Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom: An Unbridled Rage
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ย. 2024
- So, the original video got claimed by Universal and I tried several times to correct it to their specifications but now its just a wide claim across the whole video.
I have removed any and all footage that isn't covered by fair use and if they claim it again, I will be taking the appeal process as far as I can.
This rage is about the new Jurassic film and my goodness the script was awful. Though, from the trailer, did you expect anything else?
I suppose at this point I should define this series of mine and I would personally call it a biased assessment of a film with the goal of entertaining through comedy and information.
And here is a link to Wolf's video:
• Video
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 80 | คู่เอก "รักษ์ vs ยอดนำชัย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ckLMRorsMeY/mqdefault.jpg)
Honestly, Jeff Goldblum got the best deal in this film. Show up, do your few minutes worth of scenes, collect paycheck, go home.
He was in this?
I wonder how much he was payed?
Probably more than half the cast.
It wasn't even really a few min iirc
Jeff who now, oh yeah from JP 1 and 2 and Independence Day.
At least he didn't look like a total tit in this one
Volcanic Ash is 1000 degrees and he runs through that shit, he's sure not the son of a celestial in only 1 franchise
Yup pyroclastic flows are not fun.
sulijoo Pompeii civilians can agree
He's always sweating bullets, and this is why. It's a heightened form of meditation that places him in an everlasting trance of sweating his ass cheeks off, giving him an effective layer of protection against all forms of heat. It's like the Flash Sweat spell from Dark Souls.
A wave of invisible noxious toxic gas would sweep over and suffocate him long before any pyroclastic flow came near so it's double B.S.
@@sulijoo that's the word
“We shouldn’t allow our children to grow up in a world without dinosaurs”. Just... let that sink in. The writers made that, the director approved that, they left that in...
It is pretty incredible, in the worst way. Our children need these bloodthirsty animals in the world... even though no homosapien had dinosaurs in their world in history and they got along just fine(more or mess)
I agree with them, fuck children!
Nellenara yeah there the hole reason we have TH-cam screwed up right now
Triceratops Horridus1021 *whole
Let's not forget the worst part:
The main characters were actually hesitant about releasing the dinosaurs so they had that clone girl release them on the ground that she's a clone too and they have just as much of a right to live as her.
The writers of this movie actually managed to weaponise political correctness in the form of a tactical nuke...
Attempting a blood transfusion between a Tyrannosaurus and a Velociraptor is like attempting a blood transfusion between a human and a baboon. It is simply absurd.
trex & raptors share 1 thing in common. Neither of them ever existed.
@@mstrikesback168 .....they did
@@mstrikesback168 What... do you mean?
@@milobrown5941 the raptor and rex in Jurassic Park weren't real-life dinosaurs. Actual velociraptors were turkey-sized and had feathers. The "velociraptors" in the film were based off another dino called Deinonychus whose main distingushing feature were the large claws on their feet hence their name's literal translation "terrible claw". As for the rex, the idea that it can't see motion isn't remotely real.
@@nathanielartosilla9110 I...don't feel like thats what MSB meant
CGI is the most awesome force Hollywood has ever seen, but you wield it like a kid that's found his dad's gun..
Hollywood... uh...finds a way.
Every time someone mentions Hollywood CGI I think back to that one God awful looking black panther fight scene.
There is a lot of god awful CGI these days. A lot of it looks bad just because the scenes it's used to create are completely fucking absurd.
Well there it is....
God damnit you are absolutely correct. The fast camera shit is annoying too. Look at the original JP and how it gave you damn near everything you could ask for when it comes to dinosaur scenes. Imagine the final scene of that movie if they had used modern day fast camera movement bullshit or if they did fast camera angle bullshit on the T-rex escape scene. I am utterly disappointed with this film and the previous one big time. For me it is childhood ruining.
"These animals would replace thousands of troops on the ground."
Blue, considered to be an apex predator, goes down with one flimsy bullet. Yeah, I'm not seeing it.
Then you have the Indominus in the first movie being apparently bulletproof since the soldiers open fire and their bullets do absolutely nothing
Well owen used his pathetic rifle and the mini gun missed all of its shots, the ACU team used non lethals. The indominus wouldnt even be able to survive against ww2 weaponry
@@dylancross1039 They were using non lethals I believe. A tank or a good rocket could at least take that thing out.
Well. They wouldn’t be used as armor units, but as stealth units in very specific situations. Yeah its definitely stupid, but in specific situations they could be an incredibly effective surgical tool. Such as hunting down targets or escapees, assassination attempts or ambushes. As for the bullets, the strike team would also have been equipped with significantly larger rounds than the average soldier would have. They also could presumably be fitted with ballistic plating. I know im making a stupid defense for a stupid decision, but it does have a potential use haha.
@@darthvader6533 By strike team you mean the ones in the movie? The pistol that Blue was shot with was a simple Sig 9mm. 9mm is a very small round that actually has decent penetration (for a handgun anyway) because it's small size allows for greater speed than the larger 45 ACP (the other common hand gun ammo). But in terms of overall damage that it can cause 9mm is still nothing compared to most rifle and shotgun rounds.
"Stop punishing me for thinking" - Mauler 2018
I actually scrolled down and read this comment 1 single second before he said it
That the Jurassic world franchise for ya
I thought he was chinese? Mau Ler?
Priceless.
Big Brother: How about no
That volcanic smoke is a pyroclastic flow, should be moving at several hundred miles an hour, and would instantly turn Starlord's lungs into glass. It would 100% kill him instantly.
Who cares about scientific accuracy, just shut up and watch the dinosaurs act super cool!- Jurassic World fans
Yeah but what if he held his breath checkmate
@@jeremyallen492 Your favorite scene was the one where the Dino took a lava bath huh?
@@LoganVang1356 hold his breath? How is one supposed to "hold their breath" when their body has just been engulfed by a massive wave of heat, pressure and ash?
@@LoganVang1356 I mean yea that could work for for a second but cardio takes a lot of oxygen for your body to use so if you think holding your breath still is hard imagine doing that while running so just a couple inhales from poisonous lava smoke and he’d prolly be a goner
Sequel writing 101: the protagonist couple that formed in the first one has fallen apart between films, justification not essential.
What is up with that it's so fucking jarring when your re watching
That's actually one of my biggest pet peeves in writing, constantly re-treading the same ground rather than allowing relationships to evolve.
Hollywood doesn't understand healthy long-term relationships. That's why actors keep getting divorced every couple years.
@@cashmancool2879 They do that so they can lazily recreate the same dynamic from the first time they met in the previous film. That's it. Hollywood producers and script writers saw people liked their bickering opposites gimmick and thought ''well, let's just do that again, even if it makes no sense''. They straight up don't care.
Sometimes I think it's because the love interests actor refused to do the sequel for whatever reason, and they have to write around that. In which case it would be better to recast the character but people don't like that either. In the case of Gwyneth Paltrow in the Avengers, I find it fascinating that one person didn't wanna be there, so the plot had to massively derail for Tony and Pepper (post iron man 3) having them separated, then magically getting married in the next one, but having the plot basically wrapped around Tony being sad after a breakup, was pretty stupid for a huge franchise like that. But also, yeah they don't know how to write relationships longer than 6 months in Hollywood because they are completely removed from reality.
Friendly reminder that the writers for this mess are also working on the Rise of Skywalker
Well the video about it should be good at least
That explains why I feel the same after watching this as I did watching Rise of Skywalker haha
It shows.
It definitely shows xD
Their film schools should all be disaccredited, jesus christ. Not writing anything makes you better at writing than these people.
Why on earth would make it so a set of doors require a constant, unbroken online connection to continue performing a task as basic as 'closing'?
...okay, new theory: the lagoon doors were manufactured by EA.
Always online gaming
It'll be $5 to upgrade your signal
@@talont9934 if you give us $15 we'll give you faster doors.
nigga its a movie that why, I mean u do know its not possible to clone dinosaurs right ?
Ja'Len Fulp Wow, I rarely meet people who can turn their brain off to watch a movie. I guess we are stupid to think and expect quality. I mean it’s not like it’s their jobs and they want our money.
This whole series is based on the toxic relationship of the two main characters, Star-Lord and Heels. They get off on dinosaur disasters and get bored with each other when there is no disaster to excite them. So, my theory is that they are actually causing these situations in an auto-erotic fashion.
Haha true. Makes sense.
My new head canon
I knew I wasn’t the only one thinking this!
Fucking legend lol
So Like some sort of auto-erotica?
The worst part was when they were auctioning the damn dinosaurs. They're extinct, can we please charge billions!!!!? Twenty million couldn't even cover the light bill for the damn mansion!!
LOL, when the little girl went back to her room with all the lights already turned on I couldn't help but think "damn, those people are rich"
@@glurp1er buying Messi - 200 millions
buying T-rex - 18 Millions
Hell, some terrible actors make that in a year 🙃😂🙃
Dr. Evil without the satire. Seriously though, a fossil of TRex has sold for $31 million. 😂
These people have never heard of supply and demand and how limited supply affects price
I just still can't get over the fact they built their multi billion dollar dinosaur park on an Island with known active volcano.
@HS Melvin Lopez I don't think that applies when moving Dinosaurs honestly. Could maybe have something to do with the energy solution for where it is but still seems very silly.
I think in the novel they actually explain why they did that. Something about the vents surrounding the volcano being able to produce an environment and atmosphere similar to what dinosaurs lived in.
It's been a minute since I've read the novel though, so I might be wrong.
Yeah there's like 5 other islands near isla nublar.
@@The_Real_Frisbee Yes, correct. I'm re-reading the book and yup, that's why they built there.
@Melvin Gravediggerz99 I doubt that considering they were stupid enough to build doors that close after a timer has finished which starts when a button is pressed. Also it would destroy all equipment on the island which is a huge amount of money. Also there are other islands that don't have active volcanoes, such as site B
Animals the guy mentioned that is used for warfare:
Horse
Elephants
Diseased Rats
But didn’t mention DOGS.
