This was a great interview. I always enjoying hearing about the Eucharist. I am unable to comprehend that there are people who do not believe. Thank you.
Thank you for this show. Please have Bishop Barron on again. He has a gift to explain on a level that we laity can understand while helping us grow in our Faith. Great explanation on the Eucharist with your continued explanations of early Christians. 👏👏👏
Very good show. I can attest that we true Confessional Lutherans also hold to the Real Presence and are in agreement with Rome that most of Protestantism absolutely errs regarding the Sacraments and their efficacy.
I’m ashamed that I answered money when the Bishop what would I want God to give me 😔 I should work on my heart to only desire him over everything this world could give
Hello guys, I just came from an holy hour and on my way home I listened to this podcast. I think it´s awesome. Nevertheless I have two questions: 1. At 34:40 Matt said, that if the eucharist would transform to real flesh and real blood it would disproof the doctrine. What do you then make of a eucharistic miracle where they claim that the Bread really got transformed? 2. You mentioned that we should take the last supper literal becuase the early christians took it literal. But what if there were early Christians who didn´t believe in the eucharist? Would that also disproof it?
Even when Jesus spoke these words, many didn’t believe and left. John 6: 50 This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.” 52 The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” 53 So Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.
The introduction made me so sad. There will be no want for beer in heaven, there will only be the presence of God which will fulfill us from any want of material things.
Catholics always seem to ignore John 6:35. For people who claim to have the fullness of the truth, it is strange how often the truth of that verse gets suppressed.
@@guh3777, you can just ignore that it says the context of John 6 is not literally eating bread and literally drinking wine as you do at eucharist, but remember that you then are telling God the Son that you'll be ignoring Him to listen to your "church". That's fine, you can choose to do that, but don't think for a moment that that decision won't have consequences.
Love listening to Fr Barron!
This was a great interview. I always enjoying hearing about the Eucharist. I am unable to comprehend that there are people who do not believe. Thank you.
Simply the most wonderful explanation of the Real Presence I’ve EVER heard. Thank you Bp Barron and Matt Fradd!
instablaster.
I love this podcast.
Thank you for this show. Please have Bishop Barron on again. He has a gift to explain on a level that we laity can understand while helping us grow in our Faith. Great explanation on the Eucharist with your continued explanations of early Christians. 👏👏👏
This is awesome!
Very good show. I can attest that we true Confessional Lutherans also hold to the Real Presence and are in agreement with Rome that most of Protestantism absolutely errs regarding the Sacraments and their efficacy.
Another great Video. Thanks!
That very last parallel you pointed out; just woah.
I’m ashamed that I answered money when the Bishop what would I want God to give me 😔 I should work on my heart to only desire him over everything this world could give
Hello guys, I just came from an holy hour and on my way home I listened to this podcast. I think it´s awesome. Nevertheless I have two questions:
1. At 34:40 Matt said, that if the eucharist would transform to real flesh and real blood it would disproof the doctrine. What do you then make of a eucharistic miracle where they claim that the Bread really got transformed?
2. You mentioned that we should take the last supper literal becuase the early christians took it literal. But what if there were early Christians who didn´t believe in the eucharist? Would that also disproof it?
The Eucharist becomes the body substantially.
Even when Jesus spoke these words, many didn’t believe and left.
John 6:
50 This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”
52 The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” 53 So Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.
I tweeted Mr.Rubin. ;) Anything else you need me to do for that copy of the Summa? Maybe your family laundry, or babysitting, or breakfast in bed? jk
What is the name of the song that Matt plays at the end of his videos? I think it's by his sister Emma, but can't find the name of it anywhere.
No
The introduction made me so sad. There will be no want for beer in heaven, there will only be the presence of God which will fulfill us from any want of material things.
The trolls
Catholics always seem to ignore John 6:35. For people who claim to have the fullness of the truth, it is strange how often the truth of that verse gets suppressed.
That changes nothing
@@guh3777, you can just ignore that it says the context of John 6 is not literally eating bread and literally drinking wine as you do at eucharist, but remember that you then are telling God the Son that you'll be ignoring Him to listen to your "church". That's fine, you can choose to do that, but don't think for a moment that that decision won't have consequences.