Love this type of info, thanks for posting. I have a 24’ BZ and just got the Veepeak OBD2 BT w Car scanner Elm. I noticed my SOC is consistently 10% less than what’s showing on my MID. Are you experiencing something similar and what software are you using? Based on your video it looks like a 6% difference.
I also use Car Scanner. The difference between dashboard & true levels will vary. At 100% charged, it is really 95.3%. The value will grow closer as the level drops to 62%, then it will cross were dashboard is less than the true value. That reflects the longevity buffers at both ends, since 0% isn't really empty.
@@john1701a thanks for the reply. That makes sense w the top and bottom buffer. It would have been nice if Toyota gave us a little more tech data on the MID or allowed for a profile where 0% was actually near 0% true SOC so it’s not a guessing game when you’re actually going to run out of charge.
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.83[2/2] ประสบการณ์ขนหัวลุกจากตำนานวงการผี!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T_kFecQw7Ds/mqdefault.jpg)
Love this type of info, thanks for posting. I have a 24’ BZ and just got the Veepeak OBD2 BT w Car scanner Elm. I noticed my SOC is consistently 10% less than what’s showing on my MID. Are you experiencing something similar and what software are you using? Based on your video it looks like a 6% difference.
I also use Car Scanner. The difference between dashboard & true levels will vary. At 100% charged, it is really 95.3%. The value will grow closer as the level drops to 62%, then it will cross were dashboard is less than the true value. That reflects the longevity buffers at both ends, since 0% isn't really empty.
@@john1701a thanks for the reply. That makes sense w the top and bottom buffer. It would have been nice if Toyota gave us a little more tech data on the MID or allowed for a profile where 0% was actually near 0% true SOC so it’s not a guessing game when you’re actually going to run out of charge.