Yeah right, did they just forget one the first ever human cooperation with another species?
To be fair, John wick 3 wasn't out yet.
Even then our dogos in uniform are used for sniffing out weapons, drugs and finding people, but even in the case of finding someone it's to capture them. Mean while a velocaraptor would have them torn into chilli meat, provided they could even be domesticated like mans best friend.
Do you mean how Romans would set pigs on fire and send them running towards enemy elephant to scare them?
@@cassiusemmanualtheyoutubep3171
That's fucked up... and hilarious!
Fun fact: the original book ended with the military bombing the island and killing all the dinosaurs. So even in the book dinosaurs suck ass when put up against human military forces. All that speed and ferocity can't save you from a carpet bombing.
Nope. Books ends with military bombing the ISLAND and there's small matter of velociraptors that almos reached shore on fodder supply ship - reportedly crew got them ALL. Killing dinosaurs on island is heavily IMPLIED. Also book already STARTS with Procompognathus already attacking little girl OUSTIDE ISLA NUBLAR, on mainland Costarica.
Yeah, the movies have taken away so much of the message of the book in the pursuit of money.
@@HappyBeezerStudios And the pursuit of the dumbass idea of weaponized dinosaurs. Which they NEVER gave up on. Even in the third one.
@@ThomasKral5 wait, the producers of the movies are working on actual military usage of actual dinosaurs?
But the book also implied that some dinosaurs, specifically veloceraptors and compsognathus had already escaped the island before the military bombed it. And in the case of compsognathus even before Dr. Grant and the others ever set foot on the island.
That whole "Having characters act as though they are watching the movie and know what the audience knows" thing seems to be depressingly common nowadays. The whole concept of dramatic irony died around the same time as good writing
saying good writing doesn't exist anymore is just fucking retarded.
Its just bad and lazy writing, thing is not everyone would pick up on it so bad writers can get away with it.
Unless you break the 4th wall like Spaceballs (where Dark Helmet and Colonel Sandurz watch the movie on video to find out where the heroes are at that moment.) ;-)
Hollywood was so preoccupied with how much money they would make, they didn't stop to think if they should. - Dr. Ian Malcolm
Ian Malcolm is a massive pseudo intellectual and so are all the dorks who try to imitate him.
@@neo-filthyfrank1347 k
@@watermelonjuice8524 Trying to be snarky and beta about it doesn't make it untrue.
I'll tell you the problem with Jurassic World: it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step. You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could and before you even knew what you had you patented it and packaged it and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now you're selling it, you want to sell it!
I hate Malcom still being right all the time even after nearly 30 years (gosh is that how old the franchise is?!?!)
@@neo-filthyfrank1347 おちんちん
At this point, the 3rd Jurassic World movie needs to abandon all attempts to make sense, and just go insane. Maybe a scientist figures out how to switch minds with a dinosaur, and the film ends with our heroes in the bodies of raptors fighting a genetically engineered dragon with the mind of our villain.
@Jerry Graham
...? I'm confused. Could you elaborate?
@Jerry Graham how does starlord survive being enfulfed by a pyroclastic flow?
@Jerry Graham taser go up to 50 000 volts and most importantly he wasnt anchore ti anything but the fence allowung the current to run through him without causing to much damage.
Still this can easily be considere a flaw.
On the kitchen scene, yeah they avoid the raptors attacks, this Tim getting chomped on by a raptor and not sufdering any wounds.
On the rule of cool...meh thats so personal, i was just taken out of the movie by this absurdity and the "cool"factor didn't even register.
As for the it isnt a pyroclastic flow but simply volcanic ash, heres national geographics definition of pyroclastic flow:
Pyroclastic Flow
A pyroclastic flow is a dense, fast-moving flow of solidified lava pieces, volcanic ash, and hot gases. It is extremely dangerous to any living thing in its path.
Sounds kinda similar to volcanic ash that hasn't settled yet
@Jerry Graham sure if one debatable point is enough to shrug of any and all absurdities thats fine.
I just find the movie absolutely dumb with dokrs requiring constant connections, the clone girls releasing all dinosaurs cause their clones too, the characters having all the knowledge we have(they know about the auction despite not havinh any source of it) etc. etc.
@Jerry Graham how about the others i just brought up? How about the fact the evil people have enough acces to open the mosasaurus pen but not enough to access the tracking systems?
Why didnt dollar store hammondknow about thing sgoing on in his own house?
Why does T-Rex blood help a raptor?
Why does no one care that the Rex is thrashing around, it probably tge most dangerous thing aboard and no one is guarding it?
Why were they evacuating the island while it blows up, they knew it was gonna blow up well in advance.
This type of stuf is throughout the movie.
First movie: innocent people gets killed by dinosaurs showing how dangerous is to bring back to life extinted species
Sequels: Nah, those people were mean/evil so they deserve to be killed by dinosaurs
Tell that to Eddie
@@senabecool7232 He might've left a toilet seat up one time or something, karma I guess
@@bluemutt9964
That monster bet he even used up all the toilet paper and didnt replace it as well
This guy never read the book
EVERYONE KNOWS TOURISTS ARE THE DEALIEST THREAT TO THE GOODNESS OF HUMANITY OBVIOUSLY /s
When you called her "Heels" it made me realise... her entire character is being a redhead with a bob wearing heels.
Well, the glasses black hair girl made my pipi hard because she is like MK, so...
*_Pp hard._*
@Nicolas Oliveira
Redhead mommy > glasses black hair girl
Objective truth.
@@ano_nym Alabama is the other way friend
@Nicolas Oliveira
"mommy" =/= mom.
The fact that he can't remember her name, bases her nickname on a ridiculous part of her character, and the very next frame shows her characters name. Killed me.
Fun fact, national geographic states a t-rex's top speed is 12mph, any faster and its bones would shatter, meanwhile the fastest speed while running in high heels was 15.4 mph, meaning that outrunning a t-rex in high heels is one hundred percent possible. It just looks impossible because in the movies they make it seem like the t-rex can run as fast as cars, even outrunning them, whilst in reality the t-rex wouldn't even be able to stay close to an escaping vehicle.
@@redrangerrr558 text is over 20 canonically she's an old queen
@@redrangerrr558 There’s a lecture by David Hone, who’s a leading tyrannosaurus expert, here on TH-cam. He goes into foot anatomy of T-rex being adapted for high speed and long distance and specifically says “you couldn’t outrun a T-rex”, not even dare think of it. Hard to estimate, but speeds more akin to that of an olympic sprinter and also able to maintain that speed for a long time. It’s a great lecture, I recommend you check it out.
@@manlymcmanface9932 will do, I'm curious as to whether or not you could outrun a t-rex.
@@redrangerrr558 But they established in the first film that their T-Rex can run 32mph.
"Children get amazed by car keys we don't need dinosaurs for f*** sake" made me laugh.
I was under the impression that the "smoke" storming down from the volcano usually reached some hundred degrees. I was wrong.
"Pyroclastic flows are the most deadly of all volcanic hazards", and can reach 1000°C. Imagine if the writers ever used Google, like I just did.
So yeah, Starlord didn't make it, it was all just a fever dream of Heel's.
Not to mention there’s no way to outrun it. Only way you could is if you had your car drive at 240km an hour
@@John-xr9ry We don't have cars that move so fast on a terrain like that 😂😂
Only a jet can outrun such a hazard
@@John-xr9ry Where's a bugatti veyron when you need one? Lol
@@Darkstar_Dayne I think a veyron could do it. And a chiron. But that's semantics I guess
It would have killed all of them so fast that their brains wouldn't even have time to process the pain of their entire bodies being glassed in an instant.
I was genuinely enraged by the end of the movie, with the girl releasing all the dinosaurs. I did my best to suspend my disbelief for the rest of this movie, but that ending broke me.
Same, here. It immediately puts so many people in danger. Tigers are my favorite animal. They're beautiful and if I could interact with them with no chance of being hurt, I would be on cloud nine. But, that isn't reality. I could raise a tiger cub and bond with it and maybe that tiger could love me but a fully grown carnivore doesn't have to hate you or be hungry to kill or hurt you. It could do so just trying to play because tigers are much more powerful and unpredictable than human beings. Now, imagine a little boy playing in his back yard. His dog starts to bark in terror. The boy turns around to face the tree line and there's a velociraptor. The dog either runs in fear or charges it trying to protect the child he loves and is soon very much dead. The boy is frozen in place in terrible fear as the raptor approaches. His mother heard their dog going nuts and walks to their back porch just in time to watch her little son become lunch and there is absolutely nothing she can do about it. Maisie may have been a naive child, but she just sentenced people to death. I actually love Blue, but the ending wasn't heart warming for me, it was an avoidable disaster.
@@darianrose2195 Agreed. About the only silver lining from this mess of a movie ending would be if the 3rd movie would be, like, the dinosaurs took over the continent and caused an apocalypse because I think there hadn't been any dinosaur-caused apocalypses in movies and it's a very cool idea. However, considering that they played the girl releasing the dinosaurs as a good thing, I somehow doubt they would go with that.
@@catxborsuq1 I doubt that, too, but they should!
The worst part is that she was shown as somewhat competent for the majority of the time of facing against the antagonists, and literally the only experience she had with her fellow clones was nothing but fear of being eaten. Then the indoraptor is bursts outside onto the roof, and she suddenly becomes the dumbest character.
I came out of the theater thinking, the only way they can make the 3red movie good is if they just go completely off the rails and make it an ridiculous action movie. With like the good guys having all the good dinosaurs and the bad guys having all the hybrid dinosaurs, and it just being an outright war. Like Avengers Endgame but with dinosaurs. I would respect that.
Jeff’s promo kills me 😂
He knew he was gonna be in this for about a minute and a half.
Money will find a way 😉
Its such a "yup this is happening" moment
If i remember correctly he didn't want to be in this movie but was essentially blackmailed into an appearance and the promotional material.
@@tranquilthoughts7233 how?
