@@514BMXJay I'm still not finished listening to the whole 162-minute-long video. I've listened to bits while working, taking a shower, walking the dogs, and eating. Also, I pause the video to sometimes comment. Otoh, I've never listened to youtube videos while I'm falling asleep or sleeping. I like a fan blowing in my room and no other noises.
..... Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus
...... Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Romans 6.23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus
Agreed my friend I love this and with the integrity it can dish out and recognize is intriguing I can view this compared to my world this would be my example of a non existent circle.
The fact this got recommended to me without me literally even having notifications on is mad anyways another iceberg video Keep up the good work brother
Ive watched your vids since near the beginning and you legitimately have made a lot of progress not just in your tech quality/script/editing but your presentational skills have improved dramatically. Good job! 👍
31:10 mereology (wow wasnt even in my spellcheck vocabulary) reminds me of the thought process of how examing atoms on a molecular level resembles vast similarities with observing planets and galaxies on a cosmeic level. Theres another term for the perpetual scaling in size that alludes me. 30 mins in for this to be my first video of yours and you earned my sub. My only suggestion would be time stamps really benefits a video like this. Adding in my thoughts on optimistic determinism and how it correlates with nature and nurture. The thought experiment of if the entire human race became deterministic would reflect heavily on a precedent for education through nature and nurture. Overall Great work and well put together!
Hi phisosipher here. First off, love the video, glad to see you're making such a long video on something that can be very niche. As well as just diving right into it. I'm still on the first layer, but you have had a few mistakes. For example the tripartite soul isn't necessarily about knowledge per say, but about that nature of humanity. What you explained JTB tripartite which is attributed to Plato. But in Thesseus he's seen arguing against it. Buy knowing what Plato believed is quite hard same with what he actually thought up given the nature of his work. You've also mispronounced a few things too. :3 but all in all I'm glad to see this!
A friendly and respectful suggestion if you don't mind, before you do another video about philosophy, look up the pronunciations of the names of the philosophers, and the schools of thought.
Great overview of philosophy's critical branches! Emphasizing epistemology and metaphysics not only deepens our understanding of the world but also enhances our decision-making processes, which is crucial for personal and professional growth. 🌟
37:45 My understanding of essentialism is imagine a chair, there are many different kind of chairs, expensive ones, made of gold, or cheap ones made of wood, or even just a wood stump. but they are all "chair" and are univercially reconised chair, there for there must be a "ideal, perfect chair that is the most chair of all chair" out there, the esscences of a chair, what makes a chair chair if you will. This also apply to eveything, like the "ideal idea of a circle" or "ideal idea of language" so on and so forth.
Absolutely love this breakdown! I've been digesting philosophy part by part for years and this is an excellent overview. Be sure to follow up any questions with further research on the topic. This should be a springboard into more specific field research. Those struggling to understand art should explore aesthetic philosophy. If you have a religious belief you hold strongly maybe start looking through theology as a whole to have some context for what you believe compared to others. Lots of other examples are implied but basically keep growing!!
A deep dive of philosophy like this begs the question of if it is all pointless, if we are “thinking too deep about nothing” (spoiler alert philosophy is needed). Many will brush off philosophical questions as unapplicable to real life, a purely meaningless theoretical that only distracts from reality. Their main evidence being that you can imagine what does not exist. When you do imagine, question, etc without checking the real world, eventually (or instantly) you will become entirely divorced from reality and so become meaningless. But on the other side of the coin, knowledge by itself is meaningless. Let’s say a person only knows that a cup filled with water is easy to drink from. Sure they can use this knowledge to drink from the cup and be satisfied for life. But with simple questioning they could imagine a bigger cup and create that or a lid for the cup to keep the water for later, etc. Knowledge is only good for the exact moment it is needed. Even if you have two puzzle pieces of knowledge, missing the connecting piece, it is impossible to find this clear hole without some level of questioning and thought. (The old urban legend of NASA spending billions of dollars to make a pen work in space while USSR just used pencils, you can have all the knowledge you need to solve this problem but miss the solution without thought). All of reason is based on philsophy, and is impossible to exist without. Reason needs to be justified through thought, questioning, and debate. So take this as a love letter to your video and to philosophy itself, as it is the most important part of who we are, and it is not some form of “thinking too deep” it is truth
Mr goofer, u used metapgysics logic, which IS meaningless. We use 'meaningless knowledge' to interact with ppl, its existing because we exist(society), if we close eyes on why it exists it automatically seems 'meaningless', while in truth ur talk is meaningless. hehehhaw
Also, go check 1st question(and its 3 levels) of philosophy and lectures, its better than goofy icebergs or things made to satisfy our wantings(popular philosophy)
..... Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Romans 6.23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus
Bro remaking a video to correct pronunciation and grammatical errors and then still mispronouncing and using wrong words is so on brand for this type of TH-camr
Lmfao. I just watched your 25-minute-long philosophy tier list yesterday, and my last comment basically boiled down to, "Bro, this could a much longer video with a much better rubrick of some kind, and maybe the rubrick could be made by seeing how philosophy is broken into fields." Then you released this nearly 3-hour-long beast. 😅 It's eerily as if you heard my comment and were like, "Okay, let's release the BIG ONE." I haven't watched all the way through yet (released to public only 44 minutes ago), but I'm sure it's way more in-depth than the tier list, and I'm guessing the video will probably cover the idea (another thing I commented about on the tier list video) that these philosophies are complexly overlapping. Many of these philosophies overlap or lead back and forth to one another. I see modern or contemporary philosophies as one large system of thought, or one big interlinked conversation about what the hell is happening in this universe. Thanks.
@@davidmarlowe9393 lol wtf wrongs with this one now haha its crazy, people literally tell you their biggest fears when they try to insult you. i take it you didnt do well trying to make those irl friends lol.
