Introducing: UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 เม.ย. 2024
  • The UniFi Dream Machine Pro has captivated tech enthusiasts and professionals alike with its magical IT experience, right out of the box. Today, we're thrilled to unveil its next evolution - the Dream Machine Pro Max.
    This second -generation Dream Machine is fundamentally about scale. It's been entirely redesigned to accommodate larger and more complex networks. Now featuring double the compute resources, it efficiently manages hundreds of UniFi devices and seamlessly supports thousands of client devices.
    We've significantly enhanced the routing performance, achieving up to 5 Gbps with deep packet inspection and fully enabled security services.
    New high-availability features have been incorporated to ensure continuous operation and peace of mind.
    Additionally, we've made expert support available around the clock with just a click in the Site Manager.
    Learn more: ui.social/UDMProMax
    - Store: store.ui.com/us/en/pro/catego...
    - Tech Specs: techspecs.ui.com/unifi/unifi-...
    ► Expand Your UniFi Deployment: store.ui.com/
    ► Find Which UniFi Console is right for you at calculator.ui.com.
    ► Design Your Deployment w/ UniFi Design Center: design.ui.com/
    ► Join the Ubiquiti Community of Active Experts: community.ui.com/
    Stay updated with the latest UniFi news - subscribe to our TH-cam channel and FOLLOW US:
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Twitter: x.com/ubiquiti
    Facebook: / uieverywhere
    Instagram: / ubiquiti
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 141

  • @PhilWard
    @PhilWard 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Ubiquiti... Your customers tell you "exactly" what they want. And then your directors of product development, completely ignore the customers. Why?

    • @orional1977
      @orional1977 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thats because one p[erson owns 90%+ of their stock.

    • @MarcoSilva-ec2ej
      @MarcoSilva-ec2ej หลายเดือนก่อน

      así son los productos yankis, solo venden humo!! hacen sus presentaciones y tratan de sacar un producto que nio a sudo terminado, en fin te venden una mierda a precio de oro!!

  • @nlmaster9811
    @nlmaster9811 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    We want Etherlighting and faster ports. We know the R&D isnt that crazy to make these upgrades, especially for the price. GbE has been around for a quarter of a century, anyone interested in this is going to want more.

  • @OnlyMon0
    @OnlyMon0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Odd not seeing the RGB “Etherlighting” on this newer model. But it’s featured in the video on other products, please try to make the lineup a bit more consistent.

  • @UnscuffedIonian
    @UnscuffedIonian 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Can't wait for udm pro max ultra se

    • @auralxtc
      @auralxtc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Hopefully that one will have 10GbE / 25GbSFP+ included. That would actually be "feature complete" for me.

    • @JetBlackRage
      @JetBlackRage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah these name conventions are getting crazy

    • @blairfus
      @blairfus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd wait for the G2 revision which adds the geofence garage door opener but only supports token ring.

    • @Photoshopuzr
      @Photoshopuzr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      not going to happen. these have to sell. if it does happen let it be. but not going to hold my breath for it.

    • @EdoDijkgraaf
      @EdoDijkgraaf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With at least a bit more decent 10GbE connectivity. I think I like this machine, but I won't buy a 5GbE router with some 10GbE capabilities.

  • @catlover9998
    @catlover9998 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hopefully we will get an "Ultra" to compliment this new "Pro Max". Init7 (Swiss ISP) offers 25Gbps WAN (through tapping into P2P FTTH) which would be cool to use directly with Unifi. Sad that they abandoned their "USW-Leaf" a few years ago that offered up to 100Gbps switching. Hope to see some more "datacenter"-class 25+Gbps products that also just so happen to be usable for needlessly fast ISP-provided internet connections.

    • @whatisthissss
      @whatisthissss 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah for how much though...

  • @SilverCymbal
    @SilverCymbal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Ubiquti turn on Raid 0 on that drive. You are just being cruel to us! We don't need an ashtray

  • @kensingh9527
    @kensingh9527 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This would be the go to device for small businesses now, you don’t have to buy a separate UNVR and save money and rack space while doing it!

