Guestsplaining 012: Bishop Barron on the Eucharist
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
- Guestsplaining 012: Bishop Barron on the Eucharist
@BishopBarron joins Fr. Gregory Pine and Fr. Jacob Bertrand Janczyk to discuss living our faith in a polarized society and his book on the Eucharist.
Support the Podcast-
Patreon- www.patreon.com/godsplaining?...
Shop our store- godsplaining.bigcartel.com/
Check out St. Dominic's Way of Life, a book written by Fr. Patrick Briscoe and Fr. Jacob Bertrand Janczyk-
www.amazon.com/Saint-Dominics...
Connect on Social Media-
Follow us on Instagram- godsplainin...
Like us on Facebook- godsplaining...
Follow us on Twitter- godsplaining...
See more from Bishop Barron-
Word on Fire- www.wordonfire...
Bishop Barron's book on the Eucharist- bookstore.word...
![ทางเดินชีวิต - ธีเดช ทองอภิชาติ x อ.ไข่ มาลีฮวนน่า [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1f3wcG16dd4/mqdefault.jpg)
![จบจนได้ ! | Black Myth: Wukong #007 [ตอนจบ?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DSqvWndF0sw/mqdefault.jpg)
I don't think there is anyone who makes Catholicism as appealing as Bishop Barron. In just a few short months, he has drawn me in. Starting RCIA this week. Nice podcast, Fathers!
Praise be to God!
beware appeal - can start out with such good intention, and then become what misleads good souls with half truths.
@@maggiesace389 ?
Bishop Barron is ok. I am a traditionalist, so I am not the biggest fan.
Bishop Baron appears to be a heretic. He doesn’t seem to believe that anyone actually goes to hell.
This was so unexpectedly good.
This was just precious. Mature, experienced Bishop Barron and these two young, brilliant and obviously in love with the Lord priests. A joyful 30 minutes.
It's very amusing to see Fr Gregory Pine smile whenever Bishop Barron make a direct reference to Aquina's teaching. Great reactions!
Fr Pine, don't be discouraged! I think you speak well in all your various videos and with intelligence and wit. I always find you have good points to ponder and reflect. But for this video, Bishop Barron just bring a lump to my throat when he said the Eucharist is Ipse Christus and continue expounding on it. For some of us in Asia who have missed the Eucharist for months because of COVID, it just opened up such a longing for Him.
Really appreciate this video.
Fr. Pine and Bishop Barron. Crossing the streams 😳
Good show, gentlemen. Prayers for you your Excellency. Still praying for you and your family Fr. Pine.
I admit for years I thought the Eucharist was symbolic...boy was I wrong.
The explanation of the self invention culture was solid. Thanks for the content. Subd!
Thank you! Happy to hear you enjoyed the episode!
I love he speaks about St Thomas like he is almost a Dominican. one of my favourite episodes 🙏.
This is fantastic. Engage without compromising. I commend Bishop Barron for his efforts. God bless you all.
My best two evangelists coming together. What a gift to the church this is :) thank you
Very encouraging indeed Fr. Pine. Thank you Bishop Barron for and Dominicans for all the work that you do :)
I love bishop barron's rants :D
I love how the good bishop encouraged you all to do what you do, preach the truth, boldly and clearly. Fr. Pine, the regular Catholics in the pews desperately need your good preaching to continue to convert our hearts, minds and souls. The generation before you all were badly formed in the faith. We need your preaching and teaching.
Virginia, while I agree, there has been formation with holes or misdirections, do you really think that these men could be who they are without having been led by well-formed, faithful men and women of the faith? Don't despair of everyone formed in the generation before. Thank God for the ones rightly formed and faithful; thank Christ for being the Truth and the Light that led them and "this generation" to the joy that we know and in Whom we have our hope. Pax Christi.
The Dominican Third Order (Lay Fraternities) is doing some great work in the space where the First Order is not present. As Bishop says now is the time for the Dominican family. Preaching and teaching through a Thomistic lens is distinct and powerful and needed in this age. Another great episode!