I tried to fall asleep to this, but every time you say beings it sounds like beans. I'm giggling too much at these philosophical theories on legumes for this to work
Ignoring the entire content of a 3 hour video to correct 1 word you can clearly understand what it was supposed to be. Even said jokingly with love being a grammar nazi is just kinda lame and really undercuts everything said
@@nerdcorner2680he is calling the entire video scripted. What is really sad is the author being AI GENERATED SHIT. he cant pronounce half his words right. youd think youd have use a word first before using it in a ‘script’
19:00 maybe it's my bias, but I think it would be interesting, cool, or perhaps wise to add Peter Singer's expansion of moral consideration to all sentient beings. I'm not vegan or vegetarian, and there are no AI or robotic sentient beings yet, but I think it's a good plan to include all sentient beings in our moral considerations. It's also shows how ethics continues to develop.
@@malamstafakhoshnaw6992 Simply put, there seems to be no right or wrong in music. Music can be almost anything. It helps if the music follows convention & norms so listeners can recognize that it's music, but music can be very diverse.
Essentialism basically states that there are core characteristics which are necessary for a person or thing to be that person or thing. A table can be made of many different materials, and come in different sizes and colors, but there are specific criteria that it retains to remain a table. The best analogy I can think of is a species holotype in biology, it's a representative of the characteristics that separate it from all other species. I hope that helps.
yeah im 10 minutes in and this is just unbearable and sad. he needs to rewrite his script too bc it sounds like he made a ton of spelling errors, and if he didn't, he should just use an AI voiceover at this point because this is somehow worse. seriously got me wondering if he's dyslexic or has never seen a dictionary. anyways, i'm sparing my ears from this garbage, leaving a dislike, and finding something better.
11:45 haha, yeah, some of it is pretty wild, but I think you and I can agree that "modern art" isn't a monolith. There are so many different kinds of "modern art" that it's hard for me to say one, general thing about all of it. One particular example (I think we can agree is included in "modern art") is Afremov's oil paintings. I guess he counts a bit toward impressionism (he doesn't fall neatly in that category, but it's close), and I find a lot of impressionism very nice. The abstract impressionism gets kind of hard for me to enjoy, but so long as I can reocognize what's occurring in the artwork, then I'm farily satisfied. Also, I think it's important to repcgnize how "modern art" is at least three major categories (late 19th century to about 1970s (Afremov might even be counted as "contemporary" due being newer than "modern art")): cubism (which I find kind of odd, but interesting), expressionism (some of this is very cool or interesting art but can be a bit abstract for me), impressionism (probably my favorite one of these three so long as it's not too abstract). There are other groups going on (absurdism, surrealism, dada, fauvism, futurism...). I guess you might find all of them odd or uninteresting. That's okay, I guess. 😅 All of that said, if you enjoy forms of classical or neo-classical art, then I get it. They're very well made and can be very beautiful and deeply meaningful. I think another part of how come art got so wild is that folks saw enough classical and neo-classical art, and they simply wanted something new. It had to test or break old boundaries. It had to show complex, chaotic life in a nonstructuralist manner. It had to be "new" art. Who knows if this is overall a good development? A patron can pay artists to create any genre they like to have made these days: just find an artist you like that does commission work and pay for it to get done. It may or may not turn out exactly how you want it. 😅 That's usually a rich person kind of activity depending on how popular the artist is.. ==== A few days later, at 30:15, I noticed you have an Afremov painting in your video. Do you like or not like Afremov? Is he not modern or even contemporary? When you say you don't like modern art, are there exceptions to this statement? 😅
what a great video! how many hours did you invest in this? also dont listen to the people complaining, its still very informative. yes there are some mispronounciations, but one can learn very much about philosophy from this video
So atomic time is defined by the cycles of radiation around a cesium 133 atom, in which one “second” equals 9,192,631,770 cycles, right? Now there’s the theory of observation in quantum mechanics that states, “by the very act of watching, the observer affects the observed reality.” Stick with me- so time in itself can be observed and affected just by observing it. Basically a gritty, detailed version of why when we are focused on time and how slowly it’s moving, we are actively slowing time in our perception of reality.
Mology, sounds like the idea that all things are made of other things, with current science we understand that the smallest we can examine currently are phantom particles and quarks, even smaller somehow those are also made of "things". Currently the theory is that matter is made of energy (vibration/movement/heat/light etc...) that has transferred or lost enough momentum to be observed as "matter" or a thing that can be physically interacted with. Currently that is the dead end on the side of smaller pieces, although it is theorized that due to any measurable amount of space actually has an infinite amount of space, may mean that there could possibly be more smaller parts of what we can interact with that we currently have no technology that could verify this, as a tool to measure such small things requires nearly just as small things hitting them AND bouncing back to a sensor and enlarging the after image. Regardless it's simply theory. Similarly just as difficult to imagine or study, is the big side of things. As your tissues are made of cells, your body is made of tissues. The idea is that even if we don't know we are part of a larger organism or substance, it does not disprove the theory. This theory also hypotheses that things are part of INFINITELY larger things, and so on and so forth. Essentially, Mology is the idea that all things are separate yet connected in ways we simply have no way to observe, allmost as if its a 3D infinitely large fractal of infinitely different materials, made of infinitely smaller and unique materials. The value of this can be many things if not anything. We currently understand that different "unnatural" materials may be synthesized with natural materials put into specific shapes and builds of the smaller pieces, meaning that if we could effectively see, and move smaller and smaller materials, then we can effectively convert or even synthesize anything we want in the material and energetic spectrum. The idea additionally delves into the idea that the fabric of space itself is a legitimate material we can not sense, and the building blocks of the material or even the material itself could potentially reshape or change energy density and become matter itself. If such things are possible, my own theory is that space is a highly energetic ocean of unimaginably small "things" and so if some of these things slow down enough, flow would be disrupted, causing a massive shift in materials and eneries from the point of change and causing a chain effect out in a 3d bubble shaped wave in all directions. This idea would explain the concept of how and why eventually space may implode on itself. Matter would be made by the bumbing into of space into space, eventually this bumping slows down to a halt, and at that point, whatever the base version of space is would start to seep back into what we know as our space, and rebalance the energy causing the materials to return to its original state. This would also explain the idea of infinite big bangs, as space would be an infinite area full of this material/fabric, and energy must move somewhere, and with infinite space, energy would never stop moving entirely, at least not all at once. Anyway, philosophy itself is a wonder example of this as well, there and many of them and they are all unique in their own way, yet they are all a part of a larger truth or idea that could be infinitely complex.
