been unearthed in ANY ANCIENT GRAVE over here.. a FACT....an indisputable FACT...the mtDNA lineages of Great Britain and Ireland .... indeed the WHOLE OF WESTERN EUROPE was and remains confined to just SEVEN female Lineages... J or K or H or T or U or W or X... FACT... indisputable FACT... the current populations today in Great Britain and Ireland are the flesh and blood DIRECT genetic heirs... both ROYAL and COMMONER of our Anglo Saxon, Celtic, Basque, Viking and French Norman ancestors... a FACT...an indisputable FACT... NO SUB SAHARAN AFRICAN DNA has EVER been found either in ancient skeletal remains OR in the current populations over here in the UK and Ireland...NONE..not a drop...not a single solitary strand.... NOW what YOU have to do is provide YOUR OWN genetic, historical, anthropological, scientific, archaeological PRIMARY original FACTS to disprove ANY of the above INDISPUTABLE FACTS ... THAT is what ADULTS do in the big grown uo world outside your ghetto... and until you can do that you are simply showing the entire planet how stupid YOU personally are and, as a representative of your race how stupid african americans truly are...
@@eenor71 One:"caucasoid"..."negroid". Simpleton, those corporate terms of designation mean little to nothing to me. I suggest you save that for your conversations with your fellow Göttingen School of History underlings. As, that terminology has nothing to do with the amount of melanin one has in their skin ... but rather the shape of the skull (dolicocephalic vs brachy vs meso) the contours of the jawline (prognathous vs orthognathoius) and the shape of the nose (aquiline vs flat)...among a myriad of other things. however, like ive stated, those terms men nothing in the context of your request....as we DONT HAVE ANY OF KING JAMES' SKELETAL STRUCTURE TO ANALYZE. Two: Like wise... Ill be waiting for you to show me an Xray Validated, unaltered image of King James that Thomas Cromwell and his filthy minions didnt get their paws on. www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/11361080/Thomas-Cromwell-was-the-Islamic-State-of-his-day.html "And then there is his impact on this country’s artistic and intellectual heritage. No one can be sure of the exact figure, but it is estimated that the destruction started and legalised by Cromwell AMOUNTED TO 97% of OF THE ENGLISH ART THEN IN EXISTENCE. Statues were hacked down. Frescoes were smashed to bits. Mosaics were pulverized. Illuminated manuscripts were shredded. Wooden carvings were burned. Precious metalwork was melted down. Shrines were reduced to rubble. This vandalism went way beyond a religious reform. It was a frenzy, obliterating the artistic patrimony of centuries of indigenous craftsmanship with an intensity of hatred for imagery and depicting the divine that has strong and resonant parallels today." Three: As those of us that are INFORMED are more than aware of the fact that your recessive/mutated genetic (Blond hair, blue eyes) Horite ancestors enjoyed commissioning authentic imagery to be repainted over or outright destroyed once they came into power. See Example........ Johann I (1468-1532), the Constant, Elector of Saxony (1532-33) Before X-ray: qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-c32b75daae5503549d2ea9411f9ce7ed Post X-Ray qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-82d7eac04e3473f0e662184dacf26b4d Clearly an altered work... oh yeah...and here a COIN of the real King James qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2dae40a205e12979c35b1267dadb2478 So please....spare me the malarkey and the plethora of google images that make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside when you seek to validate what misinformation you have been inculcated with as concerning the historical King James. If you want to believe the narrative...thats one thing. But for you to troll the comment section as much as you do, antagonizing people who dont want to accept the narrative...is sottish at best. Carry on...youve been addressed once, and thats all the attention you'll get from me. Proverbs 26:4-5 King James Version 4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. 5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
@@dcogent1 STILL waiting for YOU to show us the bibles YOUR ancestors in west and central africa were using before being given it (in european languages of course lol)...by your european slave masters... where are the churches, the cathedrals, the illuminated manuscripts. the gospels and books of hours???? Show us the magnificent christian artwork from the earliest centuries a.d..... show us the gothic splendour of YOUR tribal ancestors religious foundations... the perpenicular or Romansque beauty only to be found in europe.... created by european christians for their fellow european christians over the past two thousand years... go on... i dare you lol...
Love letters between James and Buckingham and description of many people at talking how James kissed, caressed Buckingham in public. Also he said he love Buckingham to parliament
Sir John Oglander observed that he "never yet saw any fond husband make so much or so great dalliance over his beautiful spouse as I have seen King James over his favourites, especially the Duke of Buckingham"[135] whom the King would, recalled Sir Edward Peyton, "tumble and kiss as a mistress."[136] Restoration of Apethorpe Palace undertaken in 2004-08 revealed a previously unknown passage linking the bedchambers of James and Villiers
James was openly bisexual and as the King he wouldn't need to hide this. This was also not so rare among 'royalty'. Back then, the saying was 'women are for making babies and men are for fun'. He had several gay lovers including George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham and Robert Carr, 1st Earl of Somerset. He also had a mistress named Anne Murray. So much for that 'cleave unto your wife' that was included in the Bible that he paid for. As for contemporary history, there is no evidence of him being gay, and plenty of evidence that he was bisexual and also cheated on his wife. Also note that King James was black. Both of his parents were black with his mother being royalty. But thanks to Euro-white washing, he was painted as a white man. James was also a 'witch hunter', killing people that were accused of being a witch. Most people that hate this are religious people that believe in the Bible for no good reason other than they were raised to believe it, and without evidence.
@@denisemilfort4581 have you ever asked who painted this, when and where? Our do u just accept information from anyone no matter what lol. 9/10 any depiction you see of KING JAMES and most European rulers pre renaissance are white washed versions. Similar to white JESUS they create idolic monuments thru busts or paintings to implant the IDEA that these were so called caucasian. Kind of dumb to use 300-400 year old paintings to justify your belief of how someone looked.
He was not gay and he was not black. Funny how any description of relationships between men of antiquity are always revised in order to fit the alphabet community's agenda. People need more friends these days.
To all those blacks claiming James was black. He wasn’t he was a white Celt. The only black part of the royal family is George III’s wife Charlotte who had black ancestry.
Stunner 900 ....Nope... yet more african american fantasy... Charlotte was not black, nor remotely black, nor of ANY black ancestry.... she was the blue eyed light brown haired germanic wife of the pro slavery King George III... the king of Britain at the height of Britain's involvement in the slave trade to the americas of black africans...
@@Vater1 He DIDN'T write the bible you plank.... the bible was the bible from its inception and amalgamation (old and new testaments under one cover) in the first centuries A.D.... and was the cornerstone of European law, religion and culture from that time onwards....King James simply OVERSAW its translation into English for HIS English speaking subjects and no one else.... he didn't translate it himself or have any part in its translation... nor was this the FIRST translation into English... the Tyndale, the Bishop's bible and the Geneva bible were already in print and had been for over a century ... nor indeed is his overseen English version bible actually CALLED the 'King James bible'... it is actually called the AUTHORISED VERSION... and what do we mean by 'authorised'??? it means AUTHORISED by the Anglican Church (The Church of England)... the Church James was supreme Head of, a title EVERY successive British ruler maintains to this very day... our current Queen Elizabeth II is the head of the church at present...
