@@intothevoid5074 Yeah, It must have been in the early eighties when I took my one and only IL62 Flight on LOT. I worked for British Airways and went LOT for the great experience. Remember it well.
@@intothevoid5074unfortunate? the plane is a flying coffin! Its thanks to POLAND that LOT ił-62ms had extra control wires installed, engine monitoring systems, fire retardant materials AND fire alarms. The Russians didn't care
+David Herbant I like how yo scream Russian power yet the fact that they are loud makes Em' shit, aside from the engines and aircraft being shit already
This aircraft reminds me of a Soviet very old version of a CRJ or MD-82 where they doubled the engines, expanded the cabin as well as it's range and made it hella loud!
Its not myth but I get what you're saying. Soviet engineering was amazing given the lack of resources. But the culture around safety was problematic in Russia. The Soviet government would hide crashes rather than investigate faults, which is what made these planes somewhat unsafe. There's a lack of history when these were more common, and we'll never know why certain Soviet crashes occurred since the information was covered up (this goes for all Soviet planes). Sure, if maintained these will likely keep going. But all planes have fatal flaws. The only reason Boeings are so safe is because these flaws get publically recognized and subsequently fixed.
idk about well maintained...those engines look way overdue for a paint job. Lack of paint = increased corrosion = higher likelihood of future metal fatigue. With these birds as old as they are, that's highly problematic.
GamleErik100 finally somebody who is on my side,Soviet planes are just as reliable like other airplanes,it's just a myth that Soviet planes are unreliable
...Spotted on the tarmac at 2:06...the prime number 251. Two arrangements of its digits form perfect powers: 125 (5 x 5 x 5) and 512 (2 to the 9th power) ! A third arrangement is difference of 6 cubed and 1 cubed (215).
I have to admit, when I flew one of these from Washington DC to Moscow (Aeroflot, 1996) I was a bit scared of it. Now, I'm fascinated by it. Can't get enough.
That sound is just amazing!Soloviev D-30s are quite underrated;I still love Western engines but this is the engine from the East that offers some spicy competition!
Find it interesting at Old Soviet turbine engines have such a high pitched sound compared to American jets from the same time period. The Boeing 727 roars where as the IL-62 shrieks.
What a beautiful sound. From 4:55 on it sounds a bit like engines 2 and 3 spool up first, then by about 5:07, 1 and 4 spool up?? Just my ears or is that right? The amount of times i listen to this fantastic vid has to be illegal....
This airplane was actually quite impressive. It has an incredible range for a plane from 1960! Over 5,000 miles with 200 passengers (give or take). It was, when first introduced, the largest jet airliner ever. The engines were a bit weak for such a large plane though... 107.9 kN (as compared to about 250 kN on most jets of the same size nowadays).
One of the most reliable Soviet airplanes! It is a pity at us in Russia such don't fly any more, it is a pity ! Europe and the USA told us that our airplanes bad and our governors fools replaced them all with Boeings and Airbuses ! So that I envy you the Korean airlines ! :о) To the author many thanks for video !!! ... Один из самых надёжных советских самолётов ! Жаль у нас в России такие уже не летают, очень жаль ! Нам Европа и США сказали, что наши самолёты плохие и наши правители дураки заменили их все на Боинги и Эйрбасы ! Так, что я вам завидую Корейские авиалинии ! :) Автору огромное спасибо за видео !!!
***** Early versions of the IL-62 did have reliability issues with engines, but many issues were solved in the IL-62M. Between 1989 and 2009, no fatalities occurred despite the highest number of examples in service. The IL-62 also has a lower hull loss rate than either the Boeing 707 or the DC8. The airframe is also very strong, designed to survive an emergency landing with the gear up. The tradeoff of course is more weight. The IL-62M also has a 50-year service life rating, quieter and more reliable Soloviev D30-KU turbofans, and was regarded as a very comfortable aircraft, especially during turbulence, and well liked by pilots.
Tuve el privilegio de volar en uno de estos aviones en 1992 por CUBANA. Ciertamente ese es el sonido!. Lo que nunca supe, era que fuese tan peligroso. Mi vuelo, en particular fue espectacular: Buenos Aires-La Habana. Bonitos recuerdos.
Just modify the engine location of each pair.place one from each pair above and behind the other two just below the drag so that the engines form an inclined upper half of hexagon ; the pair near the drag forming the upper two points of the inclined hexagon.