Interesting episode! I appreciated Bishop Barron's idea of this period being a "Dominican moment" and incorporating the question, "Yes, but is it true?" in all of our dialogues/engagements with others.
well i did not expect to see father gregory pine and bishop barron in one video..great discussion
I rediscovered the Eucharist through the TLM. There’s such a strong connection when there’s nothing but you and direct line with the altar of sacrifice praying WITH the priest with your eyes, your heart and your mind in full focus. To receive in the humble presence of kneeling while receiving the body of Christ that is only touch the hands of the priest whom represents Christ. There is Truth in the practice.
The Church is the One, the True, the Good, and the Beautiful.
Excellent discussion! Beautiful points made by Bishop Barron. Thanks to him and to you, Fathers!
Wow…this is quite a trinity of holy men 🙏🏻👏🏻💫🤩
Incredible interview! It truly inspired me to hear that the most popular video of Bishop Barron is the one on the eucharist. No better example of people's desire for Christ❤️
God bless you all and thank you so much for this magnificent work you do!
Thank you so much, Luisa!
This is great - a combination of my two favourite Catholic evangelist channels.
Fascinating to hear about the video of Bishop Barron’s talk on the Eucharist having so many views. I’ve watched it (more than once) and I can totally see why. The truth about the Real Presence is just that compelling!
Amazing interview. The combination of the coolness of the Thomistic Institute and Bishop Barron is very formidable.
God bless.
Terrific interview.
Without Bishop Baron I would (probably) not have St Thomas Aquinas in my life.
Once I started searching out everything I could on this great DR of the Church I landed (of course) on the page of the TI and all of those wonderful videos and the preaching of The Dominicans and voila! Here I am on the Godsplaining page
🙌🏼🙏.
Thank you Bishop Barron!
So good!
Biology major, butterfly fan. I've entertained the thought of the Eucharist, as edible essence of Jesus, the spiritual food necessary to sustain us throughout the pupate state, the waiting. If we do not have the Christ infused within us, one and the same, we shall not be recognized to God. I also trust in Divine Mercy. So I'm doubly covered👍🏻🙏.
Amazing discussion! Thank you Fathers & Bishop, praying for your respective vocations always 🙏🏼
This was so wonderful!
Thanks so much for all you
Great crossover! Thankful you got Bishop Barron on the show.
Wow! Thomistic institute and word on fire...sun and fire. Great to see everyone forging ahead for the presence in eucharist (1.2 m and counting views for word on fire). Great work everyone! Godbless Bishop Barron and the Order of Preachers. Wonderful.
All my 3 daughters and son went to Order of Preachers run schools and universities here (OP noble work in the Philippines)... theology subjects are included in the curricula for all university courses...architecture, accountancy, psychology and business. Thank you OP...congratulations for the 800Yrs. God bless fr. Pine. Work work work. Amen.
Fathers, thank you for your ministry. It’s a great blessing. Binge-listening on your podcasts on spotify. God bless youuuuu.
Amazing!
Thank you so much! God bless you all. 😊
Thank you; much to think about, Pax.
Thank you for this important presentation.
I taught RE during the past several years. I would like to teach about sacramental graces...The things you expressed are imperatives.
Now l am basically the prayer lady.The Church is truth and the source of salvation.
These three are awesome 🙏🏼
Yes, we need to hear the Truth. Truth is attractive.... So, just do it (proclaim the Truth with much charity) 🙏 I pray for you, for your fidelity til the end. 🙏
I love his excellency throwing in a solid Shia LaBeouf meme reference at the end. 😂🤣😂
[ ▼ Guestsplaining 012: Bishop Barron on the Eucharist | Timestamps ▼ ]
00:00 Introduction and quick catch-up with Fr. Gregory Pine and Fr. Jacob Bertrand Janczyk
01:23 Our guest today: Bishop Robert Barron
02:00 Catching up with Bishop Barron, the new Eucharist book, and Word on Fire ministry
05:02 | Q1:
Many people find it discouraging when we are seen as assuming a political, polemical, or polarized caricature of Catholic life and worship. How do you maintain and grow the integrity of your apostolate (in your mission in Word on Fire and what you do) in this kind of environment?