  • @dataplatter
    @dataplatter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The keystone of the Pro Max branding, is Etherlighting- I mean I'd rather have 4x10G ports (for small star topology), or all 2.5GbE, or PoE, but it sure seems like a big branding miss to omit Etherlighting from a UI Pro Max product.

  • @wodn184fn8
    @wodn184fn8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Glad to see we finally have a better udm for more high workloads. I would love to see a new redesign though. Yes, is powerfull but it stills have the same cpu with a tiny clock boost and 4 extra gb of ram. Love the effort nonetheless. Better is nothing but i will wait a little more.

  • @techtalkandtechunboxed
    @techtalkandtechunboxed 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really cool 👌🏼

  • @jamieloy9384
    @jamieloy9384 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Would have loved to have heard some specs like multi-Gig ports and PoE++ support. Love my UDM-SE but those are a couple of the limitations on it. (No multi-Gig LAN side and not even PoE+ on all PoE ports) This Pro-Max looks sweet!

    • @UbiquitiInc
      @UbiquitiInc  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Thanks for your feedback! UDM Pro Max is about pure gateway performance. It essentially doubles the scale and routing performance of what a standard UDM Pro/SE is capable of and pairs with a UniFi Switch Pro Max for 2.5GbE and PoE++ ports to serve hundreds of UniFi devices.

    • @Boglim
      @Boglim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@UbiquitiIncit’s 2024, I don’t think any next evolution in this product line should ever include gigabit switches. If it’s meant to be used with a separate switch anyway, might as well scrap the gigabit switch for a third nvr bay at this point

    • @Brian-tu7yn
      @Brian-tu7yn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People need to stop buying this crap. All the products are artificially stunted and designed in a way to have limits that have to overcome by pairing with another over priced UI product.

    • @realiesOne
      @realiesOne 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      they probably just overclocked their existing chipset stock by +300mhz and launched a new product lol

  • @Traumatree
    @Traumatree 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A step has been made, yea! Now, we need the UDM Enterprise please. That's the one I want and need!

  • @benlongjohn6857
    @benlongjohn6857 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    People arent talking about the phone support finally offered by UniFi!!!

    • @jamieloy9384
      @jamieloy9384 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was a game changer for the small business I implemented it at! They save so much money over conventional hosting plus they have full control of everything.

    • @russellharrison619
      @russellharrison619 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      everything i have heard say its not worth it....

    • @jamieloy9384
      @jamieloy9384 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@russellharrison619 you heard wrong IMO but I'm always on the lookout for something better. When they said it wasn't worth it, what service did they recommend that's comparable in price, features and control?

    • @alexisteha
      @alexisteha 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@russellharrison619 its getting better week by week, there still scaling and working out kinks

    • @alexisteha
      @alexisteha 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@russellharrison619 its wortth it now, maybe not a few months ago

  • @andrewenglish3810
    @andrewenglish3810 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    @Ubiquiti your competition uses a second processor for DPS/IPS to not affect their full wire speed. I am not sure why you are still behind on this? Lets hope you next Dream Machine it at par to what your compeition is offering. For now its a great device to upgrade my home lab with, nothing more.

    • @MattNis1
      @MattNis1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It would be $10 more expensive

    • @realiesOne
      @realiesOne 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      probably even less than $10 with large orders, it would be even simpler to slap an octa-core cpu on the motherboard and call it a day; my phone from 2014 had a better chipset than this quadcore@2ghz that is absolutely pegged with just a couple of their advertised features turned on... what a shame

  • @kenmack
    @kenmack 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why on is there not 2.5 gb on the switch ports? I just don’t get it. I know you guys are making “prosumer” products - but please, we need 2.5 on the UDM.

  • @BrownRA
    @BrownRA 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    NICE!!!

  • @orional1977
    @orional1977 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No POE ports?

  • @YaGr-ip3ub
    @YaGr-ip3ub 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool Device!

  • @snowtown1233
    @snowtown1233 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally, the long-awaited upgrade. Great! Is it still the Annapurna Labs AL324 simply with increased clock speed (2.0 GHz vs. 1.7 GHz) or is it a new CPU?

