Why Overturning Chevron Was A Fantastic Supreme Court Ruling: Steve Forbes

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
  • Steve Forbes explains why the Supreme Court striking down Chevron Deference was a fantastic move.
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes.com/membership...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

ความคิดเห็น • 689

  • @johnthompson6656
    @johnthompson6656 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +44

    As long as politicians get their kickbacks and lobbyists cash they'll let anyone call the shots.

    • @iseeyoo9729
      @iseeyoo9729 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      🎯

  • @ohfour-seven6228
    @ohfour-seven6228 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +59

    Perfect example why we need only public funding for campaigns. Take the political control away from the donors and back into the hands of the people.

    • @teddyjackson1902
      @teddyjackson1902 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Nonsense

    • @michaelsheahan2795
      @michaelsheahan2795 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Which means striking down citizens United. Yep. Good luck with a money grubbing supreme Court.

    • @Frodojack
      @Frodojack 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Sure, let's increase the national debt by another few $ trillion.

    • @mchrysogelos7623
      @mchrysogelos7623 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      YES!!!

    • @guttergadgetzz6193
      @guttergadgetzz6193 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Frodojackthank Biden ❤️

  • @RobertRodriguez-rl1rp
    @RobertRodriguez-rl1rp 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +87

    It's not the blind leading the blind it's the corrupt leading the blind 😮

    • @aaronfreeman5264
      @aaronfreeman5264 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Are yu familiar with the term "Judas Goat?"

  • @mitzi1905
    @mitzi1905 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +122

    Congress needs to do the job and not give it to big corporations to do the job for them.

    • @curly__3
      @curly__3 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

      Congress' job is to keep government lean and small. They aren't too good at that...

    • @CarmieThompson
      @CarmieThompson 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You didn't listen to the video. Mr. Forbes didn't say anything of the sort. It's the bureaucrats who have their own agenda & instead of going to a vote in Congress will curry favor by Gov't. agencies to enact their 'wish list'. The biggest abuser of their Office is the EPA & the CDC. Like Mr. Forbes said, it costs the American People & Businesses $T's a year. Has nothing to do w/ corporations getting their 'way'. That's whiner talk.

    • @trentp151
      @trentp151 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The People of this country are the problem. They continually vote for politicians who promise to use government in a manner other than that which the Founding Fathers designed it to do. The ENTIRE 4th branch of government, the administrative state, the alphabet soup, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and should not even exist. The THREE branches defined in the US Constitution can do everything that our federal government was designed to do. This unconstitutional 4th branch of government was designed to funnel all of your money into projects that benefit the rich and powerful, and I don't think anyone can reasonably say that they all still serve any other purpose than unconstitutional control of the economy and the People of this country.

    • @claycoates5056
      @claycoates5056 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      Defend the Congress and DO not Allow the CORP. Big wigs to wright laws

    • @user-xd9wd6kg8i
      @user-xd9wd6kg8i 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The whole system is corrupt and that is why I don't support any political party

  • @debbieluna2967
    @debbieluna2967 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +47

    The power should be with the people. Term limits needed. And WEF needs out if power. Tyranny is rampant in government

    • @douglaskaye1395
      @douglaskaye1395 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      @@debbieluna2967 term limits is a huge priority

    • @williamk2257
      @williamk2257 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      All you people bitch about the EPA but when your water is undrinkable from one of our industries mainly big oil or chemical companies like this forever chemical who do you call??

    • @huemann7637
      @huemann7637 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@williamk2257you think the EPA is protecting you from forever chemicals? I have bad news for you…

    • @JakMakes-z5o
      @JakMakes-z5o 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      "How can you protest police corruption and actions because if your house got broken into, who would you call?" Are you serious?

  • @michah321
    @michah321 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +56

    That whole thing that the EPA was going to ban gas cars all on their own without legislation was a bridge too far.

    • @JerryS-zb2lf
      @JerryS-zb2lf 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      we have 80 years left of oil

    • @michah321
      @michah321 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

      @@JerryS-zb2lf who said?

    • @webportal6659
      @webportal6659 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      ​@JerryS-zb2lf Even if that true, so what?

    • @claycoates5056
      @claycoates5056 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@JerryS-zb2lf HUH ? bet you can not Show those numbers In Fact I know you can NOT oil is not fossils or old DINOSAURS I made a statement now prove me wrong

    • @JerryS-zb2lf
      @JerryS-zb2lf 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@claycoates5056 I can show those numbers, we have 565 billion barrels left a US geological survey showed in 2012, we use 20 million or so A DAY, we're running out. You need to check the numbers simply google what I've said.

  • @docsavage5063
    @docsavage5063 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +17

    Time for congress to actually get off its butt and do the job they were hired to do.... legislate, not pass the buck to unelected agencies.
    It would be great if everyone passing the laws were experts, but that is not how the constitution is written...but that should not stop congress from consulting with the experts and then passing the needed laws.
    We need to be holding congresses feet to the fire to make sure they are doing their jobs.