Looking very similar to the original tail-mounted four-engined VC10, the IL-62 concept was drawn up in 1960, a few years after the design of the VC10 was agreed upon. The first VC10 flew in early 1962, and the first IL-62 in 1963. The engine noise on the IL-62 is very loud when compared to the VC10, which had a very pleasing engine idle note when taxiing. I have heard many times that the IL-62 design was a logical step and had nothing to do with stolen designs, but then again so was the design of the TU-144 ('Concordski') and the Buran (space shuttle).
Careful what you wish for. That thing had a lot of crashes back in its early days. Now It's probably upgraded, and therefore a lot safer,but I still wouldn't want to fly on this plane.
@@zygi22 The reason for those crashes was the lack of respect for safety in the USSR and how they covered up the causes of plane crashes. With the USSR dissolved, it's probably much more safer.
Wait ,Wait , I'm on the wrong plane !!!! That Cessna is the plane I'm supposed to be on HELLO !!!! OMG where these bargain seats , listen to that spool up whine !!! 20 min of that is enough to go insane let alone hours ... Its best to listen to this with good head phones and volume cranked up to get the true headache effect !!!!!
Said to the point. I have actually worked on those planes. I wrote extensive reply to Ferimarshani comment below, therefore will skip repeating the same here.
The Ilyushin IL-62 was one of the most rugged planes built by the Soviet Union, comparable to the Douglas DC-9. Russian aircraft in general are primitive but built well. If we look at hull loss rate, both the DC-8 and the Boeing 707 are more dangerous than the IL-62M.
nigahiga6400 - but if you compare fatalities per hull-loss accidents, or fatalities divided by number of aircraft produced you find that an accident with a IL-62 is more likely to end in fatalities than either the 707 or the DC-10.
These old Soviet engines noisy but reliable, while the modern low-noise motors can get out of order at hit of volcanic dust, these old engines are less susceptible to dust.
Reliable? Actually the very contrary. Polish Airlines lost two planes and 260+ lives because of them. What is however outrageous about it, first Polish disaster happened in 1980, manufacturer did not corrected problems. Second (for the same reason) happened in 1987, yet again manufacturer actually denied the very existence of problems and did nothing. Third incident occurred in 1990 (again same reasons, thanks God happier end by pure luck), yet again manufacturer did nothing. Last known (to me) incident happened in 2008, which suggest manufacturer, despise full knowledge of critical life threatening deficiencies and huge loss of human life in past, actually NEVER corrected problems. Search TH-cam for “flight 5055” video, as well “IL-62 el Santo Domingo” (aftermath of successful emergency landing by Cuban Airlines in 2008, after engine explosion). Polish Aviation Magazine published in 80-ties article in which there is summary made by Polish government commission regarding engine’s deficiencies. Besides what commission found to be the be direct cause of disaster (which is explained very well in mentioned video of flight 5055), commission found numerous other scandalous deficiencies in manufacturing process and quality control, including and not limited to: nonmetallic pollution in engine’s shaft material, lack of any kind of finish beside rough one, etc etc. Some Russians, might try to tell you Il-62 safety statistics match western counterpart’s planes of same era and that all disasters are currently known, even impossible to hide. You have to understand however they just tell you what they hear in their TV and there is no country (maybe beside North Korea) on the face of planet, where population is more brain washed by aggressive psychological warfare type anti-western propaganda. This is not true. Soviets were renowned for not admitting their disasters and incidents. No one till this day knows for sure how many IL-62 had crashed and how many people lost their lives in them. Seek western newspaper old article (as for instance fire of IL-62 in Boston USA), which no official (Russian or other) statistic even mentions. Same goes to mentioned 1990 incident.
FlyerKBOS I also may collect statistics about the American aircraft accidents, catastrophe Polish IL-62, does not count, it is peculiar Poles with poor maintenance. They even managed on TU-154, destroy their government in place with the President. On a wider scale this aircraft was operated in the USSR, with the small percentage of accidents, Ilyushin aircraft is a symbol of reliability, and those accidents were caused by humans and not planes.
