Orlinski. Les photos des deux chanteurs sont extraordinairement belles, soit dit en passant. 0:57 J.j.Orlinski semble se jouer de toutes les difficultés et s’amuser à chanter avec un enthousiasme communicatif.Magnifique !
@@baroqueandbeyondнравится, что Вы думаете об этом и отмечаю этот момент с момента подписки! Ну и отклик заглавию: моему слуху Орлински тут импонирует больше!
Orlinski tiene una voz muy homogénea, cálida y genuina, y me gusta más que Jaroussky, aunque éste también está en el top de los contratenores actuales.
Супер.... Красота.... Слушаю... Это очень помогает отвлечься от грозных разрушений и катастроф.... Брависсимо..... Держите ровную вокальную линию.... На уровне.... Высоком.... Очень красиво и все понятно.... Без перехода.... Брависсимо
Both men are amazing in terms of their ability to master the countertenor register. Jaroussky's tone might be a bit more sweet and limpid, but Orlinski has the better build. So there's that.
@@carmelarochamartinez1927 Thank you. I do not like Jaroussky's voice, although I have to admit he is a great skilled singer. I do not like Fagioli's either... In his case is not the voice he has but his vibrato is absolutely everywhere, after a while it becomes a nuisance to me. I recognise his achievements and technique but to listen to him in the long run... I cannot. I like Orlinski, Scholl and Mead (when he does not overuse vibrato).
Surprising how few recordings of this aria exist. It’s such a rombustuous piece that I imagine it should appeal to many more performers. Given the power of the aria and the voice needed to do it most justice I prefer Orlinski. The arrangement and orchestration is also far more exciting.
I do not need to choose. That I can tell one from the other is good enough. On second hearing, perhaps the orchestration for Orlinski is more subtle than for Jaroussky. Thank you for posting.
Philippe Jaroussky chante un texte ce qui est nullement secondaire. Parler du meilleur dépend également de la sensibilité de celui qui écoute. Et il y a des milliards de sensibilités!!😊😊
Oui,dommage de comparer,sauf pour soi-meme,puisque chaque voix et colorature correspondent au goût de chacun. Pour moi,Jarousski est le + "parfait",voix puríssima.A.Scholl est le + divin,le plus émouvant. Orlinski,voix voilée,plus commune,mais c'est une affaire de goût, encore une fois
Certainly Orlinski had the best timbre for this particular aria. Jaroussky’s voice is far to thin for an aria that demands the strength to match the power of the strings, especially the cellos.
I’ve commented on Mr Jaroussky’s boyishness, sounding immature. I think all of us agree that he’s a very serious artist with a beautiful voice. One person has said it’s all in the nature of his voice itself and he can’t change that. I don’t agree. It’s not in the sound of the voice itself; I guess he’s essentially a soprano. Other men are sopranos without the boyish quality. I think it’s in a little-kid manner Jaroussky has, not the voice itself.
I thought I would fall for Orlinski as I usually do. But maybe because the song itself, by Orlinski, didn't strike my fancy, I tried Jaroussky. And immediately, surprisingly, the song appealed to my heart. I'd be stupid if I thought it's due to Jaroussky's faster tempo, the first noticeable difference straightaway. Here, Jaroussky wins my vote.
Даже сравнивать смешно.В исполнении Жарусски всегда есть смысл и образ. Слушать его интересно.О технической стороне даже нет речи- совершенство.А оппонент исполняет как старательный ученик.Ни уму ни сердцу.При всем уважении к его поклонникам.
Sans problème Philippe jaroussky maîtrise totale. Orlinsky a encore du chemin pour arriver à sa cheville. Orlinsky ne finit pas ses fins de phrase. C'est comme comparer une 2 chevaux avec une rolls Royce
Les timbres sont tres différents : celui de Jaroussky est plus clair, plus brillant. J'adore Jakub, mais je trouve ici Jaroussky plus expressif, plus de nuances et de virtuosité.
How can Jaroussky sound less boyish, sugary? He cannot change his voice and make it sound masculine. Is it possible for him to turn all his sound technique upside down? He is an accomplished singer but he is on the feminine side, contrary to Orlinski (he did not sacrifice his masculine sound and worked to retain it). Hence Orlinski's popularity and success.