WTF is wrong with these comments?
Try arguing with flat earthers, same thing. it seems that more and more people are mentally unstable nowadays, it would not take a lot to tip over and get an all out cannibal zombie apocalypse.
When James VI of Scotland became the King of England he did not create one Kingdom. The two kingdoms remained politically separate and the two countries shared one monarch. In 1707 with the Act of Union the two Parliaments were united creating the Kingdom of Great Britain. 1800 Ireland joined the Union creating the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. In 1923 the majority of Ireland left the union except for several northern Irish counties and the nation was then, as now, called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Absolutely ..💯
Your depiction of a WHITE KING JAMES IS HISTORICALLY INCORRECT...WHY? YOU viewers would be wise to seek CORRECT HISTORICAL ACCURATE INFORMATION titled. KING JAMES: The Black King who had the Bible translated into ENGLISH by. The BLACK EXCELLENCE CH.
@@louisspann3994 wtf are you on about ?? 😆
@@clairepeace5783r u hating on the dark Israelites? God forbid you speak with a putrid mouth 🤬😡
Anyone else spend more time reading the comments than watching the video...?
Frankly, yes. New people and stimulating chat on every forum :
@@DrCorvid yeah same, I don't feel good about it though. Stimulating is the word I would have used.
Kings James was the last black king. All you'll history was white was to play with the real people in the Bible. I have facts.
@Doctor Tesla🤔
@Doctor Tesla you shieeeeet!
He didn't rewrite to Bible.He translated it from latin to English.It was forbidden to to that before he was King.He said that all poeple have the God given right to view the Bible for themselves instead of trusting a catholic Bishop or another person telling them what was written.He made the Bible available for everyone!What a ever-changing decision for the better:)
But I understood, that He translated it from Greek and from Aramea. Not from Latin, no!!
The Black Israelites have arrived 🤣🤣🤣
They're actually nuts, like just making up bollocks..... they're legit
Iike flat earthers
@@CurtisD01 They are far worse than flat earthers. It's one thing to deny credible science, but to claim that Scottish people have black skin just so you can steal their historical achievements is another thing all together. Just travel to Scotland lmao
@@spinaltap7195 yea, there's not really any point in fighting with them cause it is legit pointless... like it's such a stupid thing to think
Black Israelites or not. This take on king James is FALSE.
@@natasha5822 Books with pictures?!
What the hell is going on in these comments
James VI of Scotland and James I of England
James VI of Scotland (June 19, 1566 - March 27, 1625, reigned July 24, 1567 - March 27, 1625) became James I of England and Ireland (reigned March 24, 1603-March 27, 1625) and was the first king of both England and Scotland. He also held the title of King of France, as had all his predecessors in the English throne since October 21, 1422, although by his time the title didn't come with an active claim of this throne. James succeeded Elizabeth I as the closest living relative of the unmarried childless English monarch, through his descent from one of Henry VIII's sisters.
King James Crowned at the Age of One
Prince James became King of Scotland on July 24, 1567, at the age of 13 months, after his mother Mary, Queen of Scots was forced to abdicate. Mary fled to England, where she was imprisoned for the next 19 years. His father, Lord Darnley, had died in mysterious circumstances shortly after James was born. James was formally crowned at the Church of the Holy Rood, Stirling on July 29, 1567. In accordance to the religious atmosphere of the time, he was brought up as a Scottish Presbyterian, though his mother had been a Roman Catholic.
King James - from Scotland to England
James inherited the throne of England after the death of his mother's cousin, Queen Elizabeth I. James was never a very popular monarch among the people of England. He laid much of the groundwork that would eventually lead to the beheading of his heir Charles I during the English Civil War, but because of his political skills, his rule was relatively stable. James married Anne of Denmark by proxy on August 20, 1589, and in person on November 23, 1589 and again in person in January 21, 1590. They had eight children, of whom only three lived beyond infancy: Henry, Prince of Wales- (February 19, 1594 - November 6, 1612), Elizabeth Stuart - (August 19, 1596 - February 13, 1662), and King Charles I of England, Scotland and Ireland - (November 19, 1600 - January 30, 1649).
James dissolved the English Parliament on February 8, 1622, following a dispute involving parliamentary criticisms of a marriage proposed by James, of his son Charles to Princess Maria Anna of Spain. King James was quoted as saying, "Monarchy is the greatest thing on earth. Kings are rightly called gods since just like God they have power of life and death over all their subjects in all things. They are accountable to God only ... so it is a crime for anyone to argue about what a king can do."
King James is considered to have been one of the most intellectual and learned individuals ever to sit on any English or Scottish throne. He is primarily remembered for authorizing the production of the King James Version of the Bible, the highly popular English translation from Greek and Hebrew, which remains the most printed book in the history of the world, with over one billion copies in print. King James had nothing to do with the translating the Bible, he merely authorized it and provided financing for its production. Beyond that, however, James wrote several books himself.
I am with you !!! Thanks so much I studied England and french history!!!! So proud to see someone who knows what he is talking about. I know all your wrote is the truth. To understand all this this people need a history book to read at least 3 years. It took me two years I started all the way from 13th century up to the revolution time. I know the touching history of Mary queen of Scot. That is her son king of England and Scot.!!!!!!
Thanks
King James's "Counterblast to Tobacco" had to be one of the first anti-smoking campaigns! Well done Your Royal Majesty! :)
As a historian if James I was gay I want to know that he was gay, not suppress the truth. But from the little research I've done on that part (not of real extreme importance to me) I don't find the "evidence" to be very convincing at all. The man might have been a little overly sensitive in the way he wrote and addressed his male companions but I find that hardly grounds to label him gay. In fact I don't find many of his "questionable" actions to be that uncommon in his day and age.
would you say he had good moral character he sounds narcissistic
"His whole approach was based on rational thought - not an English habit" some savage burns in this 😄😄😄
Yes he is burning in Hell together with all those that have placed their salvation on his Bible!
@@bobburns7277
You’re a special kind of crazy.
Online lesson gang where you at 👀
Firstly, everyone here saying words like "gay" and "homo" would be strictly incorrect... There's a difference between gay and bisexual that you clearly don't get... Secondly, nowhere in this doco does it mention that James I's parents were half-cousins! James I's parents were Henry Stuart (Lord Darnley) and Mary Queen of Scots. Henry's mother and Mary's father were half-siblings, children of Margaret Tudor (the elder sister of Henry VIII).
King James realized smoking was bad and unhealthy some 350 years before it was scientifically proven. The man was a genius.
You cough when you smoke. Coughing worsens and can cause you to fall ill which means he’s suffered it and came to the conclusion. I call it common sense.
