I never do video ! But for photography I often use my A7RIV Cameras in APSC mode when I do not need 61 megapixel, 26 megapixels in APSC mode is still very good. Fx my 24mm becomes a 35mm in APSC mode and my 55mm becomes a 82mm equivalent.
Thanks for the video. I'm a photographer and actually interested in the a7c with APSC lens in photo mode, but I watched your video anyway because you come across as quite likeable. Good work. Keep it up. Thumbs up and subscription is clicked. Maybe I do a little more video stuff in the future😛
Дякую. Це саме той тест що я шукав. В мене зараз є 3 линзи які купувались для ZV-E10, але я роздивляюся можливість переходу на a7c не купуючи поки нові лінзи.
The idea that larger pixels perform better in low light is a myth. DPreview has a full video on the topic. Long story short, all that matters is total light captured, not how its divided, which makes sense when you really think about it. So if surface area is the same of the sensor + no line skipping is involved, you can expect a 24 mp to perform as well as 12 mp in terms of light sensitivity.
@@CamberFilmSchool The 2nd native iso on the A7s3 is much higher, so that is an objective advantage. But also advances can generally improve it. But for example the A1 is at no disadvantage whatsoever due to being an 8k sensor vs other modern sensors with the same native isos. This is a great video that directly compares higher pixel density cameras and shows they are in fact, exactly as good in low light - th-cam.com/video/VSFqCnzIe9M/w-d-xo.html
I plan to upgrade my camera from ZV-E10 to fullframe camera and using Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 apsc lens for videos and portrait photos while waiting budget to buy new fullframe lens. Could you suggest me about my idea to use this apsc lens for fullframe body such as A7IV in crop mode? I know that it lost the mega pixel but for the quality of images, is it ok to use?
would you recommend getting 17-70 for A7C then? for photography? that lens is super versatile. I have 28-75mm but missing that wide shot... or getting 17-28mm as separate one?
I wouldn’t purposely get an APS-C lens for a full frame camera. You’re going to get much better quality using the whole sensor and a quality lens made for it.
Sorry but this is not a comparison...you can't compare an apsc lens with the same aperture of a full frame lens..an f2.8 apsc lens have the same amount of bokeh of an f4 in full frame. That's a right comparison for the bokeh. After that I have had the Tamron 17-70 and when you zoom in and out and you see the focus that use not perfect this is not a problem of the camera but is a problem of that specific lens. The Tamron 11-20 doesn't have that problem. In the end the iso problem is the same in the full frame camera when you switch to apsc mode. I make the same test with my Sony a7iv and when you use full frame sensor in apsc mode you obviously don't use all the sensor so you obtain the same result. Although the Sony Zve 10 is not the right camera to make this test because is not a good camera for many reason
Yes, you would have to make that aperture conversion if you were comparing and aps-c camera to a full frame, but I was using the full frame in aps-c mode so it would then be equivalent to use the same aperture on both. Obviously the lens is going to affect the quality, which is why I also use the same lens on the comparisons. The zv-e10 is obviously nowhere near as god as the a7iv, but it’s still a good camera if you understand it’s limitations and work around them.
📸 What are your thoughts on APS-C mode? 🤔
I never do video ! But for photography I often use my A7RIV Cameras in APSC mode when I do not need 61 megapixel, 26 megapixels in APSC mode is still very good. Fx my 24mm becomes a 35mm in APSC mode and my 55mm becomes a 82mm equivalent.
Yea, didn’t even consider using it to lower file size!
I was just searching for this🔥perfect timing
Awesome! 😉
Thanks for the video. I'm a photographer and actually interested in the a7c with APSC lens in photo mode, but I watched your video anyway because you come across as quite likeable. Good work. Keep it up. Thumbs up and subscription is clicked. Maybe I do a little more video stuff in the future😛
Nice! 😉
APS-C mode is great for turning one lens into essentially two with the crop. I love it as it saves me having to buy longer focal lengths.
Definitely! Just make sure you have adequate lighting and you’re all set.
Дякую. Це саме той тест що я шукав.
В мене зараз є 3 линзи які купувались для ZV-E10, але я роздивляюся можливість переходу на a7c не купуючи поки нові лінзи.
Glad to help! 👍
Very interesting test. Well-done and thank you!
Thx! 👍
The idea that larger pixels perform better in low light is a myth. DPreview has a full video on the topic. Long story short, all that matters is total light captured, not how its divided, which makes sense when you really think about it. So if surface area is the same of the sensor + no line skipping is involved, you can expect a 24 mp to perform as well as 12 mp in terms of light sensitivity.
Then why does my a7iii not look as good in the same settings/lens/etc as my a7sii?
@@CamberFilmSchool The 2nd native iso on the A7s3 is much higher, so that is an objective advantage. But also advances can generally improve it. But for example the A1 is at no disadvantage whatsoever due to being an 8k sensor vs other modern sensors with the same native isos.
This is a great video that directly compares higher pixel density cameras and shows they are in fact, exactly as good in low light - th-cam.com/video/VSFqCnzIe9M/w-d-xo.html
Yea, I know about the native ISOs, but I think you missed that I wrote a7S2. Regardless, I’ll check out that video later. Thx!
I plan to upgrade my camera from ZV-E10 to fullframe camera and using Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 apsc lens for videos and portrait photos while waiting budget to buy new fullframe lens. Could you suggest me about my idea to use this apsc lens for fullframe body such as A7IV in crop mode? I know that it lost the mega pixel but for the quality of images, is it ok to use?
Sure, it’ll still be fine to use in APS-C mode.
would you recommend getting 17-70 for A7C then? for photography? that lens is super versatile. I have 28-75mm but missing that wide shot... or getting 17-28mm as separate one?
I wouldn’t purposely get an APS-C lens for a full frame camera. You’re going to get much better quality using the whole sensor and a quality lens made for it.
Sorry but this is not a comparison...you can't compare an apsc lens with the same aperture of a full frame lens..an f2.8 apsc lens have the same amount of bokeh of an f4 in full frame. That's a right comparison for the bokeh. After that I have had the Tamron 17-70 and when you zoom in and out and you see the focus that use not perfect this is not a problem of the camera but is a problem of that specific lens. The Tamron 11-20 doesn't have that problem. In the end the iso problem is the same in the full frame camera when you switch to apsc mode. I make the same test with my Sony a7iv and when you use full frame sensor in apsc mode you obviously don't use all the sensor so you obtain the same result. Although the Sony Zve 10 is not the right camera to make this test because is not a good camera for many reason
Yes, you would have to make that aperture conversion if you were comparing and aps-c camera to a full frame, but I was using the full frame in aps-c mode so it would then be equivalent to use the same aperture on both. Obviously the lens is going to affect the quality, which is why I also use the same lens on the comparisons. The zv-e10 is obviously nowhere near as god as the a7iv, but it’s still a good camera if you understand it’s limitations and work around them.