  • @fiveofknives
    @fiveofknives 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Are these firewalls any good, I'm used to rolling watchguard

  • @neko77025
    @neko77025 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When is the SE verison ?

  • @Overlanding
    @Overlanding 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Has Ubiquiti finally implemented a way to prevent all telemetry data being sent to Ubiquiti? UDM PM would be interesting with its 5Gbit IPS but there’s no way I’ll buy hardware that tells the manufacturer what’s going on behind my (fire-)walls…
    Last time I checked was 4 years ago, so interested in the current state of things.

  • @KenjiVdusc
    @KenjiVdusc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The naming scheme is going out of hand, as it seems custom nowadays. Happy to see new stuff, but wont justify a upgrade if you dont expect to run beyond limits with the old one.

  • @pixelhabits
    @pixelhabits 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The price point does not make sense without at least PoE & 2.5gb ports. I would 100% replace the less than 3month old UDM SE at one of my sites if it included that.
    The 2.5 gb and PoE would allow me to deploy the U7 access points without a replacement switch and the additional 3 2K cameras the higher processer allows + option to raid the storage would be perfect for this location. Opportunity to truly improve the product line lost

    • @chaosfenix
      @chaosfenix 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I would like POE++ on a couple of ports because it would work amazing for sites that need additional switches for POE passthrough.

  • @bjoremo
    @bjoremo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If it had 8 PoE++ ports the Dream Machine Pro Max would the the go-to device for every scenario!!

    • @chaosfenix
      @chaosfenix 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Close. It would also need 2.5Gbps ports as that is what is needed for any of their wifi 7 APs.

  • @kmsm668
    @kmsm668 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No POE?

    • @druxpack8531
      @druxpack8531 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no, that will be on the UDM-Pro-Max-Ultra-Mega-Special-Edition coming soon

  • @lzcpg
    @lzcpg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is cool and all, but can we create IPv6-only VLANs yet?

    • @nlmaster9811
      @nlmaster9811 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Who uses IPv6?

    • @lzcpg
      @lzcpg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nlmaster9811 well my personal usecase is as someone developing network applications in a homelab. But many of the hyperscalers are IPv6 only internally, many IoT devices require IPv6, some ISPs have switched to IPv6 public addresses only (when I had an ISP that did this, I ran into issues with the NAT64 and some p2p applications), and also people who want to experience modern networking: you don't need DHCP (though you can use both 2 message and 4 message DHCP), any machine can become a router, and if you have enough devices, you don't have to worry about running out of addresses.

    • @lzcpg
      @lzcpg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nlmaster9811 well my personal usecase is developing network applications and using my homelab to test. But, most hyperscalers are IPv6 only internally, a lot of IoT devices only support IPv6, some ISP only hand out public IPv6 (which, when I had an ISP do this, some p2p applications had issues with a NAT64), and anyone who just wants modern networking, IPv6 supports any machine being a router, prefix delegation, SLAAC, you don't need DHCP (though you can do both 2 message and 4 message DHCP), it has many more available address and if you're developing applications designed to work on cellular networks, it's a must. It has also been around for 30ish years now, while IPv4 has been around for over 40 years, if we're going based off initial RFC drafts, so it's not like it's bleeding edge tech.

  • @VanFS3K
    @VanFS3K 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I wonder why they opted to not have PoE on these ports

    • @matrixplace
      @matrixplace หลายเดือนก่อน

      To make you buy separate PoE switch...

  • @MattNis1
    @MattNis1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No POE ports

  • @badbear17
    @badbear17 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    600 dollars and it doesn't even have PoE ports? Really guys?

  • @jlr_
    @jlr_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Had to check the date when i saw the title 😂

    • @synonum
      @synonum 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yea me to, just 5Gig is so 2020

  • @snyxexd7880
    @snyxexd7880 หลายเดือนก่อน

    UniFi products are the best

  • @URackADisciprine
    @URackADisciprine 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the 2U device with LCM above the lower brush panel?