@@starlight0313
Have you ever read the kinds of contracts that actors have to sign? Sometimes they literally force you to work for them as long as the franchise exists.
Atleast that's what I'm guessing happened.
Scientifically spoken, the volcanic smoke is around 600 - 1000 °C hot if I member correctly, so Starlord could in no way survive. Guess plot armor comes with a built in heat shield in 2k18
The combination of chemicals that are combined in a volcano also produce an extremely toxic gas which tends to be spread throughout the ash cloud. So even if he survived the heat the gas would kill him.
You don't need to get near that temperature to kill everything either. Pompeii's fourth surge(aka the most fatal surge) was only 300C(570F), and it fried all the remaining living things to a crisp.
But... he's starlord...
The indoraptor is not only stupid, it is also sick. When they were hiding below that triceratops' skull, they were literally under the indoraptor's nose. I'm not kidding. It was just above the characters, sniffing the air. And it coldn't smell their sweatty asses. Maybe if got a flu and clogged nostril from being in the rain
Any spooky factor it might have had died completely when it sneakily smiled for the camera while setting up its little trap in the cage
*_Money & War!_*
Yeah. Recreating these things, to *_Sell on the Black Market,_* to *_Use as "WeApOnS" in war!!_*
*_F*CK OFF, YOU UNEDUCATED, UNDERNOURISHED, UNDERACHIEVING UNDERLINGS!!!!_*
You know, its' a year late, but the 'Shit in a war' bit brings to mind the Soviet Bomb Dogs. They trained dogs to run under tanks with AT mines strapped to them. They trained them under Soviet tanks, not German tanks. It went about as well as expected.
Not just that. Because of the sounds of gunshots and shock from explosions they usually ran back to the Soviets because they got scared......
Yep
Even in medieval warfare dinosaurs wouldn't be of much use in modern warfare they are useless a few bullets and they are down
@@ripvanwinkle7689 I bet you would watch THAT film though.
🤣😝
@@Mecharnie_Dobbs no because it would make no sense
Pokemon did a better "clone empathizes with fellow clones" plot line.
Bruuuuther my bruuuthher 💕
If the little girl was the reason Hammond quit working with the new Hammond , wouldn't that girl clone be as old as the first movie ? She should be like 20 some odd years old
Fuck you and how god damned right you are.
@@jerff5411 Unless he cloned her like a bunch of times.
@@darksev.6468 Makes Wolfs Interpretation a whole lot more reasonable
I love how that tranq dart keeps Blue asleep for hours but Starlord wakes up in 10 minutes and he’s about a ton less weight. Lucky he’s a Ketamine junkie and has a elephant sized tolerance to tranqs with all that lava coming.
Should've made a tranq that works on creatures with 5 fingers...
@@whiskeyhound LMAO, that was funny, but I feel physical pain anytime I am reminded of the fact that that godawful, stupid motherfucking finger bit was allowed to be a thing...
Apparently biology girl pulled out the dart before it injected too much serum into him. idk if thats possible, but thats what happened. I dont think thats possible tho...
@@SocraticEngineer I'd say you could do it, but you'd have to rip it out within maybe 2-5 seconds of it going in, which I doubt the movie actually had her do that.
@@whiskeyhound I'll rewatch the movie. Bcz I like dinosaurs I won't have a problem with that lol
I legitimately thought 'tech guy's' screaming was a dinosaur's mating call.
It explains why they're drawn to him.
See, that could've been fun. Have him scream, then let someone tell him that the way it sounds it will only attract the dinos.
@veritusahriman9720 🤣 lol
Imagine having a gun with a laserpointer, that requires a trained Indo Raptor to be nearby to attack your mark, instead of just pulling the trigger on the gun to fire bullets at your mark. Was this some 300 iq plan B solution for when you run out of ammo before all enemies are dead?
How about lighting up the inside of a building? The dino goes inside, mauls everything and you didn't have to give away your position. Though a grenade would do the trick, I suppose.
I mean, the psychological impact you would have on your enemies of knowing dinosaurs would be coming to disembowel you would be pretty terrifying.. them again, a drone with hellfire missiles is just as scary
This. If you can put a laser point on your target, just use BULLETS. Dinosaurs need to fed, sheltered, kept healthy and and prevented from killing their keepers. You can keep bullets in a BOX.
@Shirou Emiya, Shitlord of Justice Wow what a word salad of a dumb shit reply. Thanks, screen shotting this for future lolz.
@Shirou Emiya, Shitlord of Justice So you're a right winger? You can't live with logic. You pray to a space wizard that doesn't exist.....LOL.....
You're a better CinemaSins than CinemaSins.
not a high bar cinema sins is fucking atrocious
*ding
@@jamesduffy7549 especially since they just point out for every bullshit just to get a ding.
@Robin Banks he also criticizes things genuinely with no actual good points but then defends himself by saying he's "just bring funny"
@Robin Banks I actually agree with you. They are just to dry and try to hard to be funny. Coming from this guy, it actually sounds more natural and not as forced.
It bothered me that the movie sort of assumed that I was on board with saving the dinosaurs when they didn’t convince me at all that they should be saved
Will_ Brunet if anything, this movie convinced me of the opposite, since humans clearly don’t understand how to run a fucking zoo.
Will_ Brunet
Well they are simply animals, and to subject them to a horrible death by volcano is simply cruel. Saving the dinosaurs and putting them on a random island(which was the original plan), would’ve been better.
Tanner Lawley and then what? All the dinosaurs would overpopulate the island and they would die out anyways.
Antonio Sonntag
No they wouldn’t, we’ve seen them striving for 30 years
Main Problem with that is the cloning, they can't go extinct you can just make more any time
That whole “They would be shit in a war” tangent had me dying lol.
@FATEd Pondera I guess robots are easier to pilot, no need to be fed, and have no risk to attack their own creators? What robots do are up to the pilots?
@FATEd Pondera a giant robot can be armed with massive guns, controlled by a computer, heavily armored and resistant to damage, and usually represents a stagnation in technology in the media they are portrayed within like with battletech. Dinosaurs are uncontrollable animals made of meat and only work in absolute fantasy. Even fiction needs to obey rules and make sense in it's own bubble.
@ZeraSeraphim I think that's only when AI were involved. Pacific Rim's Jaegers were all controlled by people and in the sequel indirectly by kaijus. And that was because of people too
If the robots were man-controlled, you only need to worry about the pilot, which is much easier to deal with I think
@@aryshandono3249
"Westworld"
@@aryshandono3249 Also robots can be built on assembly lines, whereas animals need to be raised and cared for to maturity. Robots can be infinite, living things are always finite and much more fragile. Animals also need to be trained, while robots obviously don't. A machine that's been damaged can be repaired, an animal that's been killed can't just be given life again. There's so much that's stupid about what @ZeraSeraphim said.
"The first one made sense"
Jurassic Park made so much sense that people were legit asking scientists at the time "can we actually do this and if not why not?"
I think he means plot wise. Like it was easy to understand.
@@Frankurino and made sense with it's own history and lore
It's true, the science in the first one is actually believable.
@@theonionsystem7779 and the direction and writing are good
@@MigWith I thought the lost world and JP3 were good but that’s just my opinion
Freedom or chasing a little girl?
Normal Dino: freedom
Yellow: N IS FOR NO SURVIVORS
@Jerry Graham It does a little trolling
@Jerry Graham and its targets are everything that moves, shit in a war
you forgot the part where he used a pistol to shoot a hole in the gyrosphere, completely forgetting that in the first Jurassic World they explained the glass of those spheres could repel a 50. caliber round.
Why? Are you calling that a plot hole? Cause it's not. It's a nod to the original movie and novel in which Hammond constantly proclaims "No expenses spared!" while on the same time cutting every possible corner to actually spare money, meaning it's all for the aw effect.
KTK They literally demonstrate it resisting a bullet in the movie.
@@fledbeast5783 Its sarcasm.
the sad part is .50 BMG is not even considered an anti-personnel round, its a fucking anti-material round, but pussy pistols that are ineffective at being firearms and only exist for compact carry? OP plz nerf
Ty Connor aww it’s been in an open field for three years fully exposed to the elements so it’s likely the sphere wasn’t quit as durable.
You know, in the book the Costa Rican government napalmed the island at the end just to be safe
It's why there had to be a second island in the sequel
Too bad the movies never did this
But the book also implied that some dinosaurs managed to escape the island. Specifically compsognathus escaped even before Dr. Grant and the others ever set foot on the island and some veloceraptors too seem to have escaped at some unknown point in time.
@@tranquilthoughts7233 Thing is even if say a dozen escaped thats not nearly a large enough viable breeding pool to repopulate a species
@@DeaconPain While the number of dinosaurs that escaped is never specified, you are probably right that it's not enough of a breeding pool. At least for the raptors. The compsognathus on the other hand... They are small enough to stow away in huge numbers and if i remember correctly in the attack on the child at the beginning of the movie alone there were dozens of compsognathus involved and there were further dozens of instances described or mentioned where compsognathus were probably involved. So for them the breeding pool might just be big enough.
The problem is probbaly more that the dinosaurs are all essentially clones and that of course dramatically reduces genetic diversity. If memory serves me right the compsognathus pattern they used was only at version three so there was at most three different clones running around, not accounting for the natural amount of mutations from a natural birth.
@@tranquilthoughts7233the book pretty clearly states that numerous dinosaurs escaped. The closing scene is the researcher interviewing Grant and telling him how there have been sightings of unknown species which have been eating crops rich in lysine, which the engineered dinos need to survive as one of the control methods they were engineered with, and apparently migrating directly north by the patterns of encounters. I always took that to mean some of the larger herbivores, although he also mentions chickens bring eaten. But it would have to be a pretty large pack of compys to eat crops to the extent that the damage is noticed and even reported. And I didn't see them eating soybeans. The second book talks about sightings of large animals, iirc, showing up mysteriously in the forests. The implication is that significant numbers of an undetermined number of species escaped during the time that they didn't understand the island was not actually under control, or from Site B.