    • @guyindecatur
      @guyindecatur 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Cool it with the antisemitism, broh! /s

    • @miriamloya6038
      @miriamloya6038 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Good luck getting Congress to corporate enough to actually legislate…

  • @debbie5728
    @debbie5728 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +65

    “Experts” such as “energy expert” Jennifer Granholm” wanting to ban all forms of existing energy sources and infrastructure, other than what affects her gazillion dollars on shares, and chairmanship other Proterra EV battery bus manufacturer?

    •  27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      No. They don't. Explain where you got your information.

    • @JakMakes-z5o
      @JakMakes-z5o 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      expert just means an academic that politically and ideologically aligns with the ruling party.

    •  26 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Expert is someone that spent their life learning about a subject. Until they knew more than almost anyone else. A lifetime of study and experience. That is an expert. Not someone like you that's barely finished high school and works in a warehouse.

    • @EXRazeBurn
      @EXRazeBurn 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Now it's done by a judge that absolutely has no idea about anything other than basic law mandates and will side with whichever lobbyist provides the biggest bribe.
      HUUUUUGE improvement

  • @gloriaescano2417
    @gloriaescano2417 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +78

    Wow, the best ruling the Supreme Court did. Thank you.

    •  27 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

      The best think is taking away your protection for safe food, for clean water and for unpolluted air is the best thing ever?
      How much does Forbes pay you?

    • @guyindecatur
      @guyindecatur 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Found the rabbi.

    • @hubertwalters4300
      @hubertwalters4300 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This ruling on Chevron Deference didn't do that,it left in place all of the rules and regulations made under Chevron Deference before this new ruling,I remember when there was no Chevron Deference, the Clean Air Act was being enforced and the rivers, Iakes and streams were being cleaned up and any rules or regulations put into effect before this new ruling remains in effect,anything new will have to be written up in legislation by Congress in a clear,concise manner which is what Congress was supposed to be doing to start with,if Congress needs help they can have public hearings and call experts to testify and then decide which experts opinions they will go with when they write legislation.

  • @dboy6400
    @dboy6400 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +33

    The Constitution is perhaps the wisest document ever written.

    • @Goldenhour24
      @Goldenhour24 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It used to be the court decided it was going to rewrite it

  • @kimthibeau8354
    @kimthibeau8354 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +39

    I live in Connecticut and I have a client who is a fisherman buddy year ago he told me about this and honestly I thought he was exaggerating I couldn’t imagine that the government with mandate fisherman to have to pay for a “” observer on their boat who in the hell thought that was a good idea

    • @industrialathlete6096
      @industrialathlete6096 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      "Who in the Hell thought that was a good idea"The 'Administrative' state members and the Deap State(swamp)!!

    • @astronautical1082
      @astronautical1082 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Bad actors destroy entire fisheries. That is the problem, not regulating them out of that result.

    • @pindapoy1596
      @pindapoy1596 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @kimthibeau8354 You are going a little too fast. While one can agree that bureaucrats should not be ruling and the controlling agencies should not be creating work for themselves, a different problem is being created by letting loose corporate power.
      Ask Boeing about the missing bolts or rivets and what the FAA did in the past about it even when a semblance of regulation was in place.
      Now, the industry will be free to do as they please and nobody will regulate the trains that get off the rails or the airplane doors that fly out.
      The flood gates have been opened, profit yes; public interest can wait.
      It is ridiculous to assume that private corporations will self regulate without looking at the bottom line first.

    • @MaximusHawkwing
      @MaximusHawkwing 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

      ​@@pindapoy1596 how does this prevent regulation? It puts the power to interpret laws back in the hands of the judicial branch, where it was supposed to be as per the constitution. The idea that only the bureaucrats can protect us from the corporations is laughable, especially when these agencies are littered with former executives from the very corporations they're supposed to be regulating.

    • @Achonas
      @Achonas 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@pindapoy1596 nice to see you literally didn't even watch the video.

  • @nicres
    @nicres 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +70

    For rich people, of course 🙄
    Us poor people are fed up. Your days are numbered, Forbes

  • @heavyd777
    @heavyd777 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +20

    So basically the EPA cannot simply ban gas appliances. Maybe now they have to also give up all their weapons as well.
    Same for the IRS.

    • @vikinglife6316
      @vikinglife6316 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Exactly.

    • @cd0130
      @cd0130 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hopefully. Irs,dea,fbi,atf shouldn't be killing Americans over unpaid taxes

  • @zacharyepps6683
    @zacharyepps6683 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Pond, creeks, and mud puddles? As someone who has to define what a federally navigable waterway is for my job. We have not and never will define a navigable waterway as such. Where did he even get that statement from?

    • @hubertwalters4300
      @hubertwalters4300 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      That term, navigable waterway was in the regulations the federal government was pushing to justify regulating the ponds,creeks and mud puddles on your property,that was a bridge too far and it was ridiculous.

    • @marilyn8490
      @marilyn8490 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Because he does not know people who actually have expertise and do such jobs...