Dude, once in this you said "Sorry if this is boring to some of you", two hours in. The ones still with you probably wouldn't last an hour if they thought this kinda stuff was boring ^^
nice, although it is complicated to do low levels of a philosophical iceberg without reaching Deleuze and Guattari, CCRU and maybe the more schizo and perhaps mystical areas of philosophy
I like long videos. Personally I want more of them. Some parts of this seemed a bit rushed. Like you where in a hurry getting through. Not needed. I had to leave about two hours in, but when I got back I just skipped back 20 seconds and continued from there. When I saw the length of your video I thought "That's it. That's what I'm after". But more important if I'd click your video is that you do what you enjoy, mkay?
This would be the ultimate philosophy iceberg if you will revise it and incorporate philosophy of science and its all recent sub-fields: philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of complexity and chaos, philosophy of information, philosophy of psychology, philosophy of earth science, philosophy of physics, philosophy of biology, philosophy of logic, philosophy of chemistry and pharmacology, philosophy of ecology, philosophy of cognitive science, philosophy of medicine, philosophy of engineering science, philosophy of economics, philosophy of linguistics and philosophy of anthropology and sociology. (source: Handbook of the Philosophy of Science by Elsevier) And also summarize how the line of thought of western philosophy to idealism- new realism in the middle and late 19th century by the analytic but the continental took idealism more seriously even in the light of the success of modern science.
Very interesting 😀. It would be great if you could complete the chaptering, so that we can easily access all the philosophies (including the ones after the anti-natalist 😅. Thanks). Great video otherwise 🙂
Nonono 1:54:16 "Very similar to absurdity" sounds about right. 👍 Sorry, I wasn't listening too much - I like wisdom to razzle through my mind, like wind in a tree's crown ^^ I think that the 'ultimate truth' is All = All. But in order to make any sense of 'all' you have to define it, and here is where the lack of our observation and understanding puts forks in the road. (I'm done here. the rest of text is just confusing examples of how to define "anything") For a fork in the road (beyond the 'shadow reality' of "even ideas exist somewhere") to be truth, we must define the fork and the road as different entities, which means we have to define some atoms as 'fork' and some atoms as 'road', therefore we have to define what an atom is; electrons etc; and what electrons are, quarks (or what ever, strings, you get it). Also we have to disprove that there isn't an infinite chain of those building blocks containing building blocks containing building blocks etc. (I am once again done, but I'll continue anyway, because f logic) After we define 'these' atoms are fork and 'those' atoms are road, we have to exclude their exchange of matter, meaning that the electrons 'n energy interchanged is in a changing state. Easily to do this we could make an idea of an area; "What this fork form contains is 'fork'". Having done this we can throw 'defining what matter is fork' out the window, since now we have a 'fork form' which we could place anywhere around any matter; "This fork is made of wood in the tree that grew through the road", "This fork is made out of air because the form is there and you can't stop me". Here we have combined "Beyond the 'shadow reality of ideas existing somewhere'" with the physical world (which we have yet to define down to its source of existence). So between guessing on what we have and imagining what we have, there we have a fork in the road of trying to figure out anything at all, beyond 'All=All'. I find that often humans can't define the parts of the question, so the answer can't answer definitely. The "meaning" of "life" needs for the definition of both life and meaning - We're still discovering grey zones of what life is, and meaning is kinda an imaginary thing. Another example is "42?! That's not an answer!". "And 'The answer to everything' isn't a question" ~ From the book Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. We just generalize that for example: Speed per hour is a, defined static value, train A is something defined, train B is another defined thing, their stations are static in time, space and existence, and the moment the trains meet is at the exact spot math would break down into "I don't care to count that many decimals". I mean; to define everything in that math question, you already need to know everything that happened in order to get the trains' general speed. And that's with presumably a human made stop watch that doesn't count in number*infinity/1 yknow? That's all fine, but generalize the entire universe with such big integers and all the laws of physics are dumbed down to the idea made out of a 'limited' brain explaining 'infinity'. ... (next up is me stopping to hack on humanity's lack of understanding, and instead hack on some humans' lack of understanding' That's kinda why I think it's kinda against anti God-religions to say that a priest knows the word of God. That limited mind, translating 'infinity and beyond'... who do you think that you are? And why would your guess be better than flipping a coin made of God made metal? (I mean no offense. you do you, and do it good. if you feel it you feel it. and if someone else feels differently, just don't start fighting = peace on earth, yknow?)
.... Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Romans 6.23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus
I actually fell asleep to this. I fell into some sort of loop of dreams it felt real another bad dream after another it was like a sleep paralysis I’d wake up in the dream thinking it’s reality to wake up again not being able to make a sound or move just to wake up again in the same state not in reality although feeling so real I woke up for real thinking I slept all night, I can’t count how many times I woke up from a dream in a dream but that whole time it was about 45 min sleep of pure terror, I feel off I checked my eyes in the mirror my pupils were so dilated it feels like the after math of a bad shroom trip, I’m not sure if something’s wrong with me but it was probably one of the scariest and realest dreams I ever had.
Bunch of haters and nitpickers on here, watch something else if you just want to complain? Literally thousands of other videos on youtube. No reason to have a bad time.