***** "collect statistic about the American aircraft'? Have you even read my post? Why bother replying to something you not even reading? What point would have collecting American statistics if USSR's ones are falsified? What you want it to compare to? I happened to work on IL-62 in particular, in Polish Airlines for some years. Polish Airlines did not have facilities, expertise, but most important Russian permission (license) to service airplane's engines (which were cause of polish disasters), hence how could they have "poor maintenance"? Are you quoting some senseless Russian propaganda myths? How could they maintenance badly something they did not maintenance at all? Engines from planes were taken out in one piece, shipped to Russia (for maintenance and check up), from where they were coming back with certificates allowing it to be operated by such and such number of hours. If you interested in subject, search YT for "Black Serial, Kabaty" to find account of Polish side, how Russians really were trying to bully out and deny their fault in Polish disasters. For years, contrary to polish government commission findings, they were claiming engines destruction were result of plane crash not it cause, despise fact that part of engines were recovered over 200 km from a disaster site (over area where engines exploded and plane started to experiencing an emergency). They could not deny their fault any more, once 3 years after disasters identical plane managed to safely land after another yet engine explosion. Torn apart engine was simply constituting undeniable evidence. They could not say anymore its damage was result of crash, as plane never crashed. Polish TU-154 which crashed, is believed by large percentage of polish population to be result of an assassination plot, while by official Russian version it is result of pilot error. No poor maintenance were even ever alleged by anyone. Check your sources. Quote: "On a wider scale this aircraft was operated in the USSR, with the small percentage of accidents.." Entire point of end of my post is - what percentage of planes operated in USSR (but even in entire Warsaw Pact block, to some degree) had crashed or had incidents is unknown as provided by USSR (AND some Warsaw Pact countries at some times) statistics are falsified. Also Polish communist government, was trying to hide some disasters in early decades after WW2. Some time after Stalin death, USSR grip on Poland eased and in result this practice was eventually abandoned. If you really feel you know what you talking about, and the plane is safe, why not take a flight on it and post as video from it on YT? I know personally more than few pilots who flew it 20+ years and are scare of flying it. After working on it and knowing Russian practices, I'm scare of flying it, yet in reality, its hard to imagine any circumstance any of us would need to fly Il-62 ever again. Writing all this might be only out of regard of lives of people in countries which still operates the IL-62. But heck, maybe you're just better expert or hero than all of us! Believe what pleases you and happy flying!
FlyerKBOS You have written a lot of, I don't have time to argue with stubborn American. If you think you live in the most fair and democratic country in the world, you are deeply mistaken, you lied always, and not less than Councils. Although I'm not a big expert on aviation, but I must say that the reliability of Russian aircraft is not inferior to Western, and your examples of problems with the Il-62 just a trifle on the background of long-term operation of this aircraft. As for the Polish Tu-154, on Board was Kaczynski, explicit Russophobe and a falsifier of history by the case of Katyn, whether it was a terrorist attack do not know, God punished him.
***** Kaczynski - despise his deficiencies and controversies, recognized even in Poland, was not trying to falsify history about Katyn, to contrary, was trying not to allow it to be falsified by Putin, quite possibly, that's why he was murdered too. To remind, till Jelcyn, USSR and Russia was lying about its involvement there. Even Russia eventually admitted guilt, Putin, former KGB officer, (formerly know as NKVD - which did murdering in Katyn), denied NKVD officers should be treated as criminals or have even their veteran benefits taken away. This show where his real loyalties lay - to former NKVD butchers, his buddies. Showing his ugly face in Katyn with flowers, where he was bubbling hypocritically how bad communist was (as if he was not the core communist himself) and how terrible the crime was (while granting at the same time rewards to murders), was as much tactful, as visit of Gestapo officer in Auschwitz. Stubborn American? Maybe its not me who is stubborn American but you who are stubborn Ruskie? Which is the true?
Air Koryo of North Korea can land any Russian Built Aircraft like the Ilyushin 62M as seen to any Airports Including Singapore. Singapore Changi Airport Terminals Can handle these Aircraft.
What an amazing engine sound. A rare aircraft. It must have been a thrilling experience.
bananamanuk TBP HYMAR
The unsafest plane
@@wojciechlatos8700 the il62 has cost just over 500 lives. Nothing compared to the 737, 727 and 747
greta thunberg official i'know but it likes as a vickers VC-10
@@wojciechlatos8700 ok but il62 is better
Remember flying in a LOT IL62 from London to Warsaw years ago.....loved every bit of the trip....
geoff bell we Poles (Polish People) no longer use the Il-62M in passenger service. How unfortunate.
@@intothevoid5074 Yeah, It must have been in the early eighties when I took my one and only IL62 Flight on LOT. I worked for British Airways and went LOT for the great experience. Remember it well.