08:59 | Q2:
In relation to engaging with modernity, how much should we be reading the signs of the times (e.g: the Church's stance in relation to secular modernity)? What do you see as avenues or areas where we can continue to preach charitably but also boldly without being overrun by everything else?
14:22 | Q3:
In place of this culture of self-invention, how do we receive our identity? What does it mean to recover an identity/tradition in a way that is organic, sincere, and good?
19:14 Short break + second intro
20:28 | Q4: How does revisiting the teaching of the Eucharist helpful, both for the faithful currently navigating present difficulties and for those not within the fold?
26:20 | Q5:
Based in the recent edition of the catechism, we call the Eucharist as "source and summit". In your book, you give an alternate translation of "fount and apex".
What is at stake when we call the Eucharist as "source and summit" or "fount and apex"? What is the faith that informs that profession and how can we appropriate that profession better?
28:09 | Q6:
In regards to your book of the Eucharist and our conversations, what are your tips on helping people be more drawn into the reality of our faith and Church in such a polarized world?
31:00 Remarks on the correspondence between the mysteries as they are preached and the reception of the faithful
32:07 Word on Fire video on Eucharist and book sale
32:33 Godsplaining announcements and closing remarks
Been a long time since I listened to you guys and Bshp Barron. Been on the mad trad side of things for a while. I do appreciate what was said here
Loved the discussion in general, but my favorite thing was the fact that Bishop Barron said that the Dominican habit is cute, I think he’s right, it’s very cute indeed and also looks very high maintenance, a combo that shows the reality that most be confronted when working the faith.
I’m here trying to win the book on the Eucharist. ❤️🔥
👏👏👏👏👏❤❤❤🙏
THE OATH AGAINST MODERNISM
To be sworn to by all clergy, pastors, confessors, preachers, religious superiors, and professors in philosophical-theological seminaries.
I . . . . firmly embrace and accept each and every definition that has been set forth and declared by the unerring teaching authority of the Church, especially those principal truths which are directly opposed to the errors of this day. And first of all, I profess that God, the origin and end of all things, can be known with certainty by the natural light of reason from the created world (see Rom. 1:19), that is, from the visible works of creation, as a cause from its effects, and that, therefore, his existence can also be demonstrated: Secondly, I accept and acknowledge the external proofs of revelation, that is, divine acts and especially miracles and prophecies as the surest signs of the divine origin of the Christian religion and I hold that these same proofs are well adapted to the understanding of all eras and all men, even of this time. Thirdly, I believe with equally firm faith that the Church, the guardian and teacher of the revealed word, was personally instituted by the real and historical Christ when he lived among us, and that the Church was built upon Peter, the prince of the apostolic hierarchy, and his successors for the duration of time. Fourthly, I sincerely hold that the doctrine of faith was handed down to us from the apostles through the orthodox Fathers in exactly the same meaning and always in the same purport. Therefore, I entirely reject the heretical’ misrepresentation that dogmas evolve and change from one meaning to another different from the one which the Church held previously. I also condemn every error according to which, in place of the divine deposit which has been given to the spouse of Christ to be carefully guarded by her, there is put a philosophical figment or product of a human conscience that has gradually been developed by human effort and will continue to develop indefinitely. Fifthly, I hold with certainty and sincerely confess that faith is not a blind sentiment of religion welling up from the depths of the subconscious under the impulse of the heart and the motion of a will trained to morality; but faith is a genuine assent of the intellect to truth received by hearing from an external source. By this assent, because of the authority of the supremely truthful God, we believe to be true that which has been revealed and attested to by a personal God, our Creator and Lord.
