Unifi UDM Pro Max : Large scale deployments are here

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ค. 2024
  • In this video I take a look at the all new Unifi UDM Pro Max from Ubiquiti. The UDM Pro max has two hard drive bays for Unifi protect redundancy in a RAID 1 configuration. The UDM pro Max can handle about 200 Unifi devices and thousands of clients. The UDM Pro Max can also do 5Gbps with IDS/IPS on ( suspicious activity) and comes in at $599 USD MSRP
    ▶ Unifi pro max USA affiliate link :
    store.ui.com/us/en/pro/produc...
    ▶ Unifi pro max EU affiliate link :
    store.ui.com/eu/en/pro/produc...
    ▶ Ubiquiti affiliate link :
    store.ui.com/us/en?a_aid=MacT...
    ▶ Hire us on our website
    mactelecomnetworks.com/
    ▶ Watch my VLOG channel:
    / @techntails
    ▶ Join our Discord Channel:
    / discord
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Affiliates I use:
    ▶ VOIP.MS
    www.voip.ms/en/code/Mactelecom
    ▶Canadian Amazon Store front:
    www.amazon.ca/shop/mactelecom...
    ▶USA Amazon store front:
    www.amazon.com/shop/macteleco...
    ▶NordVPN:
    go.nordvpn.net/aff_c?offer_id...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ▶ Find us on social media:
    ▶ Instagram:
    / mactelecomnetworks
    ▶ Facebook:
    / mactelecomnetworks
    ▶ Twitter:
    / mactelecomn
    ▶ TikTok:
    / mactelecomnetworks
    0:00 Intro
    0:53 Taking a closer look at the UDM Pro Max
    3:01 Installing the UDM Pro Max into my network rack
    5:27 Initial configuration
    7:10 Migrating Unifi protect to the UDM Pro Max
    9:01 UDM Pro Max Price and Specs
    10:02 Setting up Automatic shadow mode
    12:14 Testing UDM Pro Max automatic shadow mode
    12:58 Testing IDS/IPS Speeds
    14:47 Final thoughts
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 135

  • @tonygerassi1502
    @tonygerassi1502 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

    I think it missed the ball and should have had 4x SFP+ ports to allow for true redundancy and resiliency.
    2 internet links for wan failover.
    2 core switch links for an individual link to a pair of aggregation switches. (Each aggregation switch has a link to both UDM Pro Max)
    Most redundant and resilient setups have 2 of everything. If a core switch dies, the secondary link to the secondary switch takes over. It still has a single point of failure with 1 link cable to 1 switch and if a aggregation switch dies, it still needs manual input to physically move the SFP uplinks from dead switch to active switch

    • @kristopherleslie8343
      @kristopherleslie8343 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I like your idea better

    • @kristopherleslie8343
      @kristopherleslie8343 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You’d normally have a second core

    • @Traumatree
      @Traumatree 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That will be the UDM Enterprise later this year... I hope! With no HDD bay to get 16 x 2.5GE, active redundant cooling and dual PSUs on top of what you ask with at least 4 x SPF+.

    • @kristopherleslie8343
      @kristopherleslie8343 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Traumatree won’t see dual psu

  • @orional1977
    @orional1977 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great review. Not a product that I need to replace my UDMP but it's nice to see where the future is going.

  • @cyberdog_17
    @cyberdog_17 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    LET'S GOOOOO!!!!!!! Great device! Great video, Cody!

  • @airborneinferno
    @airborneinferno 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Interesting stuff, Cody. Heard all about this and the roadmap yesterday at the London UWC which you flagged in one of your Livestreams. Was very interesting to hear from the CEO and all the other head guys. Thanks for the heads up!
    I'm kinda hoping some nuts will go for the Pro Max "just cos" and there'll be a few UDM SE units going cheap for me to upgrade!

  • @terryjohnson3100
    @terryjohnson3100 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Nice. I can't wait to test out the HA.

  • @SibirLupus
    @SibirLupus 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    Great video! The UDM Pro MAX looks like a great console to go with if you don't already have a UDM SE. And the automatic high availability is going to be a wonderful thing once they release Unifi OS 4.0. Its strange though that they have abandoned the PDU Pro's single WAN input to dual WAN outputs for the UDM console high availability feature.

  • @jfkastner
    @jfkastner 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great Video, Thank You!