  • @JK-ks3xq
    @JK-ks3xq 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +33

    Most people have no idea how big this is. Sad to say.....

    • @guyindecatur
      @guyindecatur 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My chy goze to a goot pulic skoo..

  • @jesusmartinez4788
    @jesusmartinez4788 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Thanks Steve! Appreciate your insights.

  • @douglaskaye1395
    @douglaskaye1395 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +87

    I’ve been screaming about this unconditionally power grab for years amen

    • @franksullivan1873
      @franksullivan1873 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

      Me too.

    •  27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You're talking about a group of five proven liars that sold themselves to billionaires for an RV or a fishing trip, running everything that protects us is a good idea you've thought about for years? You really think anyone thinks you are anything but a shill for Forbes?

    • @RM-nd7gn
      @RM-nd7gn 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      Can we get back the money spent on student loans? I paid for mine they should to. FJB.

    • @DaTooch_e
      @DaTooch_e 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

      Who needs scientific expert advice? Judges need vacations and gratuities.

    • @DaTooch_e
      @DaTooch_e 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      @@RM-nd7gn can people start paying their fair share of taxes? I had to pay mine.

  • @r.o.y8940
    @r.o.y8940 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +34

    We are guaranteed in writing enshrined in our constitution that we will always be a Republic as stated by article 4 section 2 of the u.s. constitution during the constitutional convention in Philadelphia between May and September 1796 the delegates argued long and hard about what form of government the new nation should take. The article of confederation that had governed the United States after the Revolutionary war ended had created a very weak central government that had no power to manage trade print a single currency or pass or enforce laws that all the States would universally agree to. It was a nation on the verge of collapse that sounds familiar huh?. I could go on . You can read this yourself I read the whole dam thing all their arguments . Ask yourself how you did we get here!

    •  27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Forbes thinks fascism and a dictator are better. That's why they bought the SCOTUS.

    • @universumaeternalisfirmus
      @universumaeternalisfirmus 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Clearly that means nothing

    • @Protect_all_ljf3forms
      @Protect_all_ljf3forms 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The would be nobility dislikes that fact

    • @beastfromthemiddleeast6369
      @beastfromthemiddleeast6369 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Do you even know what a republic is and the difference between a republic and democracy?

    • @guyindecatur
      @guyindecatur 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@beastfromthemiddleeast6369 The word "democracy" is rooted in the Greek word literally meaning "mob rule."
      You can keep your mob rule, Shaqueefa!

  • @wasntmeXYZ
    @wasntmeXYZ 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +141

    Just like the ATF has been writing their own rules but no more!!!
    FJB!

    • @Trilobite45
      @Trilobite45 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ATF has been making their own laws & pretending they are lawmakers when they are tools to effect laws.

    • @michaelfrock2473
      @michaelfrock2473 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +15

      @@colettekatz1471only if you hate the constitution and don’t mind people you didn’t elect telling you want you can and can’t do.

    • @steveb796
      @steveb796 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Now Hunter Biden can be exonerated .

    • @SSTupperware
      @SSTupperware 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      What they wrote needs to be rolled back.

    • @JerryS-zb2lf
      @JerryS-zb2lf 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      forbes is a talking republican head, nothin he said is accurate and all of it paid for.

  • @fev_yt
    @fev_yt 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    so experts will have no saying in their fields and instead, politicians will determine wether something is good or bad. How this is a good thing?

    • @fev_yt
      @fev_yt 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      nvm this means asbeston is back in our water LET'S GOOOOOOOOOO

    • @betterknownasregina
      @betterknownasregina 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It's NOT a good thing. Smh

  • @trentp151
    @trentp151 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +27

    Need to shut down the entire 4th branch of government and bring back the THREE branches as defined in the US Constitution. Executive branch, Judicial branch, and Legislative branch. These THREE branches SHOULD be able to do everything that our federal government was designed to do.

    • @ThePoehladian
      @ThePoehladian 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      🎯

    • @havanamarlena
      @havanamarlena 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@trentp151 Absolutely!

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      It’s almost like the Founding Fathers didn’t have much of a concept for actually running a modern country and were instead stuck in an agrarian mindset…
      Why establish rules for educating the populace if there’s no real concept of public education to start??

    • @trentp151
      @trentp151 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@nenafan1 You fundamentally misunderstand what it means to run the country, as per the US Constitution. You might read it one day, and you could enlighten yourself as to the very limited scope that the Founding Fathers intended, and rightfully so. Adding all this extra crap onto what government "needs to do" has created a $34 trillion dollar hole in our great-great-great grandchildren's pockets (if this country lasts this long, and it won't last much longer if we continue to allow the 4th branch of government to exist).
      Plus, taxation is theft, but property taxation is slavery. Alphabet agencies NEED TO GO.

  • @Adehead
    @Adehead 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    So many people do not know the importance of Chevron thank you for trying to educate about this amazing ruling. Regular local news doesn’t cover important changes.

  • @kennethfarthing1474
    @kennethfarthing1474 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    What does this mean for code enforcement ?