Orlinski,just perfect!❤
J. J . Orlinski ❤
Orliński voice sound very open and fully developed.
Jacub ❤
Orlinski
Orliński! ❤️😍
JAKUB JÓZEF ORLIŃSKI !
Both are amazing, but Orliński! ❤
Orlinsky for ever❤
J.J.Orliński
Orlinski. Les photos des deux chanteurs sont extraordinairement belles, soit dit en passant. 0:57
J.j.Orlinski semble se jouer de toutes les difficultés et s’amuser à chanter avec un enthousiasme communicatif.Magnifique !
Thank you, I thought that these particular photos were flattering for both artists and paired well together.
@@baroqueandbeyondнравится, что Вы думаете об этом и отмечаю этот момент с момента подписки! Ну и отклик заглавию: моему слуху Орлински тут импонирует больше!
JAKUB JÓZEF ORLINSKI !
Orlinski tiene una voz muy homogénea, cálida y genuina, y me gusta más que Jaroussky, aunque éste también está en el top de los contratenores actuales.
Jakub Orlinski by far
li amo tutti e due!!! Qui vince Philippe Jaroussky
Orlinski definitely!🙏👏👏👏🥰
Супер.... Красота.... Слушаю... Это очень помогает отвлечься от грозных разрушений и катастроф.... Брависсимо..... Держите ровную вокальную линию.... На уровне.... Высоком.... Очень красиво и все понятно.... Без перехода.... Брависсимо
Orlinski. No se porque. No tengo explicacion. Su voz para mi es como la flauta del flautista de Hamelin, solo me atrae y atrae.
Both men are amazing in terms of their ability to master the countertenor register. Jaroussky's tone might be a bit more sweet and limpid, but Orlinski has the better build. So there's that.
Orliński all the way❤
J. J. Orlinski
Absoulotely Orlinski!.. his Italian is definitely better...Orlinski has an outstanding Italian pronunciation!
It does not matter in which register Orlinski sings he always sounds masculine. Jaroussky is on the opposite edge... I prefer Orlinski.
Cierto
@@carmelarochamartinez1927 Thank you. I do not like Jaroussky's voice, although I have to admit he is a great skilled singer. I do not like Fagioli's either... In his case is not the voice he has but his vibrato is absolutely everywhere, after a while it becomes a nuisance to me. I recognise his achievements and technique but to listen to him in the long run... I cannot. I like Orlinski, Scholl and Mead (when he does not overuse vibrato).
JJO ; il est un des meilleurs au monde actuellement
Surprising how few recordings of this aria exist. It’s such a rombustuous piece that I imagine it should appeal to many more performers. Given the power of the aria and the voice needed to do it most justice I prefer Orlinski. The arrangement and orchestration is also far more exciting.
J.J.Orlinski était déjà extraordinaire en 2016 quand il chante cet aria avec la Capelle di Ospitale delà Piéta.
Jakub
Orlinski's version is more ethereal, Jaroussky's is more human and somatic. They're both so beautiful.
Orliński,my man
JJO the GOAT🎉🎉🎉🎉
Jakub,for me.
jakub obvious
Orlinski by a country mile
Orlinski, la voix est plus suave, moins aigu. que Philippe, je préfère le timbre de Jakub. l'enregistrement date de quand?
Orlinski perfeito ❤
I do not need to choose. That I can tell one from the other is good enough. On second hearing, perhaps the orchestration for Orlinski is more subtle than for Jaroussky. Thank you for posting.
Amazing the differences in their voices when compared back to back. Can't fault either.
Les timbres sont différents, respect à vous messieurs
Philippe Jaroussky chante un texte ce qui est nullement secondaire. Parler du meilleur dépend également de la sensibilité de celui qui écoute. Et il y a des milliards de sensibilités!!😊😊
JJO
Magníficos ambos...precioso...
JJO ❤️
Philippe Jaroussky nicht zu übertreffen! Fantastisch!!!