  • @mausball
    @mausball 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    The HA cabling is actually really clean. No big parallel cable, no multiple cables from front to back. Just mirrored cables to the agg switch and the WAN. It makes perfect sense. Now to get that same HA mode running on the UDMSE.....

    • @gamingwithegoon
      @gamingwithegoon 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      or regular UDM Pro

    • @nielstaildeman
      @nielstaildeman 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      VRRP is not the same as HA. Also the cabling method is just the same as with any other router vendor.

  • @druxpack8531
    @druxpack8531 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    "hey, i need HA, but could you throw in a dual drive NVR that isn't HA? Also, can it have 8 gig ports, but make sure to leave out POE so i can't use them with cameras or 2.5gb ports so it's completely useless...oh, can you use the same 12 year old CPU, just make the clocks higher? It would sell like hotcakes!" -Said No-one ever.

  • @edvinsroze5388
    @edvinsroze5388 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thanks for the great video! I've been waiting for a more robust box for one of my installations, so this looks like a step in the right direction for my use case...HOWEVER...I did notice that in the section showing the Apps migrated, there was no Identity app. Do you know if the UDM Pro Max Supports Identity for one-click WiFi and Access?

  • @patricklyons7683
    @patricklyons7683 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Hopefully they do a ubiquity dream machine max. And a distribution power system for UK 220v power cabling, how is the optional power bank coming along?

  • @LordSaliss
    @LordSaliss 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +26

    What a pitiful update to the CPU, just a slightly higher clocked model. They should have finally moved past A57 cores and made this 10gbps IPS capable.

    • @Cemilaws
      @Cemilaws 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      Step by step, they need every dollar in your pocket:)

    • @kristopherleslie8343
      @kristopherleslie8343 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What would you expect for being reasonable

    • @LordSaliss
      @LordSaliss 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @@kristopherleslie8343 Is it reasonable though? The higher clocked SKU of a 12 year old architecture and adding 1 more hard drive bay while removing the extra power supply for PoE likely is a wash on cost difference, yet Ubiquiti wants to charge a $100 extra for something that was had already been $100 overpriced as it was?
      Reasonable would be a new CPU arch and higher clock speed with 10gb IPS capable for $800. Their competitor just did that and actually beat that price.

    • @kristopherleslie8343
      @kristopherleslie8343 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@LordSaliss I asked what would be reasonable was waiting on your reply.

    • @blakepriddy4997
      @blakepriddy4997 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Gotta wait for the UDM Pro Max Ultra for that capability

  • @DPCTechnology
    @DPCTechnology 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great review as always bro!

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Thanks you as well just finished your video

  • @wigglz
    @wigglz 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    A bit of a miss on the lack of syncing between devices on the drive for failover. There's a lot of technologies out there where they could have easily done this, hoping this is a feature in the future. Nice video doing a overview as per usual.

  • @pawpaw5821
    @pawpaw5821 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great video as usual, Cody. What about the noise level? Louder than the UDMSE?

  • @ollidecker
    @ollidecker 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    interesting new product =) would love to see anyony testing large scale networks, like these 1000clients. looks like unifi tries to design in a way, where you more and more dont need a server running the controller and have a separate usg for midscale networks with just say realworld 500-1000 clients parallel online

  • @sunefred
    @sunefred 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Are there any more utility type devices coming, such as Cloud Ultra?

  • @Cemilaws
    @Cemilaws 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Will udm se have also timeline recording to ssd like udm pro max? Or no updates for se model?

  • @torgut76
    @torgut76 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hello, does the UDM-Pro-Max have still the issue that all traffic going out of the WAN port is affected by by natting, so that I can not use it with VLANS on the WAN interface behind a third party SD-WAN or even other firewall solution. This would be a real benefit using the device in enterprise environments where networks/devices must be reached from other locations without port forwarding which is useless in enterprise scenarios. Would be nice if you find some time to to at this.

  • @omarparra1152
    @omarparra1152 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for your videos, greetings from Chile.
    I have a question, is it possible to use UDM pro or UMD SE as a Cloud Key, I manage a large network and the CloudKey is no longer able to load the network application.
    The question is because I have a third party Firewall.
    The current configuration is:
    Firewall, towards an Aggregate and the cloud key connected to the second switch.
    What I'm looking for is: Firewall -> UMD-> and then the rest of the network.
    On the unifi website there is a cloud key enterprise but it is not available yet.
    I hope you can help me.
    Kind regards

  • @Se7eNzz
    @Se7eNzz 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I'm currently running 2 UDM Pros in Shadow mode with 2 ISPs in a fail-over config, would I need a switch inbetween each ISP's modem and each UDM Pro to achieve HA Shadow mode? From what I've gathered, most ISPs in the US handout a single IP so I'm not sure if this would work in a failover config without 2 extra switches and double-NAT which doesn't seem ideal. Does that sound right or am I missing something?