    • @degraafrob
      @degraafrob 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      UniFi USP RPS Pro th-cam.com/video/LBvZAjunk5w/w-d-xo.html

  • @slijkhuis
    @slijkhuis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Absolutely not worth the upgrade from a UDM Pro or UDM Pro SE. I would even say a downgrade from the UDM Pro SE for lacking PoE ports.

  • @mausball
    @mausball 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So...true HA on the UDMP/SE in 4.0? Please?

    • @UbiquitiInc
      @UbiquitiInc  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Confirming true HA w/ automatic Shadow Mode failover will be supported on UDM Pro Max / Pro / SE with UniFi OS 4.0.

    • @Boglim
      @Boglim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@UbiquitiIncwhen will 4.0 release?

    • @createdbyeric
      @createdbyeric 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Boglim They're probably not going to respond to this. But early versions of it were provided to reviewers for testing which probably means it will hit Early Access pretty soon. Official release is probably at least a month+ away.

    • @Boglim
      @Boglim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@createdbyericthanks for the info

  • @LITWP
    @LITWP 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anyword on PPPoE throughput improvements? With a 3Gbps fibre connection, I'm lucky to hit 2.5Gbps.

  • @ChrisHolzer
    @ChrisHolzer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    UI is trying a bit too hard to be Apple with their branding. "Pro Max Ultra EXTREME" - this is just silly considering that you sell these products to professionals not everage joe.....

    • @terrellclark
      @terrellclark 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, the founder came from Apple so… lol

  • @D8099.
    @D8099. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please tell me shadow mode will work with my old udm pro? It’s just for backup so why waste that hardware.

    • @SentientNut
      @SentientNut 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sadly not. Crosstalk Solutions did a video on it and confirmed after talking with their Unifi rep it does not work with either the SE or standard UDM Pro.

    • @UbiquitiInc
      @UbiquitiInc  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      High Avail Automatic Shadow Mode will be available for rack-mounted Dream Machine Devices (Pro, Se, Pro Max).

    • @SentientNut
      @SentientNut 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@UbiquitiInc But not back and forth, right? Like an SE won't work with a pro max.

    • @Boglim
      @Boglim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SentientNut that’s correct

  • @druxpack8531
    @druxpack8531 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "hey, i need HA, but could you throw in a dual drive NVR that isn't HA? Also, can it have 8 gig ports, but make sure to leave out POE so i can't use them with cameras or 2.5gb ports so it's completely useless...oh, can you use the same 12 year old CPU, just make the clocks higher? It would sell like hotcakes!" -Said No-one ever.

  • @SammyPC89
    @SammyPC89 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My God!

  • @joeb2151
    @joeb2151 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is SO CLOSE. I would like to have two 10Gb ISP connections, and a 10Gb into my network.
    Is the plan to use two of these with ISP1 to UDM ProMax1 and ISP2 into UDM ProMax2 or something?
    Or do you have a new UXG Pro Max heading our way? I don't need disks for surveillance, I use the NVRs, but I do want that full performance failover available.

    • @chaosfenix
      @chaosfenix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can designate one of the fiber cages as a WAN port. You would just need to get a SFP+ module for it and you should be good.

    • @mr.campbellhouse
      @mr.campbellhouse 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@chaosfenix The top SFP+ port is WAN 2 out of the box. What Joe is saying is that there aren't enough ports for 2 10 gig WAN while also having a 10 gig LAN which is accurate.