Argument, proposition, term ... Term is sign from which simple proposition is made, and sign is that which represents to a cognitive power something other than itself. Proposition, is speech in which truth and falsity is found. And an argument is speech from which something else necessarily follows. And consequently an argument is made of two parts that from which something follows, which is called antecedent, and that which follows, called consequent. When I say: 'Whatever produces a round shadow is itself round. Earth produces a round shadow. Therefore, Earth is round.' The antecedent is the part before "therefore" and the consequent, the part after it. Division of Philosophy: Modern and Traditional; With this much said we can talk about the two divisions of philosophy. What is calling government is divided into tyrannical, democratic, etc. as being kinds of governments as well as executive, legislature and judiciary as being it's parts. Likewise philosophy is divisible into modern and traditional in its kinds and natural philosophy, logical philosophy and moral philosophy. Kinds of dance are distinguished into traditional and modern, so too with philosophy, being divided into modern philosophy and traditional philosophy. Modern means recent and comes from 'modus', and traditional means transmitted and comes from 'tradere' which means transmitted. Modern and traditional philosophy can also be divided into parts but the utility of which a division might only be neeeded in the whatever context which a division is made. The way in which modern philosophy is sometimes divided is logic, epistemology, aesthetic, metaphysics and ethics but this is more like the division that arises from object to which attention happen to be paid just like in linguistics is united by the fat that their area of study is language each branch is demarcated as distinct from another based on what about language they happen to study, for e.g. it is based on what they study that phonetics and phonology are marked out as distinct from syntax, morphology, pragmatics, etc. while the manner in wich they study sound itself distinguishes phonetics and phonology from eachother, for phonetics studies sound in isolation but phonology in some relation. In the partition of philosophy into three, by 'natural'. It is meant that it is not made by man, thus natural philosophy includes mathematics, metaphysics and general physics and its parts. Logical philosophy studies concepts as they are ordered among themselves while moral philosophy studies voluntary ad actions in so far as they are ordered to an end.
I have one I like to call "The Pinocchio Paradox", If Pinocchio says "My nose will grow soon" what actually would happen? If it doesn't grow, then he lied and his nose will grow, making it truth. But if he told the truth, why did it grow?
Nice, gonna fall asleep real nicely to this one I can already tell. Good night
Just like in college
this is SO funny
Not with all those ads!
@@bmyers6831😂
Wait y'all okay?
i love how you’ve sounded a bit more enthusiastic about the content your making recently :) i love this video so far (im listening while im at work)
I bet we're all either at work or sleeping
@@514BMXJay
I'm still not finished listening to the whole 162-minute-long video. I've listened to bits while working, taking a shower, walking the dogs, and eating. Also, I pause the video to sometimes comment.
Otoh, I've never listened to youtube videos while I'm falling asleep or sleeping. I like a fan blowing in my room and no other noises.
.....
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
Finally another philosophy iceberg to binge watch
TIER 1: 1:08
TIER 2: 21:38
31:15 Mereology
36:10 Meta-ethics
Absolutely astounding! Deep, in depth, powerful and I love the improvements you’ve made over the first one, great work man, you’re really going places
......
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
Agreed my friend I love this and with the integrity it can dish out and recognize is intriguing I can view this compared to my world this would be my example of a non existent circle.
ChatGPT does wonders in writing scripts
@@bmyers6831 hater ff
The fact this got recommended to me without me literally even having notifications on is mad
anyways another iceberg video
Keep up the good work brother
@@s0urp0wer5yeah daddy knows what we like
YT recommend depending on the video you watch
@ErdemtugsC Well yeah
This is the second video where I see you commenting exactly the same
@@papita5739 No?
Ive watched your vids since near the beginning and you legitimately have made a lot of progress not just in your tech quality/script/editing but your presentational skills have improved dramatically. Good job! 👍
Dank comment
Yesssss I’m so happy for him
notice he stopped replying to the compliments, thats a sign of maturity as well
If nobody can beat goku, can Goku defeat nobody?🤔 Stay with me now.
We don't know because not enough information
Knowing goku he probably could haha
Indeed, nobody is undefeatable.
can u stu?
and gro up
This adds value to my philosophy degree. Thank you for remaking it.
i'm glad you remade this properly
31:10 mereology (wow wasnt even in my spellcheck vocabulary) reminds me of the thought process of how examing atoms on a molecular level resembles vast similarities with observing planets and galaxies on a cosmeic level. Theres another term for the perpetual scaling in size that alludes me.
30 mins in for this to be my first video of yours and you earned my sub. My only suggestion would be time stamps really benefits a video like this.
Adding in my thoughts on optimistic determinism and how it correlates with nature and nurture. The thought experiment of if the entire human race became deterministic would reflect heavily on a precedent for education through nature and nurture.
Overall Great work and well put together!
Wow great comment. Thanks for watching bro, hope to see you in comment sections in the future 👊
the gift/curse of being an emergence is that were in between worlds.
Bro it’s cool you acknowledge the short comings of the first vid and are remaking it at a higher quality. Great channel you deserve the subs you get
i wish it was a more common practice.
Hi phisosipher here. First off, love the video, glad to see you're making such a long video on something that can be very niche. As well as just diving right into it.
I'm still on the first layer, but you have had a few mistakes. For example the tripartite soul isn't necessarily about knowledge per say, but about that nature of humanity. What you explained JTB tripartite which is attributed to Plato. But in Thesseus he's seen arguing against it. Buy knowing what Plato believed is quite hard same with what he actually thought up given the nature of his work. You've also mispronounced a few things too. :3 but all in all I'm glad to see this!
Love these videos to listen to while I work or exercise! Getting the greatest pump while learning about foundationalism
"my pronunciation in the old video was bad " "ohm nah science..."
I just know that clicking on "render video" had to be such a satisfying moment
What's with the weird sfx at 40:40? Scared the shit out of me lmao
Wanted to make sure you were paying attention lmfao
This was so clearly written by chatgpt. So many repetitions and synonymous sentences
FACTS
This is a question mark ?
Yknow some people just have a monotone way of taking notes lil bro
@@Prod-Fresh its clearly ai lil bro
and mispronounciations
Mental, love this kinda content, hope the algorithm blesses you
A friendly and respectful suggestion if you don't mind, before you do another video about philosophy, look up the pronunciations of the names of the philosophers, and the schools of thought.