  • @gpslightlock1422
    @gpslightlock1422 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +48

    Thank you Mr. Forbes for bringing us information we'll never get from MSM.

    •  27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      Ya, lies and propaganda are much better than facts and freedom.

    • @nicres
      @nicres 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Because how he’s spinning it is disingenuous and they try to avoid that

  • @rogermitchell3166
    @rogermitchell3166 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +52

    Steve is right

    •  27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      More shills for your friend ---Steve?

    • @scottlocke3645
      @scottlocke3645 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Steve has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. He doesn't give 2 sh#ts about the future.

  • @Nonononono12345-o
    @Nonononono12345-o 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +65

    The EPA is a prime offender

    • @douglaskaye1395
      @douglaskaye1395 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Nonononono12345-o hell the FCC has been grabbing tax dollars by calling that $hit fees. Only congress can tax!!!

    • @rocketmans3603
      @rocketmans3603 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

      The original EPA mission was to stop the river in Cleveland from periodically catching fire and bring Lake Erie back to life. That goal was accomplished in about 8 years. At which point they had to start justifying their existence by finding other things to "fix". God help us.

    • @sassyfrass4295
      @sassyfrass4295 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      all Agencies were created to implement UN Governance. These Agencies and even your Local Gov are implementing Sustainable Development in a Sovereign Nation - its Treason really. Once again thank democrats Woodrow Wilson and FDR .

    • @franksullivan1873
      @franksullivan1873 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      I like having a think tank to solve problems,I just think laws are made by Congress and Courts interpret those laws when in conflict.Agencies can be cut in half and still deliver data to Congress to make laws concerning the needs of the public.If Congress wants rules they gotta do the work.We have 15 departments and 436 agencies…which could be cut in half or just done away with.Big Government is sucking the life out of the country and running up debt.

    • @Nonononono12345-o
      @Nonononono12345-o 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@franksullivan1873 yes

  • @owest4008
    @owest4008 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +30

    The EPA carry sniping rifles. That says it all.

    • @guyindecatur
      @guyindecatur 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Bathhouse Barry weaponized most every federal agency. As many as 15,000 invaders cross into our country on a daily basis.

  • @5deuces
    @5deuces 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    What Mr. Steve Forbes is saying here, is that poor people do not need the Environmental Protection Agency or any other Consumer protection agency, because they are not profitable. And by the time the House of Representatives figures out how to re-regulate industry, we will have all been Quick-Fried to a Crackly crunch by Global Warming!
    Thanks Steve, by the way, do you have any sun tan lotion we could borrow?

  • @Trilobite45
    @Trilobite45 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    Chevron erased. Just in time as what’s next? Plutonium & Cesium declared GRAS?

    • @sirdiealot53
      @sirdiealot53 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Whoa whoa whoa what did cesium ever do to anyone lol it ain’t naturally radioactive

    • @Trilobite45
      @Trilobite45 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@sirdiealot53 oops. Caesium-137

  • @conrioakfield414
    @conrioakfield414 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +41

    What is better? Having experts make policy decisions in a given area, or elected officials ignorant of just about everything?

    • @user-zn6qh8ur8b
      @user-zn6qh8ur8b 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

      You mean " Experts " like Fauci ?!?

    • @user-ef4cg5xy4c
      @user-ef4cg5xy4c 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Elected officials.

    • @rainedyani8505
      @rainedyani8505 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I’m split on this. I know there’s rampant corruption in the alphabet agencies, however, I’m pro environment and can see where this ruling could be completely devastating, but I’m also anti Fauci and CDC/Big Pharma and can see where it could be GOOD.

    • @DaveSmith-pm2yq
      @DaveSmith-pm2yq 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-zn6qh8ur8b This is exactly what has led to corporate capture of government agencies.
      We elect the politicians. They can listen to the experts what to write laws. But we can at least vote them out when they do things we don't like.
      If they write a law and the unelected bigshots can make it mean what they want it to mean.
      They can mess us over much easier.
      Less than 20 years ago the Dems would be cheering this decision, and the Bush republicans would be screaming.
      The so called experts end up being the same people that sat on the big boards of the massive companies 5 minutes ago. And when they leave they go right back on.

    • @johnu5285
      @johnu5285 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      So you're pro technocracy?

  • @johnsmith-dz5en
    @johnsmith-dz5en 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +41

    Anything that limits government overreach is A-Ok with me!

    • @user-im8oc4us9p
      @user-im8oc4us9p 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You must not care what poison is in your drinking water or food or the air you must breath.

    • @lynnekenerly4868
      @lynnekenerly4868 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@johnsmith-dz5en You should consider the fact that you food will not be inspected and your air and water will be polluted but go ahead and be ignorant.

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      So just A-ok with corporations clogging up the court system with challenges to specific rules and regulations instead, I assume.
      Not to mention seemingly in favor of lead in the water and all that jazz, since ‘big guv bad.’