@@ahmedsheikh2977 lamoooo
@@ahmedsheikh2977 See you say this, but then why did 99% of the rest of the world at the time struggle to come to this "obviously simple" conclusion? Surely if it were so blatant it wouldn't have taken society so many generations & deaths to have realised that smoking is deadly...
What the fuck is up with these comments?
"Openly bisexual" isn't accurate at all. He may have flaunted his love for men, but his (probable) sexual interest in men wasn't confessed or publicly displayed.
He was gay asf shut up
The only gay homosexuals are the white guys who tried to cover up and say he was white.
@@iammathis5806 yo pants are gay af confused child.
This "man", gave us all a gift, a priceless gift. The King James Bible is the Armor of God. The language is precise and unchanging, does not take the lords name in vain(means changing the meanings of the word). It is in every Court Room in the Commonwealth. Ecclesiasites 8/4:Where the word of a king is, there is power:and who may say unto him. What doest thou.The King of Kings, THERE IS NO HIGHER POWER ON EARTH. Your belief is not required for this to be true. Thank you Marcus.
I can almost see the the drool running down your chin, just thinking about, yes i can.
You know fuck all, about fuck all. If your a wise man, you would take it as a compliment. lol, but your NOT.
King James 'gave us all' nothing... he had nothing to do with the translation of the bible into English... (yet one more in a long line of English bibles).. he simply oversaw yet ONE more translation into English... to shut the miserable puritans up more than anything... puritans he loathed by the way... it was translated into English for English speakers in his realm of England... not Scotland nor Ireland nor Wales...who were all overwhelmingly gaelic speakers...not the French, nor the Italians, the Spanish or the Germans, nor the Norwegians or any other race or natonality.. England at the time was but a bit player on the world stage... with a population of about two million ... overshadowed by the (then) mightier kingdoms of France and Spain.. and religious intolerance post reformation was NOTORIOUS throughout the continent.. not only between Catholic and Protestant but also between the various protestant sects that has sprung up all over the place... James like every other European monarch called the shots as to what religion their subjects followed... and in England's case the ONLY accepted form of religion allowed was the CHURCH OF ENGLAND...Anabaptists... the forerunners of todays Baptists were particularly loathed.. in fact James persecuted them so fiercely that they were obliged to escape England (the so called 'pilgrim fathers;) along with other puritanical sects and make for the new world..
thing are held up by their foundation the king James bible inspired by god Jesus teaching are great but man changed the bible to control you free your mind and your ass will follow
One of many bad translations of copys of iron age crap the ONLY thing you care about is its in english and you probably think Jesus spoke English
They realize that King James is pretty recent history. 1650 wasn't that long ago. If King James was black why do all of his children look like fucking Howdy Doodie.
Dear Mr Mosher,
So what you're saying is that there were never any black people in Royalty, and the royals never married out of royalty??
Jonathan Mosher there is no IF King James was black. He was 100% white. What some selfhating black Americans who wished they were white claim is irrelevant.
@@wisedragon173 He was 100% jew. Whok ruled seven countries
@Reece B, keep hating, as that seems to be your speciality!
Mary Strand: Unfortunately for your delusions.... the genealogy of royalty is there for all to see and study.... they intermarried over and over and over again throughout the centuries and are very inbred....and nope... there has NEVER been any mention of any 'black' person intermarrying into European royalty throughout the centuries... and definitely NEVER a single solitary mention of any 'negroid black african' EVER in any royal annals or genealogical trees and records …even DNA studies of royal skeletal remains and those of their countless millions of descendants alive today (which includes nearly ALL current Europeans …. myself included over and over and over again) has shown NO African DNA or even TRACES of any such DNA...so sorry love.... you are not related to us....your ancestry lies firmly, squarely and entirely in sub Saharan Africa....
Freaking lies, how can you put this misinformation on here.
the gun powdwer plot was scarce mentioned in his time and he wasn't gay.
allen Scnmitz: nope...Jamie boy batted for both sides ...
It didn't say he was gay, it said he was bisexual.
What nonsense is going on in this commentsection? 😂
Angry religious folks I guess...?
@@Dominiqueuqinimod angry what makes you think that
Don’t mind me lads. That’s my kid, he is white just like me
Damn.. reading all the comments... very scary.. why so much hate? Too much division among the people.. sad really.. May God bless you all! Peace!
Uh-huh!
anyone else doing this for school isolation work?
Me 😒
Yes 😩
sadly me
yup
@@RainbowGirl8910 sOmEtHinG AbouT YoUr nAmE iS FaMiLiAr
Who here likes baked beans?
Ew who does?
I once farted in a jar, and saved it ...
😂😂
Nimrod was the black king. But people like to ignore that.
It's really scary how people can completely ignore reality and truth they don't like these days. I honestly struggle to understand how their minds work; how can you completely ignore facts and images that are front of you, how can you dismiss them out of hand with no thought what-so-ever, how can you be so completely deluded that you cannot tell the difference between reality and your own wishes?
King James was NOT black. He simply wasn't. There is nothing to dispute, no grand cover up. You simply listened to someone who is either a troll or deluded themselves into believing their own lies. You were tricked, the images that show King James as black ARE NOT images of King James. They are portraits of black people that someone mislabeled to spread a lie. You were lied to when you were told he was black, it is not true. I can't believe I actually have to say that, but apparently I do.
There is a reason this is all happening now, and so suddenly, because it is a fucking hoax. But instead of realizing this, you people double down on the lie, you refuse to accept the reality that you are wrong when ALL OF THE VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE shows that you are. You believe in the lie until your last breath instead of accepting the truth. And worse yet, you perpetuate it, you spread it around to others. You figure that if you dupe enough people, that if you yell loud enough, people will believe that you are right. And somehow it fucking works, because some people are ignorant enough and stupid enough to buy it, and those same people are insecure enough to deny the truth once they have latched on to an idea, because they cannot handle being wrong. It is insane.
You people are fucking scary. Seriously. You do not live in the real world, you live in a deluded fantasy and you get angry when anyone tries to snap you out of it. Which would be tolerable if you didn't insist on trying to spread your insanity to others. Others who don't know any better. That is not good at all, because people like that cannot be reasoned with, they cannot be saved and they cannot be helped.
God help the human race, we are going backwards. I don't understand how, but we are. And you insane fuckers are part of the cause. We are in for some sad times unless our education systems start getting better.
I'm not a racist person. Skin color isn't the problem here, even though it is a particular race that is causing the most damage. The real problem is ignorance and insecurity. Uneducated people believing the first thing they hear because it makes them feel better, it makes them feel special. They then fight for that feeling because they are too insecure to handle being wrong about it, and the underlying anger against white people makes it easy for them to delude themselves into believing their own fantasy.