P. Jaroussky 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Ambos são fantásticos, mas talvez tivesse gostado mais de Orlinski
Oui,dommage de comparer,sauf pour soi-meme,puisque chaque voix et colorature correspondent au goût de chacun. Pour moi,Jarousski est le + "parfait",voix puríssima.A.Scholl est le + divin,le plus émouvant. Orlinski,voix voilée,plus commune,mais c'est une affaire de goût, encore une fois
Jaroussky. Jaroussky. Only. Just the best.
Jarousski
Jaroussky est plus virtuose ici.
Certainly Orlinski had the best timbre for this particular aria. Jaroussky’s voice is far to thin for an aria that demands the strength to match the power of the strings, especially the cellos.
Condivido pienamente l'acuta analisi! Complimenti!
orlinski
Obydwaj śpiewają pięknie, ale JJO chyba jednak bardziej brawurowo. Także jego głos, choć wysoki, to wciąż pozostaje męski
La instrumentación de jaroussky y su técnica son superiores . También su experiencia.Demos tiempo a Orlinski.
The only one - Jakub Józef Orliński !
I’ve commented on Mr Jaroussky’s boyishness, sounding immature. I think all of us agree that he’s a very serious artist with a beautiful voice. One person has said it’s all in the nature of his voice itself and he can’t change that. I don’t agree. It’s not in the sound of the voice itself; I guess he’s essentially a soprano. Other men are sopranos without the boyish quality. I think it’s in a little-kid manner Jaroussky has, not the voice itself.
Jaroussky
У Филиппа- образ,даже не зная языка интересно слушать.Безупречная фраза и интонация!
Jestem oddana fanką Orlińskiego ale Jaroussky to sopran a Orliński alt wiec jak tu porównywać 😀🍓
Get a recording by Franco Fagioli and I'll let you know.
I don't think he sings it. I think he would sound like a professional, nice bank clerk in this aria.
I thought I would fall for Orlinski as I usually do. But maybe because the song itself, by Orlinski, didn't strike my fancy, I tried Jaroussky. And immediately, surprisingly, the song appealed to my heart. I'd be stupid if I thought it's due to Jaroussky's faster tempo, the first noticeable difference straightaway. Here, Jaroussky wins my vote.
does PJ really sing a quicker tempo? how come that by seconds his version is a bit longer than JJO‘s? 😅
Даже сравнивать смешно.В исполнении Жарусски всегда есть смысл и образ. Слушать его интересно.О технической стороне даже нет речи- совершенство.А оппонент исполняет как старательный ученик.Ни уму ни сердцу.При всем уважении к его поклонникам.
I prefer Jaroussky. Gorgeous!
PJ! 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
both
Who cares both masters of their of their Art, we are so lucky.
Sans problème Philippe jaroussky maîtrise totale. Orlinsky a encore du chemin pour arriver à sa cheville. Orlinsky ne finit pas ses fins de phrase. C'est comme comparer une 2 chevaux avec une rolls Royce
However much I love Jaroussky, countertenor voice sounds better when you can tell it's s a man singing. So, JJO all the way.
Les timbres sont tres différents : celui de Jaroussky est plus clair, plus brillant. J'adore Jakub, mais je trouve ici Jaroussky plus expressif, plus de nuances et de virtuosité.
Jaroussky❤
Ils donnent tellement bonheur chacun à sa façon que je n'ai pas envie de les départager ❤
Jarrouski est magnifique aussi.
jestem Polką ale Jarussky
Naprawdę???
Je préfère l'interprétation et le timbre de Philippe Jaroussky.
Jaroussky’s voice is excellent. He can sing anything. But he needs to sound less boyish.
Not shines are very good.
How can Jaroussky sound less boyish, sugary? He cannot change his voice and make it sound masculine. Is it possible for him to turn all his sound technique upside down? He is an accomplished singer but he is on the feminine side, contrary to Orlinski (he did not sacrifice his masculine sound and worked to retain it). Hence Orlinski's popularity and success.
Both do it gorgeous.. Orlinski is more soprano voice and Jarouski like mezzo... I prefer Philippe Jarousky version 💙👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👑
Orlinski
JJO
Jakub
Jaroussky