@@Be03008 When and who did you fly for?
@@intothevoid5074unfortunate? the plane is a flying coffin! Its thanks to POLAND that LOT ił-62ms had extra control wires installed, engine monitoring systems, fire retardant materials AND fire alarms.
The Russians didn't care
very nice steady camerawork on departure. I assume it was very loud considering your proximity to the engines? Quite a whistle they have!
Instablaster
1:06.....Pre-flight announcements have ended for those at the rear!
UPGF54860 D30KU power :)
UPGF54860 I accidentally played the takeoff roll part at full volume and woke up my neighbor's dog :P
RUSSIAN POWER
+David Herbant I like how yo scream Russian power yet the fact that they are loud makes Em' shit, aside from the engines and aircraft being shit already
They are not shit. No one fucking understands vintage beauty. But first please learn how to speak English please. Thank you very much.
oliver driggs Not much louder than Boeing 777 with its GE90 engines to be honest.
One of the most amazing startup sequences I've heard. Awesome.
Truly incredible. I will never get tired of hearing the IL-62 startup and spool up. Amazing job.
Best alarm clock
I love the sound of these engines, it's on par with the RB211! Absolutely love the Approach & Landing Video too! Thanks!
Engine sound is pure bliss!!!
That engine sound rivals that of the Boeing 717 and McDonnell-Douglas MD-80!
Hell yeah!!!!
717 engines, you can clearly hear the LP and the HP turbine on takeoff 🤟
okay engine sound from the 50/60ies....but they were comparatively strong and reliable for their time....wonderful !!!
That engine sound is ORGASMIC!!!!
These engine sounds are something I will very much miss...
Wow, thanks for that excellent video! The sound of those engines spooling up sends shivers of excitment down my spine! Music to my ears!
Wow, that sound is just beautiful
The Soloviev D-30/Aviadvigatel PS-30 Makes Som Eerie Noise On Startup
Their screaming sound is like a melody to me. I would love to ride on an Il-62 or Tu-134. th-cam.com/video/BgtWK4C9Grk/w-d-xo.html
1:03 satisfying sound
This aircraft reminds me of a Soviet very old version of a CRJ or MD-82 where they doubled the engines, expanded the cabin as well as it's range and made it hella loud!
IL-62M is like the Soviet combination of Vickers VC-10 and MD-80 due to the higher bypass turbofans.
The engine startup sounds like someone abducted by UFO lol
Beautiful engine sound, love it! :)
this plane seemed to have a very difficult time climbing out of Beijing. I would be scared to death.
HOWEVER,this plane is actually really rugged,comparable to DC-9s,even 707s and DC-10s
***** Looks fine tbh, those engines are beasts anyways. And from what i can see it looks very well maintained.
Its not myth but I get what you're saying. Soviet engineering was amazing given the lack of resources. But the culture around safety was problematic in Russia. The Soviet government would hide crashes rather than investigate faults, which is what made these planes somewhat unsafe. There's a lack of history when these were more common, and we'll never know why certain Soviet crashes occurred since the information was covered up (this goes for all Soviet planes). Sure, if maintained these will likely keep going. But all planes have fatal flaws. The only reason Boeings are so safe is because these flaws get publically recognized and subsequently fixed.
idk about well maintained...those engines look way overdue for a paint job. Lack of paint = increased corrosion = higher likelihood of future metal fatigue. With these birds as old as they are, that's highly problematic.
GamleErik100 finally somebody who is on my side,Soviet planes are just as reliable like other airplanes,it's just a myth that Soviet planes are unreliable
Wow 4 engines on the back! The planes rear must be heavy!
Flying Miner They are quite small though compared to most engines you see today.
FlightFilms. Yup, its the only plane with rear support wheel under those engines.. Lots of frame stress back there.
The Vickers VC-10 also had a similar design
This old bird used to be the backbone of transsiberian air-travel. Now its either a 330 or a 777... They are more comfortable, yes, but boring as hell
When it comes to air travel, boring is a good thing.
gcc geo boring worries me.
But those new 777s have those ge-90 engines, which are massive
I prefer the Concorde over this. Concorde is more thrilling, more power and its not boring
@@gccgeo8028 Not really.
I want to go to North Korea just to fly this plane.
Not anymore you don't.