Like I said before, this is scary shit. And it will not end well for the uneducated liars if they don't start accepting reality. It makes me sad, because none of it has to be this way. If people would only be just a little bit reasonable... **sigh**
@@silvussol8966 truth hurts, I know 🥺😢😩😫
This is Europeon history not African history
Stolen history
Contemporary References to King James I in Shakespeare's Macbeth (1605-06)
One can connect Shakespeare's patron, King James I, to almost every significant dramatic alteration Shakespeare made to his source material on the historical Macbeth, as we can see in Shakespeare's Sources for Macbeth. But fascinating contemporary references and compliments to James also are found throughout the play.
The two-fold balls and treble sceptres (4.1) is a reference to the double coronation of James, at Scone and Westminster, and the most overt homage to James in the play. The balls or globes "were the royal insignia which King James bore in right of his double kingship of England and Scotland, and the three sceptres were those of his three kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland" (Lilian Winstanley, Macbeth, King Lear and Contemporary History).
Another obvious tribute to James is Malcolm's reference to the evil (4.3) or scrofula, which James believed he could cure by his touch; a power supposedly inherited from Edward the Confessor.
A probable allusion to the Gunpowder Plot to assassinate James can be found in Lady Macbeth's words, look like the innocent flower, but be the serpent under't (1.5) and even more riveting is an allusion to a Jesuit priest named Father Henry Garnet, who had concealed his knowledge of the conspiracy:
Faith, here’s an equivocator, that could swear in both the scales against either scale; who committed treason enough for God’s sake, yet could not equivocate to heaven. O, come in, equivocator. (2.3)
Macbeth also, more so than any of Shakespeare's works, is overflowing with Biblical imagery, and, of course, one of King James's great passions was Scripture, culminating in the King James Version of the Bible in 1611. Another of James's interests was witchcraft, and woven into Macbeth are portions of James's own book on the subject, Daemonologie.
It is not surprising that Shakespeare aimed to please James. Shortly after his arrival in London, James insisted that Shakespeare's troupe come under his own patronage, giving them unlimited opportunities and making Shakespeare a wealthy man. More on the King's Men...
Okay, I have to speak on this...
Queen Elizabeth II is a direct descendant of Mary, Queen of Scots.
Mary, Queen of Scots ruled Scotland from 1542 to 1567. Her son, James VI and I, was both King of Scotland and King of England and Ireland, and was the first ruler of the House of Stuart. His daughter was Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia. Elizabeth Stuart's daughter was Sophia of Hanover, who was the mother of George I of Great Britain, who was the first ruler of the House of Hanover. His son was George II of Great Britain, whose son was Frederick, Prince of Wales. Frederick's son was George III, who was king during the American Revolution. He had a son named Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn. His daughter was Queen Victoria, who was the mother of Edward VII, who was the first ruler of the House of Windsor. Edward was George V's father, who was the king during World War I. His song was George VI, who was the king during World War II. And his daughter was Queen Elizabeth II.
So, even though there have been three different houses who ruled England since the time of Mary, Queen of Scots, (the Stuarts, the Hanovers, and now the Windsors), Elizabeth II is a great-granddaughter 11 times over of Mary, Queen of Scots.
So the question is....
When did Queen Elizabeth II became black?
@@fromthefather8349 that was your comments...
We all know that you hate Africans....
@@fromthefather8349 you even stated numerous times that you hated Africans...
@@fromthefather8349 this is what you said i.e I quote:
From the father . 1 day ago
@ogbabyace I know you eat doodoo and drink piss. Africans do that you know?--- From the father
@@ogbabyace I told you that the first humans of the planet were black, you said it was idiotic. You aint shit like leperous skin freak white race you kmow nothing about.
@@ogbabyace I'm a black supremist bitch.
why is most of the video blurry even at high resolution....
Probably low input resolution and high output resolution
If James was openly Gay,then WHY would anyone TRUST his Authorization of the Bible? Doesn't the Bible speak that
Lying with your own Sex is an Abomination?🤔😯😮
Ernest Dabster, James was king... nobody calls kings to task lol.... besides the nobles were too busy vying for his attention by parading the handsome young men of their individual houses before him in a desperate bid to gain ascendancy over him... its called ambition,,,
King James born 1566= 666
Jesus was openly gay.
@@brianwalker4474 You are an idiot ,Openly!
Bible rules are for poor people not kings
King James...The Queen of England, who also was a bit _too friendly_ with animals
This is the man who made his own version of the bible, the one you currently use.
Think about that
Nothing of his own beliefs were added. It's just an English translation under his approval. He was the king after all. He's only credited for it. He didn't write it.
@@SpitFactsAndThenDontReply he definitely rewrote certain things to fit the Romain agenda the etheotpian bible the oldest one and it’s different and fits the agenda of etheopians.... all books have a certain agenda with different versions
King James first book was called Daemonologie .,, Shakespeare took inspiration with the three sisters in Macbeth , the book has werewolves & vampires.
Thank you guys this is a lot of help 🙏
Why?
The most illustrious
and most excellent...
''Prince James of England, Scotland, France,
and Ireland,
By the Grace of GOD
King
He was swart (adj.)
Old English sweart "black, dark," of night, clouds, also figurative, "wicked, infamous," from Proto-Germanic *swarta- (source also of Old Frisian, Old Saxon, and Middle Dutch swart, Dutch zwart, Old Norse svartr, German schwarz, Gothic swarts "dark-colored, black"), from PIE root *swordo- "dirty, dark, black" (source of sordid). The true Germanic word, surviving in the Continental languages but displaced in English by black. Of skin color of persons from late 14c. Related: Swartest.
This is some good homework 📚 right here💯🔥
Possibly the most influential monarch in world history.
Alan Mac: No... James was neither a popular ruler over here in the UK nor an 'influential one'... he is and remains overshadowed in British history by his great predecessor and cousin Elizabeth I and her father in turn King Henry VIII...
Whaaaa where did ya get that bag of crap from !
One of the great ironies of history is that Elizabeth I's successor was the son of the woman she had executed some years before. "What goes around comes around". .... But it is still good to be KING, regardless...
I don’t think she cared who would rule after her. This she didn’t name who she wanted. I think she new it would be James and she was ok with that. Mary would have been a horrible leader. Thus there wouldn’t have been a golden age .
sorry but at 1:24 it was claimed that Britain was united in a single Kingdom, WRONG while it may have had a single monarch the two kingdoms remained separate until the act of union under James; Grandaughter Anne in 1707.
That's not him
WE ALL KNOW THAT...BUT...OUR PEOPLE KNOW THE TRUTH.AND THAT'S WHAT COUNTS ! I HEARD THEY WANT TO MAKE DENZIL WASHINGTON WHITE NEXT YEAR ?!?!
I don't which king James you're talking about but the first king of England who also ruled Scotland and north Ireland was a black man named king James. Shocking isn't it. He is also the King James that had the Bible translated into English around 1603.
so many James 😤
Hahaha haha you really believe your own heresy. King James was White. Get your own history
@@danielm3326 For one it's not hear say. Two, there were white King James but the one who translated the Bible. Three this is my history and I am white and from your childish comment you don't know much about your own history.