    • @charlessansom4849
      @charlessansom4849 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@nenafan1You write as if there are no longer going to be any regulations at all. What there won’t be is the myriad of frivolous regulations designed only to garner excessive power and enrich the corporation. We had plenty of sensible regulation before Chevron. Sensible regulation will still rule. Don’t claim the sky is falling when it isn’t.

  • @okbob8147
    @okbob8147 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    3 Seperate but Equal Branches

  • @alee2969
    @alee2969 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +25

    All good points

  • @XvaleckX
    @XvaleckX 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +40

    It is amazing to watch people cheer this knowing how much damage is going to be done.

    • @chrisd3884
      @chrisd3884 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      This decision has ended the illegal administrative state's ability to interpret and write law without congressional approval! It takes away the deep state's ability to circumvent and violate the Constitution and our rights through an illegal, unelected administrative branch of corrupt government. There are only three (3) branches of government. The administrative state is not one of them. Educate yourself! 🤬 ⚖️ 🇺🇲

    • @Lenevor
      @Lenevor 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      ?

    • @heavyd777
      @heavyd777 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Yeah, ?

    • @pamelawise1203
      @pamelawise1203 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      We're finally allowed to fix the damage!!

  • @JumpingJack6
    @JumpingJack6 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +69

    This was a great decision!!!!!!! This court is slowly returning us to the real meaning and spirit of the constitution.

    • @PattyGramsof2
      @PattyGramsof2 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      It really was. I’m so glad that he explained it. I’ve been looking for a good explanation all week. Between all of them I’ve got a grasp on it

    • @CrudeLuthier
      @CrudeLuthier 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      which is that all-powerful kings are awesome to have! We can only be truly free when there is a great iron fist running everything with greatness to own the libs!

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The ‘real spirit and meaning’ that unelected and uneducated judges makes decisions about how much lead in water is acceptable?

  • @LipstickNsofrito
    @LipstickNsofrito 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

    Everyone..have a wonderful day..blessings and much love to you all ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

    • @prestonarmer277
      @prestonarmer277 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Bot

    • @barbarasieg1801
      @barbarasieg1801 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Will you pray for the mother that died out side a hospital because Roe was over turned, Doctors would not help her so they told her to leave the hospital and she died in the parking lot.

    • @LipstickNsofrito
      @LipstickNsofrito 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@barbarasieg1801 prayers & Positive vibes

  • @davidneidel436
    @davidneidel436 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +23

    Those who can't do the work, try to regulate those who do the job.

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Why exactly would a scientist trained to determine nutrition be working in a food factory on the line, for example?
      Your ‘quip’ makes no sense

    • @davidneidel436
      @davidneidel436 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@nenafan1 It's an old saying about regulators and workers. Workers do everything that needs to be done to produce a product. Regulators find ways to justify their jobs by finding fault somewhere, even if you do everything perfectly and by the rules

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@davidneidel436
      I know it’s an old adage and it’s a moronic adage.
      Rules change. Conditions change. No one ever does something ‘perfectly.’
      Reality is a touch more complicated than quaint adages from days gone by.

  • @dfenders2
    @dfenders2 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +26

    Thank you for explaining this.

    • @nicres
      @nicres 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      You shouldn’t trust his “explanation”. It leaves a lot of crucial details out, about how this is not a good thing. Don’t be fooled, keep looking into it!

  • @ThomasMitchell-kr8yy
    @ThomasMitchell-kr8yy 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +20

    Thanks for sharing Mr Forbes

  • @daviddorrell5819
    @daviddorrell5819 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great explanation offering clarity in understanding this point of law which has been exploited by bureaucrats to the detriment of our citizenry. It is hoped that this ruling will return us to the time honored standard of laws made by our traditional lawmakers, the elected legislators in Congress who were designated to perform this function.

  • @dougyazell5479
    @dougyazell5479 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    That was a lot of information I like that, Professor Jed rubenfeld from Yale University explains it on his podcast straight down the middle.

  • @uturniaphobic
    @uturniaphobic 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    I bet they ignore the ruling and just keep on what they're doing. Who will stop them?

  • @thomaskaiakapu2672
    @thomaskaiakapu2672 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Open the floodgates to deconstruct the Administrative State! All of the federal agencies need to be overhauled. ATF, EPA, DOI, DOE, FAA, DOD, USDA ,USFS, USFWS, BLM All the federal agencies.

  • @russellbennett8470
    @russellbennett8470 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +25

    We also need a process that holds everyone accountable for breaking laws and rules. Including presidents. Shouldn’t be just a decision away for us to be under a dictatorship

    • @skimask5911
      @skimask5911 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Exactly! Nancy Pelosi should be in prison for insider trading!

    • @just-some-dude
      @just-some-dude 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      And we should call that process "impeachment". I just made that word up, but you can use it for that purpose.

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      @@just-some-dude
      It’s almost like an impeachment is useless unless one side holds a supermajority, given the political climate in the US.
      And of course for one side to hold a supermajority and the other the presidency in and of itself is exceedingly rare…
      So the original point went way over your head, huh?