  • @johnny_ma
    @johnny_ma 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    @Mactelecom Networks I have a bunch of flat ethernet cables, do you know of any cable combs that work well with flat cables?

  • @lordcarnorjax8599
    @lordcarnorjax8599 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Is HA mode going to be on any of the UXG line? The UXG-Pro at a minimum should have this.

  • @mcnewbs60
    @mcnewbs60 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

    Are you hooking up the same ISP connections or is this with 2 separate ISP?

    • @TangDynasty1983
      @TangDynasty1983 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      I have the same exact question, my ISP modem only has one downstream port...

    • @BentAnvilNZ
      @BentAnvilNZ 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Confused. I don't have an ISP modem so my ISP connection goes directly into my UDM Pro.

    • @NetJrLLC
      @NetJrLLC 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      You can use a switch to add ports to your isp modem.

    • @TangDynasty1983
      @TangDynasty1983 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      should I use a managed switch or unmanaged switch? Thanks.

    • @NetJrLLC
      @NetJrLLC 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@TangDynasty1983 it depends on your topology. But the simplest way would be modem -> unmanaged switch -> routers. A managed switch like Unifi, you simply create a vlan and use 3rd party gateway. Then you apply that as the native vlan to the 3 ports, 1 port for uplink to modem and 2 ports for downlinks to router. It can be any switch. You can even do it with the UDM built in switch.
      Edit: keep in mind you would need more than 1 public ip unless you are simply using the HA shadow mode feature or you didn’t care about NAT

  • @petervandebeek5980
    @petervandebeek5980 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Riiight. Looks fine. I wonder if that comes to the UDM-Pro/-SE with UniFi OS 4, where Cody seems to be running v4.0.2.
    Thanks for the video!!

  • @SY1337
    @SY1337 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thanks for the quick review, but IMO there are a few important things missing.
    1. Could you include a block diagram showing how all the ports are connected and their respective speeds? Is the internal switch still only connected to the CPU at 1Gb/s?
    2. How is it possible that the throughput is only ~2.6Gb/s with IDS/IPS enabled, when the Pro/SE was previously advertised as being capable of handling 3.5Gb/s with everything turned on?
    3. In the event of an HA failover, is the session table properly synchronized between the two devices to ensure that TCP connections aren't dropped?

    • @_nick___
      @_nick___ 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      theoretical vs real world would be my guess. I'm not sure the PRO/SE can really handle 3.5Gb/s anyway with everything maxed out.

    • @SY1337
      @SY1337 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@_nick___ I’ve learned that with the “3.5 Gb/s IPS throughput” they mean LAN-WAN / LAN-LAN traffic without the use of vlans. The throughput is way less with vlans on either LAN or WAN enabled.

  • @kristopherleslie8343
    @kristopherleslie8343 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Big video!

  • @CharlesGauthier
    @CharlesGauthier 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for the update Cody.
    But just why?
    If your network is that big, go with the proper components
    Gateway Pro
    Aggregation switch
    UNVR pro.
    Really? people want to build a network for 1000 devices, but want to skimp on hardware.
    Makes no sense...

  • @RyanLRaben
    @RyanLRaben 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I will be doing a large installation for fairground wifi in a few months and am wondering if this would be preferred over a UXG-Pro?

    • @nightbladexxx
      @nightbladexxx 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I suppose it would depend on your projected network traffic and the total amount of WAPs

  • @rogerjones9984
    @rogerjones9984 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Do you know whether Shadow Mode will work between different models - specifically UDM Pro Max and UDM SE?

  • @Pouyou-13
    @Pouyou-13 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I still can't figure out how this is HA when both UDM connect to a single Aggregation switch... if that switch is down, the HA is useless.. anyone found a way to get trunk from both UDM to a pair of
    aggreg switches?

  • @TechnoTim
    @TechnoTim 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Nice work Cody! Shirt looks great! 😂

  • @markvedder1121
    @markvedder1121 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    How's your dual connection to your ISP configured? Do you have two modems?