@@jerritrahan9149 Not your history ham, stop lying. He was white
@@danielm3326 Sweetie grow up. Yes, like I said, there were white ones. But the first and the one who translated the bible into English was black. Sorry honey, I'm 1/4 Scottish, Irish, French and German so it is my history. I still have relatives Scotland and Germany. So from what I gather from your comments you're a little American girl who is hooked on being white and not happy with her life. Look around you, the world is made of more colors than white.
Everything is messed up it was messed up back then and it's messed up now
I came from my online lesson
I came from online lesson lol
Lol me too
Lmao same
Same social subjects
Wow amazing.....not
King James was black. There’s a picture of him in the original KJV 1611 nice try esau.
Esau's lies!
Walter Turner. Keep up the facts.
Why is the video blurry?
If King James is black then Malcolm X must be white!
His mother was white.
@@fromthefather8349 lol I know but if you read the comments people are trying to say king James is black. That's why I wrote that. Yes he is white
Mary Wagner they are saying he is black not trying to.
@@fromthefather8349 King James is white not Black. Stop with this bullshit camp talk. His whole generation of family is white. Nice try but he is a EUROPEAN who funded the slave trade with his brother and made tons if profit from it.
@@fromthefather8349 Proof please and I'll wait.
1:12 not true. England and Scotland remained separate kingdoms (with the same sovereign) until 1707.
when you're 2 sec. away from being able to put mid roll ads
how was he bisexual when he was married to Queen Anne and had 8 kids? queen Elizabeth is a woman of God as much as James was
Bisexual people are into both genders. Hence "bi" meaning "two".
fooledbyasmile I suggest you pick up the book king James and the reunion of Christendom. The real story of a black man that ruled Scotland and other parts of Europe.
@@judahmourneth3211 I suggest you read books that are peer-reviewed and written by legitimate historians. James Stuart (James I of England and VI of Scotland) was of Scottish birth, his parents were most of British origin, with some French and Spanish ancestry. All documentation of James I & VI, all accounts, and all we know of his background points to a Bisexual White Guy. Anything else is fabricated bullshit.
fooledbyasmile after Rome fell the nobility’s of Europe were black people. The Franks, the lombards, the celts all black people. The anglo-Saxons...that’s why you look up the word ENGLAND it means “land of the angles” (black people) Europe (Europe) was the daughter of a Phoenician Kings. The Phoenicians were Africans.
fooledbyasmile the serfs, peasants or “villiens” worked the land for the Black nobility’s...(Caucasian)
...That’s where you get the term “landlord” because they were lords over the lands and lords over “white people”
The European and English Royals were absolutely crazy!!
@RichardElden apart from "try" to ban Tobacco, what did he really do, that classifies him a hero, hi status as a monarch does not grant him this.
His Mother, Queen of Scots a Scottish woman by blood, French raised was white. His father lord Darnley, an English aristocrat was white, how tf is he black? Lol cmon
Scottish aristocrat not English!!
Look up black Nobility
This was before the Renaissance
Cat 77: Lord Darley was actually born and raised in England as was his mother Lady Margaret Douglas....
Kashar Selema ban Yahawadah No this was during the Renaissance
4:02 "James wasn't good at being popular."
Most savage take on youtube.
i heard that he was freemason
and that made me feel so bad
05:17 "hamrful to the brain"??? Did they have knowledge of the brain and lungs, enough to know what (and what way) a deed was harmful? such as smoking? but how? this was during the time of medical "bleeding-out" was it not? They had no knowledge as to the harm "bleeding" someone had on the body, let alone the brain. just asking....
Although their medicine was rudimentary, people back then understood a lot more about how the body works than we think today. Nicotine causes a tingling sensation in the brain and people coughing because they smoked would have been as common then as now, thus they already knew that it was bad for the lungs. While it is true that they did not know for certain that the heart pumps blood around the body, they suspected that this was the case and it was proved scientifically by William Harvey, who was actually one of James' personal physicians and who published his findings only three years after the King's death.
A Tudor heritage from his mom's bloodline that gave him the throne
Lies. Poor research and outright slander of King James I
What's with all the blur in these docs?
He didn’t look like that
Yes he did
He wasn't black, you god damn halfwit
LIER.LIES, LIES
truth, truth, truth...though what slave owning, slave trading King James's sexuality has to do with you is anyone's guess lol...
Let’s hear it for the horses. By far the best actors in this video.
This is not king James !!!!
well, it is
@@kanglongshankz3313 no it’s not king James was a black man
@@moneytalkj This is the king of England and Scotland you moron, not the king of Mozambique.
@@moneytalkj LOL
@@kanglongshankz3313 Black people were in Europe too you twit. Lmfao.
Discusting lies
They at it again this is how you control the masses
If they lie about little simple things like this.. You know our history books are a lie
If they did carbon dating of his rectum would you believe?
Kang james say ert is flat.
there are many denominations of Christianity around the world, and in every single one there are gay followers no matter how much hate is preached, also king James was a "king" in his era being a homo wasn't popular considering priest beforehand belittled it in ignorance, with his friends he could have been as open as he wanted, but in the public eye its a different story, i found your comment very idle and dull, perhaps comprehend eras of social understandings and benevolence before criticism.
James I is my 12th great grandparent
Ye right lol so whats the secret then
@@rattyvlogger8138 umm its not really a secret. I was just born and thats pretty much it. It doesnt make me royalty so theres nothing amazing about it expect I have his blood. I found all this out a month ago too
@@stephanielapco1 if ur a *heir* tell me your familys secrets like richard III why did he kill the kids when the throne was his ?
@@stephanielapco1 tell me more of your *GRAND* secrets
@@rattyvlogger8138 gee idk rat let me just grab my handy dandy time machine real quick and make my way over so I can ask and then come back and tell you
Lies only fool the unlearned.
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Guys some black dude said king James is black 😂
That confirms it then!
I looked up his portraits from when he was a boy and he has caucasian features. Idk what they're talking about.
Some people just don’t like the simple truth that the blacks of Africa never came up with art or engineering so they don’t have their own history.
Hello Israilite King,James was a, Israilite not so called white man,son name is blacky,dark ages,when people's of color,ruled.
They didn't. King James was white. Blacks were never rulers or kings in Europe. Sorry. That's false history.
diminished comet make sure that you're right for putting this on TH-cam. Remember you will answer for everything you do on this Earth that will lead people in error.
A B Careless really? Lmao
🤣🤣🤣🤣 Crazy people man
People fighting to claim ol cheating,swings both ways,murdering,sugar daddy to his young male lovers ,alcoholic,woman torturing,didn't go to his own son's funeral- King James,cos he did some editing of a book!Religion is one hell of a drug!