Cuban has these in their Cuban Air fleet
joshua boggs Do they still?
joshua boggs they dont anymore
I want to fly all their retro aircraft, it's a real dream
Listen to the engines scream and roar!!!! That’s what I’m talking about. ❤ thanks for sharing! 😍😍😍
What a nice, beautyful sound of these wunderful engines...Would like to fly with one of those airplanes. Russian engine = LOUD!!!
This sound is loud but amazing!
turbo jets and low bypass jets = Rock n Roll!
Plus North Korean airline
TU-154 AND TU 134 HASNT NOT TV BUT HE HAVES LOUD ENEGIES
Amazing video! Just felt like I was on board this classic bird! Love the sound of those engines! Thank you for sharing! :)
Great! Amazing video experience. Thank you, my heart beats seeing this.
I was expecting those engines to burst into flames any second.
Also, just watching this video made my ears pop
...Spotted on the tarmac at 2:06...the prime number 251. Two arrangements of its digits form perfect powers: 125 (5 x 5 x 5) and 512 (2 to the 9th power) ! A third arrangement is difference of 6 cubed and 1 cubed (215).
I have to admit, when I flew one of these from Washington DC to Moscow (Aeroflot, 1996) I was a bit scared of it. Now, I'm fascinated by it. Can't get enough.
their planes are old but in a perfect condition !
BadenCityFire Suprisingly well maintained i must say.
yes I know ;-)
They can't afford a crash, that would just simply be a true PR disaster for North Korea...
That sound is just amazing!Soloviev D-30s are quite underrated;I still love Western engines but this is the engine from the East that offers some spicy competition!
Il62 does not have soloviev d30 engines, it has kuznetsov nk8
4:55 R. I. P
Find it interesting at Old Soviet turbine engines have such a high pitched sound compared to American jets from the same time period. The Boeing 727 roars where as the IL-62 shrieks.
What a beautiful sound. From 4:55 on it sounds a bit like engines 2 and 3 spool up first, then by about 5:07, 1 and 4 spool up?? Just my ears or is that right? The amount of times i listen to this fantastic vid has to be illegal....
Do I hear the other engines spool up later or is that something else? 5:07
Yes, that is what you hear.
@@flymajj I'm afraid that my favorite aircraft, this IL-62, is not open for public anymore. Only governments operate it now.
Wow these are like a cooler version on an md80 like plane the il 62m flies lie a boss. I enjoyed it.
the il62m barely has enough lift to get off the ground😊
1:04 star engine
4:52 takeoff
4:54 Spooling up this 2 Engines
Сколько стран мира восхищается этим звуком советских двигателе приятно)
I once got to go on a fast taxi on a VC-10 and it seems very similar to the IL62
Me too, last year at Bruntingthorpe.
@@flymajj It was at bruntingthorpe for me as well
El sonido de las turbinas del il62 son únicas,no hay comparación me gusta escucharlo.gracias.
First Airliner I see climbing at 500fpm like a cessna 172
to give you a idea of how loud those engines are listen to the PA being drowned out during 1:30
Viva! D30KU sound! I often heared at RJNN.
amazing man, nice job !
The sweet sound of the D-30 engines.
Not d30 engines but kuznetsov nk8 engines
Super Amazing video!
Holy mackerel, the haze in the air from the smog....
Raphael Web Just like L.A.
+tchirn maybe LA 20 years ago.
Jeepers, what a racket huh? Do you get noise compensation for flying with this airline? I guess not much choice is available though.
AMAZING SOUND!!!
Them engines are really close to the window and the wings
This airplane was actually quite impressive. It has an incredible range for a plane from 1960! Over 5,000 miles with 200 passengers (give or take). It was, when first introduced, the largest jet airliner ever. The engines were a bit weak for such a large plane though... 107.9 kN (as compared to about 250 kN on most jets of the same size nowadays).
I think you are referring to no.2 and it is on. What you are seeing is not the fan.
One of the most reliable Soviet airplanes! It is a pity at us in Russia such don't fly any more, it is a pity ! Europe and the USA told us that our airplanes bad and our governors fools replaced them all with Boeings and Airbuses ! So that I envy you the Korean airlines ! :о)
To the author many thanks for video !!!
...
Один из самых надёжных советских самолётов ! Жаль у нас в России такие уже не летают, очень жаль ! Нам Европа и США сказали, что наши самолёты плохие и наши правители дураки заменили их все на Боинги и Эйрбасы ! Так, что я вам завидую Корейские авиалинии ! :)
Автору огромное спасибо за видео !!!