    • @chrisd3884
      @chrisd3884 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Yes, like 10% for "the big guy!" 🤔

    • @hubertwalters4300
      @hubertwalters4300 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      We have been under a bureaucratic dictatorship by the administrative state for quite some time,and you can't fire them or vote them out of office.

  • @VeniVidiVid
    @VeniVidiVid 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Chevron Deference also ran contrary to English common law presumption of innocence, and the 5th Amendment due process guarantee. Executive agencies would presume guilt, and citizens often could only dispute the charge in a court run by the same regulatory agency that fined them.

  • @enochpage1333
    @enochpage1333 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +26

    No it wasn’t a fantastic decision for Americans but it was fantastic for the huge corporations that don’t want any regulations.

    • @douglaskaye1395
      @douglaskaye1395 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@enochpage1333 wrong the bureaucracy shouldn’t write law. Congress needs to do their job and write law. The 3 letter agencies aren’t law makers or tax writers or anything but paper shufflers who get paid.

    • @OGdadpool
      @OGdadpool 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@douglaskaye1395 corporations aren't people, even if they lobbied enough to have it written into law. These rules and regulations aren't for you, me, or anyone else trying to actually work hard for a living in this country. They're for the rich that are benefiting from this overturn. The rich that want to be able to do whatever they want. Biden should expand and pack the Supreme Court now to at least stop the bleeding of laws that were enacted by the appropriate powers. The current Supreme Court is corrupt, with their eyes on the goal of taking away anything that helps or protects private individuals over corporations and the rich. Go figure they were put into power by someone who's considered to be a rich, shrewd, businessman.

    • @AliceGraham-ig3fv
      @AliceGraham-ig3fv 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Amazing how Forbes misrepresented and people don't get it. Agencies make regulations, not law. Not the same.

  • @fishn2death
    @fishn2death 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I noticed over 30 years ago people using administrative law to circumvent the United States Of America's Constitution / contract law through agreements made through State id's , etc...

  • @Drewminnich
    @Drewminnich 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +18

    Thanks Steve for explaining that Chevron thing… hagd

  • @ClickinChicken
    @ClickinChicken 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you sir, bigger people. Who get things.

  • @mooredelira
    @mooredelira 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    thanks for explaining this.

  • @janetbayford133
    @janetbayford133 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +29

    What’s bad is people like you who think that corporations should run the world for their shareholders

    • @solice8844
      @solice8844 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Try a socialist country instead if that bothers you.

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

      @@solice8844
      Or, y’know, we can look at just how many corporations break the existing laws for greed literally all the time and recognize that it’s a major problem that this idiotic decision just exacerbates

    • @scottlocke3645
      @scottlocke3645 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Grow a brain!​@@solice8844

    • @teresafallon3340
      @teresafallon3340 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Do you have a retirement plan. If so, chance🤔 is your a share holder in some BIG Company

    • @heavyd777
      @heavyd777 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I don't think anyone is saying that.

  • @tarajoyce3598
    @tarajoyce3598 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Since Chevron was overturned shouldn't the corporate veil also be overturned?

  • @scwps23
    @scwps23 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +28

    Of course the bureaucratic JB administration thinks this is terrible.

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Most anyone not a moron or a corporate shill knows this is terrible.
      Much better to clog up the courts and let uneducated judges determine policy rather than functioning like every other modern country (and how we cleaned up rivers, smog, and figured out you need to refrigerate foods)

  • @JohnnieCakes
    @JohnnieCakes 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    "Let's hope we have a new president that respects the courts' rule." Wtf. Lmao. Implying that DT would do so is CRAZY! At least JB is acting on behalf of the people.

  • @user-nx9bp4yv5n
    @user-nx9bp4yv5n 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    We know that greed is part of the human condition and we as a species have struggled to be more than we are now.but for those who are suffering this condition to try to normalize their condition is like trying to get an alcoholic to stop drinking..the only difference is that most alcoholics eventually accept their addiction and try to save themselves and those around them ...there does not seem to be any such way to help or stop these people as they come to accept their behavior ...please no more bs

  • @suec.5840
    @suec.5840 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Nero fiddling...🔥🔥

  • @pandemicdogclub3852
    @pandemicdogclub3852 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great video Steve. Totally agree!!!

  • @billmitchell2080
    @billmitchell2080 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Individual liberty? Corporations who are basic monopolies are not individuals. Your conception of society is ridiculous.

  • @Larry00000
    @Larry00000 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Congress does not have the resources to be completely specific about the legislation it passes, so executive branch agencies must determine how to enforce the laws, and the courts determine whether the agencies are acting within the scope of the legislation.

  • @samborambobo
    @samborambobo 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    *Dogs everywhere can breathe a sigh of relief*

  • @YIKESMF
    @YIKESMF 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    😂😂😂 as if you think us lowly blue collar workers are dumb. EAT THE RICH. PAY YOUR DAMN TAXES.