This is my direct line, I am a direct decent any of both Lord Darnly as well as James the brother of Mary Queen of Scotts and their father King James. I can see that the Scottish side does go back to that line said to be chosen and does go back to the ancient world, however "Black" is an extreme and inaccurate description! the other side decendened from Lord Darnly (King James's father) and is English who is not Black in any way as far as I can tell.
You may be a relative of mine? I am descended from his Mistress Lady Margaret of Erskine who at the time was married to Lord Dundas of Arniston. However, her last two children where recognised in court as his???
If your line is Scottish learn how to spell Scots!!!
Its unlikely Darnley was the biological Father of James
Tracked my lineage back to him as well.
@Cortez take that! lol
King James caused the troubles in what is now Northern Ireland.
That is NOT King James real photo.
Photo? Hahahahaha Hillarious!
This story is a LIE.
What the true story
"Having been raised in Scotland he was rather baffled by the idea of Common Law," who wrote this rubbish? There is such a thing as Scottish Common Law.
king james of scotland is my forfathers on my dadside
Hes my 12th great grandpa
@John John i found out a month ago. I’m related to mary queen of scots too
Frankly this is awful.
what is?🤔
to whoever said that gay men couldnt marry women- yes, they could. Ever heard of Alan Turing?
any religion that says check my brain at the door i question
King James wasn't white, he was a black man, and 1st King of England, Scotland, and North Island. And he was very popular as a King due to him wanting his subjects to be educated and for translating the Bible into english for everyone to use. He was also the long standing ancestor of Henry the 8th.
@Wyneze4sheeze 02 ..U NEED TO DO YOUR RESEARCH...I BET U THINK IRISH PEOPLE IS ALL PALE PEOPLE IN THAT ERA..IN FACT THEY WAS MELANIN PEOPLE..IN FACT..IF U GO TO IRELAND..U STILL SEE MELANIN PICTURES OF MELANIN PEOPLE ...WE RAN EUROPE IN THAT ERA UNTIL OUR FALL...IT'S ALL IN THE UNVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE ..IN BLACK &WHITE....WHAT U NEED TO UNDERSTAND....THERE WAS ALOT OF "WHITE WASHING " IN THEM DAYS..AND STILL GOING ON IN TODAY'S WORLD...THE ORIGIN OF THE FIRST MAN WILL ALWAYS BE THE FIRST..AND ALWAYS BE THE LAST...STANDING ON THIS PLANET...FACT !!!
Can I text you for helping me in something concerning King James?
Hahaha King James was white from the house of Stuart son of Mary Queen of Scots And Henry Stuart he was the nephew of Henry the VIII he had his portrait painted twice his sons had their portraits painted and they also were involved in the Trans Atlantic slave trade and king James the second his grandson is having his portrait removed from parliament because of his Ties to chattel slavery. And you claim they were black. Stop embarrassing yourself. You have no clue about our history and are clearly jealous.
@Wyneze4sheeze 02 He wasn't a Roman he was from the house of Stuart.
@@reginaldbrownmusic8356 Europe, Britain and Ireland has been white since the early Neolithic period. And the DNA haplogroups prove it. Ireland only has a black population of 1 percent to this day. Britain 3 percent Wales and Scotland 1 percent.
This isn't LeBron
EverythingCounts
LeBron is 100 times better
In 1611 when King James translated the bible, a Leda and the swan statue was erected in Copenhagen,Denmark, the Kalmar War begins in Norway, Kristianopel is besieged by the Swedes, Fort Belgica is built by the Dutch, Machilipatnam is established by the British Empire, The city of Henricus is founded in Virginia by the English, a charterhouse school is established in England, Arras College is established in France, Couvent des Jacobins de la rue Saint-Honore is founded, the French Oratory is founded, Louis xiii is the monarch of France, Ellwangen witch trials begin in Germany, the Perpetual Edict is established in Southern Netherlands, Palatinate-Lutzelstein-Guttenberg is established, Irish parliament is established, the Sejm of 1611 takes place in Warsaw, Tsar Vasily IV of Russia pays tribute to King Sigismund III Vasa of Poland, Oratory of Saint Philip Neri is established in the Papal States, Fort San Lucia is established in Malta, Count of Miranda do Corvo is created, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth besieges Smolensk, Convento de San Norberto, Hermitage of St. Simon, and Iglesias del Buen Suceso is established by Spain, Kingdom of Sweden begins, Swedish conquest of Korela forest, Sweden has an armistice with Poland, Gothenburg is burned by the Danes, the Polish-Swedish War ends in a truce.
Macin J Horstemeyer stop trolling.
I am not trolling, I am telling the facts unlike you.
*random axe comes out of nowhere*
Sombody got beheaded!
King James was indeed a black man as was his Son King Charles and grandson King Charles II. I stumbled across a book written in Memoirs of the Secret Services of John Macky. This book describes King Charles, his sons, and grandsons as Black Men. It also describes the wealthiest Europeans of the time as black. This book is available at University of Pennsylvania and the New York Public Library. Additionally, the UK National Archives has ship manifests of Jacobite prisoners. They were mostly black people. Not only that, the father James I and VI was Lord Henry Darnley, a black man. His portrait is in the National Portrait Gallery and other places. It’s pretty clear nowadays that you all are in denial and don’t know what you’re talking about.
If you’re going to attack black people and attempt to steal our history, you should do more research and debunk these first-hand, primary accounts and portraits. 😊
Lmao you idiots amaze me with your stupidity
I've looked through most of his portraits and engravings. He was a white man. Look up his childhood portraits, he was definitely white.
@@optimvsprinceps1845 Then why was his family described as black? Why was King Charles, his grandson described as black? Why does Lord Darnley look like a black man in his portrait? Why were all the Jacobites noted as black, brown, etc on the ship manifests. It’s likely that King James was a black man of mixed descent as were many of the elites during that time as Moors and aboriginals bred with whites.
I do find it somewhat charming that some black people will ignore every other portrait of a historical figure, but based on one drawing with a shaded style declare to the world "AY LAWD DARNLEY WUZ A NIGGA!"
Thank you very much.Hello from Moscow.
I don't believe it nor does true historical facts proves that he was homosexual.
Wayne, you are wrong. Read up on it ffs.
Wayne d. Unfortunately for you the facts state utterly, completely and entirely that James was bisexual ….
guys, guys... King James was actually an albanian descendant of the ancient illyrian tribes!!
Actually he was a Native American of the Aztec civilisation and fought against the Spanish Conquistadors!
This is incorrect. His parents were white.
you should read it before you make a rash choice of hating something you've only probably heard rumors of.
KING JAMES WAS BLACK.
@Thy word is light that's not what the photo in the original 1611 shows. Your time is up. Israel has awaken. The white washing has come to an end. Don't be mad Jesus was black you nimrod lover 😆
King James was black? Hahahaha.. Where do you get that idea? From Disney Channel? 🤣🤣🤣
@@S.H-J83 KING James the 1st of England was originally King James the 6th of Scotland.