Furthermore, with due reverence, I submit and adhere with my whole heart to the condemnations, declarations, and all the prescripts contained in the encyclical Pascendi and in the decree Lamentabili, especially those concerning what is known as the history of dogmas. I also reject the error of those who say that the faith held by the Church can contradict history, and that Catholic dogmas, in the sense in which they are now understood, are irreconcilable with a more realistic view of the origins of the Christian religion. I also condemn and reject the opinion of those who say that a well-educated Christian assumes a dual personality-that of a believer and at the same time of a historian, as if it were permissible for a historian to hold things that contradict the faith of the believer, or to establish premises which, provided there be no direct denial of dogmas, would lead to the conclusion that dogmas are either false or doubtful. Likewise, I reject that method of judging and interpreting Sacred Scripture which, departing from the tradition of the Church, the analogy of faith, and the norms of the Apostolic See, embraces the misrepresentations of the rationalists and with no prudence or restraint adopts textual criticism as the one and supreme norm. Furthermore, I reject the opinion of those who hold that a professor lecturing or writing on a historico-theological subject should first put aside any preconceived opinion about the supernatural origin of Catholic tradition or about the divine promise of help to preserve all revealed truth forever; and that they should then interpret the writings of each of the Fathers solely by scientific principles, excluding all sacred authority, and with the same liberty of judgment that is common in the investigation of all ordinary historical documents.
Finally, I declare that I am completely opposed to the error of the modernists who hold that there is nothing divine in sacred tradition; or what is far worse, say that there is, but in a pantheistic sense, with the result that there would remain nothing but this plain simple fact-one to be put on a par with the ordinary facts of history-the fact, namely, that a group of men by their own labor, skill, and talent have continued through subsequent ages a school begun by Christ and his apostles. I firmly hold, then, and shall hold to my dying breath the belief of the Fathers in the charism of truth, which certainly is, was, and always will be in the succession of the episcopacy from the apostles. The purpose of this is, then, not that dogma may be tailored according to what seems better and more suited to the culture of each age; rather, that the absolute and immutable truth preached by the apostles from the beginning may never be believed to be different, may never be understood in any other way.
I promise that I shall keep all these articles faithfully, entirely, and sincerely, and guard them inviolate, in no way deviating from them in teaching or in any way in word or in writing. Thus I promise, this I swear, so help me God. . .
Bishop Barron I was sooooo excited to be able to buy The Creed and down load it, the post here is not good.
God bless you we are going to use this in ourConnect Group in Cape Town South Africa.
Everything you say is interesting fr pine. (in response to ur comment that u hope ur audience finds what u find interesting is also interesting)
I would ask you all to pray that the Catholic Church unites to solve the Homelessness/Drug Addiction problems of the world. I would ask that you pray for Religous Orders to unilaterally take this up and thereby rebuild our foundation and reputation in the world. We have built hospitals and schools with God’s help. Pray for God’s help. We need to pay for the disorder we have wrought on the world through the priest sexual abuse scandal. If we helped the world people might give God a second chance and we could save souls. I work in faith formation and young people do not see the church as good. Let’s do good. Let’s show good. God is good yet people cannot see it in priests who don’t repent. We have protected sinners and allowed them to nor repent. PRAY FOR PUBLIC REPENTANCE, VOCATIONS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE.
New subscriber here.
Welcome! Thanks for subscribing
Too short
7:49 I would categorize the two camps as God’s camp vs. the devil’s camp. Which camp are you on? You must hold the true faith of God to be in His camp. If you hold the wrong faith, you will not be doing God’s will. If you aren’t doing God’s will, then who’s will are you doing? Most people are led astray by wolves in sheep’s clothing! Most “bishops” are not true bishops and are leading you to the devil in hell. Be careful! Pray to God the Holy Spirit for His graces. And pray to Mary to help mediate God’s graces to you! Pray the Rosary daily!
8:59 A primary job of the bishops is to admonish sinners. He is afraid of the consequences of admonition of others, lest he sell fewer books. He’s leaving out critical parts of the Gospel that the devil doesn’t want us to know. Stop reading Barron’s books! Read a Douay-Rheims Bible instead and pray your Rosary daily. Prayer from your home is often more efficacious than going out into the world. God is far more powerful and intelligent than us. Pray to Him for help and guidance. If you are blessed with a priest who holds the true faith (are there any?), then you can heed their advice, but most priests I’ve found are essentially Protestants who think they are Catholic. Barron is a Protestant.