  • @realdeal5475
    @realdeal5475 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    And who said the Supreme Court can’t be brought

  • @Mike-vd2qt
    @Mike-vd2qt 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Fact: doing away with federal agencies would allow large corporations to require unlimited work hours, no safety regulations, no health insurance, pesticides in your water, lead in your air, no public schools, no safety standards, operate in banking without regs, poisonous food production, no consumer safety, and operate as they pleased. Every individual for themselves. Without agency regulations every federal court would be inundated with cases to overturn codes and regulations. Each federal court district and state supreme court would issue different decisions. That would basically stop economic growth in the U.S. as every corporation, state, county, federal entity tried to interpret rules and regulations. Guaranteed anarchy and free fall economy.

  • @Toggle_New_Top_2SeeCensored
    @Toggle_New_Top_2SeeCensored 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Ban digital surveillance

  • @maxstrongCW
    @maxstrongCW 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +37

    This wil also stop food,meat companies from having those pesky regulators stop them from selling tainted foods 😮

    • @user-gn3ez2me9o
      @user-gn3ez2me9o 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Stop them?

    • @heavyd777
      @heavyd777 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      That's absurd.

    • @pamelawise1203
      @pamelawise1203 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      You must not have read any labels in grocery stores now. Hence why America foods are banned globally except for America Citizens to consume. Umkay. I'm now canning to know what is in my food without regulations 😅😅

    • @120offroadllc
      @120offroadllc 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Aluminum cans soda,beer, etc...have a plastic liner. Had no idea, but yes it's true. Crazy.

    • @hubertwalters4300
      @hubertwalters4300 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@120offroadllcAll approved by the USDA.

  • @kimbowers3607
    @kimbowers3607 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Praise God Praise God! Thankyou God..all glory to you for this overturn decision. Please help us correct the wrongs and abuses of these regulations of agencies. Thankyou for protecting the constitution. Help our leaders make appropriate decisions and laws!

  • @nenafan1
    @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    What idiocy…

  • @TheSharperSword
    @TheSharperSword 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Centralization of power

  • @henrybaron8517
    @henrybaron8517 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Absolutely!! 💯

  • @marilynbuschle2842
    @marilynbuschle2842 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Amen to your comments!

  • @thomasoconnor3803
    @thomasoconnor3803 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Congress should have the last say

  • @user-rl3iv2jk9q
    @user-rl3iv2jk9q 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    7 July 2024
    Thank you Mr. Forbes .

  • @danchatigny168
    @danchatigny168 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Right on!! Good news

  • @JonnyDee
    @JonnyDee 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At 1st I thought he was talking about the SCOTUS decision regarding Presidential immunity.

  • @k-mparker
    @k-mparker 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So, this means I can legally delete my diesel truck, bcuz the DPF, EGR, and having to put DEF in my truck is unconstitutional. The regulation/law enacted by the EPA is unacceptable and hopefully is eradicated.

  • @charlieward5476
    @charlieward5476 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why is qualified immunity not apart of this

  • @chrisjansson4540
    @chrisjansson4540 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO.........
    Clear mind and body....competence and ability.........I declare. I will willful. Etc

  • @paulginsberg6942
    @paulginsberg6942 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Supposed expertise indeed.

  • @2023Red
    @2023Red 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You are sooooooo right!

  • @Scaliad
    @Scaliad 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +24

    Great decision for the American people!

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Yeah!!! I want more lead in my water right away!!!
      And who needs to refrigerate milk, anyway?? Those poor corporations pay way too much having to maintain basic safety standards

  • @rmaddendesign
    @rmaddendesign 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Steve, have you thought about running again?

  • @lilyoquendo3485
    @lilyoquendo3485 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    USA has to do something about China and Russia in Cuba!

  • @michaelcastaneda4135
    @michaelcastaneda4135 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Child support enforcement R.I.P

  • @vroshon
    @vroshon 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think this will make politicians do their job to remove ambiguity from their laws. Purposely passing laws to manipulate an ambiguity loophole so that their "expert" can call shots is ripe for corruption. This is important for my state where they want to get rid of Natural Gas as a fuel source citing cherry picked data that split hairs for efficiency. Millions of homes have natural gas water heaters, dryers and ranges vs electric and would be forced to eventually change over at their own cost. It hit the new construction industry first as now they had to redesign floorplans to allow for larger water heater storage because no new construction was allowed to put in gas water heaters and any new construction that hadn't sold was retrofitted with electric water heaters at builder cost. Just pass along the costs to consumers for a misguided attempt at "going green". What about emissions taxes on older vehicles that punish the poor who can't buy teslas in my state. There are so many things that should have gone to court but didn’t and made life hard for millions based on "expert" opinion.

  • @barbaraculy121
    @barbaraculy121 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    HALLELUJAH

  • @AliceGraham-ig3fv
    @AliceGraham-ig3fv 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This statement is dishonest or ignorant or both. Agencies do not legislate law. They create regulations drafted by people familiar with the job of the particular agency, that are persuasive but not controlling on the courts. Taking away power from the agencies allows more power to the courts. With the present status of the federal courts, this is excellent for big business and horrible for consumers. It's too bad more people don't understand the terrible implications of this decision.