    • @chaosfenix
      @chaosfenix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mr.campbellhouse Ah I missed that. You are correct then. Honestly I don't like the device at all. How do they justify charging $230 more than the UDM Pro for simply adding a single SATA drive bay? If this thing really is intended for larger deployments it doesn't make sense. Anyone that is installing hundreds of unifi devices and thousands of endpoints is not going to stick their security system on their firewall. They are going to get a separate NVR which Ubiquiti already sells. They also aren't going to use gigabit ports or even 10GBE ports for their trunk ports. They are seriously trying to portray this as an enterprise level device all while limiting most of the ports to gigabit? They do realize that gigabit Ethernet came out in 1999 right?
      If they actually wanted to have this be more for enterprise they should have dropped the drive cages and the 8GBE ports. Instead they should have had a 10GbE RJ45 port, a console port, and around 6 QSFP28 ports so they could actually connect to the trunk of their network. As is this thing will bottleneck it. If they wanted to add even more ports, especially since they got rid of the drive cages, that would be fine. I don't think anyone would complain about more ports or faster ports if they didn't balloon the price doing so.
      If they actually want an all in one device the drive cages are great but those 8 RJ45 ports should all have POE with probably 4 having POE++ and the other 4 having POE+. They also should be at least 2.5Gbps. The RJ45 WAN port should be 10GbE capable and the 2 fiber cages should be QSFP28. If they wanted to add more ports to this that would be fine. I would be fine with more SFP+ cages or more 2.5GBE ports or another RJ45 WAN port for a backup WAN connection but I just layed out where they should have gone with it keeping the port count and type the same.

    • @mr.campbellhouse
      @mr.campbellhouse 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@chaosfenix What you are describing is going to cost a lot more than $599. Ultimately, this is for small/medium businesses who want more WAN throughput. As I mentioned in another comment, layer 3 switching mostly negates the benefit of this device having SFP28.
      Ultimately, anyone benefiting from the features you requested is going to be connecting to their switches not this device, making the addition of better on board switch moot.

    • @chaosfenix
      @chaosfenix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mr.campbellhouse Yes but those same people won't care about the additional drive bays either. This device is intended to be a all-in-one for SMB but it is seriously lacking on the networking side as they haven't bothered to upgrade it from the original UDM Pro that came out 3-4 years ago. Would it cost more? yes, but I don't think it would cost as much as you think it will either. I mean they have 8 10Gbps SFP+ ports on their aggregation switch and that only costs $270. If this device is meant to be an AIO for SMB then obviously they are going to have other layer 3 switches in their network but those are going to be connected with something faster than the 1Gbps RJ45 ports this thing has. They will need at least those 10Gbps SFP+ ports.
      This device is frustrating because instead of trying to be a jack of all trades it is doing everything poorly. They can use RJ45 ports. That is fine. But if they are using copper ports in a modern device they should be at least 2.5Gbps capable and they should at least consider making them POE Capable.
      If they don't want to do that because this is an enterprise switch meant to connnect thousands of devices then that is fine too. They should just be using more fiber ports instead then. I would like QSFP28 ports but hey if those are too expensive for the price range they want then SFP+ would be okay too.
      For some comparisons. Mikrotik was able to put 2.5GbE on their very similarly performing Mikrotik CRS310-8G+2S+IN for only $200. UDMs have more creature comforts and I do appreciate that but it isn't like it would break the bank to make them 2.5Gbps capable.
      Another Mikrotik switch, the CRS504-4XQ-IN, was also able to put 4 QSFP ports on it that actually run at 100Gbps each or can be bifurcated to support up to 16 25Gbps connections. It costs $655. Yes the UDM does a lot more than a basic switch and demands a premium for that but those 8 RJ45 ports on it aren't anything special and are just basic layer 3 ports.

  • @keymonne
    @keymonne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice

  • @MactelecomNetworks
    @MactelecomNetworks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Gotta say this is a nice device :)

  • @nerd_fathersons5468
    @nerd_fathersons5468 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just got one. To bad you want release a European USP-PDU Pro or USP-PDU HD

  • @Badgerized
    @Badgerized 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    No etherlighting, no buy. Simple as that. I may be a professional, but I love my RGB, and if my network closet isn't like a unicorn threw up rainbows, i don't want it.
    Plus, everyone knows... rgb adds speed

  • @ronniewatson322
    @ronniewatson322 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My thing is the LAN ports are not fully 5GB per port that’s total.
    Until it’s separate by port each 5GB then this machine would be useful.
    Don’t forget, memory what is the memory? The last one maxed out with out doing nothing to me.

  • @ChristianBlueChimp
    @ChristianBlueChimp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love Ubiquiti!

  • @Jr2728
    @Jr2728 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Take my money 😂😂😂

  • @Etheo8d
    @Etheo8d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pretty similar to Apple’s naming scheme

  • @mauriceatkinson9520
    @mauriceatkinson9520 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    when will your UDM product range be back in stock? I have been waiting for weeks and with it being out of stock for this long doesnt show your company in a positive light!!