As for sustainable populations, we don't know how many there are, they have brought back almost extinct populations from just a few animals before, and we already established that the DNA they were created with had unpredictable side effects such as allowing them to change sex. So perhaps they are also able to manifest genetic variance enough to sustain breeding. They have no natural predators, and as long as the numbers and breeding habits can beat natural mortality rate, the population not being "sustainable" in the long run doesn't necessarily mean that they won't survive for several generations. And the larger ones live a long time. And the longer they survive the more time there is for natural genetic variance to establish mutations and avoid crippling inbreeding issues in the gene pool.
@@tranquilthoughts7233but they don't know how many variants there are. They also didn't expect them to be able to change sex, and after they begin interbreeding, which they didn't think they could do at all, that creates whole new combinations of genes.
Old Jurassic Park movies: you cannot control the nature no matter how hard you try
Nu-Jurassic Park movies; capitalism bad, mkay?
It would surprise you to know that the original novels were basically "capitalism is bad" too. John Hammond was an asshole who was only interested in money and would rather his employees get killed than his "expensive animals". He also gave zero shits about his grandsons. And of course he gets eaten by one of his "expensive animals", fittingly enough.
@@LeonGun8 I think it's overshadowed by the can't control mother nature message
Lmao, you mean like the books?
Oh never mind, someone already said that.
"Capitalism bad, mkay?" ... "Thanks for buying a movie-ticket, we'll see you again next sequel"
A 9 year old girl just progressed future human massacres all over the U.S and there was uplifting music being played... Yeahhhhhhhhhhhh
Jamal 4K I hate the ending so god damn much
At best there were maybe 20 dinos in that room. Totally going to end the human race
Jamal 4K you seriously think that few dinosaurs could make a massacre, they’ll probably be immediately tracked down and given to who bought them if they’re still alive, or killed by hunters
She only opened it for about 17 dinosaurs. What comes after that leads to a massacre will be done by people who will abuse the genes of the captured dinosaurs. So it's not her mistake entirely in the end but her decision kinda leads to it.
Jurassic Park has a history of playing uplifting music in dangerous situations since the first. I'm glad she did that, however emotionally driven and warned against it was. I look forward to seeing how humans will face an actual Jurassic World.
If Dinosaurs can be used in the military then why isn't the military using Lions and tigers now?
Mario riestra vila
Ahhhhh no. You are thinking of Showgirls Starring Elizabeth Berkley
or bears...oh my.
Or those big hoofed things that run really fast.. uuhm.... HORSES. That's it. Why doesn't the military use those?
because there is no practical aplication for such animals in special operations
Lions and Tigers are well known pacifists. They don't support the war at all
The opening message to "that one guy who works at Universal" made me laugh so hard. I immediately had to watch it again.
17:30 Pyroclastic gas- The stuff he was consumed by- Is so hot that all the fluids in his body should have boiled instantly, the built up internal pressure of which would have caused him to explode. He would have been dead before he could even feel the heat.
Dr Bright Jesus Christ.... what a way to go out
Guess he should've went out in a boom ay ?-
@@raFael-ge6ge at least it would've been quick
Isn't he like ex-Special Forces or some shit.? I mean, _really_ tough guy. People can do some amazing things. I mean, Palpatine was thrown down a mile-deep shaft, then blown up, the blown to atoms, in the vacuum of space, millions of miles from any planetary atmosphere. And he "escaped" from that, yo.
So let's not underestimate....
...the stupidity of Hollywood scriptwriting.
@Isle OfDonSpuart im assuming thats a joke and not a very good one at that
Supposedly the writers of this film are also responsible for _Star Wars: The Rise Of The Skywalker._ And let me tell you, it’s showing.
Colin trevorrow was supposed to write and direct but was let go due to the dismal reviews of book of Henry. Chris Terrio who wrote batman v superman wrote the script for ros.
And they’re also responsible for Batman vs Superman. It all makes sense now.
quarantine got us watching old reviews
@@Aredel I know its naive to think people in Hollywood work in a kind of meritocracy, but man how many shitty movies so they aren't called more?
Are you allowed to feel that way Dr?
Starlord uses a gun to break the glass of the sphere when in the last movie when the brothers are in the sphere Jimmy Fallon shots a gun at the glass to prove its bullet proof. WTF
Not to mention that guns are less effective underwater...
@@MonsterMasher137 exactly so stupid.
maybe it's because the glass has aged? then again knowing the film it's probably just because they forgot.
@@madladdie7069 Even if that was the case there is an even dumber scene just before it because Starlord get's engulfed by the pyroclastic flow and walks out with no ill effects when he should have been boiled from the inside out.
Just ignore the fact that everything else in the race to the cliff edge scene should have died because you can't outrun the pyroclastic flow when you're that close to the volcanoe due to it moving at a minimum speed of 100 kpm and is capable of moving at 700 kpm
@@chaptermastermarneuscalgar6926 yeah that scene can't be defended in any way.
it's a movie about dinosaurs with a volcano in it, the writers chose not to fact check some stuff and it didn't end so well for them.
Cannot wait for MauLer's "Jurassic World: Dominion: An Unbridled Rage" video.
*An Unbridled Catastrophe
Probably would be another 'Unbridled Cataclysm'
I love that you use Luke as wtf insert, use it forever now.
Its a meme so fair, probably will since its too good not to
@@dimitriwarchief301 Forest Whitaker: "Save the meme!"
Steven Reyna
so far so good
the ads for the fucking movie sound like a pornhub advertisement
"They are alive, like me" is the "she lost the will to live" of the JP franchise
WHAT IS YOUR DEGREE IN POETRY?!? OH, LETS NOT USE THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF EQUIPMENT AROUND US.
It's worse, even. I saw this trainwreck in cinema and that line made me actually angry. It was so dumb and cringe. I felt sorry for paying money on my ticket. This is why pirating is better.
"She has lost the will to live" ladies and gentlemen the brilliant dialogue of George Lucas
The girl just nearly got killed by a dino, and that's her best excuse? F-U movie.
"And as such I'll let them free so they can wreck havock on unsuspecting humans"
The clone kid was the true evil mastermind
This video has been out for over 2 years now but I don't think that anyone seems to understand that Jeff Goldblum is back.
Also you probably don’t know this but there are terrifying dinosaurs and exploding volcanos
I read part of your comment as
"I don't think anyone seems to understand that Jeff Goldblum is black"
wait, he was in this?
if there's no Screen Rant video explaining to me the 9 things i didn't understand about the movie, it didn't happen...
@@johnk.7523 Oh good, that wasn't just me 😂
If this movie was reality and I was Chris Pratts character, I would have literally fed that little fucking brat to the dinosaurs if she had actually released the dinosaurs the way she did. It's only a fitting punishment for the lives that you are going to destroy.
Just chucks her into the crowd as heels shrugs and later tells the authorities that she slipped.
Yea that’s fair
I'm months late, but still... that stupid little brat deserves to be munched on by a velociraptor! She just doomed countless people with her idiocy.
Production Team: *Constantly promotes the fact that Jeff Goldblum is in the movie.*
Screen Writers: *Only puts Goldblum on screen for five minutes.*
Still... best scene in the whole shitshow... well because Goldblum.
They must have gotten the idea from 343 Industry’s marketing team for Halo 5.
Probably didnt want Goldblums crappy acting stinking up the move.
Instead they made his acting look good.
@@elLooto I think that's a bit harsh, he's very capable of selling a character to us. Just not a wide range of them. :)
Less than that
For all the myriad faults of The Lost World and JP3 (especially the latter), they both had something that I didn't appreciate until it was conspicuously absent in Fallen Kingdom: trauma.
The main characters of the first film were not better off for having survived the horrific ordeal in the park. If anything, it was the exact opposite. Ian Malcolm lost his job and was turned into a public laughingstock because he was the only one to break the NDA that InGen had them all sign before going to the island (he tried to expose them when he found out that they weren't going to be held responsible for the deaths that occurred). Dr. Grant was struggling to make ends meet as an archaeologist while being constantly reminded that all his hard-won knowledge and experience was completely overshadowed by the 'fame' of having been one of the survivors of Jurassic Park. He and Ellie also broke up (and, unlike Starlord and Heels, they were in a relationship before the events of the film, so it's not like their relationship had been founded on a traumatic experience) and she apparently left the field of paleobotany entirely for the quiet life of a suburban wife and mother.
There had been no silver lining to the stormcloud that was Jurassic Park. None of them remembered the events of the film with even the tiniest amount of fondness, even the ones whose lives were demonstrably worse than before the events of JP1. Ian and Grant didn't go back to their respective dino-islands out of some Rambo-esque 'This is the only thing I'm good for!' instinct. Ian went to the island because someone he cared about was there, and his plan was to get her and LEAVE IMMEDIATELY. Grant went to the island not only because he was told (falsely) that they wouldn't actually be setting foot on the island, but he was promised (also falsely) a shitload of money that he and his apprentice/student/whatever desperately needed to continue their work.
And, most importantly, the movie never tries to convince us that the characters are in the wrong for wanting no part of any dino-island expedition. Nobody tries to guilt them into it. Hell, the people who lied to Grant in JP3 did so because they had family that went missing off the coast of the island, but the movie didn't try and pull any "Please, Dr. Grant! You're the only one that can help save our son!" bullshit where Grant refuses but then agrees because he decided it would be selfish not to. None of that shit.
But for some reason...Claire specifically wants to go back. She saw numerous people die horrific deaths, including her boss and assistant, and barely escaped alive along with her nephews (who also almost died numerous times). I know her 'arc' in the last movie was finally recognizing the dinosaurs as living creatures, so she can still be doing her 'save the dinosaurs' thing, I guess, but why would she want to actually go to the island? It would have been so easy to set up reasons why she thinks she HAS to go back. They'd be trite, but they'd at least be something. Like maybe that tracking system isn't keyed to her and her alone. Maybe it's also keyed to sufficiently-senior members of the Jurassic World staff, but the problem is that they're all either dead (Indian!Hammond, Vincent Notdiofrio, etc) or in hiding (Dr. Wu), leaving just her and Owen, which leads to each of them agreeing to go to the island because they don't want to saddle the other with the responsibility of going alone or turning it down and sealing the dinosaurs' fates.