He was the son of a black father and a colored mother both of royal blood. In 1565, Queen Mary was married by her cousin, a black Scottish man of the royal family who was called Darnley.
Darnley was killed in 1567 by the white rivals of the Queen, but he had left Queen Mary a male heir of her own lineage.
Queen Mary’s son was born a few months before his father’s murder and he was named James the 6th.
James the 6th was, therefore, the son of a black man and a colored woman.
@@IAMDC144 ..NOW THEY KNOW WHY THERE EMPIRE IS FALLEN IN FRONT OF THERE EYE...THEY BELIEVE THERE OUR HYPE,LOL BUT..THESE 3 YEARS WILL OPEN UP THERE EYES......AND THEY MIGHT KNEE DOWN TO U...ONCES THEY FOUND OUT WHO IS YOUR "FATHER" !!! LET THEM HAVE THERE LAST FUN ..202+2 IS AROUND THE CORNER !!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@mastercontrol2461 Hahaha King James was white from the house of Stuart son of Mary Queen of Scots And Henry Stuart he was the nephew of Henry the VIII he had his portrait painted twice his sons had there portraits painted and they also were involved in the Trans Atlantic slave trade and king James the second his grandson is having his portrait removed from parliament because of his Ties to chattel slavery. And you claim they were black. Stop embarrassing yourself.
wow....... a homosexual has a version of the bible
Why is that surprising ?
because the scriptures say no homosexuality and no feminine shall inherit the kingdom
@@joecamble4071 this not true. He had one wife and 9 kids.
The Stuart line of monarchs were among the most controversial in their own time. Although their matriarch, Mary Queen of Scots (1542-1567), was beheaded, her son King James I (1566-1625) unified the Scottish and English crowns in 1603. Despite the English Civil War and a twelve-year interregnum, a total of six (6) monarchs were crowned from the paternity of Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley of Scotland (1545-1567). This Y-DNA linage can be traced further back to Robert II of Scotland (1316-1390), Walter FitzAlan (1106-1177) and Alan FitzFlaad (1070-1114) who came from Brittany, France as a knight in Norman service. Because Brittany was settled (and named) by displaced Celts from Britain in the 5th century, this lineage is thought to be anciently Celtic.
Although the Stuart line of British monarchs ended with the death of Queen Anne in 1714, there are several living Dukes and other Peers who are patrilinealy descended from King Charles II (1630-1685).12 Thus, the Stuarts could easily return to the throne if a female Mountbatten heiress were to marry a Stuart male in the future. The recent birth of a male Prince Cambridge, however, makes the possibility of returning a Stuart to the throne unlikely for the 21st century.
Thanks to an energetic DNA project12and the participation of many Stuart / Stewart descendants, the Stuart Y-DNA signature is the best-studied of all the British monarchs. Figures 3 and 5 include test result highlights for the Stuarts based on an identified ducal descendant of King Charles II.20 Their Y-DNA is characterized as part of haplogroup R1b-L21 with the key SNP mutation L745. This R1b-L21 result is consistent with the Celtic attribution of the Stuart’s 11th century patriarch.
MALE LINE DESCENT OF THE HOUSE OF STEWART/STUART R1b-L21 (R1b CELTIC LINE)
SIR ALAN FITZ FLAAD OF BRITTANY
Father of
SIR WALTER FITZALAN
Father of
SIR ALAN FITZWALTER 2nd HIGH STEWARD
Father of
SIR WALTER STEWARD/STEWART 3rd HIGH STEWARD
Father of
SIR ALEXANDER STEWART 4th HIGH STEWARD
Father of
SIR JOHN STEWART OF BONKYLL
Father of
SIR ALAN STEWART OF DREGHORN
Father of
SIR ALEXANDER STEWART OF DARNLEY
Father of
SIR ALEXANDER STEWART OF DARNLEY
Father of
SIR JOHN STEWART OF DARNLEY
Father of
SIR ALAN STEWART OF DARNLEY
Father of
JOHN STEWART 1st EARL OF LENNOX
Father of
MATTHEW STEWART 2nd EARL OF LENNOX
Father of
JOHN STEWART 3rd EARL OF LENNOX
Father of
MATTHEW STEWART 4th EARL OF LENNOX
Father of
HENRY STEWART/STUART LORD DARNLEY
Father of
KING JAMES VI & I
@@kevindanner2090 thanks
eenor71 awesome stuff you posted
@@projectpoetry6891 I wasnt talking to you i was talking to eenor71
So i See you you like lies my bad
@@projectpoetry6891 THERE is NO more 'info' on Ellen More or 'Black Margaret'..... that is it in its entirety... a brief mention in a court report of finances and around this you have manged to weave a WHOLE fantasy.... THAT is what CHILDREN do.... grow up.... with each post you write you are simply making a bigger fool of yourself on the public stage and showing the watching world the intelligence of the average african american,... the MAIN male line Y DNA of Great Britain and Ireland ... indeed the WHOLE of WESTERN EUROPE was and remains R1b... a FACT... an indisputable FACT... NO NEGROID SKULL has EVER been unearthed in ANY ANCIENT GRAVE over here.. a FACT....an indisputable FACT...the mtDNA lineages of Great Britain and Ireland .... indeed the WHOLE OF WESTERN EUROPE was and remains confined to just SEVEN female Lineages... J or K or H or T or U or W or X... FACT... indisputable FACT... the current populations today in Great Britain and Ireland are the flesh and blood DIRECT genetic heirs... both ROYAL and COMMONER of our Anglo Saxon, Celtic, Basque, Viking and French Norman ancestors... a FACT...an indisputable FACT... NO SUB SAHARAN AFRICAN DNA has EVER been found either in ancient skeletal remains OR in the current populations over here in the UK and Ireland...NONE..not a drop...not a single solitary strand.... NOW what YOU have to do is provide YOUR OWN genetic, historical, anthropological, scientific, archaeological PRIMARY original FACTS to disprove ANY of the above INDISPUTABLE FACTS ... THAT is what ADULTS do in the big grown uo world outside your ghetto... and until you can do that you are simply showing the entire planet how stupid YOU personally are and, as a representative of your race how stupid african americans truly are...
I am a African-American and trust me I understand and am well informed In Europe History and King James was not Black.
Why then was his son who succeeded him was referred to as the dark/black Prince.
alphie browne: His son was the chestnut haired blue eyed King Charles I ,,,,,
Clearly...not that well informed
@@eenor71
One:"caucasoid"..."negroid". Simpleton, those corporate terms of designation mean little to nothing to me. I suggest you save that for your conversations with your fellow Göttingen School of History underlings. As, that terminology has nothing to do with the amount of melanin one has in their skin ... but rather the shape of the skull (dolicocephalic vs brachy vs meso) the contours of the jawline (prognathous vs orthognathoius) and the shape of the nose (aquiline vs flat)...among a myriad of other things. however, like ive stated, those terms men nothing in the context of your request....as we DONT HAVE ANY OF KING JAMES' SKELETAL STRUCTURE TO ANALYZE.