You must be so much fun at parties
@@Pp-wr6ho if you're watching this there's hilariously good chance you DON'T get invited to parties. 😂❤
Agreed. He butchered so many names.
carl juhng made me giggle
You wouldn't know any pronunciations if you just ask chatgpt to write the script, just saying
Great overview of philosophy's critical branches! Emphasizing epistemology and metaphysics not only deepens our understanding of the world but also enhances our decision-making processes, which is crucial for personal and professional growth. 🌟
THE HELL BRO? ALMOST 3 HOURS OF WORK??? ARE YOU STILL ALIVE BROTHER?
lol, writing and sourcing all this takes a lot more than three hours. I figure he likely spent several weeks full time to write this.
gain iq
He is obviously talking about all the work that went into a 3 hour product
@@Paraselene_Taoyou come off as pedantic to the smart person you're pretending to be.
Actually, anyone could put something like this together in a couple hours. Or has everyone forgotten of A.I. like Claude, or Chat GPT? Lol
Take a shot whenever he mispronounces a word! I died in the first 15 minutes
37:45 My understanding of essentialism is imagine a chair, there are many different kind of chairs, expensive ones, made of gold, or cheap ones made of wood, or even just a wood stump. but they are all "chair" and are univercially reconised chair, there for there must be a "ideal, perfect chair that is the most chair of all chair" out there, the esscences of a chair, what makes a chair chair if you will.
This also apply to eveything, like the "ideal idea of a circle" or "ideal idea of language" so on and so forth.
Absolutely love this breakdown! I've been digesting philosophy part by part for years and this is an excellent overview. Be sure to follow up any questions with further research on the topic. This should be a springboard into more specific field research. Those struggling to understand art should explore aesthetic philosophy. If you have a religious belief you hold strongly maybe start looking through theology as a whole to have some context for what you believe compared to others. Lots of other examples are implied but basically keep growing!!
A deep dive of philosophy like this begs the question of if it is all pointless, if we are “thinking too deep about nothing” (spoiler alert philosophy is needed).
Many will brush off philosophical questions as unapplicable to real life, a purely meaningless theoretical that only distracts from reality. Their main evidence being that you can imagine what does not exist. When you do imagine, question, etc without checking the real world, eventually (or instantly) you will become entirely divorced from reality and so become meaningless.
But on the other side of the coin, knowledge by itself is meaningless. Let’s say a person only knows that a cup filled with water is easy to drink from. Sure they can use this knowledge to drink from the cup and be satisfied for life. But with simple questioning they could imagine a bigger cup and create that or a lid for the cup to keep the water for later, etc. Knowledge is only good for the exact moment it is needed. Even if you have two puzzle pieces of knowledge, missing the connecting piece, it is impossible to find this clear hole without some level of questioning and thought. (The old urban legend of NASA spending billions of dollars to make a pen work in space while USSR just used pencils, you can have all the knowledge you need to solve this problem but miss the solution without thought).
All of reason is based on philsophy, and is impossible to exist without. Reason needs to be justified through thought, questioning, and debate.
So take this as a love letter to your video and to philosophy itself, as it is the most important part of who we are, and it is not some form of “thinking too deep” it is truth
Mr goofer, u used metapgysics logic, which IS meaningless. We use 'meaningless knowledge' to interact with ppl, its existing because we exist(society), if we close eyes on why it exists it automatically seems 'meaningless', while in truth ur talk is meaningless. hehehhaw
Me about ur analysis of knowledge
Also, go check 1st question(and its 3 levels) of philosophy and lectures, its better than goofy icebergs or things made to satisfy our wantings(popular philosophy)
Thanks for making this. I am writing notecards for my zettelkasten. I will be a philosophy whiz after this.
philosophy is cool ;) loved it man
*clicks on video*
"phil-"
*an ad plays*
I love your stutters
.....
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
Some funny pronunciation but I appreciate the video haha. Leaving a comment for the algorithm
Bro remaking a video to correct pronunciation and grammatical errors and then still mispronouncing and using wrong words is so on brand for this type of TH-camr
Awesome work! Surely did not feel like 3 hours to listen to. :)
Bro you post this while I'm in the middle of work ;-;
Damn, you really paid money for this channel.
@@ThePhreakass Yea, so?
@@corrupted7983 Should have done something meaningful with it. TH-cam is free, you know?
@@ThePhreakass Thank you for your opinion, but my opinion is supporting my favorite TH-cam Content Creators. Thank you and come again.
@corrupted7983 "my favorite TH-cam Content Creators" you should get outside and touch grass
Lmfao. I just watched your 25-minute-long philosophy tier list yesterday, and my last comment basically boiled down to, "Bro, this could a much longer video with a much better rubrick of some kind, and maybe the rubrick could be made by seeing how philosophy is broken into fields." Then you released this nearly 3-hour-long beast. 😅 It's eerily as if you heard my comment and were like, "Okay, let's release the BIG ONE." I haven't watched all the way through yet (released to public only 44 minutes ago), but I'm sure it's way more in-depth than the tier list, and I'm guessing the video will probably cover the idea (another thing I commented about on the tier list video) that these philosophies are complexly overlapping. Many of these philosophies overlap or lead back and forth to one another. I see modern or contemporary philosophies as one large system of thought, or one big interlinked conversation about what the hell is happening in this universe. Thanks.
Good job, you just made a comment longer than the video that you didn't watch. You should go make some IRL friends
@@davidmarlowe9393 lol wtf wrongs with this one now haha its crazy, people literally tell you their biggest fears when they try to insult you. i take it you didnt do well trying to make those irl friends lol.
keep blessing us with this
I just wanna say good shit for acknowledging the shortcomings of previous videos and improving!
another great video from Snooki.
This was cool, I learned a lot and a lot went over my head
I tried to fall asleep to this, but every time you say beings it sounds like beans. I'm giggling too much at these philosophical theories on legumes for this to work
Great video man, keep it up!
Everyone’s been following these rules to achieve “overall happiness” and everyone’s depressed.
I was gonna fall asleep to this but ended up taking notes lmao
"Casuality" 😂❤
Must be hard to spell everything right with 3 hour script
What does your video title mean?