    • @tonygerassi1502
      @tonygerassi1502 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      In most common redundant pfSense setups that use carp, you have 1 modem with 2 links to each. Each router has an address (192.168.1.1 / 192.168.1.2) and then use a gateway carp address (192.168.1.3) for the DHCP lease, so whether router 1 or router 2 is master, the DHCP lease given makes sense as that address is always up.
      Until we get OS 4.0, we won’t know how Ubiquity is doing the fail over but it might be something similar

  • @YaGr-ip3ub
    @YaGr-ip3ub 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    So High High Availability will come to all Pro/SE Consoles?

  • @mahmoudhamadeh
    @mahmoudhamadeh 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hi Cody, I would appreciate it if you can test UDM Pro Max with PPPOE wan 3.0 gbe with IPS/IDS turned on. With UDM SE I can get max 2.3 gbe Bell Fiber.

  • @bossman18899
    @bossman18899 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    So does the modem need 2 Ethernet ports if both pro max are plugged into it?

    • @bossman18899
      @bossman18899 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If so their own modem can’t be used which is stupid.

  • @samgao
    @samgao 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Now give us SD-WAN rules so that we can move packets seamlessly to the next gateway for UCaaS!

  • @alleng8751
    @alleng8751 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I wish someone would test UDP throughput on this model, UDP is the crux of existing Unifi gateway lines, just 500mbps of UDP will cause sever packet loss and if it goes on long enough, crash any controllers on UDM series.

  • @lzcpg
    @lzcpg 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is cool, don't get me wrong, but can we create IPv6-only VLANs yet?

  • @RRMGarage
    @RRMGarage 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    you should hook a brother up with that SE.. 😉

  • @jrbishop66
    @jrbishop66 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Who's RJ45 to SPF+ transceivers do you use? The one from UI has been out of stock for months.

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The ones I used were from ubiquiti. 10gtec isn’t bad either

  • @aceace6001
    @aceace6001 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    dO THEY HAVE A UNET THE WORKS AS A MODEM?

  • @StYfReX
    @StYfReX 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I was excited when i heard of this product. I thought it would come with POE ++, but it doesnt even come with POE... I just want "one device" that will do cameras and door access for my home, dream wall was almost there if it wasnt for it using only micro sd cards and the UDM SE doesnt have POE++ :c

    • @patrickkinsella8067
      @patrickkinsella8067 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is for large businesses, not home use. This will have Poe switches plugged into so it doesn’t need Poe on it

  • @xmaevy
    @xmaevy 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Does it allow multi-site management?

  • @soarah
    @soarah 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If i'm coming from an UXG-Pro to this, would I still need my cloud key Gen2plus? Thanks~

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Nope you could get rid of the cloud key

  • @andreasgehring8817
    @andreasgehring8817 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

  • @yourpcmd
    @yourpcmd 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How did you split the cable for the ISP connection?

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My cable model has 4 ports on the back.
      If you only have 1 port than you would have to put a switch after your modem

    • @yourpcmd
      @yourpcmd 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@MactelecomNetworks I see. Yeah, I have that already, I use a MokerLink 10Gbps switch because I have 3 IP addresses for 3 different setups, two Unifi setups and the other TP-Link.

    • @grbeck3312
      @grbeck3312 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@MactelecomNetworks Hey Cody. I'm pumped to get my hands on a pro max. You have a switch recommendation to place in the middle of a modem and UDM?

    • @BartLanz
      @BartLanz 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@grbeck3312cheap and dumb. For that I am a fan of the purple or silver Netgear units.

  • @jeremymyers5503
    @jeremymyers5503 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When is UniFi os 4.0 scheduled to be released?

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That I’m not sure. It will have to come to early access first

  • @elchinomacachino
    @elchinomacachino 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Let’s get a Dream Wall Pro with a HDD bay and bottom Ethernet ports!

  • @jas9450
    @jas9450 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Will you be switching to Udm pro max at home?

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      I have it running in my house right now. But these are really meant for large deployments

  • @daytekone
    @daytekone 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i'm curious how you got 2 connections from same ISP ?

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My ISP has multiple connections on the back of the modem. If you only have one port you would need to put a switch after the modem

    • @jderck
      @jderck 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@MactelecomNetworks I have an Arris Sb8200 with 2x rj45 connections on the back. Is that something that would work for this or do you need something fancier?