And as for Owen...why is he introduced building a goddamn house? Give him some parallels to Grant, at least. Like, maybe there was leaked footage of him and the raptors fighting the I-Rex, or something like that. Tons of people think he's an ultra-cool badass, but all Owen remembers is barely surviving a horrible nightmare that the world seems to want nothing more than to CONSTANTLY REMIND HIM OF. It's not like he has a lot of marketable skills, so maybe he's living out of a trailer, working a shitty hourly job at a diner or something (RLM made that particular suggestion, and it was stellar). Give him a beard to make him a bit less recognizable, and when Claire comes to talk to him he makes it clear that he LIKES having finally found anonymity, even if it's in a run-down diner in Nowheresville. But Claire, who doesn't exactly disguise herself and didn't realize that's what Owen was doing, ends up getting recognized, and Owen gets recognized by association. So, faced with the choice of uprooting himself again to try and escape his reputation, he agrees to accompany Claire to the island to watch her back. Hell, and throw in a big paycheck, too.
Just...give us a better reason for them going back than 'Save the dinosaurs!' and 'Blue is a special snowflake,' the latter of which-
-well, maybe another time. This comment is too long as it is.
Wonderfully said. The difference between a good story and a bad one is oftentimes the characters. The characters of Jurassic Park 1-3 aren't caricatures of anything, they feel like real people in the real world, with realistic reactions to everything happening around them(mostly). That is what makes Jurassic Park 1-3 thriller style movies with dinos, where JW1 and JW2 are by the books action movies with dinos, with by the books caricatures of action movie characters. And it's not that I'm against badass action characters either. Muldoon and Tembo are some of the coolest characters around, but they're grounded in reality compared to Owen.
Started to ramble with your ideas a bit, but a damn fine comment and series of ideas/suggestions. Maybe you should of wrote the film lol.
Oh man, I can't agree more. Even in theaters, that whole stupid scene of "You raised blue! Don't you wanna go back and save her?" just threw me the hell off. I was expecting Owen to say what any animal handler would: "What? No, of course not. She's not a magical talking orphan puppy, she's a lethal predator. Did you forget that she tried to kill us multiple times? And that was BEFORE being left isolated for multiple years."
They just kept one-upping themselves with that whole forced "Oh yeah turns out blue was super special and was totally super compassionate and friendly and her and owen were BFF's!". Thrown in to sell more toys.
You know, it's amazingly ironic that these movies are going the way they are, considering the infamous "plastic lunch box" scene with jeff goldblum in the first one. Hollywood is the ridiculous "big silly evil corporation trying to capitalize on dinosaurs, trying to take something they don't understand and make money out of it" and they don't even know it
>his apprentice/student/whatever
I believe you are referring to his Billy, sir. It's what you would call a "Slackjawed, Bodyhairless boy servant". It's more developed in the book, and a really interesting aspect of Dr. Grants Native maori culture.
Your point about the guilt trip either ignores the whole point of this story or you are just indirectly saying you disagree with it. One way or the other, this movie (and respectively JW1 aren't trying to mimic the designs of the first 3 films.) Their characters aren't meant to reflect anyone from the first few films. It is in fact meant to be a stark contrast to the original. This is made clearer by the fact that they choose to assume a new title for the films. ("World" rather than "park") No these movies are designed to be what Trevorrow calls Amblin films. He has modeled his characters after the archetypal characters from the Indiana Jones films. That is why Owen is the awesome male badass that rarely makes mistakes. Which is all well and fine if you liked Indiana Jones movies lol. Additionally Claire character arc is central to the plot of the film. She is one who was designed to have the most lasting and noticeable change throughout the course of the trilogy. She viewed the dinos as income source in the first film, but after witnessin f.c the death of one Brachiosaurus. Her views radically changed. She became a dinosaur rights activist. Which when it comes down to it this new movie is very symbolic arguing both sides for the morality of Michael Crichton's own chaos theory. You can say what you want about the Romance plot and I'd agree that it may be the weakest part of the films, but hey... I didn't come here for Romance... I came here for an explanation of abuse of genetic power explored in a unique and thrilling way with my favorite animals by far: Dinosaurs! And gosh do they look better than ever! (Except Rexy, but that is simply due to continuity. She is 20 years old now! Of course her roar is getting weaker)
Oh and also id like to point out that the relationship of Blue and Owen maybe unusual to you, but I find it to be one of the most refreshing aspects of the film. Blue was one iteration of many failed attempts to make a Raptor which actually showed compassion to its Imprinted leader. All of this built off the famous "they are not monsters Lex, they are just Animals" uttered by the one and only Doctor Grant. There is a com mom on misconception that in JP3 Grant recanted that viewpoint, but in fact his feeling about the creatures he saw in the first movie were complicated in it that he was still utterly fascinated by the Raptors. Just watch the scene when he is conversing at Ellie's house. You can see the spark in his eye when they recount the encounters with the raptors.
No these movies aren't the same as the originals but they are genuinely more thoughtful than anyone cares to give them credit for. Audience scores at a large percent of theatres gave it an A-! Fallen Kingdom is actually my favorite in the series followed by JP 1. I can't wait for JW3! 2021 baby.
i just love how they hyped jeff for this, and only put him in like 2 fucking scenes.
Lmao seriously that was so pathetic
They put him because they “had” too. he was probably a after thought
Like captain phasma, hype up a character then don't use them
I don't know much about this franchise, but was he that popular of a character? Or do people just like Jeff Goldblum?
@@jewishiceberg7714 I'm pretty sure every jurrasic Park fan loves him
oh, so heels was a trained phlebotomist at one point? or do the writers think just anyone is allowed to draw blood for the red cross?
And of course drawing blood from humans enables you to do it from dinos
I love the fact the Luke milk scene is now used for everything that makes no sense and is total and utter bullshit. Thank you Last Jedi for giving us that meme. It's the one decent thing you did.
May the Milk be with you.
Yes
No dont give that melon head any credit its a stupid scene & its a stupid meme
@@Edward-6909 wat mate?
One point you missed. Blue is running around and doing all this fighting n stuff at the end of the movie with a barely patched up gunshot wound.
Lazy writing Moses.....lazy lazy writing
Jesus christyou're right. The plot goes so fast it hopes your brain doesn't have time to notice all the inconsistencies. If they keep making movies like this, we're going to need Every Frame A Pause for each of them just to understand them!
Yeah I didn't even notice this when I saw this in theaters...I think I was laughing too hard at the scene where it jumps away from an explosion after smelling gas in the air.
Wait all of this footage is promotional? How the hell
Watch enough trailers see the whole thing lol
That's most trailers, tho. I swear Hollywood can't do anything correctly anymore...
I think that’s why I don’t really go to the cinema any more, if you see a trailer for a movie and like it.. but see the whole movie in the trailer, then what’s the point in going to see it? The movies pointless if it could’ve been told in 3 minutes lol
I don’t think I even agree with this and I just wrote it lol
I'm a massive Jurassic Park fan, and even though all the 3 sequels before this had been trash I watched all the trailers to see how good the film looked, and it looked amazing, because I think this film did have some interesting things happen, but also because the trailers are misleading. in the end, I ended up seeing it and almost everything I thought was cool about the trailer wasn't expanded upon in the film, it was just what happened in the trailer + filler, now it's just a hilariously bad b movie plot.
I can't wait for the unbridled rage for Rise of Skywalker - he will be able to play over half of the movie, at least, from the promos alone.
24:32 What she should have said is:"Hammond's team couldn't find complete DNA for any one species, so they shared it arround. They gave all the 2&3 fingerd carnivores, the same blood-type.
Ok, that actually makes sense.
I'm pretty sure blood types would be the least of the problems. By the way, a random sea gull would been a better donor based on actual taxonomy.
@FATEd Pondera Well first off, Humans, have 4-8 different blood types, you can mix some (O- is universally accepted) but not others (AB+ can only go to fellow AB+s).
I would assume frogs would also have blood type, so even ignoring the species barrier, blood type alone would make it very risky unless you test the donor and recipient, as you have a greater than 50% chance of causing a lot of bad shit to happen.
@@happydemon3038 irregardless of blood type, a body can recognize another's cells as just not being its own, so even if we match an A to an A there's a chance it still gets fucked anyway
@ZeraSeraphim
How many frogs would you need to squeeze dry to get the blood for a dinosaur blood transfussion I wonder?
Even the velociraptor on the plane that spoke "Alan" is embarrassed.
Khan Skywalker XDDDDD
I am dead.
Put this on my tombstone.
It was a nightmare
The writers of this film also worked on Rise of Skywalker so that explains a lot, but what I don't understand is why these writers haven't been found and savagely beaten for their crimes.
For one, there are people who defend these movies. Perhaps they just enjoyed the movie but not for any logical reason and refuse to admit that they are bad movies, but there are real people who like this stuff. Also, these movies still make a lot of money. Keep in mind that everyone who paid to watch ROS and this movie who hated them didn't get a refund and are included in the profits of those movies.
@@joebomb1019 fallen kingdom was good misunderstood movie just watch guy shinobi03 response to nostalgia critic jurassic world fallen kingdom video to see what I mean
@@matejajanic6932 Fallen Kingdom is an insult to the franchise
No wonder the films sucked
@@matejajanic6932 It's not misunderstood, it's really easy to understand. People want money. Actors, writers, directors, and studio execs are people (I know, that's a stretch for studio execs, but the point about _wanting money_ stands.) There's money to be had in nostalgia bait. So the studios finance it, the writers write it, the directors direct it, and the actors act in it.