Ignoring the entire content of a 3 hour video to correct 1 word you can clearly understand what it was supposed to be. Even said jokingly with love being a grammar nazi is just kinda lame and really undercuts everything said
@@nerdcorner2680 no. It clearly alienated most people who he's trying to talk to. That's kinda disrespectful
@@nerdcorner2680I can point out how stupid your defense of the video is. Wanna hear it dummy
@@nerdcorner2680he is calling the entire video scripted. What is really sad is the author being AI GENERATED SHIT. he cant pronounce half his words right. youd think youd have use a word first before using it in a ‘script’
12:01 No for real. I was researching art the other day and realized how dull our world is nowadays.
19:00 maybe it's my bias, but I think it would be interesting, cool, or perhaps wise to add Peter Singer's expansion of moral consideration to all sentient beings. I'm not vegan or vegetarian, and there are no AI or robotic sentient beings yet, but I think it's a good plan to include all sentient beings in our moral considerations. It's also shows how ethics continues to develop.
Tao sux
Tf yall talking about
Is there right and wrong in music?
@@malamstafakhoshnaw6992
Simply put, there seems to be no right or wrong in music. Music can be almost anything. It helps if the music follows convention & norms so listeners can recognize that it's music, but music can be very diverse.
Why?
I love your content so much! Thanks for making this
Essentialism basically states that there are core characteristics which are necessary for a person or thing to be that person or thing. A table can be made of many different materials, and come in different sizes and colors, but there are specific criteria that it retains to remain a table. The best analogy I can think of is a species holotype in biology, it's a representative of the characteristics that separate it from all other species. I hope that helps.
bro made a 3-hour long video to “correct his pronunciation” but still pronounced almost every philosophical term wrong 😔 “omni-science”
Fuck I got hung up on "causally" I just can't
😢
You didn't have to say that
THIS I FELL ASLEEP LAST NIGHT WATCHING THIS AND ALL I CPULD HEAR WAS HIM BUTCHERING WORDS 😂😂😂
yeah im 10 minutes in and this is just unbearable and sad. he needs to rewrite his script too bc it sounds like he made a ton of spelling errors, and if he didn't, he should just use an AI voiceover at this point because this is somehow worse. seriously got me wondering if he's dyslexic or has never seen a dictionary. anyways, i'm sparing my ears from this garbage, leaving a dislike, and finding something better.
I think that this video should have +15 minutes and +2 tiers and this could be perfect
Awesome video. Quite an improvement
That was fantastic it didnt feel like 3 hrs tbh
11:45 haha, yeah, some of it is pretty wild, but I think you and I can agree that "modern art" isn't a monolith. There are so many different kinds of "modern art" that it's hard for me to say one, general thing about all of it. One particular example (I think we can agree is included in "modern art") is Afremov's oil paintings. I guess he counts a bit toward impressionism (he doesn't fall neatly in that category, but it's close), and I find a lot of impressionism very nice. The abstract impressionism gets kind of hard for me to enjoy, but so long as I can reocognize what's occurring in the artwork, then I'm farily satisfied.
Also, I think it's important to repcgnize how "modern art" is at least three major categories (late 19th century to about 1970s (Afremov might even be counted as "contemporary" due being newer than "modern art")): cubism (which I find kind of odd, but interesting), expressionism (some of this is very cool or interesting art but can be a bit abstract for me), impressionism (probably my favorite one of these three so long as it's not too abstract). There are other groups going on (absurdism, surrealism, dada, fauvism, futurism...). I guess you might find all of them odd or uninteresting. That's okay, I guess. 😅
All of that said, if you enjoy forms of classical or neo-classical art, then I get it. They're very well made and can be very beautiful and deeply meaningful.
I think another part of how come art got so wild is that folks saw enough classical and neo-classical art, and they simply wanted something new. It had to test or break old boundaries. It had to show complex, chaotic life in a nonstructuralist manner. It had to be "new" art. Who knows if this is overall a good development? A patron can pay artists to create any genre they like to have made these days: just find an artist you like that does commission work and pay for it to get done. It may or may not turn out exactly how you want it. 😅 That's usually a rich person kind of activity depending on how popular the artist is..
====
A few days later, at 30:15, I noticed you have an Afremov painting in your video. Do you like or not like Afremov? Is he not modern or even contemporary? When you say you don't like modern art, are there exceptions to this statement? 😅
Tao sux
@@malamstafakhoshnaw6992
Would you like to explain further or is that all you have to say as a reply for my three comments? 😁
Sure, your subjectvity on an in essence an objective matter.
@@malamstafakhoshnaw6992
Okay. What's my subjectivity on what objective matter that you're telling me sux?
Art and philosophy.
Math was historically the "Queen of the Sciences". Theology wasn't even viewed as a 'science' until far more recently.
what a great video! how many hours did you invest in this? also dont listen to the people complaining, its still very informative. yes there are some mispronounciations, but one can learn very much about philosophy from this video
So atomic time is defined by the cycles of radiation around a cesium 133 atom, in which one “second” equals 9,192,631,770 cycles, right?
Now there’s the theory of observation in quantum mechanics that states, “by the very act of watching, the observer affects the observed reality.”
Stick with me- so time in itself can be observed and affected just by observing it. Basically a gritty, detailed version of why when we are focused on time and how slowly it’s moving, we are actively slowing time in our perception of reality.
Thinking about throwing away all hope of happiness or success by studying philosophy.
"yes, but have you considered why yo..."
Shutup Socrates, no one asked you.