  • @OldMiddleClassGuy
    @OldMiddleClassGuy 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +16

    Steve Forbes is an oligarch that speaks for big business and the ultra-rich. The elimination of Chevron deference leaves the courts to decide on technical issues of all regulations instead of the experts that were put in place in the agencies that are now rendered powerless. And the courts keeping up with all of the decisions to protect the general puplic, that are no longer spread across the appropriate departments, will be an impossible task.
    Lack of expert regulation will, once again allow industry to bestow the general public with rampant pollution and unsafe products, to say the least.

    • @KarlGouzd
      @KarlGouzd 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Not only that, but are the Courts experts?

    • @JakMakes-z5o
      @JakMakes-z5o 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      So people who you consider experts should decide laws for the country? Unelected person who has a specific degree will decide what is or is not legal? Cut the script

  • @patientzero5685
    @patientzero5685 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    owned by Hong Kong-based investment group Integrated Whale Media Investments since 2014. Its chairperson and editor-in-chief is Steve Forbes,

  • @dr.ryttmastarecctm6595
    @dr.ryttmastarecctm6595 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    Let us not forget the FDA, BATFE, _ad infinitum!_

  • @1gr8scot1
    @1gr8scot1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Senior Executive Service I hope can be looked into

  • @franksullivan1873
    @franksullivan1873 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    That’s why we got all these costly Departments and agencies.Whenever a President doesn’t get what they want done they use an agency or create a new one.Personally half of the Federal Government is not needed and is a burden of debt on us all.

    • @nenafan1
      @nenafan1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Personally you have no idea what you’re talking about.
      Just the EPA and FDA have done more for the average citizen that any president since LBJ and the voting right act.

  • @terry6020
    @terry6020 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You are completely wrong.

  • @jamesburge1983
    @jamesburge1983 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Says the guy who stands to make money off of this 'deregulation'. Is this a conflict of interest?

  • @user-ni9ny6ei6w
    @user-ni9ny6ei6w 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

    ALWAYS APPRECIATE YOUR ARTICULATE WAY OF EXPLAINING THESE ARTICLES TO MAKE IT UNDERSTANDABLE TO THE AVERAGE PERSON !!!, WELL DONE AGAIN !!!.

  • @chaddy-me-boy8299
    @chaddy-me-boy8299 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Steve, can you go over the other SC overturn of Jarskey vs SEC.
    I see it as basically saying an agency admin hearing can be for deterrence penalty of a regulation, but if it’s a penalty of punishment, then a jury needs to decide.
    Also the REINs act is sitting in the senate that passed the house which is related as well.
    Thanks,

    • @chaddy-me-boy8299
      @chaddy-me-boy8299 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Unless someone has experienced an agency hearing, admin judge has so much power of what is left in or objected to by the opposition, or stricken fr the record in the hearing, it’s a joke, just like what happened with Trump.

  • @debbie5728
    @debbie5728 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

    Imagine having a fishing (or other business) and YOU have to pay $700.00 per day for a GOVERNMENT mandated “observer” ? Going back to pre Magna Carta era there, let alone any constitutionality.

    • @brb__bathroom
      @brb__bathroom 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      700 bucks for fishing? in what universe is that? got a source? I need to do my research

    • @IRaoulDuke
      @IRaoulDuke 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Dems would love nothing more than a government assigned agent to follow you in your daily lives to make sure you don't do anything they don't approve of. They also would want you to pay for it so they can continue to give the rest of your money to foreign countries and illegals.

    • @astronautical1082
      @astronautical1082 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Imagine letting greed driven simpletons loose on the fishery, oh wait that's why we had to regulate them in the first place. Causality is not your strong suit.

    • @industrialathlete6096
      @industrialathlete6096 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@brb__bathroom Sounds SO unbelievable, BUT IT IS!!!!!!!!!!! P.S.This 'example' is Just the tip of the iceberg!!!!!

    • @debbie5728
      @debbie5728 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@brb__bathroomI love that you think it’s so outrageous it”can no way be true”.. and you then unwittingly make my case how crazy the left it.. You can’t post links on YT but there’s already comments here, referring to the same thing.. but you can also look up MLPA and other UNELECTED “commissions” that make environmental law, mandates, and regulations/fees.

  • @christ5076
    @christ5076 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    Well said!

  • @lapetiteallemande1
    @lapetiteallemande1 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Next-up: "Why big corporations should be allowed to use slaves: The founding fathers thought slavery was fine" 🤮

  • @mikefowler301
    @mikefowler301 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    1984 a very bad year.

    • @eugenefirebird8938
      @eugenefirebird8938 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Good year. Bad liberal loony court ruling.

  • @doubleeagleaudio
    @doubleeagleaudio 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Listening to those that believe all the things that caused all your problems!? Bold strategy. Let’s see how it plays out. 💋🍑👋