I literally just had a nightmare about being attacked by a Velociraptor in my own home because that girl decided to release ferocious carnivores into the real world. I'm not even joking.
Obi-Wan Kenobi lame
Did it say "Alan" just before you woke up?
Obi-Wan Kenobi I see you everywhere also lol
Obi-Wan Kenobi, How many times did the dino say your name?
But... you know the ways of the force.
I was instantly pissed off early in the movie when the characters were willing to put the dinosaurs on this amazing isolated island (I mean the island wasnt real but they thought it was) A untouched island like that would have a unique ecosystem due to being separated from the rest of the world, and the selfish ass heros are willing to risk all these potentially one of a kind natural species for their artificially created monsters.
“Artificially created monsters” they’re still animals mate.
Wait, when you point a large gun-shaped object with a lasersight at someone and press a button, the dinosaur will kill that person for you? What if the gun-shaped object was just a gun, the button was the trigger, and you do it without the dinosaur?
There you go again. Using your brain to think.
Except the guy you're pointing it at, with the right equipment would be able to see the laser and where its coming from. Tanks, for example, have this tech built in. In either sense, this is all assuming the animal isn't going to be killed when the man who you're pointing the laser at sees the big predator approaching him and he shoots it with a large caliber weapon.
what if someone in that 3rd world country has a mirror to reflect the beam to a tree or back at you? I mean it is just light of a specific wavelength once word got out everyone in every country would have similar lasers for defense right?
Admiral Fritts Why would you send a raptor after a tank? Just because you use a tool incorrectly doesn't mean it's a bad tool
bificommander
It was a gun though? That had the sonic emitter attached.
That way you could deploy a trooper with a bonded Indoraptor where you can at the same time control a target for the Raptor while shooting targets yourself.
Dunno if it was just a prototype gun also made just for the purpose of the showing of Indoraptor and was only in shape to make the Raptor know it's a safe tool used for it's control.
I mean the pointer stuff is easily explainable.
In Jurassic Park, Steven Spielberg made something real, that viewers believed they could see and touch. Jurassic World 2 was definitely the flea circus.
Indeed
In Jurassic Park Spielberg butchered the book Crichton wrote. The parts where then turned into three movies of which none got the message quite right and only the first one can be argued for as an honest effort to adapt the book.
Doncornuto don’t think it was so much an adaption as it was “based on”. Game of thrones is an adaption of a song of ice and fire. JP is not the same, nor was it meant to be
Doncornuto and we are talking about being a good movie, not a good adaptation so that argument doesnt make sense
@@Doncornuto Well, the lost world is based on the lost world book
At this point the thumbnail might as well represent MauLer's frustration at dealing with these copyright claims
"UNIVERSAL!"
It’s kind of funny to me that this movie positions the biologists and zoologists as the dino-crazed people who want to save the dinosaurs at all costs, when in reality the biggest opposition to de-extinction as a concept and theoretical practice comes from biologists and zoologists who argue that it’s unethical, dangerous, and could potentially lead to ecological disaster if de-extinct populations start to move into modern ecosystem.
Like, you might find some scientists who would be willing to support de-extinction for important keystone species that died out prematurely from anthropogenic means, like the Thylacine or the Ivorybill Woodpecker, as that would actually help to restore balance to various ecosystem, but literally the only people that want to bring back non-avian dinosaurs and mammoths and shit like that and let them run around in the wild are either crackpot pseudo scientists (like the one Dude who’s trying to use mRNA in chickens to revive ancestral dinosaur traits in living individuals) or members of the general public who don’t know enough about ecology to realize how horrible of an idea it would be and just want to be able to look at living dinos cause it’s cool. Most actual scientists in the relevant fields recognize how pointless, unethical and wasteful that proposition is. Like why would you want to throw millions of dollars and thousands of man hours of research time to bring back a T-Rex, when you could use those resources to protect species that aren’t extinct but are on the brink of dying out unless proper action is taken? It’s ludicrous
what did you expect, for hollywood to actually start thinking for once
There is a simple reason: dinosaurs have PR value
I didn’t realize bringing back mammoths would be a bad thing. Why would it? I thought I read they would theoretically help fight climate change?
Great observation and argument! Thank you for putting it in words...
I've noticed how an unfortunate majority of people who identify themselves as 'Jurassic Park/World fans' or just general 'dinosaur fans' seem to only consume and propagate this kind of media without properly understanding what the main message of the first (and perhaps second) film(s) of the Jurassic series is: bringing back extinct lifeforms from millions of years ago into the modern age and attempting to control it is dangerous and moronic. Nobody seems to care about the actual philosophical or moral implications of the first film, only the autistic obsession and hyperfixation on "DINOSAURS!!!". It's sad, it really is.
So, this version is made entirely out of clips that are from Universal's own TH-cam channel and the available movies, meaning that we are in fair use territory entirely now people. The saddest element to this is that so many of you guys' comments are now wasted, loads of discussion removed 3 times, but this is definitively the last time, this video should survive the months of appeals.
Once Gary, the guy at Universal, hits this video with a claim I will push the appeal as far as I can, if it leads to a strike on the channel then so be it, if I do nothing else then the video will never reach TH-cam's listings and that would be a shame considering how much work it took to make.
So hopefully this one stays up, I doubt it though. I am putting out a Q&A video soon now though, I will cover this briefly as well as answer plenty of you guys' questions :D / from there, it's on to TFA and the full assessment!
Here's to hoping Gary fucks off ! (And who knows, maybe you'll feature in the next film as that disgruntled fan films are so fond of putting in these days)
"MauLer is infringing on our right by using clips from out youtube channel.youtube please strike this video as well.fair use what's that? never heard of it"-someone from universal studio 2018
youtube:"sure no problem give us money".
I enjoyed the little letter you wrote to universal but in all likelyhood they aren't watching the video, they're just flagging it because the first one you made was seen and it hurt their feelings.
Good work Mauler. Keep pushing those big corporations and shitty movie makers. If they ban your video so many times is because it hurts them (maybe even more than they annoy you).
Well time to watch it again lol oh and fuck off Gary!
Do you know how much it would cost the military just to feed these so called "weapons" every month, they aren't like traditional weapons during peacetime that simply only need storage. There would have to be dedicated teams of men to keep them fit and alive and the cost wouldn't just be outrageous it would literally be unsustainable. To top it off dinosaurs are not even remotely suitable for modern war, one predator drone with one missile and that money dumpster would be rendered useless within mere seconds. It's as if the writers are from the middle ages and have absolutely zero common knowledge of modern life and warfare. You would literally have to have lived in total isolation for the past 500 years to even consider fucking "dinosaurs" for any sort of military application.
Unfortunately Goose, They're just Female with a dash of Soyboys thrown in to correct the most egregious writing errors, most of whom did not get their job by demonstrating exceptional writing skills....
@@CClausen85 well Chris I simply can't disagree with ur logic on this one my friend, in addition to obvious and poor writing skills I also find it incredibly odd that every movie nowadays has 4-8 writers , of course these movies are gonna be disjointed garbage fires when u got 5 people trying to write 1 story. When I was growing up there was 1 witer and 1 director and if the movie sucked u knew who to blame , so many good movies tho benefited from having that coherent vision and 1 guiding hand , now 15 different people are involved, theres way too many cooks in the kitchen and the soup tastes like ass!
@@CClausen85 What do you expect movies are now made via a consensus with the film companies having way to much control over the films instead of letting directors create their vision.
@@TheDevilinThePaleMoonlight well if you look at marvel they can get the job done it's just these people hire shitty writers and directors that's all look at Russo brothers they can handle over 20 characters in one movie these fuckers can't even get 2 people right
Silliest Goose a lot of classics have 2/3 screenwriters, but 3 is the absolute max. Collaboration can be great so you have someone to bounce ideas off of and to strike down the terrible ones. But you’re absolutely right about these 5-20 writer “teams” not having any idea what they’re doing, at all.
Really curious about if you got hit with a dumb copyright strike after that fantastic intro
Hey there, I'm from the future, and the vid didn't get striked ! ...Yet.
When it comes to big studios and companies like Universal it's not those companies themselves that strike videos. There are actual contractor companies that specialise in dmcas and they usually use bots to auto to mark videos for striking so they don't even watch the video. Nintendo and many other japanese companies pay such contractors once a year so there is always a period each year that's full of copyright strikes for game and anime related channels. It's crazy.
Disagree with a lot of the video, loved the movie, but I liked the video for that intro...
Purps -- "stricken" is past participle of "strike".
@@stevequizodlibumpbumpbump3575 I'm almost certain "struck down" makes the most sense, but it's the YT comment section so I'm legally required to insult your sexuality now
I can’t believe he didn’t talk about the cartoon scene where the Indoraptor smiles and wiggles its tale when it’s about to kill Wild Bill. That scene alone should have caused this movie to win a razzie.
Ikr, and think about how insanely intelligent that "dinosaur" would have to be to feign being tranqualized or even realize that was a tranqualizer. It's not like it knew that he wanted to enter the cage to get a tooth so why even pretend to be put down? Ugh.
Jesus, who fucking cares if it smiles, oh no, “cry me a fucking river barry”
Tech guy and biology girl are some of the most insufferable characters in movie history.
But MUH REPRESENTATION
I think you could make a legitimate argument that Sarah Harding is objectively the worst character in the series all things considered.
Example
Her introduction scene, she practically almost gets her boyfriend and company attacked and maimed by stegosaurus...stegosauri..stegosauruseses…because she had to French kiss a baby stego while it was in its nest with its obvious big as fuck parents right around the corner…
Next couple scenes, lectures the camera man about smoking cigarettes, and goes as far as to say “if we even so much as bend a blade of grass, that’s too much”
Bitch you just tongue punched a stego!
@@oddballskull1941 Tech guy's screaming is still far more insufferable.
@@oddballskull1941 she was far better in the book
not nearly as insufferable as the army of virgins who bitch about everything they hate about the latest blockbuster film that failed to live up to their expectations
There's no story to tell.