***** You have the Boeing 787 to compete with it.
***** Early versions of the IL-62 did have reliability issues with engines, but many issues were solved in the IL-62M. Between 1989 and 2009, no fatalities occurred despite the highest number of examples in service. The IL-62 also has a lower hull loss rate than either the Boeing 707 or the DC8. The airframe is also very strong, designed to survive an emergency landing with the gear up. The tradeoff of course is more weight. The IL-62M also has a 50-year service life rating, quieter and more reliable Soloviev D30-KU turbofans, and was regarded as a very comfortable aircraft, especially during turbulence, and well liked by pilots.
Those D-30s... 4:55 That's the sound you wanna hear.
ЗВУК ДВИГАТЕЛЕЙ ИЛ-62 НЕПОВТОРИМ !!!! СУПЕР.НАДЁЖНАЯ ТЕХНИКА !!!!
Ил-76, Ту-154М и А-40 с Вами поспорят ))
Great sound
Tuve el privilegio de volar en uno de estos aviones en 1992 por CUBANA. Ciertamente ese es el sonido!. Lo que nunca supe, era que fuese tan peligroso. Mi vuelo, en particular fue espectacular: Buenos Aires-La Habana. Bonitos recuerdos.
Just modify the engine location of each pair.place one from each pair above and behind the other two just below the drag so that the engines form an inclined upper half of hexagon ; the pair near the drag forming the upper two points of the inclined hexagon.
I hope they supply earplugs for the flight. Especially towards the back
Earplugs and rosary beads would be must-haves.
gcc geo these planes are in perfect condition but for some, earplugs may be necessary.
Aren’t those Tupolev Tu-154 engines?
Yes, IL-62M and Tu-154M have the same type of engines.
Soloviev D-30
Looking very similar to the original tail-mounted four-engined VC10, the IL-62 concept was drawn up in 1960, a few years after the design of the VC10 was agreed upon. The first VC10 flew in early 1962, and the first IL-62 in 1963. The engine noise on the IL-62 is very loud when compared to the VC10, which had a very pleasing engine idle note when taxiing.
I have heard many times that the IL-62 design was a logical step and had nothing to do with stolen designs, but then again so was the design of the TU-144 ('Concordski') and the Buran (space shuttle).
Isn’t the Il62 larger than the VC10?
ugh youd never catch me alive in that thing.. beautiful engine sound though
I'd go insane listening to that high pitched screeching for 2 hours.
*THE ENGINES ARE SCREAMING FOR HELP*
Please don't take us back to Kim
@@tomjordan378😂😂😂
Now this is a plane I'd love to fly on!
Careful what you wish for. That thing had a lot of crashes back in its early days. Now It's probably upgraded, and therefore a lot safer,but I still wouldn't want to fly on this plane.
An Ustian Citizen. I even would like to own those Russian planes tu-154, il-62 (that one in the video), il-76, and tu-134.
@@zygi22 The reason for those crashes was the lack of respect for safety in the USSR and how they covered up the causes of plane crashes. With the USSR dissolved, it's probably much more safer.
Я человек простой: вижу советский самолёт- ставлю лайк 👍
So , did you survive north korea ?
Of course.
We just love our junky IL-62. Great for emergency runs to the Booze-Hound. Smokes, leaks fuel, but gets a rise out of the neighbors.
I'm not sure which has a slower climb rate.... this model or the A340
Did you make it back?
Of course. All 3 times!
Alexander, the il62 is safer than the 737, 747, 727 and pretty much the whole boeing fleet. Just because its soviet doesn't mean it ain't safe
Yes, as per the description.
Wait ,Wait , I'm on the wrong plane !!!! That Cessna is the plane I'm supposed to be on HELLO !!!! OMG where these bargain seats , listen to that spool up whine !!! 20 min of that is enough to go insane let alone hours ... Its best to listen to this with good head phones and volume cranked up to get the true headache effect !!!!!
How did you get the Visa???????
Why was engine 3s blades weren't moving at that moment
they are fixed guide vanes, just like the Conways on a VC10.
Great sound!
Wow Ian! I envy you! My gosh!
I love it when the sound turna from a cheap hair dryer to an screaming eagle during take off run.
Which one is mine ??, the one with the wheels and all the noise. Gonna fire up the IL-62 and go to the Chilis.
When I hear D-30 is running I understand my soviet aviation still alive!