  • @TobyRobertsThe
    @TobyRobertsThe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just after we had to build our own VM to overcome the limitations of the standard Pro models

  • @realiesOne
    @realiesOne 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "ubiquiti, milking it"

  • @jorgeeduardogiraldomorales5082
    @jorgeeduardogiraldomorales5082 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it available for Latin America?

  • @gregperrucci36
    @gregperrucci36 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another swing and a miss.

  • @MK-D-O
    @MK-D-O 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Apple get tf out of their bodies!!

  • @BarryMcCockiner825
    @BarryMcCockiner825 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    These comments do not disappoint. I hope you’re listening Ubiquiti, because you’re losing your customer base with all this nonsense.

  • @chaosfenix
    @chaosfenix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    This thing is honestly kinda worthless. It adds a second drive bay which is good but it doesn't have POE like the UDM Pro SE and the speed of the ports is the exact same as the other UDM PROs. Are you even trying? This thing will literally bottleneck your latest access point. Why don't the ports at least have 2.5Gbps across the board? We also aren't even getting an upgrade to 25Gbps on the fiber cages. How can you even justify charging $220 more than the UDM Pro by simply adding an extra drive cage?

    • @Gren4te
      @Gren4te 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Yeah I don’t really get it either. I don’t think anyone was waiting for that extra drive when you can buy the NVR for about the same price and have a dedicated Protect machine with 4 drives.
      The extra routing capacity is nice though. Especially since commercial multi gig lines are more and more affordable.

    • @Gorgula
      @Gorgula 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Killshot

    • @UbiquitiInc
      @UbiquitiInc  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Thanks for your feedback! UDM Pro Max is about pure gateway performance. It essentially doubles the scale and routing performance of what a standard UDM Pro/SE is capable of. UDM Pro Max is designed for large deployments where uplinked via SFP+ to Pro Aggregation and Switch Pro Max will be common to run hundreds of UniFi devices and thousands of clients.

    • @chaosfenix
      @chaosfenix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@UbiquitiInc Who would consolidate their NVR storage into a single device in such a deployment? It would make much more sense to break that out like you have already done with the NVR. You also already use SFP28 ports for aggregation on your high capacity aggregation switch. I get that you may have had a different use case in mind but your use case doesn't make sense in the real world. Anyone who legitimately has hundreds of unifi devices and thousands of endpoints would be doing all of these connections with fiber in which case every single one of the ports on here should have been fiber. They also wouldn't use a firewall as their camera storage. If they are planning to get dedicated switches for all of the devices I can guarantee you they will be getting dedicated NVRs.
      edit to fix grammar.

    • @chaosfenix
      @chaosfenix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Gren4te yes the extra routing capacity is nice but their decisions elsewhere kinda don't make sense. They are bottlenecking that performance by putting so many slow GBE ports on it. If their use case is really the hundreds of unifi devices and thousands of clients then they should have dropped the HDD cages. Nobody operating at that scale is going to put their camera storage on the same device. They are going to use a NVR. After that they should have changed the ports. Again nobody operating at that scale uses copper for their trunk, unless it was installed 10 years ago and they haven't bothered upgrading. They should have dropped all but like 2 of the RJ45 ports eligible for WAN and then had like 6 QSFP28 Ports.

  • @RickB3n
    @RickB3n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ubiquiti, give me one please

  • @themattmages
    @themattmages 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man I HATE you guys LOL. I just bought a UDM SE yesterday. WTF.

    • @chaosfenix
      @chaosfenix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Be happy you saved $100 and got ports with POE.

  • @ronniewatson322
    @ronniewatson322 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like the products but had to dislike this video.

  • @xu6dt
    @xu6dt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Products are way over priced for what you get.

  • @courtenaybotterill5591
    @courtenaybotterill5591 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Don't buy this stuff if you live in the UK. The returns process is done by sending stuff to the Netherlands. Your products get customs charges for returns! This stuff is garbage!