There's no world to set and build on.
There's no message to deliver.
It's just f*#&in' dinosaur time!
Jurassic World 2
Summer 2018
URProductions the funny thing is that this would be a lot more honest marketing, and i bet it would have performed even better.
Agreed, this video could have been 40min shorter lol
@@jasoncarter1869 Actually it would be even shorter if the writers considered the fact that humans were never a part of the ecosystems inhabited by dinosaurs not even mentioning that they didn't exist at the same time, meaning that dinosaurs wouldn't consider humans prey.
Best line of the entire video:
"You're going to sell them on the black market? Who is this idea for, Russians or something? Are they going to invade America on top a T-Rex?.......... Actually, that would be a better film. Make that film." XD
isn't that the plot in Iron Sky 2?
I love this movie, and the comments in this comment section infuriate me, but this is truly an awesome line.
@@bandenboy Yes, yes that is.
@@beckettmaffei I'm glad you like the movie but seeing as you watched the video can you atleast understand why people dislike it and why its objecticely pretty bad lol
@@FanksCast Wow. What a reasonable and grown up response to someone who liked the movie. I'm both surprised and happy!
Duh… don’t guns have laser sighting? - Using a laser as a targeting device for a dinosaur to attack is like building a jet plane and then using the onboard computer as a flight simulator 🤷♂️
Who wrote this storyline?
[ T h e y. W o u l d. B e. S h i t. I n. A. W a r ]
Point it in a direction and pray lol
@@hahano6054 Roman War Pigs were more efficient. Douse them in lard, stand back and set them on fire...
@@Darkdaej plus after the pig dies you can eat it.
Now that is a fact.
Definetly!!!!
"Hey discount Hammond, the guy you work with has created a new raptor with a yellow stripe that can follow human commands. He plans to sell this creature to colonel mcguffin for $175 million on the eve of overmorrow with the desire to replace thousands of boots on the ground"
"Ha ha silly child, you probably misheard them"
Kind sir, it's colonel mcmuffin.
@Jerry Graham I can't tell what your point of view is or what you're talking about as i haven't seen terminator 2. If they had a scene like this where a kid mentioned something important and an adult ignored them then it's as equally dumb
$175 million? Pft, try fucking less than 30. They sold it for $28 million in the movie. Let that sink in.
@Jerry Graham Yeah, a car crash that happened years ago. Which I'd say is more than enough time for trauma to pass, considering she doesn't even remember the event. Also, he confronted the guy with no security, or even somebody else to watch him. A frail, dying old man. How seriously do you think he was really taking this?
@Jerry Graham Why not call the authorities at that point? "I have reason to believe an associate of mine is dealing in illegal trade of dangerous animals on my property" is a story to say if he MUST keep the Dinosaurs unmentioned. If he believes Maisie then he should know confronting Mills without any physical back up (at least people he THINKS to be on his side) is probably not going to serve any good purpose for him.
He's potentially the only person who knows what Mills is doing with the Dinosaurs at this point, so assuming Mills only killed him because he found out (given he didn't do it as soon as they made it back to the property with the Dinosaurs), telling Mills what he knows with no authorities or manpower is the absolute worst course of action even compared to keeping quiet and testifying about it the next morning when he can go to the Police after the fact when they're not on as high alert or suspicious.
Whether or not he believes Maisie, the confrontation is an incredibly dumb decision from a character who is at worst altruistically naive but not depicted as outright unintelligent.
In answer to your lack of knowledge on volcanoes - a pyroclastic surge can go upwards of 400mph and reach about about 1000 degrees celsius. They would've all died instantly.
Rory H “oh what do you know? Have you never heard of suspension of disbelief?”
I think he was quoting Ed Wood.
Yep, much dumber than 2012 in that regard.
That part when the volcano's explosive eruption silenced a fully grown multi-ton T-Rex roaring angrily, but Star-Lord didn't felt it.
You had me at "children get amazed by car keys." Suddenly I remembered every single time an adult jingled a set of car and house keys in front of a baby. Starlord's "chicken" also gave me a chuckle. Frankly, the one scene in all these films is the "death of the babysitter." She was a simple innocent casualty that didn't need to die, and certainly didn't need to die in such an incredibly horribly violent way.
Imagine getting water boarded by a pteranodon. What a way to go. When you think about it, though, the pteranodon’s beak implies it’s probably a fish eater. It’s very long and, if I remember correctly, they have needle like teeth to keep fish in their mouth. So they wouldn’t really have predatory instincts to go for the throat when hunting prey that you can’t kill with one swoop. So drowning her was actually a genius move on the dinosau- wait… flying reptile’s part. Too bad for our said flying reptile, it didn’t know what lived in the waters and paid the price for trying to bite off more than it could chew
@@handleonafridge6828 , I meant that she (the babysitter) died not by being drowned by the flying dinosaur, she died by being eaten alive my the Mosasaurus.
🤔*remembers my baby nieces and nephews get amazes by keys*
Yep that's accurate
@-Rotparhatu- Stop apologizing for knowing things. Or for sharing the slightest bit of information ever. The sort of people that will verbally attack you for it are the assholes. The jealous, petty, childish, spoiled assholes. And they’ll think less of you for being smart and talking, whether you bow to them and apologize and act like you actually did something wrong, or not.
It really pisses me off that every movie after the original was just a "check in each box" feature.
People running - check.
Rex, raptors, and at least one new predator in each film - check.
Some element of nostalgia - check.
Dinosaurs play to human emotions/interaction rather than animal instinct or laws of nature - check.
Kids insignificant to the outcomes of the story who have a heroic moment, then continue to be a hindrance to the main characters - check.
There are fantastic storylines, unexplored features and new elements that are completely watchable. Movie makers HAVE to make a box office hit, which defeats the entire message of the first film. The movie makers have, in fact, become John Hammond himself. Malcolm's warning in the boardroom in the first film applies to the entire existence of the film franchise, not just the concept of the park.
They're more like InGen but I totally agree with you. It is utterly mind-boggling to me that none of the writers for these Jurassic World movies ever took those words seriously and not one, NOT ONE, understood what each of the sequel films were trying to say. The dinosaurs are what we would call an invasive species as they have no natural predators and are capable of wrecking any ecosystem that they come across. There is nothing on earth that can take on a full-size T-Rex, a full-sized Mosasaurus, a pack of Velociraptors, heck even the plant-eaters would destroy all of the flora that other animals would need to survive. This is why they remained on the islands and all travel to them was barred. I can't believe that they have plans to make another Jurassic World movie after this one with the dinosaurs and humans living together. You can't even do that since there are only 15 species of surviving dinosaurs left and need a pair of them to be capable of growing a population and there's only one of each.
@@GAdmThrawn
"There is nothing on earth that can take on a full size trex"
Literally majority of modern weaponry can though? It isn't nearly enough of these creatures to not be stopped by a few modern armours or even automatic rifles.
Every movie after the original one was trash. The exact same old repetitive formula. Same exact formula as Jaws, Predator, Scream, The Matrix and Pirates of the Caribbean, excellent first movie. Not so great sequels.
@Jerry Graham I actually haven’t seen them , I was mostly going off what the critics have to say, all of the first movies in those franchises I said have good critic ratings and The rest don’t, Tho I don’t always agree with the critics, they are important to the film industry. I haven’t seen all of the ones I said, but judging by the general consensus I may I might check the first 3 Pirates movies on Disney+ soon. I’m staying away from the other 2. But It really doesn’t matter what the critics say when the movies still make cash. Just ask Michael Bay or Paul WS Anderson and their Transformers and Resident Evil movies.
@Jerry Graham Well if it doesn't want to be misunderstood, at least make more common sense in the first place! (e.g. Owen has to die due to the pyroclastic flow or whatever it was, let alone have some sort of bruise.) Also don't show societal problems (e.g. ignoring law court decisions, cloning humans, releasing animals that aren't part of the ecosystem into the wild, etc.) on screen with shitty presentations. And I'm speaking like this even though I loved Jurassic Park and World (Lost World to some extent, too), and read the original novels.
0:54 "The first damn film made sense, the rest forgot what sense is and that's what bothers me"
True that. And just like that, I liked the video.
Did it make sense when the t Rex escaped it's paddock on ground level..dug a trench super fast off screen..and pushed the tour vehicle into its paddock.
There are plenty of moments and events in the first movie that do not make sense.
There are just less of those moments
@@oddballskull1941 I always wondered that too.
They’ve gone down the path of Star Wars where they just make the same threat with a slightly different twist and call it a day
It's the same writer as rise of skywalker. He's known for needless suspense and unanswered questions.
I'm waiting for Lazer raptors. 😏
Kevin Richardson even prefers not to be present when his lions are darted, because it can indeed leave bad impressions. There is only one black leopard he can personally tranquilize with a syringe, and even that requires a distraction in form of a meat treat. The animal may trust enough not to notice a gentle injection when its distracted, but even it would still be concerned if it wasn't distracted.
So... yeah, Blue is basically a Pokemon.
The rich guy having a secret plan to be more rich instead of waiting till he inherited it all anyway pulled me out of the movie
If he's already that evil why doesn't he just murder fake Hammond?
Overly rich people trying to find ways to become more rich yesterday no matter the destruction it causes is totally on point.
I will never be able to look at these movies again without hearing MauLer's nicknames.
I've had to correct myself in real life conversations after calling Rose "Shrek" unironically.
Clearly you are responsible for her leaving Instagram, TOXIC FANDOM!
Yes they perfectly given, are they not?
MauLer "MUH BULLYING! THINK ABOUT THE POOR MULTI MILLIONARE HOLLYWOOD STARS!
Denker Bosu Marie-Tran used Star Wars to pay off her student loans and is not a "multi-millionaire."
Not sure how that would matter anyway since that would imply rich people can't be bullied or harassed or made to feel like shit, which is a retarded idea.
Hehe, yes. As long as you don't call the actress after this nickname, I'm sure she is a nice person IRL (and she's not responsible for the script writing).