This is not d30 it's kuznetsov nk8
No NK-8 has totally different sound more like howling
@@anykeyson you are right, my bad
Engine D-30KP (Двигатель Д-30 КП)
Д-30КУ, КП на Ил-76.
id love to go on one of these
it that a new type of passeger plane beside boeing?
+Happy Tylerienmam Networks The Il-62 is around 50 years old. Not exactly new ;)
Marc Liljeqvist oh! i never heard of this plane lol! Just Boeing and Airbus And MD
Oh
My
God
Da quanto non vengono revisionati quei motori per avere quel rumore???
Nothing like going to a nice vacation spot in North Korea on one of the scariest planes around.
Said to the point. I have actually worked on those planes. I wrote extensive reply to Ferimarshani comment below, therefore will skip repeating the same here.
tchirn And what type of uniform would this American be wearing? :-)
With Kim Jongh-Un as a captain
The Ilyushin IL-62 was one of the most rugged planes built by the Soviet Union, comparable to the Douglas DC-9. Russian aircraft in general are primitive but built well. If we look at hull loss rate, both the DC-8 and the Boeing 707 are more dangerous than the IL-62M.
nigahiga6400 - but if you compare fatalities per hull-loss accidents, or fatalities divided by number of aircraft produced you find that an accident with a IL-62 is more likely to end in fatalities than either the 707 or the DC-10.
"Damn, that thing's loud!", as Stallone would have said.
Were you able to hear anything after that flight? :))
I need a hearing test after listening to those screaming engines.
Nice short takeoff roll, not even one engine exploded
What seat number was this?
28A I would imagine
空姐的声音还真好听（看见没有汉语评论老子就忍不住来一句）
Thanks for the comment. Yes, the cabin crew are always very professional on Air Koryo.
Ian M - flymajj you got a great grasp of Chinese language,How many times have you been to China
Макс Лю Sorry, I used Google Translate! I have been to China about 6 times.
Who needs Adele when you got four screaming machines behind the plane.
These old Soviet engines noisy but reliable, while the modern low-noise motors can get out of order at hit of volcanic dust, these old engines are less susceptible to dust.
Reliable? Actually the very contrary. Polish Airlines lost two planes and 260+ lives because of them. What is however outrageous about it, first Polish disaster happened in 1980, manufacturer did not corrected problems. Second (for the same reason) happened in 1987, yet again manufacturer actually denied the very existence of problems and did nothing. Third incident occurred in 1990 (again same reasons, thanks God happier end by pure luck), yet again manufacturer did nothing. Last known (to me) incident happened in 2008, which suggest manufacturer, despise full knowledge of critical life threatening deficiencies and huge loss of human life in past, actually NEVER corrected problems. Search TH-cam for “flight 5055” video, as well “IL-62 el Santo Domingo” (aftermath of successful emergency landing by Cuban Airlines in 2008, after engine explosion). Polish Aviation Magazine published in 80-ties article in which there is summary made by Polish government commission regarding engine’s deficiencies. Besides what commission found to be the be direct cause of disaster (which is explained very well in mentioned video of flight 5055), commission found numerous other scandalous deficiencies in manufacturing process and quality control, including and not limited to: nonmetallic pollution in engine’s shaft material, lack of any kind of finish beside rough one, etc etc. Some Russians, might try to tell you Il-62 safety statistics match western counterpart’s planes of same era and that all disasters are currently known, even impossible to hide. You have to understand however they just tell you what they hear in their TV and there is no country (maybe beside North Korea) on the face of planet, where population is more brain washed by aggressive psychological warfare type anti-western propaganda. This is not true. Soviets were renowned for not admitting their disasters and incidents. No one till this day knows for sure how many IL-62 had crashed and how many people lost their lives in them. Seek western newspaper old article (as for instance fire of IL-62 in Boston USA), which no official (Russian or other) statistic even mentions. Same goes to mentioned 1990 incident.
FlyerKBOS I also may collect statistics about the American aircraft accidents, catastrophe Polish IL-62, does not count, it is peculiar Poles with poor maintenance. They even managed on TU-154, destroy their government in place with the President. On a wider scale this aircraft was operated in the USSR, with the small percentage of accidents, Ilyushin aircraft is a symbol of reliability, and those accidents were caused by humans and not planes.