"casuality"
3 minutes in and it’s been bothering me so much lol
@@xxcoolyo10xxNow how u feel about it
i thought he was saying kazuality at first
FAVORITE TH-camR.
glazing
Thank you brother for all this information and your hard work to even form it all together 🫡🫡🫡
Mology, sounds like the idea that all things are made of other things, with current science we understand that the smallest we can examine currently are phantom particles and quarks, even smaller somehow those are also made of "things". Currently the theory is that matter is made of energy (vibration/movement/heat/light etc...) that has transferred or lost enough momentum to be observed as "matter" or a thing that can be physically interacted with. Currently that is the dead end on the side of smaller pieces, although it is theorized that due to any measurable amount of space actually has an infinite amount of space, may mean that there could possibly be more smaller parts of what we can interact with that we currently have no technology that could verify this, as a tool to measure such small things requires nearly just as small things hitting them AND bouncing back to a sensor and enlarging the after image. Regardless it's simply theory. Similarly just as difficult to imagine or study, is the big side of things. As your tissues are made of cells, your body is made of tissues. The idea is that even if we don't know we are part of a larger organism or substance, it does not disprove the theory. This theory also hypotheses that things are part of INFINITELY larger things, and so on and so forth. Essentially, Mology is the idea that all things are separate yet connected in ways we simply have no way to observe, allmost as if its a 3D infinitely large fractal of infinitely different materials, made of infinitely smaller and unique materials. The value of this can be many things if not anything. We currently understand that different "unnatural" materials may be synthesized with natural materials put into specific shapes and builds of the smaller pieces, meaning that if we could effectively see, and move smaller and smaller materials, then we can effectively convert or even synthesize anything we want in the material and energetic spectrum. The idea additionally delves into the idea that the fabric of space itself is a legitimate material we can not sense, and the building blocks of the material or even the material itself could potentially reshape or change energy density and become matter itself. If such things are possible, my own theory is that space is a highly energetic ocean of unimaginably small "things" and so if some of these things slow down enough, flow would be disrupted, causing a massive shift in materials and eneries from the point of change and causing a chain effect out in a 3d bubble shaped wave in all directions. This idea would explain the concept of how and why eventually space may implode on itself. Matter would be made by the bumbing into of space into space, eventually this bumping slows down to a halt, and at that point, whatever the base version of space is would start to seep back into what we know as our space, and rebalance the energy causing the materials to return to its original state. This would also explain the idea of infinite big bangs, as space would be an infinite area full of this material/fabric, and energy must move somewhere, and with infinite space, energy would never stop moving entirely, at least not all at once. Anyway, philosophy itself is a wonder example of this as well, there and many of them and they are all unique in their own way, yet they are all a part of a larger truth or idea that could be infinitely complex.
Dude, once in this you said "Sorry if this is boring to some of you", two hours in. The ones still with you probably wouldn't last an hour if they thought this kinda stuff was boring ^^
nice, although it is complicated to do low levels of a philosophical iceberg without reaching Deleuze and Guattari, CCRU and maybe the more schizo and perhaps mystical areas of philosophy
I like long videos. Personally I want more of them.
Some parts of this seemed a bit rushed. Like you where in a hurry getting through. Not needed.
I had to leave about two hours in, but when I got back I just skipped back 20 seconds and continued from there. When I saw the length of your video I thought "That's it. That's what I'm after". But more important if I'd click your video is that you do what you enjoy, mkay?
Some ideas: Mistifications, linguistics, Forbidden Literature, Literature, cosmology and astrophysics, anthropology, videogame theories
Dude, you are Like Totally cool dude!!!
11:55 how much modern art do you know? I guess very little
Yo do u have any references? I genuinely wanna discover modern art!
@@YassirBouzagou what do you want to see? There’s millions of contemporary artist who do all sorts of stuff
The thing that most people don't understand is that aesthetics is not always the point of art.
Yeah i think he should just stick to the more formal Introduction but it is really hard to judge modern art
at its core at its core at its core
It is the channels goal. Ah yes hyperbole my favorite
Philosophys cool.
30 minute videos are good, but I do like these long form two plus hour videos every now and then.
Wish you could've released this video before I spent 4 years getting a Philosophy degree smfh
Every person that has learnt a language has been placed in the "Chinese Room"
This would be the ultimate philosophy iceberg if you will revise it and incorporate philosophy of science and its all recent sub-fields: philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of complexity and chaos, philosophy of information, philosophy of psychology, philosophy of earth science, philosophy of physics, philosophy of biology, philosophy of logic, philosophy of chemistry and pharmacology, philosophy of ecology, philosophy of cognitive science, philosophy of medicine, philosophy of engineering science, philosophy of economics, philosophy of linguistics and philosophy of anthropology and sociology. (source: Handbook of the Philosophy of Science by Elsevier)
And also summarize how the line of thought of western philosophy to idealism- new realism in the middle and late 19th century by the analytic but the continental took idealism more seriously even in the light of the success of modern science.
Man I’m just tryna be cracked at chivalry 2 not unravel life’s greatest mysteries while I define a entirely new play style in the funny sword game
Very interesting 😀. It would be great if you could complete the chaptering, so that we can easily access all the philosophies (including the ones after the anti-natalist 😅. Thanks). Great video otherwise 🙂
great video.
The Ultimate Sleepberg
Please bro make a video on reddit creepy stories your narration was awesome, continue the series ❤
Hater's are going to hate! Lover's going to love.. .. I chose the latter.
That was a great video!
You get me through work.
Babe wake up the crew new snook juat dropped!
Nonono 1:54:16 "Very similar to absurdity" sounds about right. 👍
Sorry, I wasn't listening too much - I like wisdom to razzle through my mind, like wind in a tree's crown ^^
I think that the 'ultimate truth' is All = All. But in order to make any sense of 'all' you have to define it, and here is where the lack of our observation and understanding puts forks in the road.
(I'm done here. the rest of text is just confusing examples of how to define "anything")
For a fork in the road (beyond the 'shadow reality' of "even ideas exist somewhere") to be truth, we must define the fork and the road as different entities, which means we have to define some atoms as 'fork' and some atoms as 'road', therefore we have to define what an atom is; electrons etc; and what electrons are, quarks (or what ever, strings, you get it). Also we have to disprove that there isn't an infinite chain of those building blocks containing building blocks containing building blocks etc.