Speaking of the Mosasaurus; why is there a door connecting it's den to the Ocean??? Leaving aside it's Den being retconned so it's now right next to the ocean, why? The writers really couldn't be fucked this time could they?
It's just so it could be released "accidentally". It's so contrived.
The gate between the Mosasaurus tank and the river is used to move the Mosasaurus so they can drain the tank to clean it. Colin Trevarrow has stated that he used the wrong map of Isla Nublar on his twitter and if you look back at maps from the first movie, there is a river connecting the ocean.
@Henry Louis21 Plus, the Mosasaurus could eat scuba divers and drones that try to clean the tank.
@Henry Louis21 But wait, why do they have canals big enough for a Mosasaurus to get through then? They were building an entire park including a Gigantic Mosasaur and they didn't think to reduce the size to stop it from accidentally escaping, or just build another gigantic waiting pen on another end of the tank, so they could keep it there before cleaning the main tank?
17:46 - I hate to break it to you but the one part you've actually liked so far also has a very stupid element that you missed. Owen breaks the glass we were specifically told is bullet proof in the last movie by shooting it.
Doesn't he only crack the glass with the bullets though? he ends up breaking them out by wedging his knife in, if I remember right.
@@MauLerYT iirc it was suggested in that video (in the previous movie) that bullets couldn't damage the glass. Although said video had a comedic tone to it, so who knows? Still, if the glass was completely bulletproof then it really doesn't make sense that the gunshot would cause as much damage as it did and the fact that the water would probably slow the bullet down makes the scene even less logical. Although I'm no expert in physics so I could be wrong about this.
Btw, have you heard about the TH-camr SHINOBI-03? He has made some videos in response to all the Nostalgia Critic's Jurassic Park reviews and is going to make a 4-part video series responding to people who hated on Fallen Kingdom, including you and Wolf. He's taken some light jabs at you on twitter too, though he didn't tag you in his tweets. This might sound extremely petty but I really want you to do an EFAP responding to his Fallen Kingdom videos. There has been a disappointing absence of Fallen Kingdom on your EFAP series and I really want to see what you and the others think of the arguments given in favour of this movie.
@@HagridRKZ I have to watch this. Someone is defending this shite?
No I can't his voice is too annoying.
@@evilelf6188 If you meant his accent then (to play the devil's advocate for a bit) he said he'd upload the video with subtitles just in case his accent wasn't understandable. I haven't seen the videos myself and don't really intend to any time soon since they all apparently clock in at 4 hours and 25 minutes total. As hypocritical as it may sound, I have no intention of watching someone defend something I don't like for 4 and a half hours straight.
From what I've heard, MauLer apparently had expressed an interest in doing an EFAP episode for this on his discord but knowing how long the whole thing is, I have a feeling that he might skip this. Unfortunate really since I'd have loved to see an EFAP episode dedicated to Fallen Kingdom. Guess you can't have everything.
Wait, how the hell was the Mosasaurs still alive in its tank? The park must have been manually feeding this thing when it was still operating. So this thing has not eaten in X amount of time (likely years) but is still alive....somehow.
The only other option is there is an entire ecosystem also living in this tank that is self-sustaining and thriving to a point that it can replenish itself faster than the Mosasaur can feed (which is ALOT given the size of this thing).
I always assumed it munched on any dinos or pteradons that came too close to the wayer
All of these franchises getting nuked by Hollywood...it's sad.
Yellow: B U L L E T S W O N ' T W O R K S T A R L O R D
Blue: *Screeches*
Yellow: *Sweats*
Hahaha
They must be using airsoft guns like those “non-lethals” from the last film.
Bullets nearly killed Blue. So if bullets don't do shit to the Indoraptor, how the fuck is something vulnerable to bullets going to do anything useful? The logic makes no sense.
Haku infinite not to mention the incredible cost and effort to transport a dinosaur to an active war zone unharmed. I would compare it to bringing an enraged, uncontrollable, and self-aware M1 Abrams Tank. Infinitely more expensive and more dangerous than a box of grenades.
That last sceen where the little girl let them out did it for me. I allowed all the other bullshit for some reason. I wont see the next one or any that possibly come after that.
DRFESTERPUS69 uwu I don’t want this t rex to die... fuck every hiker, rural population, every one outside in general, etc... lmao
But uwu the dinos :(
Yeah, my thoughts were "alright ya little shit, you want to be one of them? go on then!" and just throw her in with them.
It was so baffling in how unfitting it was. But hey, do we go for the dramatic ending that'll leave an impact and conclude the series in a satisfying way, or do we let the dinosaurs run amok because we're out for money and just wanna set up a shitty sequel, refusing to let one of the biggest film series in the world die with dignity?
I stopped when the trex and raptor nodded their fuking heads in the first one
@@artexfyne8122 That was terrible too. They're not played off like real life intelligent animals anymore, they're treated like fucking action heroes
My favorite "How it Should Have Ended Video" on the Jurassic World gate nonsense: "make smaller doors" and "dig moats" because "zoos have been doing THIS for ages!" 🤣🤣
In the lava part you forgot to mention that the lava was falling into the room. Yet they can climb safely up with no lava in sight when they get up top.
to be fair, there was lava basically all the way up to the trap door :)
Plus if that was real lava there eyeballs would disintegrate and they’d catch on fire the moment they come within a metre of it
@@tytsty5716 I watched this movie specifically so i can watching this video after it. I was really hoping him to mention that regarding the Starlord scene when he was just recovering from the tranquilizer with lava 2 inches from him. Really wanted to see him use the scene where Anakin spontaneusly catches fire from being too close to lava :(
@@mrkiky lol when the star wars prequals are more accurate to real life than your movie about dinosaurs living in modern times you know youve fucked up
@@tytsty5716 that, is embarrassing
Intro:
"I am so very british that when you hear my voice you will throw tea in the sea just to feel safe."
Vollification I throw tea in the harbor regardless
@@looinrims Cool :)
Who the fuck drinks tea anyways?
@@Vollification Brits.
I almost thought TearofGrace did the intro with how much tea was coursing through that voice
Vollification The Spiffing Brit wants to know your location.
I think the big issue is, Jurassic park as an idea has enough material for one good story, it would take a genius to create a sequel on par with the original that matched its tone and themes, even Crichton couldn’t really do it.
After the second film, they’re just monster movies with terrible storylines
The Lost World book was way different than the movie and its overall point was that Dinosaurs resurrected through cloning wouldnt be able to learn behavior from their parents. Thus how they act and react would be quite different from their natural dinosaur ancestors and they would be completely out of balance with each other. They should have made the movie using that plot point, It would have been much more interesting.
Crichton had no interest in writing the second book; the studio "convinced" him to.
@@maddening4196 that's interesting, considering they borrowed very little from the plot of the book. Why bother pushing him to write the book if theyre not going to use it?
So much wrong in this thread
@@quicksilver5794 because they couldn't come up with any on their own... And further, they did use some things from the book, like the setting, and the second team trying to steal T-rex eggs, they had the RV trailers, and the character names and a few other things. The studio felt it was too high minded a story for the stupid audiences, so enjoy your popcorn flick, stupid. Thanks for your cash.
“Overgrown feral chicken,” is not something I figured I would hear a velociraptor being called. You earned a subscriber
Thats basically what velociraptors are..... The Jurassic park raptors are several times larger then the actual thing though.
@@Kakarot64. The real thing was just "feral chicken"
Apparently, the correct name is Utahraptor.
Whoever made this movie has no idea how lava actually works in the real world. One splash of 2,000 degree molten rock would kill anything. When lava flows into the ocean it releases massive amounts of poisonous super-heated gas. Similarly, the volcanic "smoke" that envelopes Starlord would be a pyroclastic flow i.e. heavier-than-air gasses ejected from the volcano and flowing downhill with temperatures in excess of 1,500 degrees aka melt your face off ark-of-the-covenant style termpratures..
It's called a movie, just like you're called a nerd.
@@KTK44 it's really not hard to do basic fact checking. And when your movie is about genetically engineered dinosaurs, the audience is already suspending a great deal of disbelief, do you have to keep other elements as realistic as possible. Even ignoring the science of it all, the whole volcano sequence is over-the-top and not believable.
That kept taking me out of the movie as well. I mean a dinosaur sticks his head in lava... and survives?! Also, when Starlord is still numb and moves his hand 'just in time' so the lava doesn't touch it but with how close he is to the lava, he'd been dead already! Lol
Jenny Nicholson said it the best in her review for this movie by pointing out that the lava has the rules of boiling water or just hot water where it's like, you put your hand under a hot tap and pull it back out and shake off your hand while saying "Ouch... That was hot. Ouch."
This movie made my brain mushy, several times I exclaimed, "That's not how that works!" The lava was really awful. I also laughed out loud when other Hammond asks the evil guy to get the phone and call the cops. The way it's shot where the phone is on a pillow, I just laughed because it was almost comedic. Of course that pillow is about to be used to smother him! You'd have to never watch movies to not get that. It was just way too funny and I don't think it was supposed to be funny.
@@KTK44 Having your brain turned on while watching a movie doesn't mean you're a nerd, it just means that the person with their brain on is smarter than you.
Generally speaking, the mark of a good movie is that having your brain turned on won't ruin the experience, because everything makes sense if you really think about it. In the case of some movies, like Star Wars for example, the filmmaker has to make sure that all elements that aren't part of the fantasy are realistic to help ground the movie. In star wars, families, government, and crime are real world elements that help to keep a movie about space wizards believable. This is basic filmmaking.
Now I understand why critical drinker quoted you. “They would be shit in a war” lol
It’s not the Renaissance anymore, we don’t use animals in wide scale battles anymore.
Aye I like that channel too
Humans defeated dinosaurs once. We will do so again.
When did we defeat non-avian dinosaurs? They were extinct millions of years before humans existed.
The only ones that wouldn’t be are the genetically engineered ones that are bullet resistant. And both indos tried to kill people on both occasions