*****
"collect statistic about the American aircraft'? Have you even read my post? Why bother replying to something you not even reading? What point would have collecting American statistics if USSR's ones are falsified? What you want it to compare to? I happened to work on IL-62 in particular, in Polish Airlines for some years. Polish Airlines did not have facilities, expertise, but most important Russian permission (license) to service airplane's engines (which were cause of polish disasters), hence how could they have "poor maintenance"? Are you quoting some senseless Russian propaganda myths? How could they maintenance badly something they did not maintenance at all? Engines from planes were taken out in one piece, shipped to Russia (for maintenance and check up), from where they were coming back with certificates allowing it to be operated by such and such number of hours. If you interested in subject, search YT for "Black Serial, Kabaty" to find account of Polish side, how Russians really were trying to bully out and deny their fault in Polish disasters. For years, contrary to polish government commission findings, they were claiming engines destruction were result of plane crash not it cause, despise fact that part of engines were recovered over 200 km from a disaster site (over area where engines exploded and plane started to experiencing an emergency). They could not deny their fault any more, once 3 years after disasters identical plane managed to safely land after another yet engine explosion. Torn apart engine was simply constituting undeniable evidence. They could not say anymore its damage was result of crash, as plane never crashed. Polish TU-154 which crashed, is believed by large percentage of polish population to be result of an assassination plot, while by official Russian version it is result of pilot error. No poor maintenance were even ever alleged by anyone. Check your sources. Quote: "On a wider scale this aircraft was operated in the USSR, with the small percentage of accidents.." Entire point of end of my post is - what percentage of planes operated in USSR (but even in entire Warsaw Pact block, to some degree) had crashed or had incidents is unknown as provided by USSR (AND some Warsaw Pact countries at some times) statistics are falsified. Also Polish communist government, was trying to hide some disasters in early decades after WW2. Some time after Stalin death, USSR grip on Poland eased and in result this practice was eventually abandoned. If you really feel you know what you talking about, and the plane is safe, why not take a flight on it and post as video from it on YT? I know personally more than few pilots who flew it 20+ years and are scare of flying it. After working on it and knowing Russian practices, I'm scare of flying it, yet in reality, its hard to imagine any circumstance any of us would need to fly Il-62 ever again. Writing all this might be only out of regard of lives of people in countries which still operates the IL-62. But heck, maybe you're just better expert or hero than all of us! Believe what pleases you and happy flying!
FlyerKBOS You have written a lot of, I don't have time to argue with stubborn American. If you think you live in the most fair and democratic country in the world, you are deeply mistaken, you lied always, and not less than Councils. Although I'm not a big expert on aviation, but I must say that the reliability of Russian aircraft is not inferior to Western, and your examples of problems with the Il-62 just a trifle on the background of long-term operation of this aircraft. As for the Polish Tu-154, on Board was Kaczynski, explicit Russophobe and a falsifier of history
by the case of Katyn, whether it was a terrorist attack do not know, God punished him.
*****
Kaczynski - despise his deficiencies and controversies, recognized even in Poland, was not trying to falsify history about Katyn, to contrary, was trying not to allow it to be falsified by Putin, quite possibly, that's why he was murdered too. To remind, till Jelcyn, USSR and Russia was lying about its involvement there. Even Russia eventually admitted guilt, Putin, former KGB officer, (formerly know as NKVD - which did murdering in Katyn), denied NKVD officers should be treated as criminals or have even their veteran benefits taken away. This show where his real loyalties lay - to former NKVD butchers, his buddies. Showing his ugly face in Katyn with flowers, where he was bubbling hypocritically how bad communist was (as if he was not the core communist himself) and how terrible the crime was (while granting at the same time rewards to murders), was as much tactful, as visit of Gestapo officer in Auschwitz. Stubborn American? Maybe its not me who is stubborn American but you who are stubborn Ruskie? Which is the true?
Why is this engine screaming
I thougt four engines are only on the wings (not on the back)
It was a design during that era also used by the VC-10.It was pretty old and isn't used a lot.
VC 10 now theres a aircraft for noise,4 conway engines coming through your speakers
This is the vickers VC- 10 but louder
Ilyushin IL-62 Is The Russian Vickers VC-10
Glorious!!!!
Love this plane
No offense to that IL-62, but I can already hear the engines explode.
Air Koryo of North Korea can land any Russian Built Aircraft like the Ilyushin 62M as seen to any Airports Including Singapore.
Singapore Changi Airport Terminals Can handle these Aircraft.