Two: Like wise... Ill be waiting for you to show me an Xray Validated, unaltered image of King James that Thomas Cromwell and his filthy minions didnt get their paws on.
www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/11361080/Thomas-Cromwell-was-the-Islamic-State-of-his-day.html
"And then there is his impact on this country’s artistic and intellectual heritage. No one can be sure of the exact figure, but it is estimated that the destruction started and legalised by Cromwell AMOUNTED TO 97% of OF THE ENGLISH ART THEN IN EXISTENCE. Statues were hacked down. Frescoes were smashed to bits. Mosaics were pulverized. Illuminated manuscripts were shredded. Wooden carvings were burned. Precious metalwork was melted down. Shrines were reduced to rubble. This vandalism went way beyond a religious reform. It was a frenzy, obliterating the artistic patrimony of centuries of indigenous craftsmanship with an intensity of hatred for imagery and depicting the divine that has strong and resonant parallels today."
Three: As those of us that are INFORMED are more than aware of the fact that your recessive/mutated genetic (Blond hair, blue eyes) Horite ancestors enjoyed commissioning authentic imagery to be repainted over or outright destroyed once they came into power.
See Example........
Johann I (1468-1532), the Constant, Elector of Saxony (1532-33)
Before X-ray:
qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-c32b75daae5503549d2ea9411f9ce7ed
Post X-Ray
qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-82d7eac04e3473f0e662184dacf26b4d
Clearly an altered work...
oh yeah...and here a COIN of the real King James
qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2dae40a205e12979c35b1267dadb2478
So please....spare me the malarkey and the plethora of google images that make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside when you seek to validate what misinformation you have been inculcated with as concerning the historical King James.
If you want to believe the narrative...thats one thing. But for you to troll the comment section as much as you do, antagonizing people who dont want to accept the narrative...is sottish at best.
Carry on...youve been addressed once, and thats all the attention you'll get from me.
Proverbs 26:4-5 King James Version
4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
@@dcogent1 STILL waiting for YOU to show us the bibles YOUR ancestors in west and central africa were using before being given it (in european languages of course lol)...by your european slave masters... where are the churches, the cathedrals, the illuminated manuscripts. the gospels and books of hours???? Show us the magnificent christian artwork from the earliest centuries a.d..... show us the gothic splendour of YOUR tribal ancestors religious foundations... the perpenicular or Romansque beauty only to be found in europe.... created by european christians for their fellow european christians over the past two thousand years... go on... i dare you lol...
A lie. He was not homosexual.
He was; it doesn't matter to me though since I use the Douay Rheims Bible anyway.
What is your referenced proof that he was not?
There is more out there that says he was gay than not; rictornorton.co.uk/jamesi.htm so what, he was gay??
I think he’s saying the because he would openly kiss the Duke of Buckingham.
he was bisexual. They recently found a secret tunnel between his bedroom and Buckinghams.
He wasn't gay. There was no proof of that.
Love letters between James and Buckingham and description of many people at talking how James kissed, caressed Buckingham in public. Also he said he love Buckingham to parliament
alas for you... the proof that he was gay is overwhelming, indisputable and copious...
Sir John Oglander observed that he "never yet saw any fond husband make so much or so great dalliance over his beautiful spouse as I have seen King James over his favourites, especially the Duke of Buckingham"[135] whom the King would, recalled Sir Edward Peyton, "tumble and kiss as a mistress."[136] Restoration of Apethorpe Palace undertaken in 2004-08 revealed a previously unknown passage linking the bedchambers of James and Villiers
I came here cause I was searching lebron James (King James)
you dont know me 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
If James is black, that means I’m Chinese and I’m 99.8% white
Your not to bright.
@@builder333 Tell that to my skin colour
King James traced his roots back to Ethiopian Hebrews..who ofcourse were black.
@@NGT4LIFE And Where's your proof?
He was black… Google Real King James
We are? Do you have proof?
James was openly bisexual and as the King he wouldn't need to hide this. This was also not so rare among 'royalty'. Back then, the saying was 'women are for making babies and men are for fun'. He had several gay lovers including George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham and Robert Carr, 1st Earl of Somerset. He also had a mistress named Anne Murray. So much for that 'cleave unto your wife' that was included in the Bible that he paid for. As for contemporary history, there is no evidence of him being gay, and plenty of evidence that he was bisexual and also cheated on his wife.
Also note that King James was black. Both of his parents were black with his mother being royalty. But thanks to Euro-white washing, he was painted as a white man. James was also a 'witch hunter', killing people that were accused of being a witch.
Most people that hate this are religious people that believe in the Bible for no good reason other than they were raised to believe it, and without evidence.
..... Source?
So you're saying King James was bisexual and black, OK, what are your sources? Because every painting of him I looked up, he's white.
King James was Black but your kj whos in this video sure was
@@denisemilfort4581 have you ever asked who painted this, when and where? Our do u just accept information from anyone no matter what lol. 9/10 any depiction you see of KING JAMES and most European rulers pre renaissance are white washed versions. Similar to white JESUS they create idolic monuments thru busts or paintings to implant the IDEA that these were so called caucasian.
Kind of dumb to use 300-400 year old paintings to justify your belief of how someone looked.
He was not gay and he was not black. Funny how any description of relationships between men of antiquity are always revised in order to fit the alphabet community's agenda. People need more friends these days.
To all those blacks claiming James was black. He wasn’t he was a white Celt. The only black part of the royal family is George III’s wife Charlotte who had black ancestry.
Stunner 900 ....Nope... yet more african american fantasy... Charlotte was not black, nor remotely black, nor of ANY black ancestry.... she was the blue eyed light brown haired germanic wife of the pro slavery King George III... the king of Britain at the height of Britain's involvement in the slave trade to the americas of black africans...
@@eenor71 nal she was mixed stop spewing bs there are accounts of her being mullato
Who cares ? Argue if he wrote the Bible or not that would be worth debating and it would stay on topic.
Lies
@@Vater1 He DIDN'T write the bible you plank.... the bible was the bible from its inception and amalgamation (old and new testaments under one cover) in the first centuries A.D.... and was the cornerstone of European law, religion and culture from that time onwards....King James simply OVERSAW its translation into English for HIS English speaking subjects and no one else.... he didn't translate it himself or have any part in its translation... nor was this the FIRST translation into English... the Tyndale, the Bishop's bible and the Geneva bible were already in print and had been for over a century ... nor indeed is his overseen English version bible actually CALLED the 'King James bible'... it is actually called the AUTHORISED VERSION... and what do we mean by 'authorised'??? it means AUTHORISED by the Anglican Church (The Church of England)... the Church James was supreme Head of, a title EVERY successive British ruler maintains to this very day... our current Queen Elizabeth II is the head of the church at present...
What is with the comment section.
The overly emotional narrative misses the meaning. Horrible.