(I am once again done, but I'll continue anyway, because f logic)
After we define 'these' atoms are fork and 'those' atoms are road, we have to exclude their exchange of matter, meaning that the electrons 'n energy interchanged is in a changing state. Easily to do this we could make an idea of an area; "What this fork form contains is 'fork'". Having done this we can throw 'defining what matter is fork' out the window, since now we have a 'fork form' which we could place anywhere around any matter; "This fork is made of wood in the tree that grew through the road", "This fork is made out of air because the form is there and you can't stop me".
Here we have combined "Beyond the 'shadow reality of ideas existing somewhere'" with the physical world (which we have yet to define down to its source of existence). So between guessing on what we have and imagining what we have, there we have a fork in the road of trying to figure out anything at all, beyond 'All=All'.
I find that often humans can't define the parts of the question, so the answer can't answer definitely. The "meaning" of "life" needs for the definition of both life and meaning - We're still discovering grey zones of what life is, and meaning is kinda an imaginary thing.
Another example is "42?! That's not an answer!". "And 'The answer to everything' isn't a question" ~ From the book Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
We just generalize that for example: Speed per hour is a, defined static value, train A is something defined, train B is another defined thing, their stations are static in time, space and existence, and the moment the trains meet is at the exact spot math would break down into "I don't care to count that many decimals".
I mean; to define everything in that math question, you already need to know everything that happened in order to get the trains' general speed. And that's with presumably a human made stop watch that doesn't count in number*infinity/1 yknow? That's all fine, but generalize the entire universe with such big integers and all the laws of physics are dumbed down to the idea made out of a 'limited' brain explaining 'infinity'.
...
(next up is me stopping to hack on humanity's lack of understanding, and instead hack on some humans' lack of understanding'
That's kinda why I think it's kinda against anti God-religions to say that a priest knows the word of God. That limited mind, translating 'infinity and beyond'... who do you think that you are? And why would your guess be better than flipping a coin made of God made metal? (I mean no offense. you do you, and do it good. if you feel it you feel it. and if someone else feels differently, just don't start fighting = peace on earth, yknow?)
This dude for sure had this written by chat gpt
....
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
Google's A.I Gemini loves Laplace's Demon. The shit it comes up with that is very interesting.
Can you please disclose if you used chatGPT for this script?
comment for laterrr looks goooood
Yooo snook philosophy drop 🗣️‼️‼️
🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️
I actually fell asleep to this. I fell into some sort of loop of dreams it felt real another bad dream after another it was like a sleep paralysis I’d wake up in the dream thinking it’s reality to wake up again not being able to make a sound or move just to wake up again in the same state not in reality although feeling so real I woke up for real thinking I slept all night, I can’t count how many times I woke up from a dream in a dream but that whole time it was about 45 min sleep of pure terror, I feel off I checked my eyes in the mirror my pupils were so dilated it feels like the after math of a bad shroom trip, I’m not sure if something’s wrong with me but it was probably one of the scariest and realest dreams I ever had.
"Pascal wager" is not any close to a philisophic argument but a joke Pascal made about people tring to prove god.
Bunch of haters and nitpickers on here, watch something else if you just want to complain? Literally thousands of other videos on youtube. No reason to have a bad time.
ACTUALLY REAL
Hey babe, wake up. Snook just posted
How do you mispronounce all these words having investigated enough for a 3hr vid. 🤦🏼♂️
He found the iceberg and input each entry into ChatGPT.
because he didn't do any research, he used a prompt. A big signifier on wether or not someone cares about what they talk about is pronunciation
Ya usually these guys will either use ai or plagiarize something someone already wrote up on the subject
It's super distracting
Seriously, just google it if you don't know the word, who can pay attention to the content when someone can't even speak?
Great audio quality this time
I listened to Alan Watts for years. One day I realized it actually had no value, basically just background noise....
Great! And pretty soon, when your existential time of the month comes, you'll need some ego death😂
Your loss
what is the common denominator ;) ?
Just met this guy on one tv he’s pretty cool
good night guys!❤
Argument, proposition, term
...
Term is sign from which simple proposition is made, and sign is that which represents to a cognitive power something other than itself. Proposition, is speech in which truth and falsity is found. And an argument is speech from which something else necessarily follows. And consequently an argument is made of two parts that from which something follows, which is called antecedent, and that which follows, called consequent. When I say: 'Whatever produces a round shadow is itself round. Earth produces a round shadow. Therefore, Earth is round.' The antecedent is the part before "therefore" and the consequent, the part after it.
Division of Philosophy: Modern and Traditional;
With this much said we can talk about the two divisions of philosophy. What is calling government is divided into tyrannical, democratic, etc. as being kinds of governments as well as executive, legislature and judiciary as being it's parts. Likewise philosophy is divisible into modern and traditional in its kinds and natural philosophy, logical philosophy and moral philosophy.
Kinds of dance are distinguished into traditional and modern, so too with philosophy, being divided into modern philosophy and traditional philosophy. Modern means recent and comes from 'modus', and traditional means transmitted and comes from 'tradere' which means transmitted. Modern and traditional philosophy can also be divided into parts but the utility of which a division might only be neeeded in the whatever context which a division is made. The way in which modern philosophy is sometimes divided is logic, epistemology, aesthetic, metaphysics and ethics but this is more like the division that arises from object to which attention happen to be paid just like in linguistics is united by the fat that their area of study is language each branch is demarcated as distinct from another based on what about language they happen to study, for e.g. it is based on what they study that phonetics and phonology are marked out as distinct from syntax, morphology, pragmatics, etc. while the manner in wich they study sound itself distinguishes phonetics and phonology from eachother, for phonetics studies sound in isolation but phonology in some relation.
In the partition of philosophy into three, by 'natural'. It is meant that it is not made by man, thus natural philosophy includes mathematics, metaphysics and general physics and its parts. Logical philosophy studies concepts as they are ordered among themselves while moral philosophy studies voluntary ad actions in so far as they are ordered to an end.
I have one I like to call "The Pinocchio Paradox", If Pinocchio says "My nose will grow soon" what actually would happen? If it doesn't grow, then he lied and his nose will grow, making it truth. But if he told the truth, why did it grow?