    • @daytekone
      @daytekone 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@MactelecomNetworks whats your ISP .. i'm also in Canada, using bell ATM and my fiber goes straight into my UDM Pro

    • @DanielSilva-sj8lx
      @DanielSilva-sj8lx 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@MactelecomNetworks doing double NAT?

  • @NecroMorrius
    @NecroMorrius 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Still no network access control, SD-Wan still limited to 15 sites :( How "large scale" can you go when you're limited to 15 sites.

  • @norcobf
    @norcobf 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Did I miss something, why isn't anyone reviewing UXG-MAX? I was hoping to replace a friend's old USG-3 and keep his cloud key plus. This new device appears to tick all my boxes.

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I may do a video on it I have it but was waiting on this to release first

    • @mvp_kryptonite
      @mvp_kryptonite 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I got tired of waiting and jumped on the UXG Pro. But ideally I would have the Max for home use. Looks like a neat product. Now a new cloud key is in order

  • @XpertCS
    @XpertCS 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    How does having 1 internet connection work with Ubiquiti HA? You can’t get the same public ip address to 2 MAC addresses.

    • @patrickkinsella8067
      @patrickkinsella8067 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If your isp modem has 2 or more lan ports, you plug each pro max into a separate port.

    • @XpertCS
      @XpertCS 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks Patrick, but that will not give me a public ip address as the modem is in bridge mode.
      Sounds like I have to go to the ISP and request a 2nd ip address.

    • @skela098
      @skela098 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@XpertCS But you have and use only 1 public IP at the time, on primary router. When secondary takes over it will have that public IP address (if automatic or PPPoE does not matter, it will just take a couple of seconds to reconnect to your IPS servers trough their modem in bridge mode, to give you public ip address)

    • @XpertCS
      @XpertCS 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Sounds about right… I know I have one ISP who hardcodes it to a MAC address but will get that sorted.
      Thanks

  • @justinknash
    @justinknash 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Strange that the max doesn't have 2.5Gbps switch ports and no POE. Can you put the dual drives in striping (raid 0)?

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If you’re using a UDM pro max you would most likely have other switches that have 2.5Gb and poe. Remember this is for large scale
      Also no raid 0 just raid 1

    • @justinknash
      @justinknash 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@MactelecomNetworks ya, I get it's for large scale, but seems like a strange product within their line. A better solution would be UXG Pro (which I have) and then NVR or NVR Pro I think.

  • @specialrequesttech
    @specialrequesttech 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What's the realistic amount of clients this can handle if I'm running about 6 to 8 switches and about 70 APs?

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      They say 2000+

    • @specialrequesttech
      @specialrequesttech 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah I know they say 2000+. But I want to know real well what you believe or what you think it can do based on experiences like the dream machine SE and pro had said 1,000+ what's the maximum you have seen them in real use handle because I want to use one for a small stadium but it won't be just for clients it will also be for the it'll be for the main connection source for the media people also

  • @The_Tech_Ninja
    @The_Tech_Ninja 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Same CPU only 0,3 MHz more… 8gb of ram… double the size of unifi clients and device capacity… but „only“ 5 Gbs IDS/IPS?…not what i expected of a pro max version.
    Would be better with a octa core cpu and upgradeable ram…
    For that money i get a udm pro and one nvr with better performance for protect.
    but maybe there is a usecase for some people.

  • @exploreiceland
    @exploreiceland 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can I restore backup from udm se to udm pro max? :)

    • @BartLanz
      @BartLanz 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, you can move network from one controller to another. You can do full config within the same model series. So udm, UDMP, udmse, udmpm should all be able to swap their device configs around.

    • @exploreiceland
      @exploreiceland 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@BartLanz I've moved controller settis backup from cloudkeys to self hosted and/or dreammachines. But the actual System Config Backup in the os settings, can the restore option there be used to restore "System Config Backup" from let's say, SE to max pro with all the os settings an applications at once?

  • @jensche21
    @jensche21 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    But still just 1Gbe Ports... wtf? Why not all 2.5Gbe?

  • @broliyoung
    @broliyoung 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    They stay with prosumers and upgrade the 8 ports from gig to multigig. That's all. None in enterprise world need that kind of stuffs. None in prosumers world need that. To use in my home I should buy also a separate multigig switch with a PoE. That's mean more power consumption, more maintenance, more space and a lots of unused ports. What I'm waiting for is a udm multigigs with internal ONT and a PoE for the wifi spots. Actually there isn't nothing like this on the market

  • @AM93000
    @AM93000 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    "Pro max" but no rgb?