5:46 Social Justice *is* too liberal, and prayer actually works.
Fr. Pine: So, here's a question
Bishop Barron: Bruh, do you even read Aquinas?
5:20 Look to God and His Mother for hope; not Antibishop Barron
6:58 Antipope John Paul II was no saint! Don’t lump him in with real saints! What apostasy! What blasphemy!
We have united the Church to heresies through the teachings of the questionable council.
Does Bishop Barron even know that meal theology is Protestant?
Then let Thomas Aquinas know that, too, because that idea is one that he promoted too.
The new Mass took out everything that was Catholic and put in a bunch that is Protestant. Aquinas said the Gregorian Mass, not this Cramner little supper service with a circus atmosphere.
@@curiouschris98 No he did not. He taught that the Mass is the unbloody sacrifice of the cross.
@@carolynkimberly4021 Indeed he did, but he also taught that the Eucharist can be understood as an allegory for food. A spiritual food. One that sustains us throughout our lives so that we can make it on the journey spiritually. That in no way contradicts the sacrificial nature of the Eucharist at all. It’s just another way of understanding it’s practical purpose in our lives. Bishop Barron acknowledges and widely promotes the sacrificial nature and purpose of the Eucharist. I’ve watched many hours of Bishop Barron’s videos and trust me, he roots his theological thinking primarily with Scripture, Thomas Aquinas, and the Church Fathers.
@@curiouschris98 Of course, Holy Viaticum is our food for the journey and the EUCHARIST is the Bread of Life. But the primary purpose of the Mass is to offer right worship to God, not for us to receive Communion. The priest offers the sacrifice and consumes it as in the temple sacrifices. The new Mass is all about the congregation as it is in Protestantism. I grew up with the Mass of antiquity. Bishop Barron can only look at it as a stranger. I know it from the inside.
Bishop Barron is a soft Modernist.
And you will be condemned for speaking badly of priests. Worry more about your soul and less about him.
This affinity for denunciation you incessantly exhibit looks to be more than a mere speck in your eye.
The light of Christ be with you, amen
@@halleylujah247 Instead of attacking her personally, why don't you ask her why she said what she said?
@@ironymatt Instead of attacking her personally, why don't you ask her why she said what she said?
@@polemeros Why do you consider my observation of her calumnous posts - not only here but many other places throughout these comments - to be an attack?
Do you agree with the things she is saying?
Do you think she is conducting herself in a manner Jesus desires of His followers?
Think about it. We are being led by bishops who were never taught the Faith, who were never schooled in the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas, who never heard of transubstantiation. All they know is V2 which is not in line with what has been passed down everywhere and at all times until 1965. I can't relate to this imposter.
You are speaking out of ignorance and being presumptuous as well. Ease off of the sensational Catholic channels. Maybe go outside or read a book.
I ask you, how much about Bishop Barron and his educational background do you know, because I assure you he knows more Thomas Aquinas than you or I ever will combined.
@@halleylujah247 Instead of attacking her personally, why don't you ask her why she said what she said?
@@curiouschris98 Instead of attacking her personally, why don't you ask her why she said what she said?
@@polemeros I wasn’t attacking her personally, as I made no direct judgment on her as a person not her motives. I am merely questioning how much she actually knows about Bishop Barron, his work, and his educational background, because from her comment it’s pretty clear she knows very little, as watching even a few videos of his shows knowledge of Aquinas is vast and with little equal. I’m merely bringing to light the ignorance of her statement. As was clearly stated, she’s clearly being presumptuous. Now, I can’t know how much of Aquinas she herself knows, but I am almost certain Barron has her clearly outgunned in that department.
Be careful with hosting Bishop Barron. He sometimes seems to veer from orthodox Catholic teaching.
Show me precisely where I veer from orthodoxy.
I just unsubscribed; my reason? Your willingness to promote Barrons. Good luck.