    • @mvp_kryptonite
      @mvp_kryptonite 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The naming is typical Ubiquiti style. Establish a marketing theme them apply it wherever lol

  • @chaosfenix
    @chaosfenix 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    This device honestly doesn't make sense. How do they justify charging $230 more than the UDM Pro for simply adding a single SATA drive bay? If this thing really is intended for larger deployments it doesn't make sense. Anyone that is installing hundreds of unifi devices and thousands of endpoints is not going to stick their security system on their firewall. They are going to get a separate NVR which Ubiquiti already sells. They also aren't going to use gigabit ports or even 10GBE ports for their trunk ports. They are seriously trying to portray this as an enterprise level device all while limiting most of the ports to gigabit? They do realize that gigabit Ethernet came out in 1999 right?
    If they actually wanted to have this be more for enterprise they should have dropped the drive cages and the 8GBE ports. Instead they should have had a 10GbE RJ45 port, a console port, and around 6 QSFP28 ports so they could actually connect to the trunk of their network. As is this thing will bottleneck it. If they wanted to add even more ports, especially since they got rid of the drive cages, that would be fine. I don't think anyone would complain about more ports or faster ports if they didn't balloon the price doing so. Edit: They would also have redundant power supplies that are hot-swapable, again if this was intended for enterprise use.
    If they actually want an all in one device the drive cages are great but those 8 RJ45 ports should all have POE with probably 4 having POE++ and the other 4 having POE+. They also should be at least 2.5Gbps. The RJ45 WAN port should be 10GbE capable and the 2 fiber cages should be QSFP28. If they wanted to add more ports to this that would be fine. I would be fine with more SFP+ cages or more 2.5GBE ports or another RJ45 WAN port for a backup WAN connection but I just layed out where they should have gone with it keeping the port count and type the same.

    • @pixelhabits
      @pixelhabits 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I completely agree the price point does not make sense without at least PoE & 2.5gb ports. I would 100% replace the less than 3month old UDM SE at one of my sites if it included that.
      The 2.5 gb and PoE would allow me to deploy the U7 access points without a replacement switch and the additional 3 2K cameras the higher processer allows + option to raid the storage would be perfect for this location.

  • @tlteal
    @tlteal 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Wow pro max -- what about pro max ultra max pro?

  • @evelbsstudio
    @evelbsstudio 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Not worth the money, they probably had too many SE bords in stock and this is a way to get rid of them.
    Such a small upgrade for the price

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Double the devices and double the clients is a small upgrade 🙃

  • @rtorcato
    @rtorcato 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ubiquiti stock is really getting hammered. Will this company go bankrupt?

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What are you trying to buy? Everything I’ve needed in the past year or two has been avaiable

    • @braydonscully4646
      @braydonscully4646 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@MactelecomNetworkshe doesn’t mean physical product stock, he means stock price of the company.

    • @rtorcato
      @rtorcato 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@@MactelecomNetworks I am talking about the stock market listing. $UI keeps dropping and with 1 billion in debt the future for this company is a question mark.

  • @szubster
    @szubster 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Lacks PoE....

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      If you’re buying this device you should have poe switches. It’s for large scale

    • @szubster
      @szubster 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      At that large scale, two drive bays are useless, as you would use NVR

    • @ronhoppner
      @ronhoppner 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@szubster You can add a second set of drives to the failover device. In the event your primary goes down, you can set it up to have Protect begin recording on the failover device. Very minimal downtime.

    • @DrTorbjorn
      @DrTorbjorn 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Then why two drive bays lol, nvr but can’t even connect cameras to it. This is a joke

  • @teddymutterperl5492
    @teddymutterperl5492 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Keep the unreleased devices coming!

  • @kristopherleslie8343
    @kristopherleslie8343 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    3 gig wan 😢 to my measly 1 gig wan 😂

  • @luiscobarrus4046
    @luiscobarrus4046 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Tan sexy, me encantan sus video y como explica

  • @feastwithethan9412
    @feastwithethan9412 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    3.5 to 5gbps I wouldn't say is 'significant'. Not even if someone were to use it in a small to medium business. This is a unifi shill guy.

    • @MactelecomNetworks
      @MactelecomNetworks  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      😂 how many small to medium
      Business do you know with 5gbps connections?
      Shill ok. I like Ubiquiti that’s what I sell